Transportation Asset Management Program 2009 Federal Aid PASER Road Survey. August 2009
|
|
|
- Marcus Payne
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Transportation Asset Management Program 2009 Federal Aid PASER Road Survey August 2009
2 WEST MICHIGAN SHORELINE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (WMSRDC) The WMSRDC is a regional council of governments representing 127 local governments in the West Michigan counties of Lake, Mason, Muskegon, Newaygo, Oceana, and northern Ottawa. The mission of WMSRDC is to promote and foster regional development in West Michigan through cooperation amongst local governments. James Rynberg, Chairperson Robert Genson, Vice-Chairperson, James Maike, Secretary Sandeep Dey, Executive Director Project Staff: Joel Fitzpatrick, Senior Planner Brian Mulnix, Program Manager Stephen Carlson, Associate Planner
3 Transportation Asset Management Council 2009 PASER Road Survey I. Background and Overview What Is Asset Management? Asset management is a concept in the transportation industry that is emerging as an important planning tool for public officials, planners, engineers, and others. Asset Management is based on an inventory of each local road network within the region. It will provide data that will allow transportation officials to monitor, plan, and strategically improve the road network. This strategic method of investment marks a break from the traditional tactical method of fixing roads that have the most severe problems. The Michigan Transportation Commission has formed an Asset Management Council, with the objective to implement a state law that enacted the Asset Management Program. The Council is appointed by the Transportation Commission and answers directly to the Commission and legislature. Its five main elements include: Policy goals and objectives, Data Collection, Planning and Programming, Program Delivery, and Monitoring and Reporting. Its goal is to inventory all 39,000 miles of federally eligible roads within the State of Michigan, and according to the data collected, determine future distribution of ACT 51 transportation funds. In the future, the Asset Management Council may implement a similar initiative to collect similar information on the remaining local road network. Regional Commission Involvement Each year, WMSRDC staff, along with the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and a county road commission employee, collects this data within Region 14. Each year, staff attends a training session to review the previous year s collection process and to retrain those who will be involved. Each region within the state receives a laptop equipped with GIS, a GPS device, and software to collect the data. The data collection effort will require the collection of three items: PASER rating, surface type, and the number of lanes. PASER is a visual rating assessment system that rates the road surface condition for a given segment on a scale of PURPOSE: The purpose of this task is to help satisfy the requirements of P.A. 499 of 2002, which establishes an Asset Management Council and charges it to develop an Asset Management Process for the State of Michigan. Regional transportation planning agencies play a significant role in this process as outlined in the task assignments below Asset Management Summary Page 1
4 METHOD: The Asset Management Council has developed a statewide process that will result in approximately 50 percent of federal aid eligible roads in the state to be rated per year using the PASER system. Activities to be undertaken as part of this task include: PRODUCTS: 1. Attendance at a 1-day training seminar on the use of PASER. 2. Participation as part of a 3-person team that will rate the federal-aid eligible roads in the region. 3. Providing the results of the PASER ratings to local agencies for review and revise where appropriate. 4. Public display of PASER ratings on Web site or through other public means so it is available for public review and use in project and plan development activities. 5. Transmit PASER ratings along with other roadway data (i.e. traffic counts). 1. Road network loaded in ROADSOFT. 2. PASER data collected on federal-aid eligible roads in region. 3. Web based or other public display of PASER road ratings on network. 4. Report to the Asset Management Council with PASER and other roadway data and transportation project completion information for the region. II. Data Collection Process In previous years regional staff assisted in rating 100 percent of roads on the Federal Aid system. Beginning in 2008 regional staff rated 50 percent of the Federal Aid system miles. This collection of the 50 percent of the data continued in Each year, WMSRDC staff, along with an MDOT employee and a county road commission employee, collects this data within Region 14. The first step in this process is for each of the County Road Commissions to decide which roads will be included in the current year s 50 percent rating survey. Once this has been decided a network is created in RoadSoft and exported to the Region s Laptop Data Collector (LDC). The LDC software is housed on the Region s laptop computer and connected to a GPS unit. The rating group then drives the entire network that was previously selected by the Road Commission. For each segment of road the three person team agrees on a road rating by using the PASER system, giving a numerical value for the condition of the road, 10 being new and 1 being failed. Once the entire network has been rated, the data is exported back to the County Road Commission s RoadSoft program. After this is completed the County s data is exported to the Region, which passes the information back to the Asset Management Council Asset Management Summary Page 2
5 III. PASER Rating System The PASER road rating system was developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Transportation Information Center to be use as the State of Wisconsin s standard road rating system. PASER is a windshield road rating system that uses a 1 to 10 rating scale, with a value of 10 representing a new road and a value of 1 representing a failed road. Condition ratings are assigned by monitoring the type and amount of visual defects along a road segment while driving the segment. The PASER system interprets these observations into a condition rating. A sample PASER rating chart has been included with this report. The State of Michigan Asset Management Council has requested that the information gathered in this survey be reported using the following categories: Roads with PASER ratings of 8-10 require Routine Maintenance. Routine maintenance is the day-to-day maintenance activities that are scheduled, such as street sweeping, drainage clearing, shoulder gravel grading, and sealing cracks, to prevent standing water and water penetration. Roads with PASER ratings of 5-7 require Capital Preventive Maintenance. Capital preventive maintenance is a planned set of cost effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves, retards future deterioration and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system without significantly increasing structural capacity. The purpose of capital preventive maintenance fixes is to protect the pavement structure, slow the rate of pavement deterioration and/or correct pavement surface deficiencies. Surface treatments are targeted at pavement surface defects primarily caused by the environment and by pavement material deficiencies. Roads with PASER ratings of 1-4 require Structural Improvements. This category includes work identified as rehabilitation and reconstruction which address the structural integrity of a road. This Road Rating system is illustrated on the following page Asset Management Summary Page 3
6 Surface Rating Visible Distress General Condition / Treatment Measures 10 Excellent None New construction 9 Excellent None Recent overlay, like new. 8 Very Good No longitudinal cracks except reflection of paving joints. Occasional transverse cracks, widely spaced (40' or greater). 7 Good Very slight or no raveling, surface shows some traffic wear. Longitudinal cracks (open 1/4") spaced due to reflection or paving joints. Transverse cracks (open 1/4") spaced 10 feet or more apart, little or slight crack raveling. No patching or very few patches in excellent condition. 6 Good Slight raveling (loss of lines) and traffic wear. Longitudinal cracks (open 1/4" - 1/2") due to reflection and paving joints. Transverse cracking (open 1/4" - 1/2") some spaced less than 10 feet. Slight to moderate flushing or polishing. Occasional patching in good condition. 5 Fair Moderate to severe raveling (loss of lines and coarse aggregate). Longitudinal cracks (open 1/2") show some slight raveling and secondary cracks. First signs of longitudinal cracks near wheel path or edge. Transverse cracking and first signs of block cracking. Slight crack raveling (open 1/2"). Extensive to severe flushing or polishing. Some patching or edge wedging in good condition. Recent sealcoat or new road mix. Little or no maintenance required. First signs of aging. Maintain with routine crack filling. Show signs of aging, sound structural condition. Could extend life with sealcoat. Surface aging, sound structural condition. Needs sealcoat or nonstructural overlay. 4 Fair Severe surface raveling. Significant aging and Multiple longitudinal and transverse cracking with first signs of need for slight raveling. strengthening. Would Block cracking (over 25-50% of surface). benefit from recycling Patching in fair condition. or overlay. Slight rutting or distortions (1" deep or less). 3 Poor Closely spaced longitudinal and transverse cracks often showing raveling and crack erosion. Block cracking over 50% of surface. Some alligator cracking (less than 25% of surface). Patches in fair to poor condition. Moderate rutting or distortion (1" or 2" deep). Occasional potholes. 2 Very Poor Alligator cracking (over 25% of surface). Severe distortions (over 2" deep). Extensive patching in poor condition. Potholes. 1 Failed Severe distress with extensive loss of surface integrity. Need patching and major overlay or complete recycling. Severe deterioration. Needs reconstruction with extensive base repair. Failed. Needs total reconstruction Asset Management Summary Page 4
7 IV. County Projects Lake County Project overview: On May 19, 2009, West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission (Region 14) staff, along with representatives of the Lake County Road Commission (LCRC) and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), assessed the condition of Lake County federal-aid eligible roads using the PASER road rating system, as requested by the State of Michigan Asset Management Council. PASER road rating system: The PASER road rating system was developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Transportation Information Center to be used as the State of Wisconsin s standard road rating system. Michigan s Asset Management Council has chosen this system also. PASER is a windshield road rating system that uses a 1 to 10 rating scale, with a value of 10 representing a new road and a value of 1 representing a failed road. Condition ratings are assigned by monitoring the type and amount of visual defects along a road segment while driving the segment. The PASER system interprets these observations into a condition rating. The State of Michigan Asset Management Council has requested that the information gathered in this survey be reported using the following categories: Roads with PASER ratings of 8-10 require Routine Maintenance. Routine maintenance is the day-to-day maintenance activities that are scheduled, such as street sweeping, drainage clearing, shoulder gravel grading, and sealing cracks, to prevent standing water and water penetration. Roads with PASER ratings of 5-7 require Capital Preventive Maintenance. Capital preventive maintenance is a planned set of cost effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves, retards future deterioration and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system without significantly increasing structural capacity. The purpose of capital preventive maintenance fixes is to protect the pavement structure, slow the rate of pavement deterioration and/or correct pavement surface deficiencies. Surface treatments are targeted at pavement surface defects primarily caused by the environment and by pavement material deficiencies. Roads with PASER ratings of 1-4 require Structural Improvements. This category includes work identified as rehabilitation and reconstruction which address the structural integrity of a road Asset Management Summary Page 5
8 Computer Equipment and Software: Staff collected data using a laptop computer with the RoadSoft GIS Laptop Data Collector software. A Garmin GPS unit was connected to the laptop to track position and locate road segments. RoadSoft GIS is an asset management software package created and distributed free of charge by the Michigan Technology Institute s Technology Development Group. The current version of the program was designed with a special module to collect PASER rating data. Staff Time: For the purpose of collecting PASER data, it is most efficient to have three people in the vehicle, one driver, one navigator/rater, and the third staff member who is assigned to enter information into the computer. For the Lake County road rating project, there was always one Region 14 representative, one LCRC representative, and one MDOT representative present. Training: All participants in the survey were required to attend a daylong training session. Participants received an overview of the project and were given instruction on how to use the RoadSoft software and the PASER road rating system for data collection. Once out in the field, experienced staff members taught the new participants how to use the RoadSoft program and guided them through the rating process. Most participants felt comfortable after an hour of working the computer and rating the roads. Results: Approximately 145 miles of federal-aid eligible roads were rated for this project. The following summarizes the distribution of ratings by mileage and percentage of the total for all roads rated in the project. The Asset Management Council has prescribed a fix for each of the PASER rating categories: - Roads receiving a rating of 8 or better require only Routine Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating of 5-7 require Capitol Preventative Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating less than or equal to 4 require Structural Improvements PASER Rating Prescribed Fix Miles Percent of Total Miles Rated 1-4 Structural Improvements 82 miles (57%) 5-7 Capital Preventative Maintenance 58 miles (40%) 8-10 Routine Maintenance 5 miles (3%) 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 6
9 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 7
10 Mason County Project overview: On May 19 th and 20 th, 2009, West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission (Region 14) staff, along with representatives of the Mason County Road Commission (MCRC) and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), assessed the condition of Mason County federal-aid eligible roads using the PASER road rating system, as requested by the State of Michigan Asset Management Council. PASER road rating system: The PASER road rating system was developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Transportation Information Center to be used as the State of Wisconsin s standard road rating system. Michigan s Asset Management Council has chosen this system also. PASER is a windshield road rating system that uses a 1 to 10 rating scale, with a value of 10 representing a new road and a value of 1 representing a failed road. Condition ratings are assigned by monitoring the type and amount of visual defects along a road segment while driving the segment. The PASER system interprets these observations into a condition rating. The State of Michigan Asset Management Council has requested that the information gathered in this survey be reported using the following categories: Roads with PASER ratings of 8-10 require Routine Maintenance. Routine maintenance is the day-to-day maintenance activities that are scheduled, such as street sweeping, drainage clearing, shoulder gravel grading, and sealing cracks, to prevent standing water and water penetration. Roads with PASER ratings of 5-7 require Capital Preventive Maintenance. Capital preventive maintenance is a planned set of cost effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves, retards future deterioration and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system without significantly increasing structural capacity. The purpose of capital preventive maintenance fixes is to protect the pavement structure, slow the rate of pavement deterioration and/or correct pavement surface deficiencies. Surface treatments are targeted at pavement surface defects primarily caused by the environment and by pavement material deficiencies. Roads with PASER ratings of 1-4 require Structural Improvements. This category includes work identified as rehabilitation and reconstruction which address the structural integrity of a road Asset Management Summary Page 8
11 Computer Equipment and Software: Staff collected data using a laptop computer with the RoadSoft GIS Laptop Data Collector software. A Garmin GPS unit was connected to the laptop to track position and locate road segments. RoadSoft GIS is an asset management software package created and distributed free of charge by the Michigan Technology Institute s Technology Development Group. The current version of the program was designed with a special module to collect PASER rating data. Staff Time: For the purpose of collecting PASER data, it is most efficient to have three people in the vehicle, one driver, one navigator/rater, and the third staff member who is assigned to enter information into the computer. For the Mason County road rating project, there was always one Region 14 representative, one MCRC representative, and one MDOT representative present. Training: All participants in the survey were required to attend a daylong training session. Participants received an overview of the project and were given instruction on how to use the RoadSoft software and the PASER road rating system for data collection. Once out in the field, experienced staff members taught the new participants how to use the RoadSoft program and guided them through the rating process. Most participants felt comfortable after an hour of working the computer and rating the roads. Results: Approximately 158 miles of federal-aid eligible roads were rated for this project. The following summarizes the distribution of ratings by mileage and percentage of the total for all roads rated in the project. The Asset Management Council has prescribed a fix for each of the PASER rating categories: - Roads receiving a rating of 8 or better require only Routine Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating of 5-7 require Capitol Preventative Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating less than or equal to 4 require Structural Improvements PASER Rating Prescribed Fix Miles Percent of Total Miles Rated 1-4 Structural Improvements 84 miles (53%) 5-7 Capital Preventative Maintenance 64 miles (40%) 8-10 Routine Maintenance 9 miles (6%) 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 9
12 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 10
13 Muskegon County Project overview: On June 16 th, 17 th, and 19 th, 2009, West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission (Region 14) staff, along with representatives of the Muskegon County Road Commission (MCRC) and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), assessed the condition of Muskegon County federal-aid eligible roads using the PASER road rating system, as requested by the State of Michigan Asset Management Council. PASER road rating system: The PASER road rating system was developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Transportation Information Center to be used as the State of Wisconsin s standard road rating system. Michigan s Asset Management Council has chosen this system also. PASER is a windshield road rating system that uses a 1 to 10 rating scale, with a value of 10 representing a new road and a value of 1 representing a failed road. Condition ratings are assigned by monitoring the type and amount of visual defects along a road segment while driving the segment. The PASER system interprets these observations into a condition rating. The State of Michigan Asset Management Council has requested that the information gathered in this survey be reported using the following categories: Roads with PASER ratings of 8-10 require Routine Maintenance. Routine maintenance is the day-to-day maintenance activities that are scheduled, such as street sweeping, drainage clearing, shoulder gravel grading, and sealing cracks, to prevent standing water and water penetration. Roads with PASER ratings of 5-7 require Capital Preventive Maintenance. Capital preventive maintenance is a planned set of cost effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves, retards future deterioration and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system without significantly increasing structural capacity. The purpose of capital preventive maintenance fixes is to protect the pavement structure, slow the rate of pavement deterioration and/or correct pavement surface deficiencies. Surface treatments are targeted at pavement surface defects primarily caused by the environment and by pavement material deficiencies. Roads with PASER ratings of 1-4 require Structural Improvements. This category includes work identified as rehabilitation and reconstruction which address the structural integrity of a road Asset Management Summary Page 11
14 Computer Equipment and Software: Staff collected data using a laptop computer with the RoadSoft GIS Laptop Data Collector software. A Garmin GPS unit was connected to the laptop to track position and locate road segments. RoadSoft GIS is an asset management software package created and distributed free of charge by the Michigan Technology Institute s Technology Development Group. The current version of the program was designed with a special module to collect PASER rating data. Staff Time: For the purpose of collecting PASER data, it is most efficient to have three people in the vehicle, one driver, one navigator/rater, and the third staff member who is assigned to enter information into the computer. For the Muskegon County road rating project, there was always one Region 14 representative, one MCRC representative, and one MDOT representative present. Training: All participants in the survey were required to attend a daylong training session. Participants received an overview of the project and were given instruction on how to use the RoadSoft software and the PASER road rating system for data collection. Once out in the field, experienced staff members taught the new participants how to use the RoadSoft program and guided them through the rating process. Most participants felt comfortable after an hour of working the computer and rating the roads. Results: Approximately 352 miles of federal-aid eligible roads were rated for this project. The following summarizes the distribution of ratings by mileage and percentage of the total for all roads rated in the project. The Asset Management Council has prescribed a fix for each of the PASER rating categories: - Roads receiving a rating of 8 or better require only Routine Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating of 5-7 require Capitol Preventative Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating less than or equal to 4 require Structural Improvements PASER Rating Prescribed Fix Miles / Percent of Total Miles Rated 1-4 Structural Improvements 54 miles (15%) 5-7 Capital Preventative Maintenance 233 miles (66%) 8-10 Routine Maintenance 65 miles (18%) 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 12
15 Muskegon County 2009 Federal Aid Road Survey Montague Twp Montague Blue Lake Twp Holton Twp Whitehall Twp Whitehall Lakewood Club Fruitland Twp Dalton Twp Cedar Creek Twp Laketon Twp Muskegon Twp Egelston Twp Moorland Twp Casnovia Twp North Muskegon Muskegon Muskegon Heights Roosevelt Park Norton Shores Fruitport Twp Sullivan Twp Ravenna Twp Ravenna Fruitport PASER Ratings 1-4 (Structural Improvements Needed) 5-7 (Capital Preventive Maintenance) 8-10 (Routine Maintenance) N W E S 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 13
16 Newaygo County Project overview: On June 22 nd and 23 rd, 2009, West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission (Region 14) staff, along with representatives of the Newaygo County Road Commission (NCRC) and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), assessed the condition of Newaygo County federal-aid eligible roads using the PASER road rating system, as requested by the State of Michigan Asset Management Council. PASER road rating system: The PASER road rating system was developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Transportation Information Center to be used as the State of Wisconsin s standard road rating system. Michigan s Asset Management Council has chosen this system also. PASER is a windshield road rating system that uses a 1 to 10 rating scale, with a value of 10 representing a new road and a value of 1 representing a failed road. Condition ratings are assigned by monitoring the type and amount of visual defects along a road segment while driving the segment. The PASER system interprets these observations into a condition rating. The State of Michigan Asset Management Council has requested that the information gathered in this survey be reported using the following categories: Roads with PASER ratings of 8-10 require Routine Maintenance. Routine maintenance is the day-to-day maintenance activities that are scheduled, such as street sweeping, drainage clearing, shoulder gravel grading, and sealing cracks, to prevent standing water and water penetration. Roads with PASER ratings of 5-7 require Capital Preventive Maintenance. Capital preventive maintenance is a planned set of cost effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves, retards future deterioration and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system without significantly increasing structural capacity. The purpose of capital preventive maintenance fixes is to protect the pavement structure, slow the rate of pavement deterioration and/or correct pavement surface deficiencies. Surface treatments are targeted at pavement surface defects primarily caused by the environment and by pavement material deficiencies. Roads with PASER ratings of 1-4 require Structural Improvements. This category includes work identified as rehabilitation and reconstruction which address the structural integrity of a road Asset Management Summary Page 14
17 Computer Equipment and Software: Staff collected data using a laptop computer with the RoadSoft GIS Laptop Data Collector software. A Garmin GPS unit was connected to the laptop to track position and locate road segments. RoadSoft GIS is an asset management software package created and distributed free of charge by the Michigan Technology Institute s Technology Development Group. The current version of the program was designed with a special module to collect PASER rating data. Staff Time: For the purpose of collecting PASER data, it is most efficient to have three people in the vehicle, one driver, one navigator/rater, and the third staff member who is assigned to enter information into the computer. For the Newaygo County road rating project, there was always one Region 14 representative, one NCRC representative, and one MDOT representative present. Training: All participants in the survey were required to attend a daylong training session. Participants received an overview of the project and were given instruction on how to use the RoadSoft software and the PASER road rating system for data collection. Once out in the field, experienced staff members taught the new participants how to use the RoadSoft program and guided them through the rating process. Most participants felt comfortable after an hour of working the computer and rating the roads. Results: Approximately 235 miles of federal-aid eligible roads were rated for this project. The following summarizes the distribution of ratings by mileage and percentage of the total for all roads rated in the project. The Asset Management Council has prescribed a fix for each of the PASER rating categories: - Roads receiving a rating of 8 or better require only Routine Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating of 5-7 require Capitol Preventative Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating less than or equal to 4 require Structural Improvements PASER Rating Prescribed Fix Miles / Percent of Total Miles Rated 1-4 Structural Improvements 122 miles (52%) 5-7 Capital Preventative Maintenance 95 miles (40%) 8-10 Routine Maintenance 18 miles (8%) 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 15
18 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 16
19 Oceana County Project overview: On June 24 th and 25 th, 2009, West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission (Region 14) staff, along with representatives of the Oceana County Road Commission (OCRC) and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), assessed the condition of Oceana County federal-aid eligible roads using the PASER road rating system, as requested by the State of Michigan Asset Management Council. PASER road rating system: The PASER road rating system was developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Transportation Information Center to be used as the State of Wisconsin s standard road rating system. Michigan s Asset Management Council has chosen this system also. PASER is a windshield road rating system that uses a 1 to 10 rating scale, with a value of 10 representing a new road and a value of 1 representing a failed road. Condition ratings are assigned by monitoring the type and amount of visual defects along a road segment while driving the segment. The PASER system interprets these observations into a condition rating. The State of Michigan Asset Management Council has requested that the information gathered in this survey be reported using the following categories: Roads with PASER ratings of 8-10 require Routine Maintenance. Routine maintenance is the day-to-day maintenance activities that are scheduled, such as street sweeping, drainage clearing, shoulder gravel grading, and sealing cracks, to prevent standing water and water penetration. Roads with PASER ratings of 5-7 require Capital Preventive Maintenance. Capital preventive maintenance is a planned set of cost effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves, retards future deterioration and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system without significantly increasing structural capacity. The purpose of capital preventive maintenance fixes is to protect the pavement structure, slow the rate of pavement deterioration and/or correct pavement surface deficiencies. Surface treatments are targeted at pavement surface defects primarily caused by the environment and by pavement material deficiencies. Roads with PASER ratings of 1-4 require Structural Improvements. This category includes work identified as rehabilitation and reconstruction which address the structural integrity of a road Asset Management Summary Page 17
20 Computer Equipment and Software: Staff collected data using a laptop computer with the RoadSoft GIS Laptop Data Collector software. A Garmin GPS unit was connected to the laptop to track position and locate road segments. RoadSoft GIS is an asset management software package created and distributed free of charge by the Michigan Technology Institute s Technology Development Group. The current version of the program was designed with a special module to collect PASER rating data. Staff Time: For the purpose of collecting PASER data, it is most efficient to have three people in the vehicle, one driver, one navigator/rater, and the third staff member who is assigned to enter information into the computer. For the Oceana County road rating project, there was always one Region 14 representative, one OCRC representative, and one MDOT representative present. Training: All participants in the survey were required to attend a daylong training session. Participants received an overview of the project and were given instruction on how to use the RoadSoft software and the PASER road rating system for data collection. Once out in the field, experienced staff members taught the new participants how to use the RoadSoft program and guided them through the rating process. Most participants felt comfortable after an hour of working the computer and rating the roads. Results: Approximately 201 miles of federal-aid eligible roads were rated for this project. The following summarizes the distribution of ratings by mileage and percentage of the total for all roads rated in the project. The Asset Management Council has prescribed a fix for each of the PASER rating categories: - Roads receiving a rating of 8 or better require only Routine Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating of 5-7 require Capitol Preventative Maintenance - Roads receiving a rating of 1 to 4 require Structural Improvements PASER Rating Prescribed Fix Miles / Percent of Total Miles Rated 1-4 Structural Improvements 137 miles (68%) 5-7 Capital Preventative Maintenance 29 miles (14%) 8-10 Routine Maintenance 35 miles (17%) 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 18
21 2009 Asset Management Summary Page 19
22 316 Morris Avenue - Suite PO Box Muskegon, MI Telephone: 231/ Fax: 231/ [email protected]
The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Genesee County
The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Genesee County Prepared by the Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Staff The State of Michigan Transportation
Transportation Infrastructure Asset Management
2015 NW Region TTAP& BIA Symposium Transportation Infrastructure Asset Management March, 2015 Happy Longfellow, PE [email protected] (206) 394-3649 ASSET MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW What? Why? How? Inventory
Asset Management Guide for Local Agencies in Michigan
Asset Management Guide for Local Agencies in Michigan sponsored by Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. revised by Michigan s Local Technical Assistance
Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating. Manual RATING RATING RATING PASER RATING. Concrete Roads
Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating PASER Manual Concrete Roads RATING 10 RATING 7 RATING 4 RATING 1 Contents Introduction 2 Rigid pavement performance 2 Pavement conditions and defects 3 Evaluation
DRAFT MAINTAINING HOUSTON S STREETS REPAIR, REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION. Using the Full Range of Tools for a Challenging Job
MAINTAINING HOUSTON S STREETS REPAIR, REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION Using the Full Range of Tools for a Challenging Job Report To: TTI Committee May 13, 2014 1 Pavement Management - Suggested Treatments
APPENDIX B. I. Background Information
APPENDIX B GUIDELINES FOR IDENTIFYING AND REPAIRING LOCALIZED AREAS OF DISTRESS IN AC PAVEMENTS PRIOR TO CAPITAL PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OR REHABILITATION REPAIRS I. Background Information A. AC Pavement
Why Maintain Your Asphalt?
Asphalt Maintenance Why Maintain Your Asphalt? Asphalt pavement is basically sand, gravel and glue. The glue used to keep the sand and gravel together is asphalt, a heavy by-product of oil refining. While
Types of Data. Features. Getting Started. Integrated Roadway Asset Management System
3-2014 GIS-based Asset Management System Optimize Maintenance Manage Signs Analyze Safety Roadsoft is a roadway management system for collecting, storing, and analyzing data associated with transportation
Asset Management Plan for Pavements PREPARED BY: MECOSTA COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
Asset Management Plan for Pavements PREPARED BY: MECOSTA COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION 2015 Table of Contents 1 Current Assets... 4 1.1 Asset Inventory... 4 1.2 Componentized Asset Inventory... 7 1.3 Current
RANDOM/GRID BLOCK CRACKING EXTREME SEVERITY. Transverse Cracking- Extreme Severity. Alligator Cracking- High. Severity
RANDOM/GRID BLOCK CRACKING EXTREME SEVERITY Transverse Cracking- Extreme Severity Slab Cracking Class II Regular Joint- High Severity Pattern Cracking-High Severity Alligator Cracking- High Severity Shoulder
Decision Matrix for Pavement Preservation. Mike Mamlouk Arizona State University
Decision Matrix for Pavement Preservation Mike Mamlouk Arizona State University Outline 1. Concept of preventive maintenance 2. Effectiveness of treatments 3. Treatment selection 2 Pavement Pavement Preservation
Pavement Management Implementation: Success Stories for Maryland Counties
Pavement Management Implementation: Success Stories for Maryland Counties September 25, 2015 Aaron D. Gerber, P.E. How Does Your Organization Manage Pavement Assets? By Experience/Past Practice? By Customer
CID STREET INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
ABSTRACT An evaluation of the street infrastructure in Foxberry Estates Phase 1, including pavement condition, verification of construction techniques, and subgrade quality. Recommendations and costs for
Airfield Pavement Rehabilitation Planning Choosing the right fix. Rob McLure, M.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Associate Hatch Mott MacDonald
Airfield Pavement Rehabilitation Planning Choosing the right fix Rob McLure, M.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Associate Hatch Mott MacDonald Presentation Objective ¾ Review the pavement rehabilitation strategy development
CHAPTER 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CHAPTER 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 2.1. INTRODUCTION TO PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT The ability of a pavement system to serve a society is largely a function of planning. Planning is the intersection between
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON
Council Meeting Date: August 11, 2014 Agenda Item: 7(c) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON AGENDA TITLE: Motion Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Transmap Corporation
Cornell Asset Management Program - Roads & Streets (CAMP-RS) 2014
Cornell Asset Management Program - Roads & Streets (CAMP-RS) 2014 Distributed by: Cornell Local Roads Program CLRP No. 14-01 Table of Contents 1 - Introduction to Cornell Asset Management Roads & Streets
SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.
Page 1 Revised 3/2/10 See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway. For New/Reconstruction projects: The cross slope of the driving lanes range from 1.5% to
Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating Study (PASER)
Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating Study (PASER) For the City of Flat Rock Prepared by the C. E. Raines Company April 21, 2014 Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. III. IV. Network Characteristics.3
Pavement Patching Repair for AC and PCC Pavement Surfaces. Vern Thompson www.crafco.com
Pavement Patching Repair for AC and PCC Pavement Surfaces Vern Thompson www.crafco.com Overview and Objective New Methods For Pavement Patching-Overview What are they How they are applied New Methods Secti
Road Asset Management
Road Asset Management Raja Shekharan, Ph.D., P.E. Virginia Department of Transportation National Workshop on Modern Trends in Pavement Engineering IISc, Bangalore July 15, 2011 Transportation Asset Management
Pavement Management Systems
Pavement Management Systems Presented by Bill Weiss, P.E. Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. (APTech) At the 2015 Municipal Streets Seminar Ames, Iowa Why Pavement Management??? Pavements are expensive
Pavement Management Program
Pavement Management Program 2014 Street Maintenance Program Executive Summary 01/21/2014 Presented by Mark Thiel Assistant Director of Public Works Program Overview Start of current program 2005 825.1
Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan
Township of Enniskillen Asset Management Plan 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Introduction 3 B. State of Local Infrastructure 4 C. Desired Levels of Service 7 D. Asset Management Strategy 8 E. Financing
COST EFFECTIVE ROAD MAINTENANCE MARCH 2015
COST EFFECTIVE ROAD MAINTENANCE MARCH 2015 According to the University of New Hampshire technology transfer Center the goal of a Road Surface Management Plan should be the following: Maximize Return on
Chapter 7: Pavement Rehabilitation 7-1 Asphalt Pavement Overlays 7-1 Surface Preparation Methods 7-2 Concrete Pavement Preparation 7-3 Recycling
7-1 Asphalt Pavement Overlays 7-1 Surface Preparation Methods 7-2 Concrete Pavement Preparation 7-3 Recycling Asphalt Pavements 7-7 Chapter 7 Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement rehabilitation can be accomplished
Impacts of Increased Loading Due to Heavy Construction Traffic on Thin Pavements
Impacts of Increased Loading Due to Heavy Construction Traffic on Thin Pavements Author: Harry Sturm, P. Eng. Stantec Consulting Ltd. 16-77 Mississauga Road Mississauga, ON L5N 7G2 Phone: (95) 817-296
Monitoring Highway Assets with Remote Technology
Monitoring Highway Assets with Remote Technology For the Michigan Department of Transportation July 2013 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Project Scope Summary of Technologies Aerial Imagery with LiDAR Mobile
KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS I. GENERAL The following policy shall apply when the intent of the project is to
Pavement Rehabilitation Using Hot Mix Asphalt. - National Perspective -
Pavement Rehabilitation Using Hot Mix Asphalt - National Perspective - Rehabilitation Process Evaluate Existing Pavement and Conditions Evaluate Options Construct Project Monitor Performance Evaluate Existing
The Roads to Recovery. Facts About Transportation Funding and Spending
The Roads to Recovery Facts About Transportation Funding and Spending How Pima County spends transportation money (F.Y. 2014-15 Transportation Budget) 1 Debt Service (1997 bonds): $19.1 million In 1997,
STANDARDIZED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE STATE AND CONDITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN EDMONTON
STANDARDIZED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE STATE AND CONDITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN EDMONTON Theresa Cloake, P.Eng. Infrastructure Analyst and K.L. Siu, P.Eng. Senior Infrastructure Officer Office
Road Asset Management Research Program In Finland
Langfassung / long version Road Asset Management Research Program In Finland Abstract Mr. Vesa Männistö, M.Sc. (Statistics) Inframan Ltd Länsituulentie 10, 02100 Espoo, Finland Tel +358-9-8567 7715, fax
Expected Service Life and Performance Characteristics of HMA Pavements in LTPP
Expected Service Life and Performance Characteristics of HMA Pavements in LTPP Expected Service Life and Performance Characteristics of HMA Pavements in LTPP Submitted to: Asphalt Pavement Alliance Prepared
Cost Considerations of In-Place Recycling as a Pavement Rehabilitation Alternative Brian Diefenderfer, PhD, PE Alex Apeagyei, PhD, PE
Cost Considerations of In-Place Recycling as a Pavement Rehabilitation Alternative Brian Diefenderfer, PhD, PE Alex Apeagyei, PhD, PE A partnership of the Virginia Department of Transportation and the
For Asset Management
For Asset Management By: Larry Weiss SDLTAP It Begins with Accurate Inventory Inventory of existing system: The Local Roads Needs Study conducted in Aug/Sept of 08 indicated by it s results and from LTAP
I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation
I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation Fall Asphalt Conference Richmond, VA David Shiells, P.E. Virginia Department of Transportation David White Superior Paving Corporation October 2, 2012 Project Location 2 Goal
DISTRESS IDENTIFICATION MANUAL. for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program
DISTRESS IDENTIFICATION MANUAL for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-RD-03-031 JUNE 2003 In 1987, the Strategic Highway Research Program began the largest and most comprehensive
A Pavement Management System for County Roads
A Pavement Management System for County Roads By Michael D. Anderson and Jeffery P. Wilson Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, Alabama
USE OF A DIGITAL SURVEY VEHICLE FOR PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS AT AIRPORTS. Paul W. Wilke, P.E. Applied Research Associates, Inc.
USE OF A DIGITAL SURVEY VEHICLE FOR PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS AT AIRPORTS Paul W. Wilke, P.E. Applied Research Associates, Inc. August 11, 2014 Words: 3,280 Figures: 3 Tables: 0 Photographs: 3 ABSTRACT
Automated Pavement Distress Survey: A Review and A New Direction
Automated Pavement Distress Survey: A Review and A New Direction KELVIN C.P. WANG AND WEIGUO GONG 4190 Bell Engineering Civil Engineering University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 Email: [email protected]
Local Road Assessment and Improvement Drainage Manual
Local Road Assessment and Improvement Drainage Manual Donald Walker, T.I.C. Director, author Lynn Entine, Entine & Associates, editor Susan Kummer, Artifax, design Transportation Information Center University
RoadMatrix V3.1 has incorporated many engineering enhancements including the following:
What s New in V3.1? RoadMatrix V3.1 has incorporated many engineering enhancements including the following: 1. Extended Programming Period The analysis programming period has increased from 10 to 100 years.
A. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CHAPTER 9 PAVEMENT A. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM A Pavement Management System (PMS) is a systematic process that collects and analyzes roadway pavement information for use in selecting cost-effective strategies
IMPLEMENTING PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR LOCAL AGENCIES
IMPLEMENTING PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR LOCAL AGENCIES IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE Prepared By Angela Wolters, P.E. Katie Zimmerman, P.E. Dr. Kerrie Schattler, Ph. D. Ashley Rietgraf A synthesis of ICT R27
Pavement Management Program
Pavement Management Program 2013 Street Maintenance Program Executive Summary 1/15/2013 Presented by Mark Thiel Assistant Director Public Works Program Overview Start of current program 2005 812.5 Lane
The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan
The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan December 013 Adopted by Council March 4, 014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION....1 Vision.... What is Asset Management?....3 Link to
CHAPTER 2 LCCA APPROACHES
2.1 LCCA Basis CHAPTER 2 LCCA APPROACHES When making decisions about pavement design, LCCA: Compares pavement alternatives; and Identifies the best strategy based on current information as well as meeting
Sewer Rehabilitation Design Requirements
Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Control and Wastewater Facilities Program Sewer Rehabilitation Design Requirements City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge Department of Public Works Submitted by Prepared
Pavement Maintenance M A N U A L. Mike Johanns Governor. John Craig Director
Pavement Maintenance M A N U A L Mike Johanns Governor John Craig Director Pavement Maintenance Manual Acknowledgements........................................................................ii Introduction..............................................................................1
DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA. Hazim M Abdulwahid Abdullah Al Kahtani Mustafa Abdulaziz
DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA Hazim M Abdulwahid Abdullah Al Kahtani Mustafa Abdulaziz Contents Introduction Methodology Pavement Management System
Managing the Risk of Aging Pavement Infrastructure in New Brunswick Through Innovative Decision Making
Managing the Risk of Aging Pavement Infrastructure in New Brunswick Through Innovative Decision Making Jay Cunningham, MSc.Eng., P.Eng. New Brunswick Department of Transportation John MacNaughton, BSc.
Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program (SSATP) Output- and Performance-based Road Contracts (OPRC)
Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program (SSATP) Work in Progress and New Developments in RMF Output- and Performance-based Road Contracts (OPRC) (Based on presentations by Schliessler/Gericke WB) Olav
INITIAL SITE INSPECTION OF MOTORCYCLE COLLISIONS WITH ROADSIDE OBJECTS IN NEW JERSEY
INITIAL SITE INSPECTION OF MOTORCYCLE COLLISIONS WITH ROADSIDE OBJECTS IN NEW JERSEY Allison Daniello Ben Powell Nicholas Schaeffer Aaliyah McClinton Yusuf Mehta Rowan University United States Kimberly
Case Studies - Concrete Overlays
Case Studies - Concrete Overlays Lessons Learned - Concrete Overlays Purdue Road School March 6, 2013 Today s Topic 1. Overlays 2. New Full-depth 3. Pervious 4. Roller Compacted 5. Full Depth Patching
Status of Asset Management in the Roads Sector. L Kannemeyer
Status of Asset Management in the Roads Sector L Kannemeyer Why Asset Management? Road Condition 100 80 60 40 20 Good Fair Poor B A Very Poor (Typically Designed for Traffic Expected over 20-30 Years)
Pavement Management Office
Department of Transportation and Public Works Puerto Rico Pavement Management Office PAVEMENT PRESERVATION SEPPP 1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES PRHTA has been collecting data for more than twenty (20) years with
Road Asset Management vs Pavement Management A new Paradigm. Arthur Taute Stewart Russell
Road Asset Management vs Pavement Management A new Paradigm Arthur Taute Stewart Russell Contents Background Definitions Improvements over PMS TMH22 elements Conclusions BACKGROUND Municipal AMS GRAP17
TAMS 2.1 User s Manual. Utah LTAP Center. Contact: Utah LTAP 4111 Old Main Hill Logan, UT. 84322-4111 800-822-8878 www.utahltap.
TAMS 2.1 User s Manual Utah LTAP Center Contact: Utah LTAP 4111 Old Main Hill Logan, UT. 84322-4111 800-822-8878 www.utahltap.org Table of Contents Introduction 1 Initializing the program... 1 Data Needed
HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON ROAD SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND HIGH SPEED ROADS
HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON ROAD SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND HIGH SPEED ROADS Research & Development Division RD/GN/032 June 2007 1. Purpose ROAD SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPRESSWAYS
Louw Kannemeyer. Asset Management
Louw Kannemeyer Asset Management South African Road Network Authority Paved Gravel Total SANRAL 18,247 0 18,247 Provinces - 9 46,099 136,640 182,739 Metros - 8 51,682 14,461 66,143 Municipalities 37,691
Date: 10/10/2014 Initiated by: AAS-100
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Airport Pavement Management Program (PMP) Date: 10/10/2014 Initiated by: AAS-100 AC No: 150/5380-7B Change:
How To Manage The County Of Simcoe'S Infrastructure
Asset Management Plan Asset Management Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary... 2 2.0 Introduction... 4 3.0 State of County of Simcoe s Infrastructure... 7 4.0 Levels of Service... 14 5.0 Asset
Rehabilitation for Concrete Pavements
Rehabilitation for Concrete Pavements www.asphaltalliance.com Overview Effective rehab for PCC Break PCC into small segments Overlay with Hot Mix Asphalt Road-userfriendly Rubblize and pave in off-peak
SD95-16-G2. SD Department of Transportation Office of Research. Rural Road Design, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation Guide
SD95-16-G2 SD Department of Transportation Office of Research Rural Road Design, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation Guide Prepared by ERES Consultants, Inc. 505 West University Champaign, IL 61820-3915 September
SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF UNBOUND GRANULAR PAVEMENT LAYERS
TNZ B/02:2005 SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF UNBOUND 1. SCOPE This specification shall apply to the construction of unbound granular pavement layers. The term pavement layer shall apply to any layer
Guide to the Texas A&M Transportation Institute Mobile Retroreflectometer Certification Program
Guide to the Texas A&M Transportation Institute Mobile Retroreflectometer Certification Program Program Conducted by Texas A&M Transportation Institute In Cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation
Bridges & Culverts Condition by Quantity
3.4.3 What condition is it in? Approximately 93% of the municipality s bridge structures are in good to excellent condition, with the remaining 7% in fair condition. As a result, the municipality received
Asphaltic Wedge Paving
OFFICIAL NOTICE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Notice is hereby given by the Town of Oregon, Dane County, Wisconsin, will receive sealed bids for Road Construction as listed in this request until 4:00 P.M., Local
Draft TMH 22 ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT MANUAL
-- South Africa COTO Committee of Transport Officials Draft TMH 22 ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT MANUAL M a r c h 2013 C ommittee of Transport Officials Contents Background Process Contents of Manual Quo Vadis
INDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Plan
Chapter 9 INDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Plan Highway Needs Analysis Overview The statewide transportation planning process provides for the identification of highway needs through a comprehensive process
ASPHALT PAVEMENT RECYCLING
HOT IN-PLACE RECYCLING THE ENERGY SAVING METHOD ASPHALT PAVEMENT RECYCLING Hot In-Place alt ec cl n The Energy Saving Method! HIGHWAY REHAB CORP Highway Rehab Corp 2258 Route 22 Brewster, NY 10509 Tel
MODULE 3. Upon completion of this module the participants will be able to:
MODULE 3 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW 2.1 Module Objective This module describes the basic components of a Pavement Management System, as well as provides some historical perspective on the evolution
Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005
Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005 Purpose The purpose of this review is to capture for technical deployment the most advanced
Chapter 5: Drainage, Ditches, and Culverts
Chapter 5: Drainage, Ditches, and Culverts chapter contents Characteristics of Good Drainage 82 Elements of Good Surface Drainage 82 Crown 82 Shoulders 82 Slope 82 Ditches 83 Culverts 83 Inlets 83 Optimal
Minimizing Reflective Cracking With Applications of the Rolling Dynamic Deflectometer and Overlay Tester
Minimizing Reflective Cracking With Applications of the Rolling Dynamic Deflectometer and Overlay Tester Dar-Hao Chen, 1 Moon Won, 2 Tom Scullion, 3 and John Bilyeu 4 ABSTRACT Since reflective cracking
Local Agency Guidelines for Developing an Asset Management Process and Plan
Local Agency Guidelines for Developing an Asset Management Process and Plan May, 2011 SPONSORED BY: MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT COUNCIL MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PREPARED BY: OPUS
