Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study



Similar documents
US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Rio Salado Oeste Salt River-Phoenix, Arizona FEASIBILITY REPORT SUMMARY

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Santa Cruz River, Paseo de las Iglesias Pima County, Arizona PROJECT SUMMARY

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

RILLITO RIVER, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. Draft Feasibility Study

The 91 st Avenue Unified WWTP Targets 100 Percent Reuse

Greater Los Angeles County Region

Section 5: Conserve to Enhance Program Goals What is Conserve to Enhance All About?

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Green Spaces to Improve Waterways and Communities

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

Foothill Municipal Water District Recycled Water Project

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

RESUME Lee A. Knuppel, P.E.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Village of Spring Valley Comprehensive Plan

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

Peters Canyon Channel (OCFCD Facility No. F06) from Confluence with San Diego Creek Channel (F05) to downstream Barranca Parkway

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Liquid Capital. Cochran s Creek: A Case Study in Stream Mitigation Banking in Georgia

Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC MODELING OF WESTMINSTER WATERSHED ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE NATIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW PLAN MODEL

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Control Number : Item Number: 373. Addendum StartPage: 0

Frequently-Asked Questions about Floodplains and Flood Insurance FLOOD INSURANCE

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Municipal Water District of Orange County. Regional Urban Water Management Plan

Plan Groundwater Procurement, Implementation and Costs, prepared for the Brazos River Authority, July 2005.

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

7.0 Stream Restoration

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: July 11, 2013

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

Agua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District,

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SOUTH ATLANTIC ONISI ON, CORPS OF ENGINEERS ROOM 10M15, 60 FORSYTH ST, S.W. ATLANTA. GEORGlA

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study DRAFT APPENDIX J REAL ESTATE PLAN

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

Mission Reach Self-Guided Tour Mission Concepción Portal Loop and Mission Reach Phase II Embayment Loop

Introduction to the Envision Sustainability Rating System

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

How To Save The Lake From Flooding

INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

PROPOSED REHABILITATION SAN CARLOS IRRIGATION PROJECT FACILITIES. Pinal County, Arizona. Scoping Information and Opportunity to Comment

The Albert J. and Mary Jane Black Institute for Environmental Studies

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH ST, SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GEORGIA

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

Section 19. Basin-wide Mitigation Action Plans

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

Transcription:

Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study Santa Cruz River Pima County, Arizona February 2011

Study Area: 18 Miles of Santa Cruz River (Prince to Sanders), portions of City of Tucson, Town of Marana, and unincorporated Pima County.

Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study Study Purpose: Evaluate problems, opportunities and potential solutions, evaluate effects, and recommend a plan for implementation. Focus: Ecosystem Restoration, Flood Risk Management, Water Supply (recharge), and Recreation. Feasibility Report: Presents results and findings, compliance with applicable statutes and policies, provide decision makers and public a basis to judge recommended solutions. Schedule: Draft Report for technical/policy review March 2011. Draft Report/DEIS for public review August 2011.

Identified Problems Degradation and loss of riparian habitat. Rapid growth and development. Loss of environmental values. Limited water availability. Groundwater overdraft. Limited recreation facilities. Bank instability at confluence area.

Study Components Ecosystem Restoration: Restore riparian and adjacent habitats along river corridor. Flood Risk Management: Evaluating flood and associated erosion risks throughout study area. Includes measures to stabilize river channel and banks. Groundwater Recharge: Evaluating opportunities to provide constructed recharge within the study area. Draft plan being currently being finalized. Recreation: Plan provides pedestrian and equestrian trail heads, crossings, interpretive signage and facilities. Links to other recreational facilities to provide opportunities for local and regional users.

National Ecosystem Restoration (NER) Plan Plan that meets objectives and constraints, and reasonably maximizes environmental benefits while passing tests of cost effectiveness. Policy requires identification of NER Plan for comparison. Draft Report will compare NER Plan to other alternatives. Will undergo Public, Technical, and Policy Review. Plan may be refined based upon reviews. Non-Federal partners currently support Draft NER Plan.

Draft National Ecosystem Restoration Plan New Acres Cottonwood/willow: 78 Mesquite: 694 Riparian Scrub: 558 River bottom (wet): 72

Water Assumptions Future discharge to river significantly reduced. Estimate 26,980 AF to maintain Status Quo. Includes 25,430 AF in channel losses and 1,550 AF in consumptive use Multiple sources of project water, most likely sources identified in report. Restoration will be designed to utilize storm runoff. Evaluating opportunities for additional recharge in conjunction with restoration. Restoration Plan Water Requirement (approximate) 8,800 AF/yr 5 yrs. (plant establishment) 5,500 AF/year - after 5 yrs. (Support in-channel cottonwood and wetlands) Recent Approximate Effluent Entitlements, Based on 70,000 AF.

Groundwater Recharge Initial array of 15 constructed recharge measures. T-berms Multiple channels Off-channel basins Rubber dam Assume SAWRSA Effluent Recharged (USBR Collaboration). Benefits based on net increase in recharge compared to no action plan. Dollar value for benefits based on marginal cost of additional supply.* $305 acre foot CAGRD Rate Schedule Possible to formulate combined Recharge/Restoration Plan. *USACE Planning Guidance, ER 1105-2-100

Recreation and Flood Risk Management Recreation Plan - Pedestrian and equestrian trail heads, crossings, interpretive signage and facilities. Links to other recreational facilities to provide opportunities for local and regional users. $13,000,000, 50/50 Cost Shared Flood Risks - Due to limited development in flood prone areas there was minimal reach-wide justification for structural measures. Focus on bank stability in confluence area. 6,500 feet of bank stabilization proposed. Included in Restoration costs.

Key Study Milestones Milestone Date Initiate Study 09/2001 Public Scoping Meeting 10/2001 Feasibility Scoping Meeting (Problems and opportunities, forecast conditions) 07/2002 Alternative Review Conference (Range of alternative plans) 11/2003 Alternative Formulation Briefing (Comparison of plans, Draft plan) 06/2004 Draft Report (Public review of draft plan) 8/2011 Final Public Meeting (Presentation of NER Plan) 8/2011 Feasibility Review Conference (policy compliance review) 9/2011 Final Report 9/2011 Civil Works Review Board (Corps Headquarters Approval) 10/2011 Chief of Engineers Report (Recommendation) 2/2012 Design Agreement 2012 Congressional Project Authorization (Water Resource Development Act) 2012

Long Term Goals Rio Salado 2003 Restore regionally, and nationally significant riparian habitat. Reduce risk of flood damages. Rio Salado 2005 Provide groundwater recharge opportunities. Increase local and regional recreation opportunities in conjunction with restoration. Rio Salado 2007

Questions Kim M. Gavigan, P.E., CFM Chief, Water Resources Planning Section C U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Los Angeles District 3636 N. Central Ave, Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Phone: 602-230-6902