SESAR Studies & Demonstration Projects on RPAS & Cyber-Security

Transcription

1 SESAR Studies & Demonstration Projects on RPAS & Cyber-Security Brussels, May 20 th 2014

2 2 Page 2

3 Rationale RPAS will generate the emergence of a new service sector RPAS limited by flight authorisations not aligned one-another and limited to segregated airspace Need to develop a seamless regulatory framework and enhance the coordination of various on-going R&D initiatives A broad, safe and swift RPAS integration into the aviation system requires an enhanced coordination between the numerous actors and the different activities involved (regulatory, R&D and others) RPAS insertion in airspace will be gradual and subsequently alleviated as soon as technology, regulation and societal acceptance progress 3

4 Requirements & Challenges Requirements for RPAS integration are linked to the European ATM Master Plan and the ICAO Global Plan/ASBU timeline RPAS will have to fit into the ATM system (and not the reverse), with required adaptations to enable the safe integration of unmanned systems RPAS will have to prove to be as safe as current manned vehicle operations and, their behaviour in operations, to be equivalent to manned aviation, in particular for air traffic control Thus, RPAS insertion into the Aviation System shall comply with: - existing and consider future regulations and procedures developments - the SESAR CONOPS(trajectory management) - ATC rules/procedures - capability requirements applicable to the airspace within which they operate And not to: - impact negatively the operations of the current system and its performance - compromise existing aviation safety levels nor increase risk levels. The way RPAS operations will be conducted, as regard to ATM operations has to be equivalent to manned aircraft 4

5 Page 5 Edit Footer In Slide Master

6 SESAR RPAS Demonstration Projects 09 RPAS Demonstration Projects, which include integrated pre-operational flight trials activities, have been selected: Demonstrating how to integrate RPAS into non-segregated airspace in a multi-aircraft and manned flight environment in order to explore the feasibility of integration with the wider aviation community by 2016 Providing concrete results, filling the operational and technical gaps identified for RPAS integration into non-segregated airspace Capitalising on the SESAR delivery approach by providing synergies, risk and opportunities, with the overall SESAR programme Airports ANSP Industry 6 RPAS Flight Operator

7 Timeline and deliverables KO Meeting Oct. / Nov to 90 days from KO meeting Jan. / March 2013 Today Max. 24 Months from KO Oct. / Nov Phase 1 " Definition " Phase 2 " Implementation " Deliverable D.01 Deliverable D.02 Demonstration Plan Including a Communication Strategy Final Report 7

8 8 Page 8

9 Necessity of the RPAS Definition Phase Refine the essential R&D activities for the integration in the EU Aviation System in the context of the SES initiative, as of 2016 and beyond Identify globally interoperable and harmonised ATM requirements and enablers to meet the performance requirements Produce a R&D and Validation programme - including planning, costs and priorities, as required by the different identified ATM requirements and enablers Establish a high level implementation timeline, including costs and priorities Provide material supporting the alignment of the legislative, financial and regulatory frameworks required for the deployment, including incentive mechanisms 9

10 Integration principles The following high-level operational requirements are to be considered: Comply with existing and consider future regulations and procedures developments Comply with the SESAR concept of operations and in particular trajectory management Comply with air traffic control rules/procedures Comply with the capability requirements applicable to the airspace within which they are intended to operate Not impact negatively the operations of the current system and its performance in particular for the current users of the airspace Not compromise existing aviation safety levels nor increase risk levels. The way RPAS operations will be conducted, as regard to ATM operations shall be equivalent to manned aircraft, as far as possible 10

11 Objective and Scope The RPAS Definition Phase has to result in the following tree of activities: Deliverable D.1: Regulatory and Business Framework Deliverable D.2: Performance Requirements and Assessment Deliverable D.3: Operational Changes in ATM Deliverable D.4: Enabling Systems Deliverable D.5: Validation Needs Deliverable D.6: SESAR RPAS R&D Progr. requirements and outline Deliverable D.7: Input to the EU ATM Master Plan Evaluation in progress - Kick-off end of July - End in March

12 12 Page 12 Edit Footer In Slide Master

13 Why a Cyber-Security Study? The ATM System has to be trusted by the general public and by Governmental Authorities: sufficiently secure, resilient and trustworthy As ATM System relies on SWIM: effective protection is essential to guarantee the effectiveness, efficiency and economy Not only a technological change but also a cultural change due to its existing architecture, components and reliance on human operators A systemic approach to cyber-security for SWIM, considering in particular best practices implemented in other sectors An opportunity with regard to operational and cross-border interoperability (needs for international cooperation to ensure interoperability, standards definition...) Need to understand the economic implications of any proposed investments in this area, for an accepted level of risk 13

14 Objective and Scope of the Study Introduce a holistic approach to cyber-security which complement the SESAR ATM security approach Provide a scalable approach and applicable across different stakeholders in different Member States at different levels of security maturity Support the SESAR next developments, in particular SWIM Be the grounds of a cyber-security strategy to participate to the effective deployment of the new ATM systems and to their interoperability Consider the interoperability dimension, the definition of standards agreed at international level Provide: Deliverable D.1: an ATM Cyber-Security Threat and Vulnerability Assessment Deliverable D.2: a SESAR Target ATM Cyber-Security Framework Deliverable D.3: a SESAR Cyber-Security Maturity Assessment Deliverable D.4: a SESAR Cyber-Security Strategy 14 Study kick-off in May 2014 foreseen end March 2015

15 15 Thanks for your attention