even more of a concern is that children do not always know the identity of the



Similar documents
Fall 2014 LACCD District-wide Student Survey Results - Los Angeles Mission College

The Negative Effects of Social Media on Children and Young Adults

SPRING VALLEY MIDDLE-HIGH SCHOOL. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Guidelines

TELECOMMUNICATION PLAN AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION USE 8.60+

Peer Counseling Application

Board of Education Procedure 9.21a Findlay City School District

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Student, Teacher and Parent Guide

Clarity Middle School Survey

HCISD A Digital District High Access BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) District Guidelines

Bright Local Schools BYOD Acceptable Use Policy

From the Superintendent...

Maypearl ISD. Bring Your Own Device (B.Y.O.D.)

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Policy - Students SDS-22

Christian Academy of Knoxville Technology Responsible Use Agreement

Teaching Digital Citizenship

GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS Greenwich, Connecticut

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Handbook. Smackover-Norphlet School District

Plymouth School of Creative Arts Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) 1 st Sep 2014

SafeGov Boston Parents Survey. Views on technology in the classroom from Boston s parents

West Ada School District Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Program. BYOD Guide August 2014 PURPOSE ACCESS THEFT, LOSS OR DAMAGE

How To Protect Children From Abuse

51 JS-R STUDENT USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) to Collegium Charter School Acceptable Use Statement and Parameters of a Pilot Program for Grades 9-12

Who Needs Parental Controls?

Maumee City School District Bylaws & Policies

Universal Design for Learning and Gifted Students in the 21 st Century Classroom

Fireside Script. [INSERT VIDEO #4 WHAT KIDS ARE DOING/USING at

Authorization for Electronic Network Access AUP and BYOD Policies DEFINITIONS. BYOD Bring Your Own Device. AUP Authorized Use Policy

JHMS PERSONAL ELECTRONIC DEVICE POLICY

Clare Middle School. Which should I bring? PLAN

Quincy Public Schools Information Technology. Acceptable Use Policy for Staff, Students, and Guests

Triad Local School District Bring Your Own Device Student Device User Agreement F1

School Policy Regarding Computer Use, Technology and Internet Access

Generational differences

Mrs. Rovito: Science. Ms. Jugenitz: Social Studies

Mobiles /3 A4 3/14/06 2:54 PM Page 1. VISIT THE NUT HEALTH AND SAFETY POST Camera Mobile Phones Health and Safety Issues

EDD Curriculum Teaching and Technology by Joyce Matthews Marcus Matthews France Alcena

Teacher Technology Usage

FREDERICK BREMER SCHOOL E SAFETY POLICY Date of Issue: June 2015 Ratified: For review:

Bring Your Own Technology Guide (BYOT) Student & Parent Guide for Best Practices

CFHS Grading Scale: Computer Lab Rules: THESE RULES ARE DISTRICT POLICIES AND MONITORED BY THE ADMINISTRATION, TECH SUPPORT AND TEACHER

Program Report for the Preparation of Elementary School Teachers Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) 2007 Standards - Option A

Clarity High School Student Survey

DA VINCI DESIGN ENGLISH 9 & COMPOSITION MR. KALMA akalma@davincischools.org Room 104

How To Teach Family Life Education

Appendix A: Educational Technology Planning Resources

Standards for Student Interpersonal Skills

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)

District Technology Guidelines. for Students and Parents/Guardians, updated for

HOW TO STAY SAFE. Smartphones

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Guidelines Gettys Middle School

baseline for outstanding practice

BANK VIEW HIGH SCHOOL

Carver Middle School Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)

Purposes for the Culminating Experience: General Guidelines

How To Know What Your Mom Thinks

BYOD. School District of New Berlin New Berlin, WI

ECED 2320-Infant, Toddler and Child Development Formerly Known as ECED 2020

Prevention of Substance Abuse Among Adolescents By Meaghan Long

Definition Purpose Bring Your Own Device required Guidelines Responsibility for Devices

PARENTING IN THE DIGITAL AGE. Patti Agatston, Ph.D.

Assessment of children s educational achievements in early childhood education

Lighthouse Christian School Responsible Use Agreement Version 2.0 ( )

Frisco ISD

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Usage and Network Access Guidelines. Rules and Requirements

Digital Citizenship Lesson Plan

THE ANGLO-AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MOSCOW. K-12 Health Education

POLICY BOARD OF EDUCATION FRANKLIN BOROUGH. PROGRAM 2422/Page 1 of 5 Health and Physical Education Jun 02 Mar 16

Northwest Community Schools Bring Your Own Device Program Policy

Computer Graphics, Animation & Video

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

Bible Based Digital Citizenship. Digital Literacy. Engaged Learning. ipad Parent Training

Regional School District No. 7. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Protocol for the Use of Technology in the Schools

Evaluation of a Laptop Program: Successes and Recommendations

Silver Core Objective Fulfilled:

If we teach today s students as we taught yesterday s, we rob them of tomorrow. John Dewey

Iowa Park CISD BYOD Policy

Melville Primary School. Bring Your Own ipad Connectable Device Program Usage Policy and Information for Parents and Students

MATTC Course Descriptions

Sheboygan Falls Schools BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) Student and Parent Guide

COMMUNICATION COMMUNITIES CULTURES COMPARISONS CONNECTIONS. STANDARDS FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING Preparing for the 21st Century

National School Debate: Banning Cell Phones on Public School Campuses in America

Q1 Which school do you attend?

Acceptable Use Policy for Technology Catholic Schools of the Diocese of Brooklyn

Parent & Student Guide

Your answers will be kept private. Your answers will be combined with those of other parents in a report of the survey findings.

Personal Security and Safe Routes to School

Bringing Toys to School

Administrative Procedures Memorandum A1300

How To Improve Your Knowledge Of Psychology

Texas WIC Nutrition Education Survey Local Agency 067 Report June 2014

Setting Targets for Objectives

SPRING-FORD IS MAKING EVERY DAY COUNT! Dr. David Goodin Spring-Ford Area School District Year In Review

Subject: Computer Network and Internet Use Agreement Guidelines

Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2014

Schoolbags. How heavy is too heavy? ** No one should carry more than 25 lb. Weight (lb.) or more 25**

Selected figures from. Keep Them Reading. An Anti-Censorship Handbook for Educators. ReLeah Cossett Lent Gloria Pipkin

Device: Refers to any technology that boys bring to use to connect to the school wireless network in the BYOD Program.

Geyserville New Tech Academy Student Technology Acceptable Use Policy

Computer Assisted Language Learning. Introduction

Transcription:

Student's Name Tutor's Name Course # dd mm yyyy Critical Essay: Having Cell Phones in Elementary School Today s new generation is referred to as the igeneration because of such technologies as the iphone, ipad, itouch, and so forth (Rosen 8). As recently as the past decade, schools have had to determine their stance on students with personal electronics in the school, from the use of storage devices such as the flash drive, to the use of ipods for listening to music and podcasts, to the use of cell phones. Many schools quickly developed policies against the use of any personal electronic devices. The policies were aimed mostly at the high school level but trickled down to the lower grades. Very recently, though, educators have come to realize that student use of personal electronics may alleviate the stress of not having available enough computers, tablets, and other electrons in a timely, readily accessible manner for individual student use. They also have come to realize that banning cell phones in school may be too difficult to enforce. Parents want immediate access to their children, for example. However, addressing cell phones in high school, or even junior high school, is somewhat different than addressing it for elementary-aged students. A major concern for children s use of cell phones centers on the issue of electronic bullying. Students on all grade levels encounter bullying, whether they are witnesses to it, are victims of it, or are perpetuators of it. What makes electronic bullying even more of a concern is that children do not always know the identity of the

perpetrator, whether it is a single person or a group of people, and if the child knows the person (Kowalski & Limber 22). Because electronic bullying can be easily transmitted to others, the potential audience for electronic bullying is limitless. Schools are left to develop policies and procedures for dealing with electronic bullying, which includes educating their students, teachers, and parents regarding electronic bullying. Part of the debate on whether to allow student-owned cell phones into the elementary school, then, is the issue of student protection against electronic bullying and also issues of whether students will abuse the access to their cell phones with inappropriate text-messaging and gaming, for example. On the other side of the coin, however, is looking at how often children use cell phones and for what purpose. Rosen found in his study that parents report that their elementary school-aged children are utilizing technology at a much younger age than their older brothers and sisters did (10). They are growing up in an environment where technology is ubiquitous in all areas of their lives. They have information and the means to learn at their fingertips. Five to eight year olds communicate electronically half an hour daily. Nine to twelve year olds communicate electronically 2.5 hours a day. Half of pre-teens have personal cell phones and ipads (Rosen 10). Rosen argues that educators might consider using various electronic devices for a means of delivering virtual content, having online class discussions, and having students to complete and submit assignments online. Rosen s idea that educators utilize students personally owned technology in the classroom brings one to the consideration of what today s students should be learning in

preparation for their future. Too often, our students are leaving school unprepared for the existing job market. They lack skills in critical thinking, communication, and collaboration. Skills needed for 21 st century living are different than what was needed for 20 th century living. Our schools must shift from the mind-set of preparing students for the Industrial Age to preparing them for the 21 st century. Heavy emphasis is on collaboration and communication skills. Among tools needed to support students in developing skills for 21 st century learning and living include access to the Internet, educational games, and cell phones (Trilling 8). Trilling argues that since technology has become an important part of children s lives, they should bring their technology from home rather than compete for limited technology at school (8). Indeed, that is exactly what is happening in many schools. They are slowly beginning to realize that students have the availability to direct their own learning through the use of electronic devices. Students use electronic devices for accessing factual information, delving deeper into areas of interest, playing games to develop skills and concepts, for communication, and for collaborative learning. Cell phones, especially smart phones, provide students with immediate access to tools and information that help them in their academic endeavors. Concerns like electronic bullying are valid, as are concerns for any kind of bullying. Students must be taught ethical practices in anything they do and use, but they must also be allowed to use tools at their disposal to help them to achieve or to attain goals, such as in learning.

4 Works Cited Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(1), 2007. Print. Rosen, L. Welcome to the... igeneration! Education Digest, 75(8), 2010. Print. Trilling, B. Leading learning in our times. Principal, 89(3), 2010. Print.