Bus Rapid Transit Applications Phase II Report

Similar documents
Los Angeles Metro Rapid

National Bus Rapid Transit Institute (NBRTI) At the University of South Florida

When is BRT the Best Option? 1:30 2:40 p.m.

Rapid Transit Backgrounder

IMPLICATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED

A Review of Transit Technology Specifications

Bus Rapid Transit Service Design

Transitways and the RouteAhead for Calgary Transit

Implementing a BRT Project: The Final Steps 10:10 11:30 a.m.

BRT Branding, Imaging and Marketing

Bus Rapid Transit Stations and Stops

MANAGEMENT PLAN. Fiscal Year

APPLICATION FORM MASS TRANSIT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION PROJECT NAME LEAD AGENCY PROJECT TYPE GENERAL PROJECT AREA

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures

Mount Royal College Transit Service Plan

Bus Rapid Transit For New York City

BRT BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Research Results Digest 352

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Engineering and Environmental Analysis

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (Metro) Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Overview

a GAO GAO MASS TRANSIT Bus Rapid Transit Shows Promise Report to Congressional Requesters United States General Accounting Office

110 EXPRESSLANES PERFORMANCE UPDATE, AS OF 2/28/13

Strategic Regional Transit Plan

Welcome to the LRT Overview Open House

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

4.5 TRANSPORTATION - YEAR 2025 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROPOSED TIMP ESTIMATION OF TRIP REDUCTIONS WITH TIMP TRANSIT AND TDM PROGRAMS

TRAIN WRAPS TIMETABLE ADS TICKETS STATION POSTERS METROLINK MATTERS NEWSLETTER STATION SAMPLING WEBSITE: METROLINKTRAINS.COM

Addendum to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Miami-Dade Transit Service Standards

Transit Technology Alternatives

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

Proposed Service Design Guidelines

MAKING TRACKS. A Primer for Implementing Transit Fixed Guideway Projects

Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project Business Case Executive Summary. February Reviewed by

to imagine a transportation vision

Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

An Overview of Managed Lanes in the U.S.A. Darren Henderson, AICP

Memo. Date: January 18, StarTran Advisory Board. From: Brian Praeuner. Review of Peer Transit Systems

Development of Bus Rapid Transit Information Clearinghouse

VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project

Growth of Addis Ababa

Who is implementing managed lanes with pricing strategies? Operational Under Construction/ Development

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

New Haven Hartford Springfield Rail Corridor Glory Days: trains/day in 1947 Bankers Ltd 3 hour service to NYC Sleeper, parlor & gril

ExpressLanes CAG Summit. March 2, 2010

The LYNX Transit Master Plan. METROPLAN Orlando Presentation

TCRP Report 153: Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations. Part 2: Station Typology and Mode of Access Planning Tool

Transportation Breakout Session. Curvie Hawkins Mark Rauscher Mike Sims Paul Moore

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

1 FIXED ROUTE OVERVIEW

transit service policy july 2012

Median Bus Lane Design in Vancouver, BC: The #98 B-Line

TIMETABLE ROUTE. Effective 4/24/16 Broward Central Terminal to Hillsboro Blvd. via Dixie Highway

Transit in the United States 3. Operating Costs and Performance Measures 13. Quality of Transit Service 19. ADA Compliance Bus 28

Figure L3: Level 2 SR 99 Elevated Light Rail Alternative Detail - 1 of 4

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about DART

Questions and Answers about the Orange Bus/Rail Investment Plan

South Florida East Coast Corridor (SFECC) Projects. February 7, 2012

BUS RAPID TRANSIT for Decision-Making

Metro Rail Gating Study

Municipal Transportation Quality Review

State of Good Repair Roundtable Chicago, Illinois. Asset Management Systems MBTA Approach and Lessons Learned

2012 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

9 Best Practices in Transit. Best Practices in Transit Summary Transit First Bus Rapid Transit Urban Streetcars Light Rail

REINVENTING TRANSIT FROM A SOCIAL SERVICE TO A CRITICAL PUBLIC UTILITY

Tackling Fare Evasion on Calgary s CTrain System

MINUTES GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

DURING THE NEXT HOUR, about three hundred

Guideway Status Report

Multi Modal Roadway Transportation Impact Fees and Asset Value

Presto Fare Card ibus (Automated Stop Announcements, Cameras) Transit Operating System Replacement

College of Southern Maryland. Hughesville Transportation Study

URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLANNING IN TEHRAN AND THE OUTCOME OF THE IMPLEMENTED BRT LINES

Office of Internal Audit

SERVICE, DESIGN, PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION GUIDELINES

Appendix G.3 Crain & Associates, Peer Review

Transportation Alternatives

Fares Policy In London: Impact on Bus Patronage

Orange County Transportation Impact Fee Update FINAL REPORT

ATTACHMENT A SHUTTLE SERVICE ROUTES

INTRODUCTION TO TBEST. An FDOT Model for Short Range Transit Ridership Forecasting

Bus Priority Measures in Calgary: Past, Present and Future. Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng., Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

5.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

Montgomery County Bus Rapid Transit System Information Technology Needs

2016 Transit Service Review CCT Meeting #2. Calgary Transit April 19, 2016

National Transit Database - NTD

Public Transportation Advertising Throughout San Diego County MTS San Diego Trolley NCTD Coaster NCTD Sprinter

Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type:Informational Report

City of Ottawa Transit Network Planning Project. October ENTRA Technical Report. Excellence in Transportation Planning

30 Years of Smart Growth

Managing the Transit Network A Primer on Key Concepts

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

NATIONAL STUDY OF BRT DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

Doing More with the Same: How the Trinity Railway Express Increased Service without Increasing Costs

Doing a little can accomplish a lot. Proposed Change of Municipal Class Environmental Assessment from Schedule from B to A+

Latest anf Future Development Plans in Helsinki

Passenger Risk Mitigation Strategy Guidelines Province of Alberta (Version 0.5- September 7, 2011)

Congestion Management Systems: A Federal Perspective. 7 Key CMS Components

Transcription:

Bus Rapid Transit Applications Phase II Report

What is Bus Rapid Transit? An enhanced bus system that operates on bus lanes or other transitways in order to combine the flexibility of buses with the efficiency of rail. Operates at faster speeds, provides greater service reliability and increased customer convenience. Uses a combination of advanced technologies, infrastructure and operational investments that provide significantly better service than traditional bus service. Source: Federal Transit Administration

Study Purpose Phase 1 report (Feb. 2010) Discussed BRT in general Summarized previous South Florida BRT studies Phase 2 report Builds on Phase 1 report Profiles 8 U.S. BRT systems Includes BRT Heavy to Lite

Profiled BRT Systems Eugene EmX San Pablo Rapid Las Vegas MAX Los Angeles Metro Rapid Los Angeles Orange Line Kansas City MAX Cleveland HealthLine Boston Silver Line

Agency Statistics

Summary of the 8 BRT Systems Route Lengths 2.4 to 26 miles Dedicated Bus Lanes 6 of the 8 BRTs Transit Signal Priority All 8 BRTs Queue Jumper 3 of the 8 BRTs Fare Collection 4 collect off-board Median Stations 2 of the 8 BRTs Service Frequency Ranges from every 5 to every 12 minutes

Highlights from Interviews Branding In Cleveland, BRT was marketed as rubber-tired rail In L.A., Metro Rapid buses associated with faster service In K.C., riders don t think of the MAX as a bus 2008 - Cleveland Clinic and University Hospitals win naming rights to Cleveland HealthLine

Highlights from Interviews BRT Design BRT design is critical Make route easy to understand High frequency service No need to consult schedule

Wilshire & Ventura Blvd. Metro Rapid Year Started June 2000 Capital Costs $8.2M combined Corridor Length 26 miles Wilshire Blvd. 16 miles Ventura Blvd. Ridership 42,000 per day Wilshire 4,800 per day Ventura Headways Every 3 min; Every 5-7 min

Boston Silver Line Year Started July 2002 Capital Costs $27.3M; $12.1M per mile Corridor Length 2.4 miles (2.2 of bus lane) Ridership 13,000 per day Headways Every 10 minutes

San Pablo Rapid Year Started June 2003 Capital Costs $3.2M; $230K per mile Corridor Length 14 miles mixed traffic Ridership 5,800 per day Headways Every 12 minutes

Las Vegas MAX Year Started June 2004 Capital Costs $20.3M; $2.6M per mile Corridor Length 7.5 miles (4.5 of bus lane) Ridership 7,500 per day Headways Every 12 to 18 minutes

Kansas City MAX Year Started July 2005 Capital Costs $21M; $3.5M per mile Corridor Length 6 miles (3.75 of bus lane) Ridership 6,000 per day Headways Every 10 minutes

Los Angeles Orange Line Year Started October 2005 Capital Costs $304.6M; $21M per mile Corridor Length 14.5 mile busway Ridership 23,900 per day Headways Every 4-5 minutes

Eugene EmX Year Started January 2007 Capital Costs $25M; $6.25M per mile Corridor Length 4 miles (2.5 of bus lane) Ridership 7,200 per day Headways Every 10 minutes

Cleveland HealthLine Year Started August 2008 Capital Costs $197M; $27.7M per mile Corridor Length 7.1 miles (4.4 of bus lane) Ridership 12,000 per day Headways Every 5 minutes

Broward MPO Long Range Transportation Plan Premium Rapid Bus 1,700 to 2,999 daily riders Operates in mixed traffic 10 minute peak frequency Transit signal priority Off-board fare collection Real-time passenger info Articulated low-floor vehicles

Broward MPO Long Range Transportation Plan Premium High Capacity 3,000 or more daily riders Fixed guideway/dedicated lane on at least 50% of project 5 minute peak frequency Transit signal priority Off-board fare collection Real-time passenger info Articulated low-floor vehicles

How do the 8 BRTs measure up? L.A. Metro Rapid Boston Silverline San Pablo Rapid Las Vegas MAX K.C. MAX L.A. Orange Line Eugene EmX Cleveland HealthLine Bus Lane Headway Premium High Capacity Transit Premium Rapid Bus Neither

To get a copy of the report www.nbrti.org

Contact Information Ms. Khalilah Ffrench, P.E. khalilah.ffrench@dot.state.fl.us Mr. Brian Pessaro, AICP pessaro@cutr.usf.edu Ms. Marie-Elsie Dowell, P.E. dowell@pbworld.com