Lompoc City Council Agenda Item



Similar documents
Lompoc City Council Agenda Item

Budget Introduction Proposed Budget

SHARED SERVICES CONCEPTS Presentation to the Shared Services Committee Monday, November 29, 2010

Fleet Management Services

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District Board of Directors Meeting. September 12, 2011

Solid Waste Management

Memorandum SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

5. Environmental Analysis

COST PROPOSAL BID SHEET Nebraska Department of Roads Excavating Services. DISTRICT 1-Superintendent Area 110 EST QTY COST PER HOUR

Fund 110 Refuse Disposal

City of Santa Monica Expenditure Line Item Detail

Capital Project Development - definitions, Values and Funding

STATEMENT OF WILLIAM TOTH JR. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF VEHICLE MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BEFORE THE

SE-10 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. Objectives

City of Des Moines. Budget Workshop. November 23, 2015

City Budget - A Glossary of Useful Terms

Outdoor Storage of Raw Materials SC-33

Storm Drain System Operation and Maintenance

RULE 1193 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE

Board of Public Works

Description of Fund Types and Funds

Closed on All City of Buckeye Designated Holidays

COUNTY OF GREENVILLE EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

10 Mile Drain Remediation

IV. Orders, Quotations, Bids and Request for Proposal (RFP) Requirements

AN AUDIT OF THE FLEET MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF THE GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT S VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM

CITY OF TORONTO Fleet Services 2011 Recommended Operating Budget & Capital Plan. January 13, 2011

SECTION ELEVEN: ACTIVITIES REQUIRING A CERTIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1

OFFICE OF FLEET MANAGEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET TESTIMONY APRIL 22, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

Your Guide to Financing

Lane County, Oregon Statement of Net Assets June 30, Governmental Activities. Business-type

EQUIPMENT SERVICES DIVISION

Your Guide to Financing

Summit County Energy Plan - Goals A. Explanation and Comparison: State and Summit County Goals B. Measurement and Verification

DEBT MANAGEMENT. Debt Service Fund Leasing Fund Leasing Equipment Acquisition Fund

Activity Yes No N/A Notes

A Presentation to the Houston Hispanic Architects and Engineers

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,

WESTCHESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY BUDGET FINANCE AND PURCHASING POLICIES

Three Year Forecast Revenues and Expenditures Special Revenue Fund

City of Sacramento, California Department of Utilities. March 2011

Presentation of DISTRICT OF HOUSTON TO 2014 Financial Plan

Papich Construction, Inc. Experiences Dramatic Growth Through Vertical Integration And Diversification

STANDARD INSPECTION FORM GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

Nebraska Public Schools: Statutes Related to the Construction of Improvements to Real Property

City of Chula Vista. Fiscal Year Proposed Budget Overview. May 9 and 18, 2016

Water Conservation and the State s New Green Building Code for Residential Construction

LONG TERM OBLIGATION (LTO) FINANCING POLICY A Strategy for the Acquisition or Replacement of City Assets

Fleet Management Department FY2015 Core Services Presentation

Department of General Services

State of South Carolina Policy for Use of Purchasing/Payment Document Type

Fuel-Efficient and Alternative-Fuel Vehicles Community Stories and Snapshots

Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc. Mark J. Quimby Project Consultant

Capital Improvement Program: Public Input and the Need for a Multi-year Plan

Table of Contents ESF

Beseck Switching Station Inspection

TABLE OF CONTENTS CENTRAL SERVICES FUND

MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Management Response to Performance Review of Fleet Services Division, Report No

Developing a Capital Improvements Program A Manual for Massachusetts Communities

BEFORE THE PHILADELPHIA WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER RATE BOARD DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEPHEN J. FURTEK

FLEET MANAGEMENT FUND

Rio Hondo Community College District Measure A General Obligation Bonds Performance Audit July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 With Report of

Financial Management & Rate Structures

Preservation projects. Programmatic projects. Grant projects.

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL NEWSLETTER Fall Greetings 2013

STUDENT LOAN AUTHORITY

Intermediate Accounting

California State Accounting Manual Object Classification Description. Descriptions for District Sub-Account Codes Associated with the Major Object

Greater Los Angeles County Region

SPRINGVILLE CITY STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014

I. What is a Lease? II. Advantages and Disadvantages of Leasing. Leasing WASBO Purchasing Handbook -Chapter 6

Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy

Director of Utilities. Manager. Distribution Supervisor. Utilities Analyst. Account Clerk. Water. Conservation Specialist.

CHARLESTON COUNTY COMBINING STATEMENTS - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS

Vernon Lee Whitehurst Cypress Preserve Parkway Orlando, Florida Home Phone: Cell Phone:

Low Impact Development Checklist

STORM DRAIN PIPE MAINTENANCE. a. Develop standard operating procedures for maintaining storm drain pipes.

Horry County Preventive Maintenance Costs

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. for CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES. for the ENCINA WASTEWATER AUTHORITY FY 2015 MAJOR PLANT REHABILITATION PROJECT

White Goods Accounting Worksheet

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN

Vendor Application nd Annual Fiesta Old Town Cinco de Mayo

ASSOCIATED STUDENTS, INCORPORATED CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH DATE SUBMITTED: 04/23/2014

CITY OF DEWITT Page 1 Regular City Council Meeting Tuesday, May 13, 2014

SAN MATEO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION CLASS TITLE: ADMINISTRATOR, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES

Central Fire Protection District Of Santa Cruz County th Avenue Santa Cruz, CA

DEBT MANAGEMENT. Debt Service Fund Leasing Fund Leasing Equipment Acquisition Fund

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

How to Estimate the Cost of Support of Excavation for Foundation Installation. CPE Candidate No May 15, 2013

LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMISSION

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TEMPLATE. 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.1 Project Name and Location Date

This is a draft document for review by the Oregon Greenhouse Gas Reporting Advisory Committee April 1, 2010

Financial Policies

Waste Handling & Disposal

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Receiving Water Body:

School Bus Financing for Municipalities

Engineering Major Service Actual Budget Projected Request Executive Adopted

E 3 GOVERNMENT KEY FOCUS AREA TEAM

Transcription:

Lompoc City Council Agenda Item City Council Meeting Date: August 20, 2013 TO: FROM: Laurel M. Barcelona, City Administrator Ray Ambler, Purchasing and Materials Manager r_ambler@ci.lompoc.ca.us Anthony Garcia, Fleet and Facilities Superintendent a_garcia@ci.lompoc.ca.us Claudia Stine, Solid Waste Superintendent c_stine@ci.lompoc.ca.us SUBJECT: Purchase One 24-Cubic-Yard Scraper (Scraper) Vehicle for Approximately $855,704 Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council: 1) Approve the purchase of a Scraper for approximately $855,704; 2) Award a contract to the Quinn Company of Santa Maria, California for the purchase of the Scraper in that amount; and 3) Authorize the Purchasing and Materials Manager to issue a Purchase Order for the Scraper in that amount. Background: The City of Lompoc s (City) inventory of replacement fleet vehicles are tracked by the Fleet Division s vehicle tracking software for the entire useful life of each vehicle. Upon acquisition, vehicle information is entered into the tracking software. Included in the initial setup of the vehicle in the system are estimates for the vehicle life and the estimated replacement cost for the vehicle at its estimated end of life. The Scraper in the replacement fleet inventory was originally purchased in April 1990, had an estimated 15-year life, and was assigned to the Solid Waste Utility s Landfill Division. Since 2005, the end of the original estimated useful life of the Scraper, it was determined the Scraper was economic to operate further, rather than replacing it at the originally estimated replacement period. This determination was made based on analysis of lifetime vehicle costs tracked in the fleet vehicle tracking system. In preparation for the City s biennial budget for FY 2013-15, the existing Scraper assigned to the Solid Waste

Page 2 of 5 Utility s Landfill Division was identified to be replaced after determining that it was no longer economical to operate, as compared with the lifetime operational and capital costs of a replacement Scraper. The 1990 Scraper eventually was continued beyond its original life expectancy for five biennial budgets from 2005 to 2013, until it was determined it was time to be replaced in the 2014-15 fiscal year of the FY 2013-15 Budget cycle, due to its rising operational costs. The Scraper is used to haul material, including ground wood and green waste or soil, to cover the active working face (trash pile) of the Landfill on a daily basis. The Scraper is also used to haul native material from the borrow canyon, located adjacent to the southeast corner of the landfill, to mix with water treatment plant filter material. Once mixed, the material is stockpiled and hauled by the Scraper, as required, to cover the trash pile. Annually, by October 1, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board) requires the Landfill be prepared for the upcoming wet weather season. For 2013, the measures required by the Board to prepare for the rainy season include excavating the storm drain basin at the corner of Olive Avenue and Avalon Street, and the related channel, to increase the storage capacity of the storm drain to allow sediment to settle out of the storm water. Availability of the Scraper to complete these storm drain improvements is critical to comply with the requirements by the October 1 deadline. The budgeted replacement date for the Scraper in FY 2014-15 is 10 years past the replacement date of FY 2004-05, originally projected in 1990. Although the annual review of the operational cost of the Scraper indicated a FY 2014-15 replacement date, the existing Scraper experienced major transmission failure on July 15, 2013. The estimated cost to repair the transmission is $18,117. In reviewing the economic life of the current vehicle, as compared with purchasing a replacement vehicle this year rather than in the FY 2014-15 budget period, expenditure of the $18,117 is not warranted. The Landfill Division, the Solid Waste Utility and the City of Lompoc have all received substantial benefits from the use of the Scraper for almost 10 years more than originally anticipated. Since the July 15 failure, the Landfill has been without the services of the Scraper. As the Scraper is utilized almost daily and is required to fulfill the required storm water improvements by October 1, 2013, the approval and acquisition of the replacement Scraper is imperative to the Landfill operations. Solid Waste and Fleet staff have worked with Quinn Companies of Santa Maria to secure a temporary rental unit to avoid missing the storm drain improvements deadline. The contract for purchase of the Scraper provides for a credit on the rental costs due to the circumstances. The purchase would trigger the credit at a predetermined amount based on the total time of use of the rental Scraper.

Page 3 of 5 Discussion: Budgeting for replacement fleet vehicles is a joint process shared by the Finance and Fleet Divisions. Several factors are considered in evaluating replacement fleet vehicles programmed for replacement in the upcoming budget. Primary operational factors include the evaluation of the expected useful life, current annual operating costs (fuels, lubricants & maintenance), elapsed mileage, elapsed hours, repair history, estimated capital replacement costs, and other factors. If a replacement fleet vehicle is determined to have a smaller operational cost during the upcoming budget, as compared with the operational and capital cost of a replacement vehicle in the same budget period, the replacement vehicle s remaining life may be extended. Other factors considered in the evaluation process include the overall availability of resources throughout the City s various funds, as well as consideration of the total Citywide replacement vehicle needs during the anticipated two-year budget cycle under consideration. In the event a Department or Division s specifications for a replacement vehicle expand upon the specifications of the existing vehicle in the replacement fleet, or the Division or Department requests the replacement of a vehicle prior to the original replacement date, the requesting Department/Division provides a contribution to the Fleet Division for the incremental costs in excess of what would have otherwise been needed to provide a like-kind replacement at the regular replacement term. The accumulated assigned value for any vehicle in the replacement Fleet at any point in time is essentially the estimated cost of replacement divided by the number of years in its useful life, multiplied by the number of years in service. As a number of vehicles in the replacement fleet have been determined to have economic useful lives beyond the originally-assigned estimated life, the past practice has been to continue the allocation of the internal service charges for fleet replacements based on the pro-rata share of the vehicle s replacement value, as compared with the entire fleet s replacement value. This method has allowed for a relatively stable allocation of replacement costs to using Departments/Divisions. However, as the useful economic life of certain vehicles (such as the Scraper) exceed their original estimated useful life, the estimated replacement value is not adjusted to account for the additional time between replacements and the increase in replacement costs due to inflation. In the case of the Scraper, the original replacement value assigned was $547,718 if replaced in 2005. However, as noted above, the actual replacement value is $855,704. The actual replacement value is $6,741 more than the cumulative average annual replacement value over the 23 year 3 month operational life of the Scraper. As most replacement vehicles are carried over past their original expected life, the relative share of replacement costs remains constant. However, in the future, to better budget for replacements in the year of acquisition and to ensure Department and Divisional share of replacement costs are appropriate, replacement costs will be reevaluated for all vehicles in the replacement

Page 4 of 5 fleet that exceed their original replacement term as part of the budget preparation process. Fiscal Impact: Funds for the purchase of the Scraper have been appropriated in the 2014-15 fiscal year of the FY 2013-15 biennial Budget in account 73000-75000 Capital Outlay in the amount of $547,718. Funding for the appropriation is being provided from lease proceeds available from the recent solicitation of a financial lease for a group of replacement vehicles to be replaced during the FY 2013-15 Budget cycle. The cost of the Scraper exceeds the budgeted amount by $307,986, as explained above. As the Scraper failure occurred prior to the closing of the Request for Bids on the recently closed lease financing and refinancing project, the Request for Bids included a term change to provide for the financing of the Scraper for an estimated replacement amount of $897,718. Lease proceeds will be available for the full replacement cost of $855,704. The cost is below the revised budgeted amount by $42,014. The Landfill Division of the Solid Waste Utility will have their pro-rata share of the replacement fleet adjusted to reflect the replacement cost of the proposed Scraper. The overall allocation of replacement fleet costs will reflect the final lease amounts based on the purchase prices of all scheduled vehicles beginning in the FY 2015-17 Budget cycle. Lompoc Municipal Code (LMC) 3.36.040(D) reads the Purchasing Agent may arrange for the City to enter an agreement involving the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, vehicles, apparatus, or services in cooperation with another local, county, State, Federal, or other public entity, school district, or the League of California Cities under certain conditions. The Scraper is available under the National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance (NIPA) publicly solicited and awarded by the City of Tucson and the NIPA solicitation complies with LMC 3.36.040(D). The NIPA cooperative agreement provides for a 17 percent discount on the purchase price of the Scraper, or $162,282. The Quinn Company has also provided terms to rent a Scraper while the replacement Scraper is on order to credit monthly rental costs towards the purchase price of the Scraper. The amount of the credit begins at 90 percent of the rental costs for the first two months and reduces over time to 70 percent if the Scraper isn t purchased within six months. The credit would apply once the purchase transaction occurs. As the Landfill operations require the services of a Scraper, the rent-to-own terms are advantageous. Conclusion: The Scraper specifications and proposed contract have been reviewed by the Fleet and Facilities Superintendent and by the Solid Waste Superintendent, both of whom recommend the award of a contract to the Quinn Company of Santa Maria, California,

Page 5 of 5 for the purchase of the Scraper. As such, staff recommends the City Council approve the purchase via the award of a contract for one 24 Cubic-Yard Scraper to Quinn Company of Santa Maria, California (Caterpillar 2013 Model 627H Scraper) and authorize the issuance of a Purchase Order for the award. Respectfully submitted, Ray Ambler, Purchasing and Materials Manager Anthony Garcia, Fleet and Facilities Superintendent Claudia Stine, Solid Waste Superintendent APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Brad Wilkie, Management Services Director Kevin McCune, Public Works Director Larry Bean, P.E., Utilities Director APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL: Laurel M. Barcelona, City Administrator