1
3 11162010 7 9 25 11633 ()() VANGOGHMUSEUM : 12647 ROTTERDAM DELFT 13669 SILODAMMVRDV 1900 14695 : 156107 EUWEERK 16113 121 O 141
5
6
2004/05 Amsterdam 2009/10 - - / Amsterdam - / Amsterdam Roeterseiland Univercity Luca Bertolini «Planning concepts for cities in transition: Regionalization of urbanity in the Amdsterdam metropolitan area» Eric van der Kooij Metropolitan Team / Spatial Planning Department of the City of Amsterdam Zuiderkerk Amsterdam projects 7
8
: 13 1 Eiselmeer polder 9 13 1377 1421 1550 1665 1717 1774 1826 - polder Eiselmeer Friesland 1930 Eiselmeer ( ) (DKindersley Amsterdam 2006 explorer ) - - 1634 1637 - polder dam - 1 9
1936 10
1966 (Britanica World Atlas 1966) 3 4 niederdeutsch ( ) (Holland = ) 10 11 1548 11
(damm) Nederland ( Niederländer) Holland Nederland (iederlande Holland) Netherland Holland ( dutchmann) holland Dutch deutsche Deutschland ( ) Thodisc 2 Thiudisc Diutisc deutsch ( «Germania» Allemagne - alle Mane ) 1 ( ) 3 4 Friesland 13 14 13 14 1548 17 1566 Lübek «()» (Hansa ) ( ) 1697 2 Oxford Dictionary *theud deot ish ( ) ( Thiuda-reiks + ;;;) 4-6 12
(11 ) (15 ) (Colin McEvedy The Penguin Atlas of Medieval History Maryland 1964) 1566 1609 «17» 3 ( ) (1602) (1621) 16 17 (Colin McEvedy The Penguin ) 3 3 752 13
1492 ( ) 17 17 18 4 ( 417) «( 19 )» ( 418 426 ) ( ) ( 341) ( ) 346 «ÿ» ( 16 ( ) 5 6 ( ) () ( ) 13-14 4 3 20 36 5 418 6 416 14
16 1609 «1619» 7 «17 (19 )» 8 ( ) ( ) ( 1814-15) 1815 1830 1815 ( ) 19 (Colin McEvedy The Penguin Atlas of Modern History Middlessex 1972) 1824 1830 1880 20% 7 752 8 15
( ) 20 ( farmers) ( ) 1840 1870 \ 1903 1870 1400 3340 ( ) British Shell Company ( ) Royal Dutch Shell Philips 20 (Colin McEvedy The Penguin Atlas of Recent History New York 1982) 16
1918 (11-18 1918) Unilever (1927) (1929) 200000 ( 15000 1944-45 2500 ) 1945 1947 (1946) (1949) (1957) (1951) (Belge-Nederland- Louxenbourg) (1948-1954) (1957) : 1970 5% 50% Unilever Philips Royal Dutch Shell 1969: eenheid van alle linkse krachten ( 1969) 17
Randstad (= + ) Randstad ( ) ( ) Randstadt 1850 1980 Peter Hall The World Cities London 1967) 18
Randstad 1960 (Peter Hall ) Ijsselmeer ( Ijsel Yssel Ijselmunde «Ijsel» Zuiderzee ( ) Zuidersee 1932 (Michelin Carte de Europe 1:200000 Nord Holland 1961) 19
( ) 1200 (DKindersley ) van Amstel van von = de «()» van Amstel 1300 1100 1600 (DKindersley ) 1385 1566-1609 1500 15000 1600 1663 1648 20
- (Merian «Europa» 17 ) 1700 1950 (DKindersley ) - 7 ÿ (DKindersley ) 21
: - (1969) ( 1969) 4-6 - ( ) (DKindersley ) 22
Bloemgracht gracht Graben - straat Strasse (bloem Blumen ) (DKindersley ) - (DKindersley ) 23
( 1969) 1960 Randstadt (Michelin ) 24
11-1020 ( ;) 2712 1255 300-500! (!) Shiphol ( (El Venezuelos Kemal Ataturk Ben Gourion Charle de Gaul John Kennedy Nikos Kazantzakis Megas Alexandros Tolis Voskopoulos) 6 ( )! ( - ) Coffee shops chorto shops «zoniana Adialoghs» ;- sex shop (Mari Juana) LSD : ( ) (Tin-Tin au pays de lÿor noir) hand made home made 70!!-! bock () malz () 10 ( «van Gogh» ÿ ) ( van Gogh ) : ICOMOS! 12 ( Jugendherberger Bunnik -2171962- :!!) ( Ubbergen Nijmegen -1881962-25
)! (!) Haarlem Leuden Delft ( ) 200 ( - ) ( ) Delft ( ) ÿ50-5-6 «DAT GEBEURT TOCH NIE IN MIJN OMGEVING ( ( ;) Lijnbaan ÿ50 Bakema ( ) Breuer 1969 Beuerstraverse - ( ) Binnenrotte ( ; ) (Kijk kubus)!!! (!) - ( - ÿ ) ( 26
) «tofu» (;)!! ( ) SMS : ( 50)! Zadkine ( Dutch Shell Company ;;;) Zadkine ( ) 19 ( ) Nieuwe Maas Boompjes Erasmusburg Blaak metro Rotterdam Blaak (;) (;) ( ) «;» ( koningin Emma Plein ) Westelijk Handels Terrein 20 K 50 40-50! ( 12 ) ( ) Vreewijk ( 20 )! ( ) 17 ( ) - «uzeri restaurant de kleine griek» ( «ouzo - meze»)!! ( ;) (!) 9 2200 15 38 525 27
13 housing Dirk Hartogh straat Oude Hout Haven containers ( ) (!) ( ) ( ) Enge apel steeg ( )! (5-6 )!! Waterloo 1942 Zuid WTS Minervalaan Plan Zuid Zuideramstelkanal Berlage 1920-3-4 Berlage 1600! Bijlmermeer Bijlmer/ArenA Bijlmermeer ÿ60 - -Josi-Wood Toulouse-le-Mirail ( ) De Dageraad De Klerk Superblock 28
( ) ( WC WC 19 reserv VIPs) ; 14 Greuzenveld 55 Osdorp -! Bijlmermeer ÿ60 ( ) WOZOGO «50»!!! ; ( ) : ; -! Ijlburg-Haven Eiland ( ;- )! ( ;) ( ; ) Zeeburg-Borneo Borneo ÿ ;!! - - ( ) ( ) 29
- ( ÿ ) Nemo (ÿ ) ; TV DSM ( ) ÿ NDSM ( provos ÿ60) 16 - - ( ) ( ( Studebacker Pondiac Cadilac ÿ50 ) ( ) 15 O ( ) euwe erk 1969!! bar saloon!! ( ) «ÿ ;») : Dam Kalverstraat Magna Plaza 18 1992 ( 30
)! Mall Mall (-) ( ) () extra super (!) Dam ( ) Volden Park ) ÿ 19-20 ( ) Dam 2000 (;) ( )! 16 de Pijp (-) - 19 de Pijp ( ) 17 19 ( ) (;) Frans Erens 1892 9! Olympic Air Olympic Airways ( ;) 31
(;) 2104 1830 ÿ - (!) 830 735 ( 70 Bijlmermeer ) 5-6 ( ÿ ) ( ) 32
33
: () () (Red Light Districts) RLD ( ) : ) ) ) 2000 - - - (Gording 2001) 35
/- 30% 20000 3000 11000 - - 1960 1970 Belle : "Respect sex workers all over the world" 2007 Oudekerksplein RLD De Wallen RLD De Wallen 6500 300 sex-shops sextheatres 36
De Wallen 15 : (1413 ) - - Stoofsteeg De Wallen 37
De Wallen Trompettersteeg : 1 2010 2 - (Boys) - ; ; 38
3 ; / - - : : - : - - - - - - ( ) (Derrida) - ; - - (Green 1990) - O : Elisabeth Wilson : 39
: (Wilson 1991) : : ; ; Aalbers M Big Sister is Watching You! Gender Interaction and the Unwritten Rules of the Amsterdam Red Light District Barber A From the Red Light District to the Red Carpet: The Gentrification of Amsterdam's Red Light District and its Impact on the Decocratic Citizenship Rights of Sex Workers Boys J 1984 Is there a Feminist Analysis of Architecture? The Built Environment 101 Green E 1990 Green E et al Womenÿs Leisure What Leisure? Macmillan London 6 : Gershenson Ol Penner B Introduction: The private Life of Public Conceniences Wilson El 1991 The Sphinx in the city Virago Press London 1994 59-67 2003 http://s638photobucketcom/home/bard07 http://enwikipediaorg/wiki/prostitution_in_the_netherlands 40
VAN GOGH MUSEUM Van Gogh Museumplein ( Amsterdam) Rijksmuseum Stedelijk Museum : Gerrit Rietveld 1963-1964 1973 Exhibition Wing Kisho Kurokawa 1999 Rietveld 1964 J Wheatfield 1888 Vincent van Gogh van Dillen J van Tricht 1998-99 Greiner Van Goor Huijten Architects BV Paulus Potterstraat Van Gogh Rietveld De Stijl 1998-99 Greiner Van Goor Huijten Architects BV Exhibition Wing Kisho Kurokawa Georges Berne Eveline Merkx of Merkx+Girod Architects Paulus Potterstraat : Exhibition Wing Kisho Kurokawa http://wwwvangoghmuseumnl/ Museumplein Concertgebouw Rijksmuseum 1996-1999 Museumplein 41
Sven-Ingvar Andersson Museumplein : http://wwwchannelsnl/museumpleinhtml http://wwwvangoghmuseumnl/ http://wwwchannelsnl/museumpleinhtml 42
: - 12 17 - ÿ 21 - - - - 17 18 - - - - - - Singel Heren-gracht Keizersgracht Prinsengracht Singelgracht - Heren-gracht - 17 Prinsengracht - - (Centraal Sta-tion) - ; : - - Damrak Amstelredam Amsterdam café coffee shops - - café - 43
Oude Kerk Damrak Dam - 30-17 - Madame Tussaud 15 Neuwe Kerk - ÿ - Dam 263 Prinsengracht 1635 1942 1944 Jordaan 17 brown cafes stylish boutiques Jordan artistic Singelgracht Mu-seumplein Royal Concert Hall - Van Gogh - Rijksmuseum - Rembrant Vermeer Stedelijk Museumplein Vondelpark ÿ - Hortus Botanicus Artis - - 1838- - - - Waterlooplein - extra bonus street market window shopping ÿ Dam Kalverstraat Nieuwendijk - - 15-20 3 - - - - 44
400 - - ÿ - - - - - - to go Iguazu (Prinsengracht 703) T-bone steaks sauce - Parana (Geldersekade 5) 25 Top Thai (Herenstraat 22) - sauce Papaya Pok Pok - 25-30 - Eat Mode (Zeedijk 105) 15-20 - Semhar ÿ - - 13 coffee shops - bar club 100 coffee shops Leidseplein bar club dance clubs Zebra Jimmy Woo Sugar Factory clubbing lounge bar The Mansion Suzi Wong Rembrandtplein Amstel Ice Bar - lounge bar Xtra Cold massive club Escape Live rock jazz blues funk - The Waterhole (Korte Leidse-dwars-str 49) jazz Alto (Korte Leidsedwars-str 115) Bourbon Street (Leidse-kruis-straat 6) : http://wwweuro2daygr/inlife/escape/articles/119968/ http://wwwnukedgr/modulesphp 45
47
ROTTERDAM ROTTERDAM CENTRAL STATION PROJECT 2004-2012 Rotterdam 2004 Team CS ( Benthem Crouwel Architekten Meyer en Van Schooten Architecten West 8) Rotterdam Central Station High Speed Line (HSL) De Provenierswijk 19 Weena Boulevard ÿ Westersingel Rotterdam 1-5: Rotterdam Central Station :http://wwwwest8nl/projects/all/ro tterdam_centraal_station/ 49
6-8: Central Station Nationale Nederlande/ : 9: 1910 1970 50
Schouwburgplein West 8 (Adriaan Geuze Edzo Bindels Martin Biewenga Jerry van Eyck) 1991-1996 10-18: Schouwburgplein / : Rotterdam City Theatre City Concert Hall ÿÿ 35cm 1980 Schouwburgplein 15 10-18: Schouwburgplein 51
- - - - 10-18: Schouwburgplein LIJNBAAN JH VAN DEN BROEK JB BAKEMA 1953 19-22: Lijnbaan Lijnbaan Van Den Broek Bakema 1953 ÿ 52
19-22: Lijnbaan Beurstraverseÿ de Architekten Cie 1993-1996 Beurstraverseÿ Hoogstraat Lijnbaan Coolsingel 23-24: Beurstraverse / : 25: / : http://www1cienl/projects/projects---partners/pi-de-bruijn/beurstraverse-rotterdamaspx Binnenrotte Binnenrotte ÿ 53
project MVRDV 26-30: Binnenrotte / : Kubuswoningen / Cube Houses P Blom 1978-1984 54
31-34: Kubuswoningen Blaak Binnenrotte Kubuswoning Piet Blom 1978-1984 - 38 - (Kijkkubus) 55
35-37: / : Nieuwe Maas Erasmusburg Kop van Zuid 38: Nieuwe Maas : http://uploadwikimediaorg/wikipedia/commons/6/68/nieuwe_maas_osmpng?uselang=de 39-40: Erasmusburg Maas Rotterdam : Rotterdam Rotterdam 56
( ) ( ) Erasmusbridge (Van Berkel & Bos 1990-1996) - Maas Kop van Zuid Katebdrecht Afrikaanderbuut Feijenoord Wilhelminaplein Entrepot Landtong Wilhemina Pier Zuidkade Stadstuinen Parkstad Wilhemina Pier Erasmusbridge v Varkennoordse Wilhelminaplein Tramplus : Kop van Zuid ( 1993-2010) Wilhelmina Pier Kop van Zuid Erasmus Bridge Kop van Zuid 41-43: Kop Van Zuid 57
Rotterdam museumpark 80 - (NAi) Rotterdam Kunsthal KUNSTHAL Rem Koolhaas 1992 44-45: To Kunsthal Rotterdam Kunsthal Rem Koolhaas 20-25 4-5 ÿÿ 60x60m Museum Park Maasboulevard Museum Park Maasboulevard 46: / : (2006) Koolhaas- 58
Koolhaas ( ) 47-48: To Kunsthal MUSEUM PARK Museum Park Rotterdam 80 Boymans-van Beuningen Kunsthal Museum Park Rotterdam 49: Museum Park / : : 2010 50: Museum Park 51: Museum Park (440m x 130m) 60 ( Jean Prouvé) Boymans-van Beuningen 6m : Kunsthal 59
52-53: i / : http://ennainl/ NAi Jo Coenen 54-55: Boymans-van Beuningen / : http://wwwboijmansnl/nl/ Boymans-van Beuningen 1934 Van Der Steur 56: Museum Park 57: Erasmusburg Rotterdam 60
20 Capsular architecture ( ) The Capsular Civilization Lieven De Cauter Rotterdam : 52000 ÿ De Cauter L 2005 The Capsular Civilization Rotterdam: NAi Publishers 1994 : 2005 : Xochimilko ( ) : Kop Van Zuid 2009 Rotterdam: ÿ 2006 Koolhaas- http://guiding-architectsnet/ http://homeplanetnl/~stee8329/planning/kopvanzuidhtml http://wwwbenthemcrouwelnl http://forumskyscraperpagecom wwwyouropicom wwwwdwnl http://wwwrotterdamnl http://wwwurbansquarescom/holland01html http://www1cienl/projects/projects---partners/pi-de-bruijn/beurstraverse-rotterdamaspx 61
DELFT D Johannes Vermeer 1600 Delft o Delft H Delft 13 12 polder 1100 Delft (1) «delve» - 2 Nieuwe Delft (2) ( ) Oude Delft ( ) Oude Nieuwe Delft 1246-62 Historical maps of Blaeu 1652 : Wikipedia
(canal) - - (gracht) (singels) Delft -!! - Delft parking - - ( ) ( ) Parking «uzeri restaurant de kleine griek» - «ouzo - meze» 63!!
Delft : Markt Markt (euwe Kerk) 1536 Markt 17 - Delft - Hendrick de Keyser 64
1536 Pieter de Keyser T : 1886 ( ) 1396 100 1584 William the Silent Hendrick Pieter de Keysero (Guilds) - - restaurant 65
Markt 17 : Wikipedia : - Delft - 9 10!! 66
: Anne Benthues Uwe Ahrens Winfried Maas 2006 100 66-67 Robert DHuerta 2003 Giants of Delft: Johannes Vermeer and the natural philosophers Associated University Press England wwwwikipediacom wwwtudelftnl 67
68
SILODAM MVRDV (!!!) (!) (!!) Oude Hout Haven Oude Hout Haven Zoutkeetsplein ( ;;;) 70
Zoutkeetsplein!! Oude Hout Haven! : Oude Hout Haven 1 : containers 2 : Silodam MVRDV ( ) CONTAINERS MVRDV: wwwe-architectcouk/amsterdam 1000 MVRDV 12 containers 9 ( 3 ) 71
Ij ( ; «! ;;!» ;;!) MVRDV SILODAM Silodam Ij (silos) 157 600 4 8 / Ij 80 157 Silo 10 20 ( - 72
) "" 2002 / 26000 m2 MVRDV Bouwbedrijf "MJ de Nijs en Zn Cauberg-Huygen Pieters Bouwtechniek Rabo Vastgoed De Principaal BV Silodam MVRDV: wwwe-architectcouk/amsterdam ( ;;; ) Silodam 73
Silodam MVRDV : wwwe-architectcouk/amsterdam Silodam: Silodam "" (!) Silodam MVRDV : wwwearchitectcouk/amsterdam 74
Silodam ' MVRDV Silodam 75
E Silodam :wwwe-architectcouk/amsterdam Silodam : ( ) 76
( ;;;)!! : ( ;;; -!!!!!) ( Amsterdam Holland!!!) 77
Zuid WTS (!!!) Waterloo (!!) cafe : 78
1900 "" "" 20 "" 20 : 1920-1940: "Plan Zuid" Hendrik Petrus Berlage 1920-1923: "De Dageraad" Michel de Klerk PL Kramer 1940-1960: "Westelijke Tuinsteden" (Western Garden Suburbs / ) 1960-1970: "Bijlmermeer" polders o polders 65% 10000 polder polders 1500 polder polder 20 18 19 80
laissez-faire ÿ 19 (City Council) 1875 ( ) ( " ") " " 1901 20 20 (lease-hold system) 20 (Municipal Real Estate Department) (Hellenic Public Real Estate Corporation) 1896 (lease-hold system) : 75% (15000 ) 6500 Waterland 1900 " " ( ) 81
' 1901 1914 FM Wihoeut 14 1910 1920 10000 ( ) Hendrik Petrus Berlage (Amsterdam School) Michel de Klerk Johan van der Mey PL Kramer 1920-1940: "Plan Zuid" Hendrik Petrus Berlage 1917 Plan Zuid H P Berlage Plan Zuid 20 1917 Plan Zuid Plan Zuid : Plan Zuid 82
"Plan Zuid" H P Berlage (1) Zuid (2) Minervalaan (3) De Dageraad Zuid Minervalaan ( ) Zuid 83
Minervalaan 1920-1923: "De Dageraad" Michel de Klerk PL Kramer 1919 1923 Plan Zuid PL Takbuurt 12 1600 (De Dageraad Onze Woning Rochdale Patrimonium Dr Schaepman Amsterdam Zuid) (Michel de Klerk PL Kramer JH Rinja AW Weissman Tj Kuipers A Ingwersen Gulden Geldmaker) : 84
1920 De Dageraad De Klerk Kramer 294 ( ) "ladder windows" Takbuurt 6 De Dageraad De Dageraad de Klerk : " " de Klerk " " Le Corbusier 85
1940-1960: "Westelijke Tuinsteden" (Western Garden Suburbs / ) " " (General Extension Plan) 1935 Cornelius van Eesteren 1949 ÿ 100000 86
General Extension Plan 1935 ( ) CIAM 1933 Plan Zuid blocks blocks 5 Sloterplas ( ) (green belts) 400 Slotermeer Geuzenveld Slotervaart Osdorp 87
parking 88
1960-1970: "Bijlmermeer" Bijlmermeer 1961 100000 Bijlmermeer Gaasperdam Bijlmermeer Gaasperdam Bijlmermeer : 800 Bijlmermeer block 30 180 60 2500 89
master plan Bijlmermeer Bijlmermeer ( ) pilotis ( ) ÿ ( ) ÿ70 "" pilotis pilotis "" "" 90
Bijlmermeer 2010 1992 2010 91
"" : 1 "Plan Zuid" Hendrik Petrus Berlage 2 "De Dageraad" Michel de Klerk PL Kramer 3 "Westelijke Tuinsteden" (Western Garden Suburbs / ) 4 "Bijlmermeer" 92
"" 16 project Borneo Sporenburg Borneo Sporenburg Bureau Voorlichting gemeente Amsterdam 1975 Amsterdam Wonen publication of the Bureau Voorlichting gemeente Amsterdam Amsterdam Casciato M 2003 The Amsterdam School 010 Publishers Rotterdam Fainstein Susan 2000 "The egalitarian city: images of Amsterdam" Understanding Amsterdam Essays on economic vitality city life and urban form Aksant Academic Publishers Amsterdam 93-115 Hommels A 2005 "The spatial renewal of the Bijlmermeer" Unbuilding cities Obduracy in urban socio-technical change The MIT Press Massachusetts Municipal Physical Planning Department 1983 Amsterdam Planning and Development publication of the Physical Planning Department Amsterdam 2003 " Westelijke Tuinsteden ( ) " 2 2 32-45 2003 93
94
: Phython Bridge Borneo Sporenburg Cadillac 50 NDSM 26 Ijburg Ijburg Ijburg Ijmeer 1965 Van Den Broek Jacob Berend Bakema PampusPlan (1996) 1997 Steigereiland ( Jetty Island) 200 Haveneiland ( Harbour Island) Rieteilanden ( Reed Islands) : Centrumeiland ( Centre Island) Middeneiland ( Middle Island) Strandeiland (Beach Island) Buiteneiland (Outer Island) masterplan 1995 45000 : 2002 Rieteilanden Haveneiland Steigereiland (: ) 96
(: ) 30% 40% 30% ( : : ) 12000 Ijburg Grimshaw Piet-Hein-Tunnel Ijburglaan (Ijburg Avenue) (Enneus Heerma Bridge Nesciobrug) ( ) Ijburg Dura Vermeer Johan van der Pol The Truman Show Seaside Krier Duany Plater-Zyberk «-» 97
Ijburg (Walter Benjamin1935) 2004 _ : Borneo Sporenburg Borneo Sporenburg 1989 8000 1996 West 8 2500 VINEX project Borneo-Sporenburg 30 (Van Herk & De Kleijn MH3 Neutelings Riedijk Architects ) (100 ) A Geuze West 8 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 30% ) west 8 Python Bridge 93 98
Python Bridge (: ) ( The Whale IJTower Fountainhead) Whale () 150 64 1100 179 Frits van Dongen 1998-2000 Sporenburg Ijburg Borneo Sporenburg 99
ÿ (: : ) (: ) (: ) 100
«( ) (» (: : ) NDSM Nemo Nemo Renzo Piano 1997 Nemo (: ) «off» (broedplaatsen) 101
2000 «Geen cultuur zonder subcultuur Plan van Aanpak Broedplaats» (squatters) 1970 1980 1978 NDSM Werf 1984 85000 site specific skateboard hip-hop 102
NDSM (: ) 19 () NDSM (Dutch Docking and Shipbuilding Company) ÿ 80 (1984) 1999 Kinetisch Noord ( ) «Geen cultuur zonder subcultuur Plan van Aanpak Broedplaats» Kinetisch Noord 'Stad als Casco' ( ) NDSM Stad als cascoÿ NDSM 103
« ( )» ( : : ) : (gentrification) 2007 : 5 TICCIH 2010 Ijburg: 2010 : 04/07/2010 wwwavgigr 104
105 2010 Amsterdam 2006 wwwcabeorguk http://wwwndsmnl wwwthelearningnetworknet http://wwwarchnewsnowcom wwwwest8nl
106
EUWE ERK Luca Bertolini Van Amsterdam - euwe erk euwe erk 15 17 10 Albert Jaanszoon Vinckenbring 1645 1664 9 1969 bar saloon euwe erk : 30 17 ( - 1 - ) polders polders 9 Vinckenbring St Luke 108
(watermanagement) «waterlevels» - polders ( ) 50 : 30 2040 4: IJ 109
2010-2040 : 2040 7: ( ) 2028 - - project - IJ ( )- 110
2010-2040 : : : 111
112
"" (Gemeentevervoerbedrijf/GVB) 1000000 (ferries) GVB ( ) (NS) 1 1900 Amsterdam Omnibus Company Gemeentetram Amsterdam (GTA) " " 1943 Gemeentevervoerbedrijf (GVB) " " 2002 GVB : (: wwwgvbnl) 1897-1 1900-1 Gemeentetram Amsterdam (GTA) " " 14 1908-1916 - 1941-25 1943 - Gemeentevervoerbedrijf (GVB) " " 1950 - GVB 1000 1966-1969 - GVB 1970 - GVB 1977 - Weesperplein-Gaasperplas 1990 - light-rail Amstelveen 1994 - Stadsmobiel 1997-50 (Ring Line) Isolatorweg Gein 2000 - GVB 2001-155 Combino 2002 - GVB 2003-2004 - 51 Westwijk 2005-26 GVB : 3 812 1 (light rail) ( Route 51 Amstelveen) 114
16 805 49 12 4 24 1 2017 (Central Station) (1 2 5 13 17) (4 9 16 24 25 26) (3 7 10 12 14) 4 (51 53 54) 50 o - Zuidas - Muiderpoort Lelylaan 10 Ijburg Almere - 550000 220000 400 38% 115
(: wwwgvbnl) 116
: 1 5 (5) (1) : 16 : 5 : 25 : : 117
Zuidas - Zuidas (: wwwzuidasnl) 118
120 O156
Planning Theory & Practice Vol 4 No 2 131146 June 2003 Planning Concepts for Cities in Transition: Regionalization of Urbanity in the Amsterdam Structure Plan LUCA BERTOLINI & WILLEM SALET ABSTRACT Opting for urbanityÿ is the main thread running through the Amsterdam structure plan currently under preparation But what is urbanityÿ? How is it emerging in a multi-centred region? What spatial planning implications does it entail? These questions were at the outset of a research study commissioned by the municipality of Amsterdam to the Amsterdam study centre for the Metropolitan Environment (AME) and summarized in this article There are two main conclusions The first is that traditional inside out development strategiesaccommodating the expansion of a single core and its peripherymust be substituted by outside in development strategies seeking to achieve a new synergy among different sub-centres and places at the urban-regional level The second is that new sub-centres will have to be developed as real centres of urbanity instead of as mono-functional islands as currently still the case In order to implement these strategies the municipality needs to enter coalitions with a variety of public and private actors spanning different spatial scales and policy sectors Introduction: The Multidimensional City Amsterdam is currently making preparations for the cityÿs new structure plan An outline strategy has been put forward for discussion and a host of people in and outside the Planning Department are working towards the final version of this strategic spatial document The main thread running through the new structure plan is contained in the slogan opting for urbanityÿ The municipality sees the urbanity of the city as the most important quality it has to offer in the broader regional field but also in the national and international context and it wants to reinforce this distinctive quality with spatial policies (see also Gadet & Van de Ven 2000) AME was asked by the Planning Department to discuss this choice in more detail 1 There are two important issues connected with this task and both have implications beyond the particular case of Amsterdam The first is the need to define urbanity a complex and multidimensional concept in such a way that it can be related to specific spatial planning choices The second and quite crucial issue stems from the observation that the Amsterdam area is undergoing a transition from an agglomeration strongly oriented towards one core towards an urban regional network of multiple centres and shifting hierarchies Many metropolitan regions in Europe cope with similar challenges of urban transformation This article will first elaborate on the definition of urbanity free from any association with specific urban forms and places (eg the historic inner city) Luca Bertolini AME Amsterdam Study Centre for the Metropolitan Environment Universiteit van Amsterdam Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130 1018 VZ Amsterdam the Netherlands Email: lbertolini@frwuvanl 1464-9357 Print/1470-000X On-line/03/020131-16 2003 Taylor & Francis Ltd DOI: 101080/1464935032000099780
132 L Bertolini & W Salet Figure 1 Amsterdam the municipality with the most important locations named in the article Second it will explore spatial opportunities and threats for the development of urbanity across the urban regional field As a preamble this section needs to specify better the nature of the current transition from agglomeration to network and its implications for spatial planning One of the most delicate aspects regarding the general principles of strategic spatial planning policy for Amsterdam is the question of scale and differentiating the public and private spheres of influence at different levels All previous structure plans from the 1930s on had essentially been concerned with the expansion of the central city Anyone looking ahead for the next 30 years however sees not a driving central urban economy creating new opportunities in a circle around it but a metropolitan region with a variety of centres made up of new locations along through-roads and around public transportation nodes related in only a few respects to the central cityÿs former regional function (see Figures 1 and 2) Without a focal point the old centrifugal forces cease to be dominant The important question for the future of the city then is how its scattered areas of urbanity can remain connected within the networks of urban interaction the focus of which is partly outside the traditional municipal boundaries This gives rise to a new situation where Amsterdam will have to exchange its traditional inside-outÿ policy (planning its expansion) for an outside-inÿ approach where the focus shifts to positioning itself in the networks of multiple centres in a broader spatial field The transition is not just a geographical one Virtually all strategic planning issues are under discussion at a higher level than that of the area within the municipal boundaries and the relevant policy making and lobbying organizations concerned with such strategic issues operate on a wide variety of scales The city already plays an important
Planning Concepts for Cities in Transition 133 Figure 2 Amsterdam the emerging regional metropolis with main infrastructure and subcentres role in many of these supra-local policy processes The Municipality is for instance involved in a variety of bilateral policy agreements with neighbouring municipalities in the urban district in a number of policy coalitions in the North Wing of the Randstad (the northern part of the western conurbation of the Netherlands including Amsterdam Utrecht Rotterdam and The Hague see Figure 3) and in co-ordinating its policy with provincial policy Furthermore it was one of the instigators of the Delta Metropolis initiative (trying to develop the Randstad as one whole); and it has good access to national government policy making in The Hague and to a lesser extent in Europe The Municipality also has a multiplicity of relationships with non-governmental bodies such as Schiphol airport Some of these are lasting coalitions some are more ad hoc but one thing is certain: these coalitions are not necessarily on the same wavelengths On the contrary there appears to be a latent degree of competition between them as they frequently get to different conclusions about what should be done These bi- and multilateral interactions overlap with a formal administrative structure where municipalities still have a strong autonomy there is no metropolitan government the province lacks strong means to enforce regional co-ordination and national spatial planning policies increasingly get the character of broad guidelines In principle the structure plan can play an important role in helping to lay down priorities for municipal policy in this multidimensional policy context A central choice made in this plan has been the focus on urbanityÿ as the specific quality that Amsterdam can contribute to the emerging multi-centred regional metropolis However urbanity is
134 L Bertolini & W Salet Figure 3 The Randstad or Delta Metropolis with main cities (black) and their agglomeration (dark grey) a complex concept There is a need to define it in a way that enables identifying relationships with specific spatial planning choices At the same time the transition to a multi-centred regional metropolis evoked above requires that the whole of the regional field be scannedÿ for spatial opportunities and threats for urbanity In the following an attempt will be made to define the concept of urbanityÿ as well as to discuss the implications of the slogan opting for urbanityÿ for spatial planning policies in Amsterdam and the region Conditions for Urbanity The concept of urbanityÿ is often associated with diversity a multiplicity of extremes in lifestyles with cultural innovations with conflict and dynamism and much less with uniformity averages harmony or stability The notion of movement and resulting renewal seems indeed elementary to any concept of urbanity but it does not seem likely that urban areas can retain their appeal in the long run solely by virtue of their variation and changeability Urbanity thus includes both characteristics albeit the rhythm of harmony and dynamism beats faster in a typical urban environment than a rural one This section will try to indicate the conditions for and dimensions of urbanity from the spatial planning point of view Two general conditions would seem to be of substantial importance (see among others Jacobs 1969; Lynch 1980; Salet 1996): (1) Urbanity presupposes vitality and learning potential Can patterns of spatial activity and the relationships between them respond appropriately to new circumstances which are constantly producing fresh challenges? (2) Urbanity presupposes broad physical and institutional access to the relevant urban
Planning Concepts for Cities in Transition 135 qualities not just the physical accessibility of these central places but also in its institutional meaning regarding the ways the public spaces may or not may be used As far as both of these conditions are concerned far-reaching changes are taking place in Amsterdam requiring unconventional answers The first condition points to the spatial implications of structural changes in the economic context and the socio-demographic composition of the urban population Changes in the economy resulted initially in a reduction in industrial activity in the city; the ensuing sharp growth in the service sector resulted then in expansion on such a scale that the finely tuned grid of the old central city could no longer accommodate this growth At first the municipality still tried to find a place for it in the historic city centre The impasse reached at the beginning of the 1990s in the plans for the Netherlandsÿ biggest urban development on the banks of the river Ij (with offices retail and other large-scale urban activities around Central Station CS in Figure 1) marks the symbolic failure of this effort But it also underlines the transition from a mono-centric inner-city structure to a polycentric geographical and economic structure in which the old city centre is reserved for the development of tourism and cultural industries and the periphery for massive offices and large-scale amenities However consolidating this emerging pattern through the structure plan still entails given the continuous dynamism of the economic context many challenges as we shall see As regards the most important structural changes in the socio-demographic context the last 20 years have seen an enormous inflow of foreign immigrants matched by a just as dramatic exodus of middle-class families radically changing the cityÿs socio-demographic composition and making it increasingly selective Here again the question is whether the urban laboratoryÿ given these socio-demographic changes is displaying sufficient elasticityÿ (in the words of Kevin Lynch); that is does it provide adequate accommodation to both newcomers and residents with continuously shifting needs As far as the second condition of urbanity is concerned the need for physical and institutional access to typical places of urbanity there are also important questions Accessibility has several meanings In the first sense of physical accessibility it has to do with the quality of the transport systems within the municipality but also and perhaps most importantly at the scale of the daily urban system (the urban region) Amsterdam is quite successful in this respect (see for example Bertolini & Le Clercq forthcoming) However as will be seen in some detail it still lacks a high-performance public transport system at the urban regional scale Furthermore not all urban interaction is channelled through long-range transport networks For many urban activities physical proximity (or accessibility by slow modes) still has a crucial role Accordingly a sufficient degree of finely grained functional and socio-economic mix throughout the urban fabric is desirable Next to this physical meaning accessibility has also an institutional meaning regarding the degree that space can or cannot be used Is the use of space open for everyone and every goal or is access constrained or monopolized in some way? There are many constraints on the public use of space that can be illustrated by the Amsterdam case The extreme scarcity of private homes in the capital due mainly to the equally extreme proportion of subsidized rented housing (which still accounts for more than 80 per cent of the total number of dwellings) combined with the cityÿs cultural attractiveness has for instance made living in Amsterdam practically impossible for both first-time buyers and newcomers not only in the favoured (highly exclusive) city centre but throughout the city For most people the lengthy waiting list for subsidized rented homes (where