Prepared For. The Preserve at Sharp Mountain 134 Westview Drive Jasper, Georgia Attention: Jerry Givan. Reserve Study
|
|
|
- Lynette Clarke
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Prepared For The Preserve at Sharp Mountain 134 Westview Drive Attention: Jerry Givan Reserve Study At The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Version 1.0 Project #: 11L-102 February 10, 2011 Prepared By: Greg Lason Greg L. Lason, R.S. WEC Sr. Project Engineer Prepared and Reviewed By: John Mercer John Mercer Senior Consultant
2 Reesseerrvvee Stuuddyy Reeppoorrt t 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION GOALS SCOPE OF WORK ASSUMPTIONS DISCLOSURES FIELD ASSESSMENT (Part 1) ASHPALT PAVEMENT RESURFACING CONCRETE CURBING WOOD RAIL FENCING SITE LIGHTING SITE FURNISHINGS RETENTION POND WELL AND WATERFALL PUMPS MASONRY TUCKPOINTING GAZEBO LODGE SIGNAGE ENTRANCE GATE LANDSCAPING WATER STORAGE TANK EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEMENTS INTERIOR BUILDING ELEMENTS RESERVE ANALYSIS (Part 2) LONG TERM REVIEW Phhoot tooggrraapphhss Appppeennddi ixx A Exhibit 1 Element Expense Summary Exhibit 2 Present Day Annual Expense Summary (6 pages) Exhibit 3 Inflated Annual Expense Summary (6 pages) Exhibit 4 Recommended Reserve Funding Plan (Expense Data Taken from Exhibit 3) Exhibit 5 Graphical Illustration of Exhibit 4 Exhibit 6 Current Fund Status
3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Reserve Study was conducted for The Preserve at Sharp Mountain to determine a reasonable level of annual reserve fund contributions required to meet the future expenditures for the elements on the property that will likely require major repairs or replacements over the next 30-year period. The elements that have been included in the Reserve Study are considered common to the property as defined by the Association s declarations and bylaws, unless otherwise noted. Part 1 - Field Assessment Part 1 of the Reserve Study involved a visual inspection of the property to assess the general condition and obtain the necessary quantities and specifications of the major elements that will likely require repair or replacement over the next 30 years. A summary of the property data is as follows: Property Data Building Style # of Units/Lots # of Buildings Year(s) Constructed Lodge & Amenities ~2003 Overall, the property appears to be in satisfactory condition. However, during the course of the field inspection, some specific deficiencies were observed such as: Asphalt road deterioration, settlement Observation deck deterioration Road Sign deterioration Lodge fireplace firebrick cracked See the photograph section of this report for a detailed description of these and any other observed deficiencies. Part 2 - Reserve Analysis Part 2 of the Reserve Study involved an analysis based on a 30-year period. The latest version of the R.S. Means Repair and Remodeling Cost Data, along with other reliable cost resources, were used to determine the present day repair or replacement expenses for each of the elements as illustrated in Exhibit 1. To determine the future repair or replacement expenses over the next 30-year period, the present day expenses have been inflated at an annual rate of 3.82%. The present day expenses are inflated to account for historical increases in construction costs. The inflation rate was determined using the average of the last 20 years of the RS Means Historical Cost Indexes for Atlanta, Georgia. Given the present day expense, the future expense is calculated using the future value of a single amount formula as follows: where F = P (1 + IR) n F = future expense P = present day expense IR = inflation rate expressed as a decimal n = number of years until future expense occurs February 10, 2011 Page 1
4 The future repair or replacement expenses that are anticipated over the next 30 years are illustrated in Exhibits 2 and 3. The future expenses are aggregated on an annual basis to determine the recommended reserve funding plan as illustrated in tabular form in Exhibit 4 and in graphical form in Exhibit 5. The recommended reserve funding plan has been compiled using financial information provided by a representative of the property. The information has been deemed reliable and has not been verified. The following table summarizes this information. Summary of Financial Information Projected Year End Reserve Fund Balance (As of ) Current Annual Reserve Fund Contribution $68,561 $7,650 Reserve Fund Interest Rate 2.25% Based on the projected year-end reserve fund balance, the current reserve fund interest rate, and the estimated inflation rate, an iterative procedure was used to determine a recommended reserve funding plan. The intent of the plan is to have adequate funds available for future expenditures required for major repairs or replacements so that the potential need of a loan or special assessment can be avoided, which ultimately preserves the market value of the property. Based on the reserve analysis, it was concluded that the potential need for a loan or special assessment is not anticipated at this time; however an increase in the annual reserve fund contribution is recommended from the $7650 currently being contributed to the amounts shown in Exhibit 4 in order to avoid the potential of a future loan or special assessment. The following table summarizes the recommended annual reserve fund contributions over the next 5 years. Recom mended Annual Reserve Contribution Year Calendar Year Interest = 2.25% Inflation = 3.82% (Summary of Exhibit 4) $58, $59, $59, $60, $60, See Exhibit 4 The status of the current funding plan as it relates to the recommended funding plan is illustrated in Exhibit 6, assuming that the current budgeted amount continues to be contributed to the reserve study. The following chart illustrates the expenses that will be incurred for each of the element categories over the 30-year study period. These expenses are divided into five and ten-year segments to provide a graphical summary that assists the user in identifying the amount of funding that will be required for each category over a period of time, whether it is short-term or long-term. February 10, 2011 Page 2
5 Inflated Capital Expenses over 30 Years Site Elements Exterior Building Elements Interior Building Elements $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 Thousands 1 to 5 Years 6 to 10 Years 11 to 20 Years Years The following chart illustrates the ratio of expenses that will be incurred over the 30-year study period for each of the elements that represent a majority of the future repair or replacement expenses. % of Future Expenses Accumulated Over Life of Study 1.9% 2.3% 1.8% 2.4% 2.0% 14.9% 8.9% 65.8% Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing (65.8%) Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating (8.9%) Wood Rail Fencing (2.3%) Retention Pond Dam Repair (1.8%) Well and Waterfall Pumps (1.9%) Entrance Gate Repair (2.4%) Water Storage Tank Replacement (2.0%) Other (14.9%) The annual contributions made to the reserve fund are a means to compensate for the difference between the ongoing deterioration of a property and its finances. Since elements deteriorate at varying rates and the finances of the property are typically changing on an annual basis, the need to maintain balance between the two is an ongoing process. Therefore, to maintain this balance, periodic updates to the Reserve Study are recommended approximately every three years. Annual updates may be warranted depending on the age of the property and the amount of repair or replacement activity. February 10, 2011 Page 3
6 2.0 INTRODUCTION A Reserve Study was conducted for The Preserve at Sharp Mountain to determine a reasonable level of annual reserve fund contributions required to meet the future expenditures for the elements on the property that will likely require major repairs or replacements over the next 30-year period. The elements that have been included in the Reserve Study are considered common to the property as defined by the Association s declarations and bylaws, unless otherwise noted. The goals of the Reserve Study are as follows: 3.0 GOALS 1. Visually assess the general current condition and obtain the necessary quantities and specifications of the major elements that will likely require repair or replacement over the next 30 years. 2. Estimate the remaining useful life until major repair or replacement of the elements is considered necessary. 3. Estimate the future expense schedule for repair or replacement of the elements. 4. Analyze the annual reserve fund contributions needed to ensure that funds are available for the ongoing repair or replacement of the elements. 5. Provide a status of the current fund as it relates to the recommended funding plan, assuming that the current budgeted amount continues to be contributed to the reserve fund. 4.0 SCOPE OF WORK To accomplish the Reserve Study goals, performed a Level I, Full Reserve Study with site visit in the following two parts. Field Assessment (Part 1) Part 1 of the Reserve Study involved a visual inspection of the property to assess the general condition and obtain the necessary quantities and specifications of the major elements that will likely require repair or replacement over the next 30 years. Reserve Analysis (Part 2) Part 2 involved an analysis of the future repair or replacement expenses anticipated for each of the elements. Based on the general condition, age, and average life expectancy of each element, a longterm repair and replacement schedule was established. has selected a 30-year period for the repair and replacement schedule to capture the long-term cyclic expenses associated with elements that exhibit longer life times. February 10, 2011 Page 4
7 Included in the report are the following exhibits that illustrate the results of the reserve analysis: Exhibit 1: A summary of the element quantities and total present day and inflated expenses incurred over the 30 year period of the study. Exhibit 2: The future repair or replacement expenses as shown in present day dollars that are anticipated over the next 30 years, presented on a year by year basis. Exhibit 3: The future repair or replacement expenses as shown in inflated dollars that are anticipated over the next 30 years, presented on a year by year basis. Exhibit 4: The recommended reserve funding plan as illustrated in tabular form. Exhibit 5: The recommended reserve funding plan as illustrated in graphical form. Exhibit 6: The status of the current funding plan as it relates to the recommended funding plan assuming that the current budgeted amount continues to be contributed to the reserve study. February 10, 2011 Page 5
8 5.0 ASSUMPTIONS Several general assumptions have been made for the completion of this study, which are as follows: 1. The elements will be replaced with like kind unless otherwise noted or directed by a representative of the property to use alternate materials. 2. All new installations will comply with current city, state and local building code requirements. 3. The building structures have a remaining useful life greater than 30 years. 4. A maintenance program will be implemented to ensure that all building components, systems, and equipment are maintained and operated at or near optimum capacities. 5. Since cash flow takes place at frequent and varying time intervals within an interest period, a simplified method of assuming that all cash flow occurs at the midpoint of the interest period is used in the reserve analysis. 6. The reserve analysis was performed using the baseline funding method. By definition, the baseline funding method maintains a reserve fund balance above zero for each year of the study. 7. The study is limited to the elements of the property that likely require major repair or replacement during the study period and that have a significant impact on the reserve contributions. Elements that require minor repairs or replacements and are relatively insignificant in cost when compared to the property in its totality are assumed to be funded from the operating and maintenance budget. 8. The following recurring expenses are considered to be maintenance items; therefore, adequate funding for such expenses should be allocated in the operating and maintenance budget, but not limited to the following: Painting or staining of exterior or interior walls. Applying protective coatings to the wood decks. Crack sealing, seal coating, and striping of asphalt pavement. Routine masonry repair. Expenses associated with maintaining the water quality of the retention pond. 9. Elements such as electrical, water supply, and waste water systems for the buildings are considered to have an extensive lifetime that make it very difficult to predict or establish major repair or replacement expenses. These elements can function indefinitely with ongoing maintenance and repairs which are considered minor when compared to wholesale replacement expenses; therefore, we assume that future minor ongoing maintenance and repair expenses incurred will be funded from the operating and maintenance budget. This assumption is based on the premise that a reserve study is to include elements that have a definable remaining useful life. Therefore, incorporating replacement expenses for elements that do not have a predictable useful life into the study can significantly impact the accuracy and validity of the results. February 10, 2011 Page 6
9 6.0 DISCLOSURES This report is a study to evaluate the adequacy of the HOA s replacement funds and the annual contribution thereto. It is not an engineering study of client-owned elements. The data gathered for this report consisted of on-site field work to inventory the quantity and assess the general condition of HOA owned property, assigning current and future values and likely replacement dates of those components resulting in this financial analysis. This report is based on observations of the visible and apparent conditions of a reasonable representative sampling of the property s elements at the time of inspection. Although due diligence was performed during the inspection phase, makes no representations regarding latent or concealed defects that may exist. The inspection did not constitute any invasive investigations and was not intended to determine whether applicable building components, systems, or equipment are adequate or in compliance with any specific or commonly accepted design requirement, building code, or specification. Such tasks as material testing, engineering analysis, destructive testing, or performance testing of building systems, components, or equipment are not considered as part of the scope of work, nor are they considered by the reserve study industry standard. Judgments in this study are based on estimates of the age and typical useful life of the various elements included in this study. The predictions of useful life and remaining useful life are based on industry and/or statistical comparisons, along with sound engineering judgment. It is necessary to recognize that the actual conditions can alter the useful life of any element. The methods of installation, deferral of maintenance, or other unforeseen conditions make it virtually impossible to predict precisely when each element will require major repair or replacement. The tabulated values for expected useful life and remaining useful life are estimates, as noted, and should not be construed as a guarantee or warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the performance of products, materials, or workmanship. If the property representative has not disclosed any known issues or problems with materials, components, or systems, it is noted that the validity of this study may be impacted. Where applicable, comments regarding the general condition of the property and any significant deficiencies as observed at the time of inspection have been documented. A qualified contractor or building engineer should be retained to repair, replace, or adjust defective components to ensure optimum performance or efficiency. Pricing used for the repair or replacement costs indicated in this report are derived from the R.S. Means Repair and Remodeling Cost Data publication in conjunction with other reliable resources such as individual material and equipment suppliers and sound engineering judgment. The material and labor pricing provided are estimates and have been augmented, as necessary, to account for specific site conditions (i.e. material handling, scaffolding, etc.). The total expenses represent a useful guideline whereby reserve funds can be accumulated for future repairs and replacements. The estimated repair and replacement expenses, unless otherwise noted, do not include allowances for architectural, engineering, or permitting fees. The information provided by a property representative regarding the financial, physical, or historical data is deemed reliable. The reserve study is intended to be a reflection of the information provided and is not for the purpose of performing an audit, quality analysis, forensic analysis, or background check of historical records. By review of the property representative, the elements listed in the Appendix A of this report have been identified as the elements for which the property has long-term responsibility for repair and replacement. The property representative assumes full responsibility for determining that the list of elements is complete. has not reviewed any documents or declarations as part of this Reserve Study and assumes no responsibility for the completeness of the inventory. This report is intended solely for the use of the The Preserve at Sharp Mountain in connection with funding for major repairs and replacements, and may not be used by any other party for any purpose. February 10, 2011 Page 7
10 7.0 FIELD ASSESSMENT (Part 1) The contract to perform a Reserve Study for The Preserve at Sharp Mountain required an on-site, visual inspection of the property and a report on the general condition of the elements. The definitions below summarize the method used to determine the condition of each element included in this study. The colors shown below correspond to the general condition column of each of the following element tables. Condition Definitions Poor a major deficiency of a component in which the function or operation is affected, is at or beyond its typical useful life, or whose remaining useful life should not be relied upon as a result of the information gathered regarding actual or effective age or evidence of abuse, excessive wear and tear, exposure to the elements, lack of proper maintenance, etc. This definition specifically excludes deficiencies that may be remedied with routine maintenance, miscellaneous minor repairs, normal operating maintenance, etc., however it may include components that are governed by aesthetics as opposed to performance. Marginal no major component deficiencies observed or evidence that would suggest that a major deficiency may exist. The component remains functional and operational, as it exists, however there is evidence that it is nearing its typical useful life. Satisfactory no major component deficiencies observed, or evidence that the component is nearing its typical useful life, however it is apparent that the component has not been recently replaced or repaired to its original condition. Good no major component deficiencies observed and it is apparent that the component has been recently replaced or repaired to its original condition. Varies the general condition of an element cannot be generally defined by one of the above mentioned definitions. During the course of our inspection, several general observations were made regarding the construction and maintenance of the property. In general, a diligent effort was made to distribute the repair and replacement expenses over a number of years to create a more uniform expense report. The following discussions relate to the general features of the elements. February 10, 2011 Page 8
11 7.1 ASHPALT PAVEMENT RESURFACING General Description The 12 miles of private roads and amenity center parking lots and drives located throughout the property are constructed of asphalt pavement. Due to the mountainous topography of the subject property, most road surfaces are built on hill cut or fill areas. Asphalt pavement is constructed of two layers of material consisting of an asphalt-wearing course and granular base course. The asphalt-wearing course for streets is typically constructed of two layers consisting of a thin surface course and a thicker binder course, which provides a bond between the surface course and granular base course. The granular base course usually ranges from 6 to 18 in thickness depending on sub-base (i.e. soil) conditions and loading requirements. Compaction of the sub-base (i.e. soil) and granular base course is one of the most important procedures to ensure proper performance of the pavement. Typically, the single most significant cause of asphalt pavement failure is poor drainage. However, due to the hilly nature of the property, incomplete compaction of fill is the likely cause of observed areas of subsidence. Based on the observed conditions and the estimated age and condition of the paving, we have included funding for replacement of portions of the roads and parking areas over the 30-year period of this study as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Periodic seal coating and crack sealing approximately every 5 to 6 years is the most important preventative maintenance that can be done to extend the life of asphalt pavement. Due to the extensive road areas in the property, we are recommending periodic seal coating of only the amenity areas parking and driveways. Seal coating minimizes oils from evaporating, reduces the degradation that occurs from ultraviolet light, and prevents water from penetrating the pavement. Random cracks that are greater than 1/8 in width should be routed out, cleaned, and filled with a rubberized hot tar crack sealant to prevent water from penetrating the pavement. Based on the observed conditions and the estimated age and condition of the coating, we have included funding for replacement over the 30-year period of this study as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing Ongoing 1,268,000 Square Feet $2,029,000 Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating ,500 Square Feet $24,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $2,053,000 February 10, 2011 Page 9
12 February 10, 2011 Page 10
13 7.2 CONCRETE CURBING General Description Concrete curb and gutter is located only around the perimeter of the asphalt paved walkway at the Lodge lawn. It is not expected that a wholesale replacement of the concrete curb and gutter will be required within this study period; however, partial replacements are anticipated periodically because of accelerated deterioration that can occur depending on the concrete mix, finishing techniques, and local conditions. Based on the observed conditions and the estimated age of the curbing, we have provided a repair allowance over the 30-year period of this study as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Concrete Curbing Up to 60 Ongoing 280 Linear Feet $3,400 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $3,400 February 10, 2011 Page 11
14 7.3 WOOD RAIL FENCING General Description The property features wood 3-rail fencing at the main entry road, and split rail fencing located around the Lodge area and other amenity areas. Wood fencing is also present between masonry columns at certain road intersections. Replacement of wood fencing is periodically necessary due to lateral displacement of the vertical support posts, wood rot, termite damage, and mechanical damage to the pickets or rails, etc. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for periodic replacement of the wood fencing as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. The recurring expense of applying a protective coating to the fencing is considered to be a maintenance item; therefore, adequate funding should be allocated to the operating and maintenance budget for such an expense. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Wood Rail Fencing Ongoing 5,200 Linear Feet $81,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $81,000 February 10, 2011 Page 12
15 7.4 SITE LIGHTING General Description The property features lighting located at the entry monuments, lodge, pond and general landscape lighting. Often, the need for replacement is determined by the extent of damage to the lighting such as corrosion, the frequency and costs of repairs due to the age of the lighting, or merely the desire to change the aesthetic appearance of the lighting to maintain the market value of the property. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for periodic partial replacement of the site lighting as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Site Lighting Allow ance $3,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $3,000 February 10, 2011 Page 13
16 7.5 SITE FURNISHINGS General Description Clustered around the amenity areas is a variety of furnishings, such as trail benches, wood picnic tables, wood trash receptacles, wood swing set and six heavy custom picnic tables and benches at the Lodge. Replacement of such furnishings is often considered necessary as a result of weather deterioration, physical damage, a loss of finish, the fixtures becoming worn or outdated, and to maintain the aesthetics of the property. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for an allowance for periodic replacement as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Site Furnishings Allow ance $5,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $5,000 February 10, 2011 Page 14
17 7.6 RETENTION POND General Description This property features a wet retention pond located at the main, eastern entry of the property. To insure proper function, these holding ponds should generally be kept clear of tree and vegetation growth. Any accumulated debris can block the overflow pipe in times of heavy precipitation, which in turn can allow pond water to overtop the dam, which for the subject property is the entry road. Allowing vegetation other than grass, particularly roots of trees and shrubs to grow on dams can weaken it. In the worst case scenario, dam erosion or collapse of the dam can occur, threatening property and life below the dam. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for the periodic clearing of the pond and dam as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Located in the Nesting Waters Park lake is a floating water pump and fountain assembly. For the purpose of this study, we have assumed the pump is rated at 2 horsepower. Pumps eventually fail due to constant wear and tear from operation, bearing and impeller failure and electrical problems which necessitates replacement. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for replacement of the fountain and pump as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Retention Pond Dam Repair Allow ance $3,000 Retention Pond Aerator Each $5,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $8,000 February 10, 2011 Page 15
18 7.7 WELLS AND WATERFALL PUMPS General Description The property features five wells, located at Nesting Waters, Lodge, Enterkin Park and one each at the two fire water holding tanks, and one for the Lodge waterfall pump. For the purpose of this study, we have assumed the pumps are each rated at 2 horsepower. Pumps eventually fail due to constant wear and tear from operation, bearing and impeller failure and electrical problems which necessitates replacement. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for replacement of the fountain and pump as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Well and Waterfall Pumps Each $10,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $10,000 February 10, 2011 Page 16
19 7.8 MASONRY TUCKPOINTING General Description Located at the main and west entrances to the property are stone veneer monument planter walls and columns. Stone veneer columns are also present at the entry gates, at certain road intersections, park sign marker columns and walls. The Lodge column bases are stone veneer. The Lodge features a large stone fireplace. Tuckpointing of masonry is periodically necessary to prevent costly and extensive damage such as deterioration of mortar joints, cracking and spalling of brick, etc., that is caused by moisture penetration. Some loose stones in random areas were noted. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for maintenance tuckpointing of the masonry as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Masonry Tuckpointing Allow ance $3,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $3,000 February 10, 2011 Page 17
20 7.9 GAZEBOS General Description Gazebos are located at Nesting Waters Park and Enterkin Park. They are constructed of wood posts and open roof structure. Roofing materials have been included in Section Wood structures are subject to weather and termite damage as well as normal wear and tear from usage. Funding has been allocated for partial major repairs of the gazebos as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Gazebo Repairs Allow ance $5,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $5,000 February 10, 2011 Page 18
21 7.10 LODGE General Description The main amenity area features an open-sided wood structure Lodge constructed of heavy cypress wood posts and open roof structure. Wood structures are subject to weather and termite damage as well as normal wear and tear from usage. Electrical system repairs are included in this allocation. Funding has been allocated for partial major repairs of the Lodge as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Lodge Repairs Allow ance $5,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $5,000 February 10, 2011 Page 19
22 7.11 SIGNAGE General Description Located at the main and west entrances to the property are wood monument signs. An additional monument sign is located off-site at the intersection of Pettit Road and Salem Church Road. Over time wood signage of this type can become warped, damaged, or experience deterioration that necessitates replacement. Located throughout the property are street stop signs and name signs, a few miscellaneous directional/advisory signs at random areas, and recreation area signs. Replacement of the signs is often considered necessary as a result of physical damage, a loss of finish, the structures becoming worn or outdated, and to maintain the aesthetics of the property. Several signs were observed to be damaged. For the purpose of this study we have provided an allowance for periodic partial replacement. Based on the observed conditions, maintenance funding has been allocated for periodic replacement of the signs as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Monument Signage Each $4,500 Signage Replacement Each $22,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $26,500 February 10, 2011 Page 20
23 7.12 ENTRANCE GATE General Description Located at the two vehicle entries are double-width wrought iron motorized gates. The system features two resident bar code readers, two guest phone pad call boxes and two road exit sensors. The gates themselves should last indefinitely if properly maintained. However, minor or significant repairs may be necessary due to damage or lack of maintenance. Motor operators eventually fail due to constant use. Electronics can fail due to use and weather. Based on the observed conditions, an allowance has been allocated for repair of the various systems as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Entrance Gate Repair Allow ance $10,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $10,000 February 10, 2011 Page 21
24 7.13 LANDSCAPING General Description Landscaping for which the HOA is responsible is located at the main entries and at the amenity centers. It is very difficult to predict the expenses associated with the replacement of plant material. The day-to-day care of the plants will have a significant impact on how each will endure throughout this study period. Lifelimiting factors include cultural problems, insects, disease and physical damage. The property also has extensive irrigation piping and features that has an indeterminate life cycle. Irrigation pumps have been addressed in Section 7.7. The client has requested that an allowance be included in this study to insure that funding is set aside for needed replacements as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Landscaping Improvement Allow ance $3,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $3,000 February 10, 2011 Page 22
25 7.14 WATER STORAGE TANKS General Description Due to the remoteness of this rural area, the property features two buried 5,000 gallon water tanks reported by the HOA as fiberglass, the purpose of which is to supply water for the fire department for structure or brush fires. Well pumps keep the tanks filled (see Section 7.7). The tanks may have a life beyond the 30 years of this study. However, due to their critical importance, an allowance has been allocated for possible replacement as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2 Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Water Storage Tank Replacement Each $16,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $16,000 February 10, 2011 Page 23
26 7.15 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEMENTS General Description The roofs of the Lodge, restroom and storage buildings, and two gazebos are covered with a single layer of a laminated architectural asphalt shingle. Replacement of the roofing is eventually necessary due to chronic problems with moisture penetration and the degradation of shingles as evident by curling, torn shingle tabs, excessive granule loss, etc. For the purpose of this analysis, we assume that the roof covering will be torn off and replaced with a similar shingle style, rather than recovered. Recovering a roof is not the preferred method due to the reduced useful life of the new roof that is caused by the underlying shingle layers absorbing additional heat causing accelerated degradation. A recover also restricts the repair of delaminated or decayed roof sheathing and flashing deficiencies. The flashing and felt paper are integral with the entire roof system. Therefore, they are considered as part of the overall roof replacement. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for wholesale replacement of the roofing as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. The restroom and storage building facades are constructed with cypress lap siding per the HOA. Included in this category are the double doors for the storage building and the faux shutters on both buildings. Cypress has an unusually long life expectancy. However, replacement eventually becomes necessary due to deterioration (warping, decay, splitting, etc.) of the wood. However, with proper maintenance such as applying protective coatings the siding should last indefinitely. Based on the observed conditions, and allowance has been allocated for partial replacement of the siding during this 30-year study period as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. The recurring expense of staining the siding is considered to be a maintenance item; therefore, adequate funding should be allocated in the operating and maintenance budget for such an expense. The property features several wood decks and footbridges. Replacement of the wood features becomes necessary as a result of deterioration (wood rot, splitting, termites, etc.) and to maintain the aesthetic appearance of the property. However, periodic minor replacements may become necessary. For the purpose of this study, funding has been allocated for a regular replacement schedule for the wood structures over the duration of the study period as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. The recurring expense of staining the decks is considered to be a maintenance item; therefore, adequate funding should be allocated in the operating and maintenance budget for such an expense. The two restroom building doors are insulated steel with keypad locks. Due to the exposed exterior location, over time the doors can be expected to deteriorate with the exposure to weather. Heavy use of the restroom doors often results in accelerated wear and tear. For replacement of the doors, funding has been allocated for a regular replacement schedule over the duration of the study period as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Roofing ,400 Square Feet $7,000 Wood Siding Ongoing 850 Square Feet $5,000 Wood Decks and Stairs Ongoin 1,500 Square Feet $23,000 Lodge Restroom Doors Each $2,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $37,000 February 10, 2011 Page 24
27 February 10, 2011 Page 25
28 7.16 INTERIOR BUILDING ELEMENTS General Description While the Lodge is open-sided, it does feature lighting and ceilings fans. The restroom building features exterior and interior lighting as well. Often, the need for lighting replacement is determined by the extent of damage to the lighting such as corrosion or broken lenses, the frequency and costs of repairs due to the age of the lighting, or the desire to change the aesthetic appearance of the lighting to maintain the market value of the property. Based on the observed conditions, funding has been allocated for wholesale replacement of the lighting fixtures as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. The restroom building features tile on the floor and fixture walls, 2 toilets, 2 wall sinks, plywood paneling, miscellaneous fixtures and basic electrical wiring and plumbing. Due to heavy physical use, periodic refurbishing is needed to maintain aesthetics. Costs of routine maintenance and minor replacements are commonly expensed to operating funds. However, an overall allowance has been provided in this study for more significant renovations or upgrades as deemed necessary or desired for aesthetic changes. Based on the observed conditions, funding for replacement of these elements is provided as illustrated in the chart below and Exhibit 2. Deficiencies Noted See photograph section of this report for any observed deficiencies. Element Condition Key Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Varies Element / Sub Element General Condition Typical Remaining Lighting and Fan Replacement Allow ance $3,000 Lodge Restroom Refurbishing Allow ance $5,000 Total Quantities Units Present Day Expense Total $8,000 February 10, 2011 Page 26
29 8.0 RESERVE ANALYSIS (Part 2) Repair and Replacement Expenses At the time of inspection, the necessary quantities of the major elements that will likely require repair or replacement over the next 30 years were determined. The repair or replacement quantities for each element are compiled and presented in Exhibit 1. Also, information was gathered regarding the material, component, or system specifications of each of the elements. These specifications were matched with the specifications in the national cost data source and a present-day expense for materials, labor, overhead and profit for each element was established. The sources used provide costs based on the unit price for each element. The total present-day expenses are the product of multiplying the total units by the unit expenses as indicated in Exhibit 1. Having determined the present-day expenses for repairing or replacing each of the elements, the future costs were evaluated. The future costs are based on the fact that commercial and residential construction costs have historically increased with time and can be expected to increase in the future. To determine the future repair or replacement expenses over the next 30-year period, the present day expenses have been inflated at an annual rate of 3.82%. The inflation rate was determined using the average of the last 20 years of the RS Means Historical Cost Indexes for Atlanta, Georgia. Given the present day expense, the future expense is calculated using the future value of a single amount formula as follows: where F = P (1 + IR) n F = future expense P = present day expense IR = inflation rate expressed as a decimal n = number of years until future expense occurs The future repair or replacement expenses for each of the elements were calculated from the present day expenses accounting for the year in which the element is to be repaired or replaced. This information is provided in Exhibits 2 and 3 and is listed by each element and each year of the analysis. The sum of the expenditures for all of the elements in any given year equals the total expenditures for that year. This value is the basis for determining the future reserve requirements for each year of the analysis. In other words, the reserve funds that must be on hand in any given year are equal to the total expenses projected for that year. Recommended Reserve Funding Plan For each year that future expenses are incurred, there is an annual levelized series of contributions that can be placed in an interest bearing account that will ensure that the future reserves are available when needed. These annual contributions represent the recommended contribution to the reserve fund to meet the future reserve needs. Exhibit 4 presents a compilation of the reserve fund balance, contributions, and expenses for each year of the analysis that satisfy the future reserve funding plan based on the current reserve fund interest rate and inflation rate. February 10, 2011 Page 27
30 It is emphasized that the recommended reserve funding plan presented in Exhibit 4 is only one of many possible schedules that can be employed to meet the future reserve requirements. Exhibit 5 is a graphical representation of the information in Exhibit 4. This illustrates how the leveled reserve fund contributions are utilized to meet the annual expenses, and how the reserves build over time. The status of the current funding plan as it relates to the recommended funding plan is illustrated in Exhibit 6, assuming that the current budgeted amount continues to be contributed to the reserve study. 9.0 LONG TERM REVIEW The annual contributions made to the reserve fund are a means to compensate for the difference between the ongoing deterioration of a property and its finances. Since elements deteriorate at varying rates and the finances are typically changing on an annual basis, the need to maintain balance between the two is an ongoing process. In order to maintain this balance, it may be appropriate to have the reserve study updated. When considering an update to a study, the following questions should be considered: Has there been a significant departure (i.e. 2% to 3%) from the anticipated rates for interest, inflation, and construction cost increases previously assumed? Have any major elements been added or replaced since the previous study? Have any elements sustained premature deterioration due to unseasonable weather or lack of maintenance since the previous study? Have any repairs or replacements been accelerated or deferred from the estimated schedule previously generated? If the answer is yes to one or more of the above questions, then an update to the reserves study should be strongly considered. Generally, a property that is relatively new in age and is not undergoing any major repairs or replacements should have the reserve study updated approximately every 3 years to maintain the validity of the estimates. However, if the property is older and is experiencing major repairs or replacements, then the study should be updated on an annual basis. An update to a previous reserve study can typically be performed for a percentage of the original cost of the study. The re-evaluation can include a field walk down of the property, or simply an update to the tables. February 10, 2011 Page 28
31 Recent road patches observed Large road section repair near west entry Center joint separation noted, random areas Settled areas noted February 10, 2011 Page 1
32 Downhill slippage noted, newer sections Settlement noted, likely due to improper sub-base compaction View of curb at Lodge lawn. Note asphalt path. View of 3-rail fence along main entry February 10, 2011 Page 2
33 Fence and stone columns at road intersections 2-rail split rail fence, typical Landscape lighting, typical Examples of site furnishings February 10, 2011 Page 3
34 Examples of site furnishings Nesting Waters Park fountain and gazebo Example of wellhead Examples of masonry throughout property. Some spalling stones noted at main entry planter. February 10, 2011 Page 4
35 Masonry column bases at Lodge Crack in Lodge fireplace firebrick noted Nesting Waters gazebo Enterkin Park gazebo February 10, 2011 Page 5
36 View of Lodge exterior. Note roofing. View of Lodge roof structure. Note fans. Example of property signage. Note deterioration. Example of property signage. Note deterioration February 10, 2011 Page 6
37 Main entry gate West gate. Note operators, typical. Resident bar code reader Guest call box February 10, 2011 Page 7
38 Emergency (buried) water tank locations View of restroom building. Note roofing, siding. View of storage building. Note roofing, siding. Examples of wood footbridges and decks February 10, 2011 Page 8
39 Restroom door, 1 of 2 Restroom interior, typical, Example of street/stop signage, typical February 10, 2011 Page 9
40 Report Section # Quantities Element Total Units Present Day Unit Expenses Exhibit 1 Element Expense Summary The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Total Present Day Expenses Expenses Present Day Expenses for 30 Year Period Inflated Expenses for 30 Year Period % of Total Inflated Expense s For 30 Year Period Life Analysis (years) Site Elements 7.1 Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing ####### Square Feet $1.60 $2,029,000 $649,280 $1,382, % Ongoing Varies 7.1 Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating 34,500 Square Feet $0.70 $24,000 $96,000 $183, % Marginal 7.2 Concrete Curbing 280 Linear Feet $12.14 $3,400 $1,360 $4, % Up to 60 Ongoing Satisfactory 7.3 Wood Rail Fencing 5,200 Linear Feet $15.58 $81,000 $24,300 $47, % Ongoing Satisfactory 7.4 Site Lighting 1 Allowance $3, $3,000 $9,000 $16, % Satisfactory 7.5 Site Furnishings 1 Allowance $5, $5,000 $15,000 $32, % Satisfactory 7.6 Retention Pond Dam Repair 1 Allowance $3, $3,000 $18,000 $38, % Satisfactory 7.6 Retention Pond Aerator 1 Each $5, $5,000 $10,000 $19, % Satisfactory 7.7 Well and Waterfall Pumps 6 Each $1, $10,000 $20,000 $39, % Satisfactory 7.8 Masonry Tuckpointing 1 Allowance $3, $3,000 $9,000 $15, % Satisfactory 7.9 Gazebo Repairs 1 Allowance $5, $5,000 $15,000 $29, % Satisfactory 7.10 Lodge Repairs 1 Allowance $5, $5,000 $15,000 $36, % Satisfactory 7.11 Monument Signage 3 Each $1, $4,500 $9,000 $17, % Satisfactory 7.11 Signage Replacement 55 Each $ $22,000 $13,200 $25, % Marginal 7.12 Entrance Gate Repair 1 Allowance $10, $10,000 $20,000 $52, % Satisfactory 7.13 Landscaping Improvement 1 Allowance $3, $3,000 $9,000 $22, % Satisfactory 7.14 Water Storage Tank Replacement 2 Each $8, $16,000 $16,000 $42, % Satisfactory Typical Useful Life Remaining General Current Condition Exterior Building Elements 7.15 Roofing 2,400 Square Feet $2.92 $7,000 $7,000 $11, % Satisfactory 7.15 Wood Siding 850 Square Feet $5.88 $5,000 $1,500 $3, % Ongoing Satisfactory 7.15 Wood Decks and Stairs 1,500 Square Feet $15.33 $23,000 $13,800 $27, % Ongoin Satisfactory 7.15 Lodge Restroom Doors 2 Each $1, $2,000 $2,000 $4, % Satisfactory Interior Building Elements 7.16 Lighting and Fan Replacement 1 Allowance $3, $3,000 $9,000 $16, % Satisfactory 7.16 Lodge Restroom Refurbishing 1 Allowance $5, $5,000 $15,000 $27, % Satisfactory Printed by on 07-Jun-11 Totals $2,276,900 $997,440 $2,098, %
41 Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6 Present Day Annual Expense Summary (Years 1 thru 5) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 1 thru 5 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing $40,580 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $40, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating $24,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $24, % Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing #N/A #N/A #N/A $8,100 #N/A $8, % Site Lighting #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Site Furnishings Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A $3, % Retention Pond Aerator Well and Waterfall Pumps Masonry Tuckpointing $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Gazebo Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,000 #N/A $5, % Lodge Repairs Monument Signage Signage Replacement $2,200 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements Roofing Wood Siding Wood Decks and Stairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $4,600 #N/A $4, % Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements Lighting and Fan Replacement #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing #N/A $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Present Day Expense Totals $69,780 $11,000 $3,000 $17,700 $101, % Inflation Rate (1+IR) n Inflated Expense Totals (From Exhibit 3) $72,920 $12,012 $3,423 $21,108 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $109, %
42 Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 6 Present Day Annual Expense Summary (Years 6 thru 10) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 6 thru 10 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing #N/A #N/A #N/A $202,900 #N/A $202, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating #N/A #N/A #N/A $24,000 #N/A $24, % Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing Site Lighting Site Furnishings $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A $3, % Retention Pond Aerator #N/A $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Well and Waterfall Pumps #N/A $10,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $10, % Masonry Tuckpointing Gazebo Repairs Lodge Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,000 #N/A $5, % Monument Signage #N/A $4,500 #N/A #N/A #N/A $4, % Signage Replacement $2,200 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Entrance Gate Repair #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $10,000 $10, % Landscaping Improvement #N/A #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A $3, % Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements Roofing Wood Siding #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $500 $ % Wood Decks and Stairs Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements Lighting and Fan Replacement Lodge Restroom Refurbishing Present Day Expense Totals $7,200 $19,500 $3,000 $234,900 $10,500 $275, % Inflation Rate (1+IR) n Inflated Expense Totals (From Exhibit 3) $9,376 $26,537 $4,266 $349,083 $16,306 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $405, %
43 Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 6 Present Day Annual Expense Summary (Years 11 thru 15) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 11 thru 15 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing #N/A #N/A #N/A $8,100 #N/A $8, % Site Lighting #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Site Furnishings Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A $3, % Retention Pond Aerator Well and Waterfall Pumps Masonry Tuckpointing $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Gazebo Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,000 #N/A $5, % Lodge Repairs Monument Signage Signage Replacement $2,200 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements Roofing #N/A $7,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $7, % Wood Siding Wood Decks and Stairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $4,600 #N/A $4, % Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements Lighting and Fan Replacement #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing #N/A $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Present Day Expense Totals $5,200 $18,000 $3,000 $17,700 $43, % Inflation Rate (1+IR) n Inflated Expense Totals (From Exhibit 3) $8,439 $30,526 $5,317 $32,780 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $77, %
44 Exhibit 2 Page 4 of 6 Present Day Annual Expense Summary (Years 16 thru 20) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 16 thru 20 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing #N/A $202,900 #N/A #N/A #N/A $202, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating #N/A $24,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $24, % Concrete Curbing #N/A #N/A #N/A $680 #N/A $ % Wood Rail Fencing Site Lighting Site Furnishings $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A $3, % Retention Pond Aerator Well and Waterfall Pumps Masonry Tuckpointing Gazebo Repairs Lodge Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,000 #N/A $5, % Monument Signage Signage Replacement $2,200 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement #N/A #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A $3, % Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements Roofing Wood Siding #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $500 $ % Wood Decks and Stairs Lodge Restroom Doors #N/A $2,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Interior Building Elements Lighting and Fan Replacement Lodge Restroom Refurbishing Present Day Expense Totals $7,200 $228,900 $3,000 $8,680 $500 $248, % Inflation Rate (1+IR) n Inflated Expense Totals (From Exhibit 3) $14,561 $483,752 $6,625 $20,032 $1,206 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $526, %
45 Exhibit 2 Page 5 of 6 Present Day Annual Expense Summary (Years 21 thru 25) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 21 thru 25 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $202,900 $202, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $24,000 $24, % Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing #N/A #N/A #N/A $8,100 #N/A $8, % Site Lighting #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Site Furnishings Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A $3, % Retention Pond Aerator #N/A $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Well and Waterfall Pumps #N/A $10,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $10, % Masonry Tuckpointing $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Gazebo Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,000 #N/A $5, % Lodge Repairs Monument Signage #N/A $4,500 #N/A #N/A #N/A $4, % Signage Replacement $2,200 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement Water Storage Tank Replacement #N/A $16,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $16, % Exterior Building Elements Roofing Wood Siding Wood Decks and Stairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $4,600 #N/A $4, % Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements Lighting and Fan Replacement #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing #N/A $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Present Day Expense Totals $5,200 $46,500 $3,000 $17,700 $226,900 $299, % Inflation Rate (1+IR) n Inflated Expense Totals (From Exhibit 3) $13,106 $122,464 $8,256 $50,906 $681,933 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $876, %
46 Element Exhibit 2 Page 6 of 6 Present Day Annual Expense Summary (Years 26 thru 30) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 26 thru 30 % of Totals Totals Years 1 thru 30 % of Totals Totals Site Elements Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing $649, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating $96, % Concrete Curbing #N/A #N/A #N/A $680 #N/A $ % $1, % Wood Rail Fencing $24, % Site Lighting $9, % Site Furnishings $5,000 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % $15, % Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A #N/A $3, % $18, % Retention Pond Aerator $10, % Well and Waterfall Pumps $20, % Masonry Tuckpointing $9, % Gazebo Repairs $15, % Lodge Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,000 #N/A $5, % $15, % Monument Signage $9, % Signage Replacement $2,200 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % $13, % Entrance Gate Repair #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $10,000 $10, % $20, % Landscaping Improvement #N/A #N/A #N/A $3,000 #N/A $3, % $9, % Water Storage Tank Replacement $16, % Exterior Building Elements Roofing $7, % Wood Siding #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $500 $ % $1, % Wood Decks and Stairs $13, % Lodge Restroom Doors $2, % Interior Building Elements Lighting and Fan Replacement $9, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing $15, % Present Day Expense Totals $7,200 $3,000 $8,680 $10,500 $29, % $997, % Inflation Rate (1+IR) n Inflated Expense Totals (From Exhibit 3) $22,612 $10,289 $31,109 $39,326 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $103, % $2,098, %
47 Exhibit 3 Page 1 of 6 Inflated Annual Expense Summary (Years 1 thru 5) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 1 thru 5 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements $1 Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing $42,406 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $42, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating $25,080 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $25, % Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing #N/A #N/A #N/A $9,659 #N/A $9, % Site Lighting #N/A $3,276 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Site Furnishings Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $3,423 #N/A #N/A $3, % Retention Pond Aerator Well and Waterfall Pumps Masonry Tuckpointing $3,135 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Gazebo Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,963 #N/A $5, % Lodge Repairs Monument Signage Signage Replacement $2,299 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements $1 Roofing Wood Siding Wood Decks and Stairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $5,486 #N/A $5, % Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements $1 Lighting and Fan Replacement #N/A $3,276 #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing #N/A $5,460 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % 1 Inflated Expense Totals $72,920 $12,012 $3,423 $21,108 $109, % Inflation Rate Reciprocal (1/(1+IR) n ) Present Day Expense Totals (From Exhibit 2) $69,780 $11,000 $3,000 $17,700 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $101, %
48 Exhibit 3 Page 2 of 6 Inflated Annual Expense Summary (Years 6 thru 10) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: Years 6 thru 10 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements $1 Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing #N/A #N/A #N/A $301,529 #N/A $301, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating #N/A #N/A #N/A $35,666 #N/A $35, % Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing Site Lighting Site Furnishings $6,511 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $6, % Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $4,266 #N/A #N/A $4, % Retention Pond Aerator #N/A $6,804 #N/A #N/A #N/A $6, % Well and Waterfall Pumps #N/A $13,609 #N/A #N/A #N/A $13, % Masonry Tuckpointing Gazebo Repairs Lodge Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $7,430 #N/A $7, % Monument Signage #N/A $6,124 #N/A #N/A #N/A $6, % Signage Replacement $2,865 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $2, % Entrance Gate Repair #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $15,530 $15, % Landscaping Improvement #N/A #N/A #N/A $4,458 #N/A $4, % Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements $1 Roofing Wood Siding #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $776 $ % Wood Decks and Stairs Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements $1 Lighting and Fan Replacement Lodge Restroom Refurbishing 1 Inflated Expense Totals $9,376 $26,537 $4,266 $349,083 $16,306 $405, % Inflation Rate Reciprocal (1/(1+IR) n ) Present Day Expense Totals (From Exhibit 2) $7,200 $19,500 $3,000 $234,900 $10,500 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $275, %
49 Exhibit 3 Inflated Annual Expense Summary (Years 11 thru 15) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Page 3 of Years 11 thru 15 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements $1 Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing #N/A #N/A #N/A $15,001 #N/A $15, % Site Lighting #N/A $5,088 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Site Furnishings Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $5,317 #N/A #N/A $5, % Retention Pond Aerator Well and Waterfall Pumps Masonry Tuckpointing $4,869 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $4, % Gazebo Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $9,260 #N/A $9, % Lodge Repairs Monument Signage Signage Replacement $3,570 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $3, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements $1 Roofing #N/A $11,871 #N/A #N/A #N/A $11, % Wood Siding Wood Decks and Stairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $8,519 #N/A $8, % Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements $1 Lighting and Fan Replacement #N/A $5,088 #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing #N/A $8,479 #N/A #N/A #N/A $8, % 1 Inflated Expense Totals $8,439 $30,526 $5,317 $32,780 $77, % Inflation Rate Reciprocal (1/(1+IR) n ) Present Day Expense Totals (From Exhibit 2) $5,200 $18,000 $3,000 $17,700 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $43, %
50 Exhibit 3 Inflated Annual Expense Summary (Years 16 thru 20) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Page 4 of Years 16 thru 20 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements $1 Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing #N/A $428,804 #N/A #N/A #N/A $428, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating #N/A $50,721 #N/A #N/A #N/A $50, % Concrete Curbing #N/A #N/A #N/A $1,569 #N/A $1, % Wood Rail Fencing Site Lighting Site Furnishings $10,112 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $10, % Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $6,625 #N/A #N/A $6, % Retention Pond Aerator Well and Waterfall Pumps Masonry Tuckpointing Gazebo Repairs Lodge Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $11,539 #N/A $11, % Monument Signage Signage Replacement $4,449 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $4, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement #N/A #N/A #N/A $6,924 #N/A $6, % Water Storage Tank Replacement Exterior Building Elements $1 Roofing Wood Siding #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $1,206 $1, % Wood Decks and Stairs Lodge Restroom Doors #N/A $4,227 #N/A #N/A #N/A $4, % Interior Building Elements $1 Lighting and Fan Replacement Lodge Restroom Refurbishing 1 Inflated Expense Totals $14,561 $483,752 $6,625 $20,032 $1,206 $526, % Inflation Rate Reciprocal (1/(1+IR) n ) Present Day Expense Totals (From Exhibit 2) $7,200 $228,900 $3,000 $8,680 $500 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $248, %
51 Exhibit 3 Inflated Annual Expense Summary (Years 21 thru 25) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Page 5 of Years 21 thru 25 Element % of Totals Totals Site Elements $1 Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $609,803 $609, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $72,130 $72, % Concrete Curbing Wood Rail Fencing #N/A #N/A #N/A $23,296 #N/A $23, % Site Lighting #N/A $7,901 #N/A #N/A #N/A $7, % Site Furnishings Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $8,256 #N/A #N/A $8, % Retention Pond Aerator #N/A $13,168 #N/A #N/A #N/A $13, % Well and Waterfall Pumps #N/A $26,337 #N/A #N/A #N/A $26, % Masonry Tuckpointing $7,561 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $7, % Gazebo Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $14,380 #N/A $14, % Lodge Repairs Monument Signage #N/A $11,851 #N/A #N/A #N/A $11, % Signage Replacement $5,545 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $5, % Entrance Gate Repair Landscaping Improvement Water Storage Tank Replacement #N/A $42,138 #N/A #N/A #N/A $42, % Exterior Building Elements $1 Roofing Wood Siding Wood Decks and Stairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $13,230 #N/A $13, % Lodge Restroom Doors Interior Building Elements $1 Lighting and Fan Replacement #N/A $7,901 #N/A #N/A #N/A $7, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing #N/A $13,168 #N/A #N/A #N/A $13, % 1 Inflated Expense Totals $13,106 $122,464 $8,256 $50,906 $681,933 $876, % Inflation Rate Reciprocal (1/(1+IR) n ) Present Day Expense Totals (From Exhibit 2) $5,200 $46,500 $3,000 $17,700 $226,900 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $299, %
52 Exhibit 3 Inflated Annual Expense Summary (Years 26 thru 30) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Page 6 of Years 26 thru 30 Years 1 thru 30 Element % of % of Totals Totals Totals Totals Site Elements $1 Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing $1,382, % Asphalt Parking and Path Seal Coating $183, % Concrete Curbing #N/A #N/A #N/A $2,437 #N/A $2, % $4, % Wood Rail Fencing $47, % Site Lighting $16, % Site Furnishings $15,703 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $15, % $32, % Retention Pond Dam Repair #N/A #N/A $10,289 #N/A #N/A $10, % $38, % Retention Pond Aerator $19, % Well and Waterfall Pumps $39, % Masonry Tuckpointing $15, % Gazebo Repairs $29, % Lodge Repairs #N/A #N/A #N/A $17,920 #N/A $17, % $36, % Monument Signage $17, % Signage Replacement $6,909 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $6, % $25, % Entrance Gate Repair #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $37,453 $37, % $52, % Landscaping Improvement #N/A #N/A #N/A $10,752 #N/A $10, % $22, % Water Storage Tank Replacement $42, % Exterior Building Elements $1 Roofing $11, % Wood Siding #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A $1,873 $1, % $3, % Wood Decks and Stairs $27, % Lodge Restroom Doors $4, % Interior Building Elements $1 Lighting and Fan Replacement $16, % Lodge Restroom Refurbishing $27, % 1 Inflated Expense Totals $22,612 $10,289 $31,109 $39,326 $103, % $2,098, % Inflation Rate Reciprocal (1/(1+IR) n ) Present Day Expense Totals (From Exhibit 2) $7,200 $3,000 $8,680 $10,500 Printed by on 07-Jun-11 $29, % $997, %
53 Exhibit 4 Recommended Reserve Funding Plan (2.25% Interest and 3.82% Inflation) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Beginning Annual Ending Annual Calendar Balance of Reserve Annual Annual Balance of Year Reserve Fund Year Reserve Fund Expenses Interest Reserve Contribution Fund Increase Fund $68, $68,561 $58, % $72,442 $1,387 $56, $56,086 $59,166 1% $11,855 $1,794 $105, $105,191 $59,757 1% $3,357 $3,001 $164, $164,592 $60,355 1% $20,560 $4,151 $208, $208,538 $60,959 1% $0 $5,378 $274, $274,875 $61,568 1% $9,013 $6,776 $334, $334,206 $62,184 1% $25,342 $7,934 $378, $378,982 $62,806 1% $4,048 $9,188 $446, $446,928 $63,434 1% $329,020 $7,068 $188, $188,410 $64,068 1% $15,268 $4,788 $241, $241,998 $64,709 1% $7,850 $6,085 $304, $304,942 $65,356 1% $28,210 $7,279 $349, $349,367 $66,009 1% $4,881 $8,548 $419, $419,043 $66,670 1% $29,896 $9,842 $465, $465,659 $67,336 1% $0 $11,235 $544, $544,230 $68,010 1% $13,107 $12,863 $611, $611,996 $68,690 1% $432,582 $9,676 $257, $257,780 $69,377 1% $5,886 $6,514 $327, $327,785 $70,070 1% $17,679 $7,965 $388, $388,141 $70,771 1% $1,057 $9,517 $467, $467,372 $71,479 1% $11,414 $11,192 $538, $538,629 $72,194 1% $105,968 $11,739 $516, $516,594 $72,915 1% $7,097 $12,364 $594, $594,776 $73,645 1% $43,472 $13,722 $638, $638,671 $74,381 1% $578,545 $8,698 $143, $143,205 $75,125 1% $19,059 $3,853 $203, $203,124 $75,876 1% $0 $5,424 $284, $284,424 $76,635 1% $8,559 $7,165 $359, $359,665 $77,401 1% $25,708 $8,674 $420, $420,032 $78,175 1% $32,284 $9,967 $475,890 Totals $2,037,699 $1,864,159 $233,787 Projected Reserve Fund Balance of $68,561 as of December 31, Printed by on 07-Jun-11
54 Exhibit 4 A Recommended Reserve Funding Plan (1.50% Interest and 2.50% Inflation) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Beginning Annual Ending Annual Calendar Balance of Reserve Annual Annual Balance of Year Reserve Fund Year Reserve Fund Expenses Interest Reserve Contribution Fund Increase Fund $68, $68,561 $48, % $71,525 $856 $46, $46,372 $48,965 1% $11,557 $976 $84, $84,756 $49,454 1% $3,231 $1,618 $132, $132,597 $49,949 1% $19,538 $2,217 $165, $165,225 $50,448 1% $0 $2,857 $218, $218,530 $50,953 1% $8,349 $3,597 $264, $264,731 $51,462 1% $23,179 $4,183 $297, $297,197 $51,977 1% $3,655 $4,820 $350, $350,339 $52,497 1% $289,611 $3,477 $116, $116,702 $53,022 1% $13,441 $2,047 $158, $158,330 $53,552 1% $6,823 $2,725 $207, $207,784 $54,088 1% $24,208 $3,341 $241, $241,005 $54,628 1% $4,136 $3,994 $295, $295,491 $55,175 1% $25,010 $4,659 $330, $330,315 $55,727 1% $0 $5,373 $391, $391,415 $56,284 1% $10,689 $6,213 $443, $443,223 $56,847 1% $348,298 $4,462 $156, $156,234 $57,415 1% $4,679 $2,739 $211, $211,709 $57,989 1% $9,080 $3,542 $264, $264,160 $58,569 1% $819 $4,396 $326, $326,306 $59,155 1% $8,734 $5,273 $382, $382,000 $59,746 1% $80,054 $5,578 $367, $367,270 $60,344 1% $5,294 $5,922 $428, $428,242 $60,947 1% $32,015 $6,641 $463, $463,815 $61,557 1% $420,660 $4,264 $108, $108,976 $62,172 1% $13,682 $1,998 $159, $159,464 $62,794 1% $0 $2,863 $225, $225,121 $63,422 1% $5,989 $3,808 $286, $286,362 $64,056 1% $11,624 $4,689 $343, $343,483 $64,697 1% $22,025 $5,472 $391,627 Totals $1,686,372 $1,477,905 $114,600 Projected Reserve Fund Balance of $68,561 as of December 31, Printed by on 07-Jun-11
55 Exhibit 4 B Recommended Reserve Funding Plan (3.50% Interest and 4.50% Inflation) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Version #: 1.0 Beginning Annual Ending Annual Calendar Balance of Reserve Annual Annual Balance of Year Reserve Fund Year Reserve Fund Expenses Interest Reserve Contribution Fund Increase Fund $68, $68,561 $60, % $72,920 $2,175 $57, $57,911 $60,696 1% $12,012 $2,879 $109, $109,474 $61,303 1% $3,423 $4,844 $172, $172,198 $61,916 1% $21,108 $6,741 $219, $219,747 $62,535 1% $0 $8,786 $291, $291,068 $63,160 1% $9,376 $11,129 $355, $355,981 $63,792 1% $26,537 $13,111 $406, $406,347 $64,430 1% $4,266 $15,275 $481, $481,786 $65,074 1% $349,083 $11,892 $209, $209,669 $65,725 1% $16,306 $8,203 $267, $267,291 $66,382 1% $8,439 $10,369 $335, $335,603 $67,046 1% $30,526 $12,385 $384, $384,508 $67,717 1% $5,317 $14,550 $461, $461,458 $68,394 1% $32,780 $16,774 $513, $513,846 $69,078 1% $0 $19,193 $602, $602,117 $69,768 1% $14,561 $22,040 $679, $679,364 $70,466 1% $483,752 $16,545 $282, $282,623 $71,171 1% $6,625 $11,021 $358, $358,190 $71,882 1% $20,032 $13,444 $423, $423,484 $72,601 1% $1,206 $16,071 $510, $510,950 $73,327 1% $13,106 $18,937 $590, $590,108 $74,061 1% $122,464 $19,807 $561, $561,512 $74,801 1% $8,256 $20,817 $648, $648,874 $75,549 1% $50,906 $23,142 $696, $696,659 $76,305 1% $681,933 $13,785 $104, $104,816 $77,068 1% $22,612 $4,622 $163, $163,894 $77,838 1% $0 $7,098 $248, $248,830 $78,617 1% $10,289 $9,905 $327, $327,063 $79,403 1% $31,109 $12,292 $387, $387,649 $80,197 1% $39,326 $14,283 $442,803 Totals $2,090,398 $2,098,270 $382,115 Projected Reserve Fund Balance of $68,561 as of December 31, Printed by on 07-Jun-11
56 Exhibit 5 Recommended Reserve Funding Plan (3.50% Interest and 4.50% Inflation) (Data from Exhibit 4) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 Annual Reserve Fund Contributions $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 YEAR Annual Expenses $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 YEAR Annual Reserve Fund Balance $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 YEAR Printed by on 07-Jun-11
57 Exhibit 6 Current Fund Status (3.50% Interest and 4.50% Inflation) The Preserve at Sharp Mountain Project #: 011L-102 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 ($500,000) ($1,000,000) ($1,500,000) ($2,000,000) Year Projected Fund Balances Using Current Contributions Fund Balances Using Recommended Funding Plan Printed by on 07-Jun-11
VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS
Report of Turnover Survey VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS Grey Oaks Development Naples, Collier County, Florida Forge Engineering Project Number 2907-001.01 March 2015 Richard P..Lundberg, P.E cn=richard
www.citiesinspection.com October 5, 2015 Dear Client,
www.citiesinspection.com October 5, 2015 Dear Client, On 9/14/2015, Cities Inspection Service, Inc. completed a building inspection of the property located at 123 Oak Street, Someplace, Minnesota for you.
PROPERTY EVALUATION AND RESERVE FUND STUDY
PROPERTY EVALUATION AND RESERVE FUND STUDY COMPLEX NORTH & WEST AVENUES LAS VEGAS, NV Prepared for: HOMEOWNER S ASSOCIATION Prepared by: CRITERIUM ENGINEERS 22 Monument Square Portland, ME 04101 CONTENTS
MEMORANDUM. General: Foundation:
MEMORANDUM State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Central Region - Division of Construction and Operations Public Facilities Branch TO: Jennifer Murrel DATE: August 19, 2010
SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST
SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST Numerous steps are required in determining that a site is suitable for the installation of a solar system. The inspection procedures and their proper chronology are outlined below.
Inspecting to a higher standard.
Inspecting to a higher standard. Rob Hopkin Silver Spring, MD 20902 Monday, June 2, 2014 ProTec Inspection Services Inc. 19736 Selby Ave Poolesville, MD 20837 301-972-8531 www.protec-inspections.com [email protected]
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR: THE PURCHASE AND RENOVATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES AT 200/240 SOUTH 16 TH STREET ORD, NEBRASKA BY:
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR: THE PURCHASE AND RENOVATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES AT 200/240 SOUTH 16 TH STREET ORD, NEBRASKA BY: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ORD JULY 2014 A. STATEMENT
Commercial Roof Management
Disclaimer: This material is designed and intended for general informational purposes only, and is not intended, nor shall it be construed or relied upon, as specific legal advice. Roof damage is a leading
Architectural Inspection Site Structures
0141 Freestanding Shelters Open air shelters not attached to the building. Bike rack shelter with bike racks: This 8'x30' structure is located on the north east side of the building on the wooded landscape
Total Home Inspection Checklist
Total Home Inspection Checklist Use a checklist like this to make sure that you are looking at all parts of the house. Check off those items that are in good condition and make notes about those that are
Vision Home Inspection
Vision Home Inspection 324 Rams Run Shepherdsville KY 40165-7877 Inspector: James McFadden Property Inspection Report Client(s): Property address: Inspection date: View report summary This report is the
Exterior Elevated Elements Inspection Guidelines
Exterior Elevated Elements Inspection Guidelines Planning and Development 1. Guideline Purpose These guidelines are intended to assist practicing professionals in complying with Berkeley Municipal Code
Information Bulletin No. 4 What happens over the life of a building?
Information Bulletin No. 4 What happens over the life of a building? This series of Building Asset Management bulletins form part of a 3-year research project for corporations and managers. The bulletins
CONSERVATION MAINTENANCE WORKSHEET Universal Checklist
3.1 SITE 1 Concrete curbs Check for cracks, spalling, growth from joints X 2 Stone curbs Check for cracks, spalling, growth from joints X 3 Concrete walkways Look for uneven surfaces, ponding, growth from
Building Condition Assessment: 215-219 West Lexington Street Baltimore, Maryland
KPA The Joint Venture of EBA Engineering, Inc. and Kennedy Porter & Associates, Inc. 4813 Seton Drive, Baltimore, MD 21215 Phone: (410-358-7171) Fax: (410)358-7213 Building Condition Assessment: Baltimore,
PROPERTY INSPECTION OR ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES
PROPERTY INSPECTION OR ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES ADDRESS: Somewhere, FL CLIENT: GAIA GC ID No: 2015000 DATE: 12/31/2015 INSPECTION OR ASSESSMENT BY: GAIA CONSTRUCTION INC. CGC 1516136 FLORIDA HI-2792 FLORIDA
How To Plan A Building
State of Nevada Department of Administration Purchasing Division Las Vegas Purchasing Warehouse Facility Condition Analysis LAS VEGAS PURCHASING WAREHOUSE 1054 South Commerce Street Las Vegas, Nevada Site
Self-Home Inspection Checklist
To be used as a first home visit for note taking. Visit www.homeinspectiondirect.com for more tips and information about buying a home and hiring a home inspector. This form in no way replaces a professional
Facility Assessment Report, Montgomery Independent School District
THE LEARNING CENTER CAMPUS DATA THE LEARNING CENTER 700 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, Montgomery TX 77356 Year Built 1958 Approx. Total Square Footage Grades Served Current Enrollment 22,050 n/a n/a
PROPERTY INSPECTION OR ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES
PROPERTY INSPECTION OR ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES ADDRESS: 123 MAIN ST MIAMI, FL CLIENT: BUYER ID No: 2014193 DATE: 5/13/2014 INSPECTION OR ASSESSMENT BY: GAIA CONSTRUCTION INC. CGC 1516136 FLORIDA HI-2792
May 5, 2010. Client Client Address. Re: Inspection Address, Chicago, Illinois. Dear Mr. Client,
PROPERTY INSPECTION PROFESSIONALS May 5, 2010 Client Client Address Re: Inspection Address, Chicago, Illinois Dear Mr. Client, On May 4, 2010, Tomacor completed a property inspection of the above referenced
Facility Summary. Facility Condition Summary. Seattle School District David T. Denny International Infrastructure. Facility Components
Infrastructure Facility Condition Summary Weighted Avg Condition Score Facility Components Systems Surveyor/ Date Done Comments G Sitework.9 Site Improvements Parking Pedestrian Paving Site Development
PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT
(850) 297-1998 1716 Monticello Dr Tallahassee, Florida 32303 PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT THIS INSPECTION IS A DETAILED LISTING OF AREAS VISUALLY INSPECTED AT:, Tallahassee FL Client Tallahassee, FL 32304
Preventing Ice Dams on Roofs
Preventing Ice Dams on Roofs Facility Manager November/December 2005 When a roof leaks, facility managers inevitably receive complaints from building occupants. If it is winter, ice dams are often the
Windbrooke Townhome Association, Inc. Maintenance & Service Responsibility Chart
Roof Siding Chimney Doors and Windows Building Maintenance Repair and restoration of interior damage caused by roof leak; repair or replacement of structural supports under the roof decking and sheathing
Warranty Information TABLE OF CONTENTS PROCEDURES FOR WARRANTY 2
Warranty Information TABLE OF CONTENTS PROCEDURES FOR WARRANTY 2 PROTECTING YOUR DURO-LAST ROOFING 3 Safety Measures 3 Inspection 3 Maintenance Program 4 Sealants 4 Drainage 4 Parapets Walls 4 Building
March 19, 2014. Ms. Jean McDonald CAP Management 910 16th Street, Suite 1010 Denver, Colorado 80202
Ms. Jean McDonald CAP Management 910 16th Street, Suite 1010 Denver, Colorado 80202 Re: Prospector s Point Walkway/Façade Repairs Martin/Martin, Inc Project No.: 13.0358.S.02 Ms. McDonald: Per your request
CONDITION OF QUALITY ITEMS
CONDITION OF QUALITY ITEMS FOUNDATION Always look for moisture problems and any bulges or irregularities in the walls. Lines on the walls or floors may indicate water problems. Have these been cured? If
Facility Assessment for. 11801 East Main Street, Huntley, IL
Facility Assessment for 11801 East Main Street, Huntley, IL July 12, 2012 Prepared by: Dewberry Architects Inc. 25 S. Grove Avenue, Suite 500 Elgin, IL 60120 (847) 695-5840 The Village of Huntley requested
17,280 square feet Overview:
CENTRAL OFFICE Located at 167 Boston Post Road, East Lyme, Connecticut, the Central Office was built in 1916 as the original Flanders Elementary School and remains connected to the current school. The
How To Replace A Roofing System In Florida
Florida Consumer Considerations in Replacing their Roofing System The Florida Roofing, Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors Association provides the following general information to help Florida
Report Index PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 2 COMMON INTERIOR AREAS 3 INTERIOR ROOMS 6 KITCHEN 8 BATHROOMS 10
Report Index PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 2 COMMON INTERIOR AREAS 3 INTERIOR ROOMS 6 KITCHEN 8 BATHROOMS 10 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY INSPECTED: INSPECTION ADDRESS: 4722 Baltimore Avenue
PRE-PURCHASE INSPECTION REPORT
PRE-PURCHASE INSPECTION REPORT PREPARED FOR: PROPERTY ADDRESS: Waiheke Island DATE: 21 November 2012 Page 1 of 13 (a) This is a report of a visual only, non-invasive inspection of the areas of the building
Common Property Maintenance Code Violations. An illustrated guide
Common Property Maintenance Code Violations An illustrated guide 1) Lawn and Vegetation Overgrown weeds, grass, or vegetation. Vegetation obstructing sidewalks, driveways, and other right of ways. Improper
ELIGIBLE REPAIR PROJECT PARAMETERS
THE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY OF MUSKOKA ONTARIO RENOVATES PROGRAM FOR HOMEOWNERS ELIGIBLE REPAIR PROJECT PARAMETERS 1. To have your project considered and payment processed, all projects requiring a Building
Property Condition Assessment
Property Condition Assessment Business, Wisconsin Inspection Date: 8/2009 Prepared For: Business Owner Report Number: TD999909 Prepared By: Shamrock Building Inspection Consultants LLC N29 W29951 Shel-Mar
CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT 4701 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Fax: 651-429-8503. Re-Roofing: Asphalt Shingles
CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT 4701 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Fax: 651-429-8503 Re-Roofing: Asphalt Shingles This is a summary of the standard requirements based on the
MTA UNIVERSAL STATION PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE Los Angeles, CA. Project Manual and Specification 100% PE SUBMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
Los Angeles, CA Project Manual and Specification DIVISION 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS 01 01 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 01 11 00 SUMMARY OF THE WORK 01 14 05 METRO (OWNER) - DIRECTED STOPPAGES 01 20 00 PRICE AND PAYMENT
Estimating Database Checklist
Estimating Database Checklist If you are creating a new estimating database for projects, the following list offers a thorough listing of Main and Sub Categories. You can also use it as a checklist to
Building Condition Assessment Report
C2 - Nurses Resident (aka Administration) Building Condition Assessment Report Asset Address Address Construction Year Size (Gross Floor Area) Asset Type Floors Above Ground Inspection Date C2 - Nurses
Building Condition Assessment Report
Building Condition Assessment Report Asset C3c - Oak Terrace Cottage 121 Address Riverview Lands, 2601 Lougheed Highway, Coquitlam, BC. V5C 4J2 Construction Year Size (Gross Floor Area) 1920. 2,553 Sq.Ft.
Building Owners Guide to a Duro-Last System!
Building Owners Guide to a Duro-Last System Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction to Duro-Last Roofing Systems Section 2: Benefits of a Duro-Last Roofing System Section 3: Comparing a Duro-Last Roof
HOME INSPECTION CHECKLIST
CLOSING.COM LEARNING CENTER HOME INSPECTION CHECKLIST CONTENTS Attic 1 Balconies 1 Basement 1 Bathroom 2 Ceiling, Floors and Walls 2 Crawlspace 3 Decks and Porches 3 Doors and Windows 4 Drainage 4 Driveways
Home Inspection Report
4949 Brownsboro Rd Suite 293 Louisville, KY 40223 (502) 414-1440 [email protected] Inspected By: William Carter, HI-1956 Home Inspection Report Prepared For: Edward Cullen Property Address:
How To Check For A Deficiency
UPCS in Pictures The following pictures are not all inclusive nor does it cover every deficiency. The pictures, however are some of the most commonly cited deficiencies on REAC inspections. Erosion The
SIENA HARDWOOD FLOORING 6 COLLECTION FINISH WARRANTY
SIENA HARDWOOD FLOORING 6 COLLECTION FINISH WARRANTY LIFETIME FINISH WARRANTY - WOCA Oil Finish Issued by: WoodCareUSA LLC Lifetime Warranty WoodCareUSA protects the original purchaser with an encompassing
Commercial Roof Inspection Form
Inspection Date: Inspector: Building Information Building ID: No.: Used For: Year Roof Applied: Building Description: Permanent Temporary Building Type: Retail Industrial Residential Building Name: Building
Williamson and Associates, Inc. Report of Building Exterior Condition Evaluation, dated January 2 nd, 2013. (68 pages)
INNOVATIVE BUILDING AND ARCHITECTURE CONSULTANTS Mr. Bud Hall Senior Vice President of construction Turnberry Associates 19501 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 400 Aventura, FL 33180 Subject: The Nashville Hilton
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY CONDITION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY CONDITION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The South Carolina Code of Laws (Title 27, Chapter 50, Article 1) requires that an owner of residential real property (single
A Residential Owner s Guide to PERMITS. Elgin CITY OF PLANNING & NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
A Residential Owner s Guide to PERMITS CITY OF Elgin PLANNING & NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES CITY OF Elgin A Residential Owner s Guide Welcome! This booklet has been prepared to provide residential property owners
CID STREET INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
ABSTRACT An evaluation of the street infrastructure in Foxberry Estates Phase 1, including pavement condition, verification of construction techniques, and subgrade quality. Recommendations and costs for
TITLE: MASONRY PARAPET WALLS AND FLAT ROOF REQUIREMENTS 11/1/09
TITLE: MASONRY PARAPET WALLS AND FLAT ROOF REQUIREMENTS 11/1/09 PMT GUIDE # 10 Book of Order Section G-10.0102o: "The session is responsible for the mission and government of the particular church. It
Metropolitan Builders Association Masonry & Concrete Standard
Metropolitan Builders Association Masonry & Concrete Standard Background Masonry and concrete work in residential construction often provides the base structure upon which the house is built or as a veneer.
LIMITED ONE-YEAR WARRANTY SELLER S RESPONSIBILITY
LIMITED ONE-YEAR WARRANTY SELLER S RESPONSIBILITY Except as covered by a manufacturers limited warranty, the Seller hereby provides a Limited Warranty for the dwelling against defects in the original material
C. Remove all existing asphalt shingles, underlayment and any loose debris into contractor provided dumpsters.
SCOPE OF WORK Project Title: Replace Deteriorated Roof Singles at Cape Lookout National Seashore Maintenance Shop PMIS # 159350 Prepared By: Mike Baker Cape Lookout National Seashore 131Charles St Harkers
SODA SPRINGS JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 150 RECOMMENDED REPAIRS, REPLACEMENT, AND ADDITIONS OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST
SODA SPRINGS JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 150 RECOMMENDED REPAIRS, REPLACEMENT, AND ADDITIONS OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST SODA SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL REPAIRS AND UPGRADES SITE Construction Estimate = $100,000
Table of Contents. Division 2 Site Work Site Preparation Site Demolition Tree Protection Excavation, Trenching, and Backfilling for Utilities
Division 1 Requirements Design and Construction Quality Campus Master Plans Texas Tech University System Operating and Building Maintenance Project Administration Historically Underutilized Business (HUB)
ROOFS - Guidance for Repair, Maintenance and Replacement
ROOFS - Guidance for Repair, Maintenance and Replacement Guilford Association Architectural Committee ROOFING Slate and tile roofs are a critical design feature of Guilford homes. The homes were designed
Rehab Inspection Report Page 1
Rehab Inspection Report Page 1 Home Address: Construction Style: Number of bedrooms Square footage: Value of offer: Estimated rehab cost: Value of resale: Orientation of house: N S E W Note: orientation
ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN NEEDS ASSESSMENT
1. SAFETY, HEALTH, CODE 1.1 Structural Requirements, Seismic Stability 1.1.1 Primary Structure 1.1.2 Ceilings 1.1.2 Water damage in many classrooms. Replace tiles. 1.1.3 Cabinets, Equipment 1.1.4 Portables
Vari Inspection Services
Cover Page Vari Inspection Services Property Inspection Report Inspection prepared for: Sample Real Estate Agent: None - Date of Inspection: 5/13/2015 Inspector: Tony Vari License # HI8047 23110 STRD 54
PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Property Address:
Scott Certified Member P. O. Box 9007 Indianapolis, IN 690-007 (7)-750-60 Fax: 7-876-8 PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Property Address: Prepared for: Inspection Inspector: Lou Buehler Inspection #: BUYERS
INSPECTION PROPERTY ADDRESS: Fort Bend County, Texas
5006 Cherry Ridge Road Richmond, Texas 77406 281-342-9944 [email protected] INSPECTION PROPERTY ADDRESS: INSPECTION PERFORMED FOR: XXXX Drive Fort Bend County, Texas Mr. and Mrs. New Construction
COMPREHENSIVE PROPERTY INSPECTIONS
COMPREHENSIVE PROPERTY INSPECTIONS Thank you for selecting CPI for your Deficiency Observation. A full home inspection was not performed on this property at the buyers request. This inspection is a limited
BOROUGH OF NATIONAL PARK APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY ADDRESS OF PROPERTY FOR INSPECTION CURRENT OWNER
BOROUGH OF NATIONAL PARK APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY ADDRESS OF PROPERTY FOR INSPECTION # BLOCK LOT VACANT YES NO CURRENT OWNER NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE # PROSPECTIVE
Slavic Village Building Condition Review
Slavic Village Building Condition Review Slavic Village Development May 8, 2015 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Architecture was commissioned by Slavic Village Development to review five existing facilities
Inspection Item COMMENTS
APPENDIX 9 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST Participating Jurisdiction: Homeowner Name: Assisted Property Address: Date of Physical Inspection of Property: Total Square Footage of Property:
How to report a repair
How to report a repair for repairs to your home? We are committed to making sure your home is in a good state of repair. To meet our legal responsibilities we will: Keep the exterior (eg roof, walls, doors,
bout your HOUSE before you start Repairing And Replacing Materials Exterior Walls
A bout your HOUSE before you start Repairing And Replacing Materials Exterior Walls CE 28 h Exterior finish materials are expected to protect the house from the elements while providing an attractive appearance.
Home Warranty Inspection Report
Scope of the Inspection 1111 Sample Dr. home warranty inspection 2/30/2006 Home Warranty Inspection Report 1111 Sample Dr., Detroit, MI 48223 Inspection Date: February 30, 2006 Client: Alfred E. Neumann
NAHB 1-00-0000 PRODUCT DEFINITION
NAHB Standard Homebuilder Cost Codes Cost Code Description 1-00-0000 PRODUCT DEFINITION 1-01-0000 PREAQUISITION COSTS 1-01-0110 Feasibility Study 1-01-0120 Environmental Impact Study 1-01-0130 Option Fees
Evanston Main Street Station TOD Plan and Study. Appendix A.1: Station Area Existing Conditions
Evanston Main Street Station TOD Plan and Study Appendix A.1: Station Area Existing Conditions EvanstonMainStreetStation TODPlanandStudy A 1 AppendixA.1: ExistingConditions Table of Contents Station Locations
738-B-297 POLYMERIC CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY. (Adopted 02-20-14)
POLYMERIC CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY (Adopted 02-20-14) Description The polymeric concrete bridge deck overlay shall consist of an epoxy polymer that acts together with special aggregate to form an overlay
CLIENT. Inspection Report. 271 Front St. Alert Bay, B.C. Island Building Inspections V ANCOUVER I SLAND B. C.
CLIENT Inspection Report 271 Front St. Alert Bay, B.C. Island Building Inspections 2013 V ANCOUVER I SLAND B. C. Elevation Photos For the Property at 271 Front Street Alert Bay, BC ELEVATION PICTURES Front
Reference: BRM-00220488-A0 July 18 th, 2014. Cursory Visual Review of Various Below Grade Spaces and Exposed Foundation Walls
Reference: BRM-00220488-A0 July 18 th, 2014 Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8 Re: 1.0 Introduction Exp Services Inc. (exp) was retained by the Toronto
School Construction Authority Architecture & Engineering
SCOPING GUIDELINES 1.0 GENERAL GUIDELINES 2.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE SCOPING GUIDELINES 3.0 CATEGORIES AND COMPONENTS: The Flood Elimination/Below Grade Capital Category may include some or all of the following
Open House and Home Tour Checklist
1 The House Address: Number of floors: Listing price: Basement? Property tax: Outdoor space? Eugh closet space? Style: Eugh storage space? Square footage: Room for expansion? Number of bedrooms: What appliances
Roofing 101 - Signs that Your Roof Needs Repair/Replacement
By: Cherie Martel Roofing 101 - Signs that Your Roof Needs Repair/Replacement 1. Tell us a little bit about your company and its foundation. In 1963, Samuel T. Martel began a small family run roofing company,
BUNKER HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
INITIAL YEAR BUILT 1970 BUILDING AREA 98,200 SF CURRENT PROGRAM CAPACITY 332 ENROLLMENT 2008 387 WARD 5 PROPOSED PROGRAM CAPACITY 750 Site Plan BUNKER HILL - 1 PROPOSED PROGRAM PROFILE GRADE CONFIGURATION
How To Prevent Water Damage To A Home
Having inspected about 800 homes in the last four years, I have seen a lot of problems with many homes. Most of these problems are minor; however, there are some problems that are quite serious. One of
Building Condition Assessment: 109-111 North Howard Street Baltimore, Maryland
KPA The Joint Venture of EBA Engineering, Inc. and Kennedy Porter & Associates, Inc. 4813 Seton Drive, Baltimore, MD 21215 Phone: (410-358-7171) Fax: (410)358-7213 Building Condition Assessment: Baltimore,
Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute. Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning Contractors National Association
Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning Contractors National Association GUIDELINE B-1997 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT These guidelines for Roof Mounted Outdoor Air-
Larry Haight's Residential Roofing Co, Inc 15203 NE 95th Street Redmond, Washington Phone: (425) 881-9771 Fax: (425) 869-1010
Larry Haight's Residential Roofing Co, Inc 15203 NE 95th Street Redmond, Washington Phone: (425) 881-9771 Fax: (425) 869-1010 Custom bid generated for: Job site address: Lake Villas Condominium Attention:
OPTIMUS WORK CLASSIFICATION LIST ENTER ALL THAT APPLY
Cost Code # Description Cost Code # Description 01 00 00.001 General Requirements 02 00 00.001 Existing Conditions 01 31 19.13.001 Preconstruction Meetings 02 21 00.001 Surveys 01 32 33.001 Photographic
Roof Maintenance Scope of Work
Roof Maintenance Scope of Work Reviewed By: Approved By: Version 3.0 Date 08-09-07 Author K. Vandenbussche 1 BACKGROUND The Integrated Service Provider s program will provide superior on-site equipment,
201 WATER STREET FORWARDERS MUSEUM AND VISITORS INFORMATION CENTRE
STRUCTURAL INSPECTION REPORT DRAFT 201 WATER STREET FORWARDERS MUSEUM AND VISITORS INFORMATION CENTRE TOWN OF PRESCOTT Date: November 2013 GENIVAR No.: 131-20617-00 2611 Queensview Drive, Suite 300, Ottawa,
FORENSIC INVESTIGATION QUESTIONNAIRE
FORENSIC INVESTIGATION QUESTIONNAIRE PSE Project Number: - - Project Name: Person(s) Interviewed: Relationship to House: Please answer the following questions to the best of your ability. Exact dates are
ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN NEEDS ASSESSMENT
1. SAFETY, HEALTH, CODE 1.1 Structural Requirements, Seismic Stability 1.1.1 Primary Structure 1.1.2 Ceilings 1.1.3 Cabinets, Equipment 1.1.4 Portables 1.2 Fire / Life Safety 1.2.1 Corridor, Separation
SECTION 807 PUMP STATION REHABILITATION
SECTION 807 PUMP STATION REHABILITATION 807-1 DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitation of pump stations shall be defined as the cleaning, removal, repair and/or replacement of any and/or all components including but
PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY (2015 UNDERWRITING APPLICATION) Tab 34 Physical/Capital Needs Assessment & Energy Audit
Tab 34 Physical/Capital Needs Assessment & Energy Audit All Preservation developments must submit both of the following: A. Physical/Capital Needs Assessment A Physical/Capital Needs Assessment must be
Safeguarding our clients interests. Active Roof Leaks
Safeguarding our clients interests. Active Roof Leaks Vendor Requirements Visually inspect the roof for any damages Exterior inspection of the roof and gutters Interior ceiling inspection Interior attic
Inspection Tech. (330) 310-6559 http://www.inspectiontech.us [email protected] Inspected By: Aaron Westerburg
Inspection Tech (330) 310-6559 http://www.inspectiontech.us [email protected] Inspected By: Aaron Westerburg Inspection Tech Home Inspection Report Prepared For: Mr. & Mrs. Homebuyer Property
Upper Southampton Township Department of Licenses and Inspections 939 Street Rd. Southampton, Pa. 18966 Phone: 215-322-9700 Fax: 215-322-5842
Upper Southampton Township Department of Licenses and Inspections 939 Street Rd. Southampton, Pa. 18966 Phone: 215-322-9700 Fax: 215-322-5842 APPLICATION for ZONING and BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS:
Architectural Condition Survey
Architectural Condition Survey Santa Fe Railroad / AMTRAK Depot, Lawrence. Kansas for the City of Lawrence, 2002 Survey: (student) PI: William Carswell, Associate Dean, School of Architecture, University
Capital Expenditure. The common definition of capital expenditure is
Capital Expenditure Under standard accounting practices local authorities are required to account for revenue expenditure and capital expenditure differently. Capital expenditure is defined in the Local
Structural Assessment Report
Report Dallas Township Elementary School Dallas, Pennsylvania (JBCI Project No. 144911) 1655 Suburban Station Building 1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Philadelphia PA 19103 215 665 0497 5 Sandwood Drive
Crawford Inspection Services C.C.B. # 76914 www.crawfordinspections.com
Crawford Inspection Services C.C.B. # 76914 www.crawfordinspections.com Portland Area PO Box 665 West Linn, OR 97068 Ph: (503) 650-6957 Salem Area 5434 River Rd. N; #192 Keizer, OR 97303 Ph: (503) 362-5809
PELHAM MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL STONE FAÇADE REPORT. November 2007
PELHAM MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL STONE FAÇADE REPORT November 2007 PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION Determine possible locations of moisture intrusion into and through facade. Determine cause of horizontal and vertical
VOLUME V GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN CONSULTANT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX B: MASTER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND PREPARATION GUIDE, DIVISIONS 0-10
VOLUME V GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN CONSULTANT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX B: MASTER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND PREPARATION GUIDE, DIVISIONS 0-10 SECTION B1: PREPARATION GUIDE B1.1 INTRODUCTION... B1-1
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DISCLOSURE FORM
STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2013 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DISCLOSURE FORM Purpose of Disclosure Form: This is a statement of certain conditions and information concerning the property actually known
