Baltic Container Transport and Short Sea Services Structures and Future Challenges. by Soren Pedersen

Transcription

1 Baltic Container Transport and Short Sea Services Structures and Future Challenges by Soren Pedersen

2 Agenda 1. Team Lines at a Glance 2. Decision on Hub Port Location 3. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 4. Hamburg Terminal Efficiency and Feeder Network 5. Conclusions 2

3 Agenda 1. Team Lines at a Glance 2. Decision on Hub Port Location 3. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 4. Hamburg Terminal Efficiency and Feeder Network 5. Conclusions 3

4 1. Team Lines at a Glance Organisation TEAM LINES is One of the Leading European Container Feeder Companies Connecting the Main Container Hubs with Various Ports from Iberia to the Baltic States. Organisation: Established staff in 12 Branches Headquarter: Hamburg Parent Company: Delphis NV Service Network: Fixed-day Weekly Service Connecting More Than 35 Different Ports of Call per Week Modern Fleet: Vessels; modern ice class fleet incl. Kiel Max vessels (E4/E3) Units Partnerships with OOCL and CMA-CGM Capacity Generated in 2011: > 1 mill. TEU p.a. Short Sea: Delphis Logistics (affiliated company) is a European short sea operator offering multimodal container transport solution with own equipment. 4

5 1. Team Lines at a Glance Weekly Service Coverage 5

6 Agenda 1. Team Lines at a Glance 2. Decision on Hub Port Location 3. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 4. Hamburg Terminal Efficiency and Feeder Network 5. Conclusions 6

7 2. Decision on Hub Port Locations Example: Russia (St. Petersburg) Distances to St. Petersburg GOT RTM STP: HAM STP: GDN STP: GOT STP: nm via Kiel Channel 868 nm via Kiel Channel 565 nm 830 nm Aspects Influencing the Choice of Hub Port Location Mainline Vessel Milage (Bunker, Schedules, Partners) Feeder Vessel Milage (T/C, Schedule Integrity, Bunker) Natural Hinterland Market Political Support Ease of Transshipping 7

8 Agenda 1. Team Lines at a Glance 2. Decision on Hub Port Location 3. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 4. Hamburg Terminal Efficiency and Feeder Network 5. Conclusions 8

9 3a. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 1. Port Costs Index (Type PW 1400 Kiel Max - with 3 terminals in ANR/RTM/HAM) Antwerp Rotterdam Gothenburg Hamburg Gdynia Bremerhaven Singapore

10 3b. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 2. Comparison of hub port costs per vessel call (T/C, Port Costs, Bunker) Costs per vessel St. Petersburg Lisbon Stockholm Helsinki Riga Bilbao Gdansk Oslo Aarhus Average Costs per Vessel via Hamburg ( PW 1400 ) Distance in nm Average Costs per Vessel via Rotterdam ( PW 1400 )

11 3b. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 3. Impact on Slot Costs with Changing Bunker Prices Bunker price increase: If the average bunker price for one ton of bunker oil (380 cst) in Hamburg increases by 16 % from December 2011 to March Impact: The average slot costs for a St. Petersburg round voyage of a TEU vessel increases by 7 %.

12 3b. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 4. New Regulations for Bunker Grades within the Baltic Area

13 3c. Fleet Structure Feeder Vessels Development of Feeder Vessel Fleet Vessel size Fleet (Jan 11) Delivery 11 Orderbook Scrapping FY 11 Fleet (Dec 11) Capacity Growth 11 Fleet (Dec 13) Capacity Growth TEU ,2% 186-2,1% TEU ,0% 306-1,6% TEU ,8% 747 4,9% TEU ,3% ,1% Source: Maersk Broker Container Charter Market Report

14 Agenda 1. Team Lines at a Glance 2. Decision on Hub Port Location 3. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 4. Hamburg Terminal Efficiency and Feeder Network 5. Conclusions 14

15 4. Hamburg Terminal Efficiency FLZ Eurogate CTB CTT Productivity No congestion Free-Port-Status CTA Hinterland Port costs (1400 TEU vessel): Draft challenge 15

16 4. Hamburg s Feeder Network 141 Departures per Week from HHLA Terminals (October 2010) Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 16

17 Agenda 1. Team Lines at a Glance 2. Decision on Hub Port Location 3. Cost Structure of Baltic Feeder Services 4. Hamburg Terminal Efficiency and Feeder Network 5. Conclusions 17

18 5. Conclusion Future Challanges Hub Port Locations More than Meets the Eye. Development of Port Costs, T/C, Bunker Future Bunker Prices, New regulation Terminal Efficiency Influenced by Multiple Aspects Productivity, Congestions, Hinterland- and Feeder-Connectivity etc. TEAM LINES Response : Focus on one Primary Hub Location (Hamburg/Bremerhaven). Deploying the largest Ships Available And Suitable for Individual Trades. Share the Benefits but also the Burdens (Cost). 18

19 Thank you for your attention! 19