Test Pile Program for US 90 Biloxi Bay Bridge Biloxi to Ocean Springs Mississippi

Similar documents
Kentucky Lake Bridge Pile Load Testing Overview Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Columbus, Ohio 10/28/2015

GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Foundation design to Eurocode 7

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

SECTION 700 STRUCTURES SECTION 701 DRIVEN PILING MATERIALS Materials Materials shall be in accordance with the following:

How to Design and Build a Fence/G traverse Bridge or Graffiti Project

Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project

The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study. Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc.

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

CSXT Emergency Response for May 2010 Flood Repairs

DRIVEN PILE COST COMPARISON FOR TWO LARGE WISCONSIN DOT BRIDGE PROJECTS

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

Design and Construction of Auger Cast Piles

Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES

PILE FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2

Winnipeg Water Treatment Program

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

Source: Port Mann Bridge Plans Unveiled Today, CBC News, February 4, 2009.

Driven Concrete Pile Foundation Monitoring With Embedded Data Collector System

PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE

LEADSYSTEMS. Vertical Configuration. Aft Batter Below Grade. Side Batter. Forward Reach. Raised Leads Above Grade. Forward Batter

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

Instrumentations, Pile Group Load Testing, and Data Analysis Part II: Design & Analysis of Lateral Load Test. Murad Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E.

MICROPILE FOUNDATIONS IN KARST: STATIC AND DYNAMIC TESTING VARIABILITY

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

Retaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations

Up-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

A DEEP FOUNDATION COMPARISON: DRIVEN vs BORED PILES. Professor s Driven Pile Institute Logan, UT June 26, 2013

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

INSTALLATION SPECIFICATION FOR DRIVEN PILES

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

Durability, Versatility

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils

Contractor of the Year

Chapter 7 Substructure Design General Substructure Considerations Foundation Design Process

Foundation Underpinning Process and Relationship with Groundwater in West- Central Florida

Investigation of Unknown Bridge Foundations in Oregon

The unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity.

The demand for new roadway

Page B-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 LOAD TESTS

Table of Contents. July

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E. 36th Annual Conference on Deep Foundations, Boston, MA

Table of Contents 16.1 GENERAL Overview Responsibilities

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

Emergency repair of Bridge B421

The International Workshop on Micropiles, 2007

Managing North Carolina's MSE Wall Assets through Design, Construction and Performance

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

5-Day Training Workshop On Flood Mitigation. On: February 17, Islamabad. Sequence of Lecture

Disputes and Claims. 3 Processes Dispute Resolution and Administrative Claims Process

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

Appendix A Alternative Contracting General Engineering Consultant RFP. Appendix A

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

Breakaway Walls

Chapter 22. Lump Sum Project Guidelines

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

PENNDOT 3D MODELING FOR STRUCTURES WORKSHOP. Presented by: Steven Pletcher and Chris Daniels, P.E. October 21, 2014

Investigation of the November 2, 2013 collapse of concrete beams at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood Airport runway project

STATIC PILE LOAD TEST MANUAL. GEOTECHNICAL CONTROL PROCEDURE GCP-18 Revision #4

Helical Piles. A Practical Guide to Design and Installation

Value of Instrumentation Systems and Real-Time Monitoring: An Owner s Perspective

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

1,045 m length of the Deh Cho Bridge

Dynamic Pile Analysis Using CAPWAP and Multiple Sensors Camilo Alvarez 1, Brian Zuckerman 2, and John Lemke 3

How To Model A Shallow Foundation

A COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF THE VINCENT THOMAS SUSPENSION BRIDGE

How to Estimate the Cost of Support of Excavation for Foundation Installation. CPE Candidate No May 15, 2013

Scour and Scour Protection

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

MHD BRIDGE SECTION WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNIT PRICES GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNIT PRICE TABULATION SHEETS

FY11 Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab and Point Repair Bid Tabulation

Pro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

UNDERPINNING OF NEW STUDENT HOUSING BUILDING USING MICROPILES, NORTH CAROLINA USA

COSMOS 2012: Earthquakes in Action COSMOS 2012

MEMORANDUM West Swann Avenue, Suite 225 Tampa, Florida Phone (813) Fax (813)

Analysis of the Interstate 10 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina

Civil. 2. City of Seattle Supplement to the Specification for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, most current addition.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 6

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

302 E. Millsap Fayetteville, AR mwyusa.com

Quality Control and Quality Assurance Guide

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

2013 Pile Driving Safety Presentation

11 Guardrail. W-Beam Guardrail Pre-Installation Inspection During Installation Basis for Use. Modified Guardrail. End Treatments and Transitions

Transcription:

Test Pile Program for US 90 Biloxi Bay Bridge Biloxi to Ocean Springs Mississippi 2006 STGEC November 1, 2006 W. Robert Thompson, III, P.E. Dan Brown and Associates, LLC Project Summary US 90 Bridge over Biloxi Bay destroyed by Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005. Design-Build contract awarded June 7, 2006 Project cost: $338.6 million Schedule date open to traffic: March 28, 2008 1

Owner Mississippi DOT Project Team Contractor Joint Venture GC Constructors Massman Construction Co. Kiewit Southern Co. Traylor Brothers, Inc. Design Engineer Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. Geotechnical Engineer Eustis Engineering Company, Inc. Geotechnical QC Consultant Dan Brown and Associates, LLC 2

3

Project Design Main Bridge Two bridges of 3 lanes each South bridge (east bound) includes 12-foot wide bike/pedestrian lane Increased main span height to 95 feet above Biloxi Bay, eliminating need for draw span New bridge over CSX railroad on east approach Changes to approach grades Pile supported retaining walls MSE walls Main Bridge Pile Foundations 24-inch and 30-inch pre-stressed PCC piles Axial service loads: 320 to 450 kips for 24-inch piles 420 to 570 kips for 30-inch piles Vessel impact loads of 200 kips to 2850 kips at piers Pile footings with 4 to 36 piles each Total scour of 20 to 30 feet below mudline 4

Pile Foundations CSX Bridge, US 90 Abutments and Approach Embankment Walls 18-inch pre-stressed PCC piles Axial service loads ranging from 120 to 200 kips Lateral loads ranging from 10 to 40 kips 5

6

Geotechnical Exploration 62 Soil Test Borings (39 for main bridge) Boring drilled at both abutments, every other approach pier, and at both main channel piers Borings drilled 150 feet below mudline Laboratory testing included UC and UU triaxial tests 7

Test Pile Program Understanding The Big Picture Where is the risk? Schedule!!!!!! How to reduce risk? Provide information that reduces schedule uncertainties: pile set-up, restrikes, extra driving, etc. 8

Test Pile Program Indicator Piles 21 total piles 19 on main bridge, 2 on CSX bridge 4 18-inch (Main Bridge Abutments and CSX) 10 24-inch 7 30-inch Tip elevations estimated by axial analysis using DRIVEN and other techniques Piles driven with continuous PDA monitoring Restrikes performed over time Test Pile Program Objectives of Indicator Piles 1. Verify that piles can be installed to minimum tip elevation with the hammer selected. 2. Evaluate need for any driving aids to achieve #1. 3. Define the driving resistance level below which reduced stroke is needed to avoid pile damage, and evaluate any changes required to cushions to avoid pile damage. 9

Test Pile Program Objectives of Indicator Piles 4. Verify or adjust the estimated tip elevation with appropriate allowance for setup. 5. Verify end of drive acceptance criteria. Test Pile Program Evaluation of Pile Setup Systematic documentation of setup through restrike measurements at a range of times after initial driving. End-of-drive blow count established which includes an allowance for setup. Provide assurance to the project owner that piles driven to satisfy the established criteria will ultimately achieve the required ultimate axial resistance. Reduce the risk of delays due to questions regarding pile axial resistance and the need for set checks through restrikes or splices. 10

Test Pile Program Load Tests Static axial load tests IP-3 (24-inch) and IP-17 (30-inch) Statnamic axial load tests IP-8 (24-inch) and IP-14 (30-inch) Statnamic lateral load tests IP-8 (24-inch) and IP-14 (30-inch) Separate piles were driven for each test (axial and lateral) 11

12

13

Summary of Axial Load Test Data IP-03 Static Test; IP-08 and IP-14 Statnamic Test 14

15

16

17

18

19

Test Pile Program Results Test pile program successfully: Documented setup Provided end of drive criteria Validated installation methods Verified axial and lateral resistance Allowed appropriately conservative pile tip elevations higher than planned during bid First pile at each bent is monitored with PDA to evaluate driving stresses. Production piles started mid-september. Questions? 20