Class Topics & Objectives. Bearings & Substructures. EGCE 406: Bridge Design. Load Transfer. Components of Bridge.

Similar documents
Introduction to LRFD, Loads and Loads Distribution

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

3.2 DEFINITIONS, cont. Revise or add the following definitions::

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

Chapter 12 LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS NDOT STRUCTURES MANUAL

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

Steel Bridge Design Handbook

LRFD Bridge Design. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Loading and General Information

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

Long-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Table of Contents. July

CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS - SEISMIC ISOLATION BEARINGS

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

CHAPTER 13 CONCRETE COLUMNS

STRUCTURAL FORENSIC INVESTIGATION REPORT

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES PART V SEISMIC DESIGN

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1

Deflections. Question: What are Structural Deflections?

Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

DISTRIBUTION OF LOADSON PILE GROUPS

BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS APRIL 2000 SECTION 14 - BEARINGS

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

Wang, L., Gong, C. "Abutments and Retaining Structures." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

Hunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

June 2007 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.0 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.1 GENERAL

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

The unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity.

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.

2.0 External and Internal Forces act on structures

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

1,045 m length of the Deh Cho Bridge

(1) Minami Nagamachi and Naka Nagamachi viaducts between Shiraishi Zao and Sendai Stations on the Tohoku Shinkansen line

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP

Steel and composite bridges in Germany State of the Art

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

ASSESSMENT AND PROPOSED STRUCTURAL REPAIR STRATEGIES FOR BRIDGE PIERS IN TAIWAN DAMAGED BY THE JI-JI EARTHQUAKE ABSTRACT

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges

ARCHITECTURE. Asst. Prof. Meltem VATAN KAPTAN

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift

Technical handbook Panel Anchoring System

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

Structural Performance of Highway Bridges under Given Foundation Settlements

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

Aluminium systems profile selection

Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures

Steel joists and joist girders are

Overhang Bracket Loading. Deck Issues: Design Perspective

DESIGN: (SUBSTRUCTURES, SPECIAL STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS) PART 12 BD 31/01 THE DESIGN OF BURIED CONCRETE BOX AND PORTAL FRAME STRUCTURES SUMMARY

Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites

200 Questions and Answers on Practical Civil Engineering Works. Vincent T. H. CHU

Introduction to Beam. Area Moments of Inertia, Deflection, and Volumes of Beams

Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments

Vol. II, Chapter. 4 HIGWAY STRUCTURES DESIGN HANDBOOK

SEISMIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems

Statics of Structural Supports

Technical Assignment 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.2 Advantages and Types of Prestressing

Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs. Bridge Engineering 1

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013

Chapter 7 Substructure Design General Substructure Considerations Foundation Design Process

Underpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles

High Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED BRIDGE MODEL

Truss. are both simple and A Matsuo Example continuous trusses. The

Green Thread Product Data

[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]

BRIDGE REHABILITATION TECHNIQUES

H 300 DESIGN LOADS AND DISTRIBUTION OF LOADS

INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE.

Index Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12)

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

How To Design A Post Tensioned Deck For A Building

Transcription:

EGCE 406: Bridge Design Bearings & Substructures Class Topics & Objectives Topics Bridge Bearing Bridge Substructures Loads on Substructure Abutment Piers Objective Students can identify and describe types of bridge bearings Students can describe the loads involved in the design of substructures. Students can describe pros and cons for each type of substructure Parts of the topics discussed in this class can be found in: Chapter 1-4 Praveen Chompreda Mahidol University 1 First Semester, 2010 2 Load Transfer Loads on the bridge must find a way to the ground Components of Bridge Superstructure Roadway Deck Live Load on Bridge Deck Slab Superstructure Girder Superstructure Substructure Abutment Abutment Superstructure Substructure Bearing Superstructure Roadway Deck Ground Foundation (Footing/ Pile) Substructure (Abutment/ Pier) Substructure Pier Abutment 3 4

Bearing Role of Bearing Forces and Movements Types Selection of Bearing 5 Bearing Bearing is a structural device positioned between bridge superstructure and substructure Roles of Bearing: Transmit load from superstructure to substructure Accommodate relative movements between superstructure and substructure Types: Fixed Bearing Rotational movement only Expansion Bearing Rotational movement Translational movement 6 Forces and Movements on Bearing Types of Bearing Forces on Bearing Vertical forces - from dead loads and live load Horizontal forces - from wind, earthquake Movements on Bearing Horizontal translation caused by creep, shrinkage, and thermal expansions. Rotations caused by traffic, construction tolerances, and uneven settlement of foundations Rocker Bearing Pin Bearing Roller Bearing Slider Bearing Elastomeric Bearing Curved Bearing Pot Bearing Disk Bearing If no movement is allowed, then the bearing must be able to resist the force due to the deformation 7 8

Rocker/ Pin/ Roller Bearing Rocker/ Pin/ Roller Bearing Mostly used for steel beams Can carry large loads Requires high clearance Corrosion can be a problem need regular inspections high maintenance cost Source: www.mageba.ch (2010) 9 10 Elastomeric Bearing Elastomeric Bearing with Slider Made up of natural or synthetic rubber Very flexible in shear but very stiff against volumetric change Can accommodate both rotational and translational movements through the deformation of pad Steel or fiberglass is typically used to reinforced the pad in alternate layers to prevent it from bulging under high load, allowing it to resist higher loads 11 Steel slider with Teflon (PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene) coated surfaces may be used in combination with elastomeric bearing to allow for more translations 12

Elastomeric Bearing Curved Bearing Source: www.mageba.ch (2010) Curved Surface allows for rotation Cylindrical Surface can rotate only about 1 axis Spherical Surface can rotate about any axes Slider surface coated with Teflon must be used to allow for the translation Can resist relatively large loads 13 14 Curved Bearing Pot Bearing Source: www.mageba.ch (2010) Pot bearing consists of steel container ( Pot ) with elastomeric pad inside Can resist much larger loads than conventional elastomeric bearing Rotation is accommodated by deformation of the elastomer Sliding surface is used to allow for translation 15 16

Pot Bearing Disk Bearing Source: www.mageba.ch (2010) Hard elastomeric disk is used with metal key inside Metal key is used to resist horizontal loads Rotation is accommodated by deformation of the elastomer Sliding surface is used to allow for translations 17 18 Which type of bearing should I use? Consider the following factors when selecting a bearing to use: Vertical and Horizontal Loads Translational and Rotational Movements Available Clearance (footprint/ height) Environment (corrosion/ temperature range) Initial Cost Maintenance Cost Availability Owner s Preference Bearing Capacity of Common Bearings 19 20

Types of Substructures Substructures Abutment-Type Substructures Abutment and Retaining Walls Anchored Walls Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Prefabricated Modular Walls Pier-Type Substructures Concrete Pier Steel Pier Composite Steel & Concrete Pier 21 22 Types of Substructures Abutment & Pier Loads on Substructures Abutment Pier Loads from Superstructure Loads on Substructure Load Combinations 23 24

Loads from Superstructure Vertical Loads from Superstructures Dead Load of Structural and Nonstructural Components (DC) Dead Load of Wearing Surface (DW) Live Load (LL) and Impact (IM) Pedestrian Live Load (PL) Horizontal Loads from Superstructures Wind Load on Structures (WS) Wind Load on Live Load (WL) Earthquake Load (EQ) Vehicular Braking Force (BR), Centrifugal Force (CE), and Collision Force (CT) Creep (CR), Shrinkage (SH), Friction (FR), and Temperature (TG/ TU) 25 Loads on Substructures Vertical load acting on substructure Dead Load of Structural and Nonstructural Components (DC) Vertical Pressure from Dead Load of Earth Fill (EV) Horizontal loads acting on substructure Water Load and Stream Pressure (WA) Ice Load (IC) Wind Load on Structure (WS) Earthquake Load (EQ) Vehicular Collision Force (CT), Vessel Collision Force (CV) Horizontal Earth Pressure Load (EH) Earth Surcharge Load (ES) Live Load Surcharge (LS) 26 Wind Loads (WS, WL) WL WS (on Superstructure) WS (on Substructure) Vehicle Collision Forces (CT) Unless protected, abutments and piers located within a distance of 30.0 FT to the edge of roadway, or within a distance of 50.0 FT to the centerline of a railway track, shall be designed for an equivalent static force of 400 KIP, which is assumed to act in any direction in a horizontal plane, at a distance of 4.0 FT above ground. CT need not be considered for structures which are protected by: An embankment A structurally independent, crashworthy groundmounted 54.0-IN high barrier, located within 10.0 FT from the component being protected; Or a 42.0-IN high barrier located at more than 10.0 FT from the component being protected 27 28

Load Combinations Load Combinations Source: AASHTO (2002) 29 Source: AASHTO (2002) 30 Design of Abutment and Retaining Substructures Roles and Types Failure Limit States Loads on Abutment Roles and Types Roles of Abutment Provide support for bridge superstructure at the bridge ends Connect the bridge with the approach roadway Retain the roadway material (soil & rock) from the bridge span Types Abutment Open End Abutment Close End Abutment Retaining Structures Gravity Wall Cantilever Wall Anchored Walls Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Prefabricated Modular Walls 31 32

Types of Abutment Types of Abutment Open End Abutment Open End Abutment Close End Abutment 33 34 Types of Abutment Types of Abutment Close End Abutment Open End Abutment Close End Abutment Has some slopes between abutment wall and roadway/ water channel below Requires relatively larger space Requires longer bridge span Allow for some roadway widening below bridge More economical Has no slopes between abutment wall and roadway/ water channel below Requires relatively smaller space (good for urban areas) Requires shorter bridge span No allowance for future widening More expensive to construct 35 36

Types of Retaining Structures Types of Retaining Structures Anchored Walls 37 38 Types of Retaining Structures Types of Retaining Structures Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls 39 40

Types of Retaining Structures Failure Limit States Abutment structures must be checked for: Global Stability Failure: Bearing Capacity (a) Overturning (b) Sliding Failure (c) Deep Seated Failure (d) Local Strength Failures: Compression Failure Bending Moment Failure Shear Deflection Etc 41 42 Strength Limit States (Global) Loads on Abutment from Superstructure (a) (b) Vertical loads from superstructures Dead Load of Structural and Nonstructural Components (DC) Dead Load of Wearing Surface (DW) Live Load (LL) and Impact (IM) Pedestrian Live Load (PL) Horizontal loads from superstructures Wind Load on Structures (WS) (c) (d) Wind Load on Live Load (WL) Earthquake Load (EQ) Vehicular Braking Force (BR), Centrifugal Force (CE), and Collision Force (CT) T N 43 Creep (CR), Shrinkage (SH), Friction (FR), and Temperature (TG/ TU) 44

Loads on Abutment Itself Vertical loads acting on substructure Dead Load of Structural and Nonstructural Components (DC) Vertical Pressure from Dead Load of Earth Fill (EV) Loads on Abutment Horizontal loads acting on substructure Water Load and Stream Pressure (WA) Ice Load (IC) Earthquake Load (EQ) Vehicular Collision Force (CT), Vessel Collision Force (CV) Horizontal Earth Pressure Load (EH) Earth Surcharge Load (ES) Live Load Surcharge (LS) 45 46 Earth Pressure (EH, ES, LS and DD) Earth pressure is a function of the: Type and unit weight of earth Water content Soil creep characteristics Degree of compaction Location of groundwater table Earth-structure interaction Amount of surcharge Earthquake effects Earth Pressure (EH) Basic earth pressure, p p h s k γ gz k h = coefficient of lateral earth pressure At-rest pressure coefficient, Ko Active pressure coefficient, Ka Passive pressure coefficient, Kp γ s = unit weight of soil z = depth below the surface of earth Force resultant is assumed to act at 0.4H from the base of wall 47 48

Earth Pressure (EH) Surcharge Loads (ES and LS) Constant horizontal earth pressure due to surcharge load is added to the basic earth pressure p kq s s k s = coefficient of earth pressure due to surcharge At-rest pressure coefficient, Ko Active pressure coefficient, Ka q s = uniform surcharge applied to the upper surface of the active earth wedge Source: AASHTO (2002) 49 50 Loads on Abutment Live Load from Superstructure Loads on Abutment Earth Pressure and Surcharge Loads Concrete Approach slab H 51 Passive pressure is O ignored 52

Loads on Abutment Loads on Abutment Earth Pressure and Surcharge Loads Earth Pressure: Ph = ½ (EFP h )H 2 Pv = ½ (EFP v )H 2 Location at 0.4H instead of 1/3 EFP = Equivalent Fluid Pressure Concrete Approach slab H Earth Pressure and Surcharge Loads Pressures generated by the Live Load and Dead Load Surcharges: H L = Kw L H H D = Kw D H V L = w L (heel width) V D = w D (heel width) w L = h eq w D = slab thickness c V L V D Live load approach Concrete Approach slab H D W L W D H L H P v P v P h P h 0.5H 0.4H 0.4H Passive pressure is O ignored 53 Passive pressure is O ignored 54 Loads on Abutment Loads on Abutment Earth Pressure and Surcharge Loads Earth Pressure and Surcharge Loads Vertical Loads at the Bearing: DL and LL Horizontal Loads: BR (braking) CR (creep) SH (shrinkage) TU (temperature) BR CR+SH+TU DL LL V L V D Live load approach Concrete Approach slab H D W L W D H L H Dead Load of the abutment BR CR+SH+TU DL LL 3 V L V D 4 Live load approach Concrete Approach slab H D W L W D H L H P v P h 0.5H 2 P v P h 0.5H 0.4H 0.4H Passive pressure is O ignored 55 Passive pressure is O ignored 1 56

Design of Pier Substructures Types Failure Limit States Loads Design of RC Columns Piers Pier substructures may be designed using design procedures of columns Steel Concrete Composite 57 58 Piers Reinforced Concrete Piers Piers Steel Truss Pier Source: www.wikipedia.org (2005) 59 Source: www.wikipedia.org (2005) 60

Piers Pier Shapes Piers may be Solid usually for short piers Hollow usually for taller piers to save weight (need large moment of inertia to prevent buckling and provide larger moment capacity for lateral loads) Pier Types Solid Wall Pier Single Pier (Hammer Head Type) Rigid Frame 61 62 Piers Pier Types Steel Bridges 63 64

Pier Types Steel Bridges Pier Types Concrete Bridges Rigid Frame Pier 65 66 Pier Types Concrete Bridges Pier Selection Factors that influences the selection of pier types includes: Types of superstructures Steel or Concrete Widths Location Over land or water Hydraulics Height (tall piers may be hollow to reduce weight) Space available Aesthetics 67 68

Pier Selection Guidelines Strength Limit States Pier structures must be checked for: Global Stability Failure: Overturning Local Strength Failures: Compression Failure Bending Moment Failure Shear Deflection 69 70 Loads on Piers from Superstructure Vertical loads from superstructures Dead Load of Structural and Nonstructural Components (DC) Dead Load of Wearing Surface (DW) Live Load (LL) and Impact (IM) Pedestrian Live Load (PL) Horizontal loads from superstructures Wind Load on Structures (WS) Wind Load on Live Load (WL) Earthquake Load (EQ) Vehicular Braking Force (BR), Centrifugal Force (CE), and Collision Force (CT) Creep (CR), Shrinkage (SH), Friction (FR), and Temperature (TG/ TU) 71 Loads on Piers Itself Vertical load acting on substructure Dead Load of Structural and Nonstructural Components (DC) Horizontal loads acting on substructure Water Load and Stream Pressure (WA) Ice Load (IC) Wind Load on Structure (WS) Earthquake Load (EQ) Vehicular Collision Force (CT), Vessel Collision Force (CV) 72

Pier Load Analysis for Wind Loads Reinforced Concrete Columns Pure Axial (Ø=0.75) WL Sprial φp φ0.85p φ0.85 0.85 f ' ( A A ) A f n 0 c g st st y WS (on Superstructure) Tie φp φ0.80p φ0.80 0.85 f ' ( A A ) A f n 0 c g st st y Pure Flexure (beam) (Ø=0.90 for RC) WS (on Substructure) φmn φa ( sfy d a /2) Combined Axial and Flexure in on direction Interaction Diagram Investigate High Compressive Force Investigate High Bending (Low Compression) 73 74 Reinforced Concrete Columns Axial Loads + Bending Moment Spiral vs. Tie columns Source: Wang et. al. (2006) 75 76

Reinforced Concrete Columns Biaxial Bending + Axial For high axial load Factored Axial Resistance when has eccentricity only in Y direction For low axial load P 0.1 φf ' A u c g 1 1 1 1 P P P P M M rxy rx ry ux rx P 0.1 φf ' A u c g Muy 1.0 M ry 0 Factored Axial Resistance when has eccentricity only in X direction Factored Applied Moment in X and Y direction Factored Nominal Moment Capacity in X and Y direction For slender columns, must also determine the secondary moment due to P- Effect 77