ASTRAEA the findings so far



Similar documents
Opening the airspace to UAS - ASTRAEA s next phase

Opening the Airspace for UAS

Opening the European Sky to UAS From military to civilian

The 7 th International Scientific Conference DEFENSE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE 21st CENTURY Braşov, November 15 th 2012

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project

Space Applications and Technologies Expo Rome, Italy February 4 6, 2010

EUROCONTROL. Paving the way towards UAS ATM integration. Mike Lissone

SESAR Studies & Demonstration Projects on RPAS & Cyber-Security

SESAR RPAS R&D ROADMAP DEVELOPMENT

EUROPEAN CIVIL RPAS OPERATORS FORUM

TERMS OF REFERENCE RTCA Special Committee 228 Minimum Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Rev 2) REQUESTORS:

Integration of Drones in Civil Airspace

NATO Developments in UAS Airworthiness and Sense & Avoid Functional Requirements. Mr. Dave Seagle US HoD, NATO FINAS

RPAS-EASA update EUROCAE, WG-73, 12 February, Eric Sivel, Innovation and Research Programme Manager

AeroMACS Briefing / Update

Concept of Operations for Drones A risk based approach to regulation of unmanned aircraft

Aircraft Tracking & Flight Data Recovery

PRESENTATION. Patrick Ky Executive Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project

Director Air Defence and Airspace Management. Presentation to ATC Global. March 2011

WATCHKEEPER X UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS)

In which new or innovative ways do you think RPAS will be used in the future?

Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace Guidance

Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace Guidance

European High-Level Unmanned Aircraft Systems Conference

The need for Safety Intelligence based on European safety data analysis

AUGUST FOLLOW-UP ON NEW RULES AND REGULATIONS by Rudi Schuegraf

SES Safety and ATM/ANS Regulations - EASA activities related to MET services

European ADS-B Regulation

Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace Guidance

Current Challenges in UAS Research Intelligent Navigation and Sense & Avoid

"What's being done to keep the helicopter in the air?"

UAS Safety in Non-segregated Airspace

CS#7 Network Infrastructure Performance monitoring and analysis Service (NIPS) Eric Potier

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)

Why it may be time to consider Certified Avionics for UAS (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles/Systems) White paper

SAFETY ADVISOR UAS IN THE USA MANNED & UNMANNED AIRCRAFT FLYING TOGETHER SAFELY

UAS Forum Sweden Att öppna Europas och Sverige luftrum för UAS. Gunnar Frisk, Saab AB 19 Maj 2015

Annex to Decision 2013/008/R

Transport Spectrum Tune-Up Aviation Spectrum Issues. Eddy D Amico, RF Spectrum Manager Airservices Australia. November 2009

Propsim enabled Mobile Ad-hoc Network Testing

Space Based ADS-B. Transforming the Way you See the Sky March, COPYRIGHT 2014 AIREON LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

GC M.029 (RMT.0217) and RMT Issue 1

CS5 EAIMS Call For Interest Technical annexe

How To Improve The Performance Of Anatm

INTEGRITY AND CONTINUITY ANALYSIS OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2013 QUARTERLY REPORT FROM GPS. Integrity and Continuity Analysis 08/01/14 08/01/14 08/01/14

THE SESAR CONCEPT AND SWIM. David Bowen Head of ATM Operations & Systems SESAR Joint Undertaking

Air Traffic Management Services Plan

Sensing, monitoring and actuating on the UNderwater world through a federated Research InfraStructure Extending the Future Internet SUNRISE

Safety Management Systems (SMS) guidance for organisations

SESAR Air Traffic Management Modernization. Honeywell Aerospace Advanced Technology June 2014

FAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)

Advanced Data Link Infrastructure Solution for Next Generation of Air Traffic Management

CYBER SECURITY IN CIVIL AVIATION

Título ponencia: Helicopter IFP. Point-in-Space (PinS)

Industry and Business Applications. Industry and Business Applications

KILN GROUP AVIATION DIVISION UAS INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM GLOSSARY

Dynamic Vulnerability Assessment

Experts in wireless device and infrastructure test solutions

UAS in the NAS Flight Test Series 3

Overview of the European PPlane project

Understanding Compliance with Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Out

International Civil Aviation Organization The Fourth Meeting of the APANPIRG ATM Sub-Group (ATM /SG/4) Bangkok, Thailand, July 2016

Castor Demo Simulations

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. DEFINITION 4 3. UAS CLASSIFICATION 6 4. REGULATORY PRINCIPLES INTERACTION WITH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 16

Service, Security, Solutions Since Insurance and Risk Management Considerations for UAS RPAS Symposium, Montreal. March 2015

Assessment of changes to functional systems in ATM/ANS and the oversight thereof

The joint EU Telematics governance model

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Recorders installation and maintenance thereof certification aspects

NZQA registered unit standard version 1 Page 1 of 8. Apply knowledge of aircraft radio systems to the certification of aeronautical maintenance

Why Study Aerospace Engineering? Deciding Your Future

Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS)

INITIAL TEST RESULTS OF PATHPROX A RUNWAY INCURSION ALERTING SYSTEM

Speaking the same language on noise exposure in Europe: the outcome of phase A of CNOSSOS-EU process

Official Journal of the European Union L 13/3

Managing risk in construction projects how to achieve a successful outcome*

EASA Safety Information Bulletin

Australian Enhanced Flight Tracking Evaluation Performance Report. August 2015

CAR/SAM STRATEGY FOR THE EVOLUTION OF AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

Pricing Framework July 2012

Polska Agencja Żeglugi Powietrznej Polish Air Navigation Services Agency

CANADIAN AVIATION REGULATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CARAC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (NPA) CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Maintenance Directive

For the purpose of see-and-avoid, visual observers must be utilized at all times

ADVANCED INTEGRATED TECHONOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES

PLANNIN WORKING PAPER. International. Theme 1: WORK. (Presented by SUMMARY. in this paper. feasibility of. system in the future.

Organisation for Joint Armament Co-operation Executive Administration

SMS in Small Ops. A Case Study. Sonya Tietjen. MSc, Aviation Safety Management City University London

The International Scenario

IN FLIGHT SECURITY INCIDENT MANAGEMENT

5G Network Infrastructure for the Future Internet

Part-145 Organisation

Transcription:

ASTRAEA the findings so far Lambert Dopping- Hepenstal, FREng RPAS CivOps 2014 3 rd December 2014

Contents The ASTRAEA programme Regulatory engagement Programme achievement examples Communications Detect & Avoid Virtual Certification Next steps

Programme Objectives Enable the routine use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in all classes of airspace without the need for restrictive or special conditions of operation. Develop and demonstrate key technologies and operating procedures required to open up the airspace. Support the development of the regulatory framework for this new class of operation. ASTRAEA Autonomous System Technology Related Airborne Evaluation & Assessment

Systems approach

Functional Architecture Block Diagram Air vehicle Airfield Ground Control Station

Functional Architecture Complex Flight Management System

Regulatory engagement RPAS organisations (ASTRAEA connection) JARUS secretariat JARUS Secretariat - Implementation Steering Group and EC Regs development coordinator (Through ASD) Agreed set of deliverables to JARUS Secretariat JARUS secretariat EASA Airworthiness Operations Personnel Licencing JARUS group ICAO RPAS Manual and ICAO SARPS (Through ICCAIA) RPAS Specifications (Through ASD) MOPS and MASPS (Direct support) ASTRAEA Regulatory, Technology and Societal workshops - For programme information, collaboration and dissemination RPAS standards and regulations stakeholders JARUS group ICCAIA CAP 722 ICAO support JARUS support EUROCAE support (consultancy contract) The Aerospace and Defence Industries Association of Europe (Partner representation) The International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations (Through ASD) Phase 1 Accommodation of UAS in Class A airspace Regulatory Development Regulatory development Techniques validation Virtual certification and qualification IAW EC RPAS Regulatory, Technology and Societal Roadmaps Phase 2 Partial integration of UAS in Class A-D Airspace Techniques and validation Transparency Contingency management Security Detect and avoid Surface operations Operational utility JARC Phase 3 Emulated full integration of (surrogate) UAS/OPV in Class A-D airspace Virtual certification of development system Scenario creation External workshops

Representation EuroCAE WG73 Secretariat WG73 SG1 Airworthiness WG73 SG2 Collision Avoidance WG73 SG3 Communications WG72 Security ICAO RPAS Panel Frequency Spectrum Management Panel (FSMP)

Main themes Autonomy & Decision Making Ground Operations & Human Systems Interaction Communications, Security & Spectrum Detect & Avoid

Communications, Security & Spectrum Tests have established that Satellite communications for RPAS operations are only feasible in low ATC workload due to latency issues. Increased access to terrestrial communications is needed for higher ATC Workload areas. Ad hoc networking with seamless transition has been demonstrated as a feasible solution for BRLOS communications. Spectrum requirements have been analysed in support of WRC2012 and WRC2015. UAS security requirement defined and method of certification has been proposed.

Communications, Security & Spectrum Next steps Airborne demonstration of ad-hoc network solution. Whole platform solution including deployable ground infrastructure. C2 required communications performance evidence gathering. Continuing support to WRC2015, EuroCAE WG73, ICAO RPASP and ICAO FSMP UAS security validation for airworthiness and operations support to EuroCAE WG72

Detect & Avoid ADS-B (Cooperative Sensing) Proved Highly Reliable Detection performance typically >6 mins Sufficient to accommodate Rules of the Air Electro Optical (Non Cooperative Sensing) High resolution optical sensors that can detect intruders against complex clutter backgrounds Determine whether they pose a threat Alert RPAS Operator to the danger Current Architecture / Algorithms Detection performance typically ~ 1 min Acceptable False Alarm Rate Missed Detections ~ nil

Detect & Avoid Next Steps The baseline performance of the optical detect and avoid system has been demonstrated across a wide number of encounters: It shows a good detection and false alarm rate performance in challenging conditions. Work is on-going to further improve both the false alarm rate and the accuracy with which the system can predict the time until collision. Future laboratory and trials work includes: Investigating the ability of novel imaging techniques to improve the exposure of the imagery in high-contrast situations. Testing the system against extreme environmental conditions Enhancing the characteristics of the processing system for integration and trials on a tactical RPAS platform.

Virtual Certification Define a Concept of Operation Embody the Technology developed under ASTRAEA Produce a Virtual Certification Document Suite in partnership with the CAA (34 documents) + Take an existing certified aircraft + Introduce a UAS architecture + Autonomy and Decision Making Comms & Spectrum Ground Ops & Human System Interaction Detect and Avoid Compliance Checklist Hazard Analysis Functional Spec Means of Compliance

Virtual Certification Virtual Certification document set jointly developed with UK CAA based on the four ASTRAEA sub-themes. ASTRAEA 2 Virtual Certification document released (EuroCAE Web Portal) RPAS Compliance Checklist derived from CS-23 and CS-25 Certification Specifications RPAS Special Conditions Functional Specification Functional Hazard Analysis Proposed Acceptable Means of Compliance Supplementary tasks such as:- CAP722 Pre version update technical review Communications Security study

Virtual Certification Next steps Continued Development of RPAS Virtual Certification documents, to focus on new ASTRAEA sub-themes Maintain engagement with UK CAA ASTRAEA 3 to engage with other (European) work groups to enable shared learning Use of Virtual Certification documents to help inform emerging regulatory requirements Development of body of evidence to underpin a Qualification process for the sub-themes Develop ETSO level information for each of the sub-themes

Alignment with RPAS Roadmap 3B 3A

ASTRAEA 3B Regulation and Certification continuation of the regulatory framework development with the CAA engagement with appropriate European and international organisations developing performance standards and guidance material extension of the Virtual Certification process. Capability Development and Demonstration continued development of key technologies synthetic environment experiments hardware-in-the-loop rig trials surrogate and UAS flight trials. Virtual Operations end-user and non-technical stakeholder engagement public perception engagements

Safe to fly Flown safely www.astraea.aero