Fund 110 Refuse Disposal
|
|
|
- Paul Baker
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Division of Solid Waste Disposal and a Resource Recovery Transfer Station Operations Administration a Mission To protect Fairfax County citizens against disease, pollution and other contamination associated with the improper disposal of refuse, through safe and sanitary transportation of solid waste from the I-66 Transfer Station to the I-95 Sanitary Landfill and the Energy/Resource Recovery Facility (E/RRF). The agency also transports debris generated through the Yard Waste program to disposal facilities in Prince William and Loudoun Counties. In addition, this agency operates the Household Hazardous Waste program and the Citizens Disposal Facilities, including all associated technical and administrative functions. Focus Fund 110,, has the primary responsibility for coordinating the disposal of solid waste generated within Fairfax County by channeling the collected refuse to the E/RRF. Refuse that cannot be burned in the E/RRF is directed to a landfill or disposed of through a contractor. Yard debris is transported to Prince William County or a private compost facility. Other operations coordinated within this fund are the Citizens Disposal Facilities (CDF), the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) program, the Ordinance Enforcement program, the White Goods program and the Battery program. The Administrative Cost Center performs the tasks associated with the overall administrative, technical and management functions for those funds that comprise the Division of Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery. These funds are: 110, ; 112, E/RRF; and 114, I-95. (Vol. 2) - 347
2 The County s solid waste disposal program has come under significant financial pressure due to a number of factors, most notably the adverse 1994 United States Supreme Court decision affecting solid waste flow control which allows waste to be hauled out of the County for disposal, as well as the development of several large landfills within Virginia and in neighboring states which are less expensive disposal options than those offered by the County s comprehensive solid waste management system. Under the current industry environment, the County has implemented a competitive pricing system. The pricing has proved to be sufficient to cover a majority of disposal costs, however public interest, non-revenue generating programs and some capital improvements in the past have been partially supported through a General Fund Transfer. As part of its deliberations on the, the Board of Supervisors approved fully eliminating the $2.5 million General Fund Transfer. The Advertised had proposed only a decrease of $1.25 million in the transfer. In order to offset this decrease the agency plans to adjust the discounted disposal rate in order to increase revenue, and it will postpone a number of Capital Equipment purchases. The transfer elimination allows General Fund resources to be redirected to meet other County requirements in the budget. In addition, on December 3, 2007 the Board of Supervisors approved a service agreement with Covanta allowing for the sale of electricity in excess of 80 megawatts, as a result an estimated $250,000 in additional revenue is anticipated to be generated in. In, the system disposal charge is set at $57 per ton, an increase of $5 over, to fully meet the operating and capital project requirements of this fund. A contractual discount disposal rate for will be negotiated with private waste haulers but is anticipated to be $55 per ton, an increase of $5.05 over the $49.95 per ton total in. The Citizen Disposal Facility system fee will remain at $57 per ton. The Punch Card Program offered to customers at the Citizen Disposal Facility will be discontinued by the end of, since the program has seen a significant reduction in usage since credit cards are now accepted. Based on these adjustments the total revenue for the fund is projected to be $64,602,699, an increase of $2,849,127 or 4.6 percent over the total of $61,753,572. Agency accomplishments, new initiatives and performance measures for Solid Waste are displayed at a program-wide level. Please refer to the Solid Waste Management Program Overview in Volume 2 of the for those items. Budget and Staff Resources FY 2007 Actual Agency Summary Revised Advertised Category Authorized Positions/Staff Years Regular 138/ / / / / 138 Expenditures: Personnel Services $8,552,820 $9,613,710 $9,613,710 $9,977,130 $10,074,528 Operating Expenses 50,881,264 53,087,129 53,142,782 51,725,610 51,725,610 Capital Equipment 1,706,589 2,497,600 1,703,662 2,528,000 2,279,000 Capital Projects 195, ,627,422 4,574,656 4,574,656 Subtotal $61,335,941 $65,198,439 $72,087,576 $68,805,396 $68,653,794 Less: Recovered Costs ($635,690) ($649,992) ($649,992) ($645,758) ($645,758) Total Expenditures $60,700,251 $64,548,447 $71,437,584 $68,159,638 $68,008,036 (Vol. 2) - 348
3 Summary by Cost Center Revised Advertised FY 2007 Category Actual Administration $812,527 $936,536 $938,710 $994,895 $1,008,326 Transfer Station Operations 59,692,456 63,611,911 62,871,452 62,590,087 62,425,054 Subtotal $60,504,983 $64,548,447 $63,810,162 $63,584,982 $63,433,380 Capital Projects $195,268 $0 $7,627,422 $4,574,656 $4,574,656 Total Expenditures $60,700,251 $64,548,447 $71,437,584 $68,159,638 $68,008,036 Position Summary Administration Transfer Station Operations 1 Director, DSWDRR 1 Supervisor of Facilities Support 1 Welder II 1 Public Works Environmental 5 Assistant Refuse Superintendents 16 Maintenance Workers Services Manager 3 Heavy Equipment Supervisors 3 Maintenance Trade Helper II 1 Engineer Technician II 1 Management Analyst II 1 Administrative Assistant II 1 Public Works Environmental 5 Engineering Technicians II 1 Safety Analyst Services Specialist 2 Engineering Technicians I 1 Code Specialist II 1 Management Analyst III 3 Environmental Technicians II 1 Welder I 1 Management Analyst II 8 Weighmasters 1 Network/Telecom Analyst II 68 Heavy Equipment Operators 1 Accountant II 1 Motor Equipment Operator 2 Administrative Assistants IV 3 Senior Maintenance Workers 3 Administrative Assistants III 1 Administrative Assistant II TOTAL POSITIONS 138 Positions / Staff Years Cost Center Summary Administration $1,008,326 Transfer Station Operations and Capital Projects $66,999,710 (Vol. 2) - 349
4 Funding Adjustments The following funding adjustments from the Revised are necessary to support the program: Employee Compensation $363,420 An increase of $363,420 in Personnel Services is associated with salary adjustments necessary to support the County s compensation program. As a result of budget constraints, compensation adjustments for County employees have been reduced. For, employee increases as part of the pay for performance system have been discounted by 50 percent and the impact of the lower pay for performance funding is reflected above. Operating Expenses ($1,626,443) A net decrease of $1,626,443 in Operating Expenses includes a decrease of $1,825,617 associated with decreased tipping fees charged by Fund 112, Energy/Resource Recovery Facility, based on trends in contractor compensation levels. This decrease is offset by an increase of $199,174, primarily for rental costs related to the lease, rather than purchase, of five refuse tractors due to be replaced, because it is more cost-effective. Capital Equipment $2,528,000 Funding of $2,528,000 has been included for Capital Equipment primarily for the replacement of items that have outlived their useful lifespan based on age, mileage and repair costs. Of the funding for replacement items, $1,065,000 is for the replacement for three rubber tire loaders bought under the Guaranteed Buy Back program. Other funding includes $600,000 for the replacement of three stationary cranes, $498,000 for the replacement of six refuse trailers, $143,000 for the replacement of four pick ups, $42,000 for the replacement of a tractor with broom, $40,000 for the replacement of a forklift, and $140,000 for one additional roll-off truck to support the redesigned Citizens Recycling Disposal Facility (CDF) at the I-66 Transfer Station. Purchase expenses will be partially offset by $747,293 in projected revenue associated with sale of the equipment being replaced. Department of Vehicle Services Charge $264,924 The Department of Vehicle Services Charge is a combined net increase based on adjustments for fuel price increases and vehicle maintenance requirements. Recovered Costs $4,234 A decrease of $4,234 to Recovered Costs reflects the anticipated level of recovered administration overhead costs from other Solid Waste funds, based on the Administration budget. Capital Projects $4,574,656 Funding in the amount of $4,574,656 has been included for Capital Projects for the construction of a Workers Facility at the I-66 Transfer Station to provide a suitable enclosed area for lunches, safety training, and storage of employee uniforms and equipment. This facility will replace two aged temporary trailers previously acquired from the Fire Department. Carryover Adjustments ($55,653) A decrease of $55,653 for the one-time carryover of Operating Expenses. (Vol. 2) - 350
5 Board of Supervisors Adjustments The following funding adjustments reflect all changes to the Advertised, as approved by the Board of Supervisors on April 28, 2008: Pay for Performance $97,398 An increase of $97,398 in Personnel Services is associated with the decision by the Board of Supervisors to eliminate the 50 percent reduction to employee increases as part of the pay for performance system. A reduction to pay for performance increases had been proposed in the Advertised due to budget constraints. However, as a result of the Board s decision, employees will be eligible for the full compensation increase for which they qualify based on performance. General Fund Transfer ($1,250,000) The Board of Supervisors approved the elimination of the General Fund Transfer of $1,250,000 proposed in the Advertised. In order to continue these programs, the transfer will be replaced by $980,901 in revenues by further increasing the proposed discounted rate charged to contractors to $55 per ton, $249,000 in Capital Equipment savings made possible by delaying the planned purchase of three refuse trailers, and $20,099 in fund balances. Changes to The following funding adjustments reflect all approved changes in the Revised since passage of the. Included are all adjustments made as part of the FY 2007 Carryover Review and all other approved changes through December 31, 2007: Carryover Adjustments $6,889,137 As part of the FY 2007 Carryover Review, the Board of Supervisors approved an increase of $6,889,137, including encumbered carryover of $55,653 in Operating Expenses and $812,062 in Capital Equipment. In addition the Board approved the carryover of $4,021,422 in unexpended project balances and an additional appropriation from fund balance in the amount of $2,000,000 for project construction at the Citizen s Disposal Facility including new disposal and recycling areas, a new stormwater management system and new asphalt pavement. The following funding adjustments reflect all approved changes to the Revised from January 1, 2008 through April 21, Included are all adjustments made as part of the Third Quarter Review: The Board of Supervisors made no adjustments to this fund. A Fund Statement, a Summary of Capital Projects, and a Project Detail Table for the projects funded in are provided on the following pages. The Summary of Capital Projects may include some projects without a Total Project Estimate amount. These projects are considered "continuing" projects or projects for which funding is necessary on an ongoing basis (e.g., a contingency or planning project). The Project Detail Table includes project location, description, and source of funding and completion schedules. (Vol. 2) - 351
6 FUND STATEMENT Fund Type G10, Special Revenue Funds Fund 110, FY 2007 Revised Advertised Actual Beginning Balance $9,306,853 $3,267,555 $11,728,629 $4,544,617 $4,544,617 Revenue: Interest on Investment $620,649 $154,040 $154,040 $215,637 $215,637 Revenue 58,151,732 60,293,510 60,293,510 61,591,579 62,572,480 Miscellaneous Revenue: White Goods $439,819 $425,022 $425,022 $437,289 $437,289 Rent of Equipment, Space 314, , , , ,000 Sale of Equipment 783, , , , ,293 Licensing Fees 77,859 50,000 50,000 80,000 80,000 Miscellaneous 233, , , , ,000 Subtotal Miscellaneous Rev. $1,849,646 $1,306,022 $1,306,022 $1,814,582 $1,814,582 Total Revenue $60,622,027 $61,753,572 $61,753,572 $63,621,798 $64,602,699 Transfers In: 1 General Fund (001) $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $1,250,000 $0 Total Transfers In $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $1,250,000 $0 Total Available $72,428,880 $67,521,127 $75,982,201 $69,416,415 $69,147,316 Expenditures: Personnel Services $8,552,820 $9,613,710 $9,613,710 $9,977,130 $10,074,528 Operating Expenses 50,881,264 53,087,129 53,142,782 51,725,610 51,725,610 Capital Equipment 2 1,706,589 2,497,600 1,703,662 2,528,000 2,279,000 Recovered Costs (635,690) (649,992) (649,992) (645,758) (645,758) Capital Projects 195, ,627,422 4,574,656 4,574,656 Total Expenditures $60,700,251 $64,548,447 $71,437,584 $68,159,638 $68,008,036 Total Disbursements $60,700,251 $64,548,447 $71,437,584 $68,159,638 $68,008,036 Ending Balance 3 $11,728,629 $2,972,680 $4,544,617 $1,256,777 $1,139,280 Reserves: Equipment Reserve 4 $3,129,027 $2,015,907 $3,037,975 $1,229,700 $1,114,785 Construction Reserve 5 8,547, ,806 1,442, PC Replacement Reserve 52,203 63,967 63,967 27,077 24,495 Unreserved Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Disposal Rate/Ton 6 $50.00 $52.00 $52.00 $57.00 $57.00 Discounted Disposal Rate/Ton 7 $46.95 $49.95 $49.95 $53.95 $55.00 (Vol. 2) - 352
7 1 The eliminates a $1.25 million General Fund Transfer. This subsidy is associated with specific refuse disposal programs that do not fully recover costs. Including the County's Recycling Program, the Household Hazardous Waste Program, the Citizen Disposal Facilities and the Code Enforcement Program. In order to continue these programs, funding will be offset by a $980,901 increase in revenues by increasing the proposed discounted rate to $55 per ton, a decrease of $249,000 in Capital Equipment made possible by delaying the purchase of three refuse trailers, and fund balances of $20, In, some Capital Equipment purchases have been delayed or cancelled to balance out the elimination of the General Fund Transfer. 3 Ending balance fluctuations are a result of operating and revenue requirements that change annually. Funding is carried forward each fiscal year to provide flexibility given the uncertainty of market conditions, tipping fee negotiations, and expenditure requirements. 4 The Equipment Replacement Reserve provides for the timely replacement of equipment required to operate the I-66 Transfer Station. Funds are transferred from revenue to the Equipment Replacement Reserve, as are proceeds from the sale of equipment. The reserve requirement is based on a replacement schedule, comprised of yearly payments to the reserve, which is based on the useful life of the vehicle/equipment. 5 The Construction Reserve provides for improvements at the I-66 Transfer Station such as the redesign and reconstruction of the Citizens Disposal Facility and the construction of a permanent structure containing employee facilities. In, all funds have been appropriated from this reserve. 6 The System Disposal rate is projected to increase to $57 per ton subject to market conditions. 7 In August 1998 (FY 1999), Fairfax County implemented a contractual rate discount that was offered to any hauler that guaranteed all of its collected refuse or a specified tonnage amount would be delivered to the Energy/Resource Recovery Facility (E/RRF) or other County disposal sites. The FY 2007 discounted rate was $46.95 per ton, the rate is $49.95, and the rate is projected to increase to $55.00 per ton subject to market conditions and negotiations. (Vol. 2) - 353
8 Summary of Capital Projects Fund: 110 Total Project Estimate FY 2007 Actual Expenditures Revised Budget Advertised Project # Description I-66 Transfer Station Expansion $20,443,330 $111, $7,616, $0 $ Citizens Disposal Facility 640,840 84, , Workers Facility 4,574, ,574,656 4,574,656 Total $25,658,826 $195, $7,627, $4,574,656 $4,574,656 (Vol. 2) - 354
9 Workers Facility I-66 Transfer Station Springfield Description and Justification: funding in the amount of $4,574,656 is included to support the construction of a Workers Facility at the I-66 Transfer Station to replace the existing work and training space currently housed in a used trailer. This facility is anticipated to be a two story 12,000 square foot building that contains office space for supervisors, a lunch room, a large conference room for employee training, locker rooms, showers, and adequate number of bathrooms for employees. Total Project Estimate Prior Expenditures FY 2007 Expenditures Revised Advertised Future Years Land gacquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Engineering Construction 4,574, ,574,656 4,574,656 0 Other Total $4,574,656 $0 $0 $0 $4,574,656 $4,574,656 $0 General Funding Source of Funding General Obligation Bonds Transfers from Other Funds Other Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $4,574,656 $4,574,656 (Vol. 2) - 355
Solid Waste Management
LOB #357: TRANSFER STATION OPERATIONS Purpose Approximately 70 percent of the municipal solid waste collected in the County for disposal is delivered to the I-66 Transfer Station. The Transfer Station
Fairfax County Solid Waste Management Objectives
Chapter 4 Fairfax County Solid Waste Management Objectives Incorporating the Overall Objectives for Fairfax County s Solid Waste Management Program in the SWMP This chapter presents the overall objectives
Fund 80000 Park Revenue and Operating Fund
Fairfax County Park Authority Board Director Public Information Officer Deputy Directors Park Foundation Strategic Initiatives and Policy Development Planning and Development Administration Resource Management
Fund 40030. Cable Communications
The Department of Cable and Consumer Services is the umbrella agency for four distinct functions: Consumer Services, Communications Policy and Regulation, Communications Productions, and Public Utilities.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 3. SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSAL
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 3. SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Within the City, solid waste management, including collection and disposal services
White Goods Accounting Worksheet
White Goods Accounting Worksheet The following worksheet was designed to help North Carolina counties accurately determine the annual reportable costs for managing white goods. Two tables are included
Fund 40050 Reston Community Center
Governing Board Administration Aquatics Leisure and Learning Arts and Events Mission To create positive leisure, cultural and educational experiences which enhance the quality of life for all people living
Fund 60030 Technology Infrastructure Services
Mission To provide a reliable and secure technology infrastructure foundation required to support County business processes and systems that strengthen the public service commitment of Fairfax County.
Department of Human Resources
Workforce Services Workforce Policy and Planning Department Management/ Human Resource Information Systems Employee Relations Employment Compensation and Workforce Analysis Employee Benefits Organizational
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM I POLICY The equipment management system provides detail and management information about replacement and operation costs for the County s rolling equipment.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION RECYCLING PROGRAM. Report 2008-S-142 OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER
Thomas P. DiNapoli COMPTROLLER OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER DIVISION OF STATE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY Audit Objectives...2 Audit Results - Summary...2 Background...3 Audit Findings and Recommendations...4
Department of Administration for Human Services
Operational Management Financial Management Human Resources Contracts and Procurement Management Physical Resources Mission The Department of Administration for Human Services promotes excellence across
ORDINANCE NO. 3 OF 2009
PENN TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 1301 Centerville Road Tel: 717-486-3104 Newville, PA 17241 Fax: 717-486-3522 Email: [email protected] Website: www.penntwpcc.org ORDINANCE NO. 3 OF
City of Key West, Florida Solid Waste Master Plan Executive Summary
The City of Key West (City) retained Kessler Consulting, Inc. (KCI) to assist in developing a Solid Waste Master Plan (Plan). The purpose of the Plan is to analyze the City s existing solid waste system,
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
MISSION STATEMENT The Information Technology department provides technology, telecommunications and information systems leadership and strategic planning while ensuring efficient, cost effective implementation
Department of Vehicle Services
LOB #299: FUEL OPERATIONS Department of Vehicle Services Purpose The Fuel Operations LOB is responsible for fuel operations at 53 sites and administration of commercial fuel credit cards. Fuel operations
Department of Public Works and Environmental Services Division of Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery
Department of Public Works and Environmental Services Division of Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery Revenue Collection Process Audit Final Report February 2008 promoting efficient & effective
FULL COST ACCOUNTING PRACTICAL GUIDANCE ON CONVERTING TO FCA
FULL COST ACCOUNTING PRACTICAL GUIDANCE ON CONVERTING TO FCA Government Finance Officers Association under Cooperative Agreement with US EPA February 2000 INTRODUCTION Governmental entities all across
TABLE OF CONTENTS CENTRAL SERVICES FUND
TABLE OF CONTENTS Central Services Fund Overview... 83 Income Summary with Requirements by Department and by Category... 83 Central Services Fund Resources... 84 Central Services Fund Resources Allocation
Members of the City of Bloomington Common Council Susie Johnson, Director, Department of Public Works Date: July 20, 2009
Department of Public Works 2010 Budget Proposal Memorandum To: From: Members of the City of Bloomington Common Council Susie Johnson, Director, Department of Public Works Date: July 20, 2009 In preparation
Information Technology and Communications
Information Technology and Communications City Council City Manager I INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS I '""""'"'"1:11 commimill!itlerrs: Mission Statement To establish strategies, policies and
APPENDIX C. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES
APPENDIX C. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES A. Generation A1. DEMOGRAPHIC information administrative or political area (area bounded by the administrative boundaries of the municipality
FY 2012 Total County - $388,239,166. FY 2012 Health County Dollars - $29,978,137. Medical Examiner 0.6%
Health Service Area FY 2012 Total County - $388,239,166 Health 7.7% FY 2012 Health County Dollars - $29,978,137 Medical Examiner 0.6% CenterPoint Human Svcs. 20.9% Public Health 78.5% OPERATING POLICIES
Public Works Program Area Summary
Overview The agencies in the Public Works program area have both an external and internal focus. They are responsible for designing and building County infrastructure, such as administrative buildings,
Table of Contents ESF-3-1 034-00-13
Table of Contents Primary Coordinating Agency... 2 Local Supporting Agencies... 2 State, Regional, and Federal Agencies and Organizations... 3 Purpose... 3 Situations and Assumptions... 4 Direction and
Fleet Management Services
Fleet Management Services MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Department of General Services Fleet Management Services (Motor Pool Internal Service Fund) is to plan for, acquire, maintain, and dispose
County Insurance. #296 Risk Management
#296 Risk Management Fund Overview The Risk Management Division of the Department of Finance oversees the County Insurance Fund. Its mission is to ensure the health and safety of County residents, employees,
Memorandum SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
T&E AGENDA: 05-07-12 ITEM: d(4) CITY OF ~ SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO - TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Memorandum FROM: Kerrie Romanow SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE DATE: TRANSITION
Human Resources. General Government 209. Prince William County FY 2014 Budget MISSION STATEMENT. Human Resources; 3.7%
Prince William Self- Insurance Group; 8.6% General Registrar; 2.5% Unemployment Insurance Reserve; 0.1% Board of County Supervisors; 4.4% Executive Management; 3.9% Audit Services; 1.0% County Attorney;
PROCEDURES FOR FILING MAJOR LOSS PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIMS (revised eff. 5-1-14)
APPENDIX 4: PROCEDURES FOR FILING MAJOR LOSS PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIMS (revised eff. 5-1-14) The Risk Management Office (RMO) will be the point of contact for any large property loss, or disaster, in order
Contracts. Definitions. Guidelines for contractors and subcontractors
0. Contractors www.revenue.state.mn.us 128 Sales Tax Fact Sheet What s New in 2014 The sales and use tax on repair and maintenance of certain business equipment has been repealed effective April 1, 2014.
THE PRICE OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN VERMONT
THE PRICE OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN VERMONT 2005 Overview of Survey Results FINAL REPORT July 2005 Prepared for: Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Solid Waste Program 103 South
Employee Benefits. To provide centralized budgetary and financial control over employee fringe benefits paid by the County.
Mission To provide centralized budgetary and financial control over employee fringe benefits paid by the County. Focus Agency 89, Employee Benefits, is a set of consolidated accounts that provide budgetary
County of Fairfax, Virginia
County of Fairfax, Virginia To protect and enrich the quality of life for the people, neighborhoods and diverse communities of Fairfax County Honorable Board of Supervisors February 26, 2007 County of
Amortization Cost. Depreciation. Overhead. Making Solid (Waste) Decisions With Full Cost Accounting 1EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA530-K-96-001 June 1996 1EPA Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5306W) Making Solid (Waste) Decisions With Full Cost Accounting Amortization Cost Depreciation
FACTS ABOUT: Recycling MONTGOMERY COUNTY RECYCLING
Maryland Department of the Environment FACTS ABOUT: Recycling MONTGOMERY COUNTY RECYCLING Coordinator/Staff Eileen Kao, Chief, Waste Reduction and Recycling Section Alan Pultyniewicz, Recycling Coordinator
Equipment and Fleet Maintenance Review
Internal Audit Issue Date: July 2014 Report Number: FY2014-04 Executive Summary AUDIT OF: Equipment and Fleet Maintenance Review DATE: Fieldwork performed May 2014 June 2014 AUDIT RATING: Acceptable [
Solid Waste Assessment & Management Study
SANTA FE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AGENCY CITY OF SANTA FE AND SANTA FE COUNTY Solid Waste Assessment & Management Study FINAL REPORT December 201 3409 Executive Center Drive Suite 128 Austin, TX 78731 Phone:
Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission
Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission ITEM # DECISION TOPIC Notice of Intended Action: Chapter 100 Scope of Title Definitions Form Rules of Practice Chapter 101 - Solid
Page Intentionally Left Blank
Page Intentionally Left Blank Department Description The Debt Management Department conducts planning, structuring, and issuance activities for all City financings to fund cash flow needs and to provide
K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY. 1. Applicant's Name
K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY 1. Applicant's Name Address (Street or Rural Route) (City & State) (Zip) Person to contact Title Phone Fax
Office of Emergency Management
Emergency Management Mission In cooperation with internal and external partners, enhance public protective actions and promote domestic preparedness through a comprehensive and effective emergency management
This policy applies to the Department of Administration, and covers vehicles operated and owned/leased/rented by the Department of Administration.
State of Minnesota Department of Administration Fleet Management Policy I. Definitions A. Addition to the Fleet the acquisition of a vehicle that will increase the fleet size B. Automobile passenger car
udget For Local Property Tax Revenues
REVENUES 37 Property Tax Revenue Trend 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 Dollars 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 - Note: Top part of Personal Property bar is State revenue received from Personal
Joint Budget Development Committee Q&A. Response to Questions from the JBDC
Joint Budget Development Committee Q&A Response to Questions from the JBDC Request by: School Board Member Storck Question: Response: Provide additional information on the market-based pay studies used
5. Environmental Analysis
5.11 The potential for adverse impacts on utilities and service systems was evaluated based on information concerning current service levels and the ability of the service providers to accommodate the
OTHER FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS
OTHER FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS, SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OTHER FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Fund No. 530 Correctional Facilities Construction Fund 541 Correctional Facilities
City of Richmond Department of Public Utilities
City of Richmond Department of Public Utilities Wastewater Treatment Plant EMS Case Study Profile City of Richmond (COR), home to the James River, is in the heart of Virginia and known for its pleasant
Employee Benefits. To provide centralized budgetary and financial control over employee fringe benefits paid by the County.
Mission To provide centralized budgetary and financial control over employee fringe benefits paid by the County. Focus Agency 89, Employee Benefits, is a set of consolidated accounts that provide budgetary
RISK MANAGEMENT Hueston Whiteside
Risk Management 191 DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT Hueston Whiteside Risk Management seeks to minimize the frequency and severity of financial loss to the County through an Integrated Risk
CHAPTER 11. MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
CHAPTER 11. MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE Sections: 11-1 Title. 11-2 Definitions and rules of construction. 11-3 Who may collect, transport and dispose of municipal solid waste. 11-4 Licensing procedure - Fee.
USING ROUTING SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION COSTS, DEFININGPROCUREMENT AREAS & ROUTES
USING ROUTING SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION COSTS, DEFININGPROCUREMENT AREAS & ROUTES SWANA Collection Symposium 2004 Presented by: Kevin Callen WasteBid.com, Inc. Routing Software Its
Facility Rules & Regulations for the I-95 Landfill Complex
Facility Rules & Regulations for the I-95 Landfill Complex I-95 LANDFILL COMPLEX & ENERGY/RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY RULES AND REGULATIONS () 703-690-1703 In order to provide efficient and economical disposal
City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation Business Development Services
City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation Business Development Services OUR MISSION IS TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES...2-5 EFFORTS TO FACILITATE
Resident Guide A Guide for Your Local Services
Resident Guide A Guide for Your Local Services Commuting The Texoma Area Paratransit Service (TAPS) provides residents of Gainesville and Cooke County van and bus service. Call the TAPS office at 1-800-256-0911
Legislative Council Panel on Security. Construction of an Ambulance Depot at Choi Shun Street, Sheung Shui
LC Paper No. CB(2)2452/11-12(03) For discussion on 4 July 2012 Legislative Council Panel on Security Construction of an Ambulance Depot at Choi Shun Street, Sheung Shui PURPOSE This paper consults the
Product Marketing Guide. We re On The Road With You
Product Marketing Guide We re On The Road With You Underwriting Appetite Trucking with a radius of up to 1,000 miles between terminals Target classes include: + Waste Haulers + Concrete Mix-In Transit
FLEET MANAGEMENT FUND
FLEET MANAGEMENT FUND Mission Statement "The mission of the Fleet Management Fund is to provide necessary vehicles and equipment as well as repairs and mainenance on these vehicles and equipment to various
SOUTH BAYSIDE WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 2015 FINAL LONG RANGE PLAN
SOUTH BAYSIDE WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 2015 FINAL LONG RANGE PLAN June 25, 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS i Acknowledgements SBWMA/RethinkWaste Staff Monica Devincenzi, Recycling and Outreach Sustainability Manager
