Application Form Part A



Similar documents
ANNEX Removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links; Ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run;

Financing the European Mobility Network with the Connecting Europe Facility

The key elements of the TEN-T guidelines

CEF Transport (TEN-T) 2014: EU funding to improve cross-border transport connections

ACTION PLAN

TEN-T guidelines and CEF

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

The implementation of the TEN-T policy

SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME. Terms of reference

Trade & Transport Corridors. European Projects & Initiatives

The logistics sector s view on the infrastructure in Central-Eastern European Member States Dr László Mosóczi Chairman of HUNGRAIL

THE ROUTE MAP TO A CONNECTED EUROPE

3 RBC INTERFACE TO INTERLOCKINGS IN FINLAND

European Strategy 2050 TEN-T Methodology: Italian TEN-T network proposal

AGREEMENT REGARDING THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF RAIL FREIGHT CORRIDOR RHINE-ALPINE

Investment projects on PKP Polish Railway Lines network

1. Towards the North Sea-Baltic Corridor work plan

This is why the Swedish Transport Administration was formed

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project

Florida Transportation Commission: A Meeting of the Modes

BaltMet Network. Mayors of major metropolises in the Baltic Sea Region unified for the competitiveness and innovation of the Region

BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE TO STRENGTHEN EUROPE'S ECONOMY. Table of contents

Development of a Concept for the Public Transport Interconnectivity for Savaria International Airport. Report

The results of studies drawn up for the development of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Core Network Corridor

IQ-C Action plan for rail freight corridor Rotterdam-Genoa

Jan Schönbeck, Head of Strategic Contracts and Procurement. Seminar in Berlin 13 June 2012

2015 CEF Transport Calls for Proposals COUNTRY FICHE. Czech Republic

A Greener Transport System in Denmark. Environmentally Friendly and Energy Efficient Transport

Thailand s Logistics

The Transport Infrastructure Context of Northern Sweden

Measure 9: Updating the interoperability directives on high-speed and conventional railway networks First page:

Project TALSINKIFIX. Pre-Feasibility study of Helsinki-Tallinn fixed link project. Part-financed by European Union

Helsinki-Vantaa Airport. Kamppi

Success with three networks: SBB Infrastructure. InnoTrans 2012.

The Dutch Railway System. Logistics & Railway Infrastructure Forum NL Indonesia April 30 th 2015

Railway Reform in South East Europe and Turkey: On the Right Track?

ERTMS for a competitive railway

Cefic Position on Intermodal Transport Network Development

Development of Shanghai Integrated Transport ( ) XIAO Hui and GU Yu

NETWORKS FOR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT

Transport Infographics

DECISION No 120/2014. on the implementing provisions for Regulations No 3/2014, No 4/2014 and No 5/2014 of the Committee of the Regions

Project TALSINKIFIX. Pre-Feasibility study of Helsinki-Tallinn fixed link project. Part-financed by European Union

Union for Mediterranean Motorways of the Sea Initiative: a way to a re-equilibrium in the Mediterranean. Transport and Urban Development Division

NETWORK INDUSTRIES TRANSPORT

INTEGRATED COMMUNICATION AND TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY SOME STUDY CASES 2. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS: A VITAL NATIONAL RESOURCE

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON BOARD CROXLEY RAIL LINK PROPOSED TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT ORDER

Energy and. Resources

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT

CITY OF HELSINKI. Introducing Major Urban Development Projects EXPO REAL, München, October

Demand for Long Distance Travel

OPPORTUNITIES IN RUSSIAN ON-LINE MARKET AND LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS FOR DELIVERIES

usage of these types of fuels with production price far higher then diesel and petrol, is also a measure. We can say that in Bulgaria there are

Transport trends and challenges in the Russian Federation

China Railways Development, Financing and Challenges

City of Helsinki City Planning Department. Light rail. Public transport for the future Helsinki.

The Danish Transport System. Facts and Figures

Railway simulation using OpenTrack in Finland

URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLANNING IN TEHRAN AND THE OUTCOME OF THE IMPLEMENTED BRT LINES

November Transforming Sydney. 60% more trains. Faster, more frequent services. No timetable just turn up and go

Dallas-Fort Worth Area Major Transportation Projects

NELI-Programme. Kymenlaakso Logistics Development Programme Raija Salo, March 2009

Port of Narvik. The Gateway to the Arctic PORT LOGISTICS: RAIL-ROAD-SEA-AIR. No draft restrictions. Sheltered waters. Ice-free all year round

CTCS Chinese Train Control System

MELBOURNE METRO RAIL NEWSLETTER

How To Improve The Rail Transport System In European Union

WATERWAYS in Finland

TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF AZERBAIJAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR GLOBAL LOGISTICS AS A BASE FOR REGIONAL INTEGRATION. INVESTMENT PROJECTS.

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

11. Monitoring Performance monitoring in LTP2

What does mandatory shore power in EU mean?

Load Balancing Using a Co-Simulation/Optimization/Control Approach. Petros Ioannou

Request for CTF Project Preparation Grant (PPG)

The Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management of the Netherlands

Airports, Intermodal and Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) projects: Recommendations to Project Beneficiaries

Eliminating Gridlock Through Effective Travel Demand Management and Urban Mobility Strategies

Guidelines for the Application of Asset Management in Railway Infrastructure Organisations

THE LIVORNO PLATFORM

ROADMAP SUMMARY LONG- DISTANCE FREIGHT

main type of locomotive in use, but over half of those had surpassed their durable lifespan. China Afghanistan Project Sites Nepal

Ministry of Infrastructure Warsaw, r..

DaGoB Meeting Helsinki. Telematics Solutions for the Finnish Railways

Transcription:

A1 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M (26195427) MAP Call 2014 F01 Priority 1: (F01) Pre-identified projects on the Core Network corridors Railways Inland Waterways and Ports Roads Maritime Ports Priority 2: (F01) Pre-identified projects on the other sections of the Core Network Railways Inland Waterways and Ports Roads Maritime Ports Priority 3: (F01) Rail interoperability Railway system compliance with interoperability and Safety Directives Rail Freight Corridors Technical Specifications for Interoperability and Safety Directives Priority 4: (F01) European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) ERTMS track-side deployment ERTMS on-board deployment Simplification and facilitation of placing in operation ERTMS training ERTMS specifications maintenance Operational rules Proposal type Please select the proposal type: Study and Work Work Study Page 1 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

General Information On The Proposal Title of the proposed action The Planning of the Core Network Railway Corridors in Helsinki Transport mode Rail (Conventional) Network type Core Core network corridor Scandinavian - Pre-identified core network Helsinki Mediterranean corridor section Consideration of PPP NO Co-financing type SINGLE Co-financing percentage 50.0 Start date of the action 19/12/2014 End date of the action 31/12/2018 Summary The Global Project is the improvement of the Mediterranean Scandinavian corridor in Finland. The Global Project in Helsinki is located in the node of two core network corridors: the Mediterranean Scandinavian corridor and the North Sea Baltic corridor, serving as a connection between Helsinki Airport and the centre of Helsinki and making the flow of passenger transport smoother to Helsinki s harbours. Traffic in Helsinki has increased 40 % in last 10 years and the growth continues. The infrastructure and structures of the Pasila district are strongly developing in the coming years as the city of Helsinki constructs a new city centre block and terminal (Tripla-project). Helsinki is the departure or arrival stations of the most long-distance trains (70 %) in Finland. The traffic distractions at the Helsinki reflect on the train traffic of whole Finland. All the local and long distance trains in the Helsinki region stop at the two stations in Helsinki (Helsinki main station and Pasila). The rail capacity is nearing its maximum, thus weakening the punctuality and reliability of the traffic. The traffic is very vulnerable to distractions and delays. Because the Helsinki is the railhead of the Finnish railway network, all trains must change directions at the cramped railway yard of Helsinki. This makes congestion even worse. It is not possible to increase the capacity of the train traffic using the current tracks and track layout. The proposed Action consists of the Construction Plans of the Helsinki Rail Loop, the Helsinki railway yard and the additional western track of Pasila (2nd phase). The objective of the Action is a completion of studies. The objective of the studies is to provide maturity for construction and for proceeding to the actual implementation phase. The Helsinki Rail Loop is a new underground double-track rail line beneath Helsinki city centre (8 km, 3 stations). It increases capacity by allowing commuter trains to use the new loop link without using the congested overground Helsinki main station as their end station. It is estimated that after implementing the Helsinki Rail Loop, 70 % of the traffic decreases in the railway yard of Helsinki. This relief capacity for the long distance trains and makes the train traffic management more efficient. The functionality and the capacity of Helsinki railway yard will be improved by increasing the number of the signals, switches and by modernizing technical systems. After implementing the project it is possible to increase the number of trains and trains can be operated in a tighter schedule. The disturbances decreases as the number of the alternative routes used increases. The project makes the train operations more effective. To improve to capacity an additional track (1,5 km) and platform will be built at Pasila and track arrangements will be improved. Building a new terminal (Tripla-project) upon the railway bridge requires improvement and enlargement of the current railway bridge of Pasila. The Action is very important to Finland. The improvement of this nodal point is essential as it affects reliability of the whole Finnish long-distance train traffic operations, as the timetables and transfer connections of the almost all longdistance traffic operations also elsewhere in Finland depend on the trains starting from Helsinki region. The Action produces European added value as serves as a connection to Helsinki airport, which is the major international and domestic airport in Finland and it s one of the main hubs in the European connections to China and Japan. The Action also makes the flow of passenger transport smoother to Helsinki s harbours (North Sea Baltic Corridor). Study aims at removal of bottlenecks and bridging missing link which hinder the traffic flows. The project is ongoing and the financing of the Action is secured (cost estimate 32,61 M ). Financial aid is requested for the period 19.12.2014-31.12.2018. Page 2 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

A2.1 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M (26195427) Applicant nr. 1 APPLICANT Applicant's legal name Republic of Finland, the Ministry of Transport and Communications Administrative Data Legal address Street name Eteläesplanadi Number 16-18 Town / city Helsinki Postal code 00023 Government Country Republic of Finland Legal Status Of The Applicant Member State Page 3 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

A2.2 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M (26195427) Applicant nr. 1 Contact Points Person in charge (the person who will be contacted by the EU in the first instance) Family name Tevajärvi First name(s) Arto Function Project Coordinator Is the address different from the legal address (of section A2.1)? YES Street name Opastinsilta Number 12A Town / city Helsinki Postal code 00520 Country Republic of Finland Phone +358 29 534 3917 Fax +358 20 637 3700 Email arto.tevajarvi@fta.fi Representative authorized to sign this application Family name Hilska First name(s) Lassi Function Senior Adviser Is the address different from the legal address (of section A2.1)? NO Street name Eteläesplanadi Number 16-18 Town / city Helsinki Postal code 00023 Government Country Republic of Finland Phone +358 295 34 2497 Fax +358 9 160 28595 Email lassi.hilska@mintc.fi Date Stamp + signature Page 4 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

A2.3 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M (26195427) Applicant nr. 1 IF THE APPLICANT IS A MEMBER STATE OR AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION, FILL IN THE BELOW SECTION ON THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UNDERTAKING OR BODY(IES) WHICH WILL IMPLEMENT THE ACTION Implementing body's legal name Finnish Transport Agency Administrative data Legal address Street name Opastinsilta Number 12A Town / city Helsinki Postal code 00520 Country Republic of Finland (*) If there is more than one implementing body, indicate them all. Page 5 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

A2.4 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M (26195427) Applicant nr. 1 Page 6 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

A3.1 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M Member State(s) Region(s)(1) Third country Finland Helsinki-Uusimaa (1) NUTS 2 nomenclature will be used for the regions. LOCATION(S) OF THE ACTION ACTIVITIES OF THE ACTION Activity number Activity name Activity description Start date End date Verifying milestone 1 The Construction Plan of the The Activity includes the project 01/01/2015 30/06/2017 1, 10, 11 Rail Loop: The Project management management of the construction planning (services of the developer consultant, communications consultant, risk management and Independent Safety Assessor consultants and other expert tasks, Building Information Model and the costs of the project office etc). 2 The Construction Plan of the Rail Loop: Töölö The Activity includes construction planning of the underground railway station of Töölö, 2 km of track line in two parallel tunnels in Töölö section and emergency / maintenance / working tunnel of 2-3 km. 01/01/2015 30/06/2017 1, 2, 3 3 The Construction Plan of the Rail Loop: The City Centre 4 The Construction Plan of the Rail Loop: Hakaniemi The Activity also includes planning of the Vauhtitie (Area 1 Vauhti street ) area at end of the tunnel section (for example 150 m bridge and other traffic arrangements). The Activity includes construction 01/01/2015 30/06/2017 1, 4, 5 planning of the underground railway station of City Centre and 2 km of track line in two parallel tunnels in City Centre section and emergency / maintenance tunnel. The Activity includes construction 01/01/2015 30/06/2017 1, 6, 7 planning of the underground railway station of Hakaniemi, 2 km of track line in two parallel tunnels in Hakaniemi section and emergency tunnel and maintenance / working tunnel. The Activity also includes planning of the Nordensköldintie (Area 2 Nordensköld Street ) area at end of the tunnel section (50 m bridge and traffic arrangements). Page 7 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

5 The Construction Plan of the Rail Loop: Technical track and special field planning 6 The Construction Plan of the Rail Loop: The geological investigations 7 The Construction planning of the Helsinki railway yard The activity includes technical track planning and special field planning (safety devices, electrified track, HPAC, duct transfer etc). The geological investigations include for example rock and soil samples and geographical measurements. The activity also includes traffic arrangements needed during the investigations and the monitoring of ground water levels. The functionality and the capacity of the railway yard will be improved by increasing the number of the railway signals, switches and switch lanes, by modernizing the safety devices and by making the train operations more effective. The construction project will be divided in four phases which will be also planned in phases. The Activity includes three of these plans (ABI, CDEF and GH). The 1st phase (J) has already been planned. 01/01/2015 30/06/2017 1, 8, 9 01/01/2015 31/12/2016 1, 10 01/08/2015 31/12/2018 12, 13, 14, 15 8 The Construction Plan of the additional track of Pasila 2nd phase The Activity includes construction plans, supplementary studies (for example geological investigations and measurements of the track) and project management of the Helsinki railway yard planning phase. The Activity includes the Construction Plan of the 2nd phase works. The 2nd phase includes planning of the new additional track of 1,5 km and new platform. The activity also includes planning of the widening of the railway bridge of Sörnäinen (length of 80 m, width at maximum 3,2 m), lengthening of the northern underpass bridge (10 metres) and new pedestrian underpass bridge of Haarakallio (length of 75 m, width at maximum 7,2 m). The planning of the track, electrified track and safety devices of the 1st and 2nd phase is done during this Activity. The Activity also includes planning of the technical room and systems. MILESTONES OF THE ACTION 19/12/2014 31/12/2016 16, 17, 18 Milestone Milestone name (including milestones at start and Expected Means of verification number end date of the Action) date 1 The meeting of the steering group 12/02/2015 minutes of the meeting signed by FTA 2 The Construction Plan of Töölö delivered to FTA 31/10/2016 plan delivered to FTA 3 The Construction Plan of Töölö completed 30/06/2017 acceptance and final financial review signed by FTA 4 The Construction Plan of City Centre delivered to 31/10/2016 plan delivered to FTA FTA 5 The Construction Plan of City Centre completed 30/06/2017 acceptance and final financial review signed by FTA 6 The Construction Plan of Hakaniemi delivered to FTA 31/10/2016 plan delivered to FTA 7 The Construction Plan of Hakaniemi completed 30/06/2017 acceptance and final financial review signed by FTA Page 8 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

8 The Construction Plans of technical track and special 31/10/2016 plan delivered to FTA field planning delivered to FTA 9 The Construction Plan of technical track and special field planning completed 30/06/2017 acceptance and final financial /technical review signed by FTA 10 The geological investigations completed 31/12/2016 Inspection report signed by the FTA 11 All the Construction Plans completed 30/06/2017 acceptance and final financial review of activities 25 signed by FTA 12 The contract of 2nd phase (ABI) 15/08/2015 signed contract 13 The Construction Plan of 2nd phase (ABI) completed 30/09/2016 acceptance and final financial review signed by FTA 14 The Construction Plan of 3rd phase (CDEF) completed 31/08/2017 acceptance and final financial review signed by FTA 15 The Construction Plan of 4th phase (GH) completed 31/12/2018 acceptance and final financial review signed by FTA 16 The contract of the main planning of the technical 19/12/2014 signed contract room and systems signed 17 The contract for the construction plan of the 2nd 01/06/2015 signed contract phase signed 18 The construction plan of the 2nd phase completed 31/12/2016 inspection report signed by the FTA If the Action is part of a Global Project previously supported under CEF (after 2014) or TEN-T (before 2014) budget, please specify: Contribution Of The Action To The TEN-T Policy Objectives Decision number 2011-FI-93125-S 2013-FI-12010-S Title Improving punctuality and reliability of passenger train traffic Planning of the railway section Helsinki Riihimäki Page 9 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

A3.2 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M For multi-beneficiary projects, please give only the total amounts per category. For the definition of Global Project, please see the Guide fo Applicants. It is not required to enter information beyond the Global Project, for example regarding an entire Core Network Corridor, in this table (*) contribution to eligible costs only For multi-beneficiary actions, please split state, regional budgets and applicant's self-financing by applicant. All amounts must be in euros. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Global Project Sources of financing * Financial Contribution (in euros) 1. State budget(s) 2,911,795,000 2. Regional/local budget(s) 0 3. Applicant 0 4. EIB loan 0 5. Other loans 0 6. CEF financing 16,305,000 7. Other EU funds (ERDF, 0 CEF, FPR) 8. Public/private 0 partnerships 9. Other sources 0 Total 2,928,100,000 Sources of financing 1. State budget(s) (*) Total financial contributio n Proposed Action 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Republic of Finland, the 16,305,000 0 7,300,000 7,055,000 1,450,000 500,000 0 0 2. Regional/local budget(s) Republic of Finland, the 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3. Applicant Republic of Finland, the 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. EIB loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5. Other loans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6. CEF financing 16,305,000 0 7,300,000 7,055,000 1,450,000 500,000 0 0 7. Other sources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 32,610,000 0 14,600,000 14,110,000 2,900,000 1,000,000 0 0 If applicable, please indicate the exchange rate used for preparing the applications: Page 10 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

Application Form Part A A3.3 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M INDICATIVE BREAKDOWN OF ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE COSTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION BY ACTIVITY Activities 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total eligible costs Co-financing Rate CEF transport financing 1. DIRECT COSTS Activity 1 0 1,800,000 1,060,000 150,000 0 0 0 3,010,000 50.0 1,505,000 Activity 2 0 1,600,000 1,390,000 150,000 0 0 0 3,140,000 50.0 1,570,000 Activity 3 0 2,210,000 2,180,000 200,000 0 0 0 4,590,000 50.0 2,295,000 Activity 4 0 1,410,000 1,250,000 150,000 0 0 0 2,810,000 50.0 1,405,000 Activity 5 0 3,380,000 4,170,000 250,000 0 0 0 7,800,000 50.0 3,900,000 Activity 6 0 1,600,000 1,360,000 0 0 0 0 2,960,000 50.0 1,480,000 Activity 7 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 6,000,000 50.0 3,000,000 Activity 8 0 1,600,000 700,000 0 0 0 0 2,300,000 50.0 1,150,000 TOTAL (*) 0 14,600,000 14,110,000 2,900,000 1,000,000 0 0 32,610,000 16,305,000 Please give an indicative breakdown of the estimated eligible costs of the proposed Action (i.e. the action for which a financial contribution from the CEF-Transport is requested in this proposal) by activity (as defined in section A3.1) and year (all amounts must be in euros). (*) Costs which are not identifiable as direct costs, but which have nevertheless been incurred in connection with the action(as defined in section A3.1) and year (all amounts must be in euros). Page 11 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)

A4 Proposal TENtec nr. 2014-FI-TM-0142-M Please specify, for each Part of the Application Form, the language in which it is being submitted. If the language is not English, indicate whether you will provide an English translation before the deadline specified in the respective call text. Will an English translation of the proposal be provided? Annexes do not need to be translated unless the applicant deems this necessary. Application Form Part A In what language have you completed the project summary in Application Form Part A? If the project summary in Application Form Part A is not in English, will you submit an English translation before the deadline specified in the respective call text? English N/A Application Form Part B In what language have you completed Application Form Part B? If Form Part B is not in English, will you submit an English translation before the deadline specified in the respective call text? English N/A Application Form Part C In what language have you completed Application Form Part C? If Form Part C is not in English, will you submit an English translation before the deadline specified in the respective call text? English N/A Application Form Part D In what language have you completed Application Form Part D? If Form Part D is not in English, will you submit an English translation before the deadline specified in the respective call text? English N/A Translation cost If you will submit any English translations, please give an estimate of the total cost of the translation. 0 Page 12 (24/02/2015 00:00:00)