Spectral Band Difference Effects for CrossCalibration in the Solar-Reflective Spectral

Similar documents
How to calculate reflectance and temperature using ASTER data

Spectral Response for DigitalGlobe Earth Imaging Instruments

Research on Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration using Remote Sensing

Passive Remote Sensing of Clouds from Airborne Platforms

Review for Introduction to Remote Sensing: Science Concepts and Technology

Data Processing Flow Chart

Resolutions of Remote Sensing

A remote sensing instrument collects information about an object or phenomenon within the

High Resolution Information from Seven Years of ASTER Data

MODIS IMAGES RESTORATION FOR VNIR BANDS ON FIRE SMOKE AFFECTED AREA

ARM SWS to study cloud drop size within the clear-cloud transition zone

Lectures Remote Sensing

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) and Remote Sensing

Using Remote Sensing Imagery to Evaluate Post-Wildfire Damage in Southern California

STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Beta Review. Suomi NPP Surface Reflectance IP ARP Product

SAMPLE MIDTERM QUESTIONS

Preface. Ko Ko Lwin Division of Spatial Information Science University of Tsukuba 2008

WATER BODY EXTRACTION FROM MULTI SPECTRAL IMAGE BY SPECTRAL PATTERN ANALYSIS

Remote Sensing Satellite Information Sheets Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks

Integrating the Solar Spectrum

Data processing (3) Cloud and Aerosol Imager (CAI)

Lake Monitoring in Wisconsin using Satellite Remote Sensing

Using Remote Sensing to Monitor Soil Carbon Sequestration

Selecting the appropriate band combination for an RGB image using Landsat imagery

Landsat 7 Automatic Cloud Cover Assessment

Radiation Transfer in Environmental Science

Landsat Monitoring our Earth s Condition for over 40 years

APPLICATION OF TERRA/ASTER DATA ON AGRICULTURE LAND MAPPING. Genya SAITO*, Naoki ISHITSUKA*, Yoneharu MATANO**, and Masatane KATO***

D.S. Boyd School of Earth Sciences and Geography, Kingston University, U.K.

The Effect of Droplet Size Distribution on the Determination of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

Proba-V: Earthwatch Mission as part of ESA s Earth Observation Programmes

2.3 Spatial Resolution, Pixel Size, and Scale

SEMI-AUTOMATED CLOUD/SHADOW REMOVAL AND LAND COVER CHANGE DETECTION USING SATELLITE IMAGERY

SLSTR Breakout Summary - Gary Corlett (22/03/2012)

Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission

P.M. Rich, W.A. Hetrick, S.C. Saving Biological Sciences University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045

Solar Radiation Measurement. Bruce W Forgan, WMO RAV Metrology Workshop, Melbourne, Novemberr 2011

The USGS Landsat Big Data Challenge

Remote Sensing. Vandaag. Voordelen Remote Sensing Wat is Remote Sensing? Vier elementen Remote Sensing systeem

CLOUD MASKING AND CLOUD PRODUCTS ROUNDTABLE EXPECTED PARTICIPANTS: ACKERMAN, HALL, WAN, VERMOTE, BARKER, HUETE, BROWN, GORDON, KAUFMAN, SCHAAF, BAUM

Mapping Earth from Space Remote sensing and satellite images. Remote sensing developments from war

2 Absorbing Solar Energy

How Landsat Images are Made

AAFC Medium-Resolution EO Data Activities for Agricultural Risk Assessment

The empirical line method for the atmospheric correction of IKONOS imagery

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Atmospherically Correcting Multispectral Data Using FLAASH 2

16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting. Plymouth, UK February mission: Present status and near future

Design of a High Resolution Multispectral Scanner for Developing Vegetation Indexes

USE OF ALOS DATA FOR MONITORING CORAL REEF BLEACHING PI No 204 Hiroya Yamano 1, Masayuki Tamura 2, Hajime Kayanne 3

Corso di Fisica Te T cnica Ambientale Solar Radiation

Blackbody radiation. Main Laws. Brightness temperature. 1. Concepts of a blackbody and thermodynamical equilibrium.

Information Contents of High Resolution Satellite Images

Reflectance Measurements of Materials Used in the Solar Industry. Selecting the Appropriate Accessories for UV/Vis/NIR Measurements.

LANDSAT 8 Level 1 Product Performance

The use of Earth Observation technology to support the implementation of the Ramsar Convention

THE SPECTRAL DIMENSION IN URBAN LAND COVER MAPPING FROM HIGH - RESOLUTION OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING DATA *

The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods

An Airborne A-Band Spectrometer for Remote Sensing Of Aerosol and Cloud Optical Properties

Optical multi-spectral images: processing and applications

Multiangle cloud remote sensing from

Methods for Monitoring Forest and Land Cover Changes and Unchanged Areas from Long Time Series

VIIRS-CrIS mapping. NWP SAF AAPP VIIRS-CrIS Mapping

Hyperion Data Collection: Performance Assessment and Science Application

Authors: Thierry Phulpin, CNES Lydie Lavanant, Meteo France Claude Camy-Peyret, LPMAA/CNRS. Date: 15 June 2005

Digital Remote Sensing Data Processing Digital Remote Sensing Data Processing and Analysis: An Introduction and Analysis: An Introduction

Evaluation of the Effect of Upper-Level Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Retrievals of Low-Level Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

Digital image processing

INVESTIGA I+D+i 2013/2014

Take away concepts. What is Energy? Solar Energy. EM Radiation. Properties of waves. Solar Radiation Emission and Absorption

Cloud detection and clearing for the MOPITT instrument

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Atmospherically Correcting Hyperspectral Data using FLAASH 2

The Surface Energy Budget

PTYS/ASTR 206 Section 2 Spring 2007 Homework #2 (Page 1/5) NAME: KEY

Earth Observation Sensor Calibration Using A Global Instrumented and Automated Network of Test Sites (GIANTS)

MOD09 (Surface Reflectance) User s Guide

The Sentinel-4/UVN instrument on-board MTG-S

Overview. What is EMR? Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) LA502 Special Studies Remote Sensing

Software requirements * :

3D VISUALIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL WELLS DIRECTIONAL SURVEYS AND INTEGRATION WITH DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM)

Satellite'&'NASA'Data'Intro'

SOLAR RADIATION AND YIELD. Alessandro Massi Pavan

Sky Monitoring Techniques using Thermal Infrared Sensors. sabino piazzolla Optical Communications Group JPL

SPOT Satellite Earth Observation System Presentation to the JACIE Civil Commercial Imagery Evaluation Workshop March 2007

Adaptive HSI Data Processing for Near-Real-time Analysis and Spectral Recovery *

Remote sensing is the collection of data without directly measuring the object it relies on the

Obtaining and Processing MODIS Data

1. Theoretical background

CROP CLASSIFICATION WITH HYPERSPECTRAL DATA OF THE HYMAP SENSOR USING DIFFERENT FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES

Comparison of NOAA's Operational AVHRR Derived Cloud Amount to other Satellite Derived Cloud Climatologies.

Soil degradation monitoring by active and passive remote-sensing means: examples with two degradation processes

Big data in Environmental Remote Sensing Challenges and Chances

Treasure Hunt. Lecture 2 How does Light Interact with the Environment? EMR Principles and Properties. EMR and Remote Sensing

'Developments and benefits of hydrographic surveying using multispectral imagery in the coastal zone

Data Processing Developments at DFD/DLR. Stefanie Holzwarth Martin Bachmann, Rudolf Richter, Martin Habermeyer, Derek Rogge

The contribution of ROSAS automated photometric station to vicarious calibration of PLEIADES PHR1A satellite

ING LA PALMA TECHNICAL NOTE No Investigation of Low Fringing Detectors on the ISIS Spectrograph.

Department of Engineering Enzo Ferrari University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

Validating MOPITT Cloud Detection Techniques with MAS Images

CHAPTER 2 Energy and Earth

Climatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula

Transcription:

Spectral Band Difference Effects for CrossCalibration in the Solar-Reflective Spectral Domain P.M. Teillet, G. Fedosejevs Canada Centre for Remote Sensing K.J Thome University of Arizona Natural Resources Canada Ressources naturelles Workshop on Sensor Intercomparison, 2004-10- 2004-10P.M. Teillet, CEOS G. Fedosejevs and K.J. Thome, CEOS Workshop, Canada

Introduction For quantitative Earth observation applications to make full use of the ever-increasing number of Earth observation satellite systems, data from the various sensors involved must be on a consistent radiometric calibration scale. However, different applications and technology developments in Earth observation typically require different spectral coverage. The result is that relative spectral response functions differ significantly between sensors, even for spectral bands designed to look at the same region of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Study Premise What is the impact of spectral band differences between satellite sensors on cross-calibration (Xcal) based on near-simultaneous imaging of common ground look targets in analogous spectral bands? Given that Landsat-7 ETM+ is well calibrated radiometrically, crosscalibration between the ETM+ and several other sensors was the starting point for the study. With spectral band difference effects (SBDEs) on cross-calibration between ETM+ and other sensors in hand, all other Xcal combinations between sensors can be readily examined (in the Landsat-centric spectral domain).

Previous Studies Teillet et al. (2001): In 6 solar reflective bands for Landsat-7 ETM+ versus Landsat- 5 TM. Trishchenko (Trichtchenko) et al. (2002): In red, near-infrared, and NDVI for NOAA-9 AVHRR versus other NOAA AVHRRs, Terra MODIS, SPOT-4 VGT, and ADEOS-2 GLI. Steven et al. (2003): NDVI for 15 satellite sensors. Rao et al. (2003): ATSR-2 versus MODIS, allowing for SBDEs.

Assumptions Temporal: Images acquired under clear sky conditions on the same day. Spectral: Spectral bands with analogs to the six solar-reflective Landsat-7 ETM+ bands. Spectral bands well characterized prior to launch and unchanged post-launch. Out-of-band response not taken into consideration. Radiometric: Nominal calibration coefficients are being checked. Linear radiometric response over the range of relevant radiances. Differences in radiometric resolution not taken into consideration. Bidirectional reflectance effects not taken into account. Terrain flat and horizontal.

Simulation Methodology Simulate spectral band adjustment factors for Reference and experimental sensors: Start with calibration test site ground spectrum. Use atmospheric radiative transfer code (CAM5S) to compute ρ*ir. Use atmospheric radiative transfer code (CAM5S) to compute ρ*ix. In analogous solar-reflective spectral bands. Calculate band difference factor, Bi = ρ*ir / ρ*ix. For all pair combinations of ETM+; ALI; MODIS; ASTER; MISR. Error in cross-calibration directly proportional to Bi. Simulate spectral band adjustment factors for NDVI: NDVI = (ρ*nir - ρ*red) / (ρ* NIR + ρ*red). (8) BN = (NDVIR / NDVIX). (9) Error in NDVI comparisons directly proportional to BN.

Sensors, Spectral Bands and Ground Targets Satellite Sensors and Analogous Spectral Band Numbers (NIR = near infrared; SWIR = shortwave-infrared) Satellite Sensor Blue Band Green Band Red Band NIR Band SWIR Band I SWIR Band II Landsat-7 ETM+ 1 2 3 4 5 7 Earth Observing 1 ALI 1 2 3 4p 5 7 Terra MODIS 3 4 1 2 6 7 Terra MODIS 10 12 13 16 - - Terra ASTER - 1 2 3 4 6 Terra MISR 1 2 3 4 - - Ground Target Spectra (Analytical Spectral Devices (ASD) Spectrometer Data) Railroad Valley Playa, Nevada (RVPN) Niobrara Grassland, Nebraska (NIOB)

ETM+ Band 2 Analogs Landsat-7 ETM+ B2 EO-1 ALI B2 Terra MODIS B4 Terra MODIS B12 Terra ASTER B1 Terra MISR B2 1.0 Relative Spectral Response 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620 640 Wavelength (nm)

ETM+ Band 5 Analogs 1.0 Landsat-7 ETM+ B5 Terra MODIS B6 EO-1 ALI B5 Terra ASTER B4 Relative Spectral Response 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 Wavelength (nm)

RVPN and NIOB Ground Target Spectra (ASD Data from June 1999) Surface Reflectance 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Wavelength (nm)

RVPN and NIOB Ground Spectra in the Landsat Spectral Regions Band 1 Region Band 2 Region 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 425 465 505 545 Wavelength (nm) Band 4 Region 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 720 800 880 960 Wavelength (nm) 0.1 595 640 685 730 Wavelength (nm) Band 7 Region 0.5 1500 1600 1700 1800 Wavelength (nm) Surface Reflectance 0.2 0.2 545 595 645 Wavelength (nm) Band 5 Region Surface Reflectance 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.4 495 0.5 Surface Reflectance 0.5 Surface Reflectance 0.5 Surface Reflectance Surface Reflectance 0.5 Band 3 Region 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2100 2180 2260 2340 Wavelength (nm) P.M. Teillet, G. Fedosejevs and K.J. Thome, CEOS Workshop, 2004-10

Other Parameters Aerosol Optical Depth at 0.55 mm: 0.05 Aerosol Model: Continental Atmospheric Model: US62 Solar Zenith Angle: 60 degrees Viewing Geometry: Nadir Earth-Sun Distance: 1 AU Elevation (RVPN): 1.425 km Elevation (NIOB): 0.76 km

Results Template for Spectral Band Difference Effects Bi = Ratio TOA Reflectance (Y-axis Sensor) / Ratio TOA Reflectance (X-axis Sensor) Sensor Spectral Bands RailroadValley Playa Niobrara Grassland ETM+ Band 1 Analogs A B C D E F A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ B1 1 1 B: EO-1 ALI B1 1 1 Bi C: Terra ASTER N/A 1 1 D: Terra MODIS B3 1 1 E: Terra MODIS B10 1 1 F: Terra MISR B1 1 1 Difference 0-1 percent, i.e., ratio = {0.990-1.010} Very Good Difference 1-3 percent, i.e., ratio = {0.970-0.989999}, {1.010001-1.030} Good Difference 3-7 percent, i.e, ratio = {0.930-0.969999}, {1.030001-1.070} Poor Difference > 7 percent, i.e, ratio = {0.929999 and below}, {1.070001 and above} Bad

Spectral Band Difference Factor Results for Band 1 and 2 Analogs Sensor Spectral Bands RailroadValley Playa Niobrara Grassland ETM+ Band 1 Analogs A B C D E F A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ B1 1 0.995 1.005 0.990 1.025 1 1.032 0.967 1.076 0.844 B: EO-1 ALI B1 1 1.010 0.995 1.030 1 0.937 1.043 0.818 C: Terra ASTER N/A D: Terra MODIS B3 1 0.985 1.020 1 1.113 0.873 E: Terra MODIS B10 1 1.035 1 0.784 F: Terra MISR B1 1 1 ETM+ Band 2 Analogs A B C D E F A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ B2 1 0.996 1.005 0.990 0.988 0.989 1 1.018 0.982 0.956 1.005 0.966 B: EO-1 ALI B2 1 1.009 0.994 0.992 0.993 1 0.965 0.939 0.987 0.949 C: Terra ASTER B1 1 0.985 0.983 0.984 1 0.974 1.023 0.984 D: Terra MODIS B4 1 0.998 0.999 1 1.051 1.010 E: Terra MODIS B12 1 1.001 1 0.961 F: Terra MISR B2 1 1

Spectral Band Difference Factor Results for Band 3 and 4 Analogs Sensor Spectral Bands RailroadValley Playa Niobrara Grassland ETM+ Band 3 Analogs A B C D E F A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ B3 1 0.998 1.001 0.997 1.016 0.950 1 1.004 0.962 0.983 1.017 1.015 B: EO-1 ALI B3 1 1.003 0.999 1.018 0.952 1 0.958 0.979 1.013 1.011 C: Terra ASTER B2 1 0.996 1.015 0.949 1 1.022 1.057 1.055 D: Terra MODIS B1 1 1.019 0.953 1 1.035 1.033 E: Terra MODIS B13 1 0.935 1 0.998 F: Terra MISR B3 1 1 ETM+ Band 4 Analogs A B C D E F A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ B4 1 0.947 1.037 0.961 0.942 0.948 1 0.911 1.069 0.926 0.906 0.911 B: EO-1 ALI B4p 1 1.095 1.015 0.995 1.001 1 1.173 1.016 0.995 1.000 C: Terra ASTER B3 1 0.927 0.908 0.9 1 0.866 0.848 0.852 D: Terra MODIS B2 1 0.980 0.986 1 0.978 0.984 E: Terra MODIS B16 1 1.006 1 1.006 F: Terra MISR B4 1 1

Spectral Band Difference Factor Results for Band 5 and 7 Analogs Sensor Spectral Bands RailroadValley Playa Niobrara Grassland ETM+ Band 5 Analogs A B C D E F A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ B5 1 0.989 0.976 0.972 1 0.992 0.931 0.920 B: EO-1 ALI B5 1 0.987 0.983 1 0.939 0.927 C: Terra ASTER B4 1 0.996 1 0.988 D: Terra MODIS B6 1 1 E: Terra MODIS N/A F: Terra MISR N/A ETM+ Band 7 Analogs A B C D E F A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ B7 1 0.957 0.938 0.795 1 0.947 0.804 0.846 B: EO-1 ALI B7 1 0.980 0.831 1 0.849 0.893 C: Terra ASTER B6 1 0.848 1 1.052 D: Terra MODIS B7 1 1 E: Terra MODIS N/A F: Terra MISR N/A

Spectral Band Difference Factor Results for NDVI Analogs Sensor Niobrara Grassland ETM+ NDVI Analogs A B C D E F A: Landsat-7 ETM+ 1 1.068 0.923 1.080 1.080 1.076 B: EO-1 ALI 1 0.864 1.011 1.011 1.007 C: Terra ASTER 1 1.170 1.170 1.166 D: Terra MODIS B1B2 1 1.000 0.996 E: Terra MODIS B13B16 1 0.996 F: Terra MISR 1

Results: SBDEs on Cross Calibration (Xcal): Test Site Comparison Without corrections for spectral band difference effects: The RVPN calibration site is less susceptible to SBDEs than the NIOB site in almost all sensor Xcal combinations examined. For the NIOB site and for the sensors involved, with few exceptions, the spectral content of the scene must be known for accurate cross-calibration based on near-simultaneous imaging.

Results SBDEs on Cross Calibration (Xcal): Spectral Region Comparisons Without corrections for spectral band difference effects: Green is the optimum spectral region for RVPN in that 2/3 of the Xcal combinations are very good and the other 1/3 are all good. The poorest spectral region overall is the NIR for both test sites. For the NIOB site, there are no spectral regions that can be considered very good and only the green and red spectral regions have more than a few good Xcal combinations. For the RVPN site, the ETM+ band 7 analog spectral region is also to be avoided in the absence of SBDE corrections.

Results SBDEs on Cross Calibration (Xcal): Sensor Combination Comparisons Without corrections for spectral band difference effects: Sensor Xcal combinations involving ETM+, ALI, ASTER and one MODIS band set (bands 3, 4, and 1) are very good in the blue, green and red spectral regions for RVPN (the one exception is the band 2 analog band combination of ASTER band 1 and MODIS band 4 where B i = 0.985). Sensor Xcal combinations involving MISR are the most susceptible to SBDEs, with generally poor results. There are no sensor Xcal combinations for which the entire Landsat solar-reflective spectral domain yields good results in the absence of SBDE corrections.

Results SBDEs on: NDVI Comparisons Without corrections for spectral band difference effects: There are a few very good cases but, overall, NDVI is highly susceptible to SBDEs, with a percent root mean square difference in BN from unity of 9.4 % across the set of 15 comparisons.

Concluding Remarks (1/2) It is clear from the results that, except for a limited number of cases, sound sensor cross-calibration using common ground targets requires that the spectral characteristics of the common ground look targets used be known. Low-cost Xcal methodologies that seek to complement the more accurate calibrations from costly field campaigns should somehow take SBDEs into account.

Concluding Remarks (2/2) Spectral data and tools recommended to facilitate cross-calibration between satellite sensors: On-line central repository of: Relative spectral response profiles for as many Earth observation sensors as possible. Well-documented target spectra from surface measurements at key calibration test sites. Tools for easy transformations between different wavelength grids to facilitate comparisons. Coordinate central repositories and activities with the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV).

Work in Progress to Extend Study Xcal combinations of 17 Earth observation satellites: ETM+ TM AVNIR ALI ASTER HRG Ikonos QuickBird AVHRR VGT ATSR-2 MODIS GLI MISR SeaWiFS OCTS MERIS Scene spectral content: 11 ground targets: Unity reflectance Snow (CAM5S) Railroad Valley playa Nevada Dry sand (CAM5S) Newell County rangeland Alberta Bright vegetation (CAM5S) South Dakota 3M grass site Niobrara grassland site Black spruce Clear water (CAM5S) Zero reflectance Scene spectral content: Examining role of: Different solar zenith angles Atmospheric models Aerosol optical depths Landsat-centric spectral domain.

Contact Information Contact : Dr. Philippe M. Teillet Senior Research Scientist In Situ Measurement Development Section Canada Centre for Remote Sensing 588 Booth Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0Y7 phil.teillet@ccrs.nrcan.gc.ca www.ccrs.nrcan.gc.ca

Basic Equations for Raw Data in Solar Reflective Spectral Band i The image quantized level Qi (in counts) is related to TOA radiance Li* (in Watts/(m 2 sr µm)) in spectral band i by Qi = Gi L*i + Qoi, (1) such that bias-corrected image values are given by ΔQi = Qi - Qoi ΔQi = Gi L*i ΔQi = Gi ρ*i Eoi cosθ / (π ds 2 ). (2) where Gi = sensor responsivity (in counts per unit radiance), ρ*i = TOA reflectance, Qoi = zero-radiance bias (in counts), Eoi = exo-atmospheric solar irradiance (in W/(m 2 µm)), θ = solar zenith angle, ds = the Earth-Sun distance in Astronomical Units.

Cross-Calibration and Spectral Band Difference Effect (SBDE) Know All But Bi The combination of equation (2) for image data from reference sensor ( R ) and another sensor ( X ) yields ΔQiXA = (GiX / GiR) ΔQiR = Mi ΔQiR, (3) where Mi is the slope that characterises ΔQiX as a function of ΔQiR. ΔQiXA = Ai ΔQiX. (4) Ai = Bi (Eoi cosθ) R / (Eoi cosθ) X, (5) Bi = ρ*ir / ρ*ix. (6) Ai adjusts other sensor image data for illumination and spectral band difference effects, where Bi is a spectral band difference adjustment factor. The other sensor s updated responsivity GiX is then given in spectral band i by GiX = Mi GiR in counts/(watts/(m 2 sr µm)). (7) Thus, near-simultaneous data pairs make it possible to use well-calibrated reference sensor image data to update the radiometric calibration of another sensor. GiX Assumed Unknown So Don t Know ρ*ix