ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT



Similar documents
Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

Waldo Canyon Fire. Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

Roaring Fork Valley Restoration Strategy

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

May 9, Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Power Fire Restoration Project (CEQ# )

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

NPS Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) and Burned Area Rehabilitation (BAR) in the Southern California Landscape

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery NACo Justice & Public Safety Symposium January 2014

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

Restoring Conservancy Lands Following the Angora Fire a Preliminary Assessment

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

Potential Economic Benefits to Santa Ana River Watershed of Forest Restoration. Barbara Wyse, Senior Economist

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

EFB / Online Wetland Restoration Techniques Class Syllabus

Integrating Landscape Restoration and CWPP

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Hawlings River Watershed Restoration Action Plan December 2003

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

How To Assess An Area For Erosion

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Multi-purpose Drainage Management (MDM) Plans

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

Untreated (left) and treated (right) Sierra Nevada forests in Amador County, CA. Photos: Sierra Nevada Conservancy

Increasing water availability through juniper control.

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Flood Mitigation Efforts April Fall 2013

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

RESTORING streams to reduce flood loss

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

Experience Summary. KINA MURPHY, M.S. Ecologist / Community Planner 9 Stone Ridge Road, Santa Fe, NM Cell: Education / Training

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

Restoring and Managing Riparian Areas

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

Plumas Watershed Forum. Review of Ongoing Projects. Updated 10/1/008

Updates: LUR Rulemaking & FEMA Flood Mapping. Vince Mazzei, PE

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

SCHNEIDER CREEK REMEDIATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM

LOS ANGELES COUNTY S FLOODING HISTORY:

Stormwater Wetland Design and Construction Mitigation Duke Bitsko. Construction Activities, Schedule and Sequence Tom Ritchie

The Eight Tools of Watershed Protection. Tom Schueler Center for Watershed Protection EPA Webcast

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Plan

Transcription:

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT U.S. Forest Service LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Duncan Leao Vegetation Management Planner Richard Vacirca Forest Aquatics Biologist

3 PHASES OF FIRE REHAB Phase I Rehab: Immediate post-fire actions Termed mop-up Hand/dozer lines, roads, safety zones, portions of urban lots Phase II Rehab: Burned Area Emergency Rehab (BAER) Erosion control measures Fall/Winter storm events Noxious weed detection surveys Phase III Rehab: Public safety & Long-term restoration Angora Hazard Tree Removal Project (urban lots/roads/trails) Angora Fire Restoration Project

WHY HERE? WHY NOW? CONSIDERATIONS: Pre-fire + post-fire conditions influence whether or not we are currently at or will eventually meet desired conditions WITHOUT active management. Impacts prior to the fire - Roads/trails in SEZs; ; Stream straightening; Fire suppression affecting fuel loading Impacts post-fire - Loss of vegetation/ground cover to conserve soils - Further effects to resources from future fire and/or floods + Increase in water availability + Increase in riparian vegetation

DESIRED CONDITIONS - EXAMPLES POST-FIRE (> 20 YEARS) Fire, Fuels, Vegetation and Forest Management Stand conditions in the defense zone are fairly open dominated by large, fire tolerant trees with an overall average fuel loading of < 15 tons/acre. Wildlife Habitat Maintain sufficient levels of snags and down logs to provide some characteristics of diverse forest habitat. Watershed and Aquatic The connections of floodplains, channels, and water tables distribute flood flows and sustain diverse habitats. Roads and Trails The transportation system will provide non-motorized public access to the National Forest. Roads and trails retained in the system will be improved to meet Forest Service standards necessary for water quality protection.

PROPOSED ACTIONS VEGETATION/FUELS

PROPOSED ACTIONS ASPEN

PROPOSED ACTIONS WATERSHED/AQUATICS

PROPOSED ACTIONS ROADS/TRAILS

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTIONS FUELS/FOREST HEALTH Ground based removal = up to 951 acres Aerial removal = up to 447 acres Reforestation = up to 1,100 acres WILDLIFE HABITAT Wildlife Habitat Management Zones project design Aspen (conifer removal) 1 stand/< 5 acres Aspen (planting) 11 plots/1/4 acre WATERSHED AND AQUATIC Channel reconstruction (Angora Creek) - ~1200 feet (0.23 miles) Large wood placement (Angora Creek + Tribs) - ~ 2 miles Gardner Mountain Meadow 13 acres/~1500 feet (est.) Wetland complex (Seneca Pond) 5-10 acres (est.)

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTIONS CONT. ROADS AND TRAILS System roads upgrades = BMPs,, move out of SEZs, decommission, etc. Non-system roads upgrades = decommission, reconstruct + adopt Trails new construction, reroute + BMPs on existing, decommission, way-finding signage NOXIOUS WEEDS Manuel treatment methods (bull thistle) 15 30 acres (est.)