RESTON NETWORK ANALYSIS



Similar documents
1. REPORT CONTEXT Description of the development (include all of the following that are known at the time of the application):

Advantages and Disadvantages of One Way Streets October 30, 2007

Topic 2 11/28/2012 Blocks & Street Network

Roadway Cost Per Centerline Mile Revised June 2014

Tier 1 Strategies. WV Route 14 Corridor Management Plan

VERTICAL SPEED CONTROL DEVICES

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE STANDARDS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Performance Measures for a Sustainable Transportation Network Pasadena s Approach Frederick C. Dock, Ellen Greenberg, Mark Yamarone

APPENDIX J TRAFFIC STUDY

Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study. June 19, 2013

Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High


Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

Walkway Network Model Tools OR How Pedestrian Advocates Can Be the Smartest Folks in the Room. J. Scott Parker, Chad Tucker and Ellen Vanderslice

30 Years of Smart Growth

CHAPTER 2 TRAFFIC SIGNS AND HIGHWAY MARKINGS

DESCRIPTION OF WORK:

Best Practices in Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding in the Washington Region. Michael Farrell, COG/TPB DRAFT May 15, 2007

MEMORANDUM. Robert Nichols, Acting Corridor Design Manager Northgate Link Extension

Tier II FEIS Appendix G DEIS Comments and Responses Page G-158 SR 167 Puyallup to SR 509

Soapstone Connector Feasibility Study

01/31/13 ACHIEVING THE VISION FOR RESTON. Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)

21101 &?I I2 P 3: 2 I. kz COZY c:oi*;: iiss:en. DOCEET COEi1 f3.x..

ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Discussion. Presented to ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Advisory Group July 29 th, 2015

Median Bus Lane Design in Vancouver, BC: The #98 B-Line

Needs and Equity in Prioritizing Sidewalk

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Nebraska Avenue Complex Master Plan DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX C

Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies

Operating Vehicle Control Devices

Technical Report 4: Congestion Management Process Final Plan for Adoption October 2015

EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES

DE 8 Concept Plan and Operations Study. Dover Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee October 23, 2007

A23 CHEQUERS ROUNDABOUT, HORLEY: PREDESTRIAN AND CYCLING CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS

Arlington County FY12 Summary Report on Capital Bikeshare

Chapter 6. Intersections. 6 Intersections

Lawyers Road Diet Survey. Results Report

SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES SUB-ELEMENT

Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

PEDESTRIAN PLANNING AND DESIGN MARK BRUSSEL

South East of Process Main Building / 1F. North East of Process Main Building / 1F. At 14:05 April 16, Sample not collected

Office of Capital Facilities

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Downtown Community Planning Council Meeting offebruary 18, 2015

Congestion Management Systems: A Federal Perspective. 7 Key CMS Components

Chapter 9: Transportation

Strategic Regional Transit Plan

Environmental Impact Statement for the Washington Union Station Expansion Project

HENLEY ROYAL REGATTA 2016

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

STREETS -- BICYCLES -- PATHS

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

Review Public Input Report Jenn Toothaker. Approval of Meeting Summaries: May 21, May 23, May 30, & June 20, 2013 Meetings

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND EVALUATION MEASURES

Guelph Driving School. 246 WOOLWICH ST. Unit C Guelph, Ontario N1H 3V9. Office: Cell: info@guelphdrivingschool.

A Presentation by the Project Managers: Rick Canizales Prince William County. Jana Lynott, AICP Northern Virginia Transportation Commission

Oregon City Clackamas County Red Soils Campus

Los Angeles Metro Rapid

ExpressLanes CAG Summit. March 2, 2010

DOUGLAS COUNTY RESOLUTION NO CITY OF LAWRENCE RESOLUTION NO. 5094

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

NON-TRADITIONAL UTILITY COORDINATION on KYTC Projects. KYTC Partnering Conference September 9, 2014

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

AD HOC GROUP ON A-FRAME & DIGITAL SIGNAGE

ROUTE 178 CORRIDOR STUDY. Prepared For: KERN COG, CALTRANS, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

Transportation Impact Assessment Guidelines

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

City of Rockville Regional Development Impacts: Transportation Capacity Analysis. June, 2013

DRAFT SCOPING DOCUMENT BRIGHTVIEW SENIOR LIVING IRVINGTON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS)

7 th Street SW Cycle Track: Calgary s First Centre City Cycle Track

SAUCON RAIL TRAIL SPECIAL EVENT REGISTRATION FORM

D3 April 8, 2015 Public Hearing

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. Adopted by City Council Ordinance

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects

MassDOT s Work Zone Transportation Management Procedures. By: Neil Boudreau, MassDOT and Michael Sutton, P.E., VHB

Context Sensitive Design for Urban Transportation in West Philadelphia

I-25 / Rio Bravo Interchange

How To Build A City Of Virginia Beach Arena

County and UZA Cities and Towns Non-UZA Cities and Towns Regional Public Transportation Authority. June 2, 2015

Stouffville Corridor Rail Service Expansion

Road Signs Recognition Quiz

Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Studies 8 th Revision

Multi Modal Roadway Transportation Impact Fees and Asset Value

SUMMARY OF CATEGORIES 2007 STATEWIDE PRESERVATION PROGRAM (SPP) _MAINTAIN IT_

IMPLICATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED

A Review of Transit Technology Specifications

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: July 11, 2013

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY New Stadium Downtown Community Meeting

What is a Horizontal Curve?

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

CHAPTER FOUR: EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

Residential Driveway Installation Requirements. Table of Contents

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

Transcription:

RESTON NETWORK ANALYSIS What is the Network Analysis? What is the Network Analysis? What will it accomplish? The Network Analysis is evaluating the conceptual grid of streets in the Reston Transit Station Areas (TSAs) adopted in the Reston Phase I Plan Amendment. It takes into account the future demand for travel associated with the development around the three Reston Metrorail Stations. The end result will be a street network that is cost effective and requires the minimum right-of-way, with the least impacts to adjacent properties while addressing the future travel demand. It will take into consideration the provisions of the Reston Phase I Master Plan. The study has identified mitigation measures needed to achieve LOS E in the TSAs including new signals and turn lanes at new intersections. It will begin The analysis will identify the roadway features that are looking at locations where LOS E could not be achieved through these necessary to support acceptable traffic conditions and a walkable mitigation Measures. and bikeable environment in the TSAs. The study is scheduled be complete late 2016..

RESTON NETWORK ANALYSIS Project Process

RESTON NETWORK ANALYSIS Other Planning Efforts in Reston How does the Network Analysis relate to other efforts in Reston? New development, redevelopment, bikeshare and more; there sure is a lot going on in Reston! The Reston Network Analysis is a long-range look at the transportation conditions in the Reston Transit Station Areas (TSAs) in 2030 and 2050. The Network Analysis takes into account ongoing planning efforts by the Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT) and others which will impact the future of the transportation network in the Reston TSAs. The Reston Funding Plan is an concurrent effort by FCDOT to identify potential sources of revenue to implement the transportation recommendations made in the Reston Phase I Master Plan. The phasing of the funding for the improvements will be informed by the Network Analysis.

RESTON NETWORK ANALYSIS Pedestrian Connections What is a walkshed? The Grid of Streets makes a difference Walksheds are the area which can be reached on foot from a defined location. A lack of pedestrian infrastructure limits pedestrian mobility and accessibility in an area. Map 1 shows the current walkable areas with in quarter-mile, half-mile, and 1 mile from Reston s 3 Metrorail Stations. The Grid of Streets will be implemented as complete streets. The addition of these links to Reston s transportation network enhance movement of all modes. The grid will add much needed pedestrian facilities, increasing the area which can be accessed within a quarter-mile and half-mile walk from the Metrorail Stations. This improvement can be seen in Map 2. Map 1: 2015 Walkshed Map 2: 2050 Walkshed with Grid of Streets

2050 Peak Hour LOS Results Unmitigated Unmitigated results (right) show 2050 level of service (LOS) based on planned Comprehensive Plan improvements, including the grid of streets. Failing intersections demonstrate that further mitigation is necessary to meet the acceptable LOS E standard in the Reston Transit Station Areas (TSAs). Level of Service (LOS) LOS measures peak hour delay at an intersection or how well traffic moves along a roadway. LOS E is the standard for the Reston TSAs. Today, most intersections operate at an acceptable LOS but are projected to fail in the future as the demand for travel increases. 1st Tier Tier 1 results (right) show 2050 LOS with mitigation measures that have no right of way (ROW) impact, including signal optimization, modified lane configurations, and new stop signs and signals. Intersections which continue to fail require more mitigating measures. 2nd Tier Tier 2 results (right) show 2050 LOS with mitigation measures that include some right of way (ROW) impact, such as new through lanes and turn lanes, as well as additional signal re-timings and signals. Intersections which continue to fail will require larger-scale mitigation efforts.

2050 Peak Hour LOS Results Unmitigated Unmitigated results (right) show 2050 level of service (LOS) based on planned Comprehensive Plan improvements, including the grid of streets. Failing intersections demonstrate that further mitigation is necessary to meet the acceptable LOS E standard in the Reston Transit Station Areas (TSAs). Level of Service (LOS) LOS measures peak hour delay at an intersection or how well traffic moves along a roadway. LOS E is the standard for the Reston TSAs. Today, most intersections operate at an acceptable LOS but are projected to fail in the future as the demand for travel increases. 1st Tier Tier 1 results (right) show 2050 LOS with mitigation measures that have no right of way (ROW) impact, including signal optimization, modified lane configurations, and new stop signs and signals. Intersections which continue to fail require more mitigating measures. 2nd Tier Tier 2 results (right) show 2050 LOS with mitigation measures that include some right of way (ROW) impact, such as new through lanes and turn lanes, as well as additional signal re-timings and signals. Intersections which continue to fail will require larger-scale mitigation efforts.

2050 Peak Hour LOS Results Unmitigated Unmitigated results (right) show 2050 level of service (LOS) based on planned Comprehensive Plan improvements, including the grid of streets. Failing intersections demonstrate that further mitigation is necessary to meet the acceptable LOS E standard in the Reston Transit Station Areas (TSAs). Level of Service (LOS) LOS measures peak hour delay at an intersection or how well traffic moves along a roadway. LOS E is the standard for the Reston TSAs. Today, most intersections operate at an acceptable LOS but are projected to fail in the future as the demand for travel increases. 1 st Tier Tier 1 results (right) show 2050 LOS with mitigation measures that have no right of way (ROW) impact, including signal optimization, modified lane configurations, and new stop signs and signals. Intersections which continue to fail require more mitigating measures. 2 nd Tier Tier 2 results (right) show 2050 LOS with mitigation measures that include some right of way (ROW) impact, such as new through lanes and turn lanes, as well as additional signal re-timings and signals. Intersections which continue to fail will require larger-scale mitigation efforts.

RESTON NETWORK ANALYSIS Traffic Signals The first mitigation measures considered was the addition of new intersection control i.e. traffic signals, and the optimization of existing and proposed signals on the 2050 road network. Installation of traffic signals are subject to Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)standards. There are 78 existing signals in Reston. 26 new signals were identified in Tier 1, and 4 additional signals were identified in Tier 2