Volcanic Ash Monitoring: Product Guide



Similar documents
Active Fire Monitoring: Product Guide

Best practices for RGB compositing of multi-spectral imagery

EUMETSAT Satellite Programmes

Satellite Remote Sensing of Volcanic Ash

Night Microphysics RGB Nephanalysis in night time

Studying cloud properties from space using sounder data: A preparatory study for INSAT-3D

Outline of RGB Composite Imagery

Overview of the IR channels and their applications

MSG MPEF Products focus on GII Simon Elliott Meteorological Operations Division

SAFNWC/MSG Cloud type/height. Application for fog/low cloud situations

Satellite remote sensing using AVHRR, ATSR, MODIS, METEOSAT, MSG

GOES-R AWG Cloud Team: ABI Cloud Height

SATELLITE OBSERVATION OF THE DAILY VARIATION OF THIN CIRRUS

Evaluation of the Effect of Upper-Level Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Retrievals of Low-Level Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

THE USE OF THE HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE IN SAFNWC/MSG CLOUD MASK

Clear Sky Radiance (CSR) Product from MTSAT-1R. UESAWA Daisaku* Abstract

Cloud Masking and Cloud Products

ECMWF Aerosol and Cloud Detection Software. User Guide. version /01/2015. Reima Eresmaa ECMWF

How To Understand Cloud Properties From Satellite Imagery

USING THE GOES 3.9 µm SHORTWAVE INFRARED CHANNEL TO TRACK LOW-LEVEL CLOUD-DRIFT WINDS ABSTRACT

Evaluations of the CALIPSO Cloud Optical Depth Algorithm Through Comparisons with a GOES Derived Cloud Analysis

The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service

The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service

Sentinel-3 Marine Test Data Set processed at EUMETSAT

Comparison of NOAA's Operational AVHRR Derived Cloud Amount to other Satellite Derived Cloud Climatologies.

Improved diagnosis of low-level cloud from MSG SEVIRI data for assimilation into Met Office limited area models

VIIRS-CrIS mapping. NWP SAF AAPP VIIRS-CrIS Mapping

MSG-SEVIRI cloud physical properties for model evaluations

GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document For Low Cloud and Fog

TerraColor White Paper

Measurement of the effect of biomass burning aerosol on inhibition of cloud formation over the Amazon

REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUD-AEROSOL RADIATIVE EFFECTS FROM SATELLITE DATA: A CASE STUDY OVER THE SOUTH OF PORTUGAL

The impact of window size on AMV

Comparison between current and future environmental satellite imagers on cloud classification using MODIS

METEOSAT. Europe s geostationary

CALCULATION OF CLOUD MOTION WIND WITH GMS-5 IMAGES IN CHINA. Satellite Meteorological Center Beijing , China ABSTRACT

An Introduction to the MTG-IRS Mission

Synoptic assessment of AMV errors

Validation of SEVIRI cloud-top height retrievals from A-Train data

3.4 Cryosphere-related Algorithms

2.3 Spatial Resolution, Pixel Size, and Scale

Multiangle cloud remote sensing from

Suman Goyal Sc E /In-charge SYNOPTIC Application Unit Satellite Meteorology Davison

Towards assimilating IASI satellite observations over cold surfaces - the cloud detection aspect

Denis Botambekov 1, Andrew Heidinger 2, Andi Walther 1, and Nick Bearson 1

SATELLITE IMAGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA PROCESSING

A remote sensing instrument collects information about an object or phenomenon within the

RESULTS FROM A SIMPLE INFRARED CLOUD DETECTOR

Nowcasting applications. Hungarian Meteorological Service

Cloud Climatology for New Zealand and Implications for Radiation Fields

Passive Remote Sensing of Clouds from Airborne Platforms

Clouds and the Energy Cycle

WATER BODY EXTRACTION FROM MULTI SPECTRAL IMAGE BY SPECTRAL PATTERN ANALYSIS

ESCI 107/109 The Atmosphere Lesson 2 Solar and Terrestrial Radiation

Data processing (3) Cloud and Aerosol Imager (CAI)

METEOSAT 8 SEVIRI and NOAA AVHRR Cloud Products. A Climate Monitoring SAF Comparison Study. Meteorologi. Sheldon Johnston and Karl-Göran Karlsson

Climatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula

Assessing Cloud Spatial and Vertical Distribution with Infrared Cloud Analyzer

Generation of Cloud-free Imagery Using Landsat-8

AATSR Technical Note. Improvements to the AATSR IPF relating to Land Surface Temperature Retrieval and Cloud Clearing over Land

Energy Pathways in Earth s Atmosphere

Precipitation Remote Sensing

FRESCO. Product Specification Document FRESCO. Authors : P. Wang, R.J. van der A (KNMI) REF : TEM/PSD2/003 ISSUE : 3.0 DATE :

Selecting the appropriate band combination for an RGB image using Landsat imagery

Obtaining and Processing MODIS Data

Cloud Thickness Estimation from GOES-8 Satellite Data Over the ARM-SGP Site

ATM S 111, Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast

Cloud detection by using cloud cost for AIRS: Part 1

Technical note on MISR Cloud-Top-Height Optical-depth (CTH-OD) joint histogram product

Cloud detection and clearing for the MOPITT instrument

The Sentinel-4/UVN instrument on-board MTG-S

Advances in Cloud Imager Remote Sensing

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) and Remote Sensing

Received in revised form 24 March 2004; accepted 30 March 2004

Let s consider a homogeneous medium characterized by the extinction coefficient β ext, single scattering albedo ω 0 and phase function P(µ, µ').

Fourth Cloud Retrieval Evaluation Workshop 4-7 March 2014, Grainau, Germany

NCDC s SATELLITE DATA, PRODUCTS, and SERVICES

Estimating Firn Emissivity, from 1994 to1998, at the Ski Hi Automatic Weather Station on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Using Passive Microwave Data

CERES Edition 2 & Edition 3 Cloud Cover, Cloud Altitude and Temperature

DISCRIMINATING CLEAR-SKY FROM CLOUD WITH MODIS ALGORITHM THEORETICAL BASIS DOCUMENT (MOD35) MODIS Cloud Mask Team

163 ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND REMOTELY SENSED TEMPERATURE OBSERVATIONS

152 OBJECTIVE, AUTOMATIC TRACKING OF PRE-GENESIS TROPICAL DISTURBANCES WITHIN THE DEVIATION ANGLE VARIANCE METHOD

Introduction to teledection

Remote Sensing of Contrails and Aircraft Altered Cirrus Clouds

Treasure Hunt. Lecture 2 How does Light Interact with the Environment? EMR Principles and Properties. EMR and Remote Sensing

DATA ACCESS AT EUMETSAT

Landsat Monitoring our Earth s Condition for over 40 years

Transcription:

Doc.No. Issue : : EUM/TSS/MAN/15/802120 v1a EUMETSAT Eumetsat-Allee 1, D-64295 Darmstadt, Germany Tel: +49 6151 807-7 Fax: +49 6151 807 555 Date : 2 June 2015 http://www.eumetsat.int WBS/DBS : EUMETSAT The copyright of this document is the property of EUMETSAT.

Document Change Record Issue / Revision Date DCN. No 1 06/10/2010 Initial release. Summary of Changes 1A 28/05/2015 Change of title from Factsheet. Added the following sections: Product Description, Abbreviated algorithm, reference document, Known operation limitations. Scientific review completed. Table of Contents 1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION... 3 2 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS... 4 2.1 Known Operational Limitations... 4 3 PRODUCT ILLUSTRATION... 5 4 BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE VOL ALGORITHM... 7 4.1 Processing mask... 7 4.2 Ash detection... 7 4.3 Ash retrieval... 8 5 REFERENCES AND PRODUCT ASSISTANCE... 9 Online Resources and Assistance... 9 Page 2 of 10

1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Volcanic ash plumes have been monitored with geostationary satellite images since the late 1970s. However, it is difficult to distinguish between ash plumes and thin cirrus clouds or even the underlying surface using single band infrared and visible images. Split-window techniques were introduced using channels at 11 µm and 12 µm wavelength to better detect ash plumes. This technique is also called reverse absorption and is based on the principle that the absorption of clouds, which are made of ice and water, is higher in the channel at 12 µm than the channel near 11 µm. Ash plumes have exactly the opposite characteristics. Using the geostationary MSG satellite, additional multi-spectral approaches can be tested to support and improve the split-window technique. For example, some constituents of the ash clouds such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) or sulfates can be detected in addition by channels in the 3.9 and 8.7 µm bands, i.e. MSG channels IR3.9 and IR8.7. In addition to the IR channels, the visible channels can be used during daylight. The single-scattering Albedo of water and ice clouds decreases with wavelength, while the single-scattering Albedo of an ash cloud remains constant or increases even slightly. With the ratio of the solar contribution in channel IR3.9 with the visible channel VIS0.6, ash clouds can be separated from ice or water clouds. The Volcanic Ash Detection product (VOL) is restricted to those National Meteorological Services that are members of EUMETSAT. The ash detection is based on a reversed split window technique, supported by tests in the other IR channels and two VIS channels. The execution of the ash detection algorithm covers the area of the Earth disk as seen by Meteosat. The CAP-formatted product provides e.g. an ash cloud load for an area defined by a polygon. For the detected cloud pixels, the VOL algorithm uses the following criteria to check for ash cloud pixels: Reflectance ratio IR3.9(solar component)/vis0.6 (daylight and twilight only) Brightness temperature difference of channels IR3.9 and IR10.8 (night only) Brightness temperature difference of channels IR8.7 and IR10.8 Brightness temperature difference of channels IR12.0 and IR10.8 The main two tests for ash cloud detection are the reflectance ratio test IR3.9 (solar)/vis0.6 and the brightness temperature difference test of channels IR12.0 and IR10.8. While the reflectance ratio test can almost clearly separate all ash clouds from other clouds, the brightness temperature difference test IR12.0 - IR10.8 may have similar differences for thin ice and water clouds as for ash clouds. For that reason, there is a need to filter out miss-classified ash clouds/ice clouds during night, when the reflectance ratio test cannot be used. Therefore, the algorithm uses the two additional further brightness temperature difference tests. Page 3 of 9

2 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS Category Product users Input satellite data Product Distribution Product Area Product Resolution Product Distribution Frequency Product Names Product Size Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre Specification National Meteorological Services of the EUMETSAT member states. European Volcano Observatory Space Services (EVOSS) The reflectances in the VIS0.6 and the IR3.9 channels The brightness temperatures in the IR3.9, IR8.7, IR10.8 and IR12:0 channels; The solar zenith angle on pixel level; The ECMWF forecast for the determination of the expected brightness temperatures to be used in for several thresholds for the ash detection. EUMETCast (NMS restricted) on Alert Channel EUMETCast (to restricted user community) EUMETSAT Data Centre Full-earth scanning CAP Format: see general description ASCII Format: pixel (EUMETSAT Data Centre) netcdf Format: pixel CAP Format: every repeat cycle to EUMETCast and EUMETSAT Data Centre when activated netcdf Format: every repeat cycle to EUMETCast EUMETCast FES Area in CAP format: L-000-MSG2 -MPEF -VOLC -000001-00611130545- EUMETCast FES Area in netcdf format: L-000-MSG2 -MPEF -VOLE -000001-200611130545- Variable 2.1 Known Operational Limitations The operational status of the product has been declared as demonstrational. Very thin ash is not detected. Ice embedded in the ash cloud may obscure the ash signal. False alarms are likely. Page 4 of 9

3 PRODUCT ILLUSTRATION An example for the volcanic ash monitoring is given for the Karthala eruption on November 25, 2005. Karthala is situated at 11.75º S and 43.38º E in the Indian Ocean and is one of the largest active volcanoes in the world. As there has not been any significant coverage of high clouds in the area at the time of the eruption, it was possible to monitor the eruption using Metosat-8 images right from the beginning of the event. Figure 1: Animation of the Karthala eruption using the Ash RGB combination range. Figure 1 shows a still shot of the animation of this eruption using the Ash RGB combination image and the channel combination IR12.0 IR10.8, IR10.8 IR8.7 and IR10.8. To see animations and pictures of other eruptions, type Ash Plume into the Search field on the EUMETSAT web site. This Ash RGB exploits the fact that thin ash clouds tend to have a positive brightness temperature difference (BTD) between IR12.0 and IR10.8, while water/ice clouds, particularly thin clouds, have a negative BTD. Thus, thin ash clouds have a strong reddish colour, while water/ice clouds have less red; particularly thin ice clouds which appear very dark. In the case of the Karthala ash cloud shown above and in Figure 2, the BTD between IR12.0 and IR10.8 reached values of about +3 K in the early eruption phase. Other volcanic eruptions have had even higher values, in some cases +10 K. Page 5 of 9

An example of the derived VOL product is given in below for the 12:00 UTC repeat cycle, with the following colour coding: Blue is clear ocean. Green is clear land. White is clouds. Grey is clouds within the search area. Orange is the ash plume. The red dot on the island marks the detected hotspot of the volcano. Figure 2: Derived VOL product for the 12:00 UTC Repeat Cycle. Page 6 of 9

4 BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE VOL ALGORITHM The volcanic ash cloud detection algorithm is based on the work of the SAFNWC, and of Jochen Kerkmann (EUMETSAT) and Fred Prata (Norwegian Institute for Air Research). It is based on a combination of threshold tests, depending on the time of day and channel availability. For pixels where volcanic ash is detected, a volcanic ash retrieval algorithm is applied. This algorithm is based on the work of Fred Prata (Norwegian Institute for Air Research) under a EUMETSAT study contract. An outline of the VOL algorithm is provided here. For complete specifications and calculations, see the VOL Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD). The document reference number is listed in Section 5. 4.1 Processing mask The ash detection algorithm is applied to all SEVIRI pixels in the processing area. The ash retrieval algorithm is only applied to pixels in which ash was detected. 4.2 Ash detection After reading in the image data, the related auxiliary data (latitude, longitude, solar zenith and static datasets), the processing performs the following steps for each pixel: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Check the solar zenith angle for day (sol_zen < 80 ), night (sol_zen > 90 ) or twilight (between 80 and 90 ), to select the thresholds and tests. Calculate the following test flags: Test1A = (T8.7 - T10.8) > a 1A + b 1A T PCS,8.7 + c 1A T PCS,10.8 Test2A = (T12.0 - T10.8) > a 2A + b 2A T PCS,12.0 + c 2A T PCS,10.8 Test3A = (T3.9-T10.8) > a 3A + b 3A T PCS,3.9 + c 3A T PCS,10.8 Test3B = (T3.9-T10.8) < a 3B + b 3B T PCS,3.9 + c 3B T PCS,10.8 Test4A = (Refl3.9 / Refl0.6) > a 4A with (T PCS,chan ) denoting the predicted clear sky brightness temperature in channel chan derived from the ECMWF forecast with the radiative transfer model.. Apply the following tests. Test Condition Test Logic Result Night or Twilight (sol_zen > = 80) Test 1A and Test2A and Test3A and Test3B Ash Day (sol_zen < 80) Test1A and Test2A and Test4A Ash Step 4 If the result of the tests is Ash and (T12.0 T10.8) > 0.5, the pixel is considered to be potentially ash-contaminated. Page 7 of 9

4.3 Ash retrieval The ash retrieval algorithm is applied to the pixels which were classified as potentially ash contaminated by the ash detection algorithm above. The inputs to the ash retrieval algorithm are as follows: The satellite zenith angle, sat_zen. The measured brightness temperature in channels IR10.8 and IR12.0: T10.8 and T12.0. An estimate of the surface skin temperature, Ts = T PCS,12.0, taken as the predicted clear sky brightness temperature in channel IR12.0. An estimate of the ash cloud top temperature, Tc, obtained from the minimum measured brightness temperature in channel IR12.0 of potentially ash contaminated pixels within the vicinity of the current pixel. After accepting these inputs into the processing cycle, the algorithm performs the following steps. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Determine the minimum value of T12.0 for potentially ash contaminated pixels within each block. From the satellite zenith angle and T10.8 compute a water vapour correction term. Look up the ash cloud optical depth, aod, and effective particle radius, radius in two look-up tables. Step 4 Determine the total ash mass loading, M, expressed in kg /m -2. Step 5 Derive the ash cloud top height in kilometers. Page 8 of 9

5 REFERENCES AND PRODUCT ASSISTANCE Type Document Name Reference Algorithm Specification Volcanic Ash Detection: ATBD EUM/MET/REP/07/0467 Survey Validation test Volcanic Information Derived from Satellite Data MSG-3 System Commissioning Product Validation Test Report F. Prata, February 2011, NILU (Norwegian Institute for Air Research) EUM/MSG/REP/12/0190 Online Resources and Assistance All of the reference documents listed above are in the EUMETSAT Technical Documents page. www.eumetsat.int > Satellites > Technical Documents > Meteosat Services > 0 Meteosat Meteorological Products A training presentation for the VOL Product is here: http://www.eumetsat.int > home > Data > Training > TrainingLibrary > index > Monitoring of Volcanic Eruptions with MSG RGB Products > Introduction to Remote Sensing Techniques for Ash and SO2 Detection > Volcanic Ash Training Module To register for data delivery from this product, go to the Data Registration page on the EUMETSAT web page: www.eumetsat.int > Data > Data Delivery > Data Registration Information about the service status of EUMETSAT satellites and the data they deliver is this EUMETSAT web page: www.eumetsat.int > Data > Service Status To get answers to any questions about data delivery, registration or documentation, contact the EUMETSAT User Service Help Desk: Telephone: +49 6151 807 3660/3770 e-mail: ops@eumetsat.int Page 9 of 9