EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE



Similar documents
THE 2004 SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE AND INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI: WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY

How do scientists measure earthquakes?

Earthquakes. Earthquakes: Big Ideas. Earthquakes

The Severity of an Earthquake U.S. Department of the Interior/Geological Survey

Chapter 7 Earthquake Hazards Practice Exam and Study Guide

Geology for Engineers Earthquakes

The earthquake source

EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION

Presentations. Session 1. Slide 1. Earthquake Risk Reduction. 1- Concepts & Terminology

EARTHQUAKES. Compressional Tensional Slip-strike

Chapter 5: Earthquakes

Magnitude 7.2 GUERRERO, MEXICO

Lecture 12 Earthquake Magnitude

Plotting Earthquakes LESSON

KCC Event Brief: 2014 La Habra Earthquake

Unit 4 Lesson 6 Measuring Earthquake Waves. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Evaluating an Illinois Earthquake

Economic Benefit Cost Analysis: CoreFirst vs. Standard Retrofit

Earthquake Hazards and Risks

Plotting Earthquake Epicenters an activity for seismic discovery

FOURTH GRADE EARTHQUAKES 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

EARTHQUAKE. Definition of Hazard. History of Hazard as it Affects the City of Kent. Hazard Identification

Earthquakes Natural and Induced. Rick Aster Professor of Geophysics and Department Head Geosciences Department Colorado State University

DISASTER RESISTANCE EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES

Earthquakes and Plate Boundaries Deborah Jordan and Samuel Spiegel

Magnitude 8.8 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE

Name: Date: Class: Finding Epicenters and Measuring Magnitudes Worksheet

Locating the Epicenter and Determining the Magnitude of an Earthquake

Glossary. continental crust: the sections of crust, the outermost layer of the earth, that include the continents

Questions & Answers Proposed for Exam #3

Plate tectonics states that the Earth's crust and upper mantle are broken into sections, called plates.

Critical Facility Round Table

Name Date Class. By studying the Vocabulary and Notes listed for each section below, you can gain a better understanding of this chapter.

Earthquakes: Risk and Insurance Issues

Interactive Plate Tectonics

Earthquakes.

Earthquakes. Seismograph stations operated by the British Geological Survey

Plate Tectonics Web-Quest

Tsunami Practice Questions and Answers Revised November 2008

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

Earthquake Preparedness Tips & Strategies

February 28 Earthquake: We got off easy

FOURTH GRADE PLATE TECTONICS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Rapid Changes in Earth s Surface

Earthquakes: Risk & Insurance Issues

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

EARTH SCIENCE ACTIVITY #5 The Mercalli Scale

ES Chapter 10 Review. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

II. Earth Science (Geology) Section (9/18/2013)

Earthquakes and Data Centers

Plate Tectonics Practice Questions and Answers Revised August 2007

TECTONICS ASSESSMENT

4. Plate Tectonics II (p )

When Things Go Wrong

Project Report. Structural Investigations Hotel del Sol Yuma, Arizona

Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks

Earthquakes: Interesting Facts and F.A.Q.

Overview. NRC Regulations for Seismic. Applied to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. NRC History. How we Regulate

EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS

The Dynamic Crust 2) EVIDENCE FOR CRUSTAL MOVEMENT

Copyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd. Centre of Mass

AN ANALYSIS OF FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FAILURES DURING THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE AND COMPARISON WITH THE SEISMIC DESIGN STANDARD FOR THESE SYSTEMS

Chapter 6 Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes

Magnitude and Intensity

Exploring Our World with GIS Lesson Plans Engage

Storms Assessment LESSON

DYNAMIC CRUST: Unit 4 Exam Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes

Tectonic plates push together at convergent boundaries.

Unit: Restless Earth Lesson: Earth s Interior

1. You are about to begin a unit on geology. Can anyone tell me what geology is? The study of the physical earth I.

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

Chapter 2. Plate Tectonics. Plate Tectonics: Learning Goals

SMIP2000 Seminar Proceedings COSMOS VIRTUAL STRONG MOTION DATA CENTER. Ralph Archuleta

Plate Tectonics Lab. Continental Drift. The Birth of Plate Tectonics

Plate Tectonics: Ridges, Transform Faults and Subduction Zones

Earth Egg Model Teacher Notes

NATHAN world map of natural hazards version

Practice Test SHM with Answers

Five reasons buildings fail in an earthquake and how to avoid them

CONTRASTING DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS OF DUCTILE STRUCTURES FROM TOHOKU SUBDUCTION TO CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKE RECORDS. Peter Dusicka 1 and Sarah Knoles 2

Chapter Overview. Bathymetry. Measuring Bathymetry. Echo Sounding Record. Measuring Bathymetry. CHAPTER 3 Marine Provinces

Chapter 8: Plate Tectonics -- Multi-format Test

Transform Boundaries

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT BOLINAS MARINE STATION - BOLINAS, CALIFORNIA

SIESMIC SLOSHING IN CYLINDRICAL TANKS WITH FLEXIBLE BAFFLES

SECOND GRADE PLATE TECTONICS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

APPLICATION OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING INFORMATION IN HOSPITAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

Geology 112 Earthquakes. Activity 1 Worksheet Introduction to the Course. What is a Fault? What is an Earthquake?

American Society of Civil Engineers

NATURAL DISASTERS Vol. I - Earthquake Parameters Including Strong Earthquakes- S.L.Yunga EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS INCLUDING STRONG EARTHQUAKES

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

Earthquakes in Hawaii:

Using Google Earth to Explore Plate Tectonics

Section 1. Logarithms

ABSG Consulting, Tokyo, Japan 2. Professor, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan 3

6.0 Results of Risk Analyses

1 Exploring Earth s Interior

Transcription:

EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE Earliest measure of earthquake size Dimensionless number measured various ways, including M L local magnitude m b body wave magnitude M s surface wave magnitude M w moment magnitude Easy to measure Empirical - except for M w, no direct tie to physics of faulting Note; not dimensionally correct

T s =D/V s T p = D/V p T s -T p = D/V s - D/V p = D (V p -V s ) / V s V p -> D = (T s - T p ) * V p V s /(V p - V s )

COMPARE EARTHQUAKES USING SEISMIC MOMENT M 0 Magnitudes, moments (dyncm), fault areas, and fault slips for several earthquakes Alaska & San Francisco differ much more than M s implies M 0 more useful measure Units: dyne-cm or Nt-M Directly tied to fault physics Doesnʼt saturate Stein & Wysession, 2003

the big one

EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETER ESTIMATES HAVE CONSIDERABLE UNCERTAINTIES FOR SEVERAL REASONS: - Uncertainties due to earth's variability and deviations from the mathematical simplifications used. Even with high-quality modern data, seismic moment estimates for the Loma Prieta earthquake vary by about 25%, and Ms values vary by about 0.2 units. - Uncertainties for historic earthquakes are large. Fault length estimates for the San Francisco earthquake vary from 300-500 km, Ms was estimated at 8.3 but now thought to be ~7.8, and fault width is essentially unknown and inferred from the depths of more recent earthquakes and geodetic data. - Different techniques (body waves, surface waves, geodesy, geology) can yield different estimates. - Fault dimensions and dislocations shown are average values for quantities that can vary significantly along the fault Hence different studies yield varying and sometimes inconsistent values. Even so, data are sufficient to show effects of interest.

Moment magnitude M w Magnitudes saturate: No matter how big the earthquake m b never exceeds ~6.4 M s never exceeds ~8.4 M w defined from moment so never saturates

DIFFERENT MAGNITUDE SCALES REFLECT AMPLITUDE AT DIFFERENT PERIODS Body & surface wave magnitudes saturate - remain constant once earthquake exceeds a certain size - because added energy release in very large earthquakes is at periods > 20 s 20 s 1 s No matter how big an earthquake is, body and surface wave magnitudes do not exceed ~ 6.5 and 8.4, respectively. For very large earthquakes only low period moment magnitude reflects earthquakeʼs size. This issue is crucial for tsunami warning because long periods excite tsunami, but are harder to study in real time

THREE EARTHQUAKES IN NORTH AMERICA - PACIFIC PLATE BOUNDARY ZONE Tectonic setting affects earthquake size San Fernando earthquake on buried thrust fault in the Los Angeles area, similar to Northridge earthquake. Short faults are part of an oblique trend in the boundary zone, so fault areas are roughly rectangular. The down-dip width seems controlled by the fact that rocks deeper than ~20 km are weak and undergo stable sliding rather than accumulate strain for future earthquakes. San Francisco earthquake ruptured a long segment of the San Andreas with significantly larger slip, but because the fault is vertical, still had a narrow width. This earthquake illustrates approximately the maximum size of continental transform earthquakes. Stein & Wysession, 2003 Alaska earthquake had much larger rupture area because it occurred on shallow-dipping subduction thrust interface. The larger fault dimensions give rise to greater slip, so the combined effects of larger fault area and more slip cause largest earthquakes to occur at subduction zones rather than transforms.

LARGER EARTHQUAKES GENERALLY HAVE LONGER FAULTS AND LARGER SLIP Wells and Coppersmith, 1994 M7, ~ 100 km long, 1 m slip; M6, ~ 10 km long, ~ 20 cm slip Important for tectonics, earthquake source physics, hazard estimation

Earthquake Scaling Relations San Andreas Fault System log 10 A ~ M

ENERGY & MAGNITUDE ~ 5.8+2.4m b ~ 11.8+1.5M s 5 5

Earthquakes of a given magnitude are ~10 times less frequent than those one magnitude smaller. An M7 earthquake occurs approximately monthly, and an earthquake of M> 6 about every three days. Magnitude is proportional to the logarithm of the energy released, so most energy released seismically is in the largest earthquakes. An M 8.5 event releases more energy than all other earthquakes in a year combined. Hence the hazard from earthquakes is due primarily to large (typically magnitude > 6.5) earthquakes.

Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2007) Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF2) M 6.7: 97% M 7.0: 81% M 7.5: 39% Southern California 30-year probabilities M 8.0: 2% UCERF2 ratio of time-dependent to time-independent participation probabilities for M 6.7

Intensity scale Measures damage to structures Often used is Mercalli I-XII Can be used to examine historic earthquakes without seismic records For example, eastern US.

Intensity Observed Effects I Not felt at all II Felt only by a few individuals, indoors and at rest, usually on upper floors of tall buildings. III Felt indoors by many persons, but not necessarily recognized as an earthquake. Chandeliers and hanging plants swing. IV Felt both indoors and out. Feels like the vibration caused by a heavy truck or train passing. Windows rattle. V Strong enough to awaken sleeping persons. Small objects knocked off shelves. Beverages may splash out of cups or glasses on tables. VI Perceptible to everyone. May cause public fright. Pictures fall off walls. Weak masonry cracks. Some plaster may fall from ceilings. VII Difficult to stand upright. Ornamental masonry falls from buildings. Waves may be seen in ponds and swimming pools. VIII Mass panic may occur. Chimneys, smoke stacks and water towers may lean and fall. Unsecured frame houses slide off foundations. IX Panic is general. Heavy damage to masonry structures and to underground pipes. Large cracks open in ground. X Many buildings collapse. Water splashes over riverbanks. XI-XII Virtually total destruction.