Simplex method summary



Similar documents
Special Situations in the Simplex Algorithm

Chapter 6. Linear Programming: The Simplex Method. Introduction to the Big M Method. Section 4 Maximization and Minimization with Problem Constraints

Chapter 2 Solving Linear Programs

Standard Form of a Linear Programming Problem

Chapter 6: Sensitivity Analysis

Solving Linear Programs

Linear Programming. March 14, 2014

Practical Guide to the Simplex Method of Linear Programming

Reduced echelon form: Add the following conditions to conditions 1, 2, and 3 above:

Degeneracy in Linear Programming

56:171 Operations Research Midterm Exam Solutions Fall 2001

Linear Programming: Theory and Applications

1 Introduction. Linear Programming. Questions. A general optimization problem is of the form: choose x to. max f(x) subject to x S. where.

3. Evaluate the objective function at each vertex. Put the vertices into a table: Vertex P=3x+2y (0, 0) 0 min (0, 5) 10 (15, 0) 45 (12, 2) 40 Max

Linear Programming for Optimization. Mark A. Schulze, Ph.D. Perceptive Scientific Instruments, Inc.

Nonlinear Programming Methods.S2 Quadratic Programming

Using the Simplex Method to Solve Linear Programming Maximization Problems J. Reeb and S. Leavengood

Linear Programming. April 12, 2005

9.4 THE SIMPLEX METHOD: MINIMIZATION

IEOR 4404 Homework #2 Intro OR: Deterministic Models February 14, 2011 Prof. Jay Sethuraman Page 1 of 5. Homework #2

What is Linear Programming?

OPRE 6201 : 2. Simplex Method

Sensitivity Report in Excel

Linear Programming. Solving LP Models Using MS Excel, 18

4.6 Linear Programming duality

Linear Programming Notes VII Sensitivity Analysis

Operation Research. Module 1. Module 2. Unit 1. Unit 2. Unit 3. Unit 1

1 Solving LPs: The Simplex Algorithm of George Dantzig

Duality in Linear Programming

Linear Programming Problems

Sensitivity Analysis 3.1 AN EXAMPLE FOR ANALYSIS

LECTURE 5: DUALITY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS. 1. Dual linear program 2. Duality theory 3. Sensitivity analysis 4. Dual simplex method

Network Models 8.1 THE GENERAL NETWORK-FLOW PROBLEM

Linear Programming Notes V Problem Transformations

Special cases in Transportation Problems

Linear Programming I

0.1 Linear Programming

Solving Linear Programs in Excel

Linear Programming. Widget Factory Example. Linear Programming: Standard Form. Widget Factory Example: Continued.

Linear Programming in Matrix Form

GENERALIZED INTEGER PROGRAMMING

International Doctoral School Algorithmic Decision Theory: MCDA and MOO

LU Factorization Method to Solve Linear Programming Problem

Linear Programming II: Minimization 2006 Samuel L. Baker Assignment 11 is on page 16.

Lecture 3. Linear Programming. 3B1B Optimization Michaelmas 2015 A. Zisserman. Extreme solutions. Simplex method. Interior point method

. P. 4.3 Basic feasible solutions and vertices of polyhedra. x 1. x 2

4 UNIT FOUR: Transportation and Assignment problems

MATH2210 Notebook 1 Fall Semester 2016/ MATH2210 Notebook Solving Systems of Linear Equations... 3

A Labeling Algorithm for the Maximum-Flow Network Problem

Row Echelon Form and Reduced Row Echelon Form

2x + y = 3. Since the second equation is precisely the same as the first equation, it is enough to find x and y satisfying the system

15.053/8 February 26, 2013

Using EXCEL Solver October, 2000

The Graphical Method: An Example

Optimization Modeling for Mining Engineers

Systems of Linear Equations

Lecture 2: August 29. Linear Programming (part I)

Linear Programming. Before studying this supplement you should know or, if necessary, review

Offered to MAN ECN IRL THM IBT Elective. Course Level Course Code Year Semester ECTS Weekly Course Hours

Study Guide 2 Solutions MATH 111

Introduction to Linear Programming (LP) Mathematical Programming (MP) Concept

How To Understand And Solve A Linear Programming Problem

3. Linear Programming and Polyhedral Combinatorics

Solving Systems of Linear Equations

Question 2: How do you solve a linear programming problem with a graph?

Equilibrium computation: Part 1

Solutions Of Some Non-Linear Programming Problems BIJAN KUMAR PATEL. Master of Science in Mathematics. Prof. ANIL KUMAR

Algebra 2 Chapter 1 Vocabulary. identity - A statement that equates two equivalent expressions.

The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question. The total number of marks for this paper is 72.

Linear Programming Supplement E

a 11 x 1 + a 12 x a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x a 2n x n = b 2.

CHAPTER 11: BASIC LINEAR PROGRAMMING CONCEPTS

Simulating the Multiple Time-Period Arrival in Yield Management

Solving Systems of Linear Equations Using Matrices

Linear Program Solver

Decision Mathematics D1. Advanced/Advanced Subsidiary. Friday 12 January 2007 Morning Time: 1 hour 30 minutes. D1 answer book

Sensitivity Analysis with Excel

Dynamic Programming 11.1 AN ELEMENTARY EXAMPLE

Several Views of Support Vector Machines

CPLEX Tutorial Handout

Creating a More Efficient Course Schedule at WPI Using Linear Optimization

Chapter 13: Binary and Mixed-Integer Programming

24. The Branch and Bound Method

Chapter 5. Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming. Linear Programming in Two Dimensions: A Geometric Approach

EXCEL SOLVER TUTORIAL

OPTIMIZATION. Schedules. Notation. Index

This exposition of linear programming

PARALLELIZED SUDOKU SOLVING ALGORITHM USING OpenMP

Regression Clustering

Chapter 10: Network Flow Programming

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS

Can linear programs solve NP-hard problems?

Using CPLEX. =5 has objective value 150.

! Solve problem to optimality. ! Solve problem in poly-time. ! Solve arbitrary instances of the problem. !-approximation algorithm.

Chapter 2: Introduction to Linear Programming

7 Gaussian Elimination and LU Factorization

Transcription:

Simplex method summary Problem: optimize a linear objective, subject to linear constraints 1. Step 1: Convert to standard form: variables on right-hand side, positive constant on left slack variables for constraints surplus variables for constraints x = x x + with x, x + 0 if x unrestricted in standard form, all variables 0, all constraints equalities 2. Step 2: Add artificial variables: one for each constraint without a slack variable 3. Step 3: Create an objective constraint: add new variable z, and add new constraint z objective = 0 4. Step 4: Form the initial tableau: first column to identify basic variables last column for constants on right-hand sides of constraints in between, one column for each variable (beginning with z) first row for labels remaining rows for constraints (beginning with objective but see Step 5 below) 5. Step 5: Identify the initial objective function (z =?) if all constraints were, so slack variable in each constraint, use objective function from original problem if there are artificial variables, and M-method is being used, objective function is original objective plus large positive multiple of each artificial variable (if minimization problem) large negative multiple of each artificial variable (if maximization problem) if there are artificial variables, and two-phase method is being used, objective function is sum of artificial variables, and this should be minimized (whether or not original problem was minimization) 1

6. Step 6: Identify initial basic variables: slack variables together with artificial variables looking at constraint rows only in columns of these initial basic variables, should see permutation of columns of identity matrix label each constraint row by the basic variable occurring once in that row 7. Step 7: Modify the z-row if entry in z-row in column of basic variable is not zero, add appropriate multiple of the row in which that basic variable appears, so that entry becomes 0 at end of process, objective is expressed entirely in terms of non-basic variables if initial basic variables consist of all slack variables, this step not necessary 8. Step 8: Identify an entering basic variable and pivot column: maximization problem most negative coefficient in z-row minimization problem most positive coefficient in z-row break ties by choosing left-most column column of entering variable is pivot column if no entering variable, STOP optimum reached current basic feasible solution is optimal optimal objective value is last entry (solution column) of objective row 9. Step 9: Identify a departing basic variable and pivot row: for each non-basic variable, take ratio of entry in solution column and entry in pivot column non-basic variable with smallest non-negative ratio is departing variable, and corresponding row is pivot row break ties by choosing top-most column 10. Step 10: Pivot on pivot entry: pivot entry is intersection of pivot row and pivot column scale pivot row so pivot element is one add multiples of pivot row to other rows (including objective row) so rest of pivot column is zero change label of pivot row to that of entering variable 2

11. Step 11: Iterate: repeat steps 8 through 10 until optimal is reached if using M-method or all-slack starting solution, problem is completely done; if using two-phase method, go onto step 12 12. Step 12: Phase 2 of two-phase method: as long as phase 1 of two-phase method returns minimum of zero, continue to phase 2 create a new initial tableau objective row given by original objective of problem constraint rows given by constraint rows of final tableau of phase 1, with artificial columns removed initial basic variables given by basic variables at end of phase 1 go back to step 7 3

Four quirky situations 1. Degeneracy: can happen when more constraints meet at a point then would be normal (three or more two variable constraints, four or more three variable constraints, etc.) typically one of these constraints is redundant (its removal doesn t change the feasible space) at the degenerate point, one (or more) of the basic variables is zero, so in fact the same point corresponds to numerous basic feasible solutions occurs whenever there is a tie for departing variable at next iteration, entering variable will be constrained to enter at value zero simplex algorithm will move to a new basic feasible solution, but it s geometrically the same point, and the objective doesn t change typically, slows down simplex algorithm in worst case, can lead to cycling algorithm loops, staying at the same (suboptimal) point forever this is so wildly unlikely (and difficult to deal with) that no commercial implementation of simplex algorithm bothers to deal with it 4

2. Alternative optima: happens when one of the constraints which is satisfied tightly at the optimum is parallel to the objective there is more than one optimal basic feasible solution, and infinitely many optimum solutions that are not basic when optimality is reached, one (or more) of the non-basic variables has coefficient zero in objective each one can enter into the set of basic variables, without changing the objective value gives a variety of choices for optimum, some of which may be more desirable than others doesn t affect the running of the algorithm 3. Unbounded solution: happens when the constraints do not trap a finite region in space, but allow at least one variable to go to infinity inside feasible region the objective value can be made as large (or small, if a minimization problem) as one wishes when ratio test is being used to determine constraints on entering variable, all ratios are either negative or infinity the current entering variable is the one that can be made as large as desired suggests that the original problem may have been poorly posed, or fed into solver incorrectly simplex algorithm should be coded to stop when finding an unbounded variable 5

4. Unfeasible problem: happens when the constraints are inconsistent there is no feasible point that satisfies all the constraints cannot occur when all constraints are, because all-zero solution (allslack solution) is feasible in this case occurs only when M-method or two-phase method are being used M-method: no matter how large M is, one of the artificial variables is always basic in optimum solution two-phase method: phase 1 ends by discovering that minimum of sum of artificial variables is positive suggests that the original problem may have been poorly posed, or fed into solver incorrectly 6