JAN 2000 SINGLE DEFLECTION T RACK SELECTION

Similar documents
Blast Proof Occupied Buildings

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

Blast Resistant Building BP Refinery Rotterdam

CPA Steel Stud Framing Page 1 of 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Roof Decks 172 B, BA, BV Deck N, NA Deck. Form Decks FD,.6 FDV Deck 1.0 FD, 1.0 FDV Deck 1.5 FD Deck 2.0 FD Deck 3.

Formwork for Concrete

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

General Approach. Structure Components. Is all lumber the same? Lumber Grades. Rafters Girders / Beams Columns. Sketch general structural layout

Discipline: Structural Issued

Connection Solutions

STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR BONDING OR MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF INSULATION PANELS AND MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF ANCHOR AND/OR BASE SHEETS TO SUBSTRATES

Chapter 6 ROOF-CEILING SYSTEMS

GUARDRAIL POST STEEL

PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES

Nucor VR16 II TM Vertical Rib Standing Seam Roof System

Section 5A: Guide to Designing with AAC

Concrete Design Manual

SMALL SCALE ASTM E 119/UL 263 ONE HOUR FIRE TESTING FOR MARINOWARE ON JOIST-RITE WITH ARMOROC FLOOR VTEC # TESTED: MAY 23, 2008 REVISION

Figure Test set-up

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

Structural Foundation System

DSM 1 (800)

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

STRUCTURAL CONCEPT FOR LIGHT GAUGE STEEL FRAME SYSTEM

DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS

Breakaway Walls

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

Green Thread Product Data

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

Section A Roof Truss

Design Parameters for Steel Special Moment Frame Connections

Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

FOAMULAR LT40, 400 and 600 insulations with minimum compressive strengths of

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

How To Design A Post Tensioned Deck For A Building

International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL

1. Concrete: T W L / 27 = Concrete C.Y. Multiply Feet Thickness x Feet Width x Feet Length / 27 = Cubic Yards.

North American Stainless

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

Featuring TJ Rim Board and TimberStrand LSL

AISI CHEMICAL COMPOSITION LIMITS: Nonresulphurized Carbon Steels

EDD-401. Stationary Louver Dual Drainable Blade. Application and Design. Standard Construction

BEAMCHEK EXAMPLES. RIDGE BEAM SIMPLE SPAN EXAMPLE No. 1 ACTUAL MATERIALS, LOADS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS MAY VARY. THIS IS AN ILLUSTRATION ONLY.

TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY Issued: August 1, LARKIN CENTER 1605 JOSEPH DRIVE MIDLAND MICHIGAN (989)

COLORADO MODEL. 35 x 65 SPECIFICATIONS

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

SECTION MediaStation Model 125 Electric Lateral Files (ELF)

[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]

Load Design Charts. R-CONTROL SIPs STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS. CONTROL, NOT COMPROMISE.

Design of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls

research report Residential Hip Roof Framing Using Cold-Formed Steel Members RESEARCH REPORT RP06-2 American Iron and Steel Institute

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

North American Stainless

SFI SPECIFICATION 28.1 EFFECTIVE: SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 *

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

REPORT HOLDER: JENWEST ENTERPRISES LLC, DBA ADVANCED CONNECTOR SYSTEMS 321 SOUTH 1240 WEST #15 LINDON, UTAH EVALUATION SUBJECT:

Hilti, Inc South 122 nd East Avenue Tulsa, OK

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

FRAME PROFILE MASONRY METAL DOOR FRAME FLUSH MASONRY KD MITER CORNER JOINT. #8 Screw (MS002485) Required on all fire rated KD frames. Bend Tabs.

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Report No.: B Rendered to: CAPTIVEAIRE, INC. Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

OVERALL CONVEYOR WIDTH STEEL ALUMINUM MODEL # PER FT. 10 FT. 5 FT. PER FT. 10 FT. 5 FT. PER FT. 10 FT. 5 FT. PER FT. 10 FT. 5 FT.

5 G R A TINGS ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL. MBG Metal Bar Grating METAL BAR GRATING MANUAL MBG METAL BAR GRATING NAAMM

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

UL Online Certifications Directory

SERVICE LINE EXTENSION AND SERVICE LINE CONNECTION CONDENSED SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS

PC-Concrete Injectable Concrete Anchoring and Repair System

B.TECH. (AEROSPACE ENGINEERING) PROGRAMME (BTAE) Term-End Examination December, 2011 BAS-010 : MACHINE DESIGN

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS REPORT HOLDER: FIRESTONE BUILDING PRODUCTS COMPANY, LLC

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building

Load-Span Tables for PS-1 Plywood

Local buckling of plates made of high strength steel

Sheet metal operations - Bending and related processes

HURRICANE MITIGATION RETROFITS FOR EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES

Technical Assignment 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Joist. Reinforcement. Draft 12/7/02

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

GYPSUM AREA SEPARATION FIREWALLS GA

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

Valu Guide Sheaths. Valu Guide Inserts. Optional Valu Guide Inserts. Typical Properties of Valu Guide Rail. and Hardware.

Vestibule Case Study. Vestibule Requirement Intent [2003 IECC, 2006 IECC, 2003 IBC, 2006 IBC, , ]

The better way to build TM. Installation Manual. EXTERIOR WALL SIPs

VERTICAL MICROPILE LATERAL LOADING. Andy Baxter, P.G.

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

SECTION STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

PERFORMANCE RATED I-JOISTS

STRESS AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF LINEAR ELASTIC BARS IN TENSION

North American Stainless

Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures

UL 580 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. SERIES/MODEL: MW Vector PRODUCT TYPE: Ceiling System, 3' OC

Fastener Loads for Plywood Screws Number E830D August 2005

Reinforced Concrete Design

ASTM A860/A860M-09 Standard Specification for Wrought High Strength. Ferritic Steel Butt Welding Fittings. 1. Scope :- 2. Reference Documents :-

Transcription:

$3.00 JAN 2000 SINGLE DEFLECTION T RACK SELECTION INTRODUCTION Since the popular use of steel studs for framing full height walls, there has been a recognition that the top of the wall needs to allow for deflection of the floor or roof assembly above when subjected to an applied live load. The allowance for deflection is essential for interior non-load bearing applications. It has been common practice to utilize either a single track with the wall studs nested into the track (see Figure 1) with no attachment of the wall sheathing or stud to the deflection track. An alternate assembly uses a track nested into another track with no attachment of the nested inside track to the outside track. The track within a track allows the stud at the top of the wall to be attached to the inside track to provide a more uniform load transfer to the outside deflection track flange, and to stabilize the studs against rotation. OBSERVATIONS Over the years the question of how to determine the effective width of that portion of the track flange to be used for calculating the required design thickness of the leg for the single track deflection assembly was largely unanswered and was up to the design professional to determine. The design professional could assume an effective width equal to the width of the stud flange bearing against the side of the deflection track (conservative) or a width equal to the on center spacing of the studs (un-conservative). The Army Corps of Engineers has adopted a procedure (ETL 1110-3-411) which rec ognizes the width of the stud flange plus a portion of the track flange on each side of the stud as being the effective width b eff (see Figure 1). It is recommended that the steel used for the deflection track have good ductility characteristics, (tensile strength to yield point ratio not less than 1.08 and total elongation not less than 10 percent in a two-inch gage length). Good ductility characteristics reduce the possibility of micro cracking during the roll-forming process and provide inelastic reserve. Satisfactory performance is based on the following: 1. The track thickness must be sufficient to resist plate bending along the effective track flange width, b eff. 2. Each stud flange must be stabilized to resist rotation of the stud. FIGURE 1 Page 1

DEFLECTION TRACK THICKNESS DETERMINATION Deflection track thickness determination based on the Army Corps of Engineers ETL 1110-3-411 procedure utilizes the effective width of the track leg in plate bending. The equation for determining the required thickness is: where: t = 7.5 P e Fy beff t = required design thickness, in inches P = the maximum reaction at the top of the stud, in lbs. multiplied by 0.75 for wind or earthquake loads per A5.1.3 of the AISI Specification if applicable (Check local building code for application of reduction factor) e =distance between the track web and the point of application of the reaction P, in inches (design gap times 1.5) F y = minimum steel yield stress, in psi b eff =effective width of the track in plate bending, given by: e +1.25 beff = wstud + 2 tan(30º) w stud =the stud flange width, in inches. Design curves can be developed utilizing a typical interior, non-load bearing stud flange width of 1.25, a yield stress of either 33 or 50 (50 is noted on the curves) and 16 and 24 on center stud spacing. A series of such curves are given in Figures 2 through 7. By knowing the non-load bearing wall height, the lateral design load (typically 5 psf for interior walls), the design gap (gap between the end of the stud and the track web), the stud spacing, and the steel minimum yield stress of the track, the required design thickness of the single deflection track can be determined. Thickness - Steel Components Minimum hickness (mils) T 1 18 27 33 43 54 68 97 Design Thickness (in) 0.0188 0.0283 0.0346 0.0451 0.0566 0.0713 0.1017 Reference Only Gauge No. 25 22 20 18 16 14 12 1 Minimum Thickness represents 95% of the design thickness and is the minimum acceptable thickness delivered to the job site based on Section A3.4 of the 1996 AISI Specification. As an example: Design load = 5 psf Stud spacing = 24 o.c. Design gap = 0.5 Min. yield stress = 33 Wall height = 15-0 From Figure 3 design thickness of t =.0451 (18ga.) NOTE: Maximum allowable wall height = 19.52ft. It is recommended that the depth of the deflection track flange be equal to the design gap plus 1 inch for one story buildings, and equal to 2 times the design gap plus 1 inch for all other applications to provide engagement of the stud into the deflection track. The longer track leg, for multiple story buildings, allows for the floor system supporting the stud wall to deflect while still maintaining engagement of the stud in the deflection track. NOTE: The minimum uncoated delivered thickness can be equal to 95 percent of the design thickness per the 1996 AISI Specification for The Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, Section A3.4. The technical data provided in this publication should not constitute any representation or warranty expressed or implied, on the part of SSMA or any individual that the information is suitable for any general or specific application. Any individual or entity making use of the information contained herein assumes all risk and liability arising or resulting from such use. Copyright 2000 by the Steel Stud Manufacturers Association Page 2

68 mil (14 GA.) t=0.0713" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" Fy=50 43 mil (18 GA.) t=0.0451" 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" 33 mil (20 GA.) t=0.0346" Page 3

68 mil (14 GA.) t=0.0713" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" Fy=50 54 mil 43 mil (16 GA.) (18 GA.) t=0.0566" 33 mil (20 GA.) t=0.0346" t=0.0451" Page 4

54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" Fy=50 68 mil (14 GA.) t=0.0713" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" 43 mil (18 GA.) 33 mil (20 GA.) t=0.0346" t=0.0451" Page 5

33 mil (20 GA.) t=0.0346" 43 mil (18 GA.) t=0.0451" 68 mil (14 GA.) t=0.0713" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" Page 6

68 mil (14 GA.) t=0.0713" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" Fy=50 33 mil (20 GA.) t=0.0346" 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" 43 mil (18 GA.) t=0.0451" Page 7

68 mil (14 GA.) t=0.0713" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) t=0.0566" Fy=50 54 mil (16 GA.) 33 mil (20 GA.) 43 mil (18 GA.) t=0.0451" t=0.0566" t=0.0346" Page 8