Minimum design radius 180m(590', 9.7 ) vs 200m(655', 8.7 )



Similar documents
SYSTEMWIDE REQUIREMENTS

0.0 Curb Radii Guidelines Version 1.0.2


Chapter 3: Third Street Light Rail

Proposed Service Design Guidelines

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CIVL 3161

Alignment design for Citybanan in Stockholm

Railway Track Design

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. State Planning Policy state interest guideline. State transport infrastructure

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

STOP CONSOLIDATION TRANSIT STRATEGIES

Effect on structures. Uniform settlement - no concerns. Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain

I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE PLACEMAKING STUDY Boston Redevelopment Authority

TH 23 Access Management Study Richmond to Paynesville

CHAPTER 8 CIVIL DESIGN

Salt Lake City Granary District. Transit Oriented, Mixed Use Development

Gas Meter Clearances and Service Installation Requirements

AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY EXEMPTIONS: AUSTRALASIAN RAILWAY ASSOCIATION

Technology White Paper Capacity Constrained Smart Grid Design

Chapter Forty-seven. RURAL TWO-LANE/MULTILANE STATE HIGHWAYS (New Construction/Reconstruction) BUREAU OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT MANUAL

TCRP Report 153: Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations. Part 2: Station Typology and Mode of Access Planning Tool

''The construction of the Public Urban Centre in Sikorskiego St. and Legionów Ave. in Łomża

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

Introduction to Station Area Planning The Charlotte Story

Capacity and Level of Service

CONFORMITY WITH PLANS; DRAINAGE.

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

Texas Case Studies in Access Management. Ed Hard, TTI

Transportation Alternatives

DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST Chapter 6 Special Consideration Design Guidelines

SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF ALEXANDRIA HEREBY ORDAINS:

A Review of Transit Technology Specifications

A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR TIMETABLE ADJUSTMENTS

Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives

Integrated Public Transport Service Planning Guidelines. Sydney Metropolitan Area

Rethinking Small Cell Backhaul

When is BRT the Best Option? 1:30 2:40 p.m.

Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices

ACCESS AUDIT OF WESTPORT HOUSE

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. ADA Compliance Training. Local Programs Engineer FHWA NJ Division

CITY OF ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES. for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

NEW BLUE LINE CONNECTIONS

Amtrak s s Vehicle/Track Interaction Measuring System Integrating the Control Strategies of Engineering, Mechanical and Operations

Temporary Traffic Management

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

DELIVERY & SERVICING PLAN. REDWOOD PARTNERSHIP Consulting Engineers Transportation Planners

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

Seagull Intersection Layout. Island Point Road - A Case Study. Authors: John Harper, Wal Smart, Michael de Roos

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

The risk of derailment and collision, and safety systems to prevent the risk

Airport Rail Link is gathering speed. Wolfgang Rueprich, Project Manager Airport Rail Link, October 21, 2009

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

SIGHT DISTANCE. Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E. Traffex Engineers Inc. WHY IS SIGHT DISTANCE SO IMPORTANT?

Railway Technical Web Pages Infopaper No. 3. Rules for High Speed Line Capacity or, Summary

Transit, Rail, Program, Project & Construction Management Experience

How To Improve Safety

Passenger Rail Service

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

CHAPTER 8: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION STSTEMS (ITS)

Draft Transportation Management Plan for Via Verdi Repair Project

Title: Integrating Management of Truck and Rail Systems in LA. INTERIM REPORT August 2015

Bruce Highway (Cooroy to Curra) Section A (Cooroy southern interchange to Sankeys Road)

Hyperloop Technologies Inc

Linear Motors for Mass Transit Systems, their Merits, Controls and Drive Aspects. Presented by: Konrad Woronowicz & Alireza Safaee

TRANSFERRING CONTAINER CRANES AROUND CORNERS USING CURVED RAILS DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Transportation Policy and Design Strategies. Freight Intensive. Level of Freight Presence

Managing the Transit Network A Primer on Key Concepts

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

ATTACHMENT TO NOTICE TO FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEM VEHICLE SUPPLIERS REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI 001)

Parking Management. Index. Purpose. Description. Relevance for Large Scale Events. Options. Technologies. Impacts. Integration potential

Adaptive Optimal Scheduling of Public Utility Buses in Metro Manila Using Fuzzy Logic Controller

FHWA Minnesota Division Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA INTERSTATE ACCESS REQUEST

National Bus Rapid Transit Institute (NBRTI) At the University of South Florida

2014 SFMTA Transit Fleet Management Plan March 2014

Operating Concept and System Design of a Transrapid Maglev Line and a High-Speed Railway in the pan-european Corridor IV

Brief Engineering Assessment: Cost estimate for building fiber optics to key anchor institutions

Tier 1 Strategies. WV Route 14 Corridor Management Plan

FHWA Colorado Division Control of Access to the Interstate and its Right-of-Way February 2005

Transcription:

Bigger is always better, of course. Minimum design radius 180m(590', 9.7 ) vs 200m(655', 8.7 ) Extemely constrained site, getting more constrained every month. Unpalatable tradeoffs are a given. Tradeoffs: radius versus platform length, radius versus platform count, radius versus easements/takings. UIC recommendation and UIC High Speed requirement is miniumum 180m Used by DB (ICE), RFF (TGV), etc. To ignore this (eg design around current US commuter equipment or one particular existing high speed train) would be very unwise: dangers of obsolescence, unique vendor, custom designs. PTG 200m minimum appears to be coming from CHSRA, but what justification? TGV, ICE, AGV (next generation), AVE, etc can negotiate <180m Design speeds up to 380kmh. Real costs (station capacity, land takes) at TTT site to requiring larger radii. Tradeoff example: 180m min radius 6 platforms Lengths - 340m (975' - 1100') 290m 320m 320m 340m 340m 330m Min R: 180m 200m min radius 5 platforms Lengths - (875' - 975') 280m Min R: 180m (Sixth platform road would collide with new CNet building) Shorter platforms between larger approach curves

Platform curvature (none vs 500+m radius) Zero curvature is best, of course. Extemely constrained site, getting more constrained every month. Unpalatable tradeoffs are a given. Tradeoffs: curved platforms versus platform length, curved platforms versus safety. Nearly all rail operators in the world serve stations with curved platforms, particularly at constrained urban stations. Platform gap (ADA, etc) is manageable. Typical suburban bilevel R 600m, b 9.5m, d 6m, gap = 3.0cm = 1.2 inch Fertagus. Lisboa, Portugal. New 1999 TGV R 600m, b 10m, d 8m, gap = 5.3cm = 2.1 inch Platform Gap g Platform Radius P Track Radius R Straight platforms 4 through platforms Through length 180m (600') Terminating length 230-250m (750' -825') Curve-o-rama 5 platforms Lengths - (875' - 975') Bogie offset b Doorway offset d Cars with doors at extremities are problematic... Crew sighting along train length is addressed by platform-mounted or in-cab CCTV. Standard equipment on many new suburban trains. 250m 180m+60m 180m 200m 200m 230m Min R: 200m Platform R: 280m Min R: 200m

Paths and Throats Restrictions and limits at TTT (both geometrical and operational) are likely to be the system-wide constraints for both all Caltrain corridor and all regional and long distance (including HSR) service. Maximal effort should be expended to "do no harm" and not to preclude future operations. Insufficient provision for station approach special work can cause permanent capacity limits. Ideally a pair of simultaneous departures and arrivals should be possible from any two station platforms. etc Even if traffic levels will not justify complex special work in the medium future, attempt to allow future reconfiguration through careful planning of excavation, column placement, etc. Insufficient provision for long trains can cause permanent passenger capacity limits as line capacity saturates. All successful High Speed services operate double-length (2 x 200m = 2x 650' = 1300') trains. ICE, TGV, Shinkansen. TTT site can't accomodate 400m, but can come very close (370m in oblique orientation.) Insufficient provision for future through-running roads can cause permanent transbay capacity problems. (Compare 2-road BART headways with 4-road Key System at TTT.) Train waiting to depart Train may proceed into station before previous train has cleared its platform Train waiting to depart Train held awaiting previous train departure Overlapping station dwells of sequential trains increases line capacity. Overlapping station dwells of sequential trains increases line capacity. Anticipating future (long term!) new transbay connection to relieve at-capacity BART Transbay/San Francisco "M Line", TTT must be allow at least four platform roads poised for extension through to the East Bay.

Mission Bay Station Alternatives in DEIR/DEIS completely inadequate Multi-track, multi-platform station required? Scheduling bottleneck from Bayshore to TTT. Limits express/local headways to > 10 minutes. Lengthy dwells for event (baseball) service? (Not if base service frequency is adequate!) Diesel power terminus Surface open-air level for terminating trains? $$$ Massive ventilation in subterranean station? Southern end in open cut, diesels idle outside? (eg Boston South Station) Storage yard? Leads? Caltrans, Morrison-Knudsen, 1987 Seventh/Townsend curve must be realigned. (6 ) seems doable... Catellus/C&CSF roadblocks Berry Street (trolley buses at grade!?!!) Sixteenth Street (ditto!?!!) Parcels zoned retail in inside of Caltrain curve adjacent to pumping station. Swap possible? Easement under 3rd/4th/King/Townsend block will be needed. Ideally station would be at least partially under joint development on that block...

Obliquity 2x360m 2x370m 330m(+50m) 260m 240m Min R: 180m Real alternative to Second/Main loop route (Essex stub-end not a serious alternative) Huge platform length advantages (5 x 360+m through roads possible.) Phaseable. Constructability questions. utilities? Dive under Muni MMT under Embarcadero? Station depth. (insert image of 301 Mission here) 301 (corner Beale, block 3719-1) will cost. But can be purchased/underpinned in a subsequent phase.???? Perverse storage location under and aligned with TTT?

MIssing the Point 0 10 50m 100m 200m Poor connections with other terminal transit services Poor connections with Market Street transit services Poor passenger circulation: all lengthwise, little lateral Station-length rail mezzanine required. $$$ Top of Rail ~ -30 feet. Large number of paths conflicts: inherent low throughput of stub terminals. Future transbay throughput very poor. Hawthorne Street 0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 500m 600m Constructible? Rock line at Folsom. Station throat and junction 80 feet down in weak rock under off-ramp and bus ramps. Doesn't meet the program, can't be built, why is this on the table? 22' 23' 51' 35' 65' 70' 83' 27' Essex Street Folsom Street Guy Place Lansing Street 90' 100' Harrison Street 5 71' 90' 85' 48' 28' 56' 1 Ecker Street 37' Clementina Street 15' 25' 28' 54' 50' 3 73' 57' 65' 75'

0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 22' 23' 51' 0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 500m 600m Clementina Street 3736-29 3721-51 3721-50 3721-25 3721-23 3736-97 3736-96 3736-65 3721-22 3721-52 3721-48 3721-49 3721-47 3736-98 3736-93 3736-94 3736-66 3736-64 Folsom Street 3721-21 3736-27 3721-27A 3736-100 3736-99 3736-93 3736-62 3721-28 3736-92 3736-35 3736-25 3721-53 3721-46 3721-20 3736-101 3736-102 65' 70' Existing deck (approx) 3736-91 3736-89 3736-88 3736-107 3736-86 3736-85 3736-84 3736-111 28' 56' 27' 3736-61 3736-36 3736-24 3721-29 3721-19 3736-67 35' 3736-37 3736-23 3721-31 3721-54 3721-45A 1 48' 3721-15A 3721-16 3736-110 3736-15 3636-74 3636-75 3636-76 3636-77 3636-78A 3736-18 3736-17 3721-14 3736-85 3736-83A 3736-1? 3736-83 3721-13 37' 3721-35 3736-114 3721-88 3736-116 3636-119 3721-6 3721-10 3721-11 3736-1 3736-2 3736-3A 3736-4 3636-74 3736-7 3736-120 15' 25' 28' 54' 50' Min R: 180m 2x360m 2x370m 330m(+50m) 2x310m 3720-7 3720-1 3720-5 3720-6 3719-10 3719-9 3719-8 33' 35' 3719-11 Key to Property Ownership Caltrans Vacant lot William Wilson Project Construction in Progress Developed Other Architectural Resource (Jan 1995) 2 1 3719-7 3719-1 3719-17 3719-3 3719-5 3719-6 3738-11 3738-12 11' 44' 3718-12 3 3738-4 3739-7 3739-4 3718-25 3718-26 3718-27 3739-2 3739-6 3739-8 Guy Place

0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 22' 23' 51' 0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 500m 600m Clementina Street 3736-29 3721-51 3721-50 3721-25 3721-23 3736-97 3736-96 3736-65 3721-22 3721-52 3721-48 3721-49 3721-47 3736-98 3736-93 3736-94 3736-66 3736-64 Folsom Street 3721-21 3736-27 3721-27A 3736-100 3736-99 3736-93 3736-62 3721-28 3736-92 3736-35 3736-25 3721-53 3721-46 3721-20 3736-101 3736-102 65' 70' Existing deck (approx) 3736-91 3736-89 3736-88 3736-107 3736-86 3736-85 3736-84 3736-111 28' 56' 27' 3736-61 3736-36 3736-24 3721-29 3721-19 3736-67 35' 3736-37 3736-23 3721-31 3721-54 3721-45A 1 48' 3721-15A 3721-16 3736-110 3736-15 3636-74 3636-75 3636-76 3636-77 3636-78A 3736-18 3736-17 3721-14 3736-85 3736-83A 3736-1? 3736-83 3721-13 37' 3721-35 3736-114 3721-88 3736-116 3636-119 3721-6 3721-10 3721-11 3736-1 3736-2 3736-3A 3736-4 3636-74 3736-7 3736-120 15' 25' 28' 54' 50' 320m 320m 340m 340m 330m Min R: 180m 3720-7 3720-1 3720-5 3720-6 3719-10 3719-9 3719-8 33' 35' 3719-11 Key to Property Ownership Caltrans Vacant lot William Wilson Project Construction in Progress Developed Other Architectural Resource (Jan 1995) 2 1 3719-7 3719-1 3719-17 3719-3 3719-5 3719-6 3738-11 3738-12 11' 44' 3718-12 3 3738-4 3739-7 3739-4 3718-25 3718-26 3718-27 3739-2 3739-6 3739-8 Guy Place

0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 22' 23' 51' 0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 500m 600m Clementina Street 3736-29 3721-51 3721-50 3721-25 3721-23 3736-97 3736-96 3736-65 3721-22 3721-52 3721-48 3721-49 3721-47 3736-98 3736-93 3736-94 3736-66 3736-64 Folsom Street 3721-21 3736-27 3721-27A 3736-100 3736-99 3736-93 3736-62 3721-28 3736-92 3736-35 3736-25 3721-53 3721-46 3721-20 3736-101 3736-102 65' 70' Existing deck (approx) 3736-91 3736-89 3736-88 3736-107 3736-86 3736-85 3736-84 3736-111 28' 56' 27' 3736-61 3736-36 3736-24 3721-29 3721-19 3736-67 35' 3736-37 3736-23 3721-31 3721-54 3721-45A 1 48' 3721-15A 3721-16 3736-110 3736-15 3636-74 3636-75 3636-76 3636-77 3636-78A 3736-18 3736-17 3721-14 3736-85 3736-83A 3736-1? 3736-83 3721-13 37' 3721-35 3736-114 3721-88 3736-116 3636-119 3721-6 3721-10 3721-11 3736-1 3736-2 3736-3A 3736-4 3636-74 3736-7 3736-120 15' 25' 28' 54' 50' 280m Min R: 200m 3720-7 3720-1 3720-5 3720-6 3719-10 3719-9 3719-8 33' 35' 3719-11 Key to Property Ownership Caltrans Vacant lot William Wilson Project Construction in Progress Developed Other Architectural Resource (Jan 1995) 2 1 3719-7 3719-1 3719-17 3719-3 3719-5 3719-6 3738-11 3738-12 11' 44' 3718-12 3 3738-4 3739-7 3739-4 3718-25 3718-26 3718-27 3739-2 3739-6 3739-8 Guy Place

0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 22' 23' 51' 0 10 50m 100m 200m 400m 500m 600m Clementina Street 3736-29 3721-51 3721-50 3721-25 3721-23 3736-97 3736-96 3736-65 3721-22 3721-52 3721-48 3721-49 3721-47 3736-98 3736-93 3736-94 3736-66 3736-64 Folsom Street 3721-21 3736-27 3721-27A 3736-100 3736-99 3736-93 3736-62 3721-28 3736-92 3736-35 3736-25 3721-53 3721-46 3721-20 3736-101 3736-102 65' 70' Existing deck (approx) 3736-91 3736-89 3736-88 3736-107 3736-86 3736-85 3736-84 3736-111 28' 56' 27' 3736-61 3736-36 3736-24 3721-29 3721-19 3736-67 35' 3736-37 3736-23 3721-31 3721-54 3721-45A 1 48' 3721-15A 3721-16 3736-110 3736-15 3636-74 3636-75 3636-76 3636-77 3636-78A 3736-18 3736-17 3721-14 3736-85 3736-83A 3736-1? 3736-83 3721-13 37' 3721-35 3736-114 3721-88 3736-116 3636-119 3721-6 3721-10 3721-11 3736-1 3736-2 3736-3A 3736-4 3636-74 3736-7 3736-120 15' 25' 28' 54' 50' 250m 180m+60m 180m 200m 200m 230m Min R: 200m Platform R: 3720-7 3720-1 3720-5 3720-6 3719-10 3719-9 3719-8 33' 35' 3719-11 Key to Property Ownership Caltrans Vacant lot William Wilson Project Construction in Progress Developed Other Architectural Resource (Jan 1995) 2 1 3719-7 3719-1 3719-17 3719-3 3719-5 3719-6 3738-11 3738-12 11' 44' 3718-12 3 3738-4 3739-7 3739-4 3718-25 3718-26 3718-27 3739-2 3739-6 3739-8 Guy Place