Satellite Gravimetry

Similar documents
Examination Space Missions and Applications I (AE2103) Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Delft University of Technology SAMPLE EXAM

Günter Seeber. Satellite Geodesy 2nd completely revised and extended edition

Gravity Field and Dynamics of the Earth

Solar System. 1. The diagram below represents a simple geocentric model. Which object is represented by the letter X?

Use the following information to deduce that the gravitational field strength at the surface of the Earth is approximately 10 N kg 1.

Orbital Mechanics. Angular Momentum

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

2. Orbits. FER-Zagreb, Satellite communication systems 2011/12

IN-FLIGHT CALIBRATION OF THE MICROSCOPE SPACE MISSION INSTRUMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SIMULATOR

REaldatenAnaLyse GOCE (REAL GOCE) 5. Projekttreffen

Satellite Posi+oning. Lecture 5: Satellite Orbits. Jan Johansson Chalmers University of Technology, 2013

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

Prospects for an Improved Lense-Thirring Test with SLR and the GRACE Gravity Mission

Gravitational potential

EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASTRONOMY 100 Winter Quarter 2007 Sample Test # 1

Prof. Ludovico Biagi. Satellite Navigation and Monitoring

Notes: Most of the material in this chapter is taken from Young and Freedman, Chap. 13.

Newton s Law of Gravity

Orbital Mechanics and Space Geometry

Dynamics of Iain M. Banks Orbitals. Richard Kennaway. 12 October 2005

Section 4: The Basics of Satellite Orbits

Physics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives

The Moon. Nicola Loaring, SAAO

State Newton's second law of motion for a particle, defining carefully each term used.

Lecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System

Physics 41 HW Set 1 Chapter 15

PHYSICS FOUNDATIONS SOCIETY THE DYNAMIC UNIVERSE TOWARD A UNIFIED PICTURE OF PHYSICAL REALITY TUOMO SUNTOLA

Penn State University Physics 211 ORBITAL MECHANICS 1

The Gravitational Field

State Newton's second law of motion for a particle, defining carefully each term used.

Name Class Date. true

The Earth System. The geosphere is the solid Earth that includes the continental and oceanic crust as well as the various layers of Earth s interior.

Center of Gravity. We touched on this briefly in chapter 7! x 2

Physics 53. Gravity. Nature and Nature's law lay hid in night: God said, "Let Newton be!" and all was light. Alexander Pope

GOCE-ONLY GRAVITY FIELD MODEL DERIVED FROM 8 MONTHS OF GOCE DATA

The Earth Really is Flat! The Globe and Coordinate Systems. Long History of Mapping. The Earth is Flat. Long History of Mapping

Satellite Altimetry Missions

International Gravity Field Service (IGFS)

GPS Precise Point Positioning as a Method to Evaluate Global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model

Candidate Number. General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination June 2012

When the fluid velocity is zero, called the hydrostatic condition, the pressure variation is due only to the weight of the fluid.

USING MS EXCEL FOR DATA ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION

Geodynamics Lecture 2 Kinematics of plate tectonics

*UDYLW\)LHOG7XWRULDO

Exam # 1 Thu 10/06/2010 Astronomy 100/190Y Exploring the Universe Fall 11 Instructor: Daniela Calzetti

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great.

Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation

226 Chapter 15: OSCILLATIONS

Chapter 6 Work and Energy

circular motion & gravitation physics 111N

WORK DONE BY A CONSTANT FORCE

How To Understand General Relativity

Copyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd.

Interaction of Energy and Matter Gravity Measurement: Using Doppler Shifts to Measure Mass Concentration TEACHER GUIDE

Lecture 07: Work and Kinetic Energy. Physics 2210 Fall Semester 2014

What Do You Think? For You To Do GOALS

Lecture 19: Planet Formation I. Clues from the Solar System

KINEMATICS OF PARTICLES RELATIVE MOTION WITH RESPECT TO TRANSLATING AXES

G U I D E T O A P P L I E D O R B I T A L M E C H A N I C S F O R K E R B A L S P A C E P R O G R A M

TIDES. 1. Tides are the regular rise and fall of sea level that occurs either once a day (every 24.8 hours) or twice a day (every 12.4 hours).

Robot Perception Continued

Chapter 5: Circular Motion, the Planets, and Gravity

Hallerstrasse 6 CH-3012 Bern Switzerland. ISSI/HISPAC Forum on Understanding Gravity. 3/4 December 2013 at ISSI premises in Bern, Switzerland

Artificial Satellites Earth & Sky

3 Work, Power and Energy

3. KINEMATICS IN TWO DIMENSIONS; VECTORS.

Chapter 3.8 & 6 Solutions

Gravitation and Newton s Synthesis

Candidate Number. General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination June 2010

Physics 2A, Sec B00: Mechanics -- Winter 2011 Instructor: B. Grinstein Final Exam

Gravity measurements with atom interferometry

APPLIED MATHEMATICS ADVANCED LEVEL

KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT CERRO COSO COLLEGE PHYS C111 COURSE OUTLINE OF RECORD

What causes Tides? If tidal forces were based only on mass, the Sun should have a tidegenerating

PHY121 #8 Midterm I

Presentation of problem T1 (9 points): The Maribo Meteorite

Science Standard 4 Earth in Space Grade Level Expectations

Work, Power, Energy Multiple Choice. PSI Physics. Multiple Choice Questions

Online Courses for High School Students

Lab 8: Ballistic Pendulum

Educator Guide to S LAR SYSTEM El Prado, San Diego CA (619)

Fluid Mechanics Prof. S. K. Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Rotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque

Candidate Number. General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination June 2014

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

PEDAGOGY: THE BUBBLE ANALOGY AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GRAVITATIONAL FORCES AND ROCKET THRUST IN SPATIAL FLOW THEORIES OF GRAVITY *

Laser Ranging to Nano-Satellites

SIO 229 Gravity and Geomagnetism: Class Description and Goals

Catapult Engineering Pilot Workshop. LA Tech STEP

Physical Quantities and Units

How To Monitor Sea Level With Satellite Radar

Acceleration due to Gravity

Unit 4 Practice Test: Rotational Motion

Niraj Sir GRAVITATION CONCEPTS. Kepler's law of planetry motion

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Work and Energy. W =!KE = KE f

Transcription:

Satellite Gravimetry Reiner Rummel Institute of Advanced Study (IAS) Technische Universität München Lecture Three 5th ESA Earth Observation Summer School 2-13 August 2010, ESA-ESRIN, Frascati / Italy

plan for lecture three Lecture Three Measurement of the free fall of a test mass Interpretation of the motion of a satellite in its orbit as test mass in free fall From the orbit to the earth s gravitational field The use of several test masses in free fall Case One: the satellite mission GRACE Measurement of temporal changes in gravitation Case Two: the ESA Living Planet mission GOCE The principle of gravitational gradiometry Outlook

test mass in free fall gravitation, the story of the falling apple Reference: R Westfall: The life of Isaac Newton, Cambridge Univ Press, 1999 [Compare page 51 and 305]

test mass in free fall the size of gravity from measuring position and time x;t 0 0 x;t 1 1 x;t 2 2

test mass in free fall Absolute- Gravimeter FG5 at TU Hannover

test mass in free fall Absolut-Gravimeter FG5 (Micro-g Solutions, Inc.) Dropping Chamber Interferometer Drive Motor Free-Falling Corner Cuber Drag-Free Chamber ION PUMP APD Tripod Support Springs Superspring drop height: 0.2m / time: 0.2s 600 000 fringes per drop 100 drops per set; 25 sets Mach-Zender laser interferometer time: Rubidium atomic clock 10-10 vacuum: 10-4 Pa residual drag compensation micro seismisity: super spring Main Spring Laser Internal Reference Corner Cube Servo Coil

test mass in free fall position time air resistance silence laser interferometry atomic clock to be eliminated no vibrations Absolute- Gravimeter FG5 at TU Hannover

test mass in free fall terrestrial absolute gravimetry in the mountains

test mass in free fall gravity (in laboratory at TU München) 9.807 246 72 m/s 2 stationary variable 10 0 spherical Earth 10-3 flattening & centrifugal acceleration 10-4 mountains, valleys, ocean ridges, subduction 10-5 density variations in crust and mantle 10-6 salt domes, sediment basins, ores 10-7 tides, atmospheric pressure 10-8 temporal variations: oceans, hydrology 10-9 ocean topography, polar motion 10-10 general relativity

test mass in free fall map with global distribution of in-situ measurements

satellites - test masses in free fall Newton s brilliant conclusion: Orbit motion of planets (Kepler) obeys the same law as a free falling apple (Galileo) I. Newton De mundi systemate 1715

satellites - test masses in free fall satellite orbit Case 1 homogeneous sphere: Case 2 oblate sphere: Case 3 actual Earth: space fixed (Kepler) ellipse precessing ellipse (spiral) modulation from gravitation

satellites - test masses in free fall earth oblateness deduced from orbit plane precession 1957: Sputnik 1 earth flattening J 2 =1084 10-6

test mass in free fall 1957: Sputnik 1 today: LAGEOS I and II

satellites - test masses in free fall steady decrease of earth flattening change of trend in recent years Cox & Chao, Science, 297, 2002

satellites - test masses in free fall Temporal changes of the Earth s flattening: What are the causes? candidates: ocean masses melting ice caps atmospheric masses hydrology Dickey, Marcus, de Viron, Fukumori, 2002

satellites - test masses in free fall observatories see only short arc segments

satellites - test masses in free fall A new era: continuous tracking in 3D of low earth orbiters (LEOs) by navigation satellites (GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS )

satellites - test masses in free fall Absolut- location GPS Gravimeter time synchronized FG5 atomic clocks TU Hannover air resistance measured silence no ground vibrations

satellites - test masses in free fall atmospheric pressure at satellite altitude laboratory: 10-4 Pa = 10-6 mbar 300 km altitude: 8.77 10-8 mbar Emiliani C,1992, p.272

satellites - test masses in free fall CHAMP satellite GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam mission life time: 2000 2010 star sensors GPS receiver accelerometer at centre of mass

from the orbit to gravitation positioning (orbit determination) of CHAMP by GPS Δ x [m] 0.1 0.05 0 0.05 position difference between kinematic and reduced dynamic POD σ = 3 cm 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 time at DoY 231 [h] (Rothacher & Svehla, 2003)

gravitation from from the orbit to gravitation x;t 0 0 x;t 1 1 x;t 2 2 0.1 position difference between kinematic and reduced dynamic POD Δ x [m] 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 time at DoY 231 [h]

from the orbit to gravitation energy conservation kinetic energy = potential energy 1 mv 2 2 however: non conservative contributions residual air resistance and gravitation changes due to direct, solid earth & ocean tides, atmosphere oceans

from the orbit to gravitation gravitational potential along the orbit trajectory σ = 500 m 2 /s 2

from the orbit to gravitation gravitational potential along the orbit mapped onto the globe

potential along the orbit mapped onto the globe [m/s2] 90 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 90 60 60 30 30 0 0-30 -30-60 -60-90 0 60-80 120-60 -40 180-20 0 240 20 40 300 60 80-90 360 geoid [m]

the use of several free falling test masses

the use of several free falling test masses from absolute to differential measurement

the use of several free falling test masses GRACE NASA + DLR mission (in orbit since 2002) Gravitation from very precise measurement (1μm) of changes of inter satellite distance of two satellites following each other in the same orbit (200 km)

the use of several free falling test masses GRACE: measures tiny changes of gravitational acceleration Gerard Kruizinga, JPL, 2002

the use of several free falling test masses GRACE measures temporal gravitational changes example: seasonal changes of continental hydrology Tapley et al., Science, 2004

the use of several free falling test masses gravitational measurement in a micro-g environment

the use of several free falling test masses

tidal attraction of earth acting on a satellite satellite 260 km earth surface mass ration 1: 6 10 21

gravitational gradiometry principle g V x V x x g g V y V V y y g V z V z z g x x gx y gx z Vxx Vxy Vxz gy x gy y gy z Vyx Vyy Vyz gz x gz y gz z Vzx Vzy Vzz gravity tensor

gravitational gradiometry principle gravity tensor = tidal tensor = curvature tensor kns t fns i R0 j0vij g t kow f OW f g NS f OW gz

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry single accelerometer one axis gradiometer three axes gradiometer consisting of 6 accelerometers

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry measurement of micro-g with micro-precision

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry ion thrusters xenon tank nitrogen tank power supply star sensor gravity gradiometer GPS receiver ion thruster control unit magneto-torquers control unit a perfect laboratory in space source: ESA

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry instrument and control concept translational forces angular forces GPS/GLONASS SST -hl star sensors * * A B GRAVITY GRADIOMETER measures: gravity gradients angular accelerations common mode acc. drag control angular control

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry 1. The first gravitational gradiometer in space 2. European geodetic GPS-receiver on board 3. Extremly low orbit altitude (260 km) 4. Free fall (air drag is compensated along track) 5. Very soft angular control by magnetic torquing 6. Absolutely quiet and stiff satellite materials and environment

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry measurement in a rotating frame gravitation tensor centrifugal part (angular velocities) angular accelerations 2 2 Vxx Vxy V xz y z xy x z 0 z y 2 2 Vyx Vyy Vyz y x z x y z z 0 x 2 2 Vzx Vzy V zz z x z y x y y x 0 symmetric symmetric skew symmetric

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry X GRF Y A A 2 6 O 6 X X 6 2 Z 6 6 A Y 1 O 1 X 1 Z 1 1 O GRF A Y A 5 3 O X 5 X 5 3 Z 5 5 two sensitive and one less sensitive direction Y GRF Y O 2 Z 2 2 A Y 4 O 4 X 4 Z 4 4 Y O 3 Z 3 3 Z GRF 2 2 Vxx Vxy Vxz y z x y xz 0 z y 2 2 Vyx Vyy Vyz y x z x y z z 0 x 2 2 Vzx Vzy V zz z x zy x y y x 0

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry x y z x y V ik [E] 0.5 0 0.5 z 4 components measured with high precision and two less precise

GOCE and gravitational gradiometry trace condition (Laplace condition): the sum of the measured diagonal components should be zero

GOCE gravity field meters a global geoid map based on two months of data

Map compiled by M.Studinger, LDEO, Using data from Siegert et al. (2005) and NSIDC GOCE gravity field

GOCE versus GRACE 10 8 half wavelength [km] 400 200 130 100 80 65 10 9 10 10 GMs Kaula SST hl GOCE: maximum resolution (s= 100 km) Degree RMS 10 11 10 12 SGG 10 13 SST ll 10 14 GRACE: maximum precision (geoid < μm) 50 100 150 200 250 300 spherical harmonic degree

GOCE versus GRACE 10-6 Mean Signal per Degree / Degree Error Median 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 Mean Signal QL GOCE Model Mean Signal Kaula Rule ErrorMedianQLGOCEModel Error Median EIGEN-5S Error Median EIGEN-5C 50 100 150 200 Degree degree variances (median) of signal and noise

GOCE versus GRACE GRACE measures the long wavelength structure of gravity and geoid with extremely high precision GRACE can therefore even detect temporal changes in the earth system due to mass redistribition (ice, sea level, continetal hydrology) GOCE gives much higher spatial resolution This resolution is needed when using the geoid e.g. as refence level surface for studies of ocean circulation or for geodynamics

gravitation and the story pf the apple The tale of two ants walking on the surface of an apple: They start at A and A and walk on two adjacent paths along shortest distance (geodesics) on the curved apple to B and B. We measure the changing distance between the two ants. From these measured distances we deduce the local curvature of the apple. (analogy to the satellite mission GRACE and GOCE)

S. Dali: Sans titre, 1948

summary of lecture three uninterrupted tracking of a low orbiting satellite (LEO) by GPS in combination with measurement of non-gravitational forces by accelerometry corresponds to free fall absolute gravimetry in an laboratory on earth CHAMP (2000) was the first mission of this kind differential measurement of the relative motion of two satellites increases the sensitivity, (GRACE, 2002) gravitational gradiometry is differential accelerometry between several test masses inside one satellite GOCE is the first satellite with a gravitational gradiometer GRACE can be regarded as one-arm gradiometer with an arm length of 200 km