A. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM



Similar documents
Healthcare Facilities - Pioneer Valley

DRAFT. Pioneer Valley Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan. Pioneer Valley Planning Commission February 4, 2015

CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)

CHAPTER 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS

Quaboag Hills Region Resource Guide For Drug and Alcohol Treatment and Related Services

HERS_IN. HIGHWAY ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM (for) INDIANA. AASHTO Transportation Estimator Association Conference October 16, 2001

Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

Earth Retaining Structures

INDOT Long Range Plan

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS

GENERAL. This manual addresses five local programs that are funded under the current Highway Act:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON

INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITALIZATION Chapter 12 INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITALIZATION (GASB 34)

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC

CLINICAL EDUCATION. The following classes require observation and interaction with affiliated sites:

LCCA Defined (FHWA) LCCA Policy Statement (9/96) LCCA Policy Statement (9/96) Policy Statement Con t... Use of LCCA. CE 4401 Pavement Design


ASSET MANAGEMENT. ASHE East Penn Web-Ex October 17th, Asset Management The right solution at the right time. 1

MODULE 3. Upon completion of this module the participants will be able to:

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)

Transportation Asset Management Program 2009 Federal Aid PASER Road Survey. August 2009

Regional Asset Management Regional Asset Management Program Peer Review

Hilltown CDC - Best Practices For Small Business

Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation

Transportation Management

Cross Asset Management Revamped Revisiting Asset Manager NT and PT Presented by : Jose Aldayuz, PE IHEEP Conference New Orleans

American Public Works Association Asset Management Task Force, 1998

Surface Transportation Program (STP) OVERVIEW AND GENERAL RULES* Approved June 2007 Revised January 2008 Revised September 2013

Asset Management for MAP-21. Gary Lasham, P.E. Jonathan Pollack

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Asset Management Plan Final Report

How to Use the Propane Statewide Contract

Implementing Pavement Management Systems, Do's and Don ts at the Local Agency Level

How to Use the Bio-diesel Statewide Contract

Four-Year Colleges Within a 50-Mile Radius of Pittsfield, MA

Four-Year Colleges Within a 50-Mile Radius of Pittsfield, MA

RANDOM/GRID BLOCK CRACKING EXTREME SEVERITY. Transverse Cracking- Extreme Severity. Alligator Cracking- High. Severity

REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources

Verizon to Invest $200 Million to Expand Broadband in Massachusetts in 2008

Butch Wlaschin P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management, Pavements, and Construction FHWA

NEVADA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Genesee County

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

Directory CAREER CENTER. Experiential Education (1)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CABLE TELEVISION RATES

RoadMatrix V3.1 has incorporated many engineering enhancements including the following:

EXPERIENCE WITH GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) / MAPPING

A Pavement Management System for County Roads

Regional Surface Transportation Program Policy and Allocation

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised 2015

Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act

Presented via Video Recording at IHEEP Conference June 2014

Road Asset Management vs Pavement Management A new Paradigm. Arthur Taute Stewart Russell

Is it time for a new direction? How can I advance in my career? Can I afford to go back to school? GRADUATE AND CONTINUING EDUCATION PROGRAMS

provided for improvements for each structure during these timeframes. Rehabilitation and Investment Strategies:

2012 Statewide Bridge Sufficiency Rating Report. The Indiana LTAP Center. Indiana Department of Transportation

4 TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITY PLANNING 2013 STATE OF INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT

The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Shiawassee County

How To Improve Road Quality

Bill Eshbaugh, P.E. Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division October 26, 2007

City of Alpena Transportation Asset Management Program FY 2013 PASER Road Survey

AASHTO First Take at the New Surface Transportation Bill FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT December 2, 2015

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

How To Modernize And Maintain Roads, Highways And Bridges In Maine

TRAFFIC MONITORING GUIDE

Definitions. For the purposes of this rule chapter the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly shows otherwise:

PRIORITIZATION PROCESSES

Status of Pavement Management Systems (PMS) in Southeast Michigan. May 2003

Guide to the Texas A&M Transportation Institute Mobile Retroreflectometer Certification Program

THE FINANCIAL PLAN INTRODUCTION THE HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

DO NOT Inject in the same spot over and over again. DO NOT Share needles, syringes, cookers, cotton or water.

PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

DRAFT MAINTAINING HOUSTON S STREETS REPAIR, REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION. Using the Full Range of Tools for a Challenging Job

ARTICLE 26 ATTACHMENT A Page 1. Representative Family Definitions. Massachusetts College Communities. Northampton Smith College [4]

Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan

Cornell Asset Management Program - Roads & Streets (CAMP-RS) 2014

STIP Process to Add NY Works Accelerated Bridge & Pavement Preservation Programs

MAP-21 Data Assessment Workshop. August 24, 2015

A Web-Based Trail Map for the Pioneer Valley Region

INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRIC SUPPLY BELOW 600 VOLTS

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS

Cost Considerations of In-Place Recycling as a Pavement Rehabilitation Alternative Brian Diefenderfer, PhD, PE Alex Apeagyei, PhD, PE

Date: 10/10/2014 Initiated by: AAS-100

Oscoda County Transportation Asset Management Program FY 2013 PASER Road Survey

Bumpy Roads Ahead: America s Roughest Rides and Strategies to Make our Roads Smoother

Financial Management Assistance Program and Consultant Services

NEW JERSEY TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION. DOT Is Progressing toward a Performance-Based Approach, but States and Grantees Report Potential Implementation Challenges

Massachusetts Emergency Service Program (ESP) Directory

ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

Analysis of the 2015 Senate Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The DRIVE Act

The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan

A GIS Enabled Cost Estimation Tool for Road Upgrade and Maintenance to assist Road Asset Management System

Implementing the CPA for Assessors and Tax Collectors Prepared by the Highland Communities Initiative January 2007

Summary of MAP-21 Matrix

May 29, Ongoing Flood Damages to County Federal-aid Routes

Recovering from the 2010 Nashville Flood

Transcription:

CHAPTER 9 PAVEMENT A. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM A Pavement Management System (PMS) is a systematic process that collects and analyzes roadway pavement information for use in selecting cost-effective strategies for providing and maintaining pavements in a serviceable condition. The role of PMS is to provide an opportunity to improve roadway conditions and make costeffective decisions on maintenance priorities and schedules. 1. Regional Efforts and Process The Pioneer Valley Planning Commission s (PVPC) regional PMS involves a comprehensive process for establishing the network inventory and project histories, collecting and storing the pavement distress data, analyzing the data, identifying the network maintenance activities and needs and integrating the PMS information in the metropolitan and statewide planning processes. The Pioneer Valley region covers approximately 1,200 square miles, roughly the same size as the state of Rhode Island. The roadway network covered by the regional PMS includes all urban and rural Federal-Aid highways of the 43 cities and towns in the region. The Pioneer Valley region consists of approximately 1,400 miles of Federal-Aid eligible roadways. In October 2009, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) mandated that the Regional Planning Agencies (RPA) undertake a study to establish the cost of maintaining the Federal-Aid roadways that make up their regions with the expectation that the results of these studies will be incorporated in every update of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) thereafter. The PVPC s regional PMS efforts have been ongoing since 1995 at which time the RPAs were complying with the requirements of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991. In an effort to continue to be in federal compliance, the PVPC has continued the regional PMS efforts. Staff have collected and analyzed pavement distress data for all 43 cities and towns in the Pioneer Valley Region. The PVPC utilizes the prepackaged Pavement Management software program The PAVEMENTView developed by Cartegraph Systems. The PAVEMENTView uses a Road Condition Index (RCI) as a measurement of roadway serviceability and as a method to establish performance criteria. Since the PVPC only collects pavement distress information, the Overall Condition Index (OCI) produced by PAVEMENTView was used for analysis purposes. An OCI was generated for each inventoried roadway segment in the region using the pavement distress data collected by the PVPC staff. Deduct values assigned to 257 Chapter 9 Pavement

each type of distress based on severity and extent, were applied to generate an OCI for each roadway segment. OCI is measured from 0 to 100, with 100 being an excellent or perfect condition and zero being failure or impassable condition. The OCI values generated are grouped into OCI category ranges which are defined depending on the type and functional class of each segment. These OCI categories along with other factors, such as a Base Index, Average Curb Reveal, Functional Class and Pavement Type are used to assign a Repair Strategy for each of the defined segments. The PVPC incorporates 6 default repair categories: 1. Reconstruction of Collectors and Arterial Streets 2. Reconstruction of Local Roads (not used in regional efforts) 3. Rehabilitation 4. Preventive Maintenance 5. Routine Maintenance 6. No Action Reconstruction involves the complete removal and replacement of a failed pavement section which includes reclamation. For the most part, the cost per square yard differs for local roads as opposed to collectors and arterials. The rehabilitation of pavements includes the work necessary to restore the pavement to a condition that will allow it to perform satisfactorily for several years. Preventative maintenance activities are those which are performed at planned intervals to protect and seal the pavement. Routine maintenance activities are those which are taken to correct a specific pavement failure or area distress. The following summarizes the findings of the region s surveyed federal-aid eligible roadways and recommends appropriate maintenance activities. A documented guideline of project priority, cost and recommended maintenance activity may be produced in a systematic and coordinated manner for the entire region. Project level analysis is conducted and highway maintenance projects are developed, the results of which are an integral part of the RTP and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). 2. Existing Conditions The PVPC staff surveyed approximately 1,280 miles of federal-aid eligible roadways in the Pioneer Valley region which was divided into 2,473 roadway segments. Pavement distress data was collected for the entire Surface Transportation Program (STP) roadway network and select National Highway System (NHS) roadways. The average OCI for the surveyed roadways in the region is rated at 64, which indicates 2016 Update to the Pioneer Valley Regional Transportation Plan 258

that majority of the roadways are in a moderately good condition. The average OCI information by community is depicted in Table 9-1. Table 9-1 Average OCI by Community Community Arterial Miles Collector Miles Fed Aid Miles 259 Average OCI 2015 Average OCI 2011 Agawam 24.47 26.18 50.65 67 66 Amherst 16.32 34.15 50.47 58 70 Belchertown 26.22 21.27 47.49 74 80 Blandford 8.56 8.41 16.97 68 68 Brimfield 11.58 13.26 24.84 57 83 Chester 8.058 0 8.058 73 84 Chesterfield 7.713 9.96 17.673 79 81 Chicopee 17.84 42.94 60.78 74 81 Cummington 12.95 8.05 21 71 71 East Longmeadow 8.43 23.304 31.734 73 73 Easthampton 4.25 25.723 29.973 68 68 Goshen 5.401 3.7058 9.1068 71 71 Granby 7.7155 14.117 21.8325 67 85 Granville 8.803 6.452 15.255 76 76 Hadley 17.996 21.439 39.435 85 85 Hampden 0 12.65 12.65 84 84 Hatfield 0 14.687 14.687 83 83 Holland 0 7.279 7.279 35 77 Holyoke 16.25 46.97 63.22 54 82 Huntington 11.227 4.846 16.073 72 72 Longmeadow 3.26 15.79 19.05 74 61 Ludlow 24.46 9.689 34.149 68 83 Monson 8.64 25.484 34.124 54 83 Montgomery 0 5.197 5.197 74 83 Northampton 50.81 15.7 66.51 68 73 Palmer 16.603 30.572 47.175 56 87 Pelham 5.795 10.155 15.95 49 71 Plainfield 0 11.893 11.893 39 74 Russell 9.45 5.084 14.534 60 78 South Hadley 15.39 13.84 29.23 65 74 Southampton 0 17.17 17.17 58 88 Southwick 14.14 20.34 34.48 77 77 Springfield 42.7 117.42 160.12 62 78 Tolland 5.66 0 5.66 77 77 Wales 0 9.66 9.66 44 73 Ware 13.36 19.77 33.13 66 85 West Springfield 7.51 28.64 36.15 60 72 Westfield 19.14 48.72 67.86 62 78 Westhampton 0 21.08 21.08 71 71 Wilbraham 5.79 28.22 34.01 71 85 Williamsburg 7.87 11.2 19.07 74 74 Worthington 11.07 6.76 17.83 52 84 Average OCI 71.1 77.6 Chapter 9 Pavement

The OCI generated by PAVEMENTView was used to establish pavement condition categories of Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, and Failed with OCI ranges provided in Table 9-2. Table 9-2 Pavement Condition Range by Functional Class Excellent Good Fair Poor Failed Arterial >89.5 >69.5 and <=89.5 >48.5 and <=69.5 >25.5 and <=48.5 <=26.5 Collector >88.5 >68.5 and <=88.5 >47.5 and <=68.5 >23.5 and <=47.5 <=24.5 The results indicate that most of the region s surveyed federal-aid eligible roadways are in good condition. Figures 9-1 and 9-2 depict the region s pavement condition graphically by functional class. As shown, the region s arterial and collector roadways follow a similar pattern with regards to pavement condition. The region s surveyed federal-aid roadways consist of 459 miles of arterial and 820 miles of collector roadways. The percentages are 36% and 64% respectively. Figure 9-1 Pavement Condition of the Region s Arterial Roadways Arterial 16% 20% 12% 19% 33% Excellent Good Fair Poor Failed 2016 Update to the Pioneer Valley Regional Transportation Plan 260

Figure 9-2 Pavement Condition of the Region s Collector Roadways Collector 16% 18% 22% 16% 28% Excellent Good Fair Poor Failed Figures 9-3 and 9-4 show a comparison of the number of miles of existing surveyed roadways by pavement condition to the last time the RTP was updated for the arterial and collector roadways respectively. Figure 9-3 is indicative of pavement repair action taken on the arterial roadway segments which require major rehabilitation and whose condition cannot deteriorate much further. The trend is reversed as far as the region's collector roadways are concerned. Figure 9-4 is indicative of application of improvement funds to be directed towards the cost effective repairs that improve and/or maintain the segments which are salvageable. 261 Chapter 9 Pavement

Figure 9-3 Arterial Road Condition Comparisons by Miles 300 250 200 150 100 2015 2011 50 0 Excellent Good Fair Poor Failed Figure 9-4 Collector Road Condition Comparisons by Miles 350 300 250 200 150 2015 2011 100 50 0 Excellent Good Fair Poor Failed 3. Regional Roadway Improvement Needs The budgeting process of the PAVEMENTView can be used to calculate the backlog of repair work for the region by assigning 100% of roadway segments within the best OCI range. The backlog is defined as the cost of bringing all roads up to a near perfect condition within one year. 2016 Update to the Pioneer Valley Regional Transportation Plan 262

The backlog represents how far behind the roadway network is in terms of its present physical condition and measures the cost of performing all desirable repairs to achieve the best OCI range. At the end of the year 2015 the backlog repair work for the Pioneer Valley Region was $491,410,099. This cost estimate is useful in identifying the pavement condition of the system at the end of the year 2015 and in comparing to future and/or past year's backlogs. After the backlog of improvement needs have been determined, the recommended maintenance actions for roadway segments may be ranked by priority. The priority of segment improvement is determined based on its calculated Network Priority Ranking (NPR). NPR is a function of vehicle volume, roadway length, estimated life of repair, improvement cost, and OCI, and it is a measurement of the benefit/cost ratio for each segment improvement recommendation. NPR is used to rank roadway projects based on a priority scale. The projects with a higher NPR are assigned a higher priority and projects with a lower NPR are assigned a lower priority. The higher the NPR, the higher the project priority. The roadway segments with the same NPR are assigned the same priority ranking and segments with no NPR are not assigned a priority ranking. Table 9-3 summarizes the region's backlog of Federal-Aid eligible roadway repair work by community. The table also provides information on how far behind each community is as far as backlogs of reconstruction and resurfacing work are concerned. It is important to note that the region s total reconstruction cost is almost double of the resurfacing needs. 263 Chapter 9 Pavement

Table 9-3 Backlog of Repair Work by Community Community Backlog Reconstruction Resurfacing Agawam $16,224,260.00 $10,678,599.00 $3,318,244.00 Amherst $16,465,268.00 $9,564,698.00 $5,013,537.00 Belchertown $12,471,340.00 $9,278,184.00 $2,195,919.00 Blandford $2,202,833.00 $1,522,460.00 $115,664.00 Brimfield $6,803,075.00 $0.00 $5,339,046.00 Chester $1,096,330.00 $0.00 $0.00 Chesterfield $495,630.00 $0.00 $0.00 Chicopee $19,413,757.00 $9,261,579.00 $5,006,645.00 Cummington $1,685,082.00 $0.00 $940,469.00 East Longmeadow $4,157,136.00 $154,539.00 $2,055,656.00 Easthampton $5,133,550.00 $1,000,955.00 $2,357,653.00 Goshen $824,652.00 $0.00 $0.00 Granby $2,790,316.00 $551,413.00 $1,330,244.00 Granville $408,334.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hadley $1,044,712.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hampden $157,351.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hatfield $734,532.00 $0.00 $34,532.00 Holland $5,537,211.00 $5,534,553.00 $0.00 Holyoke $45,506,335.00 $36,489,463.00 $5,958,641.00 Huntington $927,743.00 $0.00 $671,051.00 Longmeadow $4,386,832.00 $1,820,405.00 $1,946,578.00 Ludlow $13,933,099.00 $8,967,153.00 $2,449,756.00 Monson $12,260,843.00 $8,892,545.00 $2,263,021.00 Montgomery $267,677.00 $0.00 $0.00 Northampton $29,748,336.00 $18,615,035.00 $7,555,272.00 Palmer $19,530,349.00 $9,810,988.00 $7,130,820.00 Pelham $4,688,337.00 $4,578,590.00 $25,973.00 Plainfield $7,455,723.00 $7,216,279.00 $206,891.00 Russell $3,023,725.00 $0.00 $2,513,856.00 South Hadley $8,896,811.00 $4,165,058.00 $3,680,120.00 Southampton $5,113,496.00 $593,736.00 $4,051,855.00 Southwick $3,413,098.00 $0.00 $2,413,172.00 Springfield $82,325,101.00 $55,735,779.00 $19,380,323.00 Tolland $349,425.00 $0.00 $0.00 Wales $3,011,218.00 $2,174,126.00 $0.00 Ware $6,106,834.00 $1,284,186.00 $2,079,357.00 West Springfield $23,752,869.00 $16,926,189.00 $5,245,773.00 Westfield $28,809,173.00 $15,578,118.00 $9,504,696.00 Westhampton $15,368,747.00 $15,368,747.00 $0.00 Wilbraham $6,593,550.00 $1,761,417.00 $2,480,844.00 Williamsburg $12,881,174.00 $12,881,174.00 $0.00 Worthington $3,609,078.00 $0.00 $2,073,076.00 Total $439,604,942.00 $270,405,968.00 $109,338,684.00 2016 Update to the Pioneer Valley Regional Transportation Plan 264