NOAA Climate Reanalysis Task Force Workshop College Park, Maryland 4-5 May 2015



Similar documents
Climate Models: Uncertainties due to Clouds. Joel Norris Assistant Professor of Climate and Atmospheric Sciences Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Parameterization of Cumulus Convective Cloud Systems in Mesoscale Forecast Models

The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods

Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations

Measurement of the effect of biomass burning aerosol on inhibition of cloud formation over the Amazon

Clouds and the Energy Cycle

Data processing (3) Cloud and Aerosol Imager (CAI)

Total radiative heating/cooling rates.

Evaluating the Impact of Cloud-Aerosol- Precipitation Interaction (CAPI) Schemes on Rainfall Forecast in the NGGPS

Evaluating GCM clouds using instrument simulators

A SURVEY OF CLOUD COVER OVER MĂGURELE, ROMANIA, USING CEILOMETER AND SATELLITE DATA

Climatology of aerosol and cloud properties at the ARM sites:

Fundamentals of Climate Change (PCC 587): Water Vapor

Fog and low cloud ceilings in the northeastern US: climatology and dedicated field study

Evaluation of the Effect of Upper-Level Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Retrievals of Low-Level Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

RADIATION IN THE TROPICAL ATMOSPHERE and the SAHEL SURFACE HEAT BALANCE. Peter J. Lamb. Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies

Evalua&ng Downdra/ Parameteriza&ons with High Resolu&on CRM Data

Observed Cloud Cover Trends and Global Climate Change. Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography

NOAA flight planning support and satellite aerosol and cloud retrieval validation during TORERO

The relationship between biomass burning aerosols, cloud condensation nuclei and cloud stucture in Amazonia

II. Related Activities

Analysis of Cloud Variability and Sampling Errors in Surface and Satellite Measurements

Saharan Dust Aerosols Detection Over the Region of Puerto Rico

The Effect of Droplet Size Distribution on the Determination of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

Impact of microphysics on cloud-system resolving model simulations of deep convection and SpCAM

Convective Clouds. Convective clouds 1

Cloud detection and clearing for the MOPITT instrument

T.A. Tarasova, and C.A.Nobre

The Surface Energy Budget

CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES, and MODIS Merged Data Product

GOES-R AWG Cloud Team: ABI Cloud Height

Climatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula

The Balance of Power in the Earth-Sun System

Energy Pathways in Earth s Atmosphere

Radiative effects of clouds, ice sheet and sea ice in the Antarctic

California Standards Grades 9 12 Boardworks 2009 Science Contents Standards Mapping

Microwave observations in the presence of cloud and precipitation

MSG-SEVIRI cloud physical properties for model evaluations

Denis Botambekov 1, Andrew Heidinger 2, Andi Walther 1, and Nick Bearson 1

What the Heck are Low-Cloud Feedbacks? Takanobu Yamaguchi Rachel R. McCrary Anna B. Harper

Satellite Products and Dissemination: Visualization and Data Access

STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Beta Review. Suomi NPP Surface Reflectance IP ARP Product

Solar Flux and Flux Density. Lecture 3: Global Energy Cycle. Solar Energy Incident On the Earth. Solar Flux Density Reaching Earth

Towards an NWP-testbed

Update on EUMETSAT ocean colour services. Ewa J. Kwiatkowska

A new positive cloud feedback?

A review of cloud top height and optical depth histograms from MISR, ISCCP, and MODIS

REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUD-AEROSOL RADIATIVE EFFECTS FROM SATELLITE DATA: A CASE STUDY OVER THE SOUTH OF PORTUGAL

Guy Carpenter Asia-Pacific Climate Impact Centre, School of energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong

Ecosystem-land-surface-BL-cloud coupling as climate changes

An Introduction to Twomey Effect

The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis. CCCma AGCM4

Earth Sciences -- Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12. California State Science Content Standards. Mobile Climate Science Labs

Continental and Marine Low-level Cloud Processes and Properties (ARM SGP and AZORES) Xiquan Dong University of North Dakota

Multiplatform analysis of the radiative effects and heating rates for an intense dust storm on 21 June 2007

SATELLITE IMAGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA PROCESSING

Passive Remote Sensing of Clouds from Airborne Platforms

Satellite'&'NASA'Data'Intro'

Comparison of Cloud and Radiation Variability Reported by Surface Observers, ISCCP, and ERBS

Integrated Global Carbon Observations. Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University

Long term cloud cover trends over the U.S. from ground based data and satellite products

Amy K. Huff Battelle Memorial Institute BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1

Sensitivity of Surface Cloud Radiative Forcing to Arctic Cloud Properties

Comparison of the Vertical Velocity used to Calculate the Cloud Droplet Number Concentration in a Cloud-Resolving and a Global Climate Model

Titelmasterformat durch Klicken. bearbeiten

Chapter 6: Cloud Development and Forms

The climate cooling potential of different geoengineering options

Cloud Radiation and the Law of Attraction

Improving Hydrological Predictions

Atmospheric Dynamics of Venus and Earth. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics UCLA 2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Estimating Firn Emissivity, from 1994 to1998, at the Ski Hi Automatic Weather Station on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Using Passive Microwave Data

GCMs with Implicit and Explicit cloudrain processes for simulation of extreme precipitation frequency

Overview of the IR channels and their applications

Development of an Integrated Data Product for Hawaii Climate

Stability and Cloud Development. Stability in the atmosphere AT350. Why did this cloud form, whereas the sky was clear 4 hours ago?

Physical properties of mesoscale high-level cloud systems in relation to their atmospheric environment deduced from Sounders

1D shallow convective case studies and comparisons with LES

Radiation models for the evaluation of the UV radiation at the ground

Satellite Remote Sensing of Volcanic Ash

Ocean Level-3 Standard Mapped Image Products June 4, 2010

8.5 Comparing Canadian Climates (Lab)

CERES Edition 2 & Edition 3 Cloud Cover, Cloud Altitude and Temperature

DUST DETECTION ALGORITHM USING MODIS DATA AND HYDRA SOFTWARE

Transcription:

Arlindo da Silva Arlindo.dasilva@nasa.gov Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA/GSFC With contributions from Peter Colarco, Anton Darmenov, Virginie Buchard, Gala Wind, Cynthia Randles, Ravi Govindaradju and many others NOAA Climate Reanalysis Task Force Workshop College Park, Maryland 4-5 May 2015

Global Aerosols 7 km GEOS-5 Nature Run Global Mesoscale Simulation 3 Aerosols play an important role in both weather and climate. They are transported around the globe far from their source regions, interacting with weather systems, scattering and absorbing solar and terrestrial radiation, and modifying cloud micro- and macro-physical properties. They are recognized as one of the most important forcing agents in the climate system.

Name Nominal Resolution Period Aerosol Data MERRA-1 50 km 1979-present NONE now MERRAero 50 km 2002-present MODIS C5 now FP for Inst. Teams Available 50 km 1997- MODIS C5 In progress NCA 25 km 2010-11 MODIS C5, MISR Now MERRA-2 50 km 1979-present AVHRR, MODIS C5, MISR,AERONET MERRA-2 Dynamical Downscaling 12.5 km 2000-2015 AVHRR, MODIS C5/C6, MISR, AERONET Summer 2015 Q4 2015 4

Global, 50 km, 72 Levels, top at 0.01 hpa 5

Biomass Burning QFED: Quick Fire Emission Dataset Top-down algorithm based on MODIS Fire Radiative Power (AQUA/TERRA) FRP Emission factors tuned by means of inverse calculation based on MODIS AOD data. Daily mean emissions, NRT Prescribed diurnal cycle In GEOS-5 BB emissios are deposited in the PBL.

Forecasting Reanalysis only Aerosol Data Assimilation in GEOS-5

Model Feature Aerosol Data Assimilation Period Resolution Aerosol Species Description GEOS-5 Earth Modeling System (w/ GOCART) Constrained by MERRA-1 Meteorology (Replay) Land sees obs. precipitation (like MERRALand) Driven by QFED daily Biomass Emissions Version 2.2 Local Displacement Ensembles (LDE) Neural Net MODIS Aerosol Optical Depth Retrievals Trained on AERONET Level 2 AOD s Stringent cloud screening mid 2002-present (Aqua + Terra) Horizontal: nominally 50 km Vertical: 72 layers, top ~85 km Dust, sea-salt, sulfates, organic & black carbon 8

AERONET-MODIS/MISR Joint PDF MODIS-Terra (Ocean) MISR (Ocean+Land) Observation bias correction is necessary.

NRL Empirical AOD Corrections

Neural Net for AOD Empirical Retrievals Ocean Predictors Multi-channel TOA Reflectances Retrieved AOD Angles Glint Solar Sensor Cloud fraction (<85%) Wind speed Target: AERONET Log(AOD+0.01) Land Predictors Multi-channel TOA Reflectances Retrieved AOD Angles Solar Sensor Cloud fraction (<85%) Climatological albedo < 0.25 Target: AERONET Log(AOD+0.01)

ORIGINAL MODIS AOD BIAS CORRECTED AOD

Analysis Splitting

Construct perturbation ensembles by means of isotropic displacements around gridbox Weigh each ensemble member by its fit to 2D AOD analysis For efficiency, perform the AOD-to-mixing ratio calculation in 1D First Guess Truth Truth

h = log(t + 0.01) 16

DUST

MERRAero Aerosol Reanalysis MERRAero provides observation constrained estimate of aerosol radiative forcing, which can be analyzed by component

20

21

Model Emissions Feature Aerosol Data Assimilation Period Resolution Aerosol Species Description GEOS-5 Earth Modeling System (w/ GOCART) Interactive aerosols with AOD data assimilation Land sees obs. precipitation (like MERRALand) Daily QFED for 2000-on, monthly calibrated RETRO before Local Displacement Ensembles (LDE) Neural Net MODIS Aerosol Optical Depth Retrievals v2 MISR AOD data over bright surfaces AVHRR Neural Net Retrieval Stringent cloud screening 1980-present Horizontal: nominally 50 km Vertical: 72 layers, top ~85 km Dust, sea-salt, sulfates, organic & black carbon 22

AVHRR NOAA CDR AOD MERRAero, AERONET Comparison 630 nm 630 nm MERRAero AERONET 23

CDR: 2008 Dust Carbonaceous Multiple Species Sea-salt Sulfate 24

PATMOS-x AVHRR Pathfinder Atmospheres - Extended PATMOS-x Dataset Version 5 Level 2B 0.1 degree sampling (not average) Period: 1978-2009 Inter satellite calibration (MODIS reference) Bayesian probabilistic cloud detection (CALIPSO reference) cpd <0.5% Neural Net Retrival Ocean Predictors TOA Reflectances 630 and 860 nm TPW Ocean albedo (wind) Solar and sensor angles GEOS-5 fractional AOD speciation Target: AOD at 550 nm Balanced MODIS NNR 25

2008 Multiple Species 26

27

Global, 12.5 km, 72 Levels, top at 0.01 hpa 29

Aerosols are an integral part of the GEOS-5 N.R.T. and re-analysis systems MERRA-2 provides the first integrated aerosol-meteorology reanalysis for the satellite era Current GEOS-5 developments incorporate cloud and aerosol microphysics Aerosol-cloud interactions, missing species Aerosol assimilation migrating to EnKF

Animation by C. A. Randles Aerosol Direct effect Mostly Scattering Aerosol Solar Radiation Scattered to Space Solar Radiation Scattered to Space Mostly Absorbing Aerosol Solar Radiation Absorbed by Aerosol Layer Atmospheric Radiative Warming Less Solar Radiation Reaches Surface Surface Radiative Cooling Less Solar Radiation Reaches Surface Surface Radiative Cooling (e.g. sulfate, sea salt aerosols) (e.g. black carbon, dust aerosols)

Aerosol INDirect effect Larger cloud droplets, less reflective cloud. arger cloud droplets, droplets rain out easier, clouds dissipate quicker. graphic courtesy NASA Earth Observatory Twomey Effect graphic courtesy NASA Earth Observatory Less Aerosols Increased Cooling by Clouds Albrecht Effect Smaller cloud droplets, more reflective cloud. More Aerosols Smaller cloud droplets, droplets rain out less, longer-lived clouds. Animation by C. A. Randles

Absorption-CIRCULATION INTERACTIONS source decreased upperlevel clouds ZONAL CIRCULATION subsidence & suppressed convection Elevated Heat Pump increased convection & upper-level clouds RADIATIVE HEATING RADIATIVE HEATING increased low-level clouds N increased moisture transport REDUCED SW FLUX COOLER OCEAN SURFACE increased rainfall increased low-level stability Animation: C. A. Randles adapted from Lau et. al. [2009; Fig 10] REDUCE D SW FLUX COOLER LAND SURFACE LAND OCEAN Widespread absorbing aerosol layers can impact large-scale circulation and precipitation patterns like the Indian Monsoon (e.g. Ramanathan and Carmichael, Nature, 2008).

2D DATASETS Hourly, 3-hourly Speciated AOT, AAOT, PM2.5, PM10 12 wavelengths 340, 380, 440, 470, 500, 550, 670, 865, 1024, 1240, 1640, 2130 Surface & column mass Sources & sinks Non-speciated Aerosol radiative forcing UV aerosol Index 3D DATASETS 3-hourly Speciated: Aerosol mixing ratio Non-speciated 355nm, 532nm, 1024nm Aerosol Extinction Single Scattering Albedo Asymmetry parameter Backscatter Attenuated Backscatter (TOA & SFC) ftp://iesa@ftp.nccs.nasa.gov/pub/merraero 35

Focus on NASA EOS instruments, MODIS for now Global, high resolution 2D AOD analysis 3D increments by means of Local Displacement Ensembles (LDE) Simultaneous estimates of background bias (Dee and da Silva 1998) Adaptive Statistical Quality Control (Dee et al. 1999): State dependent (adapts to the error of the day) Background and Buddy checks based on logtransformed AOD innovation Error covariance models (Dee and da Silva 1999): Innovation based Maximum likelihood 36

Data Type Quality control and Data Assimilation methodologies assumes Gaussian statistics AOD (and errors) is not normally distributed Log-transformed AOD has better statistical properties: Log ( 0.01 + AOD) This 0.01 factor is determined from goodnessof-fit considerations

Analysis Variable: h = log(t + 0.01) AOD LAOD AOD O-F LAOD O-F MODIS/TERRA Ocean

Smirnov et al. (2011) 39

Dust Sea-salt Sulfate OC+BC Speciation potentially adjusted by spectral reflectances 40

41

DUST SULFATES OC+BC

AVHRR NOAA CDR AOD AERONET Comparison ORIGINAL CDR AOD Bias Corrected AOD 630 nm 550 nm Coastal and Island Stations for 2003-2009 43

GEOS-5 SEAC 4 RS Mini-Reanalysis Feature Model Fire Emissions Met. Data Assimilation Aerosol Data Assimilation Aerosol Observing System GEOS-5 Biomass Burning OC AOT GEOS-5 Biomass Burning CO from N. America Description GEOS-5 Earth Modeling System with GOCART aerosols coupled to radiation parameterization QFED: Daily, NRT, MODIS FRP based Full NWP observing system (uses GSI) Assimilates 550 nm AOT, Local Displacement Ensembles (LDE), Adaptive Buddy Check MODIS: Aqua & Terra Neural Net Retrievals (NNR) MISR: Bright surfaces only (albedo > 15%) AERONET: Level 2 Resolution Aerosol Species Carbon Species Smoke Age Tracers ~25 km (0.5 0.625 latitude longitude), 72 layers, top ~85 km Dust (DU), sea-salt (SS), sulfates (SO4), organic and black carbon (OC and BC) CO2, CO with several geographically tagged tracers Provides age of un-assimilated biomass burning OC AOT with 1 day time resolution (smoke age histogram)

Vertical Distribution: DIAL/HSRL 532 nm Backscatter CO-WY DIAL/HSRL DIAL/HSRL GEOS-5 GEOS-5

Solid Line = Median Shaded = 25-75% Aerosol Backscatter Aerosol Extinction R. Ferrare

In-Situ Aerosol Optics: LARGE (450-470 nm) Dry PDFs b scat = b ext b abs R 2 = 0.67 Characteristic Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 1: G5 9% > L Mode 2: L 44% > G5 OC/BC Carbonaceous Mass 79% OC 21% BC 93% OC 7% BC % Total Mass BC 0.04 0.02 b abs = b ext b scat R 2 = 0.44 BC Hygroscopicity 17% Hydrophobic 83% Hydrophilic 35% Hydrophobic 65% Hydrophilic Mode 1: G5 30% > L Mode 2: G5 60% > L Smoke 0-2 d 0.09 0.29 Smole 6-7+ d 0.69 0.35 SSA organic OC SSA(ƛ) Carbon 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Mode 1: 0.0 L- G5 = 0.06 0.4 0.69 1 l [mm] 1.00 1.0! = b scat b0.8 ext 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 SSA 1.00 BC black SSA(ƛ) Carbon R 2 = 0.01 0% RH 30% RH 80% RH 95% RH Mode 2: L - G5 = 0.06 0.4 0.69 1 l [mm] Mode 1 Mode 2 Less Absorption More Absorption Lower SSA Higher SSA More BC Less BC More Hydrophilic More Hydrophobic Old Young

Aerosol Observing System Statistics Observing System GEOS-5 AOT Statistics (130 W-60 W, 24 N-55 N) R 2 1000 stderr Bias (Obs-GEOS5) Before Assimilation (3-hour Forecast) R 2 = 0.79 AERONET N = 102,552 MISR N = 494,743 MODIS Terra N = 24,504,880 MODIS Aqua N = 23,300,505 Background 0.79 1.25-0.06 Analysis 0.9 0.92-0.02 Background 0.66 0.9 0.06 Analysis 0.83 0.58 0.02 Background 0.72 0.1-0.12 Analysis 0.92 0.05-0.01 Background 0.74 0.1-0.08 Analysis 0.93 0.05 0 Effect of observing system on the 3-hr forecast skill (N.B.: 3-hr forecast informed by previous assimilation step) After assimilation, comparison is not 1- to-1 because of impact of other sensors. GEOS-5 AOT (550 nm) AERONET AOT (550 nm) After Assimilation R 2 = 0.90 GEOS-5 AOT (550 nm) f a AERONET AOT (550 nm)

In-Situ Aerosol Optics: LARGE (550 nm) and f(rh) PDFs DRY AEROSOL WET AEROSOL b scat = b ext b abs R 2 = 0.66 b scat = b ext b abs R 2 = 0.38 Mode 1: R 2 = 0.18 L 13% > G5 Mode 2: R 2 = 0.18 L 40% > G5 Mode 1: R 2 = 0.01 L 20% > G5 Mode 2: R 2 = 0.19 G5 5% > L Mode 1: R 2 = 0.11 L - G5 = 0.08! = b scat b ext Mode 2: R 2 = 0.01 L - G5 = 0.06 R 2 = 0.00 Mode 1: R 2 = 0.01 L - G5 = 0.01! = b scat b ext Mode 2: R 2 = 0.00 L - G5 = 0.02 R 2 = 0.00 Mode 1: R 2 = 0.03 G5 63% > L Fresh Smoke Ag Fires/Background Mode 2: R 2 = 0.15 G5 62% > L R 2 = 0.13 b ext [m 2 g -1 ] b ext [m 2 g -1 ] hydrophilic sulfate 50 40 f (RH)=2.46 SO4 GEOS-5 f(rh) 30 20 20-80% RH 10 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 hydrophilic black carbon hydrophilic organic RH carbon 50 50 40 f (RH)=1.45 40 BC f (RH)=1.95 OC 30 100.00 30 20 10.00 20 10 1.00 10 0 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.100.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 RH 0.01 RH 1 10 b ext [m 2 g -1 ] b ext [m 2 g -1 ]