US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG



Similar documents
USACE Dam Safety Program Current Approach & Methodology

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Outlet stabilization structure

Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway

IUCN Guidelines to Avoid Impacts of Water Resources Projects on Dams and Other Water Infrastructure

Moving Small Mountains Vesuvius Dam Rehab

Managing Our Water Retention Systems

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

CLIFTY CREEK PLANT MADISON, INDIANA

Small Dam Repair The Stone Lake Dam Story. Joe Barron, P.E. SynTerra formerly the Fletcher Group, Inc. 148 River St. Suite 220 Greenville, S.C.

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

NRCS Overview. National Dam Safety Program Technical Workshop #19 February 22-23, 2012

Potential Impacts of Hydrofracturing on Dam & Levee Safety

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

February 4, Report Recommendations and NIPSCO Responses. 4.3 Maintaining and Controlling Vegetation Growth

DALLAS FLOODWAY TIMELINE

Final. Contact person: Colin Whittemore Aurecon Centre 1 Century City Drive Waterford Precinct, Century City Cape Town, South Africa

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

SEDIMENT/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN CONSTRUCTION CHECKLIST

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

PROPOSED REHABILITATION SAN CARLOS IRRIGATION PROJECT FACILITIES. Pinal County, Arizona. Scoping Information and Opportunity to Comment

Estabrook Dam A Discussion of Alternatives. Public Scoping Meeting June 5, 2014

Flood mitigation program for Gatun lake. Programa de mitigación de inundaciones del lago Gatún

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas

Amherst Dam. Michael Juris - Village President Joe Behlen, P.E. WDNR Dam Safety Engineer Gerald Krueger, P.E. AECOM

Stormwater/Wetland Pond Construction Inspection Checklist

CLEARWATER DAM BLACK RIVER, MISSOURI MAJOR REHABILITATION STUDY

ICOLD POSITION PAPER ON DAM SAFETY AND EARTHQUAKES

APPENDIX F. Baker County. Mason Dam Hydroelectric Project FERC No. P Turbidity Monitoring Plan

6.0 Results of Risk Analyses

CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL AT LOCKPORT REHABILITATION CASE STUDY. Brant Jones, P.E. 1 Thomas Mack, P.E. 2 Amy Moore, P.E.

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

Jackson Gulch Outlet Canal Rehabilitation Project

Understanding the Herbert Hoover Dike Rehabilitation Spillway, Plan 6 and EAA Storage Flow way Alternatives

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

Managing Complexity: Implementing an Ecosystem Restoration Program*

How To Manage Wildlife And Wildlife Damages At Earthen Dams

River Management 2013 Colorado Flood

Post-Flood Assessment

Table 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for

Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 3

STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

Disaster Recovery Managing and Leveraging Multiple Funding Sources

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Montgomery Reservoir Improvements

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

Shooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

USACE FORT WORTH DISTRICT DAMS AND LAKES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2007 FLOOD EVENTS. José Hernández 1 Fred Jensen 2 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Flooding Hazards, Prediction & Human Intervention

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Queensland Dam Safety Management Guidelines. February 2002

Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study

Nashville District Workload for Nashville SAME Professional Development Workshop

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

Penticton Creek May 4, 2015 Council Meeting

Boone Dam Seepage Remediation

Engineering Geological Asset Management for Large Dams. Yasuhito SASAKI (1)

Safety of Small/Rural Dams and Barrier Lake Management

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

LAKE OKEECHOBEE and THE HERBERT HOOVER DIKE. A Summary of the Engineering Evaluation of Seepage and Stability Problems at the Herbert Hoover Dike.

Neversink River East Branch

A CASE-STUDY OF CUA_DAT CFRD IN VIETNAM

Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Flood Mitigation Efforts April Fall 2013

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Management of flooding downstream of dams

Oakwood Beach Storm Damage Prevention Project NJDEP-Bureau of Coastal Engineering Glenn Golden, Project Manager U.S. Army Corps Civil Works Programs

How to Become a Navy Engineer For $78,000 in USD

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

How To Rehabilitate A Dam In A Lake Dike

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

US Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration US Army Corps of Engineers, North Pacific Division

Transcription:

Fort Worth District Public Meeting 20 August 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers

Lewisville Dam - Authorization Authorized by the River and Harbor Act, approved 2 March 1945 (Public Law 14, 79th Congress, 1st Section) This law authorized construction of a comprehensive program for the development of the water resources of the Trinity River basin consisting of four multi-purpose lakes (including Lewisville Lake) and two floodway projects. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 2

Lewisville Dam Authorized Purposes The primary authorized purposes of Lewisville Dam are: Flood Risk Management Water Supply Conservation C ti Pool P l was raised i d from f Elev El 515 to t Elev El 522 in 1988 for enhancement of water supply & for hydropower Subsequent authorizations added the purposes of: Recreation Environmental E i t l Stewardship St d hi Non Non--Federal Hydropower Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 3 BUILDING STRONG

Lewisville Dam - Benefits Lewisville Dam: Has prevented $31.2B in flood damages since completion in 1955 Provides $725.1M in annual public benefits including water supply, flood damage reduction, recreation & non-federal hydropower Provides camping, boating, fishing, swimming & picnicking opportunities for more than 3-million visitors annually Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 4

Lewisville Dam Key Features Water Supply Intake Intake Structure Main Embankment Spillway & Channel Outlet t Works & Channel EMBANKMENT DETAILS: Type: Homogeneous Earth Fill Length: 32,328 feet Crest Width: 20 feet Maximum m Height: 125 feet Top of Dam Elevation: 560.0 OTHER KEY PROJECT COMPONENTS: Intake Structure Outlet Works & Channel Spillway & Channel Water Supply Intake Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 5

Lewisville Dam Major Repair History Since the project was completed, the following major repairs have been made: Repair of Riprap (Nov 1966 May 1967) Embankment Modifications Upstream Berm (Jul 1979 May 1980) Downstream Berm (May 1981 Nov 1983) Upper Slope Rehabilitation (Jun 1983 - Apr 1984) Spillway Repair (Sep 1984 - Sep 1985) Spillwayp y Wall &SlabRepair (Oct 1987 - May 1988) Upstream Embankment & Erosion Repair (Oct 1995 - Jul 1996) Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 6

Lewisville Dam Addition of Hydropower In 1990, the project was modified to add non-federal hydropower facilities. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 7

Background, USACE Dam Safety Program: USACE Dam Safety program is a comprehensive program that has public safety as its primary objective. --- Life Safety is Paramount --- Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 8

The USACE Dam Safety Program includes: Routine project inspections to assess the condition of the project and compliance with operations and maintenance standards. Periodic assessment of project performance based on the latest design criterion, evaluation of project performance, and consideration of changes in the project area. Knowledge associated with safe dam engineering has grown significantly since Lewisville Dam was designed and constructed. Project performance since construction helps tell us what we need to evaluate. Land usage around the Lewisville Dam and lake are dramatically different than they were back in the 1950 s, so consequences are also different and have increased over time. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 9

As part of the Dam Safety program, in 2004 the US Army Corps of Engineers adopted a risk-informedinformed decision making process for evaluating each of the nearly 700 dams in its portfolio. Reliability of Structuralt Features Potential Consequences Risk = Probability of Failure x Consequences of Failure Risk was evaluated in terms of : life safety economic/property damages Aided in identifying & fixing the worst first Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 10

Under the Corps Risk Assessment (RA) process, a preliminary evaluation of Lewisville Dam was performed. Due to the very significant consequences, Lewisville dam is considered to be very high risk due to possible poor performance associated with uncontrolled seepage through the foundation. The consequences were considered to be unacceptable due to: Densely Populated Urban & Suburban Environment Critical Economic Infrastructure Environmental Impacts Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 11

Under the preliminary performed Corps Risk Assessment evaluation of Lewisville process, a Dam was As a result of the preliminary risk assessment, further analysis and evaluation to confirm safety issues and assess the actual level of risk at Lewisville is ongoing. Risk Assessment (more rigorous than the preliminary) Dam Safety Modification Study Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 12

Under the Risk Assessment, specific areas of concern associated with project performance were identified. These areas of concern include: Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 13

Lewisville Dam - Potential Instability of Spillway Weir Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 14

Lewisville Dam Instability of Spillway Channel Stability of the spillway channel has been an issue since shortly after it was excavated. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 15

Lewisville Dam Uncontrolled Seepage Uncontrolled seepage through the foundation has been observed in several areas. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 16

Lewisville Dam Potential Embankment Instability Embankment stability may be an issue due to the types of geologic materials in the embankment and foundation. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 17

Dam Safety Modification Study Purpose: Identify and recommend a plan that reduces the dam safety risk in the most expeditious and cost-effective way so that the project can safely provide the benefits for which it was authorized. As the DSMS progresses, we analyze the project under all design load conditions and evaluate performance based on the results. Once we understand this, we will develop appropriate ways to correct the problematic areas. Lewisville Dam reduces risk associated with flood damages, but does not entirely eliminate i it. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 18

Possible Dam Safety Issues: Uncontrolled Seepage. Water moving through the foundation could lead to erosion of the embankment Embankment Stability. The embankment may not be stable under higher pool loadings Spillway Stability. The concrete portions of the spillway may not be stable under higher pool loadings Spillway Channel Instability. The earthen channel continues to erode Potential Corrective Measures: Add filters, toe drains, berms, cutoffs Stabilize the embankment Stabilize the concrete weir Stabilize the channel slopes Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 19

Typical Methods for Correcting Seepage Problems: Construct Cutoff Walls Incorporate Filters Install Toe Drains Add Berms Combination of any or all the above Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 20

Commonly Used Methods for Correcting Stability Problems: Flatten Slopes & Increase Embankment Cross-Section Add Berms Incorporate Filters Combination of any or all the above Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 21

Lewisville Dam - IRRMs While studies and analyses are ongoing to develop appropriate modifications to the project, Interim Risk Reduction Measures are being implemented in order to address the concerns noted in the preliminary risk assessment. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 22

Status t of remaining i IRRMs: Lewisville Dam - IRRMs Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 23

The region delineated by the yellow line identifies project lands that may potentially be impacted by any future dam safety modifications. NEPA studies will be undertaken to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with construction of any proposed modifications. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 24

Dam Safety Modification Study Process: Identify dam safety issues and opportunities Estimate baseline risk condition Formulate alternative risk management plans Evaluate alternative risk management plans Compare alternative risk management plans Select a risk management plan We are here Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 25

Required Risk Management Alternatives (ER 1110-2-1156) No Action Continue Routine Operations and Maintenance Remove Dam Remove as much of the dam as required to restore the flood plain back to pre-dam condition Replace Dam Replace existing dam with a project that meets all USACE design standards & criteria Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 26

Required Risk Management Alternatives (ER 1110-2-1156) No Action Continue Routine Operations & Maintenance Remove Dam Remove as much of the dam as required to restore the flood plain back to pre- dam condition Replace Dam Replace existing dam with a project that meets all USACE design standards & criteria Remediation for Life-Safety Risk Reduction only Economic consequences are not considered for this alternative Remediate for all Identified Issues (Life & Economic Consequences) Make Interim Risk Reduction Measures Permanent Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 27

Lewisville Dam - The Bottom Line Although Lewisville Dam has been identified as very high risk by the US Army Corps of Engineers, it is functioning as designed. Dam failure is not likelyl due to completed Interim Risk Reduction Measures coupled with infrequent high reservoir pools The Dam Safety Modification Study for long term improvements is underway Public safety is our number one priority Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 28

EIS Public Scoping Meeting Purpose? National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Advise the general public of the initiation of the study. Seek input on problems, opportunities, and any environmental concerns in the study area Answer any questions on the study process Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 29

Environmental Impact Statement t t The purpose of an EIS is to ultimately help public officials make informed decisions that are a reflection of an understanding of environmental consequences and the alternative available. An EIS is required to describe: The environmental impacts of the proposed action; Any adverse environmental impacts that cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented; The reasonable alternatives to the proposed action; The relationship between local short-term uses of man s environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; and Any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved in the proposed action should the alternative be implemented. Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 30

NEPA Timeline Comments within 30 days Scoping runs the entire length of the project Next meeting will occur around Fall 2015 during the EIS Draft Report stage Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 31

Targeted DSMS Timeline Spring 2014 - Complete Baseline Risk Assessment Summer 2015 - Tentatively Selected Plan Fall 2015 - Draft EIS Report Complete & Public Review Summer 2016 Final EIS/ROD 2017-20182018 - Construction ti dependent d on funding cycles and USACE dam safety priorities Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 32

Thank you for your attention and interest in this project! Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 33

For EIS Related Comments, Contact: Hollie Hunter 817-886-1849 hollie.hunter@usace.army.mil Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers, Environmental Engineer Slides will be posted at WWW.SWF.USACE.ARMY.MIL following the meeting Lewisville DSMS, Public Meeting Slide 34