ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
|
|
|
- Tyler Nash
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT Prepared for: Township of South Frontenac December 2013 RVA This report is protected by copyright and was prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Limited for the account of the City of Ottawa. The material in it reflects our best judgment in light of the information available to R.V. Anderson Associates Limited at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. R.V. Anderson Associates Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.
2 December 17, 2013 RVA Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street, Syndeham, ON, K0H 2T0 Attention: Re: Louise Fragnito, CGA, Treasurer - Township of South Frontenac REPORT R.V. Anderson Associates Limited (RVA) is pleased to submit herein our final report and Asset Management Plan. We appreciate very much the information and helpful assistance you and your colleagues provided to us during its preparation. The main finding of our report is that, like most small municipalities across Ontario, a significant backlog of worn out assets exists that needs to be addressed over the next 5-10 years, on a priority basis. However, the Township has taken important steps in increasing its contribution to reserves and investing in Asset Management software. As a result, the Township is, in our experience, in a much better position than many of the smaller municipalities we have worked with. These reserve funds should continue to be set aside for those assets that will be reaching the end of their useful life over the next years. We recommend the Township continue to assess asset conditions and replacement priorities on a programmed basis, as these determine revenue needs (capital and operational), and help prioritize capital projects in accordance with this AMP. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned at Yours very truly, R.V. ANDERSON ASSOCIATES LIMITED Trish Johnson, B.A., M.A., Associate Senior Environmental Consultant
3 Township of South Frontenac TOC 1-1 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION Provincial Guideline Vision for Infrastructure in the Township of South Frontenac Goals of Asset Management Scope of Development of the Refinement of the AMP STATE OF INFRASTRUCTURE Asset Inventory Asset Value Asset Condition Comparison to the Canadian National Report Card Asset Risk Refinements by Township Staff LEVELS OF SERVICE Condition Levels of Service Capacity Levels of Service Existing Levels of Service ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Asset Management Strategy Overview Managing Risk Long Term Infrastructure Capital Investment Needs Asset Management Strategies to Reduce Infrastructure Costs FINANCING STRATEGY Sources of Funding Short Term Financing Strategy Long Term Financing Strategy CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4 Township of South Frontenac TOC 1-2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Township of South Frontenac Figure 2 Asset Value Distribution Figure 3 Distribution of Asset Condition Figure 4 Risk Matrix Figure 5 Distribution of Asset Risk Figure 6 10 Year Capital Investment Needs Figure Year Capital Investment Needs LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Inventory of Assets Table 2 Value of Assets by Asset Class Table 3 - Estimated Condition Based on Useful Life Remaining Table 4 Value of Assets by Condition Score Table 5 Probability of Failure Score Table 6 Consequence of Failure Score Information Table 7 - Risk Score by Asset Value Table 8 Typical Service Levels and Performance Metrics for Small Municipalities Table 9 Renewal Strategy based on Risk Table 10 Renewal Strategy for Medium to Low Road and Storm Sewer Assets Table 11 Short Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Table 12 Short Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) Table 13 Long Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Table 14 Adjusted Long Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Table 15 Long Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A Township of South Frontenac Map APPENDIX B Information and Assumptions used to Develop Long Term and Prioritized Short Term Renewal Needs APPENDIX C Detailed State of the Infrastructure Analysis
5 Township of South Frontenac ES 1-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Province now requires that any municipality seeking provincial capital funding for infrastructure projects prepare an (AMP) to demonstrate the need of each project within its social, economic or environmental priorities. This report represents the Township of South Frontenac s first iteration of a strategic AMP based on current infrastructure information. The asset inventory currently includes roads, bridges and culverts, water treatment and storage facilities, water mains, and storm sewers. The key components of the asset inventory are illustrated on the following page. The Township currently owns and operates approximately $300 million of infrastructure, and other assets will be added to the plan as more data is gathered. Like most small municipalities across Ontario, a portion of assets are in poor or critical condition. South Frontenac has slightly more assets in poor and critical condition than the national average. These assets should be addressed over the next 10 years, on a priority basis. Over the next 100 years, the Township should spend an average of $9.5 million per year for asset rehabilitation and replacement. For water assets, there will be sufficient funds to cover capital expenditures through Water User Fees in the short term (10 years). In the long term (100 years), an annual increase of 0.12%, above inflation adjustments, will be required to raise sufficient funds for renewing water assets. The current Municipal Tax Levy is insufficient to finance forecasted expenditures in the short term for tax supported assets. An annual increase of 5% over the next 10 years would be required to avoid a deficit at the end of the decade. By taking a longer term view, this Tax Levy increase can be reduced. The Township has recently approved an increase of 1%, compounded yearly. Over the next 100 years, the Tax Supported Capital Levy coupled with the 1% Asset Investment Reserve and inflation adjustments is sufficient to finance AMP expenditures. The Township is in a better position financially than many municipalities in Ontario. South Frontenac has taken a proactive approach in addressing infrastructure needs by setting aside reserve funds to minimize deficits and by investing in Cartegraph to better understand transportation asset condition, risk and replacement needs. This strategy positions the Township of South Frontenac on a path to sound asset management.
6 Township of South Frontenac ES 1-2
7 Township of South Frontenac INTRODUCTION This report represents the Township of South Frontenac s first (AMP), based on current data and information on the Township s transportation and water infrastructure. The Township intends to continually improve this AMP over the coming years as additional information is collected and as its knowledge of asset condition increases. The Township of South Frontenac is located in Eastern Ontario in Frontenac County, bounded by the City of Kingston and the Townships of Stone Mills, Central Frontenac and Rideau Lakes (Figure 1). The Township has a population of 18,100 1 and covers an area of 972 km 2. Sydenham is the only area in which water servicing is available. Refer to Appendix A for a detailed map of the Township. Figure 1 Township of South Frontenac 1 Statistics Canada. (2012). Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census.
8 Township of South Frontenac Provincial Guideline In 2010, Ontario s Ministry of Infrastructure released a guide titled Building Together: Guide for Municipal s. This guide forms part of a comprehensive strategy called the Municipal Infrastructure Investment Initiative (MIII) intended to develop a cooperative relationship between municipalities and the Province of Ontario to address our deteriorating infrastructure. The Province seeks to achieve standardization and consistency in the management of municipal infrastructure by requiring any municipality applying for provincial capital funding to prepare an AMP that demonstrates the particular need of the project within the social, economic or environmental priorities of the community. 1.2 Vision for Infrastructure in the Township of South Frontenac In 2003, the Township of South Frontenac adopted its latest Official Plan, with minor amendments in As part of this Plan, a Vision Statement was developed to guide the growth of the Township: South Frontenac is an amalgamation of communities whose common goals have brought them together for mutual co-operation. The Official Plan provides a framework for directing South Frontenac s growth in a manner which will preserve the Township s environmental integrity while enhancing both its rural character and its long-term economic viability. Although the Plan was primarily developed to guide new development in the Township, the same principles are also relevant to the management of South Frontenac s infrastructure. The following points highlight some of the key goals and objectives presented in the Official Plan relating to asset management: Require adequate and efficient systems of water supply, sanitary sewage disposal, storm drainage and waste disposal to all areas of development in the Township and to co-ordinate development with the Township s ability to provide adequate physical and community services; and Provide an efficient and cost-effective transportation network that optimizes the movement of people and goods throughout the Township. 2 Township of South Frontenac. (2003). Official Plan, Updated 2013.
9 Township of South Frontenac 1-3 The Township s Strategic Plan 3 provides a clear directive to provide high quality services to residents through a series of goals. The following goals provide a vision for the management of the Township s infrastructure and have helped to guide the development of this Plan: 1. Develop a policy framework for managing growth, the planning process and the demand for services. o Provide clear direction and consistency to those engaging with the Township's planning process. o Manage growth with a long-term plan rather than short-term ad hoc decisions. 2. Consolidated Capital Plan. o Complete an inventory of capital assets and a needs assessment to manage infrastructure, halls/facilities, property waste sites and equipment. o Look at options for multi-year budget planning, including provincial/federal funding opportunities, various formulas for building reserves to replace assets, and long-term financing instruments such as bonds and debentures. o The review should include a look at access and other policies, especially in the context of liability assessments. 1.3 Goals of Asset Management Asset Management strives to continually improve the Township s infrastructure. The following are a list of goals that asset management programs and processes aim to achieve: Optimize life cycle costs (i.e. total operating, maintenance and capital resources) of providing services to residents; Reduce risk exposure by ensuring that assets are managed by recognizing the risk that their failure represents to the delivery of services; Informed and transparent decision making processes integrating capital expenditures, operating costs and revenue requirements (i.e. rate and tax levels); and Mechanisms to ensure that the infrastructure services are delivered at a sustainable and affordable level to residents. 3 Township of South Frontenac. (2013). Strategic Plan.
10 Township of South Frontenac Scope of This AMP developed for South Frontenac covers a period of 100 years and reports on the following assets owned by the Township: Roads; Water mains and water distribution Bridges and culverts; system appurtenances; and Water treatment and storage facilities; Storm sewers. The Township is responsible for other assets including buildings, fleet, sidewalks, street lighting, land, among others, which will be added to the AMP as data gathered for these assets becomes more complete. The Township does not own any wastewater infrastructure or social housing assets. 1.5 Development of the This AMP was developed by RVA with assistance from Township staff. The following documents were reviewed and incorporated throughout the development of this AMP: Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (2003) Township of South Frontenac Strategic Plan Municipal Budgets and other Financial Documents South Frontenac Township By-Law O/Reg 239/02 for the Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways The Township has recently invested in Cartegraph, an asset management system which will help guide their decisions for roads, bridges and culverts. Information on these assets, including condition, age and value, was sourced from this database. Water asset information was based on historical records from the Township. 1.6 Refinement of the AMP This AMP is a first step in achieving the Township s goals. The Township will also develop an Implementation Strategy that will improve subsequent iterations of the AMP using performance and condition information that is obtained
11 Township of South Frontenac STATE OF INFRASTRUCTURE This section summarizes the state of the Township s infrastructure, including: Inventory of all assets; Value of the assets; and Risk assessment, based on probability of failure and consequence of failure. 2.1 Asset Inventory The asset inventory for South Frontenac includes transportation assets (roads, bridges and culverts), water assets (water treatment plant, storage facility, and water mains), and storm sewers. Table 1 Table 1 Inventory of Assets provides a summary of the assets included in the scope of this study. Other assets including buildings, Asset Class Roads Inventory 815 km Bridges & Culverts 61 vehicles, leaseholds, and other equipment will be WTP & Storage 1.3 ML/d added to the asset management inventory over the Water Mains 6.4 km coming years as additional information is collected and Storm Sewers 3 km as knowledge of the condition of assets increases. 2.2 Asset Value Asset value was based on both historical costs and typical unit costs provided by the Township, detailed in Appendix B. Asset valuation is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 Value of Assets by Asset Class Asset Class Cost % of Total Assets Roads $269,691,000 88% Bridges & Culverts $25,200,815 8% WTP & Storage $6,416,581 2% Water Mains $3,317,202 1% Storm Sewers $2,759,485 1% Total $307,385, % The Township currently owns and operates $307 million of transportation and water assets. Roads represent 88% of the total value of the Township s in-scope assets, followed by bridges & culverts (8%). A graphical depiction of asset distribution is shown in Figure 2.
12 Township of South Frontenac 2-6 Bridges & Culverts, $25,200,815 Water Facilities, $6,416,581 Roads, $269,691,000 Water mains, $3,317,202 Storm Sewers, $2,759,485 Remaining Assets, Value TBD Figure 2 Asset Value Distribution Note that the Township is responsible for other assets that were not included in the AMP but will be incorporated in future updates to the plan as more information is gathered. Total replacement value of these assets is unknown at this time. 2.3 Asset Condition Understanding the condition of the Township s assets is an essential component in an AMP. Ideally, condition information is based on assessment activities that provide first-hand knowledge of the infrastructure. Condition information was available for transportation assets and storm sewers in South Frontenac. Water assets are relatively new, and more information will be collected over time as inspections are conducted Transportation and Stormwater Assets Actual condition information was available for roads, bridges and culverts, and storm sewers in South Frontenac. The Township tracks transportation assets using Cartegraph, including asset condition, historical and current value, and location. Asset condition for roads was based on the
13 Township of South Frontenac 2-7 Overall Condition Index (OCI) evaluated during the road inspections conducted in Asset condition for bridges and culverts was based on the Bridge Condition Index (BCI) from the most recent Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) reports from inspections conducted in 2012 and Asset condition for storm sewers was based on structural grade evaluated during sewer inspections conducted in November Appendix B details how the condition assessment information for these asset types were converted to a condition score Water Assets Condition information was not available for the water treatment plant, the water storage facility or water mains. Therefore, asset condition was estimated by evaluating the amount of useful life remaining. The water treatment plant, storage tower and water mains were all constructed in 2005 with plant upgrades completed in The amount of useful life remaining was based on present age and typical useful life, summarized in Table 3. All of these assets were found to have over 80% of useful life remaining; therefore, it was assumed that they are all in excellent condition. Table 3 - Estimated Condition Based on Useful Life Remaining Asset Description Year Constructed Typical Useful Life (Years) Percent of Useful Life Remaining Estimated Condition Raw Water Intake % Excellent Elevated Water Storage Tower % Excellent Treatment Plant % Excellent Plant Upgrades (UV & GAC contactors) % Excellent Water Mains % Excellent This approach provides sufficient condition information for analysis, and can be updated as knowledge of these assets increases Asset Condition Summary Table 4 summarizes the condition of the Township s infrastructure. Approximately $11 million worth of assets are nearing the end of their useful life and are considered in critical condition.
14 Township of South Frontenac 2-8 Table 4 Value of Assets by Condition Score Condition Score Cost % of Total Assets Excellent $98,887,520 32% Good $89,559,038 29% Fair $73,225,575 24% Poor $34,991,075 11% Critical $10,721,875 4% Total $307,385, % Approximately 15% of assets are in poor or critical condition. Figure 3 shows the value distribution of assets by condition graphically. Assets in critical and poor condition include a portion of the roads, bridges and culverts, and storm sewers. $120,000,000 $100,000,000 Asset Condition Water Facilities Water mains Storm Sewers Bridges & Culverts Roads $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 Excellent Good Fair Poor Critical Figure 3 Distribution of Asset Condition
15 Township of South Frontenac Comparison to the Canadian National Report Card In September 2012, a consortium comprised of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, the Canadian Pubic Works Association, the Canadian Construction Association and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities released the inaugural Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 4. This document included a summary of the State of infrastructure for 123 municipalities who responded to a survey. The National Report Card reported that approximately 9% of the road, water, wastewater and storm water assets in municipalities across Canada are in poor or critical condition. The analysis of the Township of South Frontenac infrastructure indicates that 15% of these assets are in poor or critical condition, slightly above the national average. 2.5 Asset Risk The state of infrastructure is not only defined by its physical condition but also by its function and the consequence of failure. To achieve a better understanding of the Township s needs, a risk score was calculated for each asset. For example, an asset with a low consequence of failure can be managed such that it is replaced only after it fails. However, assets that have a high consequence of failure should be managed in a proactive manner that does not permit the condition to fall below poor. For the purposes of this AMP report, risk was defined as the product of the probability of failure and the consequence of failure, with additional consideration for Health and Safety risk. The Township currently tracks risk of transportation assets through Cartegraph. The system incorporates parameters to evaluate the condition of assets and includes a preventative strategy to extend the life of assets, such as crack sealing. It also considers related assets including sidewalks and storm sewers in planning replacement work. The Township will continue to optimize the strategy used in this system to extend useful life of assets and employ a preventative maintenance strategy. 4
16 Township of South Frontenac Probability of Failure A probability of failure score was given to each asset based on the condition rating in Section 2.3. Although the probability of an asset failing is not necessarily indicative of its age (e.g. some newer water mains can fail more frequently than older water mains due to their production methods), sufficient records are not yet available to track failure history of assets. This can also be addressed in future updates of the AMP. Table 5 summarizes the probability of failure score that was assigned to each asset based on the estimate of its physical condition and age. Table 5 Probability of Failure Score Estimated Condition Probability of Failure Description Probability of Failure Score Excellent Improbable 1 Good Unlikely 2 Fair Possible 3 Poor Likely 4 Critical Highly Probable Consequence of Failure The consequence of failure score for each asset was based on a review of information that was provided by the Township, such as: Size/capacity/cost of the asset; Location of the asset; The use of the asset; and The importance of the asset to the operation of the system/facility. Table 6 summarizes the approach used to establish consequence of failure scores.
17 Township of South Frontenac 2-11 Table 6 Consequence of Failure Score Information Consequence of Failure Description Consequence of Failure Score Very low measureable effect of any kind 1 Low/ seldom/marginal impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment Moderate/ regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment Major/ regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment Catastrophic loss of infrastructure affecting public safety or having severe environmental consequences Roads were assigned consequence of failure scores ranging from 3 to 5. Roads in school zones or adjacent to fire halls were assigned a score of 5 to reflect a high consequence of failure. Arterial roads were also given a score of 5, collector roads were given a score of 4, and local roads were given a score of 3. Bridges and culverts located along arterial roads were given a higher score than those along local and collector roads. The water treatment plant was assigned a score of 5 as failure at the plant would affect water quality in the distribution system and a treated water supply would not be available. Refer to Appendix B for further detail Risk Assessment A risk score between 1 and 25 was calculated for each asset by multiplying consequence of failure scores and probability of failure scores. A third factor, Health & Safety Risk, was also considered. Assets with known safety risks were noted and given higher priority for replacement. This could include consideration for roads with high pedestrian traffic where no sidewalks exist, and roads with high vehicle collisions counts due to poor sightlines, among others. The Township will continue to update this rating as priority areas become known. A risk category was established for each asset based on risk score. Figure 4 summarizes the process that was used to categorize risk score into the following categories:
18 Township of South Frontenac represents low level risk; 4-6 represents medium-low level risk; 8-9 represents medium level risk; represents medium-high level risk; represents a high level of risk. Consequence Probability of Failure Table 7 summarizes the risk scores of the Figure 4 Risk Matrix assets in the Township. Approximately 8% ($26 million) of assets have a high level of risk. Another 23% ($69 million) of the Township s assets have a risk score of medium-high. Table 7 - Risk Score by Asset Value Risk Cost % of Assets Low $50,046,316 16% Medium-Low $105,952,154 35% Medium $56,113,338 18% Medium-High $69,067,550 23% High $26,205,725 8% Total $307,385, % High risk assets should be addressed in the near term (5 years) to reduce the risk exposure to the Township and medium-high risk assets should be addressed in the short term (5-10 years). Some assets may require early upgrading if health and safety factors pose a risk. Similarly, the Township may be able to delay the replacement of other assets if a higher level of risk can be accepted. The Township will consider a number of factors when prioritizing asset replacement and upgrades. Section 4 of this report describes the Asset Management Strategy suggested for addressing assets that represent elevated levels of risk. Risk distribution is summarized in Figure 5.
19 Township of South Frontenac 2-13 Risk Distribution $120,000,000 $100,000,000 Bridges & Culverts Water mains WTP & Storage Storm Sewers Roads $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 Low Medium-Low Medium Medium-High High Figure 5 Distribution of Asset Risk 2.6 Refinements by Township Staff The condition, consequence of failure, and risk scores were reviewed with Township staff who utilized their knowledge of the Township s infrastructure to refine the scores as much as possible. The Township recognizes that the general approach and individual risk scores for each asset will be refined over the coming years as more information becomes available.
20 Township of South Frontenac LEVELS OF SERVICE A level of service is a term that is used to describe how much of a service is being provided or the quality of a service that is being provided. In the context of asset management, levels of service are established as a way to guide the management of infrastructure in a manner that aims to achieve a level of service goal. Levels of service in smaller townships can vary widely related to finances, federal/provincial regulations, customer expectations, and/or corporate vision. In terms of Township infrastructure, the services provided are especially related to operation and maintenance cost and/or development and growth consideration. This section of the AMP gives an overview of service levels based on the Township s existing documentation and current infrastructure management practices. The levels of service are often informal and undocumented. 3.1 Condition Levels of Service The most basic level of service is to maintain infrastructure in an acceptable state of repair and minimize the risk exposure of the Township to an acceptable level. The capital works planning process usually addresses the infrastructure that is in the worst state of repair and would result in significant consequences if it were to fail, based on coordination among department managers and Council. The current capital planning process used by the Township does represent a risk-based approach to managing infrastructure and this AMP provides a more formalized approach to help develop this process. 3.2 Capacity Levels of Service Provincial policies and regulations define some minimum levels of service for water and transportation, including Ontario Regulation 239/02 (Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways) 5 and Ontario Regulation 170/03 (Drinking Water Systems) 6. Similar to most municipalities in Ontario, a comprehensive set of service levels to support more intensive asset management activities has not yet been prepared
21 Township of South Frontenac Existing Levels of Service The primary resource to help define service levels was Ontario regulations. Majority of the levels of service documented are informal and are based on discussions with Township staff. These can be revisited and expanded upon as part of the AMP refinement process in the future Township Official Plan The Official Plan provides some direction on the levels of services of the asset groups in the Township at a strategic level, based on the economic, social and environmental considerations for growth in the Township. Section 4.0 of the Official Plan lays out general goals and objectives related to servicing and transportation. This translates to a general level of service requiring adequate, efficient and cost effective services and transportation throughout the Township. The Official Plan does not document specific service targets or criteria Documented Service Levels The Township adheres to Ontario Regulation 239/02 which sets minimum standards of repair for roads and bridges under municipal jurisdiction. Through Cartegraph, South Frontenac tracks and assesses their transportation assets and has a preventative strategy in place with an overall road overall condition index target of 65. This encompasses the Township s desired level of service for road assets through a decision making process which considers road class, surface type, and roadside environment. At this time, the Township does not have documented levels of service for storm sewers, water mains or water treatment facilities. Table 8 provides a set of typical service levels and performance metrics that the Township can consider in future updates of its AMP.
22 Township of South Frontenac 3-16 Table 8 Typical Service Levels and Performance Metrics for Small Municipalities Department Typical Levels of Service Suggested Performance Metric Water Mains & Water Facilities Storm Sewers Roads & Bridges 1. Provide services to Settlement Areas to accommodate growth on a cost recovery basis 2. Water system designed for maximum day + fire flow or maximum hour; Normal operating pressure between 350 to 480 kpa, 280 kpa to 700 kpa is allowable 3. Services at least 19 mm; Water mains at least 150 mm in diameter 4. Meet all regulated drinking water quality targets 1. Provide services to Settlement Areas to accommodate growth on a cost recovery basis 2. Level of protection established based on nature of area drained (risk/loss/damage of life/property): Major system - overland flooding less than 150 mm during 100 year event; Minor system 5 year storm, 10 year storm in select high value commercial area; Culverts, major sewers designed for the 25 to 50 year depending on road classification; 50 year storm for overland flow, some flooding permitted to below depth of 100 mm. 3. Discourage the use of small isolated wet ponds with no environmental or aesthetic or recreational benefit 1. Provide services to Settlement Areas to accommodate growth on a cost recovery basis 2. Level of Service D on all roads in peak hour 3. Urban Arterial roads have bike lanes and transit 4. Sidewalks on two sides of urban arterial and residential collector, one side on all other urban roads. 5. All new roads are paved 6. Concrete curb & gutter (and storm sewer) on all urban roads 7. Volume to capacity ratios should not exceed 0.85 to 1 at intersections 8. Provide maintenance standards in accordance with O/Reg 239/02 1. Number of development applications that are delayed due to a lack of adequate water infrastructure 2. Locations with inadequate pressure or flows confirmed through hydraulic modeling or field testing 3. Locations with inadequate infrastructure (small mains or services) 4. Number of times the regulated drinking water quality targets are not achieved 5. Number of customer complaints 1. Number of development applications that are delayed due to a lack of adequate storm water infrastructure 2. Number of locations where infrastructure does not meet protection target 3. Number of resident complaints 1. Number of development applications that are delayed 2. Number of roads less than level of service D during peak hour 3. Number of urban arterial roads with bike lanes and transit services 4. Number of roads that meet sidewalk level of service 5. Number of roads that are currently gravel that should be paved 6. Number of roads that do not meet curb/gutter/storm sewer level of service 7. Number of intersections that do not meet capacity level of service 8. Number of times road maintenance is not in accordance with O/Reg 239/02 9. Number of user complaints
23 Township of South Frontenac ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 4.1 Asset Management Strategy Overview The asset management strategy component of the AMP represents the set of planned activities to ensure that the state of the infrastructure achieves the level of service goals. The strategy is generally related to optimizing decisions with respect to: The replacement or rehabilitation of assets; The optimal level of maintenance investment required to minimize the long term costs of the assets (i.e. does more maintenance result in a longer useful life?); Disposing of assets that are not required to meet service levels; and Addressing Township policies that impact the infrastructure intervention that is used (i.e. does the asset size/design need to change to meet a certain policy). 4.2 Managing Risk This AMP establishes the management of risk as the primary method for developing an asset management strategy. This strategy is to prioritize the renewal of infrastructure that represents a high risk to the Township. This risk management strategy develops a renewal plan that is based on addressing the highest risk assets first according to the risk categories that were established in Section 2 of this report. The renewal of assets in the short term should be prioritized based on risk. Assets with a risk score of 25 should be replaced in the immediate future (2014). High risk assets should be replaced in the next 5 years (between 2015 and 2018), and medium-high risk assets should be replaced in the next ten years (between 2019 and 2023). To quantify the replacement value in each individual year, a random value in the corresponding replacement year period was generated for each asset. Medium, medium-low, and low risk assets should be replaced according to their remaining expected useful life over the long term (next 100 years). This strategy is summarized in Table 9.
24 Township of South Frontenac 4-18 Table 9 Renewal Strategy based on Risk Risk Category Risk Score Term Year Max Score 25 Immediate 2014 High Near Term (next 5 years) Medium-High Short Term (next 5-10 years) Medium Medium-Low Low Long Term - regular planned renewal based on condition, age of asset and expected useful life or when asset reaches a higher risk level (i.e. probability or consequence of failure increases) The strategy to prioritize the renewal of infrastructure that represents a high risk to the Township should be continued and expanded. The Township should continue to consider other factors when prioritizing asset replacement, such as health and safety, accessibility, complimentary asset replacement (road reconstruction, storm sewer and water main replacement at the same time), and capacity requirements (upgrading the size of a water main due to increased demand from new developments). The replacement strategy established through Cartegraph that South Frontenac currently uses for roads considers complimentary asset replacement to optimize use of resources and minimize disruption to the community. This is a recognized best practice. Figure 6 illustrates 10 year capital investment needs for the Township s infrastructure using the risk-based asset management strategy. Over the next ten years, the Township should spend an average of $9.5 million per year to address the infrastructure needs (in constant 2013 dollars).
25 Township of South Frontenac 4-19 $20,000,000 Short Term Capital Investment Medium-High Risk Assets $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 High Risk Assets $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 Average Yearly Investment $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $ Investment Year Roads Bridges & Culverts Storm Sewers WTP Watermains Figure 6 10 Year Capital Investment Needs
26 Township of South Frontenac Long Term Infrastructure Capital Investment Needs Long-term investment over the next 100 years must be considered to plan for replacement of assets with longer life cycles. Buried infrastructure such as storm sewers and water mains are expected to have a useful life of years, and may last even longer. Similarly, newly constructed water facilities have expected useful lives of 100 years. In order to capture replacement of all assets the full life cycle period must be considered. Long-term investment associated with replacement needs for first, second, and third replacements over the next 100 years were based on condition, age and remaining useful life. First replacement term for medium, medium-low, and low risk road and storm sewer assets was determined on risk score. The second and third replacements are estimated based on expected useful life. This strategy is summarized in Table 10. Table 10 Renewal Strategy for Medium to Low Road and Storm Sewer Assets Risk Category Risk Score Year Roads Storm sewers Medium Medium-Low Low Minimum Score Remaining useful life and condition were used for bridges and culverts. For example, culverts are assumed to have a useful life of 50 years. A culvert that was constructed in 1995 has 64% of its useful life remaining, or 32 years (more than half its useful life). The first replacement of this bridge should be scheduled for The second replacement would occur in The third replacement would occur in 2145, beyond the study scope. Similarly, if the bridge has a low to medium risk score, but more than half the useful life has passed, the replacement schedule is determined based on current condition. Figure 7 provides the long term capital investment needs for the renewal of the Township s existing infrastructure based on a strategic review of the replacement cost and theoretical useful life of each asset.
27 Township of South Frontenac 4-21 $120,000,000 Long Term Capital Investment $100,000, Year Investment Average $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $ Roads Bridges & Culverts Storm Sewers WTP Watermains Figure Year Capital Investment Needs
28 Township of South Frontenac 4-22 Based on this review, the existing in-scope infrastructure needs are approximately $9.5 million per year (in constant 2013 dollars), to be sustained using this strategic approach. This represents an overall lifecycle cost of approximately 3% on top of routine O&M costs, which usually are in the range of 3-5% for municipal infrastructure. Over the coming years, the Township will continually review the infrastructure needs as more information becomes available and as technological improvements reduce the cost of renewing infrastructure. 4.4 Asset Management Strategies to Reduce Infrastructure Costs The Township intends to continue advancing its asset management practices over the next several years. The infrastructure needs presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7 are based on the assumption that the Township will replace existing infrastructure with an identical asset and therefore uses replacement costs indicated. However, it may be feasible to replace infrastructure at a lower cost by using alternative procurement methods, new technologies, or rehabilitating the existing assets. The following is a list of strategies that the Township will continue to consider and improve upon to reduce the costs of addressing the immediate infrastructure needs: Review the potential cost savings of multi-year contracts to renew infrastructure (i.e. road resurfacing, water main replacement, etc.); Review the potential of undertaking partnerships with neighboring municipalities to achieve greater economies of scale with respect to infrastructure replacement contracts; Review operational practices to seek optimization of current assets.
29 Township of South Frontenac FINANCING STRATEGY The financing strategy is the final component of the AMP and provides the plan to move forward. For the purposes of this report, it was assumed that all expenditures are in 2013 dollars, levies will be maintained in future years, and assets are replaced at the end of their useful life. This strategy does not account for inflation; typical increases and adjustments to address inflation are still required. 5.1 Sources of Funding The Township of South Frontenac provides funding for assets through two sources of revenue: Water User Fees and Municipal Tax Levy. The financing strategy supports this method of operating by addressing these two areas separately. Note that this financing strategy assumes zero change to the existing funding received through senior government programs, including the Federal Gas Tax. In 2012, South Frontenac approved a 1% tax levy increase, compounded yearly, which goes into the Asset Investment Reserve. This strategy is a proactive way to deal with infrastructure deficit, and is a best practice recommended by all regulatory agencies. This will help to offset capital expenditures for tax supported assets. 5.2 Short Term Financing Strategy Water Assets The water treatment plant, water storage facility and water mains were constructed in the past 10 years; as such, these assets are not expected to require major capital replacement in the short term. Utilities Kingston operates these facilities and has developed a short term capital investment forecast for the next 10 years. This forecast has been included in short term expenditures. The Township is currently in a position of deficit from accumulated depreciation of the water treatment plant and water mains constructed in The Township has proposed rate increases over next 5 years to reduce the deficit. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for water infrastructure over the next 10 years are displayed in Table 11.
30 Township of South Frontenac 5-24 Table 11 Short Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Year Opening Balance Expenditures Capital Levy Ending Balance ,822 3,500 35, , ,566 7,700 90, , ,896 26, , , ,005 31, , , ,506 11, , , , , , , ,254 10, ,423 1,052, ,052,677 29, ,423 1,188, ,188, , ,423 1,078, ,078,193 23, ,423 1,220,116 TOTAL 522,670 This table illustrates that over the course of the next 10 years, the current proposed Water Capital Levy is sufficient to finance the expenditures. The surplus at the end of 2023 will be used to finance future year s expenditures Tax Supported Assets Tax supported infrastructure includes roads, bridges, culverts and storm sewers. It should be noted that other assets not included in the scope of this study are also supported through tax levies. In 2012, the Township approved a 1% increase to the Asset Investment Reserve. For the purposes of this plan, 80% of the reserve is allocated towards roads, bridges & culverts and storm sewers. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for tax supported infrastructure over the next 10 years are displayed in Table 12. Year Table 12 Short Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) Opening Balance Expenditures Capital Levy 1% Asset Investment Reserve Ending Balance ,765 10,775,000 4,283, ,308-5,233, ,233,928 3,559,500 4,283, ,624-3,993, ,993,805 3,012,250 4,283, ,940-2,097, ,097,116 2,106,675 4,283, , , ,464 6,752,300 4,283, , , ,265 18,408,475 4,283, ,888-13,981, ,981,853 14,362,525 4,283,999 1,062,204-22,998, ,998,175 9,963,350 4,283,999 1,171,520-27,506, ,506,006 14,565,100 4,283,999 1,280,836-36,506, ,506,271 11,768,100 4,283,999 1,390,152-42,600,220 TOTAL 95,273,275
31 Township of South Frontenac 5-25 Over the course of the next 10 years the current Tax Supported Capital Levy is insufficient to finance the expenditures. At the end of 2023 there is a deficit of $42.6 million. In the absence of additional government funding or cost savings, an annual Tax Levy increase of 5% for each of the next 10 years, on top of the approved 1% increase, would be needed to reduce this deficit to zero by the end of the decade. Tax Levy increases of this magnitude are not received favourably by taxpayers. By taking a longer term view, this Tax Levy increase can be reduced. This will be discussed in the Long-Term Financing Strategy Addressing the Short-Term Financial Requirements The following list of alternatives should be considered to reduce the financing requirements over the next ten years: 1. The Township should develop an Implementation Strategy to improve this Plan over the next few years. This would include optimizing the current service levels and continuing to update condition, risk, and health and safety information. 2. Continue to raise reserve funds through tax rate increases to offset accumulating depreciation costs. 3. Some municipalities rely on debt to decrease to reduce tax rate increases. This may be viewed as a feasible option, but it must be recognized that debt offers short term relief but long term pain. Money borrowed today must be paid back in the future with interest. 4. Continue to pursue Provincial and Federal grants whenever possible. The Plan assumes no grant funding from the Provincial and Federal Governments. This is a conservative approach that is recommended in the Provincial government s asset management guide. Both senior levels of government have acknowledged that they should share in addressing the infrastructure deficit. It is reasonable to assume that funds will become available in the future from both senior levels of government. Over the past few years, South Frontenac has undertaken a proactive approach to addressing their financial position, and should continue to do so. Setting aside reserves to address future expenditures puts the Township is a good position financially. South Frontenac is in a better position financially than many municipalities of similar size in Ontario. It was noted that in the past, the Township was spending approximately 2% on Operations & Maintenance for roads and an additional 2% on Capital, which is in the appropriate range to maintain infrastructure and
32 Township of South Frontenac 5-26 rehabilitate aging assets. The Township should continue to employ proactive financing strategies to minimize deficit and keep this infrastructure in good condition well into the future. 5.3 Long Term Financing Strategy Water Assets The Capital Expenditures over the 100 years indicate that the asset replacements for water assets are grouped in large amounts. Water assets were all constructed around the same time, and as such, are expected to need replacement in the same year, according to expected useful life. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures on water infrastructure over the next 100 years are displayed in Table 13. Investment Period Table 13 Long Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Opening Balance Expenditures Capital Levy Ending Balance , ,670 1,420,964 1,220, ,220, ,000 1,654,230 2,483, ,483,346 1,103,524 1,654,230 2,989, ,989, ,654,230 4,643, ,643,282 4,867,321 1,654,230 1,430, ,430, ,654,230 3,084, ,084, ,654,230 4,738, ,738,651 4,420,726 1,654,230 1,972, ,972, ,654,230 3,626, ,626,385 6,416,581 1,654,230-1,135,966 TOTAL 17,766,822 Over the course of the next 100 years the current Water Capital Levy is insufficient to finance the expenditures. By the end of the 100 years, additional financing of $1 million will need to be applied to the Water User Fees Supported capital program. An annual Total Water User Fees increase of approximately 0.12% to total water user fees will raise sufficient funds to finance the $1 million. This is demonstrated in Table 14.
33 Township of South Frontenac 5-27 Investment Period Table 14 Adjusted Long Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Opening Balance Expenditures Capital Levy Ending Balance , ,670 1,432,904 1,232, ,232, ,000 1,688,058 2,484, ,484,114 1,103,524 1,710,205 3,090, ,090, ,732,617 4,823, ,823,412 4,867,321 1,755,299 1,711, ,711, ,778,253 3,489, ,489, ,801,483 5,291, ,291,126 4,420,726 1,824,997 2,695, ,695, ,848,789 4,544, ,544,186 6,416,581 1,872, TOTAL 17,766, Tax Supported Assets The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for tax supported infrastructure over the next 100 years, separated into decades, are displayed in Table 15. Investment Period Table 15 Long Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) Opening Balance Expenditures Capital Levy 1% Asset Investment Reserve Ending Balance ,765 95,273,275 42,839,990 8,982,300-42,600, ,600,220 83,920,600 42,839,990 19,913,900-63,766, ,766,930 98,907,150 42,839,990 30,845,500-88,988, ,988,590 87,800,900 42,839,990 41,777,100-92,172, ,172,400 88,398,850 42,839,990 52,708,700-85,022, ,022, ,826,815 42,839,990 63,640,300-80,369, ,369,085 92,668,898 42,839,990 74,571,900-55,626, ,626,093 92,903,812 42,839,990 85,503,500-20,186, ,186, ,777,825 42,839,990 96,435,100 15,310, ,310,850 87,995,300 42,839, ,366,700 77,522,240 TOTAL 933,473,425 The Township has approved a 1% tax levy increase, compounded yearly. This is a good step in addressing the necessary financing. Over the course of the next 100 years the current Tax Supported Capital Levy, coupled with the 1% Asset Investment Reserve is sufficient to finance
34 Township of South Frontenac 5-28 the expenditures. The surplus at the end of the last two decades will be needed to offset the effects of inflation. It is important to note the financing shortfall in most decades. If additional financing becomes available then it should be applied to the early years of this financing scenario Addressing the Long-Term Financial Requirements The best strategy to address the long-term financing is to continue to develop improved asset management tools and processes. These strategies include the following: Continue to establish appropriate levels of service and associated performance metrics to track how well the infrastructure is meeting the service levels. This may result in some higher-risk assets being renewed at a later time and/or some lower-risk assets becoming a priority for renewal at an earlier time than expected. For example, a road asset that is identified as low risk may need to be replaced because it poses a health and safety risk. Maintain an up-to-date database of asset condition based on regular inspections. Collect and review additional condition/performance information for the Township s infrastructure to better assess the probability of failure. For example, tracking and reviewing water main break records is a much better indicator for the future probability of failure of the asset. This analysis can then be used to adjust the infrastructure needs. Consider non-infrastructure solutions to achieve service levels. For example, promoting a cycling-friendly community could be accomplished by improved signage, reducing speed limits or undertaking educational campaigns, without additional infrastructure. Consider consolidating or eliminating redundant infrastructure. For example, removing bridges that are under-utilized or have alternate bridges that can be used will reduce the long term infrastructure needs while maintaining service levels. The Township of South Frontenac has already taken a good first step by investing in the Cartegraph asset management system to prioritize asset repair, rehabilitation and replacement. An extensive database has been developed to manage road assets and the Township is dedicated to updating and maintaining this as new or more up-to-date information becomes available. The Township should continue to assess and prioritize asset replacement needs by incorporating appropriate levels of service, risk tolerance, and updated condition assessment as new technologies and methods for assessing assets become available.
35 Township of South Frontenac CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS South Frontenac s first identifies a long-term need of $9.5 million/year to renew the Township s infrastructure for assets in the scope of this study. Asset renewal in the short term should be prioritized to minimize risk and address health and safety concerns. South Frontenac has taken a proactive approach in addressing infrastructure needs by setting aside reserve funds to minimize deficits, approving levy increases to cover future deficits and investing in Cartegraph to better understand transportation asset condition, risk and replacement needs. South Frontenac is committed to maintaining an up-to-date asset management database including levels of service, risk tolerance, and condition to improve the process for assessing and prioritizing asset repair, rehabilitation and replacement. The Township is in a better position financially than many municipalities in Ontario and should continue to engage in forward thinking financial planning. South Frontenac provides funding for assets through two sources of revenue: Water User Fees and Municipal Tax Levy. In the short term (10 years), Water User Fees, based on proposed rate changes, are sufficient to finance the expected expenditures. Over the course of 100 years, an annual Water User Fee increase of approximately 0.12%, in addition to inflation adjustments, will raise sufficient funds to finance forecasted expenditures. The current Tax Supported Capital Levy is insufficient to finance forecasted expenditures in the short term. An annual Tax Levy increase of 5% over the next 10 years would be needed to avoid a deficit at the end of the decade. By taking a longer term view this Tax Levy increase can be reduced. The Township has recently approved an increase of 1%, compounded yearly. Over the next 100 years, the Tax Supported Capital Levy coupled with the 1% Asset Investment Reserve and inflation adjustments is sufficient to finance AMP expenditures. Over the coming years, the Township will continually review the infrastructure needs as more information is gathered. The Township will continue to set aside funds for asset replacement, build appropriate depreciation costs into future water rate adjustments, and continue to pursue Provincial and Federal infrastructure grants. This strategy positions the Township on a path to ultimately reach a point where the infrastructure needs equal the available revenues.
36 Township of South Frontenac A-1 APPENDIX A Township of South Frontenac Map
37 Township of South Frontenac A-1 DRAFT
38 Township of South Frontenac B-1 APPENDIX B Information and Assumptions used to Develop Long Term and Prioritized Short Term Renewal Needs DRAFT
39 Township of South Frontenac B-2 Asset Group Probability of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high) Consequence of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high) Useful Life Unit Costs (preliminary estimates for planning purposes only) Roads Based on 2013 Inspections Overall Condition Index (OCI): OCI 0 40 = 5 OCI = 4 OCI = 3 OCI = 2 OCI = 1 Based on Road Class: Arterial = 5 Collector = 4 Local = 3 School Zone or Firehall = 5 30 yrs Based on Surface Type: Village = $1200 / m Asphalt = $350 / m Surface treated = $300 / m Gravel = $250 / m Estimates based on TWP unit costs and AANDC 2012 Cost Study (Gravel) Bridges & Culverts Based on OSIM reports Bridge Condition Index (BCI): BCI 0 35 = 5 BCI = 4 BCI = 3 BCI = 2 BCI = 1 Bridge (Arterial)= 5 Bridge (Collector/Local)= 4 Culvert (Arterial)=4 Culvert (Collector/Local) = 3 Bridges = 75 yrs Culverts= 50 yrs Based on average historical replacement cost (in 2013 dollars): $5,000 / m 2 Approximate cost, based on average bridge and culvert replacement values in Township If BCI unavailable, based on % of useful life remaining (age) Water Facilities Based on remaining useful life (age): % = % = % = % = 4 0 % = 5 Raw Water Intake = 5 Elevated Water Storage Tower = 4 Treatment Plant = 5 UV& GAC contactors = 5 Raw Water Intake = 100 yrs Elevated Water Storage Tower = 100 yrs Treatment Plant = 50 yrs UV& GAC contactors = 25 yrs Based on historical costs + inflation rate of 3% DRAFT
40 Township of South Frontenac B-3 Based on remaining useful life (age): Based on pipe diameter: 100 yrs Based on Diameter: Water Mains % = % = % = % = % = mm = mm = mm = mm = 2 < 100 mm = mm = $450 / m 200 mm = $400 / m 150 mm = $300 / m 100 mm = $400 / m (based on City of Ottawa 2012 Spec Code Listing, includes all appurtenances) Water course crossings cost & fire hydrants based on historical costs + 3% inflation Storm Sewers Based on Structural Grade (SG) SG 1 = 1 SG 2 = 2 SG 3 = 3 SG 4 = 4 SG 5 = 5 Based on sewer diameter: 1050mm+ = 5 675mm - 900mm = 4 450mm - 600mm = 3 250mm - 375mm = 2 < 250 mm = 1 80 yrs Unit Cost Estimated based on Diameter: 2 X diameter (mm) eg: dia 300 mm = $600 / m DRAFT
41 Township of South Frontenac C-1 APPENDIX C Detailed State of the Infrastructure Analysis DRAFT
42 Roads ID Street From To Classification Roadside Environment Surface Type Maintenace Class Length (m) Width (m) Shoulder Width (m) Pavement Area (m2) Inspection OCI (2013) Special Designation Health & Safety Risk Cost $/m assumed Value Estimate Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Abernathy Road Ida Hill Road Ida Hill Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Abernathy Road Ida Hill Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 175, /1/ to , Alton Road Road 38 Loughborough Portland Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 810, Road 1/1/ to , Alton Road Loughborough Portland Bedford Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,110, Road 1/1/ to , Amelia Street Brewery Street William Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 240, /1/ to , Amey Road Murvale Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 285, /1/ to , Anderson Road Bradshaw Road Local Urban Gravel Class $ 637, /1/ to , Anderson Road Bertrim Lane Local Rural Gravel Class $ 525, /1/ to , Anderson Road Bertrim Lane Local Rural Gravel Class $ 350, /1/ to , Arena Boundary Road Second Lake Road Snider Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Arena Boundary Road Snider Road Davey Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 645, /1/ to , Arena Boundary Road Davey Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 645, /1/ to , Arena Boundary Road Piccadilly Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 157, /1/ to , Arthur Road Latimer Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 150, /1/ to , Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 975, /1/ to , Ashwood Drive Rutledge Road Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Asselstine Road Ritchie Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 50, /1/ to , Autumn Ridge Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Cedarwoods Drive Road 38 Valleyview Drive Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 108, /1/ to , Babcock Road Rutledge Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 60, /1/ to , Badour Road Crow Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Bank Street Road 38 Revell Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 480, /1/ to , Bank Street Revell Road Revell Road Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Battersea Cross Street Wellington Street Battersea Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , Battersea Mill Street Battersea Road Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 45, /1/ to , Battersea Water Street Battersea Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , Bauder Drive Desert Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Bear Creek Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 810, /1/ to , Bedford Mills Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 175, /1/ to , Beech Nut Road Mount Chesney Road Bear Creek Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 375, /1/ to , Bell Road Holleford Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 100, /1/ to , Bellrock Mill Street Bellrock Road First Lake Road Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 75, /1/ to , Bellrock Mill Street First Lake Road Local Urban Gravel Class $ 25, to Bellrock Pepper Street Bellrock Road First Lake Road Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 30, /1/ to , Bellrock Pero Road Leveque Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 75, /1/ to , Billy Green Road Maple Leaf Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,500, /1/ to , Bob's Lake Road Green Bay Road Bradshaw Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,050, /1/ to , Botting Road Bedford Road Sills Bay Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 225, /1/ to , Boyce Road Watson Road Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 534, /1/ to , Boyce Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 816, /1/ to , Bracken Road Yarker Road 4 Mclean Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 465, /1/ to , Bradden Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Bradford Road Camden Portland Camden Portland Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, Boundary Road Boundary Road 11/1/ to , Bradford Road Camden Portland Wolfe Swamp Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 750, Boundary Road 1/1/ to , Bradford Road Wolfe Swamp Road Ellerbeck Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 195, /1/ to , Bradshaw Road Road 38 Bob's Lake Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 315, /1/ to , Bradshaw Road Bob's Lake Road Steele Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 437, /1/ to , Bradshaw Road Steele Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 475, /1/ to , Bresee Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 100, /1/ to , Brewer Lake Road Sunbury Road Sunbury Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, /1/ to , Brewery Street William Street Sydenham Mill Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 240, /1/ to , Buck Bay Road Westport Road Westport Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 70, /1/ to , Buck Bay Road Westport Road White Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Buck Bay Road White Lake Road White Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,625, /1/ to , Buck Bay Road White Lake Road Bob's Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,140, /1/ to , Bunker Hill Road Westport Road James Wilson Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 650, /1/ to , Burnett Road Road 38 Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Burns Road Green Bay Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 825, /1/ to , Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 70, /1/ to , Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Burridge Lake Road Burridge Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 450, to , Burridge Road Green Bay Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 2,050, /1/ to , Burridge Road Westport Road Green Bay Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 595, /1/ to , Camden Portland Yarker Road 4 Colebrook Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 855, Boundary Road 1/1/ to , Camden Portland Colebrook Road Petworth Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 630, Boundary Road 1/1/ to , Campbell Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 600, /1/ to , Milburn Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 255, /1/ to , Milburn Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 435, /1/ to , Campbell Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 600, /1/ to , Canal Road Sunbury Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Desert Lake Road Desert Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 255, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Desert Lake Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 175, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 450, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Holsgrove Lane Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 600, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Holsgrove Lane James Wilson Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 690, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road James Wilson Road Devil Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 525, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Devil Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 850, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 122, /1/ to , Canoe Lake Road Westport Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 900, /1/ to ,000 Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Install / Last Reconstruct Date Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on Risk) Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Timing of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year
43 ID Street From To Classification Roadside Environment Surface Type Maintenace Class Length (m) Width (m) Shoulder Width (m) Pavement Area (m2) Inspection OCI (2013) Special Designation Health & Safety Risk Cost $/m assumed Value Estimate Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Carlton Drive Road 38 Cemetery Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 540, /1/ to , Carrying Place Road Burnt Hills Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,200, /1/ to , Carrying Place Road Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 315, /1/ to , Cedarwoods Drive Valleyview Drive Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 93, /1/ to , Cemetery Road Water Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 60, /1/ to , Centennial Park Road Notre Dame Street Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 180, /1/ to , Centreville Road Devil Lake Road Devil Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Centreville Road Devil Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Charlie Green Road Norway Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Church Road (Bellrock) Bellrock Road Mary Moore Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 450, /1/ to , Church Street Notre Dame Street Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, (Harrowsmith) 11/1/ to , Church Street Road 38 Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 240, (Harrowsmith) 11/1/ to , Clair Road Leveque Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 900, /1/ to , Clark Road McConnell Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 270, /1/ to , Clear Lake Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 175, /1/ to , Clearwater Road Bedford Road Botting Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Cliffside Lane Railton Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Colebrook Road Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Colebrook Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Colebrook Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 330, /1/ to , Colebrook Road Road 38 Cemetery Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 450, /1/ to , Colebrook Road Cemetery Road Road 38 Collector Urban Asphalt Class School Zone 1200 $ 1,500, /1/ to , Colebrook Road East Road 38 Kingston Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , Collins Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 45, /1/ to , Concession 12 Mulville Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 275, /1/ to , Copper Kettle Drive Lakefield Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Corkey Road Latimer Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 112, /1/ to , Cottage Road Gould Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 100, /1/ to , Country Woods Drive Campbell Road Campbell Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , Coupland Road Rutledge Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 37, /1/ to , Craig Road Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,125, /1/ to , Cross Road Bellrock Road Verona Sand Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 165, /1/ to , Crow Lake Road Badour Road Badour Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 165, /1/ to , Cummins Road Wilton Road 18 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 350, /1/ to , Daley Road Railton Road Railton Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Daley Road Railton Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Darling Road Opinicon Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Davey Drive Maple Drive Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 157, /1/ to , Davidson Road Latimer Road Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Davidson Road Holmes Road Mowoods Lane Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 450, /1/ to , Davidson Road Mowoods Lane Latimer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 390, /1/ to , Davidson Road Latimer Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 780, /1/ to , Davidson Road Perth Road 10 Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Dean Smith Road Leland Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 500, /1/ to , Deer Creek Drive Spooner Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Deer Run Way Bedford Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 157, /1/ to , Deerhurst Lane Bellrock Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, /1/ to , Depot Street Bellrock Road Local Urban Gravel Class $ 25, /1/ to Devil Lake Road Canoe Lake Road Kingsford Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 400, /1/ to , Devil Lake Road Kingsford Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,050, /1/ to , Devil Lake Road Tobin Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,125, /1/ to , Devil Lake Road Tobin Road Centreville Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 487, /1/ to , Devil Lake Road Centreville Road Westport Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 495, /1/ to , Dewitt Road Burridge Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 650, /1/ to , Deyos Road Morey Lane James Wilson Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 625, /1/ to , Deyos Road Desert Lake Road Morey Lane Local Rural Gravel Class $ 275, /1/ to , Division Street Perth Road 10 Latimer Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 360, /1/ to , Dixon Road Latimer Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 287, /1/ to , Draper Lake Road Norway Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 725, /1/ to , Duff Road Round Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 675, /1/ to , Easy Street Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , Eel Bay Road Charlie Green Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, /1/ to , Ellerbeck Road Bradford Road Petworth Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 450, /1/ to , Ernie Road Lower Round Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Factory Road Washburn Road Sunbury Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 350, /1/ to , Fairgrounds Road Perth Road 10 Latimer Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 360, /1/ to , Fawn Brook Drive Spooner Road Whitetail Court Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Fellows Road Murvale Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Firehall Road Garrett Road Burridge Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 375, /1/ to , First Lake Road Main Street First Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , First Lake Road First Lake Road First Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , First Lake Road First Lake Road Snider Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 925, /1/ to , Fish Creek Road Bob's Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 625, /1/ to , Fishing Lake Road North Shore Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 2,000, /1/ to , Fitzgerald Road Westport Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, to , Florida Road Henderson Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Florida Road Henderson Road Henderson Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 390, /1/ to , Forest Hill Point Valleyview Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Forest Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 570, /1/ to , Four Seasons Drive Holmes Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 1,620, /1/ to , Fox Ridge Trail Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 720, /1/ to , Freeman Road Loughborough Portland Gould Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 137, Road 1/1/ to , Freeman Road Gould Lake Road Gould Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 345, /1/ to , Freeman Road Gould Lake Road Bedford Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 585, /1/ to , Freeman Road Bedford Road Sills Bay Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Frontenac Road Mount Chesney Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Frye Road Roushorn Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 250, /1/ to ,333 Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Install / Last Reconstruct Date Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on Risk) Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Timing of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year
44 ID Street From To Classification Roadside Environment Surface Type Maintenace Class Length (m) Width (m) Shoulder Width (m) Pavement Area (m2) Inspection OCI (2013) Special Designation Health & Safety Risk Cost $/m assumed Value Estimate Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Garrett Road Westport Road Green Bay Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 550, /1/ to , Garrison Court Petworth Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 135, /1/ to , Genge Street Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , George Street Sydenham Mill Street Wheatley Street Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 180, /1/ to , George Street Wheatley Street Portland Avenue Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 240, /1/ to , German Road Long Swamp Road Long Swamp Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 60, /1/ to , German Road Petworth Road Petworth Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 495, /1/ to , German Road Petworth Road Long Swamp Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 375, /1/ to , Goodrich Street Percy Street Main Street Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 30, /1/ to , Gorr Road Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 270, /1/ to , Gould Lake Road Freeman Road Gould Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 270, /1/ to , Gould Lake Road Gould Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 362, /1/ to , Graham Road Road 38 Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Graham Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 60, /1/ to , Green Bay Road Buck Bay Road New Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,550, /1/ to , Green Bay Road New Road Burns Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,125, /1/ to , Green Bay Road Burns Road Burridge Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 870, /1/ to , Greenfield Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 37, /1/ to , Greenfield Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 175, /1/ to , Greenfield Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 231, /1/ to , Greenfield Road Perth Road 10 Duff Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Grey Owl Road Oak Bluffs Road Oak Bluffs Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 122, /1/ to , Hanna Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 350, /1/ to , Harris Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 475, /1/ to , Haughton Road Westport Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Henderson Road Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , Henry Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 250, /1/ to , Heska Crescent Holmes Road Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 375, /1/ to , Hewlett Packard Road North Shore Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, /1/ to , Hickey Road Buck Bay Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 300, /1/ to , Hidden Valley Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 210, /1/ to , Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 Moore Farm Lane Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, /1/ to , Hinchinbrooke Road Moore Farm Lane Desert Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,320, /1/ to , Hinchinbrooke Road Desert Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 800, /1/ to , Hitchcock Drive Sunbury Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 255, /1/ to , Hogan Road Wilmer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 570, /1/ to , Holleford Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 180, /1/ to , Holleford Road Road 38 Vanluven Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , Holleford Road Vanluven Road Trousdale Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 405, /1/ to , Holleford Road Trousdale Road New Morin Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 540, /1/ to , Holleford Road New Morin Road Johnny Martin Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 870, /1/ to , Holleford Road Johnny Martin Road Deer Park Lane Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , Holleford Road Deer Park Lane Desert Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 810, /1/ to , Holmes Road Heska Crescent Heska Crescent Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 405, /1/ to , Holmes Road Heska Crescent Silverwood Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Holmes Road Silverwood Drive Davidson Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 270, /1/ to , Holmes Road Davidson Road Latimer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, /1/ to , Holmes Road Latimer Road Old Boy Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Holmes Road Old Boy Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Holmes Road Perth Road 10 Lakefield Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, /1/ to , Holmes Road Lakefield Drive Davidson Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 450, /1/ to , Holmes Road Davidson Road Moreland Dixon Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Horning Road Sydenham Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 465, /1/ to , Iawah Road Lee Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 375, /1/ to , Ida Hill Road Washburn Road Sunbury Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 325, /1/ to , Ida Hill Road Sunbury Road Milburn Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 570, /1/ to , James Wilson Road Bunker Hill Road Canoe Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,475, /1/ to , James Wilson Road Canoe Lake Road Canoe Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 250, /1/ to , Jamieson Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 390, /1/ to , Jamieson Road Road 38 Loughborough Portland Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 690, Road 9/1/ to , Johnny Martin Road Holleford Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 225, /1/ to , Johns Way Road Heska Crescent Heska Crescent Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Keeley Road Sydenham Road Sydenham Road Collector Rural Asphalt Class $ 105, /1/ to , Keeley Road Sydenham Road Sydenham Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 750, /1/ to , Keeley Road Sydenham Road Rutledge Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 540, /1/ to , Keir Road Duff Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 175, /1/ to , Keller Road Larry York Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 37, /1/ to , Kerr Road Petworth Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Kildeer Drive Pine Ridge Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 70, /1/ to , Kingsford Lake Road Devil Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 75, /1/ to , Kingsmere Lane Railton Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , Kingston Road Road 38 Harrowsmith Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 360, /1/ to , Knowlton Lake Road Loughborough Portland Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, Road 1/1/ to , Koen Road North Shore Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Lagoon Road Harrowsmith Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 50, /1/ to , Lake Road Lower Round Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 37, /1/ to , Lake Road Lower Round Lake Road Lower Round Lake Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Lakefield Drive Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Lakefield Drive Holmes Road Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , Lakefield Drive Holmes Road Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 390, /1/ to , Lakeside Road Duff Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Lakeview Drive Salmon Drive Pine Ridge Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 52, /1/ to , Lambert Road Stage Coach Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, /1/ to , Landfill Road Draper Lake Road Norway Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 45, /1/ to ,500 Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Install / Last Reconstruct Date Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on Risk) Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Timing of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year
45 ID Street From To Classification Roadside Environment Surface Type Maintenace Class Length (m) Width (m) Shoulder Width (m) Pavement Area (m2) Inspection OCI (2013) Special Designation Health & Safety Risk Cost $/m assumed Value Estimate Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Larry York Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 100, /1/ to , Latimer Road Dover Road Davidson Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 285, /1/ to , Latimer Road Davidson Road Holmes Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 690, /1/ to , Latimer Road Holmes Road Davidson Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, /1/ to , Latimer Road Davidson Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 870, /1/ to , Latimer Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 595, /1/ to , Latimer Road Perth Road 10 Round Lake Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 540, /1/ to , Lee Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,350, /1/ to , Leisure Point Road Massassauga Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 600, /1/ to , Leland Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Leland Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , Leland Road Perth Road 10 North Shore Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,050, /1/ to , Leveque Road Bellrock Mill Street Bellrock Mill Street Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 30, /1/ to , Leveque Road Bellrock Mill Street Bellrock Pero Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Leveque Road Bellrock Pero Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 887, /1/ to , Little Long Lake Road Bedford Road Charlie Green Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 450, /1/ to , Long Swamp Road Bellrock Road Bellrock Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 525, /1/ to , Long Swamp Road German Road Bellrock Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 630, /1/ to , Loughborough Drive Road Sydenham Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Loughborough View Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 175, /1/ to , Loughborough Portland Harrowsmith Road Alton Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, Road 1/1/ to , Loughborough Portland Alton Road Jamieson Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 405, Road 1/1/ to , Loughborough Portland Jamieson Road Vanluven Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, Road 1/1/ to , Lower Round Lake Road Round Lake Road Ernie Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 630, /1/ to , Lower Round Lake Road Ernie Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 435, /1/ to , MacGillivary Road Billy Green Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 375, /1/ to , Main Street Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 135, /1/ to , Mallen Road Craig Road Craig Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 30, /1/ to , Maple Crest Road Lakefield Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Maple Drive Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 660, /1/ to , Maple Hill Way Hitchcock Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Maple Leaf Road Opinicon Road Billy Green Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 450, /1/ to , Maria Street Notre Dame Street Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , Mary Moore Road Church Road (Bellrock) Church Road (Bellrock) Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 330, /1/ to , Mary Moore Road Church Road (Bellrock) Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Masonville Road Craig Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 75, /1/ to , Massassauga Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 350, /1/ to , Massassauga Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,425, /1/ to , McAndrews Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 1,050, /1/ to , McConnell Road Clark Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , McConnell Road Clark Road Yarker Road 4 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 435, /1/ to , McFadden Road Wilmer Road Norway Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 555, /1/ to , McGarvey Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 45, /1/ to , McGarvey Road Battersea Road Princess Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 450, /1/ to , Mclean Road Wallace Road Colebrook Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 405, /1/ to , McMahon Drive Lions Club Road Bank Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 300, /1/ to , McNiel Road Burridge Road Lee Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 775, /1/ to , Meadow Ridge Road Park Valley Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 39, /1/ to , Meeks Road Leveque Road Leveque Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 75, to , Mica Point Road Badour Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 135, /1/ to , Middle Woodlands Drive Autumn Ridge Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Milburn Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 600, /1/ to , Milburn Road Battersea Road Wellington Street Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 540, /1/ to , Miller Road Road 38 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 300, /1/ to , Morrison Road Wilmer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Mount Chesney Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Mount Chesney Road Battersea Road Frontenac Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Mount Chesney Road Frontenac Road Beach Nut Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , Mulville Road Devil Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 600, /1/ to , Murton Road Road 38 Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 555, /1/ to , Murton Road Road 38 Murvale Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 270, /1/ to , Murvale Road Murton Road Scanlan Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 465, /1/ to , Murvale Road Scanlan Road Amey Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, /1/ to , Mustard Road Craig Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 75, /1/ to , New Morin Road Vanluven Road Holleford Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , New Road Westport Road Green Bay Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Nolan Road Clair Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 87, /1/ to , North Shore Crescent Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 330, /1/ to , North Shore Road North Shore Crescent Hewlett Packard Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,740, /1/ to , North Shore Road Hewlett Packard Road Convery Lane Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,200, /1/ to , Norway Road Draper Lake Road Charlie Green Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 30, /1/ to , Norway Road Charlie Green Road McFadden Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 105, /1/ to , Norway Road McFadden Road Wilmer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 570, /1/ to , Notre Dame Street Colebrook Road Church Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 420, (Harrowsmith) 11/1/ to , Notre Dame Street Church Street Centennial Park Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 420, (Harrowsmith) 1/1/ to , Notre Dame Street Centennial Park Road Centennial Park Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 420, /1/ to , Oak Bluffs Road Alf Patterson Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,067, /1/ to , Old Boy Road Perth Road 10 Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to ,000 Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Install / Last Reconstruct Date Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on Risk) Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Timing of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year
46 ID Street From To Classification Roadside Environment Surface Type Maintenace Class Length (m) Width (m) Shoulder Width (m) Pavement Area (m2) Inspection OCI (2013) Special Designation Health & Safety Risk Cost $/m assumed Value Estimate Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Install / Last Reconstruct Date Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on Risk) Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Timing of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year Old Thirteen Island Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 400, /1/ to , Opinicon Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,320, /1/ to , Opinicon Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 990, /1/ to , Opinicon Road Post Office Gate Lane Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,185, /1/ to , Opinicon Road Post Office Gate Lane Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Opinicon Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 885, /1/ to , O'Riley Road Holleford Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 150, /1/ to , Ormsbee Road Milburn Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 795, /1/ to , Orser Road Stage Coach Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Orser Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Orser Road Stage Coach Road Sydenham Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 35, /1/ to , Ottawa Street Railway Street Wilton Road 18 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , Park Street Centennial Park Road Graham Road Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 60, /1/ to , Park Valley Road Keeley Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 135, /1/ to , Percy Street Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 75, /1/ to , Perth Road Crescent Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 720, /1/ to , Peters Road Harrowsmith Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Petworth Road Garrison Court River Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 375, /1/ to , Petworth Road River Road Kerr Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 975, /1/ to , Petworth Road Kerr Road Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,065, /1/ to , Piccadilly Road Road 38 Arena Boundary Road Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 52, /1/ to , Pine Ridge Road Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 540, /1/ to , Point Road Wheatley Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 300, /1/ to , Portland Avenue Sydenham Church Street George Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 1,080, /1/ to , Princess Road Battersea Road Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 495, /1/ to , Princess Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 180, /1/ to , Quarry Road Boyce Road Boyce Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Quarry Road Boyce Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 270, /1/ to , Quinn Road East Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , Quinn Road West Wilton Road 18 Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 465, /1/ to , Railton Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 540, /1/ to , Railton Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 165, /1/ to , Railton Road Stage Coach Road Sydenham Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Railton Road Sydenham Road Sydenham Road Collector Rural Asphalt Class $ 17, /1/ to Railton Road Sydenham Road Cliffside Lane Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 870, /1/ to , Railway Street Wilton Road 18 Road 38 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 62, /1/ to , Ramparts Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 275, to , Ramparts Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 275, /1/ to , Randy Clark Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Redmond Road Redmond Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 250, /1/ to , Redmond Road Redmond Road Holleford Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 75, /1/ to , Revell Road Bank Street Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 270, /1/ to , Reynolds Road Snider Road Snider Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 87, to , Rickards Road Rutledge Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 75, /1/ to , Rideau Road Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 285, /1/ to , Rideau Road Burnt Hills Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 25, /1/ to Ritchie Road Wilmer Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 50, /1/ to , Ritchie Road Wilmer Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 475, /1/ to , River Road Petworth Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 75, /1/ to , Rockwood Place Moreland Dixon Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 60, /1/ to , Rosedale Road Alton Road Freeman Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 405, /1/ to , Round Lake Road Moreland Dixon Road Latimer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Round Lake Road Latimer Road Latimer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Round Lake Road Latimer Road Latimer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Round Lake Road Latimer Road Latimer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 390, /1/ to , Round Lake Road Latimer Road Latimer Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Round Lake Road Latimer Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Roushorn Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Salmon Drive Lakeview Drive Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 120, /1/ to , Salmon Lake Road Bedford Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 630, /1/ to , Verona Sand Road Cross Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Verona Sand Road Cross Road Cross Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , Verona Sand Road Cross Road McMahon Drive Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 1,500, /1/ to , Verona Sand Road McMahon Drive Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 300, /1/ to , Sands Road Battersea Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 780, /1/ to , Sarah Street Water Street Battersea Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 240, /1/ to , Scanlan Court Scanlan Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 60, /1/ to , Scanlan Road Murvale Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 285, /1/ to , Scanlan Road Murvale Road Murvale Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Shales Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 775, /1/ to , Short Street Bank Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 60, /1/ to , Sills Bay Road Botting Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Silverwood Drive Holmes Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 285, /1/ to , Simpson Road Battersea Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 550, /1/ to , Snider Road Reynolds Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 600, /1/ to , Snider Road Reynolds Road Road 38 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 900, /1/ to , Sonneveld Road Washburn Road Sunbury Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 400, /1/ to , Split Rail Road Opinicon Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Spooner Road Latimer Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, /1/ to , Spooner Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , Spooner Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 165, /1/ to , Stage Coach Road Orser Road Railton Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 870, /1/ to , Stage Coach Road Railton Road Campbell Road Collector Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Stage Coach Road Campbell Road Rutledge Road Collector Urban Asphalt Class $ 780, /1/ to , Station Street Walker Street Bank Street Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 30, /1/ to , Steele Road Bradshaw Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 550, /1/ to , Steve Babcock Road James Wilson Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 87, /1/ to , Stone Point Road Hitchcock Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 345, /1/ to , Sumac Road Sydenham Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 345, /1/ to ,500
47 ID Street From To Classification Roadside Environment Surface Type Maintenace Class Length (m) Width (m) Shoulder Width (m) Pavement Area (m2) Inspection OCI (2013) Special Designation Health & Safety Risk Cost $/m assumed Value Estimate Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Sweetman Road Dewitt Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 150, to , Switzer Lane Portland Avenue Local Urban Gravel Class $ 50, /1/ to , Sydenham Church Street William Street Portland Avenue Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 480, /1/ to , Sydenham Cross Street Sydenham Mill Street Wheatley Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 180, /1/ to , Sydenham Walker Road Loughborough Portland Rock Quarry Lane Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 300, Road 11/1/ to , Sydenham Walker Road Rock Quarry Lane Sydenham Church Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 140, Street 11/1/ to , Sydenham William Street Rutledge Road Wheatley Street Collector Urban Asphalt Class $ 600, /1/ to , Tett Crescent Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 225, /1/ to , Timmerman Road James Wilson Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 250, /1/ to , Tobin Road Devil Lake Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 250, /1/ to , Tom Watson Road Watson Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 120, /1/ to , Trotter Road Shales Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 125, /1/ to , Trousdale Road Hinchinbrooke Road Holleford Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Twighlight Lane Maple Leaf Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 105, /1/ to , Valleyview Drive Cedarwoods Drive Local Urban Surface treated Class $ 150, /1/ to , Vanluven Road Holleford Road Loughborough Portland Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 720, Road 1/1/ to , Verona Street Lions Club Road Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 1,080, /1/ to , Vienna Crescent Sumac Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 105, /1/ to , Walker Street Verona Street Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 60, /1/ to , Wallace Road Camden Portland Mclean Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 990, Boundary Road 11/1/ to , Walsh Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 162, to , Walsh Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Gravel Class $ 162, /1/ to , Washburn Road Battersea Road Ida Hill Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 600, /1/ to , Washburn Road Ida Hill Road Bel Air Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 480, /1/ to , Washburn Road Bel Air Drive Bel Air Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 300, /1/ to , Washburn Road Bel Air Drive Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 945, /1/ to , Water Street Road 38 Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 180, /1/ to , Watson Road Petworth Road Boyce Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, /1/ to , Wellington Street Battersea Road United Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 300, /1/ to , Wellington Street United Street Milburn Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 165, /1/ to , Wellington Street Milburn Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Wheatley Street Rutledge Road George Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 660, /1/ to , White Lake Road Buck Bay Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 330, /1/ to , White Lake Road Buck Bay Road Buck Bay Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,710, /1/ to , White Lake Road Buck Bay Road Green Bay Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 750, /1/ to , White Road Westport Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 150, /1/ to , Whitty Road North Bradford Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 75, /1/ to , Whitty Road South Bradford Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 37, /1/ to , William Street Rutledge Road Church Street Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 240, (Harrowsmith) 1/1/ to , Wilmer Road Rutledge Road McFadden Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,425, /1/ to , Wilmer Road McFadden Road Ritchie Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 240, /1/ to , Wilmer Road Ritchie Road Norway Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 525, /1/ to , Wilmer Road Norway Road Perth Road 10 Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , Wilmer Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Rural Asphalt Class $ 17, /1/ to Wilmer Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent Local Urban Asphalt Class $ 60, /1/ to , Wilson Road Harrowsmith Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 200, /1/ to , Wolfe Lake Road Westport Road Local Rural Gravel Class $ 550, /1/ to , Wolfe Swamp Road Colebrook Road Petworth Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 870, /1/ to , Wurtz Court Road Vienna Crescent Vienna Crescent Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 15, /1/ to York Road Bellrock Road Local Rural Surface treated Class $ 390, /1/ to , Battersea Road Moreland Dixon Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,505, /1/ to , Battersea Road Moreland Dixon Road Sunbury Road Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 600, /1/ , Battersea Road Sunbury Road Larry York Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class School Zone/ 350 $ 1,820, Firehall 1/1/ to , Battersea Road Larry York Road Sarah Street Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 2,460, /1/ to , Battersea Road Sarah Street Burnt Hills Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 805, /1/ to , Battersea Road Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Battersea Road Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Arterial Urban Surface treated Class $ 180, /1/ to , Battersea Road Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 660, /1/ to , Battersea Road Burnt Hills Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,830, /1/ to , Bedford Road Portland Avenue Alton Road Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 600, /1/ , Bedford Road Alton Road Freeman Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,155, /1/ , Bedford Road Freeman Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 105, /1/ , Bedford Road Busch Lane Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,215, /1/ to , Bedford Road Busch Lane Salmon Lake Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 720, /1/ to , Bedford Road Salmon Lake Road Salmon Lake Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 720, /1/ to , Bedford Road Salmon Lake Road Desert Lake Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 720, /1/ to , Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 4,020, /1/ to , Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Long Swamp Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 105, /1/ to , Bellrock Road Long Swamp Road Cross Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 770, /1/ to , Bellrock Road Cross Road Road 38 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 455, /1/ , Desert Lake Road Road 38 High Falls Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 885, /1/ to , Desert Lake Road High Falls Road High Falls Road Arterial Urban Surface treated Class $ 990, /1/ to , Desert Lake Road High Falls Road Bauder Drive Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 465, /1/ , Desert Lake Road Bauder Drive Deyos Road Arterial Urban Surface treated Class $ 1,050, /1/ to , Desert Lake Road Deyos Road Holleford Road Arterial Urban Surface treated Class $ 90, /1/ to , Desert Lake Road Holleford Road Arterial Urban Surface treated Class $ 195, /1/ to , Desert Lake Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 60, /1/ , Desert Lake Road Bedford Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 510, /1/ to , Harrowsmith Road Road 38 Loughborough Portland Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 4,320, Road 1/1/ to , Moreland Dixon Road Perth Road 10 Battersea Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,452, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 Spooner Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,890, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 840, /1/ to ,000 Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Install / Last Reconstruct Date Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on Risk) Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Timing of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year
48 ID Street From To Classification Roadside Environment Surface Type Maintenace Class Length (m) Width (m) Shoulder Width (m) Pavement Area (m2) Inspection OCI (2013) Special Designation Health & Safety Risk Cost $/m assumed Value Estimate Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Perth Road 10 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,085, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,855, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent Perth Road Crescent Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 490, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class HIGH 350 $ 1,120, /1/ , Perth Road 10 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 70, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class HIGH 350 $ 2,432, /1/ , Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road Roushorn Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 105, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road McComish Lane Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 770, /1/ to , Perth Road 10 McComish Lane Arterial Rural Asphalt Class HIGH 350 $ 1,802, /1/ , Road 38 Kingston Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,872, /1/ to , Road 38 Kingston Road Kingston Road Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 600, /1/ to , Road 38 Kingston Road Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 960, /1/ to , Road 38 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,662, /1/ to , Road 38 Lions Club Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,365, /1/ to , Road 38 Lions Club Road Pine Ridge Road Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 1,440, /1/ to , Road 38 Pine Ridge Road Desert Lake Road Arterial Urban Asphalt Class School Zone/ 1200 $ 600, Firehall 1/1/ to , Road 38 Desert Lake Road Piccadilly Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,085, /1/ to , Road 38 Piccadilly Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 262, /1/ to , Road 38 Bradshaw Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,155, /1/ to , Rutledge Road Loughborough Portland Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 490, Road 1/1/ to , Rutledge Road Wheatley Street Arterial Urban Asphalt Class School Zone HIGH 1200 $ 660, /1/ , Rutledge Road Wheatley Street Storm Haven Lane Arterial Urban Asphalt Class School Zone HIGH 1200 $ 1,320, /1/ , Rutledge Road Storm Haven Lane Sydenham Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 962, /1/ to , Rutledge Road Sydenham Road Perth Road 10 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,995, /1/ to , Sunbury Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,330, /1/ to , Sunbury Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,860, /1/ to , Sunbury Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 210, /1/ to , Sunbury Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 750, /1/ to , Sunbury Road Battersea Road Sunbury Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 195, /1/ to , Sydenham Mill Street Rutledge Road Wheatley Street Arterial Urban Asphalt Class $ 840, /1/ to , Sydenham Road Horning Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 700, /1/ to , Sydenham Road Orser Road Rutledge Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,837, /1/ to , Sydenham Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 122, /1/ to , Westport Road Buck Bay Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 810, /1/ to , Westport Road Buck Bay Road New Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 2,310, /1/ to , Westport Road New Road Burridge Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 1,020, /1/ to , Westport Road Burridge Road Wolfe Lake Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 750, /1/ to , Westport Road Canoe Lake Road Canoe Lake Road Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 455, /1/ to , Westport Road Wolfe Lake Road Bresee Road Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 360, /1/ to , Westport Road Bresee Road Concession 12 Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 420, /1/ to , Westport Road Concession 12 Arterial Rural Surface treated Class $ 405, /1/ to , Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,260, /1/ to , Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 Road 38 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class School Zone 350 $ 1,155, /1/ to , Yarker Road 4 Camden Portland Wilton Road 18 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 1,312, Boundary Road 1/1/ to , Yarker Road 4 Wilton Road 18 Road 38 Arterial Rural Asphalt Class $ 717, /1/ to ,917 $ 269,691, ,989,700 Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Install / Last Reconstruct Date Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on Risk) Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Timing of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year
49 Bridges & Culverts Site No. Name Bridge/ Culvert Type Road Class Posted Speed Year Constructed/ Rehabilitated # of Spans Total Length (m) Width (m) Existing Surface Area (m2) Historical Cost ($) Cost ($000) BCI Health & Safety Risk % Useful Life Remaining (based on age) Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Inst Year Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Battersea Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Arterial % based on life cycle $ 6, Loughborough Lake Bridge Bridge I beam or Girders Arterial % based on life cycle $ 36, Bear Creek Culvert Culvert Rectangular Culvert Arterial % based on life cycle $ 10, Buck Lake Culvert Culvert Round Culvert Arterial % to $ 5, Sydenham Road Culvert Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 7, Burago Lane Culvert Bridge Round Culvert % to $ 2, Rutledge Road Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Collector % based on life cycle $ 5, Sydenham Lake Bridge and Dam Bridge Rectangle Culvert Collector % based on life cycle $ 5, Little Long Lake Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ 4, Otter Lake Culvert Bridge Arch Culvert Collector % to $ 4, Murvale Creek Culvert Bridge Arch Culvert Arterial % based on life cycle $ 7, Bracken Culvert Bridge Arch Culvert Arterial % to $ 6, Culvert Under Road 38 Bridge Rectangular Culvert Arterial % to $ 7, Depot Creek Culvert Bridge Collector % based on life cycle $ 12, Bellrock Rd. Culvert Bridge Rectangular Culvert Collector % based on life cycle $ 4, High Falls Bridge (Rock Lake Bridge) Bridge Rectangular Culvert Collector % based on life cycle $ 5, Road 38 Bridge #19 Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Arterial % to $ 7, Devil Lake Culvert Bridge Round Culvert Collector % to $ 5, Bedford Mills Bridge Bridge T Beam Arterial % to $ 12, Sunbury Road Canal Overpass Bridge I beam or Girders Arterial % based on life cycle $ 57, Bedford Mills Road Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ 1, Massasauga Road Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ 1, Bunker Hill Road North culvert Culvert Rectangle Culvert % based on life cycle $ 3, Bunker Hill Road Bridge CSP Local % based on life cycle $ Buck Bay Road Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ 1, Green Bay Road Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ 1, Buck Bay Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 4, Fish Creek Bridge Bridge T Beam Local % to $ 2, Eagle Creek Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ 1, th Concession Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 1, Colebrook Road Culvert Bridge Arch Culvert Local % based on life cycle $ 2, Watson Road Culvert Bridge Local % based on life cycle $ 2, First Lake Road Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 5, Craig Creek Culvert Bridge Arch Culvert Local % based on life cycle $ 4, Long Swamp Road Bridge Bridge I beam or Girders Local % to $ 3, Shales Road Culvert Bridge Frame, Inclined Legs Local % to $ 1, Railton Road Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 1, Church Street Culve Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 3, Salmon Lake Road Culvert / Otter Lake Bridge Round Culvert Collector % to $ Mitchell Creek Bridge Bridge Earth Filled Arch Local % based on life cycle $ 4, Milburn Creek Culvert Bridge Local % based on life cycle $ 7, Boss Marsh Culvert Bridge Round Culvert Local % to $ 6, Stafford Lane Culvert Bridge Arch Culvert Local % to $ 1, Opinicon Lake Bridge Bridge I beam or Girders Local % to $ 4, Buck Bay Road Bridge Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 1, Clair Road Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs % to $ 1, Hardwood Creek (Verona Bridge) Bridge I beam or Girders Arterial % based on life cycle $ 12, Maynard Structure Bridge I beam or Girders Local % based on life cycle $ 16, Petworth Road Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ 1, Petworth Bridge Bridge Through Truss Arterial % based on life cycle $ 6, Perth Road Culvert Culvert Arch Culvert Arterial % to $ 3, Morland Dixon Culvert Culvert Round Culvert Arterial % based on life cycle $ 3, Culvert #3 Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ 1, Latimer Road Culvert Culvert Rectangle Culvert Local % based on life cycle $ 2, Culvert #5 Culvert Hybrid Local % to $ 1, Culvert #6 Culvert Rectangle Culvert Arterial % to $ 1, Culvert #7 Culvert Rectangle Culvert Arterial to $ 1, Hinchenbrooke Road Culvert Culvert Rectangle Culvert Local % to $ 3, Culvert #9 (North Shore) Culvert Hybrid Local % to $ Culvert #10 (James Wilson) Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % based on life cycle $ Colebrooke Rd. East Culvert Bridge Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Local % to $ $ 25,200,815 $ 349, Timing of First (based on life cycle) Timing of First (based on risk) Timing of Second (life cycle) Timing of Third (life cycle) Investment/ year
50 Water Treatment and Storage Facilities Type Asset Description Construction Year Useful Life Historical Construction Cost 2013 Cost* Health & Safety Risk % Useful Life Remaining (based on age) Condition/Probability of Consequence of Failure Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 (1 = low, 5 = high) = poor/likely) Inst Year Useful Life (yrs) Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First (based on life cycle) WTP Raw Water Intake $227, $ 287, % based on life cycle $ 2, Storage Elevated Water Storage Tower $996, $ 1,261, % based on life cycle $ 12, WTP Treatment Plant $2,971, $ 3,763, % based on life cycle $ 75, WTP Plant Upgrades (UV & GAC contactors) $1,009, $ 1,103, % based on life cycle $ 44, Timing of First Timing of Second (Life Cycle) Timing of Third (Life Cycle) Tming of Fourth (Life Cycle) Investment/ year WTP Capital Investment TOTAL $5,204, $6,416, $ 134, Forecasted Capital Upgrades / Investment (Utilities Kingston) Facilities Treatment Plant Building Structure $ 11,000 $ 7,100 Building Fixtures Mechanical Equipment $ 4,300 $ 11,600 $ 8,530 $ 250,000 $ 12,800 Electrical Equipment $ 11,000 $ 7,900 $ 7,100 $ 17,500 $ 39,400 Tankage $ 10,700 $ 12,200 WTP Sub Total $ $ $ 15,000 $ 22,000 $ 7,900 $ 18,700 $ 7,100 $ 20,730 $ 267,500 $ 12,800 $ 39,400 Storage Building Structure $ 4,300 $ 81,200 $ 5,000 $ 393,600 Building Fixtures Mechanical Equipment Electrical Equipment $ 3,200 Tankage Storage Sub Total $ $ $ 7,500 $ $ $ 81,200 $ $ $ 5,000 $ $ 393,600 Pipes Linear Pipes $ 4,100 $ 4,400 Valves $ 6,100 $ 7,700 Hydrants $ 3,500 $ 3,600 $ 3,800 $ 3,900 $ 3,960 Pipes Sub Total $ 3,500 $ 7,700 $ 3,800 $ 8,300 $ 3,960 $ $ $ 6,100 $ $ 7,700 $ Other Meters $ 1,380 Other Sub Total $ $ $ $ 1,380 $ $ 2,900 $ 2,900 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 TOTAL $ 3,500 $ 7,700 $ 26,300 $ 31,680 $ 11,860 $ 102,800 $ 10,000 $ 29,830 $ 275,500 $ 23,500 $ 436,000
51 Watermains DESCRIPTION DIAMETER (mm) LENGTH (m) QUANTITY MATERIAL UNIT PRICE ($) CONST YEAR USEFUL LIFE (YRS) HISTORIC COST 2013 Cost (inflation accounted) * Cost ($/unit) 2013 Cost Health & Safety Risk REMAINING LIFE (YRS) % Useful Life Remaining (based on age) Condition/Probability of Consequence of Failure (1 Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = = low, 5 = high) poor/likely) Inst Year Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Water Main $ 239, $ 303, $ 538, % based on life cycle $ 3, Water Main $ 912, $ 1,155, $ 1,920, % based on life cycle $ 14, Water Main $ 65, $ 83, $ 109, % based on life cycle $ 1, Water Main $ $ 1, $ 2, % based on life cycle $ Water Servicing Piping $ 298, $ 378, $ 498, % based on life cycle $ 4, Water Servicing Piping $ 4, $ 5, $ 5, % based on life cycle $ Water Servicing Piping $ 17, $ 22, $ 20, % based on life cycle $ Water Course Crossing George St $ 20, $ 25, $ 25, % based on life cycle $ Water Course Crossing Church St $ 10, $ 12, $ 12, % based on life cycle $ Water Course Crossing Rutledge Rd $ 10, $ 12, $ 12, % based on life cycle $ Fire Hydrant Set $ 136, $ 172, $ 172, % based on life cycle $ 2, Timing of First Based on life cycle Timing of First Timing of Second Investment/ year 6368 $ 3,317, $ 27,145.77
52 Storm Sewers LOCATION MATERIAL DIAMETER (mm) LENGTH (m) Construction Year Structural Grade Operational Grade Unit Cost ()* Value Estimate Health & Safety Risk % Useful Life Remaining (based on age) Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) Inst Year Useful Life Risk Timing of First Based on Risk Timing of First Based on Risk, then lifecycle Amelia St Polyethelene $ 86, to $ 1, Brewery St Polyethelene $ 106, to $ 1, Brewery St & Mill St PVC $ 7, to $ Church St Polyethelene $ 9, to $ George St PVC $ 75, to $ George St PVC $ 8, to $ George St PVC $ 73, to $ Mill St PVC $ 234, to $ 2, Mill St PVC $ 175, to $ 2, Point Rd Steel $ 76, to $ Portland Ave Unknown $ 150, to $ 1, Portland Ave Unknown $ 252, to $ 3, Rutledge Rd PVC $ 522, to $ 6, Rutledge Rd Steel $ 262, to $ 3, Stage Coach Rd Polyethelene $ 101, to $ 1, Wheatley St $ 45, to $ Wheatley St $ 222, to $ 2, Wheatley St Polyethelene $ 99, to $ 1, Wheatley St PVC $ 91, to $ 1, William St PVC $ 96, to $ 1, William St Polyethelene $ 25, to $ William St PVC $ 26, to $ William St & Brewery St $ 10, to $ km $ 2,759,485 $ 34, Timing of Second Timing of Third Investment/ year
The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan
The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan December 013 Adopted by Council March 4, 014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION....1 Vision.... What is Asset Management?....3 Link to
Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan
Township of Enniskillen Asset Management Plan 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Introduction 3 B. State of Local Infrastructure 4 C. Desired Levels of Service 7 D. Asset Management Strategy 8 E. Financing
Township of Terrace Bay Drinking Water System Financial Plan
Township of Terrace Bay Drinking Water System Financial Plan August 2014 Introduction Municipalities in Ontario recently adopted a full accrual accounting approach to tangible municipal assets in accordance
TOWN OF GRIMSBY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
TOWN OF GRIMSBY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN August 20, 2014 DFA Infrastructure International Inc. Executive Summary ES1 Background The Town of Grimsby (Town) with a population of approximately 25,325 is located
Asset Management Plan Final Report
AssetManagementPlan FinalReport DillonConsultingLimited 10FifthStreetSouth Chatham,ONN7M4V4 T:519-352-7802 F:519-354-2050 May,2014 www.dillon.ca EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public infrastructure is central to our
Township of Amaranth. Asset Management Plan Report
Township of Amaranth Prepared By: R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 15 Townline Orangeville ON L9W 3R4 Prepared for: Township of Amaranth File No: 300033404 The material in this report reflects best judgement
Town of Mattawa Asset Management Plan. December 2013
Town of Mattawa Asset Management Plan December 2013 2 P a g e Town of Mattawa Asset Management Plan Executive Summary This Asset Management Plan is intended to describe the infrastructure owned, operated,
Town of Huntsville Municipal Asset Management Plan
Town of Huntsville Municipal Asset Management Plan Adopted by Council (Resolution 470-13) December 20, 2013 1 P age Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction... 4 State of Local Infrastructure...
The Corporation of the Municipality of Callander. Asset Management Plan
The Corporation of the Municipality of Callander Asset Management Plan April 2014 1 Index A) Executive Summary P. 3 B) Introduction P. 4 C) State of Local Infrastructure P. 7 D) Expected Levels of Service
2014 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Building, Stormwater & Linear Transportation
2014 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Building, Stormwater & Linear Transportation Version 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 5 1.1 Background... 5 1.2 State of Local Infrastructure... 5 1.3 Desired Levels
How To Manage The County Of Simcoe'S Infrastructure
Asset Management Plan Asset Management Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary... 2 2.0 Introduction... 4 3.0 State of County of Simcoe s Infrastructure... 7 4.0 Levels of Service... 14 5.0 Asset
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Asset Management Relationships and Dependencies. Introduction
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Asset Management Plan demonstrates sound stewardship of the Region s existing assets to support services at desired levels and to ensure the support of the Region s infrastructure
Asset Management Plan
Asset Management Plan Final Report May 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Adequate municipal infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and underground water and sewage pipes are essential to economic development, citizen
Bridges & Culverts Condition by Quantity
3.4.3 What condition is it in? Approximately 93% of the municipality s bridge structures are in good to excellent condition, with the remaining 7% in fair condition. As a result, the municipality received
County of Oxford Asset Management Plan 2014. 1.0 Executive Summary... 2. 2.0 Introduction... 7. 3.0 Purpose and Methodology... 10
Asset Management Plan AUGUST 2014 County of Oxford Asset Management Plan 2014 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary... 2 2.0 Introduction... 7 3.0 Purpose and Methodology... 10 4.0 State of Infrastructure...
Water Rate Study & O.Reg.453/07 Water Financial Plan No.103-301A
March 2, 2012 dfa DFA Infrastructure International Inc. dfa DFA Infrastructure International Inc. 33 Raymond Street St. Catharines Ontario Canada L2R 2T3 Telephone: (905) 938-0965 Fax: (905) 937-6568 March
Minto Asset Management Plan
Minto Asset Management Plan 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 What the Municipality Provides The Town of Minto has a significant portfolio of community assets under its care and control. These assets form an integral
Asset Management Plan
Asset Management Plan Contents Executive Summary... 4 Asset Management Plan... 6 Introduction... 6 Financial Overview... 11 Conclusion... 11 Attached Appendices... 11 Asset Management Strategy... 13 Introduction...
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Tof Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3 OVERVIEW 8 FACILITIES 12 FLEET 16 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 19 ROADWAYS 23 BRIDGES 26 WATER RELATED ASSETS 2 One of the goals
Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Annexation Proposed by the Town of Beaumont. Leduc County FINAL REPORT
Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Annexation Proposed by the Town of Beaumont Leduc County FINAL REPORT Suite 2220 Sun Life Place 10123 99 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3H1 T 780.425.6741 F 780.426.3737 www.think-applications.com
LONDON CORPORATE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014
LONDON CORPORATE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Acknowledgement The Corporate Asset Management office would like to acknowledge the efforts of the staff of the individual City of London Service
cugog TOWNSHIP OF Ian
TOWNSHIP OF cugog EDUCATION AND TRAINING SESSION AGENDA MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2013 AT 9:00 A.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Road and Bridge Asset Management Plan The What and the How 9:00 a.m. The What Ian Roger
Asset Management Plan 2015 Facilities and Transit
Asset Management Plan 2015 Facilities and Transit Prepared for Submitted by October 2015 Asset Management Plan Contents Section 1 Executive Summary Table of Content Section 2 Introduction Section 3 State
Asset Management Plan Public Works and Social Housing Infrastructure City of Brantford, Ontario
2013 Asset Management Plan Asset Management Plan City of Brantford, Ontario November 29, 2013 Prepared by: Capital Planning Facilities and Asset Management, Public Works Corporation of the City of Brantford
RE: 2014 Asset Management Plan. OBJECTIVE: To present Council with an Asset Management Plan and recommended implementation strategy moving forward.
HALDIMAND COUNTY Report PW-GM-01-2014 of the General Manager of Public Works For Consideration by RE: 2014 Asset Management Plan OBJECTIVE: To present Council with an Asset Management Plan and recommended
The Town of Fort Frances
The Town of Fort Frances Long-Term Capital Financial Plan POLICY Resolution Number: 391 (Consent) 12/09 SECTION ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE NEW: December 2009 REVISED: Supercedes Resolution No. Policy Number:
Capital Asset Management Plan
2015 Capital Asset Management Plan City of Peterborough 12/15/2015 Executive Summary Asset management planning supports evidence based decisions regarding the building, operating, maintaining, renewing,
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL WATER AND WASTEWATER ONTARIO REGULATION 453/07 FINANCIAL PLAN
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL WATER AND WASTEWATER ONTARIO REGULATION 453/07 FINANCIAL PLAN Financial Plan #022-301 JUNE 3, 2010 CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study Purpose 1-1 1.2 Background 1-1 1.2.1 Financial
STANDARDIZED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE STATE AND CONDITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN EDMONTON
STANDARDIZED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE STATE AND CONDITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN EDMONTON Theresa Cloake, P.Eng. Infrastructure Analyst and K.L. Siu, P.Eng. Senior Infrastructure Officer Office
CGAM022.1/12/10. Asset Management Improvement Strategy 2010
Asset Management Improvement Strategy 2010 Version Control Version No. Date Details Author/s 1.0 July 2009 Adopted Strategy 2.0 October 2010 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS OF CONTENTS 4 OF THE ASSET MANAGEMENT
MUNICIPAL ASSET MANAGEMENT & FINANCIAL PLANNING A CASE STUDY: THE TOWNSHIP OF SCUGOG
MUNICIPAL ASSET MANAGEMENT & FINANCIAL PLANNING IN SMALLER MUNICIPALITIES A CASE STUDY: THE TOWNSHIP OF SCUGOG JULY 2012 By: David A. Stewart THE PAPER VS. THE PRESENTATION The Paper Includes A literature
Table of Contents. WATER AND WASTEWATER MODEL AND SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS 6 Model Development 6 10-Year Water/WW - Challenges, Risks and Opportunities 7
Table of Contents LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLAN INTRODUCTION 1 Water and Wastewater Financial Plan 2 What is a Long Range Financial Plan 3 Importance of a Long Range Financial Plan 4 General Approach to Preparing
City of Brantford Water and Wastewater Ontario Regulation 453/07 Financial Plans. Financial Plan #063-301
City of Brantford Water and Wastewater Ontario Regulation 453/07 Financial Plans Financial Plan #063-301 May 26, 2015 Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (i) 1. Introduction... 1-1 1.1 Study Purpose... 1-1
STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DATE: November 7 2012 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ATTACHMENT(S): COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE GINA LAYTE-LISTON, SUPERVISOR, WASTEWATER Stormwater Management Funding Strategy None
ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
AGLG Perspectives Series Accessible Tools Audit Topic 3 - Tool 2 (July, 2015) ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Key Considerations for Local Government Council, Board Members and Staff to Help You
Financial Statement Guide. A Guide to Local Government Financial Statements
Financial Statement Guide A Guide to Local Government Financial Statements January, 2012 Ministry of Community, Sport and 1 Financial Statement Guide Table of Contents Introduction Legislative Requirements
2015-18 Department Business Plan. Utilities
2015-18 Department Business Plan Utilities I am pleased to introduce Utilities 2015-18 Department Business Plan. The goals capture four main areas where Utilities will contribute to making Strathcona County
REPORT CITY OF WATERLOO ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER 2014
REPORT CITY OF WATERLOO ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER 2014 City of Waterloo Asset Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Waterloo has prepared this asset management plan in accordance with the Ministry
The Corporation of the Town of Amherstburg, Ontario ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Corporation of the Town of Amherstburg, Ontario ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2013 Asset Management Plan Preface An Asset Management Plan is a strategy that identifies how municipal assets will be
Infrastructure assets are distinguished from other capital assets because they normally:
4. REPORTING 4.2 Government-Wide Financial Statements 4.2.6 Infrastructure Reporting 4.2.6.10 Governments are required to report all of their capital assets in the statement of net position. Infrastructure
Policies & Procedures
Budget and Business Plan 2015 Policies & Procedures POLICIES & PROCEDURES Policies & Procedures Presentation of Halton Region s Financial Information General Guidelines Halton Region prepares and presents
Our Challenging Future
Protecting Our Future by Making Advanced Asset Management Decisions < All stories in this section Gregory M. Baird Dec 23, 2011 America s economic dominance as a world power over the past several decades
Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy
Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy Policy Statement A policy governing the use and administration of capital financing and debt Purpose This policy establishes objectives, standards of care,
Engineering. 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 Major Service Actual Budget Projected Request Executive Adopted
Engineering Agency Number: 53 Budget Function: Public Works and Transportation The Engineering Division is responsible for the design, supervision and inspection of all street, highway, sidewalk and bike
DESCRIPTION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING SYSTEM Livingston s accounting system is organized on the basis of Accounting Funds, each of which is considered a separate government activity with its
Asset Management Plan
Corporation of the Town of Innisfil Asset Management Plan Prepared by: AECOM 55 Cedar Pointe Drive, Suite 620 705 721 9222 tel Barrie, ON, Canada L4N 5R7 705 734 0764 fax www.aecom.com Project Number:
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN DECEMBER 2013 (Released in August 2014) Asset management planning is the process of making the best possible decisions regarding the building, operating, maintaining, renewing, replacing
Financial Plan #203-301B
The Corporation of the Township of Whitewater Region Financial Plan #203-301B Cobden Drinking Water System Licence #203-101 Beachburg Drinking Water System Licence #203-102 Haley Drinking Water System
PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURES MANUAL LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE
REGION OF PEEL PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURES MANUAL LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE Storm Sewer Design Criteria REVISED July 2009 PUBLIC WORKS STORM SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0
0.0 Curb Radii Guidelines Version 1.0.2
Background In early 2014, Transportation Services initiated a review of the Division's design guidelines and standards to move our organization in a direction consistent with the transportation departments
This plan forms one part of a suite of Asset Management Plans that have been developed:
E: D1: Levee Footpath Bank Asset Management Plan March July 2014 2015 This plan forms one part of a suite of Asset Management Plans that have been developed: A. Bridges B. Buildings C. Drainage D. Footpaths
BUILDING TOGETHER. Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans. Ministry of Infrastructure
BUILDING TOGETHER Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans Ministry of Infrastructure Letter from the Minister of Infrastructure and Minister of Transportation Infrastructure investments are vital to
COMPREHENSIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
COMPREHENSIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY APPROVED BY SENIOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ON AUGUST 23, 2012 (TO BE FINALIZED AFTER APPROVAL OF CAM POLICY BY COUNCIL) August 2012 Contents CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bond Release Process for New Subdivision Developments in Fairfax County
Bond Release Process for New Subdivision Developments in Fairfax County An Overview for Homeowners Associations A Fairfax County, Va., publication April 2009 For more information or to request this document
Drinking Water Quality Management System Financial Plan Number 047-101 O.Reg. 453/07
Drinking Water Quality Management System Financial Plan Number 047-101 O.Reg. 453/07 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF Contents... 2 1. INTRODUCTION... 4 1.1 MUNICIPAL DRINKING WATER LICENSING PROGRAM... 4 1.2
County of Peterborough Capital Asset Management Plan - Review
2013 County of Peterborough Capital Asset Management Plan December 18, 2013 Capital Asset Management Plan Preface The County of Peterborough owns, operates, and maintains a wide ranging inventory of tangible
Operations Committee. District Engineer and Utilities Manager. Appendix A: Significance Assessment
Report To: From: Operations Committee District Engineer and Utilities Manager Date: Thursday, 3 July 2014 File reference: Document: 1227007 Appendix A: Significance Assessment Decision-making: Subject:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 2020
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 2020 1 Purpose of Strategic Plan This document serves as the road map for the Public Works Department. It identifies where we are going and how we are going
DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. August 10, 2015 WEST BOYLSTON TOWN HALL, BOARD MEETING ROOM. 140 Worcester Street WEST BOYLSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM
DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING August 10, 2015 AT WEST BOYLSTON TOWN HALL, BOARD MEETING ROOM 140 Worcester Street WEST BOYLSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM FOR THE PROPOSED Rehabilitation & Stormwater Improvements
The Bond Release Process for New Subdivision Developments: An Overview for Homeowners Associations DRAFT 6-4-08. Revised 9-25-08
The Bond Release Process for New Subdivision Developments: An Overview for Homeowners Associations DRAFT 6-4-08. Revised 9-25-08 Fairfax County requires developers to post a performance bond if they are
Chapter 13: Implementation Plan
Chapter 13: 13.1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the implementation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan is to set forth the actions that the City will take to ensure that the plans, programs and policies set
Aquatera 2015/16 Business Plan Highlights
Who We Are Aquatera 2015/16 Business Plan Highlights Aquatera is a full-service utility corporation the provider of choice for governments, businesses, and communities. Our business is to provide high-quality
The Roads to Recovery. Facts About Transportation Funding and Spending
The Roads to Recovery Facts About Transportation Funding and Spending How Pima County spends transportation money (F.Y. 2014-15 Transportation Budget) 1 Debt Service (1997 bonds): $19.1 million In 1997,
Asset Management Guidance for Wastewater and Stormwater Systems
Asset Management Guidance for Wastewater and Stormwater Systems What is Asset Management? Wastewater and stormwater systems are made up of assets; some are buried assets and invisible, while the rest are
Asset Management Primer. the Canadian Infrastructure Report Card
Canadian Infrastructure Report Card Asset Management Primer the Canadian Infrastructure Report Card For more information on this Report Card, or the project, please contact [email protected].
Page 1 of 24. To present the Asset Management Policy 2014 for Council adoption.
Page 1 of 24 COMMUNITY AND SERVICES SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 9 DECEMBER 2104 AGENDA ITEM 6.1 ASSET MANAGEMENT POLICY 2014 REVIEW Director: Manager: Ian Butterworth Director Infrastructure and Engineering
THE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ASHFIELD-COLBORNE-WAWANOSH
THE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ASHFIELD-COLBORNE-WAWANOSH 2013 SUBMITTED DECEMBER 2013 BY PUBLIC SECTOR DIGEST 148 FULLARTON STREET, SUITE 1410 LONDON, ONTARIO, N6A 5P3 State of the Infrastructure
8.1.3 General Design Guidelines. The following guidelines shall be used when designing inlets along a street section:
. Introduction Presented in this chapter are the criteria and methodology for design and evaluation of storm sewer inlets located in Town of Castle Rock. The review of all planning submittals will be based
Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011
Iowa Smart Planning Legislative Guide March 2011 Rebuild Iowa Office Wallace State Office Building 529 East 9 th St Des Moines, IA 50319 515-242-5004 www.rio.iowa.gov Iowa Smart Planning Legislation The
Chapter 7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES and SERVICES PLAN
Chapter 7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES and SERVICES PLAN Introduction Community facilities play an important role in ensuring a quality standard of living for Township residents, as well as impacting the location
If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1100 ext. 2305
If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1100 ext. 2305 The Regional Municipality of Durham Report to: The Finance & Administration Committee From: R.J. Clapp,
City of Sacramento, California Department of Utilities. March 2011
Department of Utilities Utility Rate Study March 2011 March, 2011 page i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 SECTION I: INTRODUCTION... 13 SECTION II: FINANCIAL POLICIES... 15 A. Defining Revenue
Managing Capital Assets
Managing Capital Assets A New Emphasis on a Traditional Role By Public Sector Digest Research and Shayne Kavanagh Capital asset management has become a topic of increasing interest for local governments,
Appendix D: 2015 Program & Service Budget
Appendix D: 2015 Program & Service Budget Program & Service Budget by Program.. 1 Program & Service Budget by Sub-Program....... 2 Program & Service Budget by Service.... 3 Program & Service Budget by
Asset Management Plan
Wandering Shire Council Roads Asset Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary... 2 Context... 2 Questions you may have... 4 2. INTRODUCTION... 5 2.1 Background... 5 2.2 Goals and objectives
City of Cambridge and IBM Build a Smarter City
City of Cambridge and IBM Build a Smarter City September 8, 2010 Presented by Mike Hausser, P.Eng Director of Asset Management and Support Services City of Cambridge Infrastructure Asset Life Cycle Install
Table of Contents ALPHABETIZED LIST OF CIP PROJECTS... 1 CIP 5 YEAR SUMMARY BY CATEGORY... 18 SMART CITY CIP 5 YEAR SUMMARY BY VISION...
Table of Contents ALPHABETIZED LIST OF CIP PROJECTS... 1 CIP 5 YEAR SUMMARY BY VISION... 5 CIP 5 YEAR SUMMARY BY CATEGORY... 18 SMART CITY CIP 5 YEAR SUMMARY BY VISION... 33 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
10.0 ASSET MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
10.0 ASSET MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 10.1 Current Asset Management Practices This section outlines the decision making tools Taupo District Council (TDC) currently uses to determine long term maintenance, renewal
Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:
Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota Land Use Goals: 1. Growth in Wadena will be undertaken in such a manner as to create a full range of living, working, shopping,
SERVICING REPORT SITE PLAN AND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM BLOCK 53 FERRIS DRIVE PLAN 58M-379 & PART OF LOT 4, REGISTERED PLAN 622 WELLESLEY, ONTARIO
BLOCK 53 FERRIS DRIVE PLAN 58M-379 & PART OF LOT 4, REGISTERED PLAN 622 WELLESLEY, ONTARIO MARCH 2014 BLOCK 53 Ferris Drive Plan 58M-379 & Part of Lot 4, Registered Plan 622 WELLESLEY, ONTARIO DOCUMENT
ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES. for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS City of Birmingham Department of Planning, Engineering and Permits Engineering Division Office of the City Engineer 2008 TABLE
Transportation and Public Works. Business Plan 2002-2003
Business Plan 2002-2003 March 27, 2002 Mission Transportation and Public Works Construct, maintain and manage provincial highways, buildings and related infrastructure, and provide accommodation, property
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Town of Newmarket
Town of Newmarket December 23, 2014 1 Acknowledgements The development of the Town of Newmarket s first Asset Management Plan was based on the contributions of many Town staff. This acknowledgement is
