New group D streptococcal species



Similar documents
Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics

Medical Microbiology Culture Media :

SSI STREPTOCOCCUS LATEX GROUP KIT

Taxonomy, Classification & Identification. Narelle George Microbiology, Queensland Health Pathology Service, QHPS-Central

IDENTIFICATION OF UNKNOWN BACTERIA

Normal flora, which make up about 90% of the cells of a human body, are microbes that

Raw Milk Quality Tests Do They Predict Fluid Milk Shelf-life or Is it time for new tests?

IDENTIFICATION OF UNKNOWN BACTERIA

Introduction to Bioinformatics 3. DNA editing and contig assembly

Lab 2/Phylogenetics/September 16, PHYLOGENETICS

Laboratory Exercise # 11: Differentiation of the Species Staphylococcus and Streptococcus

Classification of Microorganisms (Chapter 10) Lecture Materials for Amy Warenda Czura, Ph.D. Suffolk County Community College Eastern Campus

Recombinant DNA Unit Exam

Metabolism Dr.kareema Amine Al-Khafaji Assistant professor in microbiology, and dermatologist Babylon University, College of Medicine, Department of

EU Reference Laboratory for E. coli Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Unit of Foodborne Zoonoses Istituto Superiore di Sanità

LABORATORY PROCEDURE BBL Pneumoslide Test for Streptococcus pneumoniae

Isolation and Identification of Bacteria Present in the Activated Sludge Unit, in the Treatment of Industrial Waste Water

BD Modified CNA Agar BD Modified CNA Agar with Crystal Violet

HCS Exercise 1 Dr. Jones Spring Recombinant DNA (Molecular Cloning) exercise:

Medical Microbiology Microscopic slides and media

BacReady TM Multiplex PCR System

19th Swiss TB Symposium Münchenwiler,

Enteric Unknowns Miramar College Biology 205 Microbiology

ID kit. imegen Anchovies II. and E. japonicus) DNA detection by. User manual. Anchovies species (E. encrasicolus. sequencing.

European Medicines Agency

IIID 14. Biotechnology in Fish Disease Diagnostics: Application of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

SELECTIVE AND DIFFERENTIAL MEDIA

Molecular typing of VTEC: from PFGE to NGS-based phylogeny

Forensic DNA Testing Terminology

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE Q5B

HuCAL Custom Monoclonal Antibodies

Integrated Protein Services

4. DNA replication Pages: Difficulty: 2 Ans: C Which one of the following statements about enzymes that interact with DNA is true?

Direct Testing Systems and Serology

Next Generation Sequencing

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J10

Module 3 Questions. 7. Chemotaxis is an example of signal transduction. Explain, with the use of diagrams.

Custom Antibody Services

Lab Exercise 2 Media and Culture

STRUCTURES OF NUCLEIC ACIDS

Identification of the VTEC serogroups mainly associated with human infections by conventional PCR amplification of O-associated genes

Molecular Analysis of Phytase Gene Cloned. from Bacillus subtilis

Recombinant DNA & Genetic Engineering. Tools for Genetic Manipulation

Typing in the NGS era: The way forward!

Essentials of Real Time PCR. About Sequence Detection Chemistries

PrimeSTAR HS DNA Polymerase

Data Analysis for Ion Torrent Sequencing

How many of you have checked out the web site on protein-dna interactions?

4. Why are common names not good to use when classifying organisms? Give an example.

REAL TIME PCR USING SYBR GREEN

WJEC AS Biology Biodiversity & Classification (2.1 All Organisms are related through their Evolutionary History)

PATHOGEN DETECTION SYSTEMS BY REAL TIME PCR. Results Interpretation Guide

Procedures For DNA Sequencing

First Strand cdna Synthesis

DNA and Forensic Science

National Zoonoses Conference (NZC), O Reilly Hall, University College Dublin, Wednesday-8 th June, 2011.

GenScript BloodReady TM Multiplex PCR System

Next Generation Sequencing Technologies in Microbial Ecology. Frank Oliver Glöckner

ENUMERATION OF SULPHITE-REDUCING CLOSTRIDIA FROM DRINKING WATER AND RIVERS IN BASRAH CITY USING MODIFIED DRCM MEDIUM

HuCAL Custom Monoclonal Antibodies

LAB 4. Cultivation of Bacteria INTRODUCTION

R. Landstorfer et al. BMC Genomics, Audrey Segura

Sequence Formats and Sequence Database Searches. Gloria Rendon SC11 Education June, 2011

NO CALCULATORS OR CELL PHONES ALLOWED

Genetic Technology. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology

Bacillus Subtilis Expression Vectors. Product Information and Instructions November 2005

TIANquick Mini Purification Kit

Twincore - Zentrum für Experimentelle und Klinische Infektionsforschung Institut für Molekulare Bakteriologie

Ms. Campbell Protein Synthesis Practice Questions Regents L.E.

Applications for MALDI-TOF MS in Clinical Microbiology. MALDI-TOF is not a Cocktail. The Ideal Identification System 9/10/2012

CHAPTER 6 ANTIBODY GENETICS: ISOTYPES, ALLOTYPES, IDIOTYPES

Protein Sequence Analysis - Overview -

Cloning Blunt-End Pfu DNA Polymerase- Generated PCR Fragments into pgem -T Vector Systems

Co Extra (GM and non GM supply chains: Their CO EXistence and TRAceability) Outcomes of Co Extra

QBOL, DNA barcodes to identify phytobacteria subjected to EU quarantine regulations

Bioinformatics Grid - Enabled Tools For Biologists.

Reliable PCR Components for Molecular Diagnostic Assays

Integrated Protein Services

Just the Facts: A Basic Introduction to the Science Underlying NCBI Resources

Innovations in Molecular Epidemiology

STUDIES ON SEED STORAGE PROTEINS OF SOME ECONOMICALLY MINOR PLANTS

Course Curriculum for Master Degree in Medical Laboratory Sciences/Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Serology

TOOLS FOR T-RFLP DATA ANALYSIS USING EXCEL

About Our Products. Blood Products. Purified Infectious/Inactivated Agents. Native & Recombinant Viral Proteins. DNA Controls and Primers for PCR

Changing Concept of FMD diagnostics: from Central to Local. Aniket Sanyal Project Directorate on FMD Mukteswar, India

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGY

Introduction. Preparation of Template DNA

Transcription:

Indian J Med Res 119 (Suppl) May 2004, pp 252-256 New group D streptococcal species Laurent Schlegel *, Francine Grimont, Patrick A. Grimont & Anne Bouvet* * Centre National de Référence des Streptocoques, Service de Microbiologie, Hôtel Dieu AP-HP, Université Paris V & Unité Biodiversité des Bactéries Pathogènes Emergentes, INSERM U389, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France Received August 6, 2003 Background & objectives: The heterogeneity of group D streptococci led to the identification of various biotypes of Streptococcus equinus and Streptococcus bovis and to the description of new species. The objective of the present study was to improve the phenotypic delineation between species and to clarify their respective phylogenetic position. Methods: Physiological and genomic analyses were carried out in 84 representative strains of the group D streptococci. Biotypes were determined with the API 20 strep and rapid ID 32 STREP systems of identification. Quantitative DNA-DNA hybridization under stringent conditions and values of the DT m allowed to delineate species and subspecies. The phylogenic position of the different genomic groups was determined by comparing the sequences of their 16S rdna. Results: Four DNA-clusters, including seven species or subspecies, were characterized. Differential associations of biochemical characters allowed their identification. S. equinus and the type strain of S. bovis belonged to a single species. S. gallolyticus, S. bovis biotype II.2, and S. macedonicus formed a single DNA-cluster including three different subspecies. These were designated as S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus, S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus, and S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus. The two other DNA-clusters corresponded to the two subspecies of S. infantarius, and to S. alactolyticus. Interpretation & conclusion: This study presented a new classification associated with an identification scheme of group D streptococci. The changes in this classification demonstrate the interest of a polyphagic approach of the bacterial identification. Key words Group D streptococci - Streptococcus bovis - S. equinus - S. gallolyticus - S. infantarius - taxonomy Group D streptococci, the common inhabitants of the intestinal flora of vertebrates, were first identified by their antigenic and biochemical characteristics 1,2. Genomic studies confirmed the separation of enterococci from non enterococci 3,4. The group D streptococcal strains were then commonly designated as S. equinus or S. bovis depending on their origin and on their biochemical characteristics. Identification of S. bovis strains was based on their phenotype. Biotypes I and II designated mannitol-positive and mannitol-negative strains, respectively. Biotype II included two different phenotypes according to the presence (biotype II.2) or absence (biotype II.1) of b-glucuronidase 5. 252 In 1984, a genomic classification of the S. equinus / S. bovis complex delineated six different DNAgroups 6. The group 1 included both S. equinus and some biotype II.1 S. bovis strains. The groups 2, 3, and 4 corresponded to different unnamed genospecies. The group 6 was called S. alactolyticus, whereas the group 5 (S. saccharolyticus) was further included in the Enterococcus genus 7. Correlation studies between the genomic classification and the biotypes led to identify phenotypic variants, which were progressively described as individual species or subspecies. The DNA-group 2 (S. bovis biotype I) was

called S. gallolyticus 8 ; it is associated with endocarditis and colonic carcinoma 9. The DNA-group 4 was called S. infantarius 10 ; it includes two subspecies of medical importance 11. Two additional species S. macedonicus 12 and S. waius 13 were further described. Using DNA-DNA hybridization and 16S rdna sequencing, we confirmed that S. macedonicus and S. waius were subjective synonyms, and demonstrated that S. bovis biotype II.2 and S. macedonicus were subspecies of a same DNA-cluster, which included the previously described S. gallolyticus 14. Here, we reappraise the classification of the S. bovis/s. equinus complex with the objective to improve the phenotypic delineation between species and to clarify their respective phylogenetic position. Material & Methods Representative strains (n=84) of the DNA-groups 1, 2, 4, and 6, and of the new species were obtained from various collections. They were identified as group D streptococci by conventional methods 15. Production of enzymes and fermentation of carbohydrates were determined using both the Api 20 Strep and rapid ID32 STREP identification systems (BioMérieux, France). Hydrolysis of methyl-gallate was assayed by the colorimetric test 8. The DNA was extracted and purified using the phenol/chloroform method 16. DNA from type or reference strains were labeled by using the Megaprim DNA labeling reaction kit (Amersham, UK). Quantitative DNA-DNA hybridization was carried out in a liquid medium under stringent conditions of 60 C for 16 h, according to a modification of the S1-nuclease/ trichloracetic acid precipitation method 17. The temperature (T m ), at which 50 per cent of the reassociated DNA is hydrolysed by the S1-nuclease, was determined. The difference (DT m ) between the melting temperatures of homo- and heteroduplexes allowed to quantify the DNA divergence between strains with high level of DNA homology 17. Polymerase chain amplification of 16S rrna encoding DNA, and sequencing of amplified fragments were carried out as previously described 18. Alignment SCHLEGEL et al: GROUP D STREPTOCOCCI 253 with a selection of the available sequences of 16S rdna from GeneBank and phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rdna data were performed by using the Clustal multiple sequence method with the Megalign program from the DNAstar package. A distance matrix was computed using a Kimura model for nucleotide substitution. A phylogenetic tree was generated from the distance matrices using the neighbour joining method. Results & Discussion Phenotypic characterization: The phenotypic tests confirmed that all strains were group D streptococci. None of them grew on bile-esculine agar and in 6.5 per cent NaCl broth. They produced leucine aminopeptidase, alanyl-phenylalanyl-proline arylamidase, and acetoin. They did not produce pyrrolidonyl-arylamidase and arginine dihydrolase. Our results confirmed that S. equinus and S. bovis differed by classical characters. The species and subspecies exhibited noticeable differences (Table). The major differential associations were: (i) acidification of mannitol and hydrolysis of gallate by S. gallolyticus ; (ii) presence of b-glucuronidase and b-mannosidase, and acidification of trehalose by S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus (S. bovis biotype II.2); (iii) absence of b-glucosidase and b-glucuronidase, with presence of b-galactosidase by S. gallollyticus subsp. macedonicus; (iv) absence of b-glucosidase by most strains of S. infantarius subsp. infantarius, associated with the absence of b-glucuronidase and b-galactosidase, and with the acidification of glycogen and raffinose; (v) presence of b-glucosidase, and acidification of methyl-b-glucopyranoside, but not of glycogen and raffinose by S. infantarius subsp. coli; (vi) absence of acidification of most of the carbohydrates, including lactose by S. alactolyticus. DNA-DNA hybridization: The existence of four DNA homology groups within the S. bovis/s. equinus complex was demonstrated. DNA-cluster I is formed by the strains of S. equinus and the type-strain of S. bovis (91 to 100% DNA homology) Type strains of the former S. gallolyticus, S. macedonicus, and S. waius species, and the strains of S. bovis biotype II.2 belonged to the same DNA-cluster II. This cluster contained three different subgroups. The level of homology between strains was over 77 per cent (DT m 2 C) within each subgroup, and ranged from 48 to 93 per cent (DT m 6 C)

254 INDIAN J MED RES (SUPPL) MAY 2004 Table. Differential biochemical characteristics of group D streptococcal strains S. equinus S. gallolyticus subsp. S. infantarius subsp. S. alactolyticus / S. bovis gallolyticus pasteurianus macedonicus infantarius coli No. of strains n = 9 + 8 n = 13 n = 21 n = 5 n =10 n = 14 n = 4 Hydrolysis of Aesculine + + + - V + + Gallate - + - - - - - Production of ß-glucosidase + + + - V + + ß-glucuronidase - - + - - - - a-galactosidase - / + + v v + + + ß-galactosidase (ß-GAR) - - - + - - - ß-galactosidase (ß-GAL) - - + v - - - ß-mannosidase - V + - - - - Acidification of Starch - / + + - + + v - Glycogen - / + + - - + - - Inulin - / + + - - - - - Lactose - / + + + + + + - Mannitol - + - - - - - Meth-ß-D-glucopyranoside + + + - - + V Raffinose - / + + v - + - - Trehalose v + + - - - - +, ³ 80% of positive reactions; -, 20% of positive reaction; v, 21 to 79% of positive reactions

between the different subgroups. The first subgroup includes the reference strain of the DNA-group 2 of Farrow et al 6, and the type strains of S. gallolyticus and S. caprinus. The second subgroup included the type strains of S. macedonicus and S. waius. The last subgroup was formed by S. bovis II.2, including the type strain of S. pasteurianus described independently as a new species 19. The DT m 6 C indicating the strong affinity of heteroduplexes constructed with the strains of the different subgroups, we proposed to name the three subspecies: S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus, macedonicus, and pasteurianus. The DNA-cluster III included S. infantarius subsp. infantarius and subsp. coli. The DNA-cluster IV corresponded to S. alactolyticus. 16S rdna sequencing and phylogenetic analysis: We added in the Genbank databank the sequences of 16S rdna that we have determined 14. The 99 per cent similarity of the sequence of 1455 base fragments of the type strains of S. equinus and S. bovis confirmed them to belong to the same species. Similarly, the 99.6 per cent homology between the two type strains of S. alactolyticus 6 and S. intestinalis 20 was in agreement with their closely related whole-cell proteins patterns 21. We constructed a phylogenetic tree from the sequences of 350 to 400 bp from our results and from those from previouly described type strains (Fig.). Three major divisions corresponding to the four DNA-clusters were observed. The first division included the type strains of S. equinus and S. bovis (DNA-cluster I), and the two subspecies of S. infantarius (DNA-cluster III). The second division includes the three subspecies of Fig. Simplified phylogenetic tree of group D streptococci based on comparative analysis of 350-400 bp 16S rdna sequences. SCHLEGEL et al: GROUP D STREPTOCOCCI 255 S. gallolyticus (DNA-cluster II). Within this cluster II, the divergence between the 16S rdna sequences from the type or reference strains of S. gallolyticus, S. macedonicus, and S. bovis biotype II.2 were in agreement with the delineation of the three subspecies, whereas the 99.5 per cent similarity of sequences between S. waius and S. macedonicus confirmed that they belonged to a single genomic group, as recently reported by Manachini et al 22. The third division included S. alactolyticus and the subjective synonym S. intestinalis (DNA-cluster IV). This study presents a new classification associated with an identification scheme of group D streptococci. Seven species or subspecies could be identified according to differential biochemical reactions. The changes in this classification of the S. bovis/s. equinus complex demonstrate the interest of a polyphasic approach of the bacterial identification. References 1. Lancefield RC. A serological differentiation of human and other groups of haemolytic streptococci. J Exp Med 1933; 57 : 571-95. 2. Facklam RR. Recognition of group D streptococcal species of human origin by biochemical and physiological tests. Appl Microbiol 1972; 23 : 1131-9. 3. Kilpper-Bälz R, Fischer G, Schleifer KH. Nucleic acid hybridization of group N and group D streptococci. Curr Microbiol 1982; 7 : 245-50. 4. Bentley RW, Leigh JA, Collins MD. Intrageneric structure of Streptococcus based on comparative analysis of small-subunit rrna sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41 : 487-94. 5. Coykendall AL, Gustafson KB. Deoxyribonucleic acid hybridizations among strains of Streptococcus salivarius and Streptococcus bovis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1985; 35 : 274-80. 6. Farrow JAE, Kruze J, Phillips BA, Bramley AJ, Collins MD. Taxonomic studies on Streptococcus bovis and Streptococcus equinus: description of Streptococcus alactolyticus sp. nov. and Streptococcus saccharolyticus sp. nov. System Appl Microbiol 1984; 5 : 467-82. 7. Rodriguez U, Collins MD. Phylogenic analysis of Streptococcus saccharolyticus based on 16S rrna sequencing. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 71 : 231-4. 8. Osawa R, Fujisawa T, Sly LI. Streptococcus gallolyticus sp. nov.; gallate degrading organisms formerly assigned to Streptococcus bovis. System Appl Microbiol 1995; 18 : 74-8. 9. Klein RS, Recco RA, Catalano MT, Edberg SC, Casey JI, Steigbigel NH. Association of Streptococcus bovis with carcinoma of the colon. New Eng J Med 1977; 297 : 800-2.

256 INDIAN J MED RES (SUPPL) MAY 2004 10. Bouvet A, Grimont F, Collins MD, Benaoudia F, Devine C, Regnault B, et al. Streptococcus infantarius sp. nov. related to S. bovis and S. equinus. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997; 418 : 393-5. 11. Schlegel L, Grimont F, Collins MD, Régnault B, Grimont PAD, Bouvet A. Streptococcus infantarius sp. nov., Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius subsp. nov., and Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli subsp. nov., isolated from humans and food. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 : 1425-34. 12. Tsakalidou E, Zoidou E, Pot B, Wassil L, Ludwig W, Devriese LA, et al. Identification of streptococci from Greek Kasseri cheese and description of Streptococcus macedonicus sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48 : 519-27. 13. Flint SH, Ward LJH, Brooks JD. Streptococcus waius sp. nov., a thermophilic streptococcus from a biofilm. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 : 759-67. 14. Schlegel L, Grimont F, Ageron E, Grimont PA, Bouvet A. Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the Streptococcus bovis/ Streptococcus equinus complex and related species description of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. nov., S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus subsp. nov., and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 53 (Pt 3) : 631-45. 15. Facklam RR, Washington JA II. Streptococcus and related catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci. In : Balows A, Hausler WJ, Herrmann KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology, 5th ed. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1991 p. 238-57. 16. Grimont F, Grimont PAD. Determination of rrna gene restriction patterns. In : Howard J, Withcombe DM, editors. Diagnostic bacteriology protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc; 1995 p. 149-64. 17. Grimont PAD, Popoff MY, Grimont F, Coynault C, Lemelin M. Reproducibility and correlation study of three deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization procedures. Curr Microbiol 1980; 4 : 325-30. 18. Janvier M, Grimont PA. The genus Methylophaga, a new line of descent within phylogenic branch g of Proteobacteria. Res Microbiol 1995; 146 : 543-50. 19. Poyart C, Quesne G, Trieu-Cuot P. Taxonomic dissection of the Streptococcus bovis group by analysis of manganese-dependant superoxide dismutase gene (SodA) sequences : reclassification of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli as Streptococcus lutetiensis sp. nov. and of Streptococcus bovis biotype 11.2 as Streptococcus pasteurianus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52 :1247-55. 20. Robinson IM, Stromley JM, Varel VH, Cati EP. Streptococcus intestinalis, a new species from the colons and feces of pigs. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38 : 245-8. 21. Vandamme P, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F, Kersters K. Streptococcus intestinalis (Robinson et al. 1988) and Streptococcus alactolyticus (Farrow et al. 1984) are phenotypically indistinguishable. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 : 737-41. 22. Manachini PL, Flint SH, Ward LJH, Kelly W, Fortina MG, Parini C, et al. Comparison between Streptococcus macedonicus and Streptococcus waius strains and reclassification of Streptococcus waius (Flint et al. 1999) as Streptococcus macedonicus (Tsakalidou et al 1998). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52 : 945-51. Reprint requests: Prof. Anne Bouvet, Centre National de Référence des Streptocoques, Service de Microbiologie, Hôtel Dieu Paris VI University,1, place du Parvis Notre-Dame, F-75181 Paris 04, France e-mail: anne.bouvet@htd.ap-hop-paris.fr