Limit of detection, limit of quantification and limit of blank

Similar documents
Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

USING CLSI GUIDELINES TO PERFORM METHOD EVALUATION STUDIES IN YOUR LABORATORY

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

Signal, Noise, and Detection Limits in Mass Spectrometry

GUIDELINES FOR THE VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ACTIVE CONSTITUENT, AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICAL PRODUCTS.

Guide to Method Validation for Quantitative Analysis in Chemical Testing Laboratories

Contents. Abstract...i. Committee Membership... iii. Foreword... vii. 1 Scope...1

Evaluating Laboratory Data. Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

DECISION LIMITS FOR THE CONFIRMATORY QUANTIFICATION OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES

Methods verification. Transfer of validated methods into laboratories working routine. Dr. Manuela Schulze 1

To avoid potential inspection

Procedure for Writing Technical Procedures

Sample Analysis Design Step 2 Calibration/Standard Preparation Choice of calibration method dependent upon several factors:

Magruder Statistics & Data Analysis

Terms concerned with internal quality control procedures

Assay Migration Studies for In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff

Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials

ISO How to Meet. Requirements for Method Verification. Prepared by:

Quality Assurance/Quality Control in Acid Deposition Monitoring

Glossary of Terms for Quality Assurance and Good Laboratory Practices

Method Validation/Verification. CAP/CLIA regulated methods at Texas Department of State Health Services Laboratory

Content Sheet 7-1: Overview of Quality Control for Quantitative Tests

II. DISTRIBUTIONS distribution normal distribution. standard scores

SAMPLE. Verification of Comparability of Patient Results Within One Health Care System; Approved Guideline (Interim Revision)

TEST REPORT: SIEVERS M-SERIES PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS

A commitment to quality and continuous improvement

Two-Sample T-Tests Assuming Equal Variance (Enter Means)

Analytical Methods: A Statistical Perspective on the ICH Q2A and Q2B Guidelines for Validation of Analytical Methods

Applying Statistics Recommended by Regulatory Documents

Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary

Descriptive Statistics

Pearson's Correlation Tests

Assay Qualification Template for Host Cell Protein ELISA

Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement

Definition of Minimum Performance Requirements for Analytical Methods of GMO Testing European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL)

SIMPLE LINEAR CORRELATION. r can range from -1 to 1, and is independent of units of measurement. Correlation can be done on two dependent variables.

Overview of ISO for 'Biologicals'

IAEA-TECDOC Development and use of reference materials and quality control materials

X X X a) perfect linear correlation b) no correlation c) positive correlation (r = 1) (r = 0) (0 < r < 1)

How to Verify Performance Specifications

The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods. A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics

Basic research methods. Basic research methods. Question: BRM.2. Question: BRM.1

Validation of measurement procedures

ANALYTICAL DETECTION LIMIT GUIDANCE. & Laboratory Guide for Determining Method Detection Limits

ICH Topic Q 2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. Step 5

Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry

QbD Approach to Assay Development and Method Validation

The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods

Statistics in Medicine Research Lecture Series CSMC Fall 2014

Two-Sample T-Tests Allowing Unequal Variance (Enter Difference)

NCSS Statistical Software

Study Guide for the Final Exam

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)

APPENDIX N. Data Validation Using Data Descriptors

Using Excel for inferential statistics

IAS CALIBRATION and TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS DEFINITIONS

Sample Analysis Design Isotope Dilution

Introduction. Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing. Significance Testing

Proficiency testing schemes on determination of radioactivity in food and environmental samples organized by the NAEA, Poland

Hypothesis testing - Steps

Guidelines on the Reporting of Compliance with Specification

(Uncertainty) 2. How uncertain is your uncertainty budget?

Assay Development and Method Validation Essentials

Contents. Abstract... i. Committee Membership... iii. Foreword... vii. 1 Scope Introduction Standard Precautions...

CALIBRATION PRINCIPLES

Gap Analysis of ISO 15189:2012 and ISO 15189:2007 in the field of Medical Testing

A practical and novel standard addition strategy to screen. pharmacodynamic components in traditional Chinese medicine using

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS NEEDED TO PRODUCE QUALITY DATA

Unit 31 A Hypothesis Test about Correlation and Slope in a Simple Linear Regression

SMF Awareness Seminar 2014

Analytical Procedures and Method Validation

Table. Analytical characteristics of commercial cardiac troponin I and T assays declared by the manufacturer.

Tec hnic al Guide 2 A Guide on Measurement Uncertainty in Chemical & Microbiological Analysis

Guidance for Industry

General and statistical principles for certification of RM ISO Guide 35 and Guide 34

Come scegliere un test statistico

WM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff

Determination of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Volatile Solids (TVS) in Waters of Fresh/Estuarine/Coastal Waters

QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN VETERINARY TESTING LABORATORIES

HYPOTHESIS TESTING: CONFIDENCE INTERVALS, T-TESTS, ANOVAS, AND REGRESSION

Independent t- Test (Comparing Two Means)

CONTENTS OF DAY 2. II. Why Random Sampling is Important 9 A myth, an urban legend, and the real reason NOTES FOR SUMMER STATISTICS INSTITUTE COURSE

European cooperation for EAL-G23 THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN QUANTITATIVE TESTING. The Expression of Uncertainty in Quantitative Testing

Biostatistics: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS: 2, VARIABILITY

P07 CALA Application of Requirements in ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Revision 3.4 April 9, 2014

Unaccredited Point-of-Care Laboratory Testing Guideline for Physicians

Statistics I for QBIC. Contents and Objectives. Chapters 1 7. Revised: August 2013

Part 2: Analysis of Relationship Between Two Variables

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Re: Docket No. FDA-2014-D-1351; Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff on Flow Cytometric Devices

Spectrophotometry Practical Lesson on Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry

THE METHOD DETECTION LIMIT AND PRACTICAL QUANTITATION LEVEL: THEIR DERIVATIONS AND REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS

Tutorial 5: Hypothesis Testing

1.0 XRF Analyses Performance Evaluation

Gravimetric determination of pipette errors

How to Conduct the Method Validation with a New IPT (In-Process Testing) Method

Development and Validation of In Vitro Diagnostic Tests. YC Lee, Ph.D. CEO

Transcription:

Eurachem A FOCUS FOR ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY IN EUROPE Limit of detection, limit of quantification and limit of blank Elvar Theodorsson

LoB, LoD, LoQ Limit of blank (LoB), limit of decision, limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ) and are concepts and terms used to describe the lowest concentration of a measurand that can be reliably measured by a particular measurement procedure. The literature in this area has previously been and is unfortunately still confusing regarding concepts, nomenclature and methods. The approach recommended here is primarily based on recent recommendations by Eurachem https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/guides/pdf/mv_guide_2nd_ed_en.pdf

CLSI - IFCC

Imprecision profile

Common notion of limit of quantitation in clinical chemistry The concentration at which imprecision (coefficient of variation) of the method is 5% However Medical laboratories are already and increasingly faced with the question of the possible presence of a measurand for medical (tumor markers, infectious agents, carcinogens, pollutants) or legal reasons (drugs of abuse). More formal understanding of the detection limit and limit of quantitation is therefore needed

Detection limit is basically a familiar concept Absence of disease Absence of measurand = blank Persons with disease Measurand present

Detection limit is basically a familiar concept Participants With disease Without disease Positive test True positives False positives (type I error) Negative test False negatives (type II error) Total with disease True negatives Total without disease Total positive Total negative [PPV] [NPV] [Sensitivity] [Specificity]

Three levels Decision limit, limit of blank, critical value CCα (term used in the EU directives) LOD Limit of Detection, minimum detectable value, detection limit, CCβ (term used in the EU directives) LOQ quantification limit, quantitation limit, limit of quantitation, limit of determination, reporting limit, limit of reporting and application limit. 9

Critical value in clinical chemistry The concept critical value in the context of detection should be used with care in clinical chemistry since it is most commonly used to denote the concentration at which the laboratory needs to notify the clinic in an extraordinary manner

The limit of decision (CCα) The limit of decision (CCα) is the concentration of the measurand that is significantly different from zero. Limit of decision = CCα = s*1.65 The concept is e.g. used when determining whether a material is contaminated or not. The limit of blank (LoB) or critical value is not a concept defined in VIM 3 but has been defined as the highest apparent concentration of a measurand expected when replicates of a blank sample containing no measurand are measured. Null hypothesis: measurand absent Limit of decision = CCα Limit of blank Critical value 1.65*s α = 0.05 Alternative hypothesis: measurand present 50% false negatives if the true concentation is equal to the limit of decision

The limit of detection (LOD or CCβ) The limit of detection (LOD or CCβ) is the lowest concentration of the measurand that can be detected at a specified level of confidence. Limit of detection = LOD = s * 3.3 Null hypothesis: measurand absent Detection decision 3.30*s Alternative hypothesis: measurand present β=0.05 LOD α=0.05

Limit of detection (LOD or CCβ) VIM 3 Detection decision Null hypothesis: measurand absent 3.30*s Alternative hypothesis: measurand present β=0.05 LOD α=0.05 13

The limit of detection (LOD or CCβ) The detection limit of the measurement system/instrument and of the method should be kept apart. The detection limit of the measurement system is determined by presenting the system directly with the reagent blank or with other types of samples. When the detection limit of the measurement method is determined the sample is processed through the all steps of the measurement procedure. Null hypothesis: measurand absent Detection decision 3.30*s Alternative hypothesis: measurand present β=0.05 LOD α=0.05

Limit of quantitation (LoQ) The limit of quantitation (LoQ) is not a concept defined in VIM 3 but has been defined as the lowest concentration of measurand that can be determined with an acceptable level of repeatability precision and trueness. Null hypothesis: measurand absent 10 * s Limit of quantitation Alternative hypothesis: measurand present The limit of quantification (LOQ) is the lowest concentration at which the performance of a method or measurement system is acceptable for a specified use. Limit of quantitation = LOQ = s*10 15

Measuring interval Set of quantities of the same kind that can be measured by a given measuring instrument or measuring system with specified instrumental uncertainty, under defined conditions The measuring interval is dependent on the extent to which the measuring system can produce results which are fit for the intended purpose The lower limit of the measuring interval coincides with the limit of quantitation (LOQ) (the lowest concentration of the measurand that can be measured with an acceptable uncertainty) which is higher than the detection limit (LOD) 16

Measuring interval

Theory of hypothesis testing Jertzy Neyman Egon Pearson Roland Fisher

Limit of decision = CCα Limit of blank Critical value Null hypothesis: measurand absent 1.65*s Alternative hypothesis: measurand present 50% false negatives if the true concentation is equal to the limit of decision α = 0.05

Errors in detection Alpha (α) error = Type I error = False positive The probability of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis that a substance is not present when it is actually present Beta (β) error = Type II error = False negative The probability of falsely accepting the null hypothesis that a substance is absent, when in fact the substance is present at the designated concentration Null hypothesis: measurand absent Detection decision β α Alternative hypothesis: measurand present

M.C. Ortiz et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 674 (2010) 123 142

ISO-11843 standards (1997) The most common protocols for estimation of the LoD and LoQ including the ISO-standards assume that the instrument output at low concentrations can result in negative readings/concentrations

CLSI - IFCC

https://eurachem.org/images/stories/ Guides/pdf/MV_guide_2nd_ed_EN.pdf

Limit of decision (CCα) straightforward procedure applicable in clinical chemistry Determine the standard deviation (s) of ten independent measurements of a blank sample or of a sample with very low concentrations of the measurand Limit of decision = CCα = s * 1.65

Limit of detection (LOD= CCβ) straightforward procedure applicable in clinical chemistry Determine the standard deviation (s) of ten independent measurements of a blank sample or of a sample with very low concentrations of the measurand Limit of detection = LOD = s * 3.3

Limit of quantitation (LOQ) straightforward procedure applicable in clinical chemistry Determine the standard deviation (s) of ten independent measurements of a blank sample or of a sample with very low concentrations of the measurand Limit of quantitation = LOQ = s * 10 The multiplier is usually 10, but that number is historical and arbitrary. Other values such as 5 or 6 are commonly used (based on fitness for purpose criteria). Consider the fitness of purpose of using the concentration at which imprecision (coefficient of variation) of the method is 5%

Talanta Volume 129, 1 November 2014, Pages 606 616

Linnet & Kondratovich 2004 In clinical chemistry, asymmetric, nongaussian blank distributions are common, and the calibration curve may be nonlinear. For sample size n, the nonparametrically determined 95th percentile of the blank measurements {obtained as the value of the [n(95/100)+0.5]th ordered observation} defines the limit for results significantly exceeding zero [limit of blank (LoB)]. The LoD is the lowest value that is likely to yield a result exceeding the LoB. LoD is estimated as: LoB + c β xsd S, where SD S is the analytical SD of a sample with a low concentration c β is approximately equal to 1.65 for a type II error of 5%.

s 0 = The estimated standard deviation of m single results at or near zero concentration s 0 = The standard deviation used for calculating LOD and LOQ n = The number of replicate observations averaged when reporting results where each replicate is obtained following the ientire measurement procedure n b = The number of blank observations averaged when calculating the blank correction according to the measuremernt procedure From the results of m replicate measurements during validation calculate the standard deviation, s 0 Will the results be blank corrected during routine use of the method? No Yes Use the calculated standard deviation, s 0 for calculating the LOD and LOQ

Calculation of LOD What to do a) Replicate measurements of blank samples, i.e. matrices containing no detectable measurand or replicate measurement of test samples with low concentrations of the measurand b) Replicate measurements of reagent blanks or replicate measurements reagent blanks spiked with low concentrations of measurand How many What to calculate from the data times 10 Calculate the standard deviation, s0 of the results. Calculate s 0 from s 0 as shown in Fig. 1. Calculate LOD=3* s 0 10 Calculate the standard deviation, s 0 of the results. Calculate s 0 from s 0 as shown in Fig. 1. Calculate LOD=3* s 0 Comments Approach b) is acceptable, when it is not possible to obtain blank samples or test samples at low concentrations. When these blanks do not go through the whole measurement procedure the calculation will give instrumental LOD

Calculation of LOQ What to do a) Replicate measurements of blank samples, i.e. matrices containing no detectable measurand or replicate measurements of test samples with low concentrations of analyte. How many times What to calculate from the data 10 Calculate s 0 from s 0 as shown. Calculate LOQ as LOQ = kq s 0. Comments The value for the multiplier kq is usually 10, but other values such as 5 or 6 are commonly used (based on fitness for purpose criteria). b) Replicate measurements of reagent blanks or replicate measurements of reagent blanks spiked with low concentrations of measurand. 10 Calculate the standard deviation, s 0 of the results. Calculate s 0 from s 0 as shown in Fig. 1. Calculate LOQ as LOQ = kq s 0. Approach b) is acceptable, when it is not possible to obtain blank samples or test samples at low concentrations. When these reagent blanks are not taken through the whole measurement procedure and are presented directly to the instrument the calculation will give the instrument LOQ.

The limit of detection (LOD) is... A. The lowest concentration that can be measured B. The concentration at which we can decide whether an element is present or not C. The point where we can just distinguish a signal from the background D. The lowest concentration that should be repoted 0% 0% 0% 0% A. B. C. D.

The limit of quantification (LOQ) A. Is a purely statistical concept B. Is based on fitness of purpose criteria only C. Combines fitness of purpose criteria with statistical criteria D. Can be lower than LOD 0% 0% 0% 0% A. B. C. D.

Take a home message Decision limit, limit of blank, critical value, CCα (term used in the EU directives) Determine the standard deviation (s) of ten independent measurements of a blank sample or of a sample with very low concentrations of the measurand. Limit of decision = CCα = s*1.65 LOD, Limit of Detection, minimum detectable value, detection limit, CCβ (term used in the EU directives) Determine the standard deviation (s) of ten independent measurements of a blank sample or of a sample with very low concentrations of the measurand Limit of detection = LOD = s*3.3 LOQ, quantification limit, quantitation limit, limit of quantitation, limit of determination, reporting limit, limit of reporting and application limit. Determine the standard deviation (s) of ten independent measurements of a blank sample or of a sample with very low concentrations of the measurand Limit of quantitation = LOQ = s*10. Consider the fitness of purpose of using the concentration at which imprecision (coefficient of variation) of the method is 5%