# Notes on Determinant

Save this PDF as:
Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 ENGG2012B Advanced Engineering Mathematics Notes on Determinant Lecturer: Kenneth Shum Lecture 9-18/02/2013 The determinant of a system of linear equations determines whether the solution is unique, without actually calculating the solution. This note is the preliminary to the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. We want to determine whether a system of homogeneous linear equations Ax = 0, where A is an n n matrix, has nontrivial solution or not. It is obvious that x = 0 is a solution. Any solution with at least one component non-zero is said to be non-trivial. Corollary 10 at the end of this note gives a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of non-trivial solution. It is analogous to the discriminant of a quadratic equation ax 2 + bx + c = 0. We can determine whether the roots are distinct or repeated from the discriminant b 2 4ac, without actually calculating the roots. The objectives of this notes are: 1. Define determinant properly. 2. Derive some basic properties of determinant determinant The determinant of 2 2 matrix is defined as [ ] a b det := ad bc. (1) c d (The symbol := means true by definition.) If A is a 2 2 matrix with non-zero determinant, we can solve Ax = b by x = 1 [ ] d b b. det A c a The solution is uniquely determined by the above equation. If det A = 0, then either Ax = b has no solution or infinitely many solutions. To emphasize the dependency on the rows of the matrix, we let u and v be the first and second rows of a 2 2 matrix, respectively, and write the determinant function as det(u, v). With this notation, we can readily check from (1) that the determinant function satisfies the following properties: 1. det(u, v) = det(v, u). 2. det(u 1 + u 2, v) = det(u 1, v) + det(u 2, v). 3. det(u, v 1 + v 2 ) = det(u, v 1 ) + det(u, v 2 ). 4. det(cu, v) = c det(u, v), for any constant c. 5. det(u, cv) = c det(u, v), for any constant c. 1

2 6. det([1 0], [0 1]) = 1. Here, u, u 1, u 2, v, v 1 and v 2 are row vectors of length two, and c is a real constant which may equal zero. We want to generalize the notion of determinant to general n n matrices, so that we can efficiently determine whether an n n linear system has unique solution. 2 How to define n n determinant? There are several approaches in defining determinant beyond the 2 2 case. We shall give two of them below. The first one is recursive, and the second one is not. In the following, the matrix A = [a ij ] is an n n matrix. The (i, j)-entry of A is denoted by a ij. [ ] a b Expansion on the first row. For 2 2 matrices, we define the determinant as ad bc. c d Recursively, suppose that we know how to calculate (n 1) (n 1) determinant for some integer n 3. In order to simplify notations, for positive integers between 1 and n, we let A ij be the determinant of the submatrix obtained by removing the i-th row and the j-th column. The value A ij is called the minor corresponding to the (i, j)-entry of A. In terms of the minors, the determinant of the n n matrix A can be defined by det(a) := a 11 A 11 a 12 A 12 + a 13 A 13 + ( 1) n+1 a 1n A 1n. (2) This definition is usually called the Laplace expansion on the first row. Example: det = = (21) 2(12) + 3( 15) = Definition in terms of permutations There are n! ways to write 1 to n in some order. Each of them is called a permutation of 1, 2,..., n. For example, (2, 5, 1, 4, 3) and (1, 4, 5, 2, 3) are two permutations of 1 to 5. For a sequence of distinct numbers, (a 1, a 2,..., a n ), we define the corresponding inversion number as the number of pairs which are not in the natural order; we count the number of pairs a i and a j such that a i > a j and i < j. Mathematically, we let inv(a 1, a 2,..., a n ) := #{(i, j) : a i > a j and i < j}. The symbol #S stands for the number of elements in a set S. In other words, the inversion number of permutation (p 1, p 2,..., p n ) counts the number of integers r and s such that r is to the left of s and r is larger than s. A permutation is in ascending order if and only if the inversion number is equal to zero. Example: The inversion number of (2, 5, 1, 4, 3) is 5, because we can find five pairs (2, 1), (5, 1), (5, 3), (4, 3) and (5, 4). The inversion number of (1, 4, 5, 2, 3) is 4, because of (4, 2), (5, 2), (4, 3) and (5, 3). Inversion number is defined for any sequence of distinct numbers, not necessarily a permutation of 1 to n. For example, the inversion number of (1, 16, 4, 9) is 2. For an n n matrix A, we can define the determinant of A by det A := ( 1) inv(p 1,p 2,...,p n ) a 1,p1 a 2,p2 a 3,p3 a 4,p4 a n,pn, (3) with the summation over all permutations of 1 to n. There are n! terms, and each term consists of a sign ( 1) inv(p1,p2,...,pn) and the product of n entries in A. This formula is sometime called the Leibniz formula. We note that the determinant only needs the information whether the inversion number is even or odd; if the inversion number is even, then the corresponding term has positive sign, otherwise the sign is negative. 2

3 Example: For n = 4, we check that inv(1, 2, 3, 4) = 0, inv(2, 1, 3, 4) = 1, inv(3, 1, 2, 4) = 2, inv(4, 1, 2, 3) = 3, inv(1, 2, 4, 3) = 1, inv(2, 1, 4, 3) = 2, inv(3, 1, 4, 2) = 3, inv(4, 1, 3, 2) = 4, inv(1, 3, 2, 4) = 1, inv(2, 3, 1, 4) = 2, inv(3, 2, 1, 4) = 3, inv(4, 2, 1, 3) = 4, inv(1, 3, 4, 2) = 2, inv(2, 3, 4, 1) = 3, inv(3, 2, 4, 1) = 4, inv(4, 2, 3, 1) = 5, inv(1, 4, 2, 3) = 2, inv(2, 4, 1, 3) = 3, inv(3, 4, 1, 2) = 4, inv(4, 3, 1, 2) = 5, inv(1, 4, 3, 2) = 3, inv(2, 4, 3, 1) = 4, inv(3, 4, 2, 1) = 5, inv(4, 3, 2, 1) = 6. Using the inversion number of the 24 permutations of 1,2,3,4, we can write the determinant of a 4 4 matrix a 11 a 12 a 13 a 14 A = a 21 a 22 a 23 a 24 a 31 a 32 a 33 a 34 a 41 a 42 a 43 a 44 as det A := a 11 a 22 a 33 a 44 a 12 a 21 a 33 a 44 + a 13 a 21 a 32 a 44 a 14 a 21 a 32 a 43 a 11 a 22 a 34 a 43 + a 12 a 21 a 34 a 43 a 13 a 21 a 34 a 42 + a 14 a 21 a 33 a 42 a 11 a 23 a 32 a 44 + a 12 a 23 a 31 a 44 a 13 a 22 a 31 a 44 + a 14 a 22 a 31 a 43 + a 11 a 23 a 34 a 42 a 12 a 23 a 34 a 41 + a 13 a 22 a 34 a 41 a 14 a 22 a 33 a 41 + a 11 a 24 a 32 a 43 a 12 a 24 a 31 a 43 + a 13 a 24 a 31 a 42 a 14 a 23 a 31 a 42 a 11 a 24 a 33 a 42 + a 12 a 24 a 33 a 41 a 13 a 24 a 32 a 41 + a 14 a 23 a 32 a 41. We note that in each term, the first subscripts are in ascending order, while the second subscripts form a permutation of 1, 2, 3 and 4. There are 24 terms. Half of them have positive sign and half of them have negative sign. Proposition 1. The two definitions given above are equivalent. Proof We want to show that, for any n n matrix, the calculations in the two definitions of determinant give the same result. We proceed by mathematical induction. [ ] a11 a According to the first definition, the determinant 2 2 matrix 12 is a a 21 a 11 a 22 a 12 a 21. It is in 22 accordance with the second definition, because the inversion number of the permutation (1, 2) is 0 and the inversion number of (2, 1) is 1, [ ] a11 a det 12 = ( 1) inv(1,2) a a 21 a 11 a 22 + ( 1) inv(2,1) a 12 a 21 = a 11 a 22 a 12 a Let n be an integer larger than or equal to 3. Suppose that the two definitions of determinant agree with each other for matrices of size (n 1) (n 1). We will use the fact that if (p 1, p 2,..., p n ) is a permutation of 1 to n, then there are exactly p 1 1 pairs of number (p 1, p k ) with p 1 > p k. Therefore, inv(p 1, p 2,..., p n ) = (p 1 1) + inv(p 2, p 3,..., p n ) (4) if (p 1, p 2,..., p n ) is a permutation of 1 to n. In (4), inv(p 2, p 3,..., p n ) is the inversion number of (p 2, p 3,..., p n ), which is a permutation of {1, 2,..., p 1 1, p 1 + 1,..., n}. From the definition in (3), we can group the terms according to p 1, and get det A = ( 1) inv(p 1,p 2,...,p n ) a 1,p1 a 2,p2 a 3,p3 a 4,p4 a n,pn, = n ( 1) p1 1 a 1,p1 p 1=1 (p 2,p 3,...,p n ) ( 1) inv(p2,p3,...,pn) a 2,p2 a 3,p3 a 4,p4 a n,pn. 3

4 By the induction hypothesis, the summation ( 1) inv(p2,p3,...,pn) a 2,p2 a 3,p3 a 4,p4 a n,pn (p 2,p 3,...,p n ) is precisely the minor corresponding to the (1, p 1 )-entry of A. Therefore, det A = which coincides with the first definition in (2). n ( 1) p1 1 A 1,p1, p 1=1 At this point, a computer scientist would say: the computational complexity involved in each of the two definitions given above are so high that they are not suitable for calculating determinant of large size. Indeed, the Leibniz formula has n! terms, and n! increases exponentially with n. If we apply the recursive formula in the straightforward way, the computational complexity is also in the order of n!. For example the calculation of a matrix using the first recursive definition directly requires more than three million multiplications. A more efficient method of calculating the determinant will be given in the next section. 3 Axioms of determinant It turns out that the properties of determinant are more important then how to calculate the determinant. We shall identify several basic and desirable properties of determinant, called axioms, and verify that the two equivalent ways of calculating determinant in the last section satisfy these axioms. We write the desired function on matrices as a function which whose inputs are n row vectors of length n, and the output is a real number, det(v 1, v 2,..., v n ). As in the 2 2 case, we want to construct a function which (at least) satisfies the following properties. (Axiom 1) If any two row vectors in det(v 1, v 2,..., v n ) are exchanged, then the value of the determinant is multiplied by 1. (Axiom 2) det(u + u, v 2,..., v n ) = det(u, v 2,..., v n ) + det(u, v 2,..., v n ) for any two row vectors u and u of length n. (Axiom 3) det(cv 1, v 2,..., v n ) = c det(v 1, v 2,..., v n ) for any constant c. (Axiom 4) For i = 1, 2,..., n, let e i be the standard basis of R n, i.e., Then det(e 1, e 2,..., e n ) = 1. e i := (0, 0,..., 0, 1, 0, 0,..., 0). } {{ } i These four properties are called the axioms of determinant. We first derive some immediate properties from the four axioms. Proposition 2. If det is a function which satisfies Axioms 1 to 4, then 1. If any two row vectors are identical, then det(v 1, v 2,..., v n ) is equal to 0. 4

5 2. Suppose that the i-th row vector can be decomposed as the sum u + u. Then 3. For any constant c, we have det(v 1,..., v i 1, u + u,..., v n ) = det(v 1,..., v i 1, u,..., v n ) + det(v 1,..., v i 1, u,..., v n ). det(v 1,..., v i 1, cv i,..., v n ) = c det(v 1,..., v i 1, v i,..., v n ). 4. For any two distinct row indices i j, adding any constant multiple of the r j to r i does not change the value of determinant. 5. If one of the input row vector is an all-zero vector, then the determinant is equal to zero. Proof (1) Suppose that the i-th row and the j-th row are identical. Let the determinant function value be x. Since the i-th and the j-th row are the same, exchanging them gives the same determinant value x. However, by Axiom 1, if the i-th and the j-th row are exchanged, the value of the resulting determinant is x. Hence, x = x. This is possible only if x = 0. (2) We substitute v i by u + u, det(v 1,..., v i 1, u + u,..., v n ) = det(u + u,..., v i 1, v 1,..., v n ) = det(u,..., v i 1, v 1,..., v n ) det(u,..., v i 1, v 1,..., v n ) = det(v 1,..., v i 1, u,..., v n ) + det(v 1,..., v i 1, u,..., v n ). The first and third equalities follow from Axiom 1, while the second equality follows from Axiom 2. (3) The proof of part 3 is similar to part 2, and is omitted. (4) For any constant c, det(v 1,..., v i + cv j,..., v j..., v n ) = det(v 1,..., v i,..., v j..., v n ) + det(v 1,..., cv j,..., v j..., v n ) = det(v 1,..., v i,..., v j..., v n ) + c det(v 1,..., v j,..., v j..., v n ) = det(v 1,..., v i,..., v j..., v n ). The first and second equalities follows from Axiom 2 and 3, respectively. The last equality follows from the first part of the proposition. (5) Suppose that the components of v i are all zero. Let c be any real number which is not equal to 1. We have cv i = v i = [ ], and by part (3) of the proposition, we get Therefore det(v 1,..., v i 1, v i,..., v n ) = det(v 1,..., v i 1, cv i,..., v n ) This implies that det(v 1,..., v i 1, v i,..., v n ) = 0. = c det(v 1,..., v i 1, v i,..., v n ). (1 c) det(v 1,..., v i 1, v i,..., v n ) = 0. We now verify that the second definition of determinant satisfies the four axioms. Proposition 3. The function defined in (3) satisfies Axioms 1 to 4. 5

6 Proof In order to avoid potential confusion, we let v i = [a i1 a i2... a in ] be row vector of length n, for i = 1, 2,..., n, and let f(v 1, v 2,..., v n ) be a function defined as f(v 1, v 2,..., v n ) := ( 1) inv(p 1,p 2,...,p n ) a 1,p1 a 2,p2 a n,pn, (5) where the summation is over all possible permutations (p 1,..., p n ) of 1 to n. (Verification of Axiom 4) Let v i be the i-th basis vector e i. Then { 1 if i = j, a ij = 0 otherwise. Hence, all terms in (5) are zero except the term corresponding to (p 1, p 2,..., p n ) = (1, 2,..., n). This gives f(e 1, e 2,..., e n ) = inv(1, 2,..., n)a 11 a 22 a nn = = 1. (Verification of Axiom 3) Suppose that the i-th row v i is multiplied by a constant c. We have f(v 1, v 2,..., cv i,..., v n ) = ( 1) inv(p 1,p 2,...,p n ) a 1,p1 a 2,p2 (ca i,pi ) a n,pn, = c ( 1) inv(p1,p2,...,pn) a 1,p1 a 2,p2 a i,pi a n,pn, = cf(v 1, v 2,..., cv i,..., v n ). (Verification of Axiom 2) The verification of Axiom 2 is similar to the verification of Axiom 3, and is omitted. (Verification of Axiom 1) For Axiom 1, we need the property that if we swap two numbers in (p 1, p 2,..., p n ), then the parity of the inversion number changes, i.e., if the inversion number is even before the swapping, then the inversion after the swapping is odd, and vice versa. Suppose that we interchange row i and row j, with i j. To express the idea algebraically, we let v i = [a j1 a j2... a jn ] v j = [a i1 a i2... a in ] p i = p j, and p j = p i. The determinant of the matrix after exchanging rows i and j is f(v 1, v 2,..., v i,..., v j,..., v n ) = ( 1) inv(p 1,p 2,...,p n ) a 1,p1 a 2,p2 a j,pi a i,pj a n,pn = = (p 1,..., p i,..., p j,...,p n) ( 1) inv(p1,p2,...,pn) a 1,p1 a 2,p2 a i,pj a j,pi a n,pn ( 1) ( 1) inv(p 1,..., p i,..., p j,...,p n ) = f(v 1, v 2,..., v i,..., v j,..., v n ). a 1,p1 a 2,p2 a i, pi a j, pj a n,pn 6

7 This completes the proof of the proposition. 4 Calculation of determinant by row reductions We have verified that we can construct a function which satisfies the four axioms of determinant. The next question we want to ask is Can we construct two different functions, both of which satisfy the four axioms of determinant? The answer is no, because the function value is uniquely determined by the four axioms. Given an n n matrix A, we can calculate the determinant of A by row-reducing it to an upper triangular or a lower triangular matrix, and use the property that the determinant of an upper triangular or a lower triangular matrix is equal to the product of the diagonal entries. The effect of elementary row operations on the determinant is summarized in the following table. Elementary row operation Effect on determinant Exchange two rows Multiply by 1 Multiply a row by a non-zero constant c Multiply by c Add a constant multiple of a row to another row No change Example: Find the determinant of A = We first exchange row 1 and row 3, in order to make the top-left corner equal to 1, det(a) = det The value is multiplied by 1, because of Axiom 1. After subtracting two times row 1 from row 3, and subtracting two times row 1 from row 4, we get det(a) = det The value does not change after these two row operations. Now, we add four times row 2 to row 3, and 2 times row 2 to row 4, det(a) = det The matrix on the right-hand side is upper triangular. The entries above the diagonal becomes zero after a few more row reductions of the third type, det(a) = det

8 We can pull out the two factor of 5 from the determinant by Axiom 3, and obtain det(a) = 5 5 det = The last equality follows from Axiom 4. Example: Find the determinant of B = by row reduction. After subtracting row 1 and row 2 from row 3, we obtain As the last row is all-zero, the determinant is zero by part (5) of Proposition 2, det B = det = We note that the calculations in these two examples only depend on the properties of determinant. In general, we have the following Proposition 4. There is one and only one function which satisfies the four axioms of determinant. From now on, any function which satisfies the four axioms is called the determinant function. 5 Using determinant to test linear independence Given a set of n vectors of length n, we can test whether they are linearly independent by putting these n vectors together to form an n n matrix, and calculating the determinant. If the determinant is non-zero, then the n vectors are linearly independent, otherwise they are linearly dependent. Proposition 5. Let u 1, u 2,..., u n be column vectors of length n, and let M be the n n matrix whose columns are precisely u 1, u 2,..., u n. We have det M = 0 if and only if u 1, u 2,..., u n are linearly dependent. Proof Let c 1, c 2,..., c n be real numbers such that c 1 u 1 + c 2 u c n u n = 0. The real numbers c 1, c 2,..., c n are solution to c 1 0 c 2.. M = 0.. (6) 0 c n 8

9 We want to test whether we can find a non-trivial solution to (6). We row-reduce the matrix M to reduced row echelon form (RREF). Recall that whether the determinant of M is zero or not is invariant under elementary row operations. Therefore, the determinant of M is non-zero if and only if the determinant of the RREF is nonzero. We count the number of pivots in the RREF and consider two cases: (i) there are exactly n pivots in the RREF, (ii) there are strictly less than n pivots in the RREF. We we call that in RREF, each row contains at most one pivot, and each column contains at most one pivot. Case 1, there are exactly n pivots: Since each pivot occupies one row and one column, there is exactly one pivot in each row and each column. The RREF of M is the n n identity matrix, which has determinant equal to 1 by Axiom 4. Hence det(m) 0 in this case. Since M can be row-reduced to the identity matrix, the only choice for c 1 to c n is c 1 = c 2 = = c n = 0. Therefore u 1, u 2,..., u n are linearly independent. Case 2, there are strictly less than n pivots: The last row of the RREF of M is an all-zero row. The determinant of the RREF is zero by part (5) of Proposition 2. By part (5) of Proposition 2, det(m) = 0 in this case. Since the last row is zero, the number of variables, n, is strictly larger than the number of essentially different equations. We can find (infinitely many) non-trivial solution to the system of linear equations in (6). This implies that u 1, u 2,..., u n are linearly dependent. Example: We want to test whether the following four vectors are linearly independent, , 1 2, 2 2, Concatenate the four vectors and form the matrix We have already calculated that the determinant of this matrix is 25, which is non-zero. Therefore, these four vectors are linearly independent. 6 Computing determinant by column expansion We used several times the property that if a matrix contains an all-zero row, then the determinant is zero. Similar thing are true for columns. Proposition 6. If a matrix contains an all-zero column, then the determinant of this matrix is zero. Proof Let the columns of the matrix be denoted by u 1, u 2,..., u n. Suppose that the j-th column, u j, is the zero vector. Then, columns vectors u 1, u 2,..., u n are linearly dependent, because the linear combination c 1 u 1 + c 2 u c j u j c n u n is equal to the zero vector by setting c j = 1 and the rest of the coefficients to be zero. From Proposition 5, we conclude that the determinant of the matrix is zero. 9

10 We can now show that the determinant can be calculated by Laplace expansion on the first column. Consider the 4 4 case as an example: a e The first row can be decomposed as a sum of two vectors [a ] = [a 0 0 0] + []. By the second axiom of determinant, we get a a e = e + e By Laplace expansion on the first row, the first determinant on the right hand side can be simplified to a 3 3 determinant, a e = a v w x + e Repeat the same procedure to the second row of e, we obtain a e = a v w x + e e = a v w x + 0 = a v w x e v w x + 0. We have used the property that the determinant is multiplied by 1 after exchanging two rows. Apply the 10

11 same steps to rows 3 and 4, we get a v w x e v w x + q v w x = a v w x e v w x + q v w x u v w x = a v w x e v w x + q v w x u. In the last step, we have used the property that if there is a zero column vector in a matrix, then the determinant is zero. In general, we have the following Proposition 7. Let A be an n n matrix and A ij be the determinant of the submatrix obtained by deleting row i and column j. The determinant of A can be computed by expansion on the first column, Example: det A = a 11 A 11 a 21 A 21 + a 31 A ( 1) n+1 a n1 A n1. det = = 2(8) + (13) = Duality between rows and columns Proposition 8. Let T denote the transpose operator. We have for square matrix A. Proof det(a T ) = det(a) We can proceed by mathematical induction. The statement is true for 2 2 matrix, [ ] [ ] a b a c det = ad bc = det. c d b d Suppose that det(b T ) = det(b) for all (n 1) (n 1) matrices B. Let A be an n n matrix, and let A ij be the minor corresponding to the (i, j)-entry. We let a ij = a ji be the (i, j)-entry of matrix A T, and A ij be the minor corresponding to the (i, j)-entry of AT. By the induction hypothesis, we have A ij = A ji. We calculate the determinant of A by expanding on the first column, det A T = a 11A 11 a 21A 21 + a 31A ( 1) n+1 a n1a n1 = a 11 A 11 a 12 A 12 + a 13 A ( 1) n+1 a 1n A 1n. The last line is precisely the Laplace expansion of det(a) on the first row. Therefore det A T = det A. Using Proposition 8, every row property of determinant can be translated to a column property. For example, if we exchange two columns of a matrix, the determinant is multiplied by 1. If we add a scalar multiple of a column to another column, the determinant does not change. Combining Propositions 5 and 8, we obtain the following important theorem 11

12 Theorem 9. For an n n matrix A, the followings are equivalent: 1. the columns of A are linearly independent. 2. det(a) det(a T ) the rows of A are linearly independent. ( Equivalence means that if one statement is true, then all the other statements are also true, but if one statement is false, then all the other statements are also false.) Proof The equivalence between (1) and (2) is precisely the content of Proposition 5. The equivalence between (2) and (3) follows directly from Proposition 8. The equivalence between (3) and (4) follows from the dual of Proposition 5, by replacing all columns by rows, and by A by A T. The following corollary is an immediate consequence of Theorem 9. Corollary 10. Let A be an n n matrix. The system of linear equation has a non-trivial solution if and only if det(a) = 0. Example Consider the system of linear equations Ax = 0 x + y + z = 0 sx 2y z = 0 x y + 2z = 0 where s is a parameter. We want to find the value of s so that we can find a non-trivial solution to the above linear system. By Corollary 10, we solve det s 2 1 = for the parameter s. The above determinant is equal to det s 2 1 = det s [ 2 1 = 1 det 2 1 = 4 3s. ] s det [ 1 ] The first equality follows by subtracting row 1 from row 3, and the second by expansion on the first column. By setting the determinant to zero, we see that the system of linear equations has non-trivial solution if and only if s = 4/3. Indeed, x = 2427, y = 809, z = 1618 is a non-trivial solution when s = 4/3. When s 4/3, the only solution is x = y = z = 0. 12

### MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS 1. SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES 1.1. Representation of a linear system. The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 +

### MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS Systems of Equations and Matrices Representation of a linear system The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a x + a 2 x 2 + + a n x n b a

### MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0-534-40596-7. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column

### Systems of Linear Equations

Systems of Linear Equations Beifang Chen Systems of linear equations Linear systems A linear equation in variables x, x,, x n is an equation of the form a x + a x + + a n x n = b, where a, a,, a n and

### The Determinant: a Means to Calculate Volume

The Determinant: a Means to Calculate Volume Bo Peng August 20, 2007 Abstract This paper gives a definition of the determinant and lists many of its well-known properties Volumes of parallelepipeds are

### Math 115A HW4 Solutions University of California, Los Angeles. 5 2i 6 + 4i. (5 2i)7i (6 + 4i)( 3 + i) = 35i + 14 ( 22 6i) = 36 + 41i.

Math 5A HW4 Solutions September 5, 202 University of California, Los Angeles Problem 4..3b Calculate the determinant, 5 2i 6 + 4i 3 + i 7i Solution: The textbook s instructions give us, (5 2i)7i (6 + 4i)(

### Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction

### 1 Sets and Set Notation.

LINEAR ALGEBRA MATH 27.6 SPRING 23 (COHEN) LECTURE NOTES Sets and Set Notation. Definition (Naive Definition of a Set). A set is any collection of objects, called the elements of that set. We will most

### The Characteristic Polynomial

Physics 116A Winter 2011 The Characteristic Polynomial 1 Coefficients of the characteristic polynomial Consider the eigenvalue problem for an n n matrix A, A v = λ v, v 0 (1) The solution to this problem

### Solving Linear Systems, Continued and The Inverse of a Matrix

, Continued and The of a Matrix Calculus III Summer 2013, Session II Monday, July 15, 2013 Agenda 1. The rank of a matrix 2. The inverse of a square matrix Gaussian Gaussian solves a linear system by reducing

### 8 Square matrices continued: Determinants

8 Square matrices continued: Determinants 8. Introduction Determinants give us important information about square matrices, and, as we ll soon see, are essential for the computation of eigenvalues. You

### University of Lille I PC first year list of exercises n 7. Review

University of Lille I PC first year list of exercises n 7 Review Exercise Solve the following systems in 4 different ways (by substitution, by the Gauss method, by inverting the matrix of coefficients

### Solution of Linear Systems

Chapter 3 Solution of Linear Systems In this chapter we study algorithms for possibly the most commonly occurring problem in scientific computing, the solution of linear systems of equations. We start

### Au = = = 3u. Aw = = = 2w. so the action of A on u and w is very easy to picture: it simply amounts to a stretching by 3 and 2, respectively.

Chapter 7 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors In this last chapter of our exploration of Linear Algebra we will revisit eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices, concepts that were already introduced in Geometry

### Unit 18 Determinants

Unit 18 Determinants Every square matrix has a number associated with it, called its determinant. In this section, we determine how to calculate this number, and also look at some of the properties of

### Similarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices

MATH022 Linear Algebra Brief lecture notes 48 Similarity and Diagonalization Similar Matrices Let A and B be n n matrices. We say that A is similar to B if there is an invertible n n matrix P such that

### Solving Systems of Linear Equations

LECTURE 5 Solving Systems of Linear Equations Recall that we introduced the notion of matrices as a way of standardizing the expression of systems of linear equations In today s lecture I shall show how

### a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + + a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x 2 + + a 2n x n = b 2.

Chapter 1 LINEAR EQUATIONS 1.1 Introduction to linear equations A linear equation in n unknowns x 1, x,, x n is an equation of the form a 1 x 1 + a x + + a n x n = b, where a 1, a,..., a n, b are given

### by the matrix A results in a vector which is a reflection of the given

Eigenvalues & Eigenvectors Example Suppose Then So, geometrically, multiplying a vector in by the matrix A results in a vector which is a reflection of the given vector about the y-axis We observe that

### Solutions to Math 51 First Exam January 29, 2015

Solutions to Math 5 First Exam January 29, 25. ( points) (a) Complete the following sentence: A set of vectors {v,..., v k } is defined to be linearly dependent if (2 points) there exist c,... c k R, not

### MAT 200, Midterm Exam Solution. a. (5 points) Compute the determinant of the matrix A =

MAT 200, Midterm Exam Solution. (0 points total) a. (5 points) Compute the determinant of the matrix 2 2 0 A = 0 3 0 3 0 Answer: det A = 3. The most efficient way is to develop the determinant along the

### Chapter 17. Orthogonal Matrices and Symmetries of Space

Chapter 17. Orthogonal Matrices and Symmetries of Space Take a random matrix, say 1 3 A = 4 5 6, 7 8 9 and compare the lengths of e 1 and Ae 1. The vector e 1 has length 1, while Ae 1 = (1, 4, 7) has length

### Introduction to Matrix Algebra

Psychology 7291: Multivariate Statistics (Carey) 8/27/98 Matrix Algebra - 1 Introduction to Matrix Algebra Definitions: A matrix is a collection of numbers ordered by rows and columns. It is customary

### Matrix Algebra. Some Basic Matrix Laws. Before reading the text or the following notes glance at the following list of basic matrix algebra laws.

Matrix Algebra A. Doerr Before reading the text or the following notes glance at the following list of basic matrix algebra laws. Some Basic Matrix Laws Assume the orders of the matrices are such that

### MATH 551 - APPLIED MATRIX THEORY

MATH 55 - APPLIED MATRIX THEORY FINAL TEST: SAMPLE with SOLUTIONS (25 points NAME: PROBLEM (3 points A web of 5 pages is described by a directed graph whose matrix is given by A Do the following ( points

### Lecture 3: Finding integer solutions to systems of linear equations

Lecture 3: Finding integer solutions to systems of linear equations Algorithmic Number Theory (Fall 2014) Rutgers University Swastik Kopparty Scribe: Abhishek Bhrushundi 1 Overview The goal of this lecture

### Factorization Theorems

Chapter 7 Factorization Theorems This chapter highlights a few of the many factorization theorems for matrices While some factorization results are relatively direct, others are iterative While some factorization

### MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 38: Generalized eigenvectors. Jordan canonical form (continued).

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 38: Generalized eigenvectors Jordan canonical form (continued) Jordan canonical form A Jordan block is a square matrix of the form λ 1 0 0 0 0 λ 1 0 0 0 0 λ 0 0 J = 0

### Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus

Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus n-dimensional Euclidean Space and Matrices Definition of n space As was learned in Math b, a point in Euclidean three space can be thought of

### Row Echelon Form and Reduced Row Echelon Form

These notes closely follow the presentation of the material given in David C Lay s textbook Linear Algebra and its Applications (3rd edition) These notes are intended primarily for in-class presentation

### Solution to Homework 2

Solution to Homework 2 Olena Bormashenko September 23, 2011 Section 1.4: 1(a)(b)(i)(k), 4, 5, 14; Section 1.5: 1(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(n), 2(a)(c), 13, 16, 17, 18, 27 Section 1.4 1. Compute the following, if

### MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 18: Rank and nullity of a matrix.

MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 18: Rank and nullity of a matrix. Nullspace Let A = (a ij ) be an m n matrix. Definition. The nullspace of the matrix A, denoted N(A), is the set of all n-dimensional column

### Direct Methods for Solving Linear Systems. Matrix Factorization

Direct Methods for Solving Linear Systems Matrix Factorization Numerical Analysis (9th Edition) R L Burden & J D Faires Beamer Presentation Slides prepared by John Carroll Dublin City University c 2011

### Using row reduction to calculate the inverse and the determinant of a square matrix

Using row reduction to calculate the inverse and the determinant of a square matrix Notes for MATH 0290 Honors by Prof. Anna Vainchtein 1 Inverse of a square matrix An n n square matrix A is called invertible

### SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES WITH THE TI-89. by Joseph Collison

SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES WITH THE TI-89 by Joseph Collison Copyright 2000 by Joseph Collison All rights reserved Reproduction or translation of any part of this work beyond that permitted by Sections

### Lecture 5 Principal Minors and the Hessian

Lecture 5 Principal Minors and the Hessian Eivind Eriksen BI Norwegian School of Management Department of Economics October 01, 2010 Eivind Eriksen (BI Dept of Economics) Lecture 5 Principal Minors and

### LS.6 Solution Matrices

LS.6 Solution Matrices In the literature, solutions to linear systems often are expressed using square matrices rather than vectors. You need to get used to the terminology. As before, we state the definitions

### LINEAR ALGEBRA. September 23, 2010

LINEAR ALGEBRA September 3, 00 Contents 0. LU-decomposition.................................... 0. Inverses and Transposes................................. 0.3 Column Spaces and NullSpaces.............................

GENERATING SETS KEITH CONRAD 1 Introduction In R n, every vector can be written as a unique linear combination of the standard basis e 1,, e n A notion weaker than a basis is a spanning set: a set of vectors

### Lecture 2 Matrix Operations

Lecture 2 Matrix Operations transpose, sum & difference, scalar multiplication matrix multiplication, matrix-vector product matrix inverse 2 1 Matrix transpose transpose of m n matrix A, denoted A T or

### Lecture Notes 2: Matrices as Systems of Linear Equations

2: Matrices as Systems of Linear Equations 33A Linear Algebra, Puck Rombach Last updated: April 13, 2016 Systems of Linear Equations Systems of linear equations can represent many things You have probably

### Abstract: We describe the beautiful LU factorization of a square matrix (or how to write Gaussian elimination in terms of matrix multiplication).

MAT 2 (Badger, Spring 202) LU Factorization Selected Notes September 2, 202 Abstract: We describe the beautiful LU factorization of a square matrix (or how to write Gaussian elimination in terms of matrix

### Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

### 1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES

1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES What is a vector? Many are familiar with the concept of a vector as: Something which has magnitude and direction. an ordered pair or triple. a description for quantities such

### MAT188H1S Lec0101 Burbulla

Winter 206 Linear Transformations A linear transformation T : R m R n is a function that takes vectors in R m to vectors in R n such that and T (u + v) T (u) + T (v) T (k v) k T (v), for all vectors u

### MATH2210 Notebook 1 Fall Semester 2016/2017. 1 MATH2210 Notebook 1 3. 1.1 Solving Systems of Linear Equations... 3

MATH0 Notebook Fall Semester 06/07 prepared by Professor Jenny Baglivo c Copyright 009 07 by Jenny A. Baglivo. All Rights Reserved. Contents MATH0 Notebook 3. Solving Systems of Linear Equations........................

### RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS

RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS SVANTE JANSON Abstract. This is a collection of classical results about resultants and discriminants for polynomials, compiled mainly for my own use. All results

### Math 312 Homework 1 Solutions

Math 31 Homework 1 Solutions Last modified: July 15, 01 This homework is due on Thursday, July 1th, 01 at 1:10pm Please turn it in during class, or in my mailbox in the main math office (next to 4W1) Please

### Vector and Matrix Norms

Chapter 1 Vector and Matrix Norms 11 Vector Spaces Let F be a field (such as the real numbers, R, or complex numbers, C) with elements called scalars A Vector Space, V, over the field F is a non-empty

### MAT 242 Test 2 SOLUTIONS, FORM T

MAT 242 Test 2 SOLUTIONS, FORM T 5 3 5 3 3 3 3. Let v =, v 5 2 =, v 3 =, and v 5 4 =. 3 3 7 3 a. [ points] The set { v, v 2, v 3, v 4 } is linearly dependent. Find a nontrivial linear combination of these

### 4: EIGENVALUES, EIGENVECTORS, DIAGONALIZATION

4: EIGENVALUES, EIGENVECTORS, DIAGONALIZATION STEVEN HEILMAN Contents 1. Review 1 2. Diagonal Matrices 1 3. Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues 2 4. Characteristic Polynomial 4 5. Diagonalizability 6 6. Appendix:

### 13 MATH FACTS 101. 2 a = 1. 7. The elements of a vector have a graphical interpretation, which is particularly easy to see in two or three dimensions.

3 MATH FACTS 0 3 MATH FACTS 3. Vectors 3.. Definition We use the overhead arrow to denote a column vector, i.e., a linear segment with a direction. For example, in three-space, we write a vector in terms

### 1 Determinants and the Solvability of Linear Systems

1 Determinants and the Solvability of Linear Systems In the last section we learned how to use Gaussian elimination to solve linear systems of n equations in n unknowns The section completely side-stepped

### 15.062 Data Mining: Algorithms and Applications Matrix Math Review

.6 Data Mining: Algorithms and Applications Matrix Math Review The purpose of this document is to give a brief review of selected linear algebra concepts that will be useful for the course and to develop

### 4.5 Linear Dependence and Linear Independence

4.5 Linear Dependence and Linear Independence 267 32. {v 1, v 2 }, where v 1, v 2 are collinear vectors in R 3. 33. Prove that if S and S are subsets of a vector space V such that S is a subset of S, then

### December 4, 2013 MATH 171 BASIC LINEAR ALGEBRA B. KITCHENS

December 4, 2013 MATH 171 BASIC LINEAR ALGEBRA B KITCHENS The equation 1 Lines in two-dimensional space (1) 2x y = 3 describes a line in two-dimensional space The coefficients of x and y in the equation

### Elementary Matrices and The LU Factorization

lementary Matrices and The LU Factorization Definition: ny matrix obtained by performing a single elementary row operation (RO) on the identity (unit) matrix is called an elementary matrix. There are three

### Linear Codes. Chapter 3. 3.1 Basics

Chapter 3 Linear Codes In order to define codes that we can encode and decode efficiently, we add more structure to the codespace. We shall be mainly interested in linear codes. A linear code of length

### Lecture 4: Partitioned Matrices and Determinants

Lecture 4: Partitioned Matrices and Determinants 1 Elementary row operations Recall the elementary operations on the rows of a matrix, equivalent to premultiplying by an elementary matrix E: (1) multiplying

### Methods for Finding Bases

Methods for Finding Bases Bases for the subspaces of a matrix Row-reduction methods can be used to find bases. Let us now look at an example illustrating how to obtain bases for the row space, null space,

### DETERMINANTS IN THE KRONECKER PRODUCT OF MATRICES: THE INCIDENCE MATRIX OF A COMPLETE GRAPH

DETERMINANTS IN THE KRONECKER PRODUCT OF MATRICES: THE INCIDENCE MATRIX OF A COMPLETE GRAPH CHRISTOPHER RH HANUSA AND THOMAS ZASLAVSKY Abstract We investigate the least common multiple of all subdeterminants,

### Lecture 1: Systems of Linear Equations

MTH Elementary Matrix Algebra Professor Chao Huang Department of Mathematics and Statistics Wright State University Lecture 1 Systems of Linear Equations ² Systems of two linear equations with two variables

### Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2012

Linear Algebra I Ronald van Luijk, 2012 With many parts from Linear Algebra I by Michael Stoll, 2007 Contents 1. Vector spaces 3 1.1. Examples 3 1.2. Fields 4 1.3. The field of complex numbers. 6 1.4.

### Operation Count; Numerical Linear Algebra

10 Operation Count; Numerical Linear Algebra 10.1 Introduction Many computations are limited simply by the sheer number of required additions, multiplications, or function evaluations. If floating-point

### Chapter 7. Matrices. Definition. An m n matrix is an array of numbers set out in m rows and n columns. Examples. ( 1 1 5 2 0 6

Chapter 7 Matrices Definition An m n matrix is an array of numbers set out in m rows and n columns Examples (i ( 1 1 5 2 0 6 has 2 rows and 3 columns and so it is a 2 3 matrix (ii 1 0 7 1 2 3 3 1 is a

### Inner Product Spaces and Orthogonality

Inner Product Spaces and Orthogonality week 3-4 Fall 2006 Dot product of R n The inner product or dot product of R n is a function, defined by u, v a b + a 2 b 2 + + a n b n for u a, a 2,, a n T, v b,

### 7 Gaussian Elimination and LU Factorization

7 Gaussian Elimination and LU Factorization In this final section on matrix factorization methods for solving Ax = b we want to take a closer look at Gaussian elimination (probably the best known method

### Linear Equations ! 25 30 35\$ & " 350 150% & " 11,750 12,750 13,750% MATHEMATICS LEARNING SERVICE Centre for Learning and Professional Development

MathsTrack (NOTE Feb 2013: This is the old version of MathsTrack. New books will be created during 2013 and 2014) Topic 4 Module 9 Introduction Systems of to Matrices Linear Equations Income = Tickets!

### Lecture 1: Schur s Unitary Triangularization Theorem

Lecture 1: Schur s Unitary Triangularization Theorem This lecture introduces the notion of unitary equivalence and presents Schur s theorem and some of its consequences It roughly corresponds to Sections

### Name: Section Registered In:

Name: Section Registered In: Math 125 Exam 3 Version 1 April 24, 2006 60 total points possible 1. (5pts) Use Cramer s Rule to solve 3x + 4y = 30 x 2y = 8. Be sure to show enough detail that shows you are

### Lectures notes on orthogonal matrices (with exercises) 92.222 - Linear Algebra II - Spring 2004 by D. Klain

Lectures notes on orthogonal matrices (with exercises) 92.222 - Linear Algebra II - Spring 2004 by D. Klain 1. Orthogonal matrices and orthonormal sets An n n real-valued matrix A is said to be an orthogonal

### Linear Algebra Notes

Linear Algebra Notes Chapter 19 KERNEL AND IMAGE OF A MATRIX Take an n m matrix a 11 a 12 a 1m a 21 a 22 a 2m a n1 a n2 a nm and think of it as a function A : R m R n The kernel of A is defined as Note

### 1 Introduction to Matrices

1 Introduction to Matrices In this section, important definitions and results from matrix algebra that are useful in regression analysis are introduced. While all statements below regarding the columns

### Lecture notes on linear algebra

Lecture notes on linear algebra David Lerner Department of Mathematics University of Kansas These are notes of a course given in Fall, 2007 and 2008 to the Honors sections of our elementary linear algebra

### THE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE

THE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE KEITH CONRAD This handout is a supplementary discussion leading up to the definition of dimension and some of its basic properties. Let V be a vector space over a field

### PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

### Linear Algebra: Determinants, Inverses, Rank

D Linear Algebra: Determinants, Inverses, Rank D 1 Appendix D: LINEAR ALGEBRA: DETERMINANTS, INVERSES, RANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page D.1. Introduction D 3 D.2. Determinants D 3 D.2.1. Some Properties of

### DETERMINANTS TERRY A. LORING

DETERMINANTS TERRY A. LORING 1. Determinants: a Row Operation By-Product The determinant is best understood in terms of row operations, in my opinion. Most books start by defining the determinant via formulas

### Linearly Independent Sets and Linearly Dependent Sets

These notes closely follow the presentation of the material given in David C. Lay s textbook Linear Algebra and its Applications (3rd edition). These notes are intended primarily for in-class presentation

### 1.2 Solving a System of Linear Equations

1.. SOLVING A SYSTEM OF LINEAR EQUATIONS 1. Solving a System of Linear Equations 1..1 Simple Systems - Basic De nitions As noticed above, the general form of a linear system of m equations in n variables

### 18.06 Problem Set 4 Solution Due Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 4 pm in 2-106. Total: 175 points.

806 Problem Set 4 Solution Due Wednesday, March 2009 at 4 pm in 2-06 Total: 75 points Problem : A is an m n matrix of rank r Suppose there are right-hand-sides b for which A x = b has no solution (a) What

### Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations

S. Widnall 16.07 Dynamics Fall 2009 Lecture notes based on J. Peraire Version 2.0 Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations By using vectors and defining appropriate operations between

### Notes on Linear Algebra. Peter J. Cameron

Notes on Linear Algebra Peter J. Cameron ii Preface Linear algebra has two aspects. Abstractly, it is the study of vector spaces over fields, and their linear maps and bilinear forms. Concretely, it is

### Similar matrices and Jordan form

Similar matrices and Jordan form We ve nearly covered the entire heart of linear algebra once we ve finished singular value decompositions we ll have seen all the most central topics. A T A is positive

### Orthogonal Diagonalization of Symmetric Matrices

MATH10212 Linear Algebra Brief lecture notes 57 Gram Schmidt Process enables us to find an orthogonal basis of a subspace. Let u 1,..., u k be a basis of a subspace V of R n. We begin the process of finding

### Notes on Orthogonal and Symmetric Matrices MENU, Winter 2013

Notes on Orthogonal and Symmetric Matrices MENU, Winter 201 These notes summarize the main properties and uses of orthogonal and symmetric matrices. We covered quite a bit of material regarding these topics,

### I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called

### 6. Cholesky factorization

6. Cholesky factorization EE103 (Fall 2011-12) triangular matrices forward and backward substitution the Cholesky factorization solving Ax = b with A positive definite inverse of a positive definite matrix

### Suk-Geun Hwang and Jin-Woo Park

Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 43 (2006), No. 3, pp. 471 478 A NOTE ON PARTIAL SIGN-SOLVABILITY Suk-Geun Hwang and Jin-Woo Park Abstract. In this paper we prove that if Ax = b is a partial signsolvable linear

### T ( a i x i ) = a i T (x i ).

Chapter 2 Defn 1. (p. 65) Let V and W be vector spaces (over F ). We call a function T : V W a linear transformation form V to W if, for all x, y V and c F, we have (a) T (x + y) = T (x) + T (y) and (b)

### Some Lecture Notes and In-Class Examples for Pre-Calculus:

Some Lecture Notes and In-Class Examples for Pre-Calculus: Section.7 Definition of a Quadratic Inequality A quadratic inequality is any inequality that can be put in one of the forms ax + bx + c < 0 ax

### 26 Integers: Multiplication, Division, and Order

26 Integers: Multiplication, Division, and Order Integer multiplication and division are extensions of whole number multiplication and division. In multiplying and dividing integers, the one new issue

### The Singular Value Decomposition in Symmetric (Löwdin) Orthogonalization and Data Compression

The Singular Value Decomposition in Symmetric (Löwdin) Orthogonalization and Data Compression The SVD is the most generally applicable of the orthogonal-diagonal-orthogonal type matrix decompositions Every

### Math 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces

Math 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces Dan Collins The textbook defines a subspace of a vector space in Chapter 4, but it avoids ever discussing the notion of a quotient space. This is understandable

### Inner products on R n, and more

Inner products on R n, and more Peyam Ryan Tabrizian Friday, April 12th, 2013 1 Introduction You might be wondering: Are there inner products on R n that are not the usual dot product x y = x 1 y 1 + +

### Solving Systems of Linear Equations

LECTURE 5 Solving Systems of Linear Equations Recall that we introduced the notion of matrices as a way of standardizing the expression of systems of linear equations In today s lecture I shall show how

### Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, Matrix Factoring, and Principal Components

Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, Matrix Factoring, and Principal Components The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a square matrix play a key role in some important operations in statistics. In particular, they

### ( ) which must be a vector

MATH 37 Linear Transformations from Rn to Rm Dr. Neal, WKU Let T : R n R m be a function which maps vectors from R n to R m. Then T is called a linear transformation if the following two properties are