Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County



Similar documents
Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

SCHNEIDER CREEK REMEDIATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Neversink River East Branch

Appendix C. Project Opportunities. Middle Twisp River (RM )

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

Homeowner s Guide to Drainage

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

INNOVATIONS IN STREAM RESTORATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN MEETING FLOOD CAPACITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS ON SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK 1

Outlet stabilization structure

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

Penticton Creek May 4, 2015 Council Meeting

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT

Frequently-Asked Questions about Floodplains and Flood Insurance FLOOD INSURANCE

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

Mission Reach Self-Guided Tour Mission Concepción Portal Loop and Mission Reach Phase II Embayment Loop

WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING DESIGN LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RIVER RESTORATION.

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

Harris County Flood Control District. Policy, Criteria, and Procedure Manual

Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes. Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute

Town of Elkton & Cecil Soil Conservation District Checklist for Joint Agency Review Stormwater Management / Erosion and Sediment Control

Mitigating Post-Fire Runoff from the Schultz Fire. ASCE/ASHE 2015 Annual State Conference

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Green Spaces to Improve Waterways and Communities

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

Salt Lake County June 2010 Flooding and Restoration

Plumas Watershed Forum. Review of Ongoing Projects. Updated 10/1/008

Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

City of Austin Stream Restoration Program Mid-Atlantic Stream Restoration Conference, Rocky Gap, MD November 2011

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

SECTION 5.4 LOGJAM REMOVAL AND RIVER RESTORATION. Overview. Logjam Removal Using Heavy. Tools. Machinery. Large-Scale River Restoration

FIRST RESPONSE: STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION OF A BMP FAILURE

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

SECTION 5. Sediment Control Measures

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

Little Thompson Watershed Restoration Coalition (LTWRC) Floodplain Rehabilitation Planning Grant Application (Priority 2 of 3)

Concepts for Post Flood River Corridor Restoration

PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING THURSDAY APRIL 30, 2015

Tookany Creek Flood Damage Reduction Feasibility Study Section 205 Continuing Authorities Program

Moving Small Mountains Vesuvius Dam Rehab

Crossing creeks Stream crossings on farms

How To Fix A Flood Control System In South Lakewood

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

EPR Exempt Flood Risk Activities: descriptions and conditions

Final. Contact person: Colin Whittemore Aurecon Centre 1 Century City Drive Waterford Precinct, Century City Cape Town, South Africa

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

ATTACHMENT 9. I. Description of the Project and its Relationship to Other Projects in the Proposal

BEACH STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION EASEMENT

APPENDICES G) DETAILED BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Greater Los Angeles County Region

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010

720 Contour Grading. General. References. Resources. Definitions


Transcription:

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project City of Fremont, Alameda County

Agenda Background Why are proposed improvements necessary? Proposed project components Challenges Construction schedule/phasing

Lake Elizabeth Gomes Elementary Fremont Golf Park Gomes Park Background (Existing Conditions/Project Reaches): Mission Creek between Lemos Lane and Lake Elizabeth is inadequate to convey the FEMA 100-year design peak flow At Reach 1, the golf course floods; the existing SFPUC abandoned 48 pipe is currently an obstruction to flow. At Reach 2, the 100-year flows overtop the existing top-of-banks into residential areas At Reach 3, the 100-year flows constricted at the undersized culverts at Lemos Lane overtop onto the street and flow into Gomes Park and Gomes Elementary School.

Why proposed improvements are necessary Increase flood conveyance in the creek to meet FEMA current 100- year (one percent annual chance) design storm requirement and minimize future potential flooding Construct the improvements before FEMA mapping and updates of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). If the floodplain is mapped on the FIRM, the affected property owners (with federal backed mortgages) would be required by law to purchase flood insurance (estimated at $2,500/year) Stabilize eroded slopes using biotechnical bank stabilization control methods, to minimize sediment deposition downstream Improve riparian habitat function Replanting trees and vegetation with native species

Project Components: Reach 1 IMPROVE CONFLUENCES WITH M-1, L-2 REPLACE BRIDGE NEW TOP NEW TOE NEW WETLAND TERRACES NORTH AND SOUTH OF CHANNEL ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION CLASS 2 AB Widen the channel create low-flow terraces, set-back banks Retain golf course as floodplain Replace golf course pedestrian/vehicular bridge Remove abandoned 48 SFPUC water pipeline Improve the confluences at Lines L-2 and M-1 Create new wetlands REMOVE ABANDONED SFPUC PIPE

Reach 1 Cross-section

Reach 1 New Features Existing Golf Course Bridge Proposed Golf Course Bridge

Project Components: Reach 2 New North Wall LOW-FLOW CHANNEL AND TERRACES New South Wall CITY DETENTION BASIN REPLACE ASPHALT PATH Existing V-shaped gabion mattress-lined channel will be replaced with vertical channel retaining walls to provide increased width for the channel, earthen bottom with meandering low flow channel and terraced floodplains; New low flow channels and terraces; Relocation of asphalt pathway;

Reach 2 Typical Cross-section (Looking Upstream) Existing V-shaped Gabion Mattress Lined Channel (Looking Downstream)

Reach 2 New Low Retaining Wall Sample Vertical Channel Walls Finishes

Project Components: Reach 3 NEW PATH ROUTED TO TOP OF BERM NORTH BERM TOE NORTH BERM CREST ROCK WEIR SET-BACK BANK WITH COIR LOG TOE Existing Creek (Looking Downstream) SOUTH BERM TOE REPLACE BRIDGE SOUTH BERM TOP NEW PATH ROUTED TO TOP OF BERM Work in this reach minimizes impacts to the channel to retain the well-developed riparian corridor Low, contoured earthen berms proposed for outside the existing top-of-banks to contain the 100-year flow Existing Gomes Park footbridge which currently obstructs 100-year flow will be replaced with single span bridge Existing AC Pathway (Looking Downstream) Biotechnical bank stabilization at bank erosion sites along meander bends Rock gradient control weirs to stabilize longitudinal profile New maintenance access on north side from Lemos Lane

Reach 3 Cross-section City park pathways where they intersect new berms will be replaced and will run along the crest of the berms. South berm was re-routed south of the playground to retain open space for sports practices in the park NORTH BERM SOUTH BERM LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

Reach 3 Gomes Footbridge Existing footbridge will be replaced with single-span steel bridge

Reach 3 Bank Stabilization Existing bank erosion will be stabilized by setting the topof-bank back at two outside meander bends Biotechnical coir logs will be installed at bank toes of setback portions

Reach 3 Rock Weirs Rock weirs are proposed for gradient control between Reaches 2 and 3

Tree Removal and Replacement 15 trees to be removed from Reach 1 8 trees to be removed from Reach 2 34 trees to be removed from Reach 3

Reach 3 Concept

Preliminary Park Landscaping Plan

Challenges Construction safety Constrained Right-of-Way Available construction period Lots of major construction activities within small constrained areas Maintain golf course operations Maintain park usage to the extent feasible Adjacent to Elementary School Adjacent to residential homes Lead time for pre-fabricated bridges

Anticipated Construction Schedule Advertisement (Pending receipt of all environmental permits): January 13, 2015 Bid Opening: February 24, 2015 Award: March 17, 2015 On-site Construction to begin: April 2015 Project Completion: December 2015 Entire work period: April December 2015 Construction Duration: 130 Working Days (Mondays thru Fridays) Construction Hours: 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM Construction Parking will be confined to Lemos Lane and will not interfere with school drop-off and pick-up times Traffic control may be needed on west side of Lemos Lane and will not interfere with school drop-off and pick-up times (9 am -2 pm only

Construction Fencing

Stakeholders Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District City of Fremont Parks and Recreation Fremont Park Golf Course San Francisco Public Utility Commission Union Pacific Railroad California Department of Fish and Wildlife U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regional Water Quality Control Board

Questions Project Engineer: Ms. Chien Wang, P.E. Office Phone No.: 510-670-5552 E-mail: chien@acpwa.org