CONSTRUCTION HANDOFF FOR MACHINE CONTROL GRADING. A Case Study of ODOT's I-5: Willamette River Bridge Project Eugene/Springfield, Oregon



Similar documents
TechnicalNotes. Terramodel Software for Construction

Chapter 3D ROADWAY DESIGN

Introduction. Purpose of this Module. Objectives of this Module

LAB 31 - Create End Conditions to Search a Surface

Chapter 22. Lump Sum Project Guidelines

Appendix. Change Management Plan. Communication Plan. QA/QC Plan. Transition and Closure Plan C-1

Developing Critical Path Method Scheduling (CPM)

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS

Porous Pavement Alternatives Cost Analysis

Paving Capitalization Work Categories and Treatments

SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS CROSS SLOPE VERIFICATION:

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

NCDOT MAPPING GUIDELINES FOR PLANNING AND DESIGN ACTIVITIES MAPPING PRODUCTS FOR ROADWAY DESIGN AND PDEA STEPS FOR REQUESTING MAPPING PRODUCTS

Appendix D - Workflows / Tips and Tricks

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS

Exhibit A Scope of Work

Structures Construction Pre-Work Checklist PRE-WORK SHEET FOR PROJECT MANAGERS

QUALITY ASSURANCE. and QUALITY CONTROL PROCESS GUIDE. for PROJECT MANAGERS

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. 1. Trench excavation, backfill, and compaction; Section

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PLANS QUALITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

Infrastructure assets are distinguished from other capital assets because they normally:

Advancements in GPR for a Sustainable Tomorrow

Earth Retaining Structures

Appendix A Alternative Contracting General Engineering Consultant RFP. Appendix A

The Department intends to select one team. The contract will be for two years with a one year extension at the discretion of the Department.

700 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

Trenching and Excavation Safety

I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation

Texas Department of Transportation San Antonio District File Management System

Elev. A = , Elev. B = , horizontal distance = 1625 feet a. 7.7 b..077 c d. 1.28

ODOT Major Construction, Bikeways and Enhancements Report for Lucas County. (State Fiscal Years 2007 to 2010)

PENNDOT 3D MODELING FOR STRUCTURES WORKSHOP. Presented by: Steven Pletcher and Chris Daniels, P.E. October 21, 2014

ASPHALT PAVEMENT RECYCLING

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

LOAD TESTING OF SOME NEW BRIDGES IN LATVIA

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SECTION 4Aggegate Subbase

Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project

SECTION REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. 1. Trench excavation, backfill, and compaction; Section

1.3.2 Method of construction and restoration of existing water service connections. This shall include:

Construction Management Program

TRAFFIC ACCIDENT STUDY GUIDE 2010

EI ENGINEERING INSTRUCTION

Alternatives Presentation Meeting Middlebury WCRS(23)

Bruce Highway (Cooroy to Curra) Section A (Cooroy southern interchange to Sankeys Road)

SIGHT DISTANCE. Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E. Traffex Engineers Inc. WHY IS SIGHT DISTANCE SO IMPORTANT?

How To Improve Safety

Road Asset Management

CID STREET INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT

C9 - BIM implementation on Stockholm Bypass Project Using PowerCivil. Trafikplats Akalla och Häggvik, ÅF-URS.

S-1 (1803) PROGRESS SCHEDULES-CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM) The provisions of MnDOT 1803 are deleted and replaced with these Special Provisions.

Construction Survey Procedures

Ministry of Transportation. Construction Supervision Survey Guide

ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDDERS

LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2

State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS

Civil. 2. City of Seattle Supplement to the Specification for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, most current addition.

Minimizes sediment and debris from entering storm drains that lead to waterways and watercourses.

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

Successful performance management serves as

Unit Price Averages Reports

3. Amend the following: Item 410 Traffic Compacted Surface, Type C to Item 446 Cold Patch.

WILDCAT CANYON ROAD SPECIFICATION NO SLIDE REPAIR BIDDER'S PROPOSAL (continued)

ODOT Inspection Certification Program

Section 2100-Trenching and Tunneling

Planning Level Cost Estimation Tool. User s Manual

GHG Accounting in a Construction Project: The Case of Montréal's Turcot Project. Sylvie Tanguay Research Officer, Ministère des Transports du Québec

Disputes and Claims. 3 Processes Dispute Resolution and Administrative Claims Process

OHIO ASPHALT PAVING CONFERENCE

Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005

Introduction to Minimal Excavation Foundations

Before applying for a Road Opening Licence, please read and understand the following information.

CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM) SCHEDULES

NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. CALL ORDER 700 FEDERAL PROJECT NO. STPD-6-2(122) LOCATION: US-34/US-6,CULBERTSON-McCOOK COUNTIES: HITCHCOCK RED WILLOW

Guidelines for Fiber Optic Cable Permits

Review of Schedule Specification Requirements District SAP/WBS breakdown Asset template Cost & Resource Loading Stored Material Costs

Project Management On-line Guide

Disaster Recovery Managing and Leveraging Multiple Funding Sources

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM GUIDANCE FOR RESERVING CONTRACTS

PROJECT MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK, PART 2 - PHASE SPECIFIC PROJECT MANAGEMENT ISSUES

CHAPTER 20 Project Development Cost Estimates Table of Contents

Computer-assisted coding and documentation for a changing healthcare landscape

How To Improve Road Quality

Transcription:

CONSTRUCTION HANDOFF FOR MACHINE CONTROL GRADING A Case Study of ODOT's I-5: Willamette River Bridge Project Eugene/Springfield, Oregon

PRESENTATION BY: Tom Metcalf, PE OBEC Consulting Engineers in Lake Oswego, Oregon 14 years of roadway engineering experience Lead Roadway Engineer on the I-5: Willamette River Bridge Project Phone: 503-620-6103 Email: Tmetcalf@obec.com

General Questions of the Audience - Agency staff? - Consultants? - Anyone attend the Aug 2010 Machine Automation Conf in Eugene? - Anyone attend the ODOT Region 1 Brownbag on Machine Control Grading? - Rdwy designers? - Rdwy designers that use InRoads XM? - Anyone ever involved with Machine Control Grading on a project? - Anyone involved in handing over Machine Control Design Data to Construction?

Presentation Outline 1. Case Study Background 2. What is Machine Control Grading 3. What is 3D Design 4. How Has Machine Control Grading Changed 3D Design 5. Case Study - Handoff of Machine Control Grading to Construction

CASE STUDY BACKGROUND ODOT I-5: Willamette River Bridge Project in Eugene, Or. $150M bridge replacement project Twin 1900- foot-long I-5 Bridges 2300 feet of I-5 Roadway and Ramp Reconstruction 2500 feet of I-5 Roadway Work

CASE STUDY BACKGROUND How did machine control grading get incorporated into the I-5: Willamette River Bridge project? Project is an alternative delivery project where the prime contractor(hamilton) participates in the design K&E Excavating requested machine control grading to be utilized because of cost savings

What is Machine Control Grading? Contractor utilizes 3D design data rather than field staking to construct project elements such as: - Rough grading of earthwork prism - Final grading of earthwork prism - Final grading of aggregate base

What is 3D Design? Creates a Model of the Proposed Design Surface using Computer Software - Takes 2D plans and converts it to 3D - Used for establishing a project footprint - Generates earthwork and other quantities - Produces cross sections for construction staking

What is 3D Design? ODOT utilizes a 3D design software program called InRoads to model proposed surfaces ODOT now utilizes a newer Past version of InRoads version were not of InRoads as called XM powerful much more powerful and capable of better handling 3D design

How Machine Control Grading Changes 3D Design Old industry standard Minimized design effort (save design time and design expenditures) by providing just enough design data for field staff to "fill in the gaps" New industry standard due to machine control grading Increased design effort to eliminate all gaps in 3D design to minimize "field modifications" during construction

How Machine Control Grading Changes 3D Design Used to do "close enough" 3D modeling Why? Remember Past industry practice was to minimize design effort (save design time and design $$$) by providing just enough design data for field staff to "fill in the gaps" Examples?

How Machine Control Grading Changes 3D Design BEWARE: TECHNICAL CONTENT AHEAD!!!!!!

How Machine Control Grading Changes 3D Design Old = Large gaps between template drops New = Smaller gaps

How Machine Control Grading Changes REQUIRES CLOSE COLLABORATION 3D Design WITH BRIDGE, WALL AND ROADWAY DESIGNERS Modeling around bridges, abutments and wingwalls

How Machine Control Grading Changes 3D Design Guardrail benches, sideslope transitions and structure section transitions

How Machine Control Grading Changes 3D Design Some modeling was accidentally overlooked, such as drainage features

Effects of Past 3D Design on Construction Projects Need experienced field staff to interpret design for "field fitting" gaps in the design Quantity overages since modeling is not accurately reflecting final field conditions Change orders for "filling in" the gaps in the design REDUCED MORE RISK TO MORE LESS EXPENSIVE = CONTRACTORS PROJECTS FOR ODOT

Results of New 3D Modeling Practices on Construction Projects Greatly reduces field interpretation of design More accurate quantities at bidding REDUCED RISK TO CONTRACTORS = LESS EXPENSIVE PROJECTS FOR ODOT This is a proven concept. For a number of years, contractors have been requiring and paying for this level of modeling effort from designers on designbuild projects. Design $$$ < Construction $$$

Impacts of New 3D Design on Engineering Efforts Must decide at the beginning of a project to do more detailed modeling Difficult and time-consuming to retrofit a completed project not tailored for machine control grading Introduces need for QA review of modeling Need to account for more design time and design dollars due to added QA effort

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information How does the 3D design get to the construction equipment?

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Handling/Converting of 3D Design Models Contractors don't use InRoads.they all have different proprietary software Have to convert design models to Proprietary software models for machines to "read" Designer must QC proprietary software models before work begins Increases design time and design expenditures

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Earthwork Comparison between DTMs and Contractor Files

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information DTM File Naming Convention

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information DTM File Index

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information DTM Index in Plan View

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Microstation File of All Alignments and Edges of Pavement

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Annotated Cross Sections on 5 Intervals

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Annotated Cross Sections for All Non- Roadway Modeling

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Multiple Design Packages Required Models Broken Up By Design Package

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Design Changes After Final PS&E Require Remodeling During Construction Can be very time consuming Requires full QC Have to remodel quickly. Contractor could claim delay. Need to account for remodeling effort in Construction Engineering budget

Construction Handoff of Machine Control Grading Information Per the Contractor s request, Machine Control Grading was utilized for other design disciplines, such as traffic control plans Converted 2D traffic control plans to 3D staging design Generated models by traffic control stage Generated quantities by traffic control stage Provided x-sections of each traffic control stage

CONCLUSION ODOT's current design software is InRoads XM, and it is more than capable of generating the 3D designs required for machine control grading. This is not a futuristic concept. It has been utilized on a number of past and current projects. Embrace change = Better product = Reduced construction cost to ODOT With Machine Control Grading, Construction handoff is more involved and designer must be engaged throughout construction to remodel as necessary

QUESTIONS Tom Metcalf, PE OBEC Consulting Engineers 503-620-6103 Tmetcalf@obec.com