Can a LumpSum Transfer Make Everyone Enjoy the Gains. from Free Trade?


 Sherman Butler
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Can a LumpSum Transfer Make Everyone Enjoy te Gains from Free Trade? Yasukazu Icino Department of Economics, Konan University June 30, 2010 Abstract I examine lumpsum transfer rules to redistribute te gains from free trade. Wen individuals anticipate tat free trade policy will come wit a lumpsum transfer, tey are going to cange teir beaviors under autarky in order to get larger transfers. In spite of tis falsi cation, can a lumpsum transfer still make everyone enjoy te gains from free trade? In a model of simple excange economy, I found a condition under wic a lumpsum transfer can make it, but in general it is di cult to acieve Pareto gains from free trade. Key Words: Gains from trade, lumpsum transfer, redistribution JEL Classi cation Numbers: F11, H23 *Address: Okamoto, Higasinadaku Kobe , Japan. 1
2 1 Introduction It is well known tat free trade creates winners and losers. However, wit an appropriate lumpsum transfer, Pareto improvement is acieved as te country moves from autarky to free trade. For example, see Kemp (1962), and Grandmont and McFadden (1972). Essentially, te idea of Paretoimproving lumpsum transfer rules is to let wat eac individual consumed under autarky a ordable under free trade, too. 1 Later, Dixit and Norman (1986) pointed out practical di culties of implementing suc lumpsum transfer rules. In implementing lumpsum transfer to make everyone better o after free trade, te government as to gure out not only wo are taxed and wo are subsidized, but also ow muc is taxed or subsidized for eac individual. To do so, te government needs to collect a lot of information about te caracteristics of individuals. Moreover, wen asked by te government, eac individual may not reveal is caracteristics tat te government is going to use to calculate te amount of transfer. As Dixit and Norman (1986) writes, individuals ave an incentive to manipulate teir beavior so as to mislead te planner about tese caracteristics and secure a larger net transfer. How do tey manipulate teir beavior? Does tat manipulation matter? Wong (1997) studies tese questions in a general setting. His answer to te questions is, it may not matter very muc: e argues tat a lumpsum transfer rule tat allows eac individual to consume under free trade wat tey used to consume under autarky can acieve Pareto gains from free trade, in spite tat consumers manipulate teir beavior. However, partly because e worked on a very general setting, Wong did not analyze weter and ow consumers manipulation of teir beavior a ects te autarkic equilibrium price, and ow te cange in te autarkic equilibrium price will a ect te performance of te lumpsum transfer. In tis paper, I work on a simpler, more speci c setting tan Wong: two goods, quasilinear utility. By doing so, I can analyze weter and ow consumers manipulation of teir beavior in uences te autarkic equilibrium price. Ten, I ask te questions Wong 1 Capter 8 of Wong (1995) as a detailed discussion on tis topic. 2
3 asked: How do consumers manipulate teir beavior? Does tat manipulation matter? 2 Contrary to Wong s, my answer is, it does matter quite. I found tat it is in general di cult to redistribute te gains from free trade to everyone as a country moving from autarky to free trade, if te government cannot observe individuals preferences and if individuals anticipate a lumpsum transfer under free trade. Te reason is as follows. Knowing tat te lumpsum transfer is based on ow muc tey buy and sell under autarky, individuals distort teir consumption under autarky, in order to increase te compensation tey receive from te government or to decrease te lumpsum tax tey ave to pay to te government. Tis results in a drop of te autarkic equilibrium price, wic is likely to make te lumpsum transfer ine ective. Te rest of te paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we set up te model. In Section 3, we investigate weter te traditional lumpsum transfer, a transfer tat guarantees autarkic consumption bundle a ordable under free trade, can redistribute te gains from free trade so as to acieve Pareto improvement even wen consumers are to manipulate teir beavior under autarky. We ten consider a wider range of lumpsum transfer rules in Section 4. Section 5 concludes te paper. 2 Model We consider an excange economy wit two goods, good x and good y, were good y is a numeraire. Tere are H individuals: = 1; 2; :::H. Individual s excess demand for two goods are respectively denoted by x and y. Individual s endowment of good x is denoted by! and tat of good y is denoted by y. In tis model, we ave two periods: in period 0, te economy is under autarky; in period 1, te economy is under free trade. We assume tat te utility function is quasilinear. Individual s utility maximization 2 Ce and Faccini (2007) studies tis kind of manipulation in a context of market liberalization, wile we study te manipulation in te context of trade liberalization. 3
4 problem in period 0 is given by max x ;y u (x +! ) + y + y s.t. px + y 0, were u () is individual s subutility function, wit u 0 () > 0 and u00 () < 0, and p is te price of good x. Solving te rstorder conditions gives te excess demand functions x (! ; p) = u 0 1 (p)! and y (! ; p) = px (! ; p). From te excess demand function, te autarkic equilibrium price p a is de ned by P x (! ; p a ) = 0. Let x a x (! ; p a ) denote te excess demand (or, we call it transaction ) of individual in te autarkic equilibrium. Ten, we can de ne te indirect utility of individual in te autarkic equilibrium: U a U (x a ; pa ) u (x a +! ) p a x a + y. In period 1, wen te country allows free trade, te price of good x is equal to te world price p (we assume te economy is small). Ten, transaction and indirect utility of individual in te freetrade equilibrium are respectively denoted by x x (! ; p ) and U U (x ; p ) u (x +! ) p x + y. We assume tat p < p a. Namely, te world price of good x is smaller tan te autarky price. 2.1 Gains from trade falls unequally In aggregate, tere are gains from free trade: P U P U a = P = P [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] + P [U (x a ; p ) U (x a ; pa )] [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] + (p a p ) P x a > 0 since te rst term is positive (given p, te utility maximizing consumption is x ) and te second term is zero because P xa = 0. However, te gains from trade do not fall equally to everyone. Te buyers of good x 4
5 gain from free trade: U U a = [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] + [U (x a ; p ) U (x a ; pa )] = [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] + (p a p ) x a > 0, provided x a > 0 (i.e., individual is a buyer under autarky). On te oter and, te sellers of good x lose from free trade: U U a = [U (x ; p ) U (x ; pa )] + [U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )] = (p a p ) x + [U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )] < 0, provided tat x < 0 (i.e., individual is a seller under free trade). 3 Traditional lumpsum transfer Let te government give some lumpsum transfer in period 1 to make sure tat everyone can enjoy te gains from free trade. Suppose tat te government gives a lumpsum transfer z a = (pa p ) x a to individual in period 1 (note tat za > 0 is a subsidy and z a < 0 is a tax). Ten, te budget constraint of individual in period 1 becomes p x + y z a. It is easy to sow tat tis transfer makes (xa ; ya ) a ordable under p : p x + y z a, p x + y (p a p ) x a, p x + y p x a + ya : Terefore, wit tis transfer, everyone gets better o by free trade. Tat is, U +za > U a for all. In addition, wit tis lumpsum transfer, te government budget is balanced since P za = (pa p ) P x = Consumption Falsi cation Te discussion above tat te free trade policy wit te lumpsum transfer z a makes everyone better o, owever, depends on an implicit assumption tat te government 5
6 can gure out wat z a s are. For te government to calculate za, it as to know eac individual s utility function and endowments. But tis is not likely te case. Witout knowing preferences and endowments of eac individual, te government is not able to calculate x a, and tus cannot gure out za. Ten, te only way for te government to nd te amount of lumpsum transfer for individual is to observe te transaction made by individual in period 0 (under autarky). However, if eac individual knows tat te government is going to observe is transaction in period 0 to determine te amount of transfer for im, ten e may want to cange is transaction from x a in order to get larger transfer in period 1 (under free trade). We call tis transaction falsi cation. Given tis, te question we want to ask in tis paper is as follows: ow does eac individual falsify is transaction in period 0, and ow does it a ect te equilibrium price in period 0? If te individuals falsify teir transaction in period 0, does tis mean tat Pareto gains from free trade cannot be acieved? To examine tese questions, let us now clarify our setting. As we ave mentioned, in te following analysis te government knows neiter endowments nor preferences of eac individual; te government just observes transaction of eac individual in period 0 (under autarky). In period 0, all individuals know tat free trade will be allowed in period 1. Tey also know tat te lumpsum transfer z = (p p ) x will be given in period 1, were x is te observed transaction of individual in period 0 and p is te prevailing price in period 0. We refer tis form of transfer, z = (p p ) x, as te traditional lumpsum transfer. Notice tat te traditional transfer z = (p p ) x as te same spirit as z a = (pa p ) x a : z makes wat individual consumed in period 0 (under autarky) a ordable in period 1 (under free trade). Also, note tat if tere were no transaction falsi cation, te traditional lumpsum transfer would be identical to z a in equilibrium. We are going to investigate weter tis traditional lumpsum transfer can redistribute te gains from free trade so as to acieve Pareto improvement, even wen tere is transaction falsi cation. 6
7 Now, te utility maximization problem of individual sould be written as follows: max u (x +! ) + y + y + u (x 1 x ;y ;x 1 +! ) + y 1 + y ;y1 s.t. px + y 0, and p x 1 + y1 (p p ) x were x and y are period0 transaction of good x and y; x 1 and y1 are period1 transaction of good x and y, respectively, and is a discount factor for individual, 0 1 for all. Solving te rstorder conditions, we ave x 1 = x and x = u 0 1 (p + (p p ))!. Here, te period1 transaction is te same as te one we saw in Section 2. But te period0 transaction is now di erent: anticipating tat te transfer will be given in period 1, individual regards te cost of consuming one unit of good x in period 0 not as p but as p + (p p ). Now, let p 0 denote te equilibrium price in period 0 under transaction falsi cation. It is determined by P u0 1 p 0 + p 0 p = P!. How is p 0 di erent from p a? Tat is, ow does transaction falsi cation a ect te equilibrium autarky price? We found te following result. Lemma 1 p < p 0 < p a. Proof. First, compare te individual demand function under nonfalsi cation u 0 1 (p) and under falsi cation u 0 1 (p + (p p )). For any given p, u 0 1 (p) > u 0 1 (p + (p p )), p p > 0, and u 0 1 (p) = u 0 1 (p + (p p )), p p = 0. Since tis is true for all, P u0 1 (p) > P u0 1 (p + (p p )), p p > 0, and P u0 1 (p) = P u0 1 (p + (p p )), p p = 0. Grapically, te demand curve of nonfalsi cation is steeper tan tat of falsi cation, and tey intersect at p (see Figure 1). In oter words, at tose quantities less tan te quantity suc tat P u0 1 (p) = P u0 1 (p + (p p )), te demand curve of nonfalsi cation is above tat of falsi cation. Te equilibrium nonfalsi cation price p a is determined by P u0 1 (p a ) = P! and by assumption p < p a. Tus, te intersection of te aggregate falsi cation demand curve P u0 1 (p + (p p )) and te aggregate supply P!, at wic p 0 is determined, is below te intersection of 7
8 P u0 1 (p) and P!. Terefore, p < p 0 < p a. Wit transaction falsi cation, te equilibrium price in period 0 falls. Intuitively, tis is because sellers try to sell more in period 0 in order to get more subsidy in period 1, and buyers try to buy less in order to lower tax tey ave to pay. Having found te period0 equilibrium price under transaction falsi cation, now we can de ne te period0 equilibrium transaction as x 0 u0 1 p 0 + p 0 p!. Is x 0 larger or smaller tan xa? Namely, wen anticipating te transfer of period 1, is individual going to consume more or less in period 0? Tere are two opposing e ects. To get larger transfer of period 1, an individual wants to buy less (or sell more). Tis e ect tends to make x 0 less tan xa. On te oter and, since good x is now ceaper (p 0 < p a ), an individual wants to buy more (or sell less). Tis e ect tends to make x 0 more tan x a. Wic e ect is dominating depends on. In fact, if everyone as te same discount factor, tese two e ects just cancel eac oter, and te falsi ed transaction x 0 is just equal to te nonfalsi ed transaction xa for all. Lemma 2 x 0 = xa for all, = for all. Proof. (() Suppose tat x 0 < xa for some. Ten, p0 + p 0 p > p a. Since P x0 = P xa, tere must be anoter agent 0 suc tat x 0 0 > x a 0. Tus p p 0 p < p a. However, since = 0, tis is a contradiction. ()) x 0 = xa for all implies p0 + p 0 p = p a for all. Ten, s must be te same for all. Now, let s consider te case were s are di erent. For tose individuals wit large, it olds tat p 0 + p 0 p > p a, and tus x 0 < xa. Tis means tat for tose individuals wit large, securing larger transfer in period 0 is more important tan utilizing te ceaper price in period 0. On te oter and, for tose individuals wit small, it olds tat p 0 + p 0 p < p a, and tus x 0 > xa. 8
9 3.2 Can everyone gain from free trade? We are now ready to answer our main question. Even wen te individuals falsify teir transaction in period 0 in order to a ect te transfer tey receive in period 1, can te traditional lumpsum transfer, wic guarantees te period0 consumption bundle affordable in period 1, still make everyone enjoy te gains from free trade? To see tis, we are going to compare U 0 + (U + z ) wit U a + U a, were U 0 U x 0 ; p0 u (x 0 +! ) p 0 x 0 + y, and z = p 0 p x 0 (ereafter, z is to denote te traditional lumpsum transfer in equilibrium wen tere is transaction falsi cation). Tat is, we are comparing te welfare wen free trade policy comes in period 1 wit te traditional lumpsum transfer under transaction falsi cation, wit te welfare wen te economy stays in autarky in period 1. First, we consider te special case were all individuals ave te same discount factor Wen = for all Proposition 1 If = for all, ten U 0 + (U + z ) = U a + U for all. Proof. [U 0 + (U + z )] [U a + U ] = (U 0 + z ) U a = U (x 0 ; p0 + p 0 p ) U (x a ; pa ) = 0. Te last equality comes from Lemma 2. Terefore, wen =, te traditional lumpsum transfer is completely neutralized. Tat is, even toug te free trade policy in period 1 is accompanied by te lumpsum transfer, te transaction falsi cation in period 0 makes te resulting intertemporal welfare just equal to te one wit free trade policy not accompanied by any transfers. Because of Proposition 1, wen = for all, comparing U 0 + (U + z ) wit U a + U a is reduced to comparing U wit U a. Hence, we readily ave te following corollary. 9
10 Corollary 1 If = for all, ten U 0 + (U + z ) > U a + U a for suc tat x a 0, and U 0 + (U + z ) < U a + U a for suc tat x 0. From free trade, te buyers of good x still gain and te sellers of good x still lose. Wen = for all, due to transaction falsi cation, te traditional lumpsum transfer z = p 0 p x 0 fails to redistribute te gains from free trade to everyone Di erent Next, we consider te cases were s are di erent. Let us examine buyers rst. As we con rm below, in spite of transaction falsi cation, buyers of good x are made better o by free trade wit te lumpsum transfer z = p 0 p x 0. Proposition 2 U 0 + (U + z ) > U a + U a for suc tat xa 0. Proof. [U 0 + (U + z )] [U a + U a ] = U 0 + z U a + (U U a ) = U x 0 ; p0 + p 0 p U x a ; p0 + p 0 p + U x a ; p0 + p 0 p U (x a ; pa ) + [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p ) + U (x a ; p ) U (x a ; pa )] = U x 0 ; p0 + p 0 p U x a ; p0 + p 0 p + [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] + p a p 0 + p 0 p x a + (p a p ) x a = U x 0 ; p0 + p 0 p U x a ; p0 + p 0 p + [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] > 0. + (1 + ) p a p 0 x a How about sellers? Wit te lumpsum transfer, can sellers of good x be made better o by free trade? As we sow in Proposition 3, due to transaction falsi cation, some sellers may be made worse o by free trade even toug tey receive te lumpsum transfer. 10
11 Proposition 3 For suc tat x 0, if is small enoug suc tat p a p 0 + p 0 p, ten U 0 + (U + z ) < U a + U a. Proof. U 0 + (U + z ) [U a + U a ] = U 0 + z U a + (U U a ) = U x 0 ; p0 + p 0 p U x 0 ; pa + U x 0 ; pa U (x a ; pa ) + [U (x ; p ) U (x ; pa ) + U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )] = p a p 0 + p 0 p x 0 + U x 0 ; pa U (x a ; pa ) + (p a p ) x + [U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )] < 0. Note tat x 0 0 for tose suc tat x 0 since p0 > p. Intuitively, tis proposition is explained as follows. Wen a seller of good x as small, because te ceaperprice e ect outweigs te securinglargertransfer e ect, e sells less in period 0 under transaction falsi cation tan under nonfalsi cation. Tus, te lumpsum transfer e receives in period 1 will be smaller. Furtermore, te fall in period 0 price due to transaction falsi cation makes is period0 welfare smaller (because e is a seller of good x). As a result, wen tere is transaction falsi cation, e is made worse o by free trade policy in period 1 even toug te lumpsum transfer is given. Proposition 3 gives us a necessary condition under wic te lumpsum transfer can make everyone better o : te traditional lumpsum transfer successfully redistributes te gains from trade to everyone only if all sellers of good x ave large discount factor so tat p 0 + p 0 p > p a : wit all sellers aving large s, tey sell more in period 0 so as to secure large amount of lumpsum transfer in period 1. As a result tey can be enoug compensated under free trade. In Appendix A, we present an example to demonstrate tat tere is actually a case were everyone is made better o. 11
12 3.3 Discussion So, after all, ow do we evaluate te performance of te traditional lumpsum transfer rule z = p 0 p x 0? Can it successfully redistribute te gains from free trade to everyone, in spite of transaction falsi cation? Our answer is, yes, it can, but not always. Weter tis lumpsum transfer can make everyone better o depends on te distribution of individuals caracteristics. Speci cally, it can make everyone better o only wen all of te sellers of good x (i.e., tose wo ave larger endowment of good x) care about te future more tan te buyers do. How is tis likely to appen? Casually speaking, tere seems no special reason to believe tat te individuals aving larger endowment of good x is more patient tan tose aving smaller endowment. Ten, te situation under wic tis transfer rule makes everyone better o is not specially likely to appen. Moreover, wit te assumption tat te government does not know te preferences of eac individual, it is natural to consider tat te government does not know te discount factor of eac individual eiter. So, te government will not be able to identify te situation were te lumpsum transfer rule works ne. Overall, our conclusion is tat te traditional lumpsum transfer rule z = p 0 p x 0 does not perform very well wen tere is transaction falsi cation. 4 Any linear transfer rules Tus far, we ave examined a particular form of lumpsum transfer, z = p 0 p x 0, because it is a transfer rule tat guarantees te period0 consumption bundle a ordable in period 1. We ave sown tat tis traditional transfer rule does not perform well to redistribute te gains from free trade to everyone. A reason wy tis transfer rule does not work well is tat te amount of transfer is a ected by te autarkic price drop from p a to p 0 due to transaction falsi cation. To avoid tis, we may want to look for oter rules of lumpsum transfer. For example, ow about z = (p a p ) x? Wit tis rule, te amount of transfer is not directly a ected by te autarkic price cange. To analyze suc a transfer rule, in tis section, we consider a more 12
13 general class of lumpsum transfer rules. Speci cally, we examine a class of transfer rules tat are budget balancing and linear in x. A budgetbalancing, linear lumpsum transfer rule is denoted by z (x ) = sx, were s can be a constant, or it can be a function of te autarkic price p, as in te case of te traditional transfer rule. So, wen necessary, we write s (p). Are tere any linear transfer rules tat outperform te traditional transfer rule z = p 0 p x 0? Tis is te question we ask in tis section. As we will see below, te answer to tis question is essentially no. Basically, any linear transfer rules ave te similar caracteristics to te traditional lumpsum transfer rule we ave studied in te last section. Wit a general linear lumpsum transfer, te utility maximization problem is written as follows: max u (x +! ) + y + y + u (x 1 x ;y ;x 1 +! ) + y 1 + y ;y1 s.t. px + y 0, and p x 1 + y1 sx Tis setting is exactly te same as te one we ad in Section 3.1, except (p p ) x is replaced by sx. Solving te rstorder conditions, we derive x 1 = x and x = u 0 1 (p s)!. Te equilibrium autarky price p 0 is determined by P u0 1 p 0 s p 0 = P!. We let x 0 denote te equilibrium transaction in period 0: x0 = u0 1 p 0 s p 0!. Ten, in equilibrium, te lumpsum transfer is z x 0 = s p 0 x Wen = for all Now, we can sow tat te same lemma olds as in te case of te traditional transfer. Lemma 3 Let z x 0 = sx 0. x 0 = xa for all, = for all. Proof. (() Suppose tat x 0 < xa for some. Ten, p0 s p 0 > p a. Since P x0 = P xa, tere must be anoter agent 0 suc tat x 0 0 > x a 0. Tus p 0 0s p 0 < p a. However, since = 0, tis is a contradiction. 13
14 ()) x 0 = xa for all implies p0 s p 0 = p a for all. Ten, it must be tat are te same for all. Using tis lemma, again, we can sow tat any linear transfer rules are neutralized wen = for all. Proposition 4 Let z x 0 = sx 0. If = for all, ten U 0 + (U + z ) = U a + U for all. Proof. U 0 + U + z x0 = U 0 + z x0 U a (U a + U ) = U x 0 ; p0 s U (x a ; pa ) = 0. Terefore, any linear and budgetbalancing transfer rules cannot make everyone better o wen everyone as te same discount factor. 4.2 Wen s are di erent So, again, to see if linear transfers work well, we ave to look at te cases were s are di erent. Before doing tis, let us take a closer look at ow te caracteristics of te linear lumpsum transfer rules z x 0 = s p 0 x 0 a ect te equilibrium autarkic price p0. Lemma 4 sows tat as long as te transfer is positive for sellers (subsidy for sellers) and negative for buyers (tax on buyers), i.e., s p 0 0, te equilibrium autarkic price falls due to transaction falsi cation. Ten, Lemma 5 sows tat as long as te size of transfer is not too large, te equilibrium autarkic price p 0 is iger tan te world price. Lemma 4 p 0 p a, s p
15 Proof. (() Suppose p 0 > p a. s p 0 0 implies p 0 s p 0 > p 0 for all. Ten, p 0 s p 0 > p 0 > p a for all. Tis implies x 0 < xa for all. But tis is a contradiction since P x0 = P xa. ()) Suppose p 0 p a. s p 0 > 0 implies p 0 > p 0 s p 0. Ten, p a p 0 > p 0 s p 0 for all. Tis implies x a < x0 for all, but tis is a contradiction. Lemma 5 If 0 s p 0 p a p, ten p p 0 p a. Proof. Note tat s p 0 0 implies p 0 p a from Lemma 4. Given tat p a p s p 0, we ave p 0 p p 0 s p 0 p a p 0 s p 0 p a, were = max. Since p 0 s p 0 p a (oterwise, x 0 > xa for all, wic cannot appen), it olds tat p 0 p. Having tese lemmas, we can sow te following: te results we ave derived in te case of te traditional transfer (Section 3) is generalized to te case of any linear transfer rules, provided tat te transfer is positive (subsidy) for sellers and negative (tax) for buyers, and its size is not too large. Proposition 5 Let z x 0 = sx 0 and suppose tat 0 s p 0 p a p. (1) For suc tat x a > 0, U 0 + (U + z ) > U a + U a. (2) For suc tat x 0, if pa p 0 s (i.e., if is relatively small), ten U 0 + (U + z ) < U a + U a. Proof. (1) For tose individuals suc tat x a > 0, [U 0 + (U + z )] [U a + U a ] = U x 0 ; p0 s U x a ; p0 s + U x a ; p0 s U (x a ; pa ) + [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p ) + U (x a ; p ) U (x a ; pa )] = U x 0 ; p0 s U x a ; p0 s + [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] > 0 + p a p 0 + ((p a p ) + s) x a 15
16 since p a p s by assumption and p a p 0 by Lemma 4. (2) For tose individuals suc tat x 0, U 0 + (U + z ) [U a + U a ] = U x 0 ; p0 s U x 0 ; pa + U x 0 ; pa U (x a ; pa ) + [U (x ; p ) U (x ; pa ) + U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )] = p a p 0 s x 0 + U x 0 ; pa U (x a ; pa ) + (p a p ) x + [U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )] < 0 since p a > p 0 s, and since x 0 x < 0 because of p0 p, wic is from Lemma 5. Tus, te discussion we ad in Section 3.3 applies to any linear transfer rules suc tat 0 s p 0 p a p. Tat is, tese linear transfer rules do not perform well in making everyone enjoy te gains from free trade. It does so only wen all sellers of good x are more patient tan te buyers of good x. In Appendix B, we consider te oter linear transfer rules, suc tat 0 < p a p < s p 0, and tat s p 0 > 0. For tose lumpsum transfer rules, too, weter tey can make everyone better o depends on te distribution of individuals discount factors. Terefore, practically speaking, tose transfer rules, eiter, do not perform well in making everyone enjoy te gains from free trade. 5 Concluding remarks In tis paper, we examined lumpsum transfer rules to redistribute te gains from free trade to everyone. Speci cally, we considered a transfer rule tat makes wat eac individual consumed under autarky a ordable under free trade. Wen individuals anticipate tat free trade policy will come wit tis lumpsum transfer, tey are going to falsify teir transaction under autarky in order to get larger transfer. In spite of tis transaction falsi cation, can tis lumpsum transfer successfully redistribute te gains from free trade 16
17 to everyone? Our answer is, yes, it can, but not always. Weter tis lumpsum transfer can make everyone better o depends on te distribution of individuals caracteristics. More speci cally, it can make everyone better o only wen all of te sellers of good x (i.e., tose wo ave larger endowment of good x) care more about te future tan te buyers do. Te similar result will old for any linear, budgetbalancing transfer rules. Appendix A. An example tat everyone is made better Here we provide an example tat everyone is made better o by free trade policy wit te traditional lumpsum transfer z = p 0 p x 0. Let te subutility function u (! + x ) be quadratic: u (! + x ) = 1 (! + x ) (! + x ) 2. Suppose tat 2 tere are two individuals. Let 1 = 0:05, 2 = 1, 1 = 2 = 1, 1 = 2, 2 = 1,! 1 = 0:249,! 2 = 0:751, and p = 1=4. We can calculate te equilibrium prices as follows: p a = ( ) (! 1 +! 2 ) = 1=3; and ( ) p 0 = ( ) (! 1 +! 2 ) + ( ) p = 0: ( ) + ( ) Te equilibrium consumptions of good x are as follows: x a 1 +! 1 = 1=3; x a 2 +! 2 = 2=3; x 1 +! 1 = 1=2; x 2 +! 2 = 3=4; x 0 1 +! 1 = 0:37195; and x 0 2 +! 2 = 0: Te indirect utilities are: U a 1 = 0: y 1; U a 2 = 0: y 2; U 1 = 0: y 1; U 2 = 0:469 + y 2; U z 2 1 = 0: y 1; and 17
18 U z 2 2 = 0: y 2. In tis case everyone is made better o since: U (U1 + z 1) (U1 a + 1U1 a ) = 0:00270 > 0; and U (U2 + z 2) (U2 a + 2U2 a ) = 0:00044 > 0. B. General linear transfer rules: z = s p 0 x 0 B1. Wen 0 < p a p < s p 0 Since s p 0 < 0, in tis case it olds tat p a > p 0 (See, Lemma 4). For buyers, [U 0 + (U + z )] [U a + U a ] = U x 0 ; p0 s U x a ; p0 s + [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] + (p a p ) p 0 s p a x a. Wen x a 0, a su cient condition for tis to be positive is (p a p ) p 0 s p a. Tis condition is satis ed wen is not too large. For sellers, U 0 + (U + z ) [U a + U a ] = p a p 0 s x 0 + U x 0 ; pa U (x a ; pa ) + (p a p ) x + [U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )]. Wen x 0, a su cient condition for tis to be negative is pa p 0 s x 0 0. Tis is, p a p 0 s and x 0 0, or pa p 0 s and x 0 0. However, te latter one, p a p 0 s and x 0 0, can t appen since pa p 0 s, x a x0 and since 0 > x a. Terefore, a su cient condition for tis to be negative is pa p 0 s and x 0 0. In terms of, tis is tat is small enoug to satisfy p a p 0 s, but not too small to violate x
19 B2. Wen s p 0 > 0 In tis case p a < p 0 by Lemma 4. For buyers, [U 0 + (U + z )] [U a + U a ] = U x 0 ; p0 s U x a ; p0 s + [U (x ; p ) U (x a ; p )] + (p a p ) + p a p 0 s x a. Wen x a 0, a su cient condition for tis to be positive is pa p 0 s. Tis condition is satis ed wen is large enoug. For sellers, U 0 + (U + z ) [U a + U a ] = p a p 0 s x 0 + U x 0 ; pa U (x a ; pa ) + (p a p ) x + [U (x ; pa ) U (x a ; pa )]. Wen x 0, a su cient condition for tis to be negative is pa p 0 s x 0 0. Tis is p a p 0 s and x 0 0, or pa p 0 s and x 0 0. However, again, te latter one, p a p 0 s and x 0 0, can t appen since pa p 0 s, x a x0 and since 0 > xa. Terefore, a su cient condition for tis to be negative is p a p 0 s and x 0 0. In terms of, tis is tat is large enoug to satisfy p a p 0 s, but not too large to violate x
20 References [1] Ce, Jiaua and Giovanni Faccini (2007), Dual Track Reforms: wit and witout Losers, Journal of Public Economics, 91, pp [2] Dixit, Avinas and Victor Norman (1986), Gains from Trade witout LumpSum Compensation, Journal of International Economics, 21, pp [3] Grandmont, J. M., and D. McFadden (1972), A Tecnical Note on Classical Gains from Trade, Journal of International Economics, 2, pp [4] Kemp, Murray C. (1962) Te Gain from International Trade, Economic Journal, 72, pp [5] Wong, Karyiu (1995), International Trade in Goods and Factor Mobility, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [6] Wong, Karyiu (1997), Gains from Trade wit LumpSum Compensation. Japanese Economic Review, 48, pp
21 p ω a p 0 p * p 1 * u ( p + ρ ( p p )) u 1 ( p ) quantity Figure 1: Lemma 1: te equilibrium price in Period 0 (under autarky) 21
Unemployment insurance/severance payments and informality in developing countries
Unemployment insurance/severance payments and informality in developing countries David Bardey y and Fernando Jaramillo z First version: September 2011. Tis version: November 2011. Abstract We analyze
More informationPretrial Settlement with Imperfect Private Monitoring
Pretrial Settlement wit Imperfect Private Monitoring Mostafa Beskar University of New Hampsire JeeHyeong Park y Seoul National University July 2011 Incomplete, Do Not Circulate Abstract We model pretrial
More information2.28 EDGE Program. Introduction
Introduction Te Economic Diversification and Growt Enterprises Act became effective on 1 January 1995. Te creation of tis Act was to encourage new businesses to start or expand in Newfoundland and Labrador.
More informationTangent Lines and Rates of Change
Tangent Lines and Rates of Cange 922005 Given a function y = f(x), ow do you find te slope of te tangent line to te grap at te point P(a, f(a))? (I m tinking of te tangent line as a line tat just skims
More informationOptimal Pricing Strategy for Second Degree Price Discrimination
Optimal Pricing Strategy for Second Degree Price Discrimination Alex O Brien May 5, 2005 Abstract Second Degree price discrimination is a coupon strategy tat allows all consumers access to te coupon. Purcases
More informationStrategic trading in a dynamic noisy market. Dimitri Vayanos
LSE Researc Online Article (refereed) Strategic trading in a dynamic noisy market Dimitri Vayanos LSE as developed LSE Researc Online so tat users may access researc output of te Scool. Copyrigt and Moral
More informationCollege Planning Using Cash Value Life Insurance
College Planning Using Cas Value Life Insurance CAUTION: Te advisor is urged to be extremely cautious of anoter college funding veicle wic provides a guaranteed return of premium immediately if funded
More information2 Limits and Derivatives
2 Limits and Derivatives 2.7 Tangent Lines, Velocity, and Derivatives A tangent line to a circle is a line tat intersects te circle at exactly one point. We would like to take tis idea of tangent line
More informationUnderstanding the Derivative Backward and Forward by Dave Slomer
Understanding te Derivative Backward and Forward by Dave Slomer Slopes of lines are important, giving average rates of cange. Slopes of curves are even more important, giving instantaneous rates of cange.
More informationStrategic trading and welfare in a dynamic market. Dimitri Vayanos
LSE Researc Online Article (refereed) Strategic trading and welfare in a dynamic market Dimitri Vayanos LSE as developed LSE Researc Online so tat users may access researc output of te Scool. Copyrigt
More information7.6 Complex Fractions
Section 7.6 Comple Fractions 695 7.6 Comple Fractions In tis section we learn ow to simplify wat are called comple fractions, an eample of wic follows. 2 + 3 Note tat bot te numerator and denominator are
More informationPretrial Settlement with Imperfect Private Monitoring
Pretrial Settlement wit Imperfect Private Monitoring Mostafa Beskar Indiana University JeeHyeong Park y Seoul National University April, 2016 Extremely Preliminary; Please Do Not Circulate. Abstract We
More informationThe EOQ Inventory Formula
Te EOQ Inventory Formula James M. Cargal Matematics Department Troy University Montgomery Campus A basic problem for businesses and manufacturers is, wen ordering supplies, to determine wat quantity of
More information2.23 Gambling Rehabilitation Services. Introduction
2.23 Gambling Reabilitation Services Introduction Figure 1 Since 1995 provincial revenues from gambling activities ave increased over 56% from $69.2 million in 1995 to $108 million in 2004. Te majority
More informationVerifying Numerical Convergence Rates
1 Order of accuracy Verifying Numerical Convergence Rates We consider a numerical approximation of an exact value u. Te approximation depends on a small parameter, suc as te grid size or time step, and
More informationWhat is Advanced Corporate Finance? What is finance? What is Corporate Finance? Deciding how to optimally manage a firm s assets and liabilities.
Wat is? Spring 2008 Note: Slides are on te web Wat is finance? Deciding ow to optimally manage a firm s assets and liabilities. Managing te costs and benefits associated wit te timing of cas in and outflows
More informationAn inquiry into the multiplier process in ISLM model
An inquiry into te multiplier process in ISLM model Autor: Li ziran Address: Li ziran, Room 409, Building 38#, Peing University, Beijing 00.87,PRC. Pone: (86) 0062763074 Internet Address: jefferson@water.pu.edu.cn
More informationFor Sale By Owner Program. We can help with our for sale by owner kit that includes:
Dawn Coen Broker/Owner For Sale By Owner Program If you want to sell your ome By Owner wy not:: For Sale Dawn Coen Broker/Owner YOUR NAME YOUR PHONE # Look as professional as possible Be totally prepared
More informationDerivatives Math 120 Calculus I D Joyce, Fall 2013
Derivatives Mat 20 Calculus I D Joyce, Fall 203 Since we ave a good understanding of its, we can develop derivatives very quickly. Recall tat we defined te derivative f x of a function f at x to be te
More informationCHAPTER 7. Di erentiation
CHAPTER 7 Di erentiation 1. Te Derivative at a Point Definition 7.1. Let f be a function defined on a neigborood of x 0. f is di erentiable at x 0, if te following it exists: f 0 fx 0 + ) fx 0 ) x 0 )=.
More informationFinite Difference Approximations
Capter Finite Difference Approximations Our goal is to approximate solutions to differential equations, i.e., to find a function (or some discrete approximation to tis function) tat satisfies a given relationsip
More informationComputer Science and Engineering, UCSD October 7, 1999 GoldreicLevin Teorem Autor: Bellare Te GoldreicLevin Teorem 1 Te problem We æx a an integer n for te lengt of te strings involved. If a is an nbit
More information1 Density functions, cummulative density functions, measures of central tendency, and measures of dispersion
Density functions, cummulative density functions, measures of central tendency, and measures of dispersion densityfunctionsintro.tex October, 9 Note tat tis section of notes is limitied to te consideration
More informationDistances in random graphs with infinite mean degrees
Distances in random graps wit infinite mean degrees Henri van den Esker, Remco van der Hofstad, Gerard Hoogiemstra and Dmitri Znamenski April 26, 2005 Abstract We study random graps wit an i.i.d. degree
More informationInstantaneous Rate of Change:
Instantaneous Rate of Cange: Last section we discovered tat te average rate of cange in F(x) can also be interpreted as te slope of a scant line. Te average rate of cange involves te cange in F(x) over
More informationSAMPLE DESIGN FOR THE TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE PROGRAM SURVEY
ASA Section on Survey Researc Metods SAMPLE DESIG FOR TE TERRORISM RISK ISURACE PROGRAM SURVEY G. ussain Coudry, Westat; Mats yfjäll, Statisticon; and Marianne Winglee, Westat G. ussain Coudry, Westat,
More informationDifferentiable Functions
Capter 8 Differentiable Functions A differentiable function is a function tat can be approximated locally by a linear function. 8.. Te derivative Definition 8.. Suppose tat f : (a, b) R and a < c < b.
More informationGovernment Debt and Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policy
Government Debt and Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policy Klaus Adam Manneim University and CEPR  preliminary version  June 7, 21 Abstract How do di erent levels of government debt a ect te optimal conduct
More informationTRADING AWAY WIDE BRANDS FOR CHEAP BRANDS. Swati Dhingra London School of Economics and CEP. Online Appendix
TRADING AWAY WIDE BRANDS FOR CHEAP BRANDS Swati Dingra London Scool of Economics and CEP Online Appendix APPENDIX A. THEORETICAL & EMPIRICAL RESULTS A.1. CES and Logit Preferences: Invariance of Innovation
More informationMath 113 HW #5 Solutions
Mat 3 HW #5 Solutions. Exercise.5.6. Suppose f is continuous on [, 5] and te only solutions of te equation f(x) = 6 are x = and x =. If f() = 8, explain wy f(3) > 6. Answer: Suppose we ad tat f(3) 6. Ten
More informationIntroduction. Agents have preferences over the two goods which are determined by a utility function. Speci cally, type 1 agents utility is given by
Introduction General equilibrium analysis looks at how multiple markets come into equilibrium simultaneously. With many markets, equilibrium analysis must take explicit account of the fact that changes
More informationDynamic Competitive Insurance
Dynamic Competitive Insurance Vitor Farina Luz June 26, 205 Abstract I analyze longterm contracting in insurance markets wit asymmetric information and a finite or infinite orizon. Risk neutral firms
More informationReferendumled Immigration Policy in the Welfare State
Referendumled Immigration Policy in te Welfare State YUJI TAMURA Department of Economics, University of Warwick, UK First version: 12 December 2003 Updated: 16 Marc 2004 Abstract Preferences of eterogeneous
More informationAnalyzing the Effects of Insuring Health Risks:
Analyzing te Effects of Insuring Healt Risks: On te Tradeoff between Sort Run Insurance Benefits vs. Long Run Incentive Costs Harold L. Cole University of Pennsylvania and NBER Soojin Kim University of
More informationLecture 10: What is a Function, definition, piecewise defined functions, difference quotient, domain of a function
Lecture 10: Wat is a Function, definition, piecewise defined functions, difference quotient, domain of a function A function arises wen one quantity depends on anoter. Many everyday relationsips between
More informationWelfare, financial innovation and self insurance in dynamic incomplete markets models
Welfare, financial innovation and self insurance in dynamic incomplete markets models Paul Willen Department of Economics Princeton University First version: April 998 Tis version: July 999 Abstract We
More informationM(0) = 1 M(1) = 2 M(h) = M(h 1) + M(h 2) + 1 (h > 1)
Insertion and Deletion in VL Trees Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of te Requirements for Dr. Eric Kaltofen s 66621: nalysis of lgoritms by Robert McCloskey December 14, 1984 1 ackground ccording to Knut
More informationFree Shipping and Repeat Buying on the Internet: Theory and Evidence
Free Sipping and Repeat Buying on te Internet: eory and Evidence Yingui Yang, Skander Essegaier and David R. Bell 1 June 13, 2005 1 Graduate Scool of Management, University of California at Davis (yiyang@ucdavis.edu)
More informationSchedulability Analysis under Graph Routing in WirelessHART Networks
Scedulability Analysis under Grap Routing in WirelessHART Networks Abusayeed Saifulla, Dolvara Gunatilaka, Paras Tiwari, Mo Sa, Cenyang Lu, Bo Li Cengjie Wu, and Yixin Cen Department of Computer Science,
More informationImproved dynamic programs for some batcing problems involving te maximum lateness criterion A P M Wagelmans Econometric Institute Erasmus University Rotterdam PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam Te Neterlands
More informationFinite Volume Discretization of the Heat Equation
Lecture Notes 3 Finite Volume Discretization of te Heat Equation We consider finite volume discretizations of te onedimensional variable coefficient eat equation, wit Neumann boundary conditions u t x
More information2.13 Solid Waste Management. Introduction. Scope and Objectives. Conclusions
Introduction Te planning and delivery of waste management in Newfoundland and Labrador is te direct responsibility of municipalities and communities. Te Province olds overall responsibility for te development
More informationIn their classic textbook, Musgrave and Musgrave (1989)
Integrating Expenditure and Tax Decisions Integrating Expenditure and Tax Decisions: Te Marginal Cost of Funds and te Marginal Benefit of Projects Abstract  Tis paper seeks to clarify te extent to wic
More informationResearch on the Antiperspective Correction Algorithm of QR Barcode
Researc on te Antiperspective Correction Algoritm of QR Barcode Jianua Li, YiWen Wang, YiJun Wang,Yi Cen, Guoceng Wang Key Laboratory of Electronic Tin Films and Integrated Devices University of Electronic
More informationClass Notes, Econ 8801 Lump Sum Taxes are Awesome
Class Notes, Econ 8801 Lump Sum Taxes are Awesome Larry E. Jones 1 Exchange Economies with Taxes and Spending 1.1 Basics 1) Assume that there are n goods which can be consumed in any nonnegative amounts;
More information1.6. Analyse Optimum Volume and Surface Area. Maximum Volume for a Given Surface Area. Example 1. Solution
1.6 Analyse Optimum Volume and Surface Area Estimation and oter informal metods of optimizing measures suc as surface area and volume often lead to reasonable solutions suc as te design of te tent in tis
More informationSocial longterm care insurance with twosided altruism
IDEI  852 July 2015 Social longterm care insurance wit twosided altruism Helmut Cremer, Pierre Pestieau, Kerstin Roeder 7 Social longterm care insurance wit twosided altruism 1 Helmut Cremer 2, Pierre
More informationA strong credit score can help you score a lower rate on a mortgage
NET GAIN Scoring points for your financial future AS SEEN IN USA TODAY S MONEY SECTION, JULY 3, 2007 A strong credit score can elp you score a lower rate on a mortgage By Sandra Block Sales of existing
More informationAn Interest Rate Model
An Interest Rate Model Concepts and Buzzwords Building Price Tree from Rate Tree Lognormal Interest Rate Model Nonnegativity Volatility and te Level Effect Readings Tuckman, capters 11 and 12. Lognormal
More informationSAT Math MustKnow Facts & Formulas
SAT Mat MustKnow Facts & Formuas Numbers, Sequences, Factors Integers:..., 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3,... Rationas: fractions, tat is, anyting expressabe as a ratio of integers Reas: integers pus rationas
More informationChapter 10: Refrigeration Cycles
Capter 10: efrigeration Cycles Te vapor compression refrigeration cycle is a common metod for transferring eat from a low temperature to a ig temperature. Te above figure sows te objectives of refrigerators
More informationf(x) f(a) x a Our intuition tells us that the slope of the tangent line to the curve at the point P is m P Q =
Lecture 6 : Derivatives and Rates of Cange In tis section we return to te problem of finding te equation of a tangent line to a curve, y f(x) If P (a, f(a)) is a point on te curve y f(x) and Q(x, f(x))
More informationGeometric Stratification of Accounting Data
Stratification of Accounting Data Patricia Gunning * Jane Mary Horgan ** William Yancey *** Abstract: We suggest a new procedure for defining te boundaries of te strata in igly skewed populations, usual
More informationPareto gains from trade: a dynamic counterexample
Economics Letters 83 (2004) 199 204 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Pareto gains from trade: a dynamic counterexample Gerald Willmann* Department of Economics, Institute für VWL, Universität zu Kiel,
More informationFINITE DIFFERENCE METHODS
FINITE DIFFERENCE METHODS LONG CHEN Te best known metods, finite difference, consists of replacing eac derivative by a difference quotient in te classic formulation. It is simple to code and economic to
More informationThe Derivative. Not for Sale
3 Te Te Derivative 3. Limits 3. Continuity 3.3 Rates of Cange 3. Definition of te Derivative 3.5 Grapical Differentiation Capter 3 Review Etended Application: A Model for Drugs Administered Intravenously
More informationA Model of Generic Drug Shortages: Supply Disruptions, Demand Substitution, and Price Control
A Model of Generic Drug Sortages: Supply Disruptions, Demand Substitution, and Price Control SangHyun Kim, Fiona Scott Morton Yale Scool of Management, Yale University, 165 Witney Avenue, New Haven, CT
More informationOptimized Data Indexing Algorithms for OLAP Systems
Database Systems Journal vol. I, no. 2/200 7 Optimized Data Indexing Algoritms for OLAP Systems Lucian BORNAZ Faculty of Cybernetics, Statistics and Economic Informatics Academy of Economic Studies, Bucarest
More informationA system to monitor the quality of automated coding of textual answers to open questions
Researc in Official Statistics Number 2/2001 A system to monitor te quality of automated coding of textual answers to open questions Stefania Maccia * and Marcello D Orazio ** Italian National Statistical
More informationThe modelling of business rules for dashboard reporting using mutual information
8 t World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 37 July 2009 ttp://mssanz.org.au/modsim09 Te modelling of business rules for dasboard reporting using mutual information Gregory Calbert Command, Control,
More informationThis supplement is meant to be read after Venema s Section 9.2. Throughout this section, we assume all nine axioms of Euclidean geometry.
Mat 444/445 Geometry for Teacers Summer 2008 Supplement : Similar Triangles Tis supplement is meant to be read after Venema s Section 9.2. Trougout tis section, we assume all nine axioms of uclidean geometry.
More informationThe Greater the Differences, the Greater the Gains?
The Greater the Differences, the Greater the Gains? Wilfred J. Ethier Department of Economics University of Pennsylvania First version: 30 November 2007 This printing: 21 April 2009 The Greater the Differences,
More informationEC201 Intermediate Macroeconomics. EC201 Intermediate Macroeconomics Problem set 8 Solution
EC201 Intermediate Macroeconomics EC201 Intermediate Macroeconomics Prolem set 8 Solution 1) Suppose tat te stock of mone in a given econom is given te sum of currenc and demand for current accounts tat
More informationON LOCAL LIKELIHOOD DENSITY ESTIMATION WHEN THE BANDWIDTH IS LARGE
ON LOCAL LIKELIHOOD DENSITY ESTIMATION WHEN THE BANDWIDTH IS LARGE Byeong U. Park 1 and Young Kyung Lee 2 Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Tae Yoon Kim 3 and Ceolyong Park
More informationCyber Epidemic Models with Dependences
Cyber Epidemic Models wit Dependences Maocao Xu 1, Gaofeng Da 2 and Souuai Xu 3 1 Department of Matematics, Illinois State University mxu2@ilstu.edu 2 Institute for Cyber Security, University of Texas
More informationf(a + h) f(a) f (a) = lim
Lecture 7 : Derivative AS a Function In te previous section we defined te derivative of a function f at a number a (wen te function f is defined in an open interval containing a) to be f (a) 0 f(a + )
More informationNotes: Most of the material in this chapter is taken from Young and Freedman, Chap. 12.
Capter 6. Fluid Mecanics Notes: Most of te material in tis capter is taken from Young and Freedman, Cap. 12. 6.1 Fluid Statics Fluids, i.e., substances tat can flow, are te subjects of tis capter. But
More informationA LowTemperature Creep Experiment Using Common Solder
A LowTemperature Creep Experiment Using Common Solder L. Roy Bunnell, Materials Science Teacer Soutridge Hig Scool Kennewick, WA 99338 roy.bunnell@ksd.org Copyrigt: Edmonds Community College 2009 Abstract:
More informationCHAPTER TWO. f(x) Slope = f (3) = Rate of change of f at 3. x 3. f(1.001) f(1) Average velocity = 1.1 1 1.01 1. s(0.8) s(0) 0.8 0
CHAPTER TWO 2.1 SOLUTIONS 99 Solutions for Section 2.1 1. (a) Te average rate of cange is te slope of te secant line in Figure 2.1, wic sows tat tis slope is positive. (b) Te instantaneous rate of cange
More informationQuality differentiation and entry choice between online and offline markets
Quality differentiation and entry choice between online and offline markets Yijuan Chen Australian National University Xiangting u Renmin University of China Sanxi Li Renmin University of China ANU Working
More informationChapter 11. Limits and an Introduction to Calculus. Selected Applications
Capter Limits and an Introduction to Calculus. Introduction to Limits. Tecniques for Evaluating Limits. Te Tangent Line Problem. Limits at Infinit and Limits of Sequences.5 Te Area Problem Selected Applications
More informationExam 2 Review. . You need to be able to interpret what you get to answer various questions.
Exam Review Exam covers 1.6,.1.3, 1.5, 4.14., and 5.15.3. You sould know ow to do all te omework problems from tese sections and you sould practice your understanding on several old exams in te exam
More informationIn other words the graph of the polynomial should pass through the points
Capter 3 Interpolation Interpolation is te problem of fitting a smoot curve troug a given set of points, generally as te grap of a function. It is useful at least in data analysis (interpolation is a form
More informationTrapezoid Rule. y 2. y L
Trapezoid Rule and Simpson s Rule c 2002, 2008, 200 Donald Kreider and Dwigt Lar Trapezoid Rule Many applications of calculus involve definite integrals. If we can find an antiderivative for te integrand,
More informationAsymmetric Trade Liberalizations and Current Account Dynamics
Asymmetric Trade Liberalizations and Current Account Dynamics Alessandro Barattieri January 15, 2015 Abstract Te current account deficits of Spain, Portugal and Greece are te result of large deficits in
More informationHeterogeneous firms and trade costs: a reading of French access to European agrofood
Heterogeneous firms and trade costs: a reading of Frenc access to European agrofood markets CevassusLozza E., Latouce K. INRA, UR 34, F44000 Nantes, France Abstract Tis article offers a new reading of
More informationTargeted Pricing, Consumer Myopia and Investment in CustomerTracking Technologie
No 3 Targeted Pricing, Consumer Myoia and Investment in CustomerTracking Tecnologie Irina aye, Geza Sai February 204 IMPRINT DICE DISCUSSION PPER Publised by düsseldorf university ress (du) on bealf of
More informationTHE IMPACT OF INTERLINKED INDEX INSURANCE AND CREDIT CONTRACTS ON FINANCIAL MARKET DEEPENING AND SMALL FARM PRODUCTIVITY
THE IMPACT OF INTERLINKED INDEX INSURANCE AND CREDIT CONTRACTS ON FINANCIAL MARKET DEEPENING AND SMALL FARM PRODUCTIVITY Micael R. Carter Lan Ceng Alexander Sarris University of California, Davis University
More informationFirst Welfare Theorem
First Welfare Theorem Econ 2100 Fall 2015 Lecture 17, November 2 Outline 1 First Welfare Theorem 2 Preliminaries to Second Welfare Theorem Last Class Definitions A feasible allocation (x, y) is Pareto
More informationOnce you have reviewed the bulletin, please
Akron Public Scools OFFICE OF CAREER EDUCATION BULLETIN #5 : Driver Responsibilities 1. Akron Board of Education employees assigned to drive Boardowned or leased veicles MUST BE FAMILIAR wit te Business
More informationShell and Tube Heat Exchanger
Sell and Tube Heat Excanger MECH595 Introduction to Heat Transfer Professor M. Zenouzi Prepared by: Andrew Demedeiros, Ryan Ferguson, Bradford Powers November 19, 2009 1 Abstract 2 Contents Discussion
More informationACT Math Facts & Formulas
Numbers, Sequences, Factors Integers:..., 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3,... Rationals: fractions, tat is, anyting expressable as a ratio of integers Reals: integers plus rationals plus special numbers suc as
More informationTorchmark Corporation 2001 Third Avenue South Birmingham, Alabama 35233 Contact: Joyce Lane 9725693627 NYSE Symbol: TMK
News Release Torcmark Corporation 2001 Tird Avenue Sout Birmingam, Alabama 35233 Contact: Joyce Lane 9725693627 NYSE Symbol: TMK TORCHMARK CORPORATION REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAREND 2004 RESULTS
More informationCatalogue no. 12001XIE. Survey Methodology. December 2004
Catalogue no. 1001XIE Survey Metodology December 004 How to obtain more information Specific inquiries about tis product and related statistics or services sould be directed to: Business Survey Metods
More informationModeling Insurance Markets
Modeling Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren Harvard April, 2015 Nathaniel Hendren (Harvard) Insurance April, 2015 1 / 29 Modeling Competition Insurance Markets is Tough There is no wellagreed upon model
More informationPioneer Fund Story. Searching for Value Today and Tomorrow. Pioneer Funds Equities
Pioneer Fund Story Searcing for Value Today and Tomorrow Pioneer Funds Equities Pioneer Fund A Cornerstone of Financial Foundations Since 1928 Te fund s relatively cautious stance as kept it competitive
More informationA Note on Optimal Fiscal Policy in an Economy with Private Borrowing Limits
A Note on Optimal Fiscal Policy in an Economy with Private Borrowing Limits Marina Azzimonti y Pierre Yared z October 28, 206 Abstract This note considers the implications for optimal scal policy when
More informationOur development of economic theory has two main parts, consumers and producers. We will start with the consumers.
Lecture 1: Budget Constraints c 2008 Je rey A. Miron Outline 1. Introduction 2. Two Goods are Often Enough 3. Properties of the Budget Set 4. How the Budget Line Changes 5. The Numeraire 6. Taxes, Subsidies,
More informationProof of the Power Rule for Positive Integer Powers
Te Power Rule A function of te form f (x) = x r, were r is any real number, is a power function. From our previous work we know tat x x 2 x x x x 3 3 x x In te first two cases, te power r is a positive
More informationChildren as insurance
J Popul Econ 2001) 14: 119±136 999 2001 Cildren as insurance Claus Cr. PoÈrtner University of Copenagen, Institute of Economics, Studiestraede 6, 1455 Copenagen K, Denmark Fax: 4535323085, email: claus.poertner@econ.ku.dk)
More informationAreaSpecific Recreation Use Estimation Using the National Visitor Use Monitoring Program Data
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Nortwest Researc Station Researc Note PNWRN557 July 2007 AreaSpecific Recreation Use Estimation Using te National Visitor Use Monitoring
More informationThe Design and Efficiency of Loyalty Rewards Ramon Caminal This version: October 2010 October 2009
The Design and Efficiency of Loyalty Rewards Ramon Caminal This version: October 010 October 009 Barcelona GSE Working Paper Series Working Paper nº 408 The design and e ciency of loyalty rewards Ramon
More information 1  Handout #22 May 23, 2012 Huffman Encoding and Data Compression. CS106B Spring 2012. Handout by Julie Zelenski with minor edits by Keith Schwarz
CS106B Spring 01 Handout # May 3, 01 Huffman Encoding and Data Compression Handout by Julie Zelenski wit minor edits by Keit Scwarz In te early 1980s, personal computers ad ard disks tat were no larger
More information2.12 Student Transportation. Introduction
Introduction Figure 1 At 31 Marc 2003, tere were approximately 84,000 students enrolled in scools in te Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, of wic an estimated 57,000 were transported by scool buses.
More informationModule 2. The Science of Surface and Ground Water. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module Te Science of Surface and Ground Water Version CE IIT, Karagpur Lesson 6 Principles of Ground Water Flow Version CE IIT, Karagpur Instructional Objectives On completion of te lesson, te student
More informationComparison between two approaches to overload control in a Real Server: local or hybrid solutions?
Comparison between two approaces to overload control in a Real Server: local or ybrid solutions? S. Montagna and M. Pignolo Researc and Development Italtel S.p.A. Settimo Milanese, ITALY Abstract Tis wor
More informationGlobal Sourcing of Complex Production Processes
Global Sourcing of Complex Production Processes December 2013 Cristian Scwarz Jens Suedekum Abstract We develop a teory of a firm in an incomplete contracts environment wic decides on te complexity, te
More information1. Case description. Best practice description
1. Case description Best practice description Tis case sows ow a large multinational went troug a bottom up organisational cange to become a knowledgebased company. A small community on knowledge Management
More information1 Derivatives of Piecewise Defined Functions
MATH 1010E University Matematics Lecture Notes (week 4) Martin Li 1 Derivatives of Piecewise Define Functions For piecewise efine functions, we often ave to be very careful in computing te erivatives.
More information