Vector Network Analyzer Techniques to Measure WR340 Waveguide Windows



Similar documents
Agilent Measuring Noninsertable Devices

Network Analysis. Specifying calibration standards for the HP 8510 network analyzer Product Note A

2. The Vector Network Analyzer

Agilent De-embedding and Embedding S-Parameter Networks Using a Vector Network Analyzer. Application Note

Agilent AN In-Fixture Measurements Using Vector Network Analyzers

Applying Error Correction to Network Analyzer Measurements. Application Note Table of Contents. Page

Impedance 50 (75 connectors via adapters)

Agilent PN In-fixture Microstrip Device Measurements Using TRL* Calibration. Product Note

ECE 435 INTRODUCTION TO THE MICROWAVE NETWORK ANALYZER

Experiment 7: Familiarization with the Network Analyzer

Agilent Specifying Calibration Standards for the Agilent 8510 Network Analyzer

Advanced Calibration Techniques for Vector Network Analyzers

Agilent Network Analysis Applying the 8510 TRL Calibration for Non-Coaxial Measurements

Agilent PN RF Component Measurements: Amplifier Measurements Using the Agilent 8753 Network Analyzer. Product Note

Agilent 8720 Family Microwave Vector Network Analyzers

AUTOMATIC NETWORK ANALYZER PROCEDURES FOR 5045 KLYSTRON CAVITIES * J.G. Judkins

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN VECTOR NETWORK ANALYZER

Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) Calibration: The Basics

75 Ω Transmission System

1. The Slotted Line. ECE 584 Microwave Engineering Laboratory Experiments. Introduction:

Probes and Setup for Measuring Power-Plane Impedances with Vector Network Analyzer

Michael Hiebel. Fundamentals of Vector Network Analysis

HEWLETT PACKARD. HP 8510C Network Analyzer 45 MHz to 110 GHz. Unmatched excellence in microwave network analysis

A Comparison of Measurement Uncertainty in Vector Network Analyzers and Time Domain Reflectometers. White Paper

Performing Amplifier Measurements with the Vector Network Analyzer ZVB

Introduction. Description of Measurement Techniques

UNDERSTANDING NOISE PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS (AN )

Selecting Microwave/RF Cable Assemblies for Reliable Performance Over Time. White Paper

Comparison of Vector Network Analyzer and TDA Systems IConnect Generated S-Parameters

Measurements in 75 Ω Coaxial Transmission Lines

Agilent Electronic Calibration (ECal) Modules for Vector Network Analyzers

Category 8 Cable Transmission Measurements Comparative Study between 4-port single wire measurements and 2-port balun measurements

Cable Impedance and Structural Return Loss Measurement Methodologies

Using Simple Calibration Load Models to Improve Accuracy of Vector Network Analyzer Measurements

spinner Measurement & Calibration equipment for network analyzers

Connectivity in a Wireless World. Cables Connectors A Special Supplement to

3.3 Calibration standards

Agilent Stripline TRL Calibration Fixtures for 10-Gigabit Interconnect Analysis. White Paper

Shielding Effectiveness Test Method. Harbour s LL, SB, and SS Coaxial Cables. Designs for Improved Shielding Effectiveness

Measurement & Modeling Device Characterization Solutions

Agilent 8753ET/8753ES Network Analyzers

MAURY. VNA Calibration Kits, Microwave Components & Adapters. Calibrate With Confidence IN THIS CATALOG:

February 2010 Number Vector Network Analyzer upgrade to SureCAL Power Sensor and RF Components Packages

Agilent 8510C Network Analyzer

One Port Network Analyzer

Network Analyzer Basics- EE142 Fall 07

Sound Power Measurement

Agilent Time Domain Analysis Using a Network Analyzer

Cable Analysis and Fault Detection using the Bode 100

Keysight Technologies Understanding the Fundamental Principles of Vector Network Analysis. Application Note

Agilent Advanced impedance measurement capability of the RF I-V method compared to the network analysis method. Application Note

Copyright 1996 IEEE. Reprinted from IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium 1996

Technical Datasheet Scalar Network Analyzer Model MHz to 40 GHz

Introduction to Network Analyzer Measurements

APPLICATION NOTES POWER DIVIDERS. Things to consider

MATRIX TECHNICAL NOTES

Application Note Noise Frequently Asked Questions

Techniques for precise cable and antenna measurements in the field

When designing. Inductors at UHF: EM Simulation Guides Vector Network Analyzer. measurement. EM SIMULATION. There are times when it is

Agilent FieldFox RF Vector Network Analyzer N9923A Quick Reference Guide

RF Network Analyzer Basics

Agilent 10 Hints for Making Better Network Analyzer Measurements. Application Note B

MEASUREMENT OF COMPLEX PERMITTIVITY OF LIQUIDS USING WAVEGUIDE TECHNIQUES

AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

OPERATION MANUAL. Pen type, separate electrode SOIL PH METER Model : PH-220S

SIGNAL GENERATORS and OSCILLOSCOPE CALIBRATION

A wave lab inside a coaxial cable

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

MEASUREMENT OF CRYOGENIC PERFORMANCE OF 4-8 GHz PAMTECH ISOLATORS S/N Juan Daniel Gallego Isaac López Fernández Carmen Diez González

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. California Polytechnic State University SIGNAL TRANSMISSION LABORATORY EE 353

Utilizing Time Domain (TDR) Test Methods For Maximizing Microwave Board Performance

Tuning a Monopole Antenna Using a Network Analyzer

High Power Amplifier Measurements Using Agilent s Nonlinear Vector Network Analyzer

Agilent X/P/K281C Adapters

Engineering Sciences 151. Electromagnetic Communication Laboratory Assignment 3 Fall Term

Agilent Test Solutions for Multiport and Balanced Devices

R&S ZVA-Z75, -Z110, -Z140, -Z170, -Z220, -Z325, -Z500 Converters Quick Start Guide

Agilent 8757D Scalar Network Analyzer 10 MHz to 110 GHz

Antenna Properties and their impact on Wireless System Performance. Dr. Steven R. Best. Cushcraft Corporation 48 Perimeter Road Manchester, NH 03013

Wireless RF Distribution in Buildings using Heating and Ventilation Ducts

Experiments Using the HP8714 RF Network Analyzer

RX-AM4SF Receiver. Pin-out. Connections

0HDVXULQJWKHHOHFWULFDOSHUIRUPDQFH FKDUDFWHULVWLFVRI5),)DQGPLFURZDYHVLJQDO SURFHVVLQJFRPSRQHQWV

Design of 2D waveguide networks for the study of fundamental properties of Quantum Graphs

The Design & Test of Broadband Launches up to 50 GHz on Thin & Thick Substrates

a 1 a 2 2 Port b 2 b 1 Multi-Port Handset Switch S-Parameters Application Note AN20 Seven-Port S-Parameter Definition Introduction Summary:

iva Cable & Antenna Analyzer

Introduction to acoustic imaging

You will need the following pieces of equipment to complete this experiment:

RF data receiver super-reactive ASK modulation, low cost and low consumption ideal for Microchip HCS KEELOQ decoder/encoder family. 0.

Digital Systems Ribbon Cables I CMPE 650. Ribbon Cables A ribbon cable is any cable having multiple conductors bound together in a flat, wide strip.

Calculating Antenna System Return Loss As Viewed Through The RF Path

A Network Analyzer For Active Components

A sures the complex scattering parameters of a microwave

14.5GHZ 2.2KW CW GENERATOR. GKP 22KP 14.5GHz WR62 3x400V

R&S ZNC Vector Network Analyzer Specifications

AVX EMI SOLUTIONS Ron Demcko, Fellow of AVX Corporation Chris Mello, Principal Engineer, AVX Corporation Brian Ward, Business Manager, AVX Corporation

APN1001: Circuit Models for Plastic Packaged Microwave Diodes

Data Transmission. Data Communications Model. CSE 3461 / 5461: Computer Networking & Internet Technologies. Presentation B

R&S ZNBT8 Vector Network Analyzer Specifications

Transcription:

LS-296 Vector Network Analyzer Techniques to Measure WR340 Waveguide Windows T. L. Smith ASD / RF Group Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory June 26, 2002 Table of Contents 1) Introduction 2) Objective 3) Full Two-Port Calibration 4) TRL (Thru-Reflect-Line) 5) TRL / WR340 Waveguide Window Measurement 6) Conclusions 7) References 1. Introduction In its fundamental form, network analysis involves the measurement of incident, reflected, and transmitted waves that travel along transmission lines. Measuring both magnitude and phase of components is important for several reasons. First, both measurements are required to fully characterize a linear network and ensure distortionfree transmission. To design effective matching networks, complex impedances must be measured. In the development of computer-aided-design (CAD) circuit simulation programs, magnitude and phase data are required for accurate models. In addition, timedomain characterization requires magnitude and phase information in order to perform an inverse Fourier transform [1]. To acquire accurate data using network analyzers special care must be taken when performing calibrations and measurements. Various calibrations and measurement techniques using a vector network analyzer (HP8510C) will be discussed. The design of a WR340 waveguide rf window will be used as an example for explaining some of these techniques.

2. Objective A major problem encountered when making network measurements is the need to separate the effects of the transmission medium from the device characteristics. While it is advantageous to be able to predict how a device will behave in the environment of its final application, it can be difficult to measure this way. In most microwave measurements, systematic errors are the most significant source of measurement uncertainty. Systematic errors are caused by imperfections in the test equipment and test setup. If these errors do not vary over time, they can be characterized through calibration and mathematically removed during the measurement process [2]. The process of removing systematic errors from the network analyzer S-parameter measurement is called measurement calibration. 3. Full Two-Port Calibration A measurement calibration is a process that mathematically derives the error model for the network analyzer. This error model is an array of vector coefficients used to establish a fixed reference plane of zero phase shift, zero magnitude, and known impedance. A full two-port error model is only one example of the measurement calibrations available with the HP8510. The measurement calibration process for the HP8510 must be one of seven types: Response, Response & Isolation, S11 1-Port, S22 1-Port, One Path 2-Port, Full 2- Port, and TRL 2-Port [3]. The type of measurement calibration selected by the user depends on the device to be measured and the extent of accuracy desired. A combination of calibrations can be used in the measurement of a particular device. A Full 2-Port includes both forward and reverse error terms. For this calibration, the standards from a calibration kit would be applied to both ports during the calibration procedure. A calibration kit is a set of physical devices called standards. Each standard has a precisely known or predictable magnitude and phase response as a function of frequency. In order for the HP8510 to use the standards of a calibration kit, the response of each standard is mathematically defined and then organized into standard classes that correspond to the error models used by the HP8510. In conventional two-port calibration, three known impedance references and a single transmission standard are required. The most common coaxial standards are zeroelectrical-length short, shielded open, and matched load terminations, which all ideally have fixed magnitude and broadband phase response [4]. The accuracy of subsequent test device measurements is dependent on the following: 1) the accuracy of the test equipment, 2) how well the known devices (standards) are modeled, and 3) the exactness of the error correction.

4. TRL (THRU-REFLECT-LINE) TRL refers to the three basic steps in the calibration process: 1) THRU connection of port 1 and port 2, directly or with a short piece of transmission line. 2) REFLECT connect identical one-port high reflection coefficient devices to each port. 3) LINE insert a short length of transmission line between port 1 and port 2 (different line lengths are required for the THRU and LINE). Unlike coaxial measurements, a set of three distinct impedance standards are often impossible to produce for noncoaxial transmission media. The new TRL calibration technique relies only on the characteristic impedance of a short transmission line. From two sets of two-port measurements that differ by this short length of transmission line and two reflection measurements, the full 12-term error model can be determined. Due to the simplicity of the calibration standards, TRL can be applied in dispersive transmission media such as microstrip, stripline, and waveguide. Vector error correction techniques can greatly reduce the effects of directivity, crosstalk, source match, and frequency response errors. The 12-term error model is used in both the Full 2-Port and the TRL 2-Port calibration types and provides the highest accuracy in common use today [5]. THRU-REFLECT-LINE is an approach to two-port calibration that relies on transmission lines rather than a set of discrete impedance standards. Although its mathematical derivation is different than the conventional Full 2-Port, application of the technique results in the same 12-term error correctional model. While there is only one discrete standard required in the TRL calibration process compared to the conventional Full 2- Port method, its mathematical solution is not quite as simple. A total of 16 measurements is required to quantify the 12 unknowns. Because there are more measurements than unknowns, two constants defining the calibration devices can also be determined. The complex reflection coefficient of the REFLECT standard and the propagation constant of the LINE are determined [6]. This is significant because these characteristics do not have to be specified. In other calibration approaches the resultant measurement accuracy is dependent on how well all of the standards are known. When applying TRL, accuracy is not compromised even though these characteristics are unknown. The characteristic impedance of the transmission LINE becomes the measurement reference and therefore has to be known or assumed ideal.

There are three key advantages gained when using transmission lines as reference standards: 1) Transmission lines are among the simplest elements to realize in many noncoaxial media. 2) The impedance of transmission lines can be accurately determined from physical dimensions and materials. 3) Transmission lines have traditionally been used as standards and are well understood. 5. TRL / WR340 Waveguide Window Measurement The process for implementing the TRL calibration method and measuring the 340 window will be described in five steps: 1) Selecting standards appropriate for the application that meet the basic requirements of the TRL technique. 2) Defining these standards for use with the HP8510 by modification of the internal calibration kit registers. 3) Performing the calibration. 4) Checking the performance. 5) Performing the WR340 waveguide window measurement. 1 ) Selecting Appropriate Standards: A) THRU (zero length) 1) S21 and S12 are defined equal to 1 at zero degrees (typically used to set the reference plane). B) REFLECT 1) Reflection coefficient magnitude need not be known. 2) Phase response need only be specified within a ¼ wavelength ± 90 degrees either way. 3) Reflection standard must be the same on both ports. C) LINE 1) Output impedance (Zout) of the LINE establishes the reference impedance after error correction is applied. 2) Attenuation of the LINE need not be known. 3) Optimal LINE length is ¼ wavelength or 90 degrees relative to the THRU at the center frequency. 4) Insertion phase of the LINE must never be the same as that of the THRU (zero or non-zero length). The insertion phase difference between the THRU and the LINE must be between 20 and 160 degrees. For example; if the THRU is zero degrees (not an offset

THRU), then the LINE must measure between 20 and 160 degrees for the calibration to be considered usable. Measurement uncertainty will increase significantly when the insertion phase nears 0 or an integer multiple of 180 degrees [6]. 2 ) Defining Standards and Modifying Calibration Kit Registers: a) THRU A zero length thru will be used. b) REFLECT Zero offset shorts, use WR340 waveguide blanking plates. c) LINE A existing 14.9-cm WR340 waveguide section will be used. WR340 waveguide upper and lower cut-off frequencies: 10 c 2.997925 10 cm/s f cut-off (lower) = = 2a 2 8.636 cm = 1735.7 MHz a = waveguide inside width (larger dia.) = 8.636 cm (3.4 inches) f cut-off (upper) = 2 f cut-off (lower) = 3471.4 MHz Using a 14.9-cm waveguide section as the LINE: Linear Delay = l ε (0.149m) 1.000649 r = 8 c 2.997925 10 10 12 = 497.2 ps l = offset length in meters - In waveguide, group velocity varies with frequency due to dispersion as a function of the cut-off frequency. Actual Delay = Linear Delay 2 1- (fco / f) = 497.2 ps 2 1- (1735.7 MHz / 2856 MHz) = 626.1 ps fco = lower cutoff frequency f = measurement frequency

- TRL LINE insertion phase requirements are between 20 and 160 degrees. Degrees (in the LINE) = 360 f 2 ( 1 (fco / f) ) l c = 9 (360) 2.856 10 Hz 2 ( 1 - (1735.7 / 2856) ) (0.149 8 2.997925 10 m/sec m) = 405.8 degrees 405.8 degrees = 45.8 degrees (Mod 360) The following data must be entered into the internal calibration registers of the HP8510 thru the front panel or via computer to perform the TRL Calibration: Standard C0 C1 C2 C3 Offset Frequency Coax or WG No. Type L0 L1 L2 L2 Delay Min. Max. (ps) Standard Label 14 Delay 0 1735.7 3471.4 W THRU 15 Delay 626.1 1735.7 3471.4 W LINE 1 18 Short 0 0 0 0 0 1735.7 3471.4 W SHORT Standard Class Assignments A B Standard Class Label TRL THRU 14 TRL THRU TRL REFLECT 18 TRL SHORT TRL LINE 15 LINE 14.9 3) Performing the Calibration: The HP8510 network analyzer Port 1 and Port 2 are each connected to a 7mm to WR340 waveguide transition via a 10-foot 7-mm Gore Phaseflex phase stable cable.

Bolt a 7-inch WR340 waveguide straight section to each transition (not to be loosened or removed during this procedure). The straight sections will eliminate any evanescent wave effects caused by the transitions. The two waveguide straight pieces are then bolted together for a thru measurement. The connection of these two waveguide straight pieces will serve as the TRL Reference Plane. Procedure: 1) HP8510 - set center freq, freq span, number of points, and averaging if necessary. HP8510 press a) Cal b) WR340 TRL (newly installed TRL cal kit) c) TRL 2-Port d) Thru, TRL Thru 2) Disconnect junction of waveguide straight pieces and connect a WR340 blanking plate (short) to each waveguide piece (both ports). HP8510 press a) S11 Reflect, TRL Short b) S22 Reflect, TRL Short c) Isolation d) Omit Isolation e) Isolation Done 3) Disconnect both WR340 blanking plates and bolt the 14.9 cm LINE waveguide section between both waveguide straight pieces. HP8510 press a) line/match, LINE 14.9 b) Save, TRL 2-Port c) Select cal set The Gore cables, waveguide transitions, and waveguide straight sections will now be calibrated out of the upcoming measurements.

4) Checking the Calibration Performance: Remove the 14.9 cm LINE section and bolt the two waveguide straight pieces back together, which will allow the calibration to be checked. Fig. 1 - TRL Calibration Figure 1 shows the calibration match in both directions (S11 and S22) to be 69 db at 2856 MHz with minimal insertion loss and the phase reference to be 0.03 degrees.

After the calibration is checked, the 14.9 cm LINE could be measured to compare against the calculated insertion phase. Reinstall the 14.9 cm LINE between both waveguide straight sections. Fig. 2 - TRL 14.9cm LINE Figure 2 is a measurement of the 14.9cm LINE waveguide section used as a device under test. The phase shift of the 14.9cm LINE measures -47 degrees as compared to our previously calculated value of -46 degrees. 5) Performing the WR340 Waveguide Window Measurement: Remove the TRL 14.9cm LINE and bolt the WR340 Waveguide Window between the two waveguide straight sections.

Fig. 3 - Window Measurement Setup These additional techniques will be helpful in acquiring accurate data: 1) Calibration must be rechecked after the measurement is completed. A repeatable calibration (Fig. 1) is essential for assuring measurement accuracy. 2) Use minimal coaxial cable movement during the calibration and after the calibration until the measurement is completed. Figure 3 shows a Newport optic table with countersunk cut threads, allowing for Port 1 test cable and a 7mm to waveguide transition to be shimmed to the right height and securely bolted before a calibration begins. 3) Two 10-foot Gore Phaseflex microwave cables are used to minimize effects caused by cable movements. These cables provide excellent phase and amplitude stability but do not suffer from the typical performance degradation associated with flexing traditionally designed flexible assemblies such as a standard Andrew heliax.

4) Temperature and or humidity must be held constant from the time of the calibration until the measurement of the device under test is completed. If the measurement is not done under a controlled environment and temperature or humidity changes, a recalibration and new measurement may be necessary. If temperature or humidity changes and a calibration recheck performed after the measurement indicates the calibration to be the same as the original calibration, then new measurements are not necessary. Note: Errors caused by cable movement or temperature / humidity changes may be noticed in the calibration recheck. As an example of this error; consider Fig. 1 where the calibration recheck shows S11 or S22 calibrated return loss to be 40dB or 50dB instead of 69dB. This calibration would not be considered repeatable. Fig. 4 - WR340 Waveguide Window (sn.001 ) Figure 4 shows the window return loss in both directions, S11 = -43.6dB and S22 = -46.6dB at 2856 MHz with an insertion loss of 0.02 db.

6. Conclusions With a typical Full 2-Port Calibration the open, load, and short calibration coefficients must be entered into the network analyzer registers. Over time and with usage if these coefficients no longer match the standards, an error will result. The TRL 2-Port calibration requires only a single impedance standard a transmission line. Transmission lines have been traditionally used as standards and are among the simplest elements to realize in many noncoaxial media. The impedance of a transmission line can be accurately determined from physical dimensions and materials. An unknown high reflection device and a thru connection are sufficient to complete this TRL technique. In the TRL solution, the complex reflection coefficient of the REFLECT standard and the propagation constant of the LINE are determined. This is significant because now these characteristics do not have to be specified. In other calibration approaches the resultant measurement accuracy is dependent on how well all of the standards are known. When applying TRL, accuracy is not compromised even though these characteristics are unknown. The TRL technique is not limited to dispersive transmission media and may also be used in making coaxial measurements. With precision coaxial transmission lines, TRL currently provides the highest accuracy in coaxial measurements available today. 7. References [1] Agilent Technologies AN 1287-1, Understanding the Fundamental Principles of Vector Network Analysis, August, 2000. [2] Agilent Technologies AN 1287-3, Applying Error Correction to Network Analyzer Measurements, July 25, 2001. [3] Agilent Technologies 8510C Network Analyzer System Operating Manual, January, 1994. [4] Hewlett Packard Product Note 8510-5A, Specifying Calibration Standards, February 1, 1988. [5] Hewlett Packard Product Note 8510-13, Measuring Noninsertable Devices, August 1, 1988. [6] Hewlett Packard Product Note 8510-8, Applying TRL Calibration, October 1, 1987.