5.5. Solving linear systems by the elimination method



Similar documents
Solving Systems of Linear Equations Using Matrices

1.2 Solving a System of Linear Equations

Section 8.2 Solving a System of Equations Using Matrices (Guassian Elimination)

Solving Systems of Linear Equations

MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

Solving Systems of Linear Equations

Row Echelon Form and Reduced Row Echelon Form

2x + y = 3. Since the second equation is precisely the same as the first equation, it is enough to find x and y satisfying the system

8.2. Solution by Inverse Matrix Method. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Linear Equations ! $ & " % & " 11,750 12,750 13,750% MATHEMATICS LEARNING SERVICE Centre for Learning and Professional Development

Question 2: How do you solve a matrix equation using the matrix inverse?

Solving simultaneous equations using the inverse matrix

Click on the links below to jump directly to the relevant section

December 4, 2013 MATH 171 BASIC LINEAR ALGEBRA B. KITCHENS

Partial Fractions. p(x) q(x)

3. Solve the equation containing only one variable for that variable.

1 Determinants and the Solvability of Linear Systems

5 Systems of Equations

2.3 Solving Equations Containing Fractions and Decimals

The Method of Partial Fractions Math 121 Calculus II Spring 2015

Balancing Chemical Equations

Linearly Independent Sets and Linearly Dependent Sets

1 Determine whether an. 2 Solve systems of linear. 3 Solve systems of linear. 4 Solve systems of linear. 5 Select the most efficient

10.2 Systems of Linear Equations: Matrices

Using row reduction to calculate the inverse and the determinant of a square matrix

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m

Part 1 Expressions, Equations, and Inequalities: Simplifying and Solving

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS

a 11 x 1 + a 12 x a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x a 2n x n = b 2.

Algebra I Notes Relations and Functions Unit 03a

Linear Algebra Notes

Lecture 1: Systems of Linear Equations

MATH2210 Notebook 1 Fall Semester 2016/ MATH2210 Notebook Solving Systems of Linear Equations... 3

SIMPLIFYING ALGEBRAIC FRACTIONS

Matrices 2. Solving Square Systems of Linear Equations; Inverse Matrices

Solving Linear Equations - General Equations

Systems of Linear Equations

Systems of Equations

1 Solving LPs: The Simplex Algorithm of George Dantzig

Partial Fractions. Combining fractions over a common denominator is a familiar operation from algebra:

SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES WITH THE TI-89. by Joseph Collison

3.6. Partial Fractions. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Arithmetic and Algebra of Matrices

No Solution Equations Let s look at the following equation: 2 +3=2 +7

Chapter 9. Systems of Linear Equations

Numerical and Algebraic Fractions

Chapter 6. Linear Programming: The Simplex Method. Introduction to the Big M Method. Section 4 Maximization and Minimization with Problem Constraints

Math Common Core Sampler Test

Linear Programming. March 14, 2014

Zeros of a Polynomial Function

LAB 11: MATRICES, SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS and POLYNOMIAL MODELING

10.2 ITERATIVE METHODS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS. The Jacobi Method

Solving Linear Systems, Continued and The Inverse of a Matrix

2.2/2.3 - Solving Systems of Linear Equations

The Basics of FEA Procedure

10.1 Systems of Linear Equations: Substitution and Elimination

Method To Solve Linear, Polynomial, or Absolute Value Inequalities:

Equations, Inequalities & Partial Fractions

Excel supplement: Chapter 7 Matrix and vector algebra

Chapter 2: Linear Equations and Inequalities Lecture notes Math 1010

DERIVATIVES AS MATRICES; CHAIN RULE

6-3 Solving Systems by Elimination

5.4 Solving Percent Problems Using the Percent Equation

Methods for Finding Bases

Department of Chemical Engineering ChE-101: Approaches to Chemical Engineering Problem Solving MATLAB Tutorial VI

is identically equal to x 2 +3x +2

Lecture 5 Principal Minors and the Hessian

Linear Equations in Linear Algebra

Reduced echelon form: Add the following conditions to conditions 1, 2, and 3 above:

MATHEMATICS FOR ENGINEERS BASIC MATRIX THEORY TUTORIAL 2

Algebraic expressions are a combination of numbers and variables. Here are examples of some basic algebraic expressions.

Partial Fractions. (x 1)(x 2 + 1)

Basic numerical skills: EQUATIONS AND HOW TO SOLVE THEM. x + 5 = = (2-2) = = 5. x = 7-5. x + 0 = 20.

Mathematical goals. Starting points. Materials required. Time needed

Fractions to decimals

FACTORING QUADRATICS and 8.1.2

expression is written horizontally. The Last terms ((2)( 4)) because they are the last terms of the two polynomials. This is called the FOIL method.

Base Conversion written by Cathy Saxton

HFCC Math Lab Arithmetic - 4. Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication and Division of Mixed Numbers

MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION OF REAL NUMBERS In this section we will complete the study of the four basic operations with real numbers.

MATH APPLIED MATRIX THEORY

1 Lecture: Integration of rational functions by decomposition

Fractions and Linear Equations

2.6 Exponents and Order of Operations

LS.6 Solution Matrices

Ratio and Proportion Study Guide 12

Abstract: We describe the beautiful LU factorization of a square matrix (or how to write Gaussian elimination in terms of matrix multiplication).

Pre-Algebra Lecture 6

Radicals - Rationalize Denominators

Welcome to Basic Math Skills!

Factoring Polynomials

Year 9 set 1 Mathematics notes, to accompany the 9H book.

Simplifying Algebraic Fractions

1.5 SOLUTION SETS OF LINEAR SYSTEMS

Lecture Notes 2: Matrices as Systems of Linear Equations

Systems of Linear Equations

Vieta s Formulas and the Identity Theorem

Name: Section Registered In:

Typical Linear Equation Set and Corresponding Matrices

Transcription:

55 Solving linear systems by the elimination method Equivalent systems The major technique of solving systems of equations is changing the original problem into another one which is of an easier to solve form In this procedure we need to be sure that the new system has the same solution set No solution is added and no solution is lost It leads to the concept of equivalent systems 551 DEFINITION We say that two systems are equivalent if and only if they have equal solution sets 552 EXAMPLE Let us consider the system By the back-substitution we can find that the solution set of the above system is {1, 4, 3} Now let us look at another system which is not exactly the same as the original one 21x + 6y + 6z = 63 4y + 6z = 12 2z = 6 Applying the back-substitution again we find that the solution set of this system is also {1, 4, 3} It means that the second system is equivalent to the original system Now let us consider the third system 2y + 3z = 13 Back-substitution tells us that the solution set is { 1, 11, 3} So the solution set of the third system is not the same as the solution set of the first system It means that they are not equivalent 1

Replacing systems by equivalent systems How do we know that simplifying a system of equations we obtain the one which is equivalent to the original system? It depends what we do to simplify the system There are certain operations which for sure lead to equivalent system Even more, they are general and can be used to solve any system of linear equations First Operation: interchanging two equationslet us start with the simplest one: interchanging two equations Changing the order of equations in the system does not effect the solutions set which is still the intersection of the same solution sets of individual equations 553 EXAMPLE Obviously, the following two systems have identical solution sets, so they are equivalent Second Operation: multiplying an equation by a number The second operation which leads to the equivalent system is multiplying one equation in the original system by a number which not 0 We know that the solution set of the equation multiplied by a number does not change So the solution set of the whole system does not change being the intersection of the same sets 554 EXAMPLE In the Example 552 we have checked that the two following equations have equal solution sets 21x + 6y + 6z = 63 2

Third Operation: adding a multiple of one equation to another equation The third operation which leads to the equivalent systems is the most useful because it changes a system significantly It is adding a multiple of one equation in the system to another equation Let us describe it closer It is only between two equations in the system The first equation is not changed but only used to change the second one The second equation is changed in the following way: we replace it by the sum of the second and the first multiplied by a number Let us illustrate it with an example 555 EXAMPLE Let us consider the system x + 2y = 3 3x + 4y = 2 We multiply the first equation by 3 and add to the second equation It gives us the new second equation We obtain the system x + 2y = 3 3x + 3x + 4y + 32y = 2 + 33 x + 2y = 3 2y = 7 The elimination method For two equivalent systems the one which has an equation with less number of variables is simpler to solve Thus eliminating variables is one of the most powerful method of solving systems of equations Each particular system equation that we are going to present could be solved in many different ways Sometimes much simpler than what we present However, our concern is to present the method which is not difficult and, at the same time, works in general for all linear systems The simple form that we want to achieve is the form to which is possible to apply the back-substitution method Let us start with the example 3

556 EXAMPLE Let us consider the following system 2x + 3y = 13 We want to eliminate the unknown x from the second equation The x-coefficient in the first equation is 3 so we multiply the second equation by 3 6x + 9y = 39 Then we multiply the first equation multiply by 2 and add to the second equation to obtain the new second equation It gives 6x + 23x + 9y + 24y = 39 + 218 y = 3 At this moment we are done with the elimination To finish the problem up we use the back-substitution method which gives the solution set {2, 3} For the system in three variables the method of elimination is just longer but the steps are mainly the same 557 EXAMPLE let us consider the following 3 3 system 3x + y + 2z = 13 2x + 3y + 4z = 19 We see that in the last equation the x coefficient is 1 It is very convenient because it would be an equation to use to eliminate x from the other equations Let us move it to the front by changing the order of equations 3x + y + 2z = 13 2x + 3y + 4z = 19 4

Now the elimination starts We add the first equation multiplied by 3 to the second equation 2x + 3y + 4z = 19 We add the first equation multiplied by 2 to the third equation 5y 2z = 11 The system still does not fit to back-substitution We need to eliminate the variable y from the last equation In order to do it we need first to multiply the third equation by 11 55y + 22z = 121 Then we add the second equation multiplied by 5 to third equation 13z = 39 Now we can use the back-substitution method It gives us the solution set {2, 1, 3} Gaussian elimination for matrices When we perform the elimination there is a lot of writing It is especially inconvenient to carry on the symbols of variables The algebraic operations are done on the numbers only So we can skip the symbols of variables and do the elimination on the augmented matrix associated to the system It is called Gaussian elimination for matrices We need to remember that not seeing a variable in the equation means the same as seeing 0 in the corresponding location in the augmented matrix We illustrate Gaussian elimination for two variables first To show the connection between the two methods we will use the augmented matrix of the system from the Example 556 5

558 EXAMPLE 2 3 13 First we multiply the second row by the number 3 3 2 3 3 3 13 = 6 9 39 The we multiply the first row by the number 2 and the result to the second to get the new second row 6 + 2 3 9 + 2 4 39 + 2 18 = 0 1 3 559 EXAMPLE First we interchange the rows 3 1 2 13 3 1 2 13 Then we multiply the first row by 3 and add to the second row 3 + 3 1 1 + 3 4 2 + 3 3 13 + 3 15 Then we multiply the first row by 2 and add to the third row 2 + 2 1 3 + 2 4 4 + 2 3 19 + 2 15 0 5 2 11 6

Then we multiply the third row by 11 0 11 5 11 2 11 11 0 55 22 121 Finally, we multiply the second row by 5 and add to the third row 0 55 + 5 11 22 + 5 7 121 + 5 32 0 0 13 39 7