Bridge Data System. Structural Guide
|
|
|
- Willa Beasley
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bridge Data System Structural Guide October 2009
2 Contents 1 Introduction General Background Information Structures to be included in the BDS BDS Structure Maintaining the BDS Data Modifying Existing Records Adding New Records Further Guidance Structural Element Data Production Bridge General Data (BDS Input Form No. 1) DECK Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 2) TDECK Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 3) BEAM Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 4) VBEAM Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 5) TRANS Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 6) INFLUENCE Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 7) CHECK Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 8) CHECK 1 Element Data CHECK 2 Element Data CHECK 3 Element Data INTER Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 9/9a)...31 APPENDIX A - STRUCTURAL INPUT FORMS...34 October 2009
3 1 Introduction 1.1 General The purpose of this guide is to provide all users responsible for the preparation and maintenance of data for the Bridge Data System (BDS) with an understanding of the contents of the inventory and the requirements for updating the data. 1.2 Background Information The BDS is a NZ Transport Agency database designed to assist with the effective management of bridge and culvert structures on the State Highway network, and contains all: bridges large culverts (those with a cross sectional area greater than or equal to 3.4m 2 ) The BDS is used for maintaining up-to-date structural information for all structures on the state highway network that are sensitive to overweight vehicle loads, and is used by OPermit to assist with the evaluation of overweight permit applications for travel on the State Highway network. 1.3 Structures to be included in the BDS All bridges and culverts shall be included in the BDS, except for any culvert : that has a span of less than 2m, that has more than 1m of fill above, that has no unusual circumstances. October
4 1.4 BDS Structure Bridge information is stored in a hierarchical structure as illustrated below. Figure 1: BDS Data Structure Each bridge/culvert is described by the General Bridge Data and is further represented by at least one of the underlying element types (Deck, TDeck, Beam etc.), which contain specific information about each element of the structure. Element GENERAL DECK TDECK BEAM VBEAM TRANS INF CHECK INTER Description General information about the structure, including name, location, carriageway width etc. Form No.1 is to be filled out for all structures. Used to model reinforced concrete deck slabs. Used to model timber decks. Used to model longitudinal components (as an equivalent simply supported span) such as main beams or stringers where the components are of similar capacity and evenly spaced. Similar to BEAM elements but used where beams are asymmetrically spaced, are of differing capacities or there are discontinuities in the structure cross section. Used to represent transoms. For critical components (where BEAM elements are unsuitable), the overload effects are determined from influence lines. CHECK elements comprise comments or instructions, and are used to augment structure data or outline specific actions required as part of the overweight permit process. Similar to INF elements but allows two longitudinal influence lines to be stored along with a capacity interaction diagram. Table 1: Element Descriptions October
5 1.5 Maintaining the BDS Data It is vitally important that whenever a new bridge or culvert is constructed, or whenever existing structures are widened/replaced or their capacities are revised, the BDS is updated. The success of the BDS is dependant on the quality and completeness of the data it contains. The Regional Bridge Consultants are responsible for providing the information for input Modifying Existing Records Where an update is related to an existing structure recorded in the BDS, a copy of the BDS report for that structure (available directly from the BDS or from regional hardcopy sets held by each Regional Bridge Consultant (RBC) and/or NZ Transport Agency Bridge Champion) should be marked up with the revised values/data and ed to the National Office for updating Adding New Records The first step in adding new records to the BDS is to determine how the structure is to be represented in the BDS. i.e. which element data is required to best model the structure. A General Bridge Data form (BDS Input Form No. 1) must be completed for every new structure. For each element used to represent a structure there is a corresponding data entry form that must be filled in to record the necessary data. A hard copy of each data entry form is included in Appendix A and is available from the BDS through the Forms Button in the Menu bar. Examples of typical scenarios are included below: Scenario Evenly spaced beams and insitu r.c. deck slab Evenly spaced beams and timber deck Box culvert Armco Culvert Slab Truss, transoms, stringers and timber deck Box Girder Widened bridges, asymmetric beam spacing, discontinuous decks Bridges with critical component such as cantilever pier cap. Bridges with a specific Gross Weight limit (e.g. suspension bridges). Widened bridges where one lane is stronger than the remainder of the carriageway. Arch bridges or bridges with critical components such as columns. Suggested Element Types GENERAL, DECK, & BEAM GENERAL, TDECK, & BEAM GENERAL & BEAM GENERAL & BEAM GENERAL & BEAM or DECK GENERAL, TDECK, BEAM & TRANS GENERAL, BEAM & DECK GENERAL, VBEAM & DECK INF & element types as suggested above CHECK1 plus element types as suggested above. CHECK 2 plus element types as suggested above. INTER plus element types as suggested above. Table 2: Suggested Elements for Typical Scenarios October
6 1.6 Further Guidance The purpose of this guide is to provide an understanding of the contents of the BDS and the requirements for updating the data. It has been prepared using the following documents. Where further guidance is required it is recommended that these documents be referenced: Bridge Overweight Rating and Posting Weight Assessment (TNZ Manual Number: SP/M/018) June 2002 Bridge Manual Second Edition (TNZ Manual Number: SP/M/022) June 2003 October
7 2 Structural Element data production The purpose of this chapter is to give a brief introduction to each element type and define the required information for each field on the data entry forms. The importance of each field (i.e. mandatory, optional or default) is identified and, where applicable, the required units are noted. Where applicable, reference has been made to other documents for a more in-depth explanation of how the expected data is calculated. October
8 2.1 Bridge General Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 1) For every new record added to the BDS, Input Form No. 1, Bridge General Data, must be completed. This form is used to record general data specific to the structure, such as location, name, presence of bypasses etc. Bridge Name BRIDGE GENERAL DATA FORM FIELDS LOCATION DATA The name signposted on the bridge (usually the river or stream name), or if not signposted, the name by which the bridge is known. If a signposted bridge is also known by an alternative name (if for instance the waterway and bridge have different names), this is shown additionally in brackets, e.g.: INANGAHUA RIVER (REEFTON) BRIDGE For Miscellaneous bridges (those structures that are adjacent to or pass over the SH and within the road reserve) the name will include the adjacent state highway in brackets, e.g.: HIKURANGI CULVERT NO.2 (ADJ. SH1N) McEWAN ROAD OVERBRIDGE (OVER SH15A) SH Code The relevant State Highway number. For bridges over or adjacent to State Highways, the highway is shown as MIS. Route Position (RP) The Route Position (Reference Station plus Displacement) where the bridge is located, taken at the first abutment in the Increasing direction. For miscellaneous bridges the Route Position is the adjacent position on the State Highway. BSN The Bridge Structure Number (BSN) is the (signposted) number assigned to the structure. The number must be sequential in the Increasing Direction and unique to the SH. The formula is BSN = (RS + Displacement)*10. October
9 Region NZTA region in which the structure is situated: 1- Auckland 2- Hamilton 3 - Napier 4 - Wanganui 5 - Wellington 6 - Christchurch 7 - Dunedin 8 - Nelson 9 - Marlborough Roads Network Area The direction of traffic using the bridge. This may be: 1A Northland 1B - Auckland North 1C - Auckland South 1D Auckland Motorway Alliance 2A - West Waikato 2B - East Waikato 2C - Bay Roads 2D - Tauranga District 2E - PSMC 001 2F - Central Waikato 2G - Rotorua 2H - Bay of Plenty 3A - Gisborne 3B Napier 4A West Wanganui 5A - Wellington 5B - Nelson 5C Marlborough Roads 6A West Coast 6B North Canterbury 6C South Canterbury 7A Central Otago 7B Coastal Otago 7C Southland October
10 Structural Comments Optional Structural Comments are messages to explain specific issues or requirements, or explain the reasons behind the modelling of the structural data. Typical examples of Structural Comments are: MCAP and SCAP specified for 3.5m width equivalent simple span Details of Deck Slab Span 2 not known Transverse Cross-Frames for Spans 1 to 3 ECENTR is for truck central on southbound carriageway only, not full deck October
11 Direction BYPASS AND POSTING DATA The direction of traffic using the bridge. This may be: 1 Two Way (one, two or more lanes): traffic travels in both the Increasing and Decreasing Direction 2 One Way: traffic travels only in the Increasing Direction 3 One Way: traffic travels only in the Decreasing Direction Bypass Type Indicates if a bypass is available for the bridge and the type of bypass. Bypass codes are: 0 No bypass exists 1 An off-highway bypass exists 2 A bypass exists consisting of a bridge for traffic in the opposite direction 3 Two forms of bypass exist i.e. 1 and 2 above. Bypass Description Optional A brief description of the off-the highway bypass. E.g. Adjacent highway ford available. Posted Speed Limit This is the legal speed limit (in km/h) applying to the bridge, which may be a value posted on the bridge, or the highway limit. An entry of None indicates the open road limit and a value of 100km/h is assumed. Posting The posted weight limit on the bridge as a percentage of Class Ι (One). The posting must be a multiple of 10.If the bridge is not posted then enter None. October
12 Width The carriageway width of the bridge in metres to two decimal places between kerb faces or guard rails. DCF The capacity of the most critical section of deck expressed as a proportion of the load effect produced by the rating load (Refer NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second edition, Section 6.5). DCF = Overload wheel load capacity Rating load effect min Increasing RestrictX The optimum transverse position (m) for the vehicle centreline, measured from the left hand carriageway edge in the Increasing highway direction. Kerb or Guard Rail Kerb or Guard Rail V ehicle C entreline Bridge C/L Increasing Direction RestrictX Figure 2 RestrictX Conventions An entry of 0 indicates that the optimum position is central on the carriageway. Decreasing RestrictX For bridges with central median barriers where the optimum Increasing Restrict X values or Central Restrictions place the vehicle on the barrier, or on the opposing carriageway. Decreasing Restrict X is the optimum Decreasing highway direction transverse position (m) for the vehicle centreline, measured from the left hand Decreasing carriageway edge. October
13 2.2 DECK Element Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 2) Deck elements are used to model reinforced concrete deck slabs. A number of different rectangular slab types are available, as indicated by the Type Code. A number of different DECK elements may be input for a single bridge, with a separate data entry form being provided for each one. Bridge Name DECK ELEMENT DATA FORM FIELDS As defined previously (Refer 2.1) BSN As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Direction As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Type Default Always DECK Description A brief description of the deck element being represented. E.g. Edge deck slab spans 1-3 etc. Impact Code Default The impact code is used to identify the appropriate impact factors to be applied to the element at each restriction level. Applications are generally as follows: Impact Code Application 1 Timber 2 Concrete Deck Slabs 3 Main members other than timber (normal circumstances) 4, 5 Members subjected to abnormally severe impact As DECK elements are used to model reinforced concrete deck slabs the Impact Code is always 2 for DECK elements. Breadth Transverse span of the slab in metres to two decimal places. October
14 Length Longitudinal span of the concrete deck slab in metres to two decimal places. Depth Slab thickness in metres to two decimal places. Surface Depth of surfacing/fill on the slab in metres to two decimal places. Type Code Defines the edge conditions of each deck element. Possible Type Codes are: 1 = all edges encastre (interior slab) -1 = all edges simply supported 2 = edge 3 free, other edges fixed -2 = edge 3 free, other edges simply supported 3 = edge 4 free, other edges fixed -3 = edge 4 free, other edges simply supported 4 = edges 1 and 2 fixed, edges 3 and 4 free -4 = edges 1 and 2 simply supported, edges 3 and 4 free 5 = edge 1 fixed, edge 2 simply supported, edges 3 and 4 free -5 = edge 1 simply supported, edge 2 fixed, edges 3 and 4 free Y Y' Positive Highway Direction (Longitudinal) Edge 3 Edge 2 DECK ELEMENT No. i Edge 1 Edge 4 X' Transverse Direction X Left hand kerb position (X=0) Position (i) Figure 3: Deck Element Conventions October
15 Subdiv Subdiv is used to determine the number of grid members, including the edge beams, spanning the longer span. This value is used to determine grillage layout for grid analysis of deck elements. Pois Optional Poisson s Ratio. Default value is DCF The capacity of this deck element expressed as a proportion of the load effect produced by the rating load (Refer NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second edition, Section 6.5). DCF = Overload wheel load capacity Rating load effect HTCAP Optional Transverse overload hogging moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.5) per unit width (kn.m/m). HLCAP Optional Longitudinal overload hogging moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.5) per unit width (kn.m/m). STCAP Optional Transverse overload sagging moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.5) per unit width (kn.m/m). SLCAP Optional Longitudinal overload sagging moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.5) per unit width (kn.m/m). Note: If any of the variables HTCAP, HLCAP, STCAP or SLCAP are zero, it is assumed that the corresponding moments generated cannot be critical and hence need not be checked. Values for at least one of these variables must be input. October
16 Number Optional The number of positions in which the deck element appears across the transverse bridge section. It is used in conjunction with the Element Position to determine the limits on the transverse positioning of the overweight vehicles on this element. If stored as zero with no Element Position values, then it is assumed that the vehicle may be positioned anywhere on the element to produce the worst possible results. Element Position Optional The x co-ordinate values at which edge 3 of the element is positioned (See Figure 3). Guard Optional If there are two symmetrical edge slabs where Type Code is 2, -2, 3, -3, 4, -4, 5 or -5, then these can be covered by one element, by putting Number = 0 and Guard = distance a from the outside slab edge to the edge of carriageway (positive). The options for edge slabs are shown below: CASE 1 Two symmetrical edge slabs TYPE_CODE = 2,-2,3,-3, 4,-4,5 or -5 NUMBER = 0 Position = a (+ve) Kerb or Guard Rail Positive Direction Kerb or Guard Rail CASE 2 LHS Edge Slab TYPE_CODE = 2,-2,4,-4, 5 or -5 NUMBER = 1 Position = a (-ve) Kerb or Guard Rail Positive Direction Kerb or Guard Rail a Width a a Width CASE 3 RHS edge slab Kerb or Guard Rail Kerb or Guard Rail TYPE_CODE = 3,-3,4,-4, 5 or -5 NUMBER = 1 Position = a (+ve) Positive Direction a Width Figure 4: Edge Slab Conventions October
17 2.3 TDECK Element Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 3) TDECK elements are used to model all timber decks, whether spanning transversely or longitudinally. A number of different TDECK elements may be input for a single bridge, with a separate data entry form being provided for each one Bridge Name TDECK ELEMENT DATA FORM FIELDS As defined previously (Refer 2.1) BSN As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Direction As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Type Default Always TDECK Description A brief description of the TDECK element. E.g. 200 X 100 TRANSVERSE PLANKS + 50 RUNNING PLANKS etc. Impact Code Default The impact code is used to identify the appropriate impact factors to be applied to the element. Applications are generally as follows: Impact Code Application 1 Timber 2 Concrete Deck Slabs 3 Main members other than timber (normal circumstances) 4, 5 Members subjected to abnormally severe impact Hence, the Impact Code is always 1 for TDECK elements. October
18 Type_Code This defines the type of deck. Available Codes are: 1 Spanning Transversely 2 Spanning Longitudinally Span The effective span length of the TDECK element in metres taken as the clear distance between supporting members plus one half width of a supporting member. This should not exceed the clear span between supporting members plus the element thickness. MCAP This is the overload moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.5.4) per unit width (kn.m/m). TDECK elements are analysed as simply supported elements. If the timber deck elements are continuous over two or more spans, MCAP may be increased by 25% (provided live load moments are being calculated on a simple span basis). Ref. Bridge Manual, (a) The capacity used for comparison with calculated live load moments is MCAP multiplied by the distribution width identified by DIST_CODE below. SCAP This is the overload shear capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.5.4) per unit width (kn./m). If shear is assumed not to be critical, then enter as zero. The capacity used for comparison with calculated live load shear is SCAP multiplied by the distribution width identified by DIST_CODE below. October
19 Plank The width of the plank for planked decks (DIST_CODE = 1, 2) or the depth of the deck for laminated decks (DIST_CODE = 3 to 6) DIST_CODE This indicates the allowable distribution of a wheel load. Available codes are: 1 - Planks laid flat without running planks at least 50mm thick 2 - Planks laid flat with running planks at least 50m thick 3 - Nail laminated deck, fabricated in baulks, with no shear connection between them 4 - Nail laminated deck with end laminations well supported and either: (a) Fabricated in baulks with shear connection between them by steel dowels or other means (b) Fabricated in baulks and having running planks over them, more than 50mm (c) thick Fabricated continuously in situ across the span, with no unconnected joints between laminations 5 - Glue laminated deck, fabricated in baulks with no shear connection between them 6 - Glue laminated deck, otherwise as 4 (a), (b) or (c) These codes correspond with the Bridge Manual, (a), (i) to (vi). Number (Type_Code 1 only) For elements with Type_Code 1, the number of positions in which the element occurs across the transverse bridge section. This is used in conjunction with Position to determine the limits on the transverse positioning of the overweight vehicles on this element. If stored as zero, then it is assumed that the vehicle can be positioned anywhere on the element to produce the worst possible effects. October
20 Position Optional The x coordinate at which edge 3 of the element (as illustrated below) is positioned. Y Y' Edge 2 Positive Highway Direction Edge 3 TDECK Element No. i Edge 1 Edge 4 X' Transverse Direction X Left hand kerb position (X=0) Position (i) Figure 4: TDeck Element Conventions If Number is zero, then no values are stored. October
21 2.4 BEAM Element Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 4) BEAM elements are used to model longitudinal components such as main beams and stringers. A number of different BEAM elements may be input for a single bridge, with a separate data entry form being provided for each one Each element is represented as a simply supported beam with an eccentricity factor to allow for transverse distribution effects. Bridge Name BEAM ELEMENT DATA FORM FIELDS As defined previously (Refer 2.1) BSN As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Direction As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Type Default Always BEAM Description A brief description of the BEAM element. E.g. PSC Hollow Core Units - Span 1. October
22 Impact Code Default The effect of applying increasing restrictions is to reduce the impact factor. The impact factor of any restriction level is calculated in accordance with the stored impact code as follows: Impact Code Equation 1 I = I = ( K v )K s 3 For shear, I = ( K v )K s For moment, I = min of ( K v )K s and, ( K v /(L+38))K s 4 I = ( K v )K s 5 For shear, I = ( K v )K s For moment, I = min of ( K v )K s and, ( K v /(L+38))K s Where I = Impact Factor, L = Span of the element in metres K v = a function of truck speed K s = a function of truck speed Values of K v used in the impact equations are: Vehicle Restriction Restriction Level K v K s Unrestricted km/h Own Lane km/h Own Lane Crawl Own Lane Crawl Central Applications are generally as follows: Impact Code Application 1 Timber 2 Concrete Deck Slabs 3 Main members other than timber (normal circumstances) 4, 5 Members subjected to abnormally severe impact Hence, the Impact Code for BEAM elements may be 1, 3, 4 or 5 depending on the material and/or impact conditionsthe effect of applying increasing restrictions is to reduce the impact factor. The impact factor of any restriction level is calculated in accordance with the stored impact code as follows: October
23 ESTD The eccentricity factor is defined, for beam and slab bridges as: ESTD (Beam bridge) = Moment in most heavily loaded beam (or truss) Average moment per beam (or truss) and ESTD (Slab bridge) = Peak moment per metre width Average moment per metre width The carriageway shall normally be divided into lanes as defined in the NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual, but in the case of a multilane bridge carrying traffic in one direction only, shoulders may be excluded from the carriageway. Wide slab, short span structures (e.g. short span multi-lane box culvert) may be represented as a 3.67m wide strip with ESTD = 1.0 For single lane bridges, ESTD shall be calculated with the load at extreme eccentricity in the lane as defined in the Bridge Manual. For two, three or four lane bridges, ESTD shall be calculated for the condition of two lanes loaded. The loads in the two lanes shall be: - In one lane, 85% of one element of HN-72 loading, and - In one other lane, 85% of one element of HO-72 loading. Both load elements shall be placed at extreme eccentricity in the lane, as defined in the Bridge Manual. The lanes to be loaded shall be chosen so as to produce the worst effect. Ideally the eccentricity factor should be determined using a method which takes into account the relative stiffness of longitudinal and transverse members. For bridges of one or two lanes, the simplified method given in AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges may be appropriate. For bridges wider than two lanes and for those cases where AASHTO is not appropriate, a more rigorous analysis such as a computer grillage analysis should be carried out. ECENTR This is the eccentricity factor with the vehicle central on the bridge, or at such other position (RestrictX) so as to maximise the allowable vehicle load. ECENTR shall be calculated for the condition of 85% of one element of HO-72 loading being the only load on the structure. October
24 Span Longitudinal span length of the element (m) MCAP This is the overload moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, Section 6.4.2) of the total bridge cross-section (kn.m). Note: For continuous or framed-in beams, MCAP must be the overload moment capacity of an equivalent simply supported member. Where beams have full moment continuity between spans, are of normal proportions and show no signs of distress, the following simplified procedure may be followed: The overall moment capacity of each span may be converted to that of an equivalent simple span by subtracting (algebraically) the midspan positive moment capacity from the mean of the two negative moment capacities at its supports. SCAP This is the overload shear capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, Section 6.4.2) of the total bridge cross-section (kn). If shear is assumed not to be critical, then enter as zero. October
25 2.5 VBEAM Element Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 5) VBEAM elements are similar to BEAM elements except that, instead of combining all of the longitudinal beams (or stringers) together and representing them as a single simply supported beam, each beam is considered in its actual position and assigned its own simply supported moment and shear capacities. This allows the inclusion of beams with different capacities and asymmetrical or uneven beam positioning with respect to the carriageway (E.g. widened and multi span bridges). These elements need not occupy the complete carriageway width. Two or more elements may be used to represent the total cross section if, for instance, the span lengths of the parts are different. Discontinuities (zero moment and/or shear capacity) in the transverse structure of the deck, which may be due to bridge widening, can also be included. Bridge Name VBEAM ELEMENT DATA FORM FIELDS As defined previously (Refer 2.1) BSN As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Direction As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Type Default Always VBEAM Description A brief description of the VBEAM element. E.g. OLD 2 BEAM STRUCTURE + WIDENING COMPRISING 11 PSC UNITS. October
26 Impact Code Applications are generally as follows: Refer 2.4 for definition of Impact Code. Impact Code Application 1 Timber 2 Concrete Deck Slabs 3 Main members other than timber (normal circumstances) 4, 5 Members subjected to abnormally severe impact The Impact Code for VBEAM elements may be 1, 3, 4 or 5 depending on the material and/or impact conditions. Span Longitudinal span length of the element in metres NBEAMS Number of longitudinal beams NDISC Number of discontinuities (may be zero). Discontinuities may be used in a number of ways: If the position of a discontinuity is given within ±0.01m of a beam position, the superstructure at that beam is taken as having a small moment capacity for moment distribution and the full reaction obtained by treating the deck as simply supported at the longitudinal beams is used at that beam. If a discontinuity is positioned between beams, this is taken to represent a complete break in the superstructure at this point, and loads have no effect across the break. If a discontinuity is positioned before the first beam or after the last beam, this indicates that the full extent of the element and any load outside these discontinuities does not affect the element. The distribution of loading to the first and last beams and all beams adjacent to a discontinuity is taken as the full reaction from the simply supported deck. Any interior beam not associated with a discontinuity takes a loading of 0.8 times the simply supported reaction. October
27 MCAP This is the overload moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.4.2) of each beam (kn.m). Note: For continuous or framed-in beams, MCAP must be the overload moment capacity of an equivalent simply supported member. Where beams have full moment continuity between spans, are of normal proportions and show no signs of distress, the following simplified procedure may be followed: The overall moment capacity of each beam may be converted to that of an equivalent simple beam by subtracting (algebraically) the midspan positive moment capacity from the mean of the two negative moment capacities at its supports. SCAP The overload shear capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.4.2) of each beam (kn). If shear is assumed not to be critical, then enter as zero. XPosition The distance to each beam centre in metres from the left hand kerb or guard rail (when looking in the increasing highway direction). Position of Discontinuities The distance of discontinuities in metres from the left hand kerb or guard rail (when looking in the Increasing highway direction). Discontinuity between original and new deck Position of discontinuity Deck widened using PSC Hollow core beams Original single lane bridge x1 x2 x3 xi = XPosition x4 x5 Figure 5: VBEAM Element Conventions October
28 2.6 TRANSOM Element Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 6) TRANSOM elements are used to represent transoms (i.e. transverse beams, supported at two points, which support longitudinal beams or stringers. The TRANSOM element also includes any portion of the transom cantilevering beyond the support points. Positive and negative capacities are assumed to be the same and the carriageway centreline is assumed to coincide with the centreline of the supporting beam system. Bridge Name TRANSOM ELEMENT DATA FORM FIELDS As defined previously (Refer 2.1) BSN As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Direction As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Type Default Always TRANSOM Description A brief description of the TRANSOM element. E.g. TRANSOMS SPANS 1 AND 4. Impact Code Applications are generally as follows:. Impact Code Application 1 Timber 2 Concrete Deck Slabs 3 Main members other than timber (normal circumstances) 4, 5 Members subjected to abnormally severe impact The Impact Code for TRANSOM elements may be 1, 3, 4 or 5 depending on the material and/or impact conditions. October
29 TSpan The length of the transom in metres between supports. SSpan The span length of the longitudinal stringers supported by the transom in metres MCAP The overload moment capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, Section 6.4) of each transom (kn.m) for an equivalent simply supported span. SCAP The overload shear capacity (as defined in NZ Transport Agency Bridge Manual Second Edition, 6.4) of each transom (kn) for an equivalent simply supported span. If shear is assumed not to be critical, then enter as zero. October
30 2.7 INFLUENCE Element Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 7) INFLUENCE elements are used in a similar manner to the BEAM elements, except that instead of calculating the truck effects on a simply supported span, the effect is determined from a longitudinal influence line of arbitrary shape. This allows components, for which it may not be appropriate to use an effective simply supported span (e.g. pier caps, cantilevered spans etc.), to be checked against an overload. The influence line applies to a fixed point on the bridge and to only one effect (e.g. only moment or only shear). Therefore only one capacity is stored for comparison. Two scale factors are provided, one for when the truck is central and one for when it is in its own lane. Changes in the magnitude of the influence line in these situations can thus be accounted for. A number of different INFLUENCE elements may be input for a single bridge, with a separate data entry form being provided for each one. The analysis for this element type is similar to that for a BEAM element except that instead of finding the maximum moment and shear on a simply supported span, the truck is positioned on the stored influence line to give the maximum effect. The basic overload effect (i.e. overload moment or overload shear) is multiplied by a scale factor either BSTD for the truck in its own lane or BCENTR for the truck central. BSTD is equivalent to ESTD for a BEAM element on a single lane bridge and to ESTD(1 + 1/K BASIC ) for a BEAM element on a bridge with two or more lanes, where K BASIC is the ratio M HO /M HN. BCENTR is equivalent to ECENTR for a BEAM element. The basic overload effect, when multiplied by the scale factor and impact factor, is compared with the stored capacity, CAPAC to determine the appropriate restriction level. No account is taken of traffic in an adjacent lane by this analysis, unless an adjustment is made to BSTD as described above. Bridge Name INFLUENCE ELEMENT DATA FORM FIELDS As defined previously (Refer 2.1) BSN As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Direction As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Type Default Always INFLUENCE October
31 Description A brief description of the INF element. E.g. TRANSVERSE CANTILEVER BEAMS - ALL SPANS. Impact Code Applications are generally as follows: Impact Code Application 1 Timber 2 Concrete Deck Slabs 3 Main members other than timber (normal circumstances) 4, 5 Members subjected to abnormally severe impact Refer 2.4 for definition of impact code. The impact factor applicable to the restriction level being considered is calculated using the stored value of YLength substituted for L. The Impact Code for INFLUENCE elements may be 1, 3, 4 or 5 depending on the material and/or impact conditions. StressNo Identifies the overload effect being represented by the INF element. Stress Overload Effect No 1 Moment 2 Shear BSTD The scale factor when the truck is in its own lane. BCENTR The scale factor when the truck is central. YLength The span length used for calculating the impact factor (m). CAPAC The capacity (moment or shear) used for comparison at the location represented by the influence line (kn.m or kn). Number The number of points on the influence line. October
32 YPosition Used to record the influence line position ordinates (m) from an arbitrary origin, in the longitudinal direction along the bridge deck. Influence Coefficient Influence coefficients (kn.m/kn.m for moment or KN/KN for shear) corresponding to the position ordinates. October
33 2.8 CHECK Element Data (BDS Structural Input Form No. 8) CHECK elements are messages to either augment the structural elements, explain specific requirements, or alert users to specific issues CHECK 1 Elements Where a CHECK 1 element is present, this is highlighted each time an Overweight Permit is processed for that bridge. This is to alert the Permit Officer and HMV driver to specific requirements of the permit. Typical examples of CHECK 1 elements are: Specific actions required as part of the overweight permit process, e.g. NO STRUCTURAL DETAILS - REFER TO BRIDGE CONSULTANT Bridges with a specific Gross Weight limit, e.g. Max Gross Overload - Supervised 50,000kg Gross. No other HMV on Bridge CHECK 2 Elements CHECK 2 elements are similar to CHECK 1 elements, but only apply where an overweight vehicle travels at Restriction Level 3 (i.e. 10 km/h Central or at offset RestrictX) on the bridge. Where a CHECK 2 comment is recorded, this is highlighted each time an overweight permit results in Restriction Level 3 for that bridge. This is to alert the HMV driver to specific requirements of the permit. A typical example of a CHECK 2 element is: VEHICLE CENTRELINE TO BE 4.1 M FROM UPSTREAM GUARDRAIL CHECK 3 Elements CHECK 3 elements are similar to CHECK 1 elements, but only apply where there is a specific condition that needs to be notified to an HMV driver. Where a CHECK 3 comment is recorded, this is highlighted on an overweight permit regardless of whether there is a Restriction Level for that bridge. This is useful to highlight Posted Bridges without a specific Weight Limit, or to alert an HMV driver to specific requirements for a bridge. Typical examples of CHECK 3 element are: MAX SPEED 20 KM/H. ONLY ONE HEAVY VEHICLE AT A TIME ON BRIDGE OVERLOAD VEHICLES MUST NOT TRAVEL ON SHOULDERS" October
34 2.9 INTER Element Data (BDS Input Form No. 9/9a) INTER elements are similar to INF elements except that two longitudinal influence lines can be stored (moment and axial force) and, instead of a fixed capacity, a capacity interaction line (moment versus axial force), which defines an area of acceptable load effects, is stored. The two influence lines apply to the load effects at a fixed point on the element. Two scale factors are provided, one for when the overload is central and one for when it is in its own lane. Changes in the magnitude of the influence line in these situations can thus be accounted for. It should be noted that the interaction diagram is assumed to consist of either a single valued function, M(P), or two single valued function, M - (P) and M + (P), which represent the interaction curve for negative and positive moment respectively. The ordinate pairs can be entered in any order. The analysis program will reorder the pairs, and store them in order of increasing P, for each of the two possible functions. Storage of points for the M - curve is optional. If not stored, then, by default, M - (P) = - M + (P) is assumed. A number of different INTER elements may be input for a single bridge, with a separate data entry form being provided for each one The analysis for this element type is similar to that for an INF element except that two load effects (moment and axial force) must be accounted for at each incremental position of the overload on the bridge span, and, instead of computing a maximum load effect, the load effects at each incremental position, when multiplied by the scale factor and impact factor, are compared against the capacity interaction line. The basic overload effects (i.e. moment and axial force) are multiplied by a scale factor either BSTD for the overload in its own lane or BCENTR for the overload central. BSTD is equivalent to ESTD for a BEAM element on a single lane bridge. Since no account is taken of traffic in an adjacent lane by this analysis, BSTD is equivalent to ESTD(1+1/K BASIC ) for a BEAM element on a bridge with two or more lanes, where K BASIC is the ratio M HO /M HN. BCENTR is equivalent to ECENTR for a BEAM element. Bridge Name INTER ELEMENT DATA FORM FIELDS BDS Input Form 9 Interaction Data As defined previously (Refer 2.1) BSN As defined previously (Refer 2.1) Direction As defined previously (Refer 2.1) October
35 Type Default Always INTER Description A brief description of the INTER element. E.g. RC ARCH Spans. Impact Code Applications are generally as follows:. Impact Code Application 1 Timber 2 Concrete Deck Slabs 3 Main members other than timber (normal circumstances) 4, 5 Members subjected to abnormally severe impact Refer 2.4 for definition of impact code. The impact factor applicable to the restriction level being considered is calculated using the stored value of Span substituted for L. The Impact Code for INTER elements may be 1, 3, 4 or 5 depending on the material and/or impact conditions. BSTD The scale factor when the truck is in its own lane. BCENTR The scale factor when the truck is central. Span The span length used for calculating the impact factor Inter The number of points on the capacity interaction line. Number The number of points on the influence line. MCAP The interaction line ordinates for moment (kn.m) October
36 PCAP The interaction line ordinates for axial force (kn) corresponding to the moment ordinates. YPosition Used to record the influence line position ordinates (m) from an arbitrary origin, in the longitudinal direction along the bridge deck. YPosition is recorded on BDS Input Form No. 9a Moment Coefficient The moment influence line coefficients (kn.m/kn) corresponding to the position ordinates. Moment coefficients are recorded on BDS Input Form No. 9a Axial Force Coefficient The axial force influence line coefficients (kn/kn) corresponding to the position ordinates. Axial force coefficients are recorded on BDS Input Form No. 9a October
37 APPENDIX A STRUCTURAL INPUT FORMS October
38 Bridge Data System BRIDGE GENERAL DATA (FORM No. 1) Note: This data is required for all structures. This sheet is accompanied by element data sheets. LOCATION DATA Bridge Name SH Code Route Position BSN Region Network Area Structural Comment BYPASS AND POSTING DATA Direction Bypass Type Bypass Description Posted Speed Limit Posting Width DCF RestrictX km/h m m Prepared: DATE: / / Checked: DATE: / / Certified for Release: DATE: / / Regional Bridge Inspection Engineer Bridge General Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 1
39 Bridge Data System DECK ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 2) Bridge Name BSN Direction DECK ELEMENT NO. OF Type DECK Description Impact Code 2 Breadth Length Depth Surface Type Code Subdiv 9 Pois DCF HTCAP HLCAP STCAP SLCAP Number m m m m knm/m knm/m knm/m knm/m If Number > 0: Element Position OR If Number = 0 and Type Code 1 or -1 Guard m PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / DECK Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 2
40 Bridge Data System TDECK ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 3) Bridge Name BSN Direction TDECK ELEMENT NO. OF Type TDECK Description Impact Code 1 Type Code Span TDeck MCAP TDeck SCAP Plank Dist Code Number m knm/m kn/m m If Number > 0 Element Position m PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / TDECK Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 3
41 Bridge Data System BEAM ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 4) Bridge Name BSN Direction BEAM ELEMENT NO. OF Type Description Impact Code ESTD ECENTR Span BEAM MCAP BEAM SCAP BEAM m knm kn PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / BEAM Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 4
42 Bridge Data System VBEAM ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 5) Bridge Name BSN Direction VBEAM ELEMENT NO. OF Type Description Impact Code Span NBeams NDisc VBEAM m MCap SCap XPosition knm kn m Position of Discontinuities: m PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / VBEAM Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 5
43 Bridge Data System TRANSOM ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 6) Bridge Name BSN Direction TRANSOM ELEMENT NO. OF Type Description Impact Code TSpan SSpan Trans MCAP Trans SCAP TRANSOM m m knm kn PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / TRANSOM Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 6
44 INFLUENCE ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 7) Bridge Data System Bridge Name BSN Direction INF ELEMENT NO. OF Type Description Impact Code StressNo Inf BSTD Inf BCENTRE YLength CAPAC Number INF m knm or kn Influence Line YPosition m Influence Coefficient knm/kn or kn/kn PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / INFLUENCE Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 7
45 Bridge Data System CHECK ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 8) Bridge Name BSN Direction CHECK 1 CHECK 2 CHECK 3 PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / CHECK Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 8
46 INTER ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 9) Bridge Data System Bridge Name BSN Direction INTER ELEMENT NO. OF Type Description Impact Code INTER BSTD INTER BCENTRE SPAN Inter Number INTER m Interaction Diagram MCAP knm PCAP kn PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / INTER Element Data October 2009 Structural Input Form No. 9
47 Bridge Data System INTER ELEMENT DATA (FORM No. 9a) Bridge Name BSN Direction INTER ELEMENT NO. OF Influence Lines YPosition Moment Coefficient Axial Force Coefficient m knm/kn kn/kn PREPARED: DATE: / / CHECKED: DATE: / / INTER Element Data August 2009 Structural Input Form No. 9a
Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge
Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB), 34 (1) (26) 1-14 Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge Tanvir Manzur and Alamgir Habib Department of Civil Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology Abutment A retaining wall supporting the ends of a bridge, and, in general, retaining or supporting the approach embankment. Approach The part of the bridge that carries
Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges
7.7 Truss bridges Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges Truss Girders, lattice girders or open web girders are efficient and economical structural systems, since the members experience
How To Write An Analysis System For Bridge Test
Study of Analysis System for Bridge Test Chen Ke, Lu Jian-Ming, Research Institute of Highway, 100088, Beijing, China ([email protected], [email protected]) Summary Analysis System for Bridge Test (Chinese
FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1
FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1 4. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION The analysis of bridges and structures is a mixture of science and engineering judgment. In most cases, use simple models with
Delineation. Section 4 Longitudinal markings
Delineation Section 4 Longitudinal markings The delineation guidelines have been developed to assist in designing and maintaining a quality delineation system. The guidelines are to comprise 19 sections
DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,
DESIGN OF SLABS Dr. G. P. Chandradhara Professor of Civil Engineering S. J. College of Engineering Mysore 1. GENERAL A slab is a flat two dimensional planar structural element having thickness small compared
Load Testing and In-service Monitoring of Transversely Stressed Deck Unit Bridges
Load Testing and In-service Monitoring of Transversely Stressed Deck Unit Bridges N.S. Ngo, T. Pape & R.P. Kotze ARRB Group Ltd, Australia R.W. Pritchard Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads,
The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.
9.2 One-way Slabs This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis and Design 9.2.1 Introduction Slabs are an important structural component where prestressing is applied. With increase
Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges
Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges Douglas R. Heath P.E., Structural Engineer Corey Richard P.E., Project Manager AECOM Overview Bridge Testing/Rating
Preliminary steel concrete composite bridge design charts for Eurocodes
Preliminary steel concrete composite bridge 90 Rachel Jones Senior Engineer Highways & Transportation Atkins David A Smith Regional Head of Bridge Engineering Highways & Transportation Atkins Abstract
MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS
MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS This is the second tutorial on bending of beams. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises.
Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs. Bridge Engineering 1
Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs Bridge Engineering 1 Basic types of bridge decks In-situ reinforced concrete deck- (most common type) Pre-cast concrete deck (minimize the use of local labor) Open steel grid
3.1 Historical Considerations
3. Recommended Scope of Bridge improvements 3.1 Historical Considerations In the fall of 2000, an outside consultant, Fraser Design, suggested that the existing 4 th St. Bridge is potentially eligible
Evaluation of Bridge Performance and Rating through Nondestructive
Evaluation of Bridge Performance and Rating through Nondestructive Load Testing Final Report Prepared by: Andrew Jeffrey, Sergio F. Breña, and Scott A.Civjan University of Massachusetts Amherst Department
Numerical Analysis of the Moving Formwork Bracket Stress during Construction of a Curved Continuous Box Girder Bridge with Variable Width
Modern Applied Science; Vol. 9, No. 6; 2015 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Numerical Analysis of the Moving Formwork Bracket Stress during Construction
MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.
MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTOIAL 1 STESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING This is the first tutorial on bending of beams designed for anyone wishing to study it at a fairly advanced level. You should judge
APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP 12-79 PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS
APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP 12-79 PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS This appendix summarizes the criteria applied for the design of new hypothetical bridges considered in NCHRP 12-79 s Task 7 parametric
A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.
Design Step 4 Design Step 4.1 DECK SLAB DESIGN In addition to designing the deck for dead and live loads at the strength limit state, the AASHTO-LRFD specifications require checking the deck for vehicular
Recitation #5. Understanding Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagrams
Recitation #5 Understanding Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagrams Shear force and bending moment are examples of interanl forces that are induced in a structure when loads are applied to that structure.
Storm Drainage Systems 11.9-1
Storm Drainage Systems 11.9-1 11.9 Gutter Flow Calculations 11.9.1 Introduction Gutter flow calculations are necessary in order to relate the quantity of flow (Q) in the curbed channel to the spread of
REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, March 1-4, 2012, Tokyo, Japan REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE
SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:
Reading Assignment SLAB DESIGN Chapter 9 of Text and, Chapter 13 of ACI318-02 Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems: 13.6.1 Direct Design Method (DDM) For slab systems
SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED
SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design, it is preferable to draw moment diagrams
16. Beam-and-Slab Design
ENDP311 Structural Concrete Design 16. Beam-and-Slab Design Beam-and-Slab System How does the slab work? L- beams and T- beams Holding beam and slab together University of Western Australia School of Civil
ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P
ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P This material is duplicated in the Mechanical Principles module H2 and those
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PART 8000 - PRECAST CONCRETE TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Number Page 8100 PRECAST CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION - GENERAL 8-3 8101 General
Overhang Bracket Loading. Deck Issues: Design Perspective
Deck Issues: Design Perspective Overhang Bracket Loading Deck overhangs and screed rails are generally supported on cantilever brackets during the deck pour These brackets produce an overturning couple
National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination
Structural Effective Beginning with the April 2011 The structural engineering exam is a breadth and exam examination offered in two components on successive days. The 8-hour Vertical Forces (Gravity/Other)
Prestressed Concrete I-Beam and TxGirder Haunch Design Guide
Prestressed Concrete I-Beam and TxGirder Haunch Design Guide Components of the Haunch Camber: Camber is the upward deflection in the beam after release of the prestressing strands due to the eccentricity
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
Graphic User Interface Graphic User Interface Modeling Features Bridge Applications Segmental Bridges Cable Bridges Analysis Features Result Evaluation Design Features 02 07 13 17 28 34 43 48 2 User Interface
Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July 2012. Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam
Design of Bridges Introduction 3 rd to 4 th July 2012 1 FUNCTION OF A BRIDGE To connect two communities which are separated by streams, river, valley, or gorge, etc. 2 EVOLUTION OF BRIDGES 1. Log Bridge
Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993
Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993 Abstract: This Technical Notes is a design aid for the Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures (ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402-92) and Specifications
BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are
Chapter 10 Bridges Chapter 10 Bridges Bridg Bridges -- usually the best, but most expensive drainage crossing structure. Protect bridges against scour. BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are the
Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains
Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains Doug Jenkins 1, Chris Lawson 2 1 Interactive Design Services, 2 Reinforced
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 3279 SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP Yuming DING 1, Bruce HAMERSLEY 2 SUMMARY Vancouver
Rail Track Analysis User Manual. LUSAS Version 15.0 : Issue 1
Rail Track Analysis User Manual LUSAS Version 15.0 : Issue 1 LUSAS Forge House, 66 High Street, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 1HN, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 8541 1999 Fax +44 (0)20 8549 9399 Email:
CAPPELEN MEMORIAL BRIDGE REHABILITATION
CAPPELEN MEMORIAL BRIDGE REHABILITATION Owner: Hennepin County Engineering: HNTB with Olson-Nesvold Engineering (ONE) and others Section 106 Historical Committee: Hennepin County, MnDOT Cultural Resources
Reinforced Concrete Slab Design Using the Empirical Method
Reinforced Concrete Slab Design Using the Empirical Method BridgeSight Solutions for the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications BridgeSight Software TM Creators of effective and reliable solutions for
9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I)
9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I) This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis and Design Features in Modeling and Analysis Distribution of Moments to Strips 9.3.1 Introduction The slabs are
REHABILITATION OF THE FIGUEIRA DA FOZ BRIDGE
REHABILITATION OF THE FIGUEIRA DA FOZ BRIDGE A.Rito Proponte, Lda, Lisbon, Portugal J. Appleton A2P Consult, Lda, Lisbon, Portugal ABSTRACT: The Figueira da Foz Bridge includes a 405 m long cable stayed
DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
DESIGN OF SLABS Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Introduction Types of Slab Slabs are plate elements
Guidelines for Writing Reports in Engineering Engineering Faculty, Monash University
Guidelines for Writing Reports in Engineering Engineering Faculty, Monash University Key features of reports Reports: are designed for quick and easy communication of information are designed for selective
Analysis of the Interstate 10 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina
Analysis of the Interstate 0 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina By Genda Chen, Emitt C. Witt III, David Hoffman, Ronaldo Luna, and Adam Sevi The Interstate 0 Twin Span Bridge over Lake Pontchartrain
DESIGN: (SUBSTRUCTURES, SPECIAL STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS) PART 12 BD 31/01 THE DESIGN OF BURIED CONCRETE BOX AND PORTAL FRAME STRUCTURES SUMMARY
DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES VOLUME 2 SECTION 2 HIGHWAY STRUCTURE DESIGN: (SUBSTRUCTURES, SPECIAL STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS) SPECIAL STRUCTURES PART 12 BD 31/01 THE DESIGN OF BURIED CONCRETE BOX
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE INSPECTION PROGRAM CODING GUIDE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE INSPECTION PROGRAM CODING GUIDE BRAGI Bridge Reporting for Appraisal & Greater Inventory Volume III: Other INDOT Items November 2011 Item Number Item Name BRAGI
REPAIR AND STRENGTHENING OF HISTORICAL CONCRETE BRIDGE OVER VENTA RIVER IN LATVIA
1 REPAIR AND STRENGTHENING OF HISTORICAL CONCRETE BRIDGE OVER VENTA RIVER IN LATVIA Verners Straupe, M.sc.eng., Rudolfs Gruberts, dipl. eng. JS Celuprojekts, Murjanu St. 7a, Riga, LV 1024, Latvia e-mail:
Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC 2015 - October 27, 2015 Session 26
2014 HDR Architecture, 2014 2014 HDR, HDR, Inc., all all rights reserved. Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC 2015 - October 27, 2015 Session 26 Brandon Chavel, PhD, P.E.,
Design Manual to BS8110
Design Manual to BS8110 February 2010 195 195 195 280 280 195 195 195 195 195 195 280 280 195 195 195 The specialist team at LinkStudPSR Limited have created this comprehensive Design Manual, to assist
Quality Control and Quality Assurance Guide
Quality Control and Quality Assurance Guide Bridge Division, Design Section October 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1 About this Guide... 3 Chapter 2 Goals and Objectives... 5 Chapter 3 Participants...
LOAD TESTING FOR BRIDGE RATING: DEAN S MILL OVER HANNACROIS CREEK
REPORT FHWA/NY/SR-06/147 LOAD TESTING FOR BRIDGE RATING: DEAN S MILL OVER HANNACROIS CREEK OSMAN HAG-ELSAFI JONATHAN KUNIN SPECIAL REPORT 147 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUREAU New York State
CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE
CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE 9.1 INTRODUCTION An important reason that composite piles have not gained wide acceptance in the civil engineering practice is the lack of a long
Bridge Type Selection
Bridge Type Selection The major consideration for bridge type selection for bridges on the State Aid system is initial cost. Future maintenance costs, construction time, and location are considered when
PART B: LOCATION REFERENCING P ART B: METHOD LOCATION REFERENCING METHOD
PART B: LOCATION REFERENCING P ART B: METHOD LOCATION REFERENCING METHOD Manual No. SM051 B-1 RECORDING A ROUTE POSITION Overview This chapter explains how the location referencing signs, described in
3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options
3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options 3.1 Introduction This chapter describes possible options that rehabilitate and enhance the existing Tappan Zee Bridge. Four Rehabilitation Options have been developed:
Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures
Chapter 8 Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures 8.1 Scope Provisions of Sec. 8.1 and 8.2 of Chapter 8 shall apply for detailing of reinforcement in reinforced concrete members, in general. For
REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a
1-a WINONA BRIDGE (BRIDGE 5900) REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a Rehab option 1-a is a rehabilitation package whereby all spans of the existing structure would be rehabilitated to the degree feasible and strengthened
IN-SERVICE PERFORMANCE AND BEHAVIOR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE HYBRID COMPOSITE BRIDGE SYSTEM A CASE STUDY
IN-SERVICE PERFORMANCE AND BEHAVIOR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE HYBRID COMPOSITE BRIDGE SYSTEM A CASE STUDY John M. Civitillo University of Virginia, USA Devin K. Harris University of Virginia, USA Amir Gheitasi
HIGHWAY STRUCTURES: INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PART 4 BA 16/97 AMENDMENT NO.2 THE ASSESSMENT OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES SUMMARY
DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES VOLUME 3 SECTION 4 HIGHWAY STRUCTURES: INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT PART 4 BA 16/97 AMENDMENT NO.2 THE ASSESSMENT OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES SUMMARY
Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 163-167 (2011) pp 1147-1156 Online available since 2010/Dec/06 at www.scientific.net (2011) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.163-167.1147
(1) Minami Nagamachi and Naka Nagamachi viaducts between Shiraishi Zao and Sendai Stations on the Tohoku Shinkansen line
Report by the First Joint Survey Team of the JSCE Concrete and Structural Engineering Committees on the damage caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake April 5, 2011 (First Report) 1. Survey team members
~iffiui ~ Bridge Condition Survey. Inspection Date: 21 May 2003 District: San Angelo County: Tom Green Highway:
Texas Depadment of Transpo,tation Bridge Condition Survey Inspection Date: 21 May 2003 District: San Angelo County: Tom Green Highway: Irving Street Facility Name: Lone Wolf Bridge Structure Number: B00315-031
US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study
US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study ITEM NOS. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00 Prepared by: Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 9750 Ormsby Station Rd Louisville, KY 40223 August 16, 2013 Table of Contents
EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES
EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES Yang-Cheng Wang Associate Professor & Chairman Department of Civil Engineering Chinese Military Academy Feng-Shan 83000,Taiwan Republic
AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Training. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrDR 6.6)
AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Training STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrDR 6.6) Last Modified: 4/28/2015 STL8-1 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.5 AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Training STL8 Single Span
PART 6 HA 113/05 DRAINAGE
DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES VOLUME 4 SECTION 2 GEOTECHNICS AND DRAINAGE DRAINAGE PART 6 HA 113/5 COMBINED CHANNEL AND PIPE SYSTEM FOR SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE SUMMARY This Advice Note gives guidance
Evaluation and Field Load Testing of Timber Railroad Bridge
Transportation Research Record 1696 Paper No. 5B0112 323 Evaluation and Field Load Testing of Timber Railroad Bridge Terry J. Wipf, Michael A. Ritter, and Douglas L. Wood Several spans of a 60-year-old
INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE.
INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE. M.Sc. Gediminas Viršilas Head of Bridge Division, Lithuanian Road Administration Working group 2 of PIARC Technical Committee
Overdimension vehicles and loads
Overdimension vehicles and loads Factsheet 53 June 2013 ISSN 1172-0689 (print) ISSN 1172-0778 (online) THIS FACTSHEET summarises the overdimension requirements of the Land Transport Rule: Vehicle Dimensions
Problem 1: Computation of Reactions. Problem 2: Computation of Reactions. Problem 3: Computation of Reactions
Problem 1: Computation of Reactions Problem 2: Computation of Reactions Problem 3: Computation of Reactions Problem 4: Computation of forces and moments Problem 5: Bending Moment and Shear force Problem
SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:
SEISMIC DESIGN Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading: 1. Seismic Performance Category (SPC), varies from A to E, depending on how the
In-situ Load Testing to Evaluate New Repair Techniques
In-situ Load Testing to Evaluate New Repair Techniques W.J. Gold 1 and A. Nanni 2 1 Assistant Research Engineer, Univ. of Missouri Rolla, Dept. of Civil Engineering 2 V&M Jones Professor, Univ. of Missouri
Analysis of the Response Under Live Loads of Two New Cable Stayed Bridges Built in Mexico
Analysis of the Response Under Live Loads of Two New Cable Stayed Bridges Built in Mexico Roberto Gómez, Raul Sánchez-García, J.A. Escobar and Luis M. Arenas-García Abstract In this paper we study the
GUARDRAIL INNOVATION FLOWS FROM HERE
INNOVATION FLOWS FROM HERE ENSURING SAFETY ON CANADIAN HIGHWAYS The economics, versatility, and performance of Guardrail surpass all other roadside barrier systems. Guardrail provides highly-visible protection
Long-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations
Design Step 7.1 INTEGRAL ABUTMENT DESIGN General considerations and common practices Integral abutments are used to eliminate expansion joints at the end of a bridge. They often result in Jointless Bridges
Chapter Forty-seven. RURAL TWO-LANE/MULTILANE STATE HIGHWAYS (New Construction/Reconstruction) BUREAU OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT MANUAL
Chapter Forty-seven RURAL TWO-LANE/MULTILANE STATE HIGHWAYS (New Construction/Reconstruction) BUREAU OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT MANUAL Illinois RURAL TWO-LANE/MULTILANE STATE HIGHWAYS December 2009 2 Illinois
Open House Public Meeting for the Thurmond Bridge Rehabilitation Project State Project: State Project S310-25/2-0.10 Federal Project: BR-0252(001)D
Open House Public Meeting for the State Project: State Project S310-25/2-0.10 Federal Project: BR-0252(001)D May 7, 2015 Old Glen Jean Bank Glean Jean, WV 4:00-7:00 PM www.transportation.wv.gov PROJECT
CHAPTER 6 CONSTRUCTION TYPES
CHAPTER 6 CONSTRUCTION TYPES SECTION 601 GENERAL 601.1 Scope. Provisions of this chapter shall govern the classification of construction type by materials and fire resistance of its elements and the use
Weekly Income $ Deposit Saved $ LQ House Price $ Interest rate % Weekly pymt $ Index % April 2016 1,424.64 64,507 427,500 4.45 492.37 34.
19 May 2016 First home buyer affordability in Tauranga The interest.co.nz first home buyer index for April 2016: Household income is a key criteria for lending institutions. We have established a set of
Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project
Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Project WV Department of Transportation Division of Highways in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration State Project S310-13-0.02 00 Federal
HYLINER AKS HDPE LINING
HYLINER AKS HDPE LINING FOR CONCRETE PIPE Manufactured from HDPE Available in white and black Sheets up to 3 m width D1.12 HyLiner AKS HDPE Lining for Concrete Pipe October 2013 0800 WE PIPE (93 7473)
The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study. Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc.
The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc. March 22, 2010 Replacement vs. Rehabilitation Project Background Introduction
MILMAN & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ PROJECT MANAGERS
MILMAN & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ PROJECT MANAGERS May 29, 2013 Revision B Structural Guideline for Design and Installation Holes in Composite Floor Slab Terminal 3, Departure Level
INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS
CHAPTER Structural Steel Design LRFD Method INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS Third Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Part II Structural Steel Design and Analysis
21 August 2015 Interest.co.nz Home loan affordability in New Zealand
21 August 2015 Interest.co.nz Home loan affordability in The interest.co.nz home loan affordability index for July 2015: Based on our standard household profile, it now takes 40.3% of the median take home
REHABILITATION OF CONCRETE BEAM BRIDGES IN CROATIAN STATE ROAD NETWORK
REHABILITATION OF CONCRETE BEAM BRIDGES IN CROATIAN STATE Danijel Tenžera, Krešimir Futivić, Boris Ukrainczyk Summary Bridge structures deteriorate with years of use and exposure to adverse environmental
I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation
I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation Fall Asphalt Conference Richmond, VA David Shiells, P.E. Virginia Department of Transportation David White Superior Paving Corporation October 2, 2012 Project Location 2 Goal
Steel and composite bridges in Germany State of the Art
Steel and composite bridges in Germany State of the Art Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. G. Hanswille Institute for Steel and Composite Structures University of Wuppertal Germany Univ.-Prof. em. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c.
BEAMS: SHEAR FLOW, THIN WALLED MEMBERS
LECTURE BEAMS: SHEAR FLOW, THN WALLED MEMBERS Third Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 15 Chapter 6.6 6.7 by Dr. brahim A. Assakkaf SPRNG 200 ENES
19 May 2016 Interest.co.nz Home loan affordability in Dunedin
19 May 2016 Interest.co.nz Home loan affordability in Dunedin The interest.co.nz home loan affordability index for April 2016: Based on our standard household profile, it now takes 28.0% of the median
Modeling Beams on Elastic Foundations Using Plate Elements in Finite Element Method
Modeling Beams on Elastic Foundations Using Plate Elements in Finite Element Method Yun-gang Zhan School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang,
Elevated Roads for Sri Lanka
Elevated Roads for Sri Lanka M.T.R. Jayasinghe (Senior Professor, Structural Engineering, University of Moratuwa) Senior Professor M.T.R. Jayasinghe is a Professor of Structural Engineering, University
TECHNICAL USER MANUAL for STANDARD HALF THROUGH UNDERBRIDGES Z TYPE
NR/CIV/TUM/1200 Rev D May 2010 TECHNICAL USER MANUAL for STANDARD HALF THROUGH UNDERBRIDGES Z TYPE Standard Detail and Design Drawings Page 1 of 38 NR/CIV/TUM/1200 Rev D May 2010 Summary This technical
FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE
County: Any Design: BRG Date: 10/007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 10/007 FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE Design: Based on AASHTO LRFD 007 Specifications, TxDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual, and TxDOT Project 0-4371
Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars
Report on Wind Resistance of Signs supported by Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars Prepared for US Sign and Fabrication Corporation January, 2006 SUMMARY This study found the attachment of
8.2 Elastic Strain Energy
Section 8. 8. Elastic Strain Energy The strain energy stored in an elastic material upon deformation is calculated below for a number of different geometries and loading conditions. These expressions for
Index 20010 Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12)
Index 20010 Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12) Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th Edition; Structures Detailing Manual (SDM); Structures Design Guidelines (SDG)
Emergency repair of Bridge B421
Emergency repair of Bridge B421 over the Olifants River after fl ood damage INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Bridge B421 is located on the R555 at km 5.03 on Section 01E between Witbank (now known as emalahleni)
