Ecosystem Services, Wetlands and Houston s Growth. Jim Lester



Similar documents
Tradeoffs of Ecosystem Services from Wetlands in the Houston Region

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Linking Wetland Alteration to Coastal Flooding: predictors, consequences, and policy implications

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Urban Ecosystem Analysis For the Houston Gulf Coast Region Calculating the Value of Nature

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

Aligning Natural and Built Infrastructure for

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

TROPICAL STORM ALLISON. Prepared by: John P. Ivey, PE, CFM Halff Associates, Inc. ASCE

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

SSPEED Center Phase III: Developing a Houston- Galveston Area Protection System (H-GAPS)

The Potential for Houston s Bayou Greenways

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

The Value of New Jersey s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

Flood Damage Prevention in Delaware County, NY

$200 Billion. Ecosystem Services: The Gridlock Breaker. Four Types of Capital. Built Capital Social Capital Human Capital Natural Capital

Long Term Challenges for Tidal Estuaries

Climate Change and Sri Lanka. Ajith Silva Director/ Policy and Planning Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Sri Lanka

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

SARASOTA COUNTY Dedicated to Quality Service

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

Wetlands and Climate Change: Considerations for Wetland Program Managers

EPA Trends for wastewater Treatment in California

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

What is A Triple Bottom Line Economic Analysis of Improving Urban River Quality?

Future of our coasts: Potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance ecosystem and community resilience Ariana Sutton-Grier

Looking beyond Ecological Functions to the Value of Ecosystem Services in the Urban Regions around Houston

SECTION 3.2 CLIMATE AND PRECIPITATION

Corralling the evidence about the value of Green Infrastructure. Martin Moss. Senior Advisor Green Infrastructure Operations England.

Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services Assessment. Executive Summary. Executive Summary

Saving Constituents Money on Flood Insurance Under FEMA s Community Rating System (CRS)

Triple Bottom Line Discussion. Scott Struck, Ph.D. Senior Professional Geosyntec Consultants

Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Emphasis on Groundwater May 4, 2004

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

How To Help Oceans

It s hard to avoid the word green these days.

Use of Green Roofs to Meet New Development Runoff Requirements. Greg Davis Nov. 8, 2007

CWSRF Project Descriptions and Examples for Green Project Reserve

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Carbon Credits: An Opportunity for Forest Landowners. Hughes Simpson Texas Forest Service

A Presentation to the Houston Hispanic Architects and Engineers

Urban Ecosystem Services Seattle s Urban Forest

case study 7: south east queensland healthy waterways partnership

Richmond City s Green Infrastructure Assessment

Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007

Houston-Galveston Area Council. Disaster Recovery Housing Needs Assessment. Round 2 Phase 2 Funding

ESRI_UC_2015_No843_Integrating Flood Risk Management and Salmon Habitat Restoration_CampbellSW

Urban Ecosystem Analysis Atlanta Metro Area Calculating the Value of Nature

1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD TTY Users Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd

Triple Bottom Line Analysis for Green Infrastructure A Case Study 2012 ARCADIS

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Biodiversity Concepts

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

Ecosystem services in grasslands: evidence, trade-offs and restoration. James Bullock NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

The built environment : a policy framework for climate adaptation

CAPS Landscape Metrics November 2011

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

Quantifying LID Triple Bottom Line Benefits Milwaukee Case Study Kimberly Brewer, A.I.C.P. Tetra Tech

Association of State Flood Managers Annual Conference Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Biodiversity Action at Holcim Canada

Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon. fact SHEET

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500, , ,040-39%

Funding for this project provided by Washington Department of Ecology Grants G & G

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees

Tony Wong & Vivek Chaudhri

Tropical Storm Allison 2001

State of Green Infrastructure in the Gauteng City-Region

Transcription:

Ecosystem Services, Wetlands and Houston s Growth Jim Lester

Definitions (MEA 2005) Ecosystem: a dynamic complex of plant, animal, and microorganism communities and the nonliving environment interacting in a functional unit Ecosystem services: benefits people receive from ecosystems including various functions, products, stocks and flows of goods and services

MEA CLASSIFICATION of ES Provisioning provides direct material and consumable benefits Food and fiber Timber and minerals Fuels Medicinal resources Cultural Services provides direct social and spiritual benefits Recreation Spiritual and historic Science and education Regulation provides direct benefits to support and maintain control of ecosystems Climate regulation Waste treatment Water regulation Nutrient regulation Supporting - provides direct benefits to support and maintain control of ecosystems Primary production Nutrient cycling Water cycling

Classification of Final Ecosystem Goods and Services (EPA)- Wetlands and Estuaries Ecosystem Attributes Human beneficiaries Water quality Agriculture Water amount Industry Plants and animals Transportation Sensory experience Government agencies Residential Recreational interests Cultural groups Subsistence users

Value of Ecosystem Changes? Temporal and spatial scale for valuation Local, regional or global Episodic, short term, long term Values from market, risk avoidance or hedonic behavior Wetland to farmland or golf course, ES Δ?

Wetland Services vs. Land Value Major positive benefits of urban wetlands (no provisioning) Stormwater retention (regulatory; risk avoidance) Nutrient and pollutant assimilation (regulatory; cost avoidance) Habitat (regulatory, cultural; cost avoidance) Heat island amelioration (regulatory; risk and cost avoidance) Major issues with urban wetland protection Loss of land value if undeveloped Increased cost of development and infrastructure if wetlands protected Lack of regulatory and nonregulatory frameworks for protection at various levels of government

LU/LC Map of Houston 2010

Floodplains and Wetland Loss

Houston Region and Wetlands Harris County is currently 16.7% floodplain Reduced by development Neighboring counties are 21% 46% floodplain From 1996 2010 Lower Galveston Bay Watershed lost 13,911 acres of wetlands to development (0.15% per year) Texas Coast palustrine wetlands (prairie complexes) Typical size 0.5 ac 25 ac Typical depth 3 in 16 in Typical palustrine wetland stores 76% - 93% of annual input

Prairie Pothole Wetland Complexes

How Palustrine Wetlands Work Functional Analysis of Local Palustrine Wetland in 2008-2009

Methods of Quantifying ES Physical model of storm water retention Cost avoidance for construction of storage Value of avoided property damage Ecological production functions Value of vegetation growth in nutrient, carbon and pollutant sequestration

Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy Ecology Letters Volume 18, Issue 1, pages 108-118, 14 NOV 2014 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12389 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12389/full#ele12389-fig-0003

Valuing Flood Reduction High Monthly Rainfall Amounts July 2005 = 12.96 inches October 2006 = 19.26 inches April 2009 = 15.61 inches April 18, 2009 flood 5 deaths 350 homes flooded $3.5 million in damages

Wetland Permits and Flooding (Brody/TAMUG) 11,149 Section 404 permits in Texas coastal counties 1991 2003 42% affecting palustrine wetlands Limited protection (2001 and 2006 Supreme Court rulings) Permits in 100 year floodplain in USACE Galveston District 1991 2003: 32% - 41% annually Each permit on average increases flood damage by $212 per flood (urban permits are costliest)

Wetland Permits in Texas Coastal Counties

Insured Flood Losses (NWF: Higher Ground 1998) FEMA Database 78 95 (Claudette 79 and Alicia 83) Harris County had 3,681 properties with repetitive flood loss 2.9 losses per property over 18 years $211.5 million paid out (no uninsured losses included) How much less if wetlands protected?

Cost Equivalence Scenario 1 Acre of wetland sold for $300,000 Converted to 6 houses @ 2,000 sq ft Flood event with water in homes to 1 foot Average damage $52,000/house (FEMA) Property loss = $312,000 But the model for Houston does not exist

Wetland Protection Conundrum Urban wetlands retain storm water and provide other ecosystem services Urban land has high value for development Undeveloped floodplain land in Harris County is $40K to $1M per acre High land value connected to high wetland conversion activity Profit from wetland conversion results in costs from flood damage Profits are immediate, losses are long term, episodic

Demand for Land Wetland Loss WATERSHED NAME Developed Lands in 2010 as % of Total Land Area Wetlands lost to development since 1996 Avg Home Price (HAR) Real Estate Market Trinity River 3% 0% 154300 Liberty Cedar Bayou 12% 4% 167600 Baytown Dickinson Bayou 34% 13% 198000 Dickinson Armand-Taylor Bayou 64% 13% 228600 77058 Sims Bayou 78% 21% 98800-168000 77017, 77061 Buffalo Bayou 90% 22% 177000-2000000 77084, 77024 Brays Bayou 94% 52% 190000-1000000 77074, 77005 Lower Galveston Bay Watershed Avg 43% 13%

Economic Value of Palustrine Wetlands Economic cost of wetland conversion is cumulative and long term Market value and ES value are greatest in intensively developed area Flood avoidance can be improved by protection of ecosystem services Land development codes and protected areas have highest negative correlation to flood damage Land use decisions currently favor economics of wetland destruction and structural flood mitigation

HARCresearch.org HARC (härk), n. an independent research hub helping people thrive and nature flourish.