Structural concepts for minimum facility platforms for Marginal field development in western offshore, India

Similar documents
Challenges and Opportunities for Development of Marginal Fields through Cluster system: A case study from Western Offshore Basin, India

OWPST & Titan 200 & UK Offshore

Offshore Structures. Offshore Drilling Equipment

Monobuckets and the competitiveness versus monopiles and jacket structures.

INSTALLATION and LOGISTICS of OFFSHORE WIND FARMS

Platform Technologies for Offshore Renewable Energy Conversion Diego Vannucci, RINA

MEK4450. Templates & Manifolds. 29 August Templates and Manifolds. This module will cover:

4. PROGRAMME OF WORK: PROJECT ACTIVITIES, TIMESCALE AND COSTS

RISER SYSTEMS. Our world class innovation solving your riser challenges

MERMAID FLEET PROFILE SUBSEA SERVICES

Offshore Work Packages

Design of Offshore Wind Farms Prepared by Flemming Jakobsen & Andrass Ziska Davidsen LICENGINEERING A/S

Steel construction. Solutions for the renewable energy and offshore sectors. published by energyengineering magazine

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

An Overview of Design, Analysis, Construction and Installation of Offshore Petroleum Platforms Suitable for Cyprus Oil/Gas Fields

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

Manual: Nearshore CPT Testing NEARSHORE CONE PENETRATION TESTING (TOP PUSH TECHNIQUE)

Brandangersundet Bridge A slender and light network arch

SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES Offshore Structure Design And Construction Paul A Frieze OFFSHORE STRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures

installation, operations & maintenance

Tidal Energy. Wind Energy. Transmission & Distribution Network. Offshore Substation. Onshore Substation. Tidal Stream Energy.

Lightning Protection Introduction

Introduction BAM and Van Oord GBF - Concrete Centre Conference, December 2012

GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY

w o r k o G f E A x - p r S i t n c e Elegance and Strength BBR HiAm CONA Strand Stay Cable Damping Systems

Hurricanes and the Offshore oil and Natural Gas Industry

GRAVITY BASE FOUNDATIONS

Innovation in Offshore Wind support structures

Horizon Survey and Geotechnical Companies

2001/069. Decks, stairways,gangways and their associated handrails OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY REPORT HSE

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

LINKING SEABED TO SURFACE

The International Workshop on Micropiles, 2007

HPHT CAPPING STACKS AND NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR SUBSEA WELL CONTROL. December 3, 2014 Presenter: Mike Cargol

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

CONTAINMENT BOOM OBJECTIVE & STRATEGY TACTIC DESCRIPTION. Mechanical Recovery Containment and Recovery

Windfarm Installation Barge. a novel approach to installing foundations in offshore wind

Nautischer Verein zu Bremerhaven Bremerhaven, Nautischer Verein

EN :2005. Wind actions

GENERAL OCEAN TOW RECOMMENDATIONS FOR JACKUP DRILLING UNITS International Association of Drilling Contractors (I.A.D.C.) February 13, 1991

Saipem UK Ltd. Saipem. Eni. for graduate engineer recruitment

AOG 2015 Acoustic System to Monitor Wellhead Fatigue in Real-time. March 12 th

HV Submarine Cable Systems Design, Testing and Installation

Tremie Concrete CM 420 CM 420 CM 420 CM 420. Temporary Structures. Tremie Concrete

EZ-48-3AB Weather Station Mounting Tripod and Mast

Types of Structures. Mass Structures. A Layered Look

Grassroots Drilling. A History and Look Ahead. David Wennerstrom. ICOTA Roundtable October 2005 Canadian Chapter

Competitive Edge through System Engineering

Technical Project Description for Offshore Wind Farms (200 MW)

Asset Data Dictionary Definition Document Continuous Flight Auger Piles (CFA) Uniclass Classification

Services Enclosures and Protected Shafts - Maintaining Compartmentation

Step 11 Static Load Testing

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

Advantages of our solution

The Use of Coatings for Corrosion Control on Offshore Oil Structures. J. Peter Ault, P.E. Consultant Ocean City, NJ

Oil and Gas Offshore.

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

COWI offshore wind marine engineering services

Proven Capability for Offshore Installation. Heavy Lift-cum-Pipelay Vessel LTS3000

First Power Production figures from the Wave Star Roshage Wave Energy Converter

Requirements for an Excavation and Lateral Support Plan Building (Administration) Regulation 8(1)(bc)

APE Pile Driving Course: Understanding Pile Driving Leads

Civil Engineering and Marine Works (CEM) Offshore Branch Office

Engineers at Liftech designed the structure of the first container crane and have designed and reviewed thousands of container cranes since.

Sjøoffiserskonferansen i Bergen. Welcome! INNOVATION FOR WORLD CLASS CUSTOMERS. Innovation Technology Reliability. xervo.dk

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

Climate Change and Infrastructure Planning Ahead

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

Transmission Foundations. helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures.

Arctic HSE seminar 1. Ice behavior in northern regions, availability and need for metocean & ice data. Paul Verlaan 24 th March 2014

Blast Resistant Building BP Refinery Rotterdam

How To Retaining Wall Guide

EST Cost Estimating for Offshore Oil & Gas Facility Decommissioning

Standards for design of offshore wind farm structures and their foundations

Service life of synthetic fibre ropes in deepwater lifting operations. The 15 th North Sea Offshore Cranes & Lifting Conference Ashley Nuttall

High Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects

Design Basis for Offshore Wind Turbines for shallow and deep water

Shade Sail Structures

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

Piers, Wharves & Docks

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

CPTs EXECUTED IN DIFFICULT CONDITIONS USING CPTWD (CONE PENETRATION TEST WHILE DRILLING) AND ITS FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

FINAL FAILURE INVESTIGATION WESTCHESTER NORTH LAGOON BRIDGE. Anchorage, Alaska

6. Feb København Vinterkonferanse 2009 Norsk Forening for Ledende Bore og Brønnpersonell

Geotechnical Design Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines

Machine Foundation Design

Foundation Technologies for Offshore Deep Water Renewable Energy. Masters in Civil Engineering

Self-Elevating Platforms Guidelines for Operations and Towages UNCONTROLLED

Annex A (normative) Supplementary Requirements

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS

Transcription:

Structural concepts for minimum facility platforms for Marginal field development in western offshore, India A collaborative project By IIT Madras and IEOT,ONGC 24 April 2007 1

Outline Conventional Wellhead Platforms Existing Marginal platforms Minimum Facility Platforms Basic Requirements Environmental Conditions Installation by Jackups Concepts Technical Feasibility Cost Comparison Conclusions 2

Field Map Western Offshore, India 2180000 B-105 ## B-15 B-55 # 2170000 2160000 2150000 2140000 2130000 2120000 B-188 B-48 B-46 WO-24 B-45 B-192 SBM BHN NQO MUMBAI HIGH ICW BHS SH BHE-1 B-157 # B-59 B-127 Mukta Field (JV) B-147 16" X 77 km B-55 to SHG 14" OIL 12" GAS Panna Field (JV) B-149 BPA BS-13 BS-16 # B-22 BPB 36" X 231 km Gas trunk line Bassein to Hazira 42" X 244 km Gas trunk line BPB to Hazira VASAI EAST (BSE) # 28" X 78 km SH - BPB Line 26 " Gas trunk line to Uran 30" X 203 km Oil trunk line to Uran 2110000 2100000 WO-5 # B-121/119 # WO-15 WO-16 ## B-80 BS-12 B-23A B-28 ## B-193 ## BASSEIN ## B-178 ## B-179 B-180 B-172 ## ## # B-173A 30" X 142 km SHP - HEERA Line 2090000 2080000 D-33 B-28A ## B-37 # INDEX OIL LINE GAS LINE OIL FIELD 2070000 2060000 D-1 D-18 Marginal Fields around Mumbai High and Bassein Fields SCALE 0 km 10 km 20 km 30 km 40 km B-134 HEERA NEELAM 24" Oil trunk line to Uran 18" oil and gas line 26" Gas trunk line to Uran # # # GAS FIELD OIL & GAS FIELD SOUR FIELD HIGHLY SOUR FIELD SWEET OIL/GAS 710000 720000 730000 740000 750000 760000 770000 780000 790000 800000 810000 820000 830000 840000 850000 860000 3

CONVENTIONAL WELL PLATFORM CONFIGURATIONS SINGLE PILE CONFIGURATION SKIRT PILE (ONLY) CONFIGURATION SKIRT & MAIN PILE CONFIGURATION Main Pile of 60 INCH 68 INCH 72 INCH 84 INCH 90 INCH Combinations of 54 SKIRT WITH 48 MAIN PILE 54 SKIRT WITH 54 MAIN PILE 60 SKIRT WITH 54 MAIN PILE Skirt Piles of 84 SKIRT WITH 48 LEG 84 SKIRT WITH 60 LEG FULL BRACING 84 SKIRT WITH 60 LEG 4

Concepts used in other regions in the industry UK Norway Australia 5

PROPOSED CONCEPTS FOR WESTERN OFFSHORE Mono Pile Concepts Jacket Type Concepts Braced Conductor legs Guy Supports structure 6

Mono Pile Concepts Mono pile concepts involve driving of large diameter pile and supporting the deck from the single leg. This can be augmented by additional skirt piles in order to reduce large bending of mono piles. The mono pile houses 3 or 4 conductors inside thus reducing the wave loads. 1(a) 1(b) 1(c) Another alternative to this is to have conductors outside the mono pile. Mono Pile without Guy Wire Braced Mono Tower (Inside Conductor) Braced Mono Tower (Outside Conductor) 7

Jacket Type Concepts Jacket type concepts involves 3 or 4 legs with conductors inside the jacket framing. The jacket legs are either battered or vertical. Three alternate scheme are proposed are shown in figure. 2(a) 2(b) 2(c) The above concepts can be extended to water depths exceeding 30m and has the flexibility of increase in number of wells or topside configurations. 4 Legged Jacket Structure 4 Legged Jacket Structure with Batter Piles 3 Legged Jacket Structure 8

Braced Conductor Leg Concepts In this concepts four conductor cum legs are braced to form frame which will be fixed to the seabed by skirt piles. 3 (a) 3 (b) The advantage of these concepts is that the wave loads is reduced considerably since the jacket legs and framing near water level is reduced. Braced Leg Jacket (4 Piles) Braced Leg Jacket (3 Piles) 9

Guy support Structures 4(a) 4(b) 4(c) 4 Legged Jacket with Hollow Base Steel Caisson 4 Legged Jacket with Steel Caisson with Each Legs Mono Pile with Guy Wires The slender structure as proposed earlier are transversely supported by guy wires to reduce lateral deflection and bending stresses. Further the support reaction in terms of pile loads will be reduced considerably. 10

Focus of the development Understanding the requirements of marginal field. Developing new concepts to suit the west coast environmental parameters. Pile Loads and configurations will govern the economics of the concept. Pile Load distribution from past experience shows that Dead Load : 25% Facilities (Equipment) : 20% Wave + current Load : 50% Wind Load : 5% Installation costs for offshore platforms play a major role and hence installation by means of unconventional methods may need to be reviewed. Smaller Crane barges Item Cost Pipe lay Vessel with cranes Engineering 5% Jackups Structure 25% Self installation methods Equipment 25% 24 April 2007 Installation 50% 11

CONVENTIONAL WELLHEAD PLATFORMS Design life varies from 25-30 years. No. of wells varies from 4 16. Water depth ranges from 20m 100m. Two level deck with the dimension of 20m x 40m. Large space (40 x 20 ) for CTU operation Separate Helideck is provided. Platform crane provided. Boat landing is provided. Total topside weight is in the order of 2000 2500 Tonnes Modular rig such as Sundowner VI or VII is allowed. Unmanned platform with temporary two or four man bunk house MARGINAL FIELD WELLHEAD PLATFORMS Design life varies from 5 10 years. No. of wells varies from 2-4. Water depth ranges from 20m 60m. Two level deck with the dimension of 20m x 20m. No separate Helideck is provided. Main deck can be used as helideck. No Pedestal crane provided. V notch ladder type Boat landing is provided. Total topside weight is less than 750 Tonnes No Modular rig is allowed. Unmanned platform. No temporary bunk house provided. 12

Limiting Parameters Access to wells for drilling by jackup from north face, the skirt piles or projection of substructure on the north face to be avoided. The soil conditions and environmental parameters in shallow water is substantially different from conditions exist in many other parts of world Large deflection shall be avoided as the platform supports well heads. Dynamics of the slender platform shall be kept in mind to avoid resonant vibrations and subsequent fatigue related issues. Installation robustness to avoid delay in projects during execution 24 April 2007 13

Installation by Jackup rigs The cost optimization by means of unconventional installation spread was considered to be an option such as use of Jackups. Due to limitations on size of jackets / deck modules, jackups are not suitable. Height limitation due to vertical movement of jackup legs will be a constraint. Jackup foot print during installation may hamper future drilling activities. Hence use of small derrick barge / pipe lay vessels with crane capacity of 1200 Tonnes is found to be suitable for this type of installation. 24 April 2007 14

REPRESENTATIVE SITE Environmental conditions at C-series location has been considered for this study. The location selected has some of the difficult parameters to be used in design such as wave, current and geotechnical conditions. Similar conditions are expected at other marginal field. It can be observed that the top 30m is a soft clay offering very les pile capacity. Parameter 1 year return 100 year return Wave height (m) 10.366 17.073 Wave period (sec) 10.4 13.90 Surface current(m/sec) 1.341 1.768 Water depth (m) 30 30 Wind speed (km/h) (1-hr.Avg) 77 138 15

WAVE AND CURRENT 1 YEAR RETURN PERIOD (OPERATING) 16

WAVE & CURRENT 100 YEAR RETURN PERIOD (EXTREME STORM) 17

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 330 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge Mono Pile without Guy Wire Number of piles : 1 Main Pile Pile Diameter : 142 Penetration : 80m Pile Weight : 350 Tonnes Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1430 Tonnes : 6 Days : US$ 16M Risk : Large deflection Additional MSF required 18

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work Number of piles Pile Diameter Penetration Pile Weight Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 750 Tonnes : 370 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge : 1 Main & 2 Skirt Piles : 142 (Main) : 60 (Skirt) : 80m : 630 Tonnes : 1750 Tonnes : 12 Days : US$ 22M Braced Mono Tower (Inside Conductor) Critical fatigue Joint Risk : Fatigue at brace junction Additional MSF required 19

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 300 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge Braced Mono Tower (Outside Conductor) Number of piles : 1 Main & 2 Skirt Piles Pile Diameter : 60 Penetration : 80m Pile Weight : 470 Tonnes Critical fatigue Joint Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1520 Tonnes : 12 Days : US$ 21M Risk : Fatigue at brace junction Additional MSF required Conductors exposed to damage 20

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 460 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge 4 Legged Jacket Structure Number of piles : 4 Main Piles Pile Diameter : 60 Penetration : 80m Pile Weight : 640 Tonnes Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1850 Tonnes : 15 Days : US$ 25M Risk : Increased pile loads due to limited dimensions of jacket base 21

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 490 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge 4 Legged Jacket Structure with Batter piles Number of piles : 4 Main Piles Pile Diameter : 60 Penetration : 80m Pile Weight : 640 Tonnes Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1880 Tonnes : 15 Days : US$ 25M Risk Level : No major issues 22

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 350 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge 3 Legged Jacket Structure Number of piles : 3 Main Piles Pile Diameter : 60 Penetration : 88m Pile Weight : 510 Tonnes Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1610 Tonnes : 15 Days : US$ 23M Risk Level : Large Pile loads at south pile Installation difficulty 23

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 500 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge Braced Leg Jacket (4 Piles) Number of piles : 4 Skirt Piles Pile Diameter : 60 Penetration : 77m Pile Weight : 530 Tonnes Critical fatigue Joint Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1780 Tonnes : 15 Days : US$ 24M Risk Level : Conductor legs exposed for damage MSF is required Fatigue at brace junction 24

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 450 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge Braced Leg Jacket (3 Piles) Number of piles : 3 Skirt Piles Pile Diameter : 60 Penetration : 77m Pile Weight : 400 Tonnes Critical fatigue Joint Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1600 Tonnes : 12 Days : US$ 21M Risk Level : Conductor legs exposed for damage MSF is required Fatigue at brace junction Large pullout loads on south pile 25

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Caisson Weight Installation Offshore Work Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 750 Tonnes : 440 Tonnes : 400 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge : 1590 Tonnes : 18 Days : US$ 25M 4 Legged Jacket with Hollow Base Steel Caisson (with Guy Wire) Risks : Installation of guy systems Installation of large caisson Damage to guy wires Approach by boat Large anchor forces 26

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Caisson Weight Installation Offshore Work Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 750 Tonnes : 480 Tonnes : 250 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge : 1480 Tonnes : 18 Days : US$ 24M 4 Legged Jacket with Steel Caisson with Each Legs (with Guy Wire) Risks : Installation of guy systems Damage to guy wires Approach by boat Large anchor forces 27

Topside Weight Jacket Weight Installation Offshore Work : 750 Tonnes : 330 Tonnes : Crane Vessel : Crane Barge Mono Pile with Guy Wire Number of piles : 1 Main Pile Pile Diameter : 142 Penetration : 80m Pile Weight : 350 Tonnes Estimated Total Weight Estimated Offshore Time Estimated Cost : 1430 Tonnes : 15 Days : US$ 22M Risk : Installation of guy systems Damage to guy wires Approach by boat Large anchor forces 28

Weight Comparison S. No Description Jacket (MT) Pile (MT) Total (MT) Recommendation 1a Mono pile 330 350 680 Feasible for 1-2 conductors 1b Braced Mono tower (Inside Conductor) 370 630 1000 Recommended 1c Braced Mono tower (Outside Conductor) 300 470 770 Recommended with large diameter mono pile 2a 4 Legged Jacket Structure 460 640 1100 Recommended 2b 4 Legged Jacket Structure with 490 640 1130 Recommended Batter Piles 2c 3 Legged Jacket Structure 350 510 860 Not Recommended 3a Braced Legs (4 piles) 500 530 1030 Recommended 3b Braced Legs (3 piles) 450 400 850 Not Recommended 4a 4 Legged Jacket with Hollow Base Steel Caisson (Guy Wire) 440 400 840 Not Recommended 4b 4 Legged Jacket with Steel Caisson with Each Legs (Guy wire) 480 250 730 Not Recommended 4c Mono pile with Guywire 330 350 680 Not Recommended Variation of weight among the concepts is limited to 10 to 20% except for mono pile 29

Jacket concepts Braced conductors Guy wire concepts 30

Technical Feasibility Design of Mono pile and braced mono pile system has limitations on the deck foot print size. The concept can be adopted if the topside dimensions can be limited to less than 20m x 20m. Braced conductor leg concept can be implemented with sufficient conductor protection system which may alleviate the safety issue. The limitations on the deck foot print applies to this option also. Guy support structures require pile foundations for wire anchor system which will be costly. Further, guyed wire support systems not recommended based on installation and safety issues due to potential failure of guy wires. Hence an optimized conventional jacket will prove to be a potential candidate both in terms of safety and installation even though cost is slightly higher. Installation by jackup rigs shall be considered carefully only for water depths less than 30m. 31

Conclusions Mono pile with braced skirt pile system offers economical solution and can be installed by small derrick or pipe lay barge as the weight of each component is less than 650 Tonnes. Hence this can be implemented in upcoming marginal fields with water depth not exceeding 50m. For other marginal fields where water depth is greater than 50m, optimized jacket concepts are recommended. Braced conductor legs can be used with sufficient leg protection and fatigue design. 32

Thank you 33

Options Deflection for Various options X - deflection Y - Deflection Option Description (mm) (mm) Operating Storm Operating Storm 1a Monopile 282 1125 393 936 1b Braced Mono tower (3 piles)_inside Conductor 64 212 105 267 1c Braced Mono tower (3 piles)_outside Conductor 163 3783 207 647 2a 4 Legged Jacket Structure 85 486 149 426 2b 4 Legged Jacket Structure With Batter Piles 80 301 50 109 2c 3 Legged Jacket Structure 99 674 149 1190 3a Braced Legs (4 piles) 160 363 120 372 3b Braced Legs (3 piles) 175 476 149 622 4a 4 Legged Jacket with hollow base steel caisson 39 100 38 69 4b 4 Legged Jacket with steel caisson with each legs 14 42 17 30 4c Monopile with Guywire 20 99 27 83 34