ESRI_UC_2015_No843_Integrating Flood Risk Management and Salmon Habitat Restoration_CampbellSW

Similar documents
US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Lower Dungeness River Estuarine & Floodplain Restoration

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

WRIA 8 Staff Team DRAFT 2017 Work Plan

Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs. Disaster Recovery and Mitigation Planning Ft. Worth, Texas February 15, 2012

SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

Square Peg, Round Hole Maximizing Conservation in a Flood-Insurance Construct

Snapshots: Resilient Lands and Waters Initiative

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Public Law and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs

Update on Ecosystem Services in the Federal Government. Kristin E. Skrabis Office of Policy Analysis U.S. Department of the Interior April 30, 2014

Ecological Mitigation Strategies

Request for Proposal. Request for Proposal for GreenLink Bellingham Technical Analysis and Community Engagement, Bellingham, WA

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

Request for Proposals: Suisun Marsh Managed Wetlands BMP Water Quality Improvement Pilot Project Technical Support

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

Fiscal Year St. Lucie River Issues Team Surface Water Restoration Grant Package

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Civil Works - FY 2015 CROmnibus & FY 2016 Budget

The West Virginia Stream and Wetland Valuation Metric

COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD Invasive Phreatophyte Control Program Grant Application Revised October 2013

Program Details Notes Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA)

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Post-Flood Assessment

Adaptive Management Ecological Restoration Conference

Eco-Logical Approach to Infrastructure Development Initiative. May 12 & 14, 2010 Eco-Logical Initiative Technical Meeting

INVENTORY OF FLOOD CONTROL AGENCIES

Ecosystem Services, Wetlands and Houston s Growth. Jim Lester

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

URBAN WATERS. Federal Partnership. LosAngeles River Pilot

NAFSMA Position on Floodplain Management Issues

A. Flood Management in Nevada

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

Subactivity: Habitat Conservation Program Element: National Wetlands Inventory

How the Chicago District, US Army Corps of Engineers Conducts Project Management 20 November 2013

Restore Americas Estuaries 5 th National Conference

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

Presentation Program Outline

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TITLE: [Name of municipality] Storm Water Abatement Feasibility Study

Klamath Tracking and Accounting Program Vision

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

2013 Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) Status Report and Update

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

How To Restore A Shoreline In City Of Granite Falls

Overview of Proposition 1 TRACIE BILLINGTON, CHIEF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BRANCH DIVISION OF INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT

Section 19. Basin-wide Mitigation Action Plans

APPENDIX B. Delaware County Partners Action Plan

Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect

OVERVIEW MIDDLE CREEK FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT October 3, 2012 INTRODUCTION

A Presentation to the Houston Hispanic Architects and Engineers

A9. Flood Damage Reduction

Tradeoffs of Ecosystem Services from Wetlands in the Houston Region

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

Walla Walla Bi state Stream Flow Enhancement Study Interim Progress Report. Department of Ecology Grant No. G

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Linking Wetland Alteration to Coastal Flooding: predictors, consequences, and policy implications

More Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect

Chum Salmon recovery in Oregon tributaries to the lower Columbia River. Kris Homel Chum Reintroduction Coordinator

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

How To Improve Water Resources Information And Analysis For Integrated Water Management

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

Restoring and protecting natural floodplains reduces flood losses and benefits the environment. Photo: USDA NRCS.

$200 Billion. Ecosystem Services: The Gridlock Breaker. Four Types of Capital. Built Capital Social Capital Human Capital Natural Capital

Local hazard mitigation plans Disaster recovery plans Flood preparedness activities/public education Mitigation projects (construction) Post-disaster

Develop and Implement a Pilot Status and Trend Monitoring Program for Salmonids and their Habitat in the Wenatchee and Grande Ronde River Basins.

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

CBP Efforts to Identify Priority Areas and Enhance Monitoring in the Bay Watershed

Integrated Water Resources Science and Services. National Water Center

Floodplain Management - What You Need to Know

Nature in Neighborhoods Grants:

Agenda Item: 10 Attachment: 1

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

San Juan County / WRIA2 Lead Entity Program for Salmon Recovery

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Overview. Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act

National Environmental Policy Act/ Clean Water Act Section 404 (NEPA/404) Merger Process and Agreement for Transportation Projects in Colorado

OWEB Prioritization Framework. Improvement Priorities at Basin and Watershed Scales

River Restoration Activities in the Rio Grande Canalization Flood Control Project. Upper Rio Grande Citizens Forum Elizabeth Verdecchia July 19, 2012

Council; PDS Land Capacity Analysis concerns for comp. plan Thursday, January 21, :12:32 AM

Floodplain Management Today

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

Focus Areas: Program/Project Management, Repetitive Loss Properties, Flood Map Modernization, Standard Business Processes.

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

The History and Status of Wetland Mitigation Banking and Water Quality Trading

Request for Proposal (RFP) Black Forest Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Update

Chapter 11. Costs and Funding

Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon. fact SHEET

THE DUNGENESS WATER EXCHANGE. Washington Water Trust March 13, 2013 Sequim Realtors

Transcription:

ESRI_UC_2015_No843_Integrating Flood Risk Management and Salmon Habitat Restoration_CampbellSW Advancing an integrated approach to flood risk management and habitat restoration planning in the Puget Sound region of Washington, by identifying early opportunities areas where agencies can apply a coordinated investment approach to reduce flood risk and advance habitat restoration goals. Scott W. Campbell DRAFT: 01 July 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers

Pilot Project Objectives Floodplains by Design Identifying the floodplain areas with the highest potential to advance multiple benefits (i.e. flood risk reduction and habitat recovery); Developing a tool to help project proponents secure critical support and funding; and Initiating a multi-agency, coordinated investment approach to increase agency efficiency and effectiveness. Early Opportunities Develop the tool to help project proponents secure critical support and funding Prioritize specific floodplain project areas with the highest potential to advance multiple benefits (i.e., nonstructural FRM and salmon habitat) Identify floodplains and floodplain managers for additional conferences Identify potential overlap with existing GI and CG projects and/or potential marketable projects for PAS, FPMS, and CAP Market tool to other watersheds (e.g., Missouri river)

Major Milestones & Deliverables Accomplished Completed the kickoff meeting with stakeholders 30 July 2013 Completed acquisition of 7 databases key to identifying floodplain connectedness and repetitive loss locations 15 November 2013 Identified 10 high priority locations for FRM/salmon habitat Initiated economic analyses on targeted properties to quantify acquisition opportunities Remaining: Complete analysis to determine most cost effective projects from an integrated ecosystem service and flood risk reduction perspective Early May 2014 Complete targeted floodplain managers meetings End May 2014 Identify possible integration opportunities and connections to current USACE projects or other partner opportunities End May 2014 Measurable benefits document (funds expire) 06 July 2014

Progress Toward Program Objectives Overall Addresses Expressed State Need Long term protection of natural and beneficial functions of Western WA floodplains Leverages Resources (USACE Project Budget: $125K) Agency The Nature Conservancy Investment $100K Reduces/Manages Flood Risk Identifies high priority collocated restoration and FRM opportunities along PS rivers for inclusion in FbD program Reduces Future Expenditures Facilitates greater integration/cost efficiencies across FED/State FRM/Ecorest programs Results in Action by others Identifies agencies and funding sources suitable to the type project. EPA National Estuary Program $500K FEMA $55K Puget Sound Partnership $30K

Tasks Update salmon projects from the Habitat Work Schedule and FEMA s Repetitive Loss and Severe Repetitive Loss properties to include properties acquired hazard mitigation programs Ground truth opportunity areas to identify places where it appears integrated actions could be pursued Conduct workshops or hold meetings with local floodplain managers and salmon recovery lead entities to identify projects of interest Conduct a socioeconomic analysis to determine which projects are most cost effective from an integrated ecosystem service and flood risk reduction perspective Identify possible integration opportunities and connections to other USACE projects Identify Silver Jacket partner programs that could support implementation of these projects

Fish Habitat List of Priorities ESA: Bull Trout, Steelhead, Chinook Spawning Data: Bull Trout, Steelhead, Chinook Proximity to wetlands Floodplain connectivity Water Quality (Impaired) Flood Risk Management Repetitive loss locations Floodplain connectivity Flood damage claims

Environmental List of Data Sources ESA: SSHIAP fish distribution (C. Konrad, USGS) Spawning Data: Confirmed spawning (WDFW) Proximity to wetlands: NWI wetlands (USFWS) Floodplain connectivity (C. Konrad, USGS) Water Quality: CWA Section 303d list (EPA) Flood Risk Management Repetitive loss locations (FEMA) Floodplain connectivity (C. Konrad, USGS) Flood damage claims (FEMA)

Floodplain Connectivity (C. Konrad, USGS) Valley bottom; above floodplain Topographically connected; anthropogenically disconnected Topographically connected, roads and levees may penetrate, but do not surround

Flood Damage = 7 Fish Habitat = 6.99 Total Score = 13.99 Flood Damage = 10 Fish Habitat = 6..58 Total Score = 16.58 Flood Damage = 8 Fish Habitat = 7 Total Score = 15 Flood Damage = 7 Fish Habitat = 7.08 Total Score = 14.08

c c c c SAME! Top Ten Fragments by Total Score Fragment ID Flood Damage Score Fish Habitat Score Total Score 53423 10 7.80375 17.80375 33374 10 7.60626 17.60626 35391 10 7.17852 17.17852 40882 10 7.16994 17.16994 53547 10 7.15983 17.15983 6203 10 7.14957 17.14957 47906 10 7.14735 17.14735 7548 10 7.13522 17.13522 55581 10 7.11763 17.11763 6500 10 7.07987 17.07987 Top Ten Fragments by Acres Fragment ID Flood Damage Fish Habitat Total Points ACRES 50616 10 6.16923 16.16923 15,498 55581 10 7.11763 17.11763 5,051 47906 10 7.14735 17.14735 3,802 33824 10 6.12823 16.12823 3,127 34550 10 6.58147 16.58147 2,743 34132 10 6.91077 16.91077 2,716 51109 5 7.04362 12.04362 2,589 34802 10 6.88296 16.88296 2,355 35571 10 6.74452 16.74452 2,314 40585 9 7.05282 16.05282 2,204

Stillaguamish and North

Snohomish and South

Snohomish Fragment Id 35391

Next Steps Produce next 9 segment maps Pilot properties cost benefit analysis Repetitive loss versus acquisition Conduct FRM meetings in targeted segments Fragment/basin overlap with ongoing GI/CAP projects Projects suitable for USACE programs Prepare segment fact sheets Prepare the final report

FY14 NS FRM Pilot Project RFP Ground Rules The deadline for submission of proposals has been extended to 25 April $500K for the flood risk management and just over $1M for nonstructural projects is available Coordinate all proposals with the appropriate District FPMS PM first. All proposals will be forwarded through the District FPMS PM to MSC FPMS PM Funding available through SJ

Questions?