Public-Private Partnerships (P3) and the Illinois Waterway P3 Demonstration Project

Similar documents
Civil Works - FY 2015 CROmnibus & FY 2016 Budget

Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

Presentation for SAME Industry Day

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

How to Become a Navy Engineer For $78,000 in USD

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

The Inland Waterways Trust Fund

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

April 17, 2015 SUMMARY OF SUBJECT MATTER

USACE Asset Management Program

Facing an Uncertain Future: Increasing Resilience at Marinas and Harbors. Recreational Boating Educational Conference December 11, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress of the United States of America

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas

Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study

Coastal Restoration Spending in Louisiana Economic Impact Analysis

Oklahoma Governor s Water Conference

Failing Coastal Wood Infrastructure on the Great Lakes

Subactivity: Habitat Conservation Program Element: National Wetlands Inventory

New Orleans Hurricane Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Tour March 23 24, 2012

US Army Corps of Engineers. Vision Statement. Be the premier stewards of entrusted hydropower resources

The Army Corps of Engineers and the Flood Risk Challenge

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Society of American Military Engineers Omaha District

ROLE OF THE MODELING, MAPPING, AND CONSEQUENCES PRODUCTION CENTER

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Gulf Intracoastal Waterway

Integrated Water Resources Science and Services. National Water Center

Aligning Natural and Built Infrastructure for

Release of EC USACE Process for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Levee System Evaluation. Frequently Asked Questions

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

Aging Infrastructure. Construction Insider. XL Group Insurance

2013 Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) Status Report and Update

This paper provides a concise description of

Public Law and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs

Restore Americas Estuaries 5 th National Conference

Oakwood Beach Storm Damage Prevention Project NJDEP-Bureau of Coastal Engineering Glenn Golden, Project Manager U.S. Army Corps Civil Works Programs

South Atlantic Division Industry Day US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

FEMA s Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Congress March 15, Federal Emergency Management Agency

2015 SAME Small Business Conference and Industry Day April 2015

River Restoration Activities in the Rio Grande Canalization Flood Control Project. Upper Rio Grande Citizens Forum Elizabeth Verdecchia July 19, 2012

United States Postal Service Climate Change Adaptation Plan

ESRI_UC_2015_No843_Integrating Flood Risk Management and Salmon Habitat Restoration_CampbellSW

US Army Corps of Engineers. New Orleans District 2011 Flood Response

USACE Asset Management Update & the FY15 O&M Budget

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT

Managing Our Water Retention Systems

Inland Marine Transportation System Capital Investment Strategy

Capital Improvement Program: Public Input and the Need for a Multi-year Plan

How the Chicago District, US Army Corps of Engineers Conducts Project Management 20 November 2013

Bob Ivarson, PE, D.WRE. Sustainable Water Technologies Business Conference. June 17, 2014

Water Resource Issues in the 110 th Congress

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION: A DATA WAREHOUSE FOR MEASURING PERFORMANCE WITHIN THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DIVISION

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

Submission by the United States of America to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Communication of U.S. Adaptation Priorities May 29, 2015

Chapter 10 Corn Futures

Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Study

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

International Commission On Large Dams Environment August A Viewpoint from the International Commission on Large Dams

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Final NPS Alternative Transportation Program Strategic Action Plan,

Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System

RESUME Lee A. Knuppel, P.E.

A Career In CIVIL ENGINEERING: Improving the Quality of Life

Department-wide Systems and Capital Investment Program

SAME Mobile Post Industry Day

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN COHASSET HARBOR COHASSET AND SCITUATE, MASSACHUSETTS

Kansas City s Overflow Control Program

Muddy River Restoration Project Maintenance and Management Oversight Committee 68 Harvard Street Brookline, Massachusetts

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

Potential Impacts of Hydrofracturing on Dam & Levee Safety

MAINTAINING READINESS THROUGH FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY

Everglades Restoration: Federal Funding and Implementation Progress

How To Improve The Health Of The Corps

Eric D. (Ric) Hines, PE February 2012 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Appendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures

Performance Management Guidelines and Considerations

APPENDIX 9-1 Project 1: City of Lompoc, Lompoc Valley Leak Detection and Repair Project

Tokyo, Japan. William L. Carwile, III FEMA Associate Administrator Response and Recovery. Most catastrophic natural disaster in United States in the

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

New York Sea Grant Strategic Plan

SSPEED Center Phase III: Developing a Houston- Galveston Area Protection System (H-GAPS)

Applying Continuous Improvement in Government Lean Leadership in Action

Section 19. Basin-wide Mitigation Action Plans

CECW-CP 21 June 16. No. 1 EC

GAO FEDERAL REAL PROPERTY. Corps of Engineers Needs to Improve the Reliability of Its Real Property Disposal Data

REVIEW PLAN For FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FOR DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVISA FORK BASIN DICKENSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA SECTION 202 NONSTRUCTURAL

US Army Corps of Engineers

Sea Level Change. Miami-Dade Sea Level Rise Task Force

Multiyear Implementation and Expenditure Plan

OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT FY 2016 AML ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION PROPOSAL: A COMPONENT OF THE PRESIDENT S POWER+ PLAN

Asset Management Performance Report (Asset Management Plan Phase 1)

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS

BIRMINGHAM DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXAMINATION MATTER L: CLIMATE CHANGE AND FLOOD RISK STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Rehabilitation of Locks on the Kentucky River

The Mississippi River & Tributaries Project

Transcription:

Public-Private Partnerships (P3) and the Illinois Waterway P3 Demonstration Project U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Rock Island District Hank DeHaan October 28, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers

Civil Works Infrastructure Challenges Infrastructure Investment = Global Challenge Corps Civil Works Portfolio: 3,000+ Operational Projects, with Replacement Value of ~$268B Corps Civil Works Asset Classes are Diverse Flood & Coastal Storm Damage Coastal and Inland Harbors Inland Waterways Hydropower Dam & Levee Safety Programs Water Storage Aquatic Ecosystems Water-Based Recreation Demands for CW Infrastructure Maintenance, Operations, and Capital Investment are Expanding Civil Works New Construction Backlog $ 60B ASCE: Dams, Levees, Waterways = D $140B CW Infrastructure Systems Aging, Experiencing Negative Performance Trends Across Portfolio (Serviced by ~$4.6B Annual Budget Nationally.) 2

3

Background Upper Mississippi River Navigation System Navigation System infrastructure largely constructed in 1930s (37 Locks and Dams, 1,200 river miles), and is past design life O&M budget is stagnant nationally Over $1.2 billion budgeted, but unfunded for Upper Mississippi Navigation maintenance needs Aging infrastructure is experiencing significant deterioration Reliability of the system is decreasing and risks to users/shippers are increasing Negatively impacting commerce with service interruptions 4

5

Alternative Financing and Public-Private Partnerships (P3) Innovation Increased total investment for national water resources infrastructure Accelerate delivery to speed up public benefits. WRRDA 2014 Public-Private Partnerships Contributed Funds Divestiture Decrease backlog of authorized critical water infrastructure projects. Streamline and improve processes for contributed funds, project approvals, divestiture. Reduce life cycle costs

WRRDA 2014 Section 5014 Public-Private Partnership (P3) Pilot Program Program to evaluate effectiveness and efficiency of allowing non-federal pilot applicants to carry out authorized water resources development projects 7

WRRDA 2014 Section 5014 Public-Private Partnership (P3) Pilot Program Major Program Components 5-year program to identify 15 authorized water resources projects for private participation Program allows non-federal pilot applicants to enter into partnership on authorized water resources development projects Implements process to evaluate cost effectiveness and project delivery efficiency Viable projects include: Channel improvement, inland navigation, flood damage reduction, aquatic ecosystem restoration, hurricane and storm damage reduction Agreement is executed detailing project financing, planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance 8

WRRDA 2014 Section 5014 Public-Private Partnership (P3) Pilot Program Major P3 Efforts Underway Draft Implementation Guidance for P3 Pilot Program under review P3 Vertical Teams forming and meeting regularly Initial P3 Demonstration Projects being conceptually developed Development of Illinois Waterway (IWW) P3 Demonstration Project Project structures and funding mechanisms to finance P3 projects being explored Identification of process/authority/legal hurdles to IWW P3 implementation 9

Demo Project Screening & Structuring Screening process Structure 10

Public-Private Partnership Illinois Waterway P3 Project IWW P3 Demonstration Project Exploring potential for P3 Pilot Program (WRRDA 2014) to assist in addressing aging navigation infrastructure Help address Federal maintenance backlog Provide alternative funding sources to address maintenance needs Speed up repairs and upgrades to aging lock and dams (reset system in 7-10 years) Greatly improve navigation system reliability (>50% vessels experienced delays on IWW in 2014) Reduce risks to users/shippers and improve the economic viability of the nation 11

Public-Private Partnership IWW P3 Project Proposed IWW P3 Demonstration Project Examining ways to address maintenance backlog at eight locks and dams on the IWW (Value = LaGrange: 26M tons/$10b shipped in 2014) Proposed work: Ranges from addressing maintenance requirements to 2 new 1,200-foot locks Examining opportunities to plan, design, construct, operate, and maintain Potential Benefits: Accelerate maintenance efforts, reduce costs, reduce delays and risks Preliminary cost estimate: $300M - >$1B (depending on magnitude of effort) Potential funding mechanisms: User fees, tonnage fees, State financing, Federal funds, etc. Non-Fed partner: Proposing State regional authority 12

P3 Challenges Public-Private Partnership IWW P3 Project Federal Payment Mechanisms Inability to make commitments on future appropriations Revenue Generation New authority is needed to allow for a project revenue stream Budgetability Lacks full alignment with prioritization of projects within current budget policy (BCR) Non-Federal Partner A lead non-federal partner is needed for this effort Program Authorization No authorization/funding to move forward with P3 pilot project at this time 13

Public-Private Partnership IWW P3 Project Demonstration Project Status Meeting regularly with partners, stakeholders, and decision makers to conceptually discuss/evaluate IWW demonstration project structure, needs and challenges USACE sharing navigation information to inform P3 process Draft P3 Program Implementation Guidance being reviewed at ASA and OMB DRAFT IWW P3 proposal being developed by the Illinois Soybean Association (ISA), completing economic analysis as part of this effort IWW P3 group working with Illinois to establish State involvement Working with industry partners to get input/feedback on funding mechanisms and risk buy down (business models) Coordination gaining momentum with Midwest State partners and stakeholders 14

Way Ahead Public-Private Partnership IWW P3 Project Continue to work with partners, stakeholders and senior decision makers to develop and implement the IWW P3 Demonstration Project IWW P3 Team (MVR, MVD, IWR, ISA, and others) meets regularly to advance the effort Identify key implementation hurdles and work with stakeholders and leaders to advance solutions Next steps (by December): Further refine and communicate IWW P3 project, Meet with Illinois to establish non-federal partner, ISA completes economic analysis, Build stakeholder coalition Potential for P3 Federal authority and funding in FY17 15

Closing Thoughts Public-Private Partnership IWW P3 Project A Serious Problem: Civil Works infrastructure deterioration and risks are growing Partnering: The Corps cannot solve this national issue alone Potential Solution: P3 is a tool being explored with stakeholders to leverage alternative financing and project delivery mechanisms Demo Projects & Challenges: Demonstration projects are being developed to examine P3 structures, identify implementation challenges and develop solutions Benefits: IWW P3 would accelerate inland navigation maintenance efforts, reduce costs, reduce delays and risks to users; improving the economic viability of the nation Next Steps: Continue to work closely with partners to advance the IWW P3 16