Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices



Similar documents
Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. ADA Compliance Training. Local Programs Engineer FHWA NJ Division

ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR DESIGNING YOUR SAFE ROUTES

Best Practices in Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding in the Washington Region Survey Results


How To Improve Safety

How To Design A Bicycle Path In California

City of Auburn Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for Curb Ramps, Sidewalks, and Pedestrian Signals ADA TRANSITION PLAN

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

Surface Transportation Program (STP)

In 2005, the City of Pasadena, CA, USA, with the support of consultants,

VERTICAL SPEED CONTROL DEVICES

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs

3.1 Historical Considerations

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Chapter Forty-seven. RURAL TWO-LANE/MULTILANE STATE HIGHWAYS (New Construction/Reconstruction) BUREAU OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT MANUAL

BEST PRACTICES. Smart Transportation is a key concept for the Paoli Roadway Improvement Project.

SAN DIEGO - A BICYCLE FRIENDLY CITY

Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High

Bond Release Process for New Subdivision Developments in Fairfax County

The Bond Release Process for New Subdivision Developments: An Overview for Homeowners Associations DRAFT Revised

Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design Safe, Smart and Defendable

DRAFT. Light Rail Corridor Shared-Use Path Study. September Prepared for: Prepared by:

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS

ADA POST INSPECTION CHECKLIST. Job No. Route County Location

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

Corridor Goals and Objectives

APPENDIX G. California Coastal Commission & Conservancy Accessibility Standards

MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS Water, Sewer, Stormwater and Streetscape Improvements

Temporary Traffic Control for Building and Maintaining Single and Multi-Lane Roundabouts

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix


How To Manage Transportation Asset Management

Competitive Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Exhibit A Scope of Work

Evaluation of the Shared-Use Arrow

Pima Regional Remote Sensing Program

EXPERIENCE WITH GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) / MAPPING

CITY OF ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks

City of Wichita, Kansas Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan Main Library Address

In The Court of Appeal State of California SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 8

SECTION 6: TRANSPORTATION

PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING THURSDAY APRIL 30, 2015

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

Safety Evidence for Bicycling

DESCRIPTION OF WORK:

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

8.1.3 General Design Guidelines. The following guidelines shall be used when designing inlets along a street section:

Safety Engineering Policy Memorandum

HERS_IN. HIGHWAY ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM (for) INDIANA. AASHTO Transportation Estimator Association Conference October 16, 2001

Engineering Standard

Red Wing Bridge Project. PAC #5/TAC #8 Meeting July 18, 2013

FIBER-OPTIC CABLE PLAN CHECK

SIGHT DISTANCE. Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E. Traffex Engineers Inc. WHY IS SIGHT DISTANCE SO IMPORTANT?

CHAPTER 10 SCHOOL AREA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY

Guidelines for Fiber Optic Cable Permits

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIGNAGE, STRIPING, AND LIGHTING TOWNSHIP OF STANFORD

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS

Transportation Policy and Design Strategies. Freight Intensive. Level of Freight Presence

References. Associates, Vandewalle &. Stateline Area Bike and Pedestrian System Plan: SLATS, 2004.

APPENDIX B: TRAIL DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS

Preliminary Plan Application and Checklist

Summary Report TRAILS AND GOLF COURSES: Best Practices on Design and Management

0.0 Curb Radii Guidelines Version 1.0.2

Alternatives Presentation Meeting Middlebury WCRS(23)

9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. April 24, 2015

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

BIKEWAY TYPOLOGIES COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHOP JULY John Cock, Principal/Planner Alta Planning + Design

Collingwood Trails Network Management Guidelines. Parks, Recreation & Culture Department

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

Accessible Public Rights-of-Way planning and designing for alterations

PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT February 23, Summary. Background Information PREPARED FOR THE PLAN COMMISSION. Legistar File ID # 36810

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

720 Contour Grading. General. References. Resources. Definitions

Task 1 Project Management and Project Organization Work Plan

Update on Previous Related Transportation Enhancement Grants

Types of Data. Features. Getting Started. Integrated Roadway Asset Management System

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STREETSCAPE AND IMPROVEMENT GUIDELINES

Comprehensive Plan Policies that support Infill and Mixed Use

Transcription:

Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices Session Presenters: Kristin Maravilla, Planner/Designer Masters in Landscape Architecture (UC Berkeley) Masters in City and Regional Planning (UC Berkeley) BA Environmental Studies (UC Santa Barbara) Brian Burchfield, Designer BLA Landscape Architecture (Cal Poly San Luis Obispo) 2012 California Trails and Greenways Conference

Presentation Outline 1. Introduction 2. Overview of Current Guidelines 3. Grey Areas 4. Applying the Guidelines 5. References

1. Introduction Trail Design Guidelines Seek to: Improve safety Improved user functionality and enjoyment Ease maintenance and management Limit liability

2. Overview of Current Guidelines U.S. Department of Transportation National MUTCD --> CA MUTCD California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) CA Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices CA MUTCD) CA Highway Design Manual (HDM) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities

2. Overview of Current Guidelines Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access U.S. Access Board (ADAAG) Draft Final Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas Proposed Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) U.S. Department of Justice ADA Standards for Accessible Design

Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Caltrans) Projects w/in Caltrans ROW or using Caltrans funding Items addressed: Signs (application, placement) Pavement markings (word messages, symbols, arrows, reflectorization, patterns and colors on shared-use paths, demarcating obstacles, dimensions) Traffic signals and crossing beacons (application, placement)

Highway Design Manual (Caltrans) Apply to transportation facilities Items addressed: width, clearances, grade, separation from highways, design speed, sight distance, horizontal and vertical curves

Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (AASHTO) Voluntary Items addressed: Separation from roadways, width, clearance, design speed, grade, sight distance, intersections, signing, marking, drainage)

Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access (FHWA, 1999) Accessibility guidelines and practices, and construction and maintenance techniques have evolved since this report. More current information is available in other reports and guidance. Section: 5. Trail Design for Access

Draft Final Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas (2009) Federal land management agencies and non-federal entities that construct or alter facilities on Federal lands on behalf of the Federal government Provisions for trails address surface; clear tread width; passing spaces; obstacles; openings; slopes; resting intervals; protruding objects; and gates and barriers Clear tread width: 36 min Passing space: 5 x 5 every 1000 Tread Obstacles: 2 max. protrusion Openings: < ½

Slope: Trails vs. Shared-use Paths in ADAAG Guidelines Trails Outdoorrecreation trailsmust reflect environmental considerations of terrain, maintenance, erosion, and surface as well as constructability and use. Slopes up to 12% are permitted, but steep slopes are limited in length. Shared-use Paths [still In development] Multi-use routes that depart from roadway alignments should be constructed to be accessible (5% currently proposed) Full ADAAG compliance helps projects remain eligible for state/federal transportation funds

ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010) State and local government facilities, public accommodations, and commercial facilities to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities Items Addressed: slope, cross slope, clearances, clear width As of March 15, 2012, compliance with the 2010 Standards became required for new construction and alterations.

Proposed Public Right-of- Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) Pedestrian facilities constructed or altered in the public right-of-way by state and local government Where pedestrian access routes are contained within a street or highway right-of-way, the grade of the pedestrian access route is permitted to equal the general grade established for the adjacent street or highway

Conditional Exceptions maximum extent feasible Terrain Compliance would fundamentally alter the function or purpose of the facility or setting Compliance is precluded by the: Endangered Species Act; National Environmental Policy Act; National Historic Preservation Act; Wilderness Act; or Other Federal, State, or local laws. Where full compliance is not feasible, document it and leave an obvious paper trail

3. Grey Areas What don t the guidelines fully address? Separation of trail users Traffic control/safety Wayfinding for trails Enforcement Access control (bollards)

4. Applying the Guidelines and Addressing the Grey Areas American River Trail Napa Valley Vine Trail Santa Monica Beach Path Source: http://vinetrail.org/

American River Parkway Trail Assessment 23-mile trail corridor from Downtown Sacramento to Sacramento County Limit Trail assessment of: Curve radii Sacramento, CA Signage (location, rules of the path) Striping (type, location, rules of the path) Bollards (type and location)

American River Parkway Trail Assessment Inventory Process Basemaps created utilizing Google Earth and GIS Imagery and data

American River Parkway Trail Assessment Toured corridor via bicycle Photographed and documented: Intersection controls and crossing treatments Trail curve-radii Wayfinding signage User traffic control signage Inventory Process

American River Parkway Trail Assessment The assessment compared the existing features against current trail standards Caltrans CA MUTCD and HDM AASHTO s Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities Rails to Trails Conservancy s Trails for the 21st Century Grey Areas Rules of the path Bollards Analysis

American River Parkway Trail Assessment Recommendations Provided intersection-specific recommendations Photo of Existing Conditions

American River Parkway Trail Assessment Recommendations Identified areas where curve radii did not conform

Napa Valley Vine Trail Alignment Study Study Area 4.5-mile corridor along Devlin Road in Napa County Airport Industrial Area Scope Identify the most feasible/least constrained side of the street for a path, based on general review of conditions

Napa Valley Vine Trail Alignment Study

Napa Valley Vine Trail Alignment Study

Napa Valley Vine Trail: Road Crossings

Santa Monica Bike and Pedestrian Beach Path Ground Graphics and Wayfinding Plans Approx. 3.5-mile path Owned by LA County Operated/maintained by City of Santa Monica Trail assessment of: Signage (type, working, location, rules of the path, wayfinding) Striping (type, location, rules of the path, ground graphics)

Santa Monica Bike and Pedestrian Beach Path Ground Graphics and Wayfinding Plans Inventory Process Created base sheets with high res aerials in AutoCAD Added City s sign inventory Field-reviewed path on foot Photographed and documented: Intersection controls and crossing treatments Wayfinding signage Pavement markings

Santa Monica Bike and Pedestrian Beach Path Ground Graphics and Wayfinding Plans Analysis Challenge to create signing and striping that s understood by diverse group of path users (use less words and more symbols) MUTCD wasn t always applicable. Mixed and matched different symbols to be used on path

Santa Monica Bike and Pedestrian Beach Path Ground Graphics and Wayfinding Plans Recommendations

Santa Monica Bike and Pedestrian Beach Path Ground Graphics and Wayfinding Plans Recommendations

Santa Monica Bike and Pedestrian Beach Path Ground Graphics and Wayfinding Plans Recommendations Rules of the path Wayfinding

Santa Monica Bike and Pedestrian Beach Path Ground Graphics and Wayfinding Plans Recommendations Crossing treatments Speed reduction

5. References ADA Draft Final Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas (including trails, trailheads, and viewing areas). Effective 3/15/12: http://www.accessboard.gov/outdoor/draft-final.htm ADA Shared-Use Path Guidelines [In Development]: http://www.access-board.gov/sup.htm ADA Public Rights-of-Way Guidelines: http://www.accessboard.gov/prowac/index.htm Draft Final Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas: http://www.access-board.gov/outdoor/draft-final.htm ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010): http://www.ada.gov/2010adastandards_index.htm

5. References Proposed Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG): http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/nprm.htm AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities: https://bookstore.transportation.org/item_details.aspx?id =104(for purchase) California Highway Design Manual: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/hdm/hdmtoc.htm California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/signtech/mutcdsupp/ FHWA Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sidewalks/

5. Additional Resources American Trails http://www.americantrails.org/ Bondurant, J., Thompson, L., et al. (2009). Trail Planning for California Communities. Flink, C.A., Searns, R.M., Olka, K. (2001). Trails for the Twenty-First Century: Planning, Design, and Management Manual for Multi-use Trails. Flink, C.A., Searns, R.M. (1993). Greenways: A Guide to Planning, Design, and Development. Rails-to-Trails Conservancy http://www.railstotrails.org/index.html

Questions? Contact Info Alta Planning + Design Kristin Maravilla, Planner/Designer kristinmaravilla@altaplanning.com Brian Burchfield, Designer brianburchfield@altaplannging.com 510-540-5008 25609 th Street, Suite 212 Berkeley, CA 94710 www.altaplanning.com