M ethodology & Taiwan s P erfor m ance

Transcription

1 T im es H igher - QS W orld University R ank ings M ethodology & Taiwan s P erfor m ance B e n S o w te r H e a d o f R e s e a rc h QS T aiwan 11 A pril 2008

2 S peak er I ntroduction r a d u a te d in C o m p u te r S c ie n c e fr o m U n iv e r s ity o f N o ttin g h a m in U n io n P r iz e C h a ir, N o ttin g h a m U n iv e r s ity D e b a tin g S o c ie ty p e n t 3 m o n th s o n w o r k p la c e m e n t in n o r th e r n In d ia in o r k e d fo r in te r n a tio n a l s tu d e n t c h a r ity A IE S E C fo r t w o y e a r s a fte r g r a d u a tio n 2 n d Y e a r a s U K N a tio n a l P r e s id e n t O p e r a te d o n in te r n a tio n a l s tr a te g ic d e v e lo p m e n t te a m o in e d Q S in

3 Objectives s ta b lis h Q S b a c k g r o u n d & c r e d e n tia ls x p la in r e s e a r c h m e th o d o lo g y e w d e v e lo p m e n ts n d e r s ta n d lim ita tio n s o f r a n k in g s r o v id e in s ig h t in to p e r fo r m a n c e e n h a n c e m e n t s p e c ific to im p r o v e d r a n k in g

4 S ession F low

5 QS A b r ie f in tr o d u c tio n

6 F ounded 1989/ 1990 u n z io Q u a c q u a r e lli M B A W h a r to n B A C a r e e r G u id e p p r o x im a te ly s ta ff in s ia O ffic e in S in g a p o r e A s ia R e s e a r c h U n it

7 QS M ission to enable motivated people around the world to fulfill their potential, by fostering international mobility, educational achievement and career development Our C hannels p r im a r y r e s e a r c h le a d in g -e d g e e d ito r ia l & p u b lic a tio n s d e v e lo p m e n ta l e v e n ts w e b s o lu tio n s

8

9 v e r 1,1 8 0,0 0 0 v is its in v e r 6,0 0 0 v is its p e r d a y in n c r e a s in g ly s tr o n g p r o m in e n c e in G o o g le & Y a h o o s e a rc h e s a n k e d 5 3,6 2 6 in A le x a o m e o f th e T H E Q S W o r ld U n iv e r s ity R a n k in g s

10 T op Universities G uide N e w r e v is e d a n d u p d a te d e d itio n a v a ila b le n o w C o n ta in s m u c h in fo r m a tio n n o t a v a ila b le o n w e b

11 Other QS I nitiatives S World G rad S chool Tour S Top G rad S chool G uide S World MB A Tour S Top MB A C areer G uide S APPLE K orea July 2008 S Top Apply

12 QS Offices & E vents

13 T H E Q S W o r ld U n iv e r s ity R a n k in g s T H E CON T E X T

14 W hy rank universities? n te r e s t in r a n k in g th in g s a n d p e o p le H o s p ita ls S c h o o ls L o c a l a u th o r itie s R ic h lis ts ; B r ita in, w o r ld, A s ia n B r itis h, fo o tb a lle r s U n iv e r s itie s : T h e T im e s / U S N e w s e tc

15 W hy W orld R ank ings? ig h e r e d u c a tio n b e c o m in g m o r e g lo b a l n o w le d g e th e k e y d r iv e r o f in te r n a tio n a l c o m p e titiv e n e s s n c r e a s in g d e s ir e fo r c o m p a r a tiv e in fo r m a tio n n iq u e p o s itio n s o f T H E a n d Q S a s in te r n a tio n a l a n d in d e p e n d e n t e x p e r ts in h ig h e r e d u Cco ap y rtio n ig h t Q S T o p U n iv e r s it ie s (w w w.t o p u n iv e r s it ie s.c o m )

16 I nternational S tudy T rends o r ld w id e, th e d e m a n d fo r in te r n a tio n a l e d u c a tio n is fo r e c a s t to in c r e a s e r a p id ly n , a n e s tim a te d 3.1 m illio n s tu d e n ts s tu d ie d in te r n a tio n a lly h e r e a r e lik e ly to b e in e x c e s s o f 5.8 m illio n in te r n a tio n a l s tu d e n ts in w o -th ir d s o f th is g lo b a l d e m a n d w ill b e A s ia n s S d o m in a tio n o f in te r n a tio n a l s tu d e n t r e c r u itm e n t h a s b e g u n to fa lte r tig h t V is a s, in c r e a s e d c o m p e titio n (IIE, N A F S A, C C E ) p u n iv e r s it ie s.c o m ) o lo g n a A c c o Cr odp ywr ig hillt c2r0e0 8aQteS T ao pnu n eiv exr spit ielos s(wiow wn.t o in

17 S tudent M obility on the R ise

18 I nternational S tudy T rends o v e r n m e n t fu n d in g o f te r tia r y e d u c a tio n b e in g c u t (p e r c a p ita ) in m o s t c o u n tr ie s a r o u n d th e w o r ld (IF C ) a n y g o v e r n m e n ts ta r g e tin g in te r n a tio n a l s tu d e n ts a s a s o u r c e o f te r tia r y s e c to r fu n d in g u s tr a lia h a s e s tim a te d th a t in te r n a tio n a l s tu d e n ts a r e m o r e im p o r ta n t to th e ir e c o n o m y th a n m a n u fa c tu r in g & m in in g h e U K G o v e r n m e n t e s tim a te s th a t 2 7 0,0 0 0 s tu d e n ts c o n tr ib u te $ 3 b illio n in fe e s & a fu r th e r $ 3 b illio n in o th e r s p e n d in g

19 I nternational S tudy T rends y T h e E u r o p e a n C o m m is s io n s B o lo g n a A c c o r d w ill m a k e r o o m fo r o v e r 5 0 0,0 0 0 fir s t d e g r e e g r a d u a te s to s tu d y in o th e r E U n a tio n s fo r a M a s te rs d e g re e y In t h e U S A, r e c e n t A b r a h a m L in c o ln S tu d y A b r o a d le g is la tio n a im s to e n c o u r a g e 1 m illio n s tu d e n ts to s tu d y o v e r s e a s y 2020

20 W orld University R ank ings can help differentiate the active, from the dor m ant volcanoes! P rofes sor S hih, P resident National University of S ingapore C o p y r ig h t Q S T o p U nwww.topunivers iv e r s it ie s (w w w.t o p u n ivities e r s it ie.com s.c o m )

21 T H E Q S W o r ld U n iv e r s ity R a n k in g s A V A I L A B L E G L OB A L R ANK I NGS

22 A cadem ic R ank ing of W orld Universities p e r a te d b y S h a n g h a i J ia o T o n g U n iv e r s ity in C h in a o c u s e s p r in c ip a lly o n r e s e a r c h o u tp u t N o b e l P r iz e s & F ie ld s M e d a ls C ita tio n s H ic is tr o n g ly c o r r e la te d w ith e d u c a tio n a l r e p u ta tio n

23 S hanghai J iao T ong Criteria C riteria Indicator Weig ht Quality of Education A lu m n i o f a n in s tit u tio n w in n in g N o b e l P r iz e s a n d F ie ld s M e d a ls 1 0% S ta ff o f a n in s t it u tio n w in n in g N o b e l P r iz e s a n d F ie ld s M e d a ls 20% H ig h ly c ite d r e s e a r c h e r s in 2 1 b r o a d s u b je c t c a te g o r ie s A r t ic le s p u b lis h e d in N a tu r e a n d S c ie n c e * A r t ic le s in S c ie n c e C it a t io n In d e x e x p a n d e d, S o c ia l S c ie n c e C ita tio n In d e x 20% A c a d e m ic p e r fo r m a n c e w ith r e s p e c t to t h e s iz e o f a n in s titu tio n 1 0% Quality of Faculty R es earch Output S ize of Ins titution 20% 20%

24 W ebom etrics R ank ing of W orld Universities o c u s e s o n w e b p r o file R e s e a r c h p r o d u c tiv ity u s in g G o o g le S c h o la r S e a r c h E n g in e p e r fo r m a n c e S ite p o p u la r ity G o o d p r a c tic e s in w e b m a n a g e m e n t u lly a u to m a te d T r a c k s in th e r e a lm o f 1 4,0 0 0 in s titu tio n s r o n e to a n o m a ly d o m a in c h a n g e c a n b e A u n iv e r s City o p y r ig h t Q S T o p U n iv e r s it ie s (w w w.t o p u n iv e r s it ie s.c o m )

25 W ebom etrics Criteria Indicator Weig ht S ize N u m b e r o f p a g e s r e c o v e r e d fr o m fo u r e n g in e s : G o o g le, Y a h o o, L iv e S e a r c h a n d E x a le a d. 20% R ich Files A fte r e v a lu a tio n o f r e le v a n c e to a c a d e m ic a n d p u b lic a tio n a c tiv itie s a n d c o n s id e r in g th e v o lu m e o f th e d iffe r e n t file fo r m a ts, th e fo llo w in g w e r e s e le c te d : A d o b e A c r o b a t (.p d f), A d o b e P o s ts c r ip t (.p s ), M ic r o s o ft W o r d (.d o c ) a n d M ic r o s o ft P o w e r p o in t (.p p t). T h e s e d a ta w e r e e x tr a c te d u s in g G o o g le, Y a h o o S e a r c h, L iv e S e a r c h a n d E x a le a d. 1 5% S cholar G o o g le S c h o la r p r o v id e s th e n u m b e r o f p a p e r s a n d c ita tio n s fo r e a c h a c a d e m ic d o m a in. T h e s e r e s u lts fr o m th e S c h o la r d a ta b a s e r e p r e s e n t p a p e r s, r e p o r ts a n d o th e r a c a d e m ic ite m s. 1 5% Vis ibility T h e to ta l n u m b e r o f u n iq u e e x te r n a l lin k s r e c e iv e d (in lin k s ) b y a s ite c a n b e o n ly c o n fid e n tly o b ta in e d fr o m Y a h o o S e a r c h, L iv e S e a r c h a n d E x a le a d. 50%

26 W o r ld U n iv e r s ity R a n k in g s

27 T H E - QS W orld University R ank ings B e g a n in C o lla b o r a tio n b e tw e e n T im e s H ig h e r E d u c a tio n (T H E ) & Q S T H E r u n n in g s in c e T H E is a w e e k ly n e w s p a p e r d is tr ib u te d to a c a d e m ic s in th e U K a n d in te r n a tio n a lly F o r m e r ly a s s o c ia te d w ith T h e T im e s P u b lis h e d a n n u a lly in th e fa ll

28 T H E Q S W o r ld U n iv e r s ity R a n k in g s T H E M E T H OD OL OG Y

29 Our A pproach o u r k e y th e m e s, a s b a s is fo r c o m p a r is o n : R e s e a r c h Q u a lity G r a d u a te E m p lo y a b ility In te r n a tio n a l O u tlo o k T e a c h in g Q u a lity

30 R ank ing Criteria & W eights *All decisions regarding the allocation of weightings are the responsibility of the Times Higher Education Supplement C riteria R es earch Quality G raduate Employability International Outlook Teaching Quality Indicator B rief Des cription Weig ht* C ita tio n s p e r F a c u lty C o m p o s it e s c o r e d r a w n f r o m p e e r r e v ie w (w h ic h is d iv id e d in t o fiv e s u b je c t a r e a s ). 3,7 0 3 re s p o n s e s. S c o re b a s e d o n re s e a rc h p e r fo r m a n c e f a c to r e d a g a in s t t h e s iz e o f th e r e s e a r c h b o d y R e c r u ite r R e v ie w S c o r e b a s e d o n r e s p o n s e s to r e c r u ite r s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s In te r n a tio n a l F a c u lty S c o r e b a s e d o n p r o p o r t io n o f in t e r n a tio n a l f a c u lty 5% In te r n a tio n a l S tu d e n ts S c o r e b a s e d o n p r o p o r t io n o f in t e r n a tio n a l s t u d e n ts 5% S tu d e n t F a c u lty S c o r e b a s e d o n s tu d e n t /fa c u lt y r a t io P e e r R e v ie w 40% 20% 1 0% 20%

31 S election of I nitial L ist e g a n in w ith lis t o f th e to p w o r ld in s titu tio n s b y r e s e a r c h im p a c t x c lu d e s s in g le -fa c u lty in s titu tio n s x c lu d e s p o s tg r a d u a te -o n ly in s titu tio n s d d e d o n r e c o m m e n d a tio n fr o m c e r ta in c o u n tr ie s w h e r e E n g lis h p u b lic a tio n c u ltu r e is n o t s tr o n g (e.g. G e r m a n y ) a c h y e a r lis t is r e -e v a lu a te d o p yn r igsh t a r2 e 0 0 8wQ es lc T oo p Umn ivee r to s it ie sm(waw k w.teo p au n ivcear s sit iees.c o m ) m itte d in s tituctio

32 P eer review is an effective way to evaluate universities. I t tak es sm art people to recognise sm art people S ir R ichard S ykes R ector, Imperial C ollege C o p y r ig h t Q S T o p U nwww.topunivers iv e r s it ie s (w w w.t o p u n ivities e r s it ie.com s.c o m )

33 P eer R eview of R esearch Output e e r r e v ie w is th e c e n tr e p ie c e o f th is r a n k in g 5,1 0 1 r e s p o n d e n ts In te r n a tio n a l s p r e a d W e ig h te d R e s u lt s S u b je c t s p r e a d A r ts & H u m a n itie s E n g in e e r in g & IT L ife S c ie n c e s & B io m e d ic in e N a tu r a l S c ie n c e s S o c ia l S c ie n c e s O v e r a ll s c o r e b u ilt u p fr o m e a c h fa c u lty a r e a A c tiv e a c a d e m ic s 3 y e a r la te s t r e s p o n s e

34 P eer R eview S election of P eers y e a r la te s t r e s p o n s e n v ita t io n to p r e v io u s r e s p o n d e n ts o r ld S c ie n tific D a ta b a s e (1 8 0,0 0 0 ) S in g a p o r e H e a d q u a r te r s w w w.w o r ld s c ie n tific.c o m a r d e v D a ta b a s e (1 2, ) P a r t o f R e e d E ls e v ie r U K H e a d q u a r te r s w w w.m a r d e v.c o m c a d e m ic S ig Cno-u p y rp ig h tfa c2 0ility 0 8 Q S T o p U n iv e r s it ie s (w w w.t o p u n iv e r s it ie s.c o m )

35 Observations: P eer R eview a r v a r d s e c o n d to B e r k e le y x fo r d a n d C a m b r id g e e ll-lik e d u n iv e r s itie s a ll o v e r th e w o r ld ittle e v id e n c e o f p a tr io tis m b ia s K a n d N o r th A m e r ic a d o m in a te th e to p 20

36 T he R ecruiter R eview

37 R ecruiter R eview n o th e r g r o u p w h o h a v e k n o w le d g e o f u n iv e r s ity q u a lity e y r e le v a n c e to g r a d u a te e m p lo y a b ility c r ite r ia n tr o d u c e d fo r r a n k in g s o u r c e d fr o m Q S d a ta b a s e a n d m e d ia a n d u n iv e r s ity r e fe r r a ls (o v e r lis ts r e c e iv e d fo r )

38 Observations: R ecruiter R eview K S t r o n g b u t le s s s o th a n in p r e v io u s y e a r s o m e in s titu tio n s w ith p a r tic u la r s tr e n g th s d o w e ll B o c c o n i, H E C

39 Quantitative M easures

40 Quantitative M easures R e s e a r c h Q u a lity c ita tio n s /fa c u lty T e a c h in g Q u a lity fa c u lty s tu d e n t r a tio In te r n a tio n a l O u tlo o k % in te r n a tio n a l fa c u lty a n d s tu d e n ts G r a d u a te E m p lo y a b ility??

41 F ull T im e E quivalent (F T E ) ll p e r s o n n e l m e tr ic s b a s e d o n F T E f n o F T E d a ta is a v a ila b le a n a v e r a g e is c a lc u la te d b a s e d o n n a tio n a l o r r e g io n a l n o rm s T E n u m b e r s a r e a m o r e a c c u r a te m e a s u r e o f a n in s titu tio n s c o m m itm e n t to te a c h in g a n d r e s e a r c h

42 Observations: S taff/ S tudent in n e r C a lte c h S, F r e n c h, S w is s, N e th e r la n d s e tc in s titu tio n s a ll w e ll p la c e d o th A s ia n a n d E u r o p e a n a m o n g s t th e w e ll-p la c e d e a k c o r r e la tio n (0.2 1 ) w ith r e s e a r c h b u t n o t z e ro

43 Observations: I nternational S s h o w s u p b a d ly K U S T to p in s ta ff o n d o n S c h o o l o f E c o n o m ic s to p in s tu d e n ts a lte c h a m o n g fe w U S w ith in te r n a tio n a l s ta ff

44 Citations per F aculty S core C la s s ic m e a s u r e o f r e s e a r c h q u a lity C it a tio n s p e r s ta ff m e m b e r (n o t p e r p a p e r ) 5 y e a r s c o r e (c h a n g e d fr o m 1 0 in to in c r e a s e to p ic a lity ) S o u rc e : S c o p u s

45 Observation: Citations e d ic a l fa c u lty is a b ig p lu s r m a jo r b io m e d ic a l in c o m e a lt e c h th e w in n e r, th e n S ta n fo r d & M IT ig c o u n tr y e ffe c t

46 Z -S core A ggregation e th o d u s e d in v a r io u s d o m e s tic r a n k in g s s u c h a s T h e T im e s (U K ) ta b ilis e d a ta y e a r o n y e a r o r e a c c u r a te a p p lic a tio n o f w e ig h tin g s th r o u g h o u t th e s a m p le m o o th e s a n y a n o m a lie s th a t r e m a in 2 0e0 8s Q th S T oep Ucn ivue rr svit iees (wfo w wr.t oep uan ivce h r s it ie s.c o m ) s s e n tia lly sc mo p y or ig oh t th

47 T he E ffect of Z -S core A pplication on R ank ings I ndicators

48 2007 I ndicator Correlations Peer R eview Peer R eview Peer R eview Peer R eview Peer R eview R ecruiter R eview R ecruiter R eview R ecruiter R eview R ecruiter R eview International Faculty International Faculty International Faculty International S tudents International S tudents S tudent Faculty R ecruiter R eview S trong International Faculty Weak International S tudents Moderate S tudent Faculty Moderate Faculty C itations Moderate International Faculty Moderate International S tudents Moderate S tudent Faculty Weak Faculty C itations Weak International S tudents S trong S tudent Faculty Weak Faculty C itations Weak S tudent Faculty Weak Faculty C itations Weak Faculty C itations Weak

49 E ffects of 2007 developments n lin e S y s te m M o r e th o r o u g h a n d c o m p le te d a ta a ll th e w a y d o w n th e lis t L e s s n e e d fo r a v e r a g e s e e r R e v ie w C o u n tr ie s w ith d is p r o p o r tio n a te ly h ig h r e s p o n s e b u t a s m a ll n u m b e r o f in s titu tio n s lo s e u n n a tu r a l a d v a n ta g e T E D a ta U n iv e r s itie s w ith p a r tic u la r ly h ig h o r lo w n u m b e r s fo r p a r t-tim e w ill b e in flu e n c e d copus L e s s p r o n o u n c e d b ia s to w a r d s U S a n d E n g lis h s p e a k in g w o r ld -S c o r e a g g r e g a tio n w ew igw.th otep du niniv de rics ait ietosr.cs o m ) L e s s a d v a n ta gceo pfoy rrigthh te b 2e 0s 0t 8inQs StituT otiop nusn ivine rlos itwieesr (w

50 N OT E n u n d e r s ta n d in g a n d u s in g a n y r a n k in g, it e s s e n tia l to d e v e lo p a fu ll u n d e r s ta n d in g o f w h a t th e y a r e m e a s u r in g H E & Q S a r e c o m m itte d to : B e in g o p e n w ith o u r m e th o d s a n d d a ta w h e r e v e r p o s s ib le E n g a g in g w ith u n iv e r s itie s a n d o th e r s ta k e h o ld e r s to h e lp th e m u n d e r s ta n d th e r a n k in g s tiv e in fo r m a tio n in P r o v id in g C ao psy r igmh t u c2 0h0 8qQuS at olita p U n iv e r s it ie s (w w w.t o p u n iv e r s it ie s.c o m )

51 W orld University R ank ings I ssues? h e r a n k in g h a s lim ita tio n s. L a c k o f d a ta on: T e a c h in g q u a lity S t u d e n t s a tis fa c tio n In v e s tm e n t in in fr a s tr u c tu r e h e r a n k in g r e lie s o n th e b e s t c o m p a r a b le d a ta a v a ila b le

52 T H E Q S W o r ld U n iv e r s ity R a n k in g s T H E R E S UL T S

53 Com paring R esults THE QS SHANGHAI 1 2= 2= 2= 5 6 7= 7= 8 10 H a rv a rd C a m b r id g e Y a le O x fo r d Im p e r ia l P r in c e to n C a lte c h C h ic a g o UCL M IT H a rv a rd S ta n fo r d B e r k e le y C a m b r id g e M IT C a lte c h C o lu m b ia P r in c e to n C h ic a g o O x fo r d W EBOM ETRI CS M IT S ta n fo r d H a rv a rd P e n n S ta te B e r k e le y M ic h ig a n W is c o n s in M in n e s o ta Illin o is C o r n e ll

54 K ey F indings a rv a rd h e U S 5 7 in to p a r v a r d s le a d th e s m a lle s t y e t x fo r d a n d C a m b r id g e a ls o w e ll p la c e d u t th a t s o n ly p a r t o f th e s to r y

55 K ey F indings h e to p in c lu d e s u n iv e r s itie s in 2 8 s ta te s S, U K, C a n a d a, A u s tr a lia, N e th e r la n d s o r e a, C h in a, J a p a n, S in g a p o r e h a ila n d, M a la y s ia o n tin e n ta l E u r o p e

56 W here are the top universities?

57 Consistency of R esults H a rv a rd H a rv a rd H a rv a rd H a rv a rd 2 C a m b r id g e C a m b r id g e M IT B e r k e le y 3 Y a le O x fo rd C a m b r id g e M IT 4 O x fo rd M IT O x fo rd C a lte c h 5 I m p e r ia l Y a le S ta n fo r d O x fo r d 6 P r in c e to n S ta n fo r d B e r k e le y C a m b r id g e 7 C h ic a g o C a lte c h Y a le S ta n fo r d 8 C a lte c h B e r k e le y C a lte c h Y a le 9 UCL I m p e r ia l P r in c e to n P r in c e to n P r in c e to n E c o le P o ly te c h n iq u e E T H Z u r ic h 1 0 M IT

58 T he R esults = 2= 2= 5 6 7= 7= = = = = 33= 6 35= NAME COUNTRY H A R V A R D U n iv e r s it y U n iv e r s it y o f C A M B R I D G E U n iv e r s it y o f O X F O R D Y A L E U n iv e r s it y I m p e r ia l C o lle g e L O N D O N P R I N C E T O N U n iv e r s it y C A L I F O R N I A In s t it u te o f T e c h n o lo g y (C a lt e c h ) U n iv e r s it y o f C H IC A G O U C L (U n iv e r s it y C o lle g e L O N D O N ) M A S S A C H U S E T T S I n s t it u t e o f T e c h n o lo g y (M I T ) C O L U M B IA U n iv e r s ity M C G I L L U n iv e r s ity D U K E U n iv e r s ity U n iv e r s it y o f P E N N S Y L V A N IA J O H N S H O P K I N S U n iv e r s ity A U S T R A L IA N N a t io n a l U n iv e r s ity U n iv e r s it y o f T O K Y O U n iv e r s it y o f H O N G K O N G S T A N F O R D U n iv e r s it y C A R N E G IE M E L L O N U n iv e r s it y U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d K in g d o m U n it e d K in g d o m U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d K in g d o m U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d K in g d o m U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d S ta t e s Canada U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d S ta t e s A u s t r a lia Japan Hong Kong U n it e d S ta t e s U n it e d S ta t e s SCORE

59 T op A sia P acific* S chools * Excludes Aus tralia and New Zealand

60 T aiwan R esults

61 A verage P ositions for A sian I nstitutions in the T op 500

62 F aculty L evel D ata e e r o p in io n ita tio n s p e r p a p e r o t a g g r e g a te d

63 F aculty L evel: T op 5s A r ts & H u m a n itie s E n g in e e r in g & I T H a rv a rd B e r k e le y O x fo r d C a m b r id g e Y a le M IT B e r k e le y S ta n fo r d C a lte c h C a m b r id g e N a tu r a l S c ie n c e s B e r k e le y M IT C a m b r id g e H a rv a rd P r in c e to n S o c ia l S c ie n c e s H a rv a rd B e r k e le y LSE Y a le S ta n fo r d L if e S c ie n c e s & B io m e d ic in e H a rv a rd C a m b r id g e O x fo r d J o h n s H o p k in s B e r k e le y

64 F aculty L evel: T aiwan A r ts & H u m a n itie s N T U (5 3 ) N T H U (1 3 8 ) N C K U (1 9 7 ) N C T U (2 2 4 ) T a iw a n U S T (2 7 6 ) L if e S c ie n c e s & B io m e d ic in e N T U (8 0 ) T a iw a n U S T (3 2 5 ) S u n Y a t-s e n (3 6 5 ) N C U (3 7 2 ) N C K U (3 7 8 ) N a tu r a l S c ie n c e s N T U (9 3 ) F u J e n C a th o lic (2 9 2 ) N C U (3 9 0 ) E n g in e e r in g & I T N T U (6 4 ) N T H U (2 1 7 ) T a iw a n U S T (2 5 3 ) N C T U (3 2 0 ) N C K U (3 3 7 ) N C U (3 5 3 ) S o c ia l S c ie n c e s N T U (7 5 ) N C C U (2 2 3 = ) N T H U (3 6 0 ) S u n Y a t-s e n (3 8 8 = )

65 T he R esults v a ila b le a t w w w.to p u n iv e r s itie s.c o m T o p fo r th e fo llo w in g s u b je c t a r e a s A r ts & H u m a n itie s E n g in e e r in g & IT L ife S c ie n c e s & B io M e d ic in e N a tu r a l S c ie n c e s S o c ia l S c ie n c e s W o r ld s o ld e s t u n iv e r s itie s Y e a r o n y e a r r e s u lts

66 T H E Q S W o r ld U n iv e r s ity R a n k in g s T H E F UT UR E

67 Online D atabase u b m it a b r o a d r a n g e o f q u a n tita tiv e a n d q u a lita tiv e d a ta (in c lu d in g th o s e w e n e e d fo r th e r a n k in g s ) a b o u t y o u r in s titu tio n u s in g o u r o n lin e in te r fa c e o p u la te a n d e n r ic h y o u r p r o file o n w w w.to p u n iv e r s itie s.c o m d u c a te v is ito r s o n o th e r a s p e c ts o f y o u r in s titu tio n

68 D ata V alidation H ierarchy 1. C e n tr a l S ta tis tic s A g e n c y /D e p a r tm e n t D ir e c t c o n ta c t w ith in s titu tio n D a ta a v a ila b le o n in s titu tio n s o w n w e b s ite D a ta fr o m p r e v io u s y e a r If s o u r c e d v ia m e th o d 1 o r 2 T h ir d p a r ty d a ta e.g. H E S A (U K ), N C E S (U S ) e.g. W o r ld o f L e a r n in g S m a r t A v e r a g e N a tio n a l o r r e g io n a l, m a y e x c lu d e o u tlie r s S c a le d b a s e d o n a v a ila b le d a ta

69 R ecruiter R eview u p p ly u s w ith lis ts o f e m p lo y e r c o n ta c ts fo r th e r e c r u ite r r e v ie w E x c lu s iv e s in g le u s e o n ly B e n e fit y o u r in s titu tio n in r e c r u ite r r e v ie w Im p r o v e th e o v e r a ll s tr e n g th o f r e c r u ite r r e v ie w

70 B roadening E ngagement 007 K o r e a, J a p a n, T h a ila n d, P h ilip p in e s, N e th e r la n d s, H o n g K o n g, I n d ia, T a iw a n, M a la y s ia, S in g a p o r e, A u s tr a lia, N e w Z e a la n d, K o r e a, M a la y s ia, Ir a n, U S (N A F S A ), U K, H o n g K o n g (A P P L E ), C h in a (p la n n e d to d a te ) U K, I r e la n d, J a p a n, S in g a p o r e, M a la y s ia, T h a ila n d, T a iw a n, K o r e a, U S, A u s t r a lia, B e lg iu m

71 Com ing S oon! e c r u ite r R e v ie w B r e a k d o w n r e v ie w A c c e s s to R e c r u ite r S u r v e y c a d e m ic S ig n U p F a c ility u b je c t F o c u s e s e r s o n a lis e d R a n k in g s n n o v a tio n S h o w c a s e

72 T hank You B e n S o w te r b e q s n e tw o r k.c o m