Advanced qualification methods for parabolic trough receivers. SCHOTT Solar CSP Riyadh, November 20 th 2013

Similar documents
Receiver für Salzschmelzen Der nächste Schritt in der Parabolrinnentechnologie

Herausforderungen in der Produktion von Receivern für Parabolrinnenkraftwerke

The Power of Concentrating Solar

Molten Salt for Parabolic Trough Applications: System Simulation and Scale Effects

RENEWABLE ENERGY INDIA 2008 EXPO Pragati Maidan, New Delhi

CSP Parabolic Trough Technology for Brazil A comprehensive documentation on the current state of the art of parabolic trough collector technology

Engineering and Construction for Sustainability Solar Concentration Workshop World Bank November 5th, 2008

DOE Concentrating Solar Power 2007 Funding Opportunity Project Prospectus

Solar Energy Technologies Program Peer Review

U.S. Department of Energy CSP Program Review

Harness Your Energy NOW AVAILABLE! the new. ASW-58A-22/30 Solar Thermal Collector

Molten Salt Solar Tower: The Possible Way Towards Competitiveness

ENEA Thermodynamic Solar Project. Prepared by Mauro Vignolini Presented by A. Fontanella Italy China Innovation Forum - November 8, 2010

Solar Energy Systems

EUROTROUGH - Parabolic Trough Collector Developed for Cost Efficient Solar Power Generation

Solar Tower Systems. Status and Perspective. CSP Industry Days Dr. Reiner Buck. DLR Institute of Solar Research

Solar thermal collectors for medium temperature applications: a comprehensive review and updated database

DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program Peer Review. Denver, Colorado April 17-19, 2007

SolCalor B.V. is officiel Benelux Service Center of SRB-Energy. Marktstraat 23, 5701 RM, Helmond, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-(0) Website:

Renewable Energy Research for Global Markets. REnKnow.Net Renewable Energies Knowledge Transfer Network

Measuring Optical and Thermal Properties of High Temperature Receivers

CSP-gas hybrid plants: Cost effective and fully dispatchable integration of CSP into the electricity mix

VGB Congress Power Plants 2001 Brussels October 10 to 12, Solar Power Photovoltaics or Solar Thermal Power Plants?

Solar Energy in Egypt Advantages and Obstacles

Fichtner s activities in Solar Engineering. Georg Brakmann Managing Director Fichtner Solar GmbH

Solar Thermal Power Plants From Vision to Realisation

Simulation of parabolic trough concentrating solar power plants in North Africa

TECHITALY2012. Public private partnership. The Italian leadership on concentrating solar power

ABENGOA SOLAR Solar Power for a Sustainable World

Solar Thermal Energy Storage Technologies

Algeria Potentials for CSP/PV and Applications

4 th EU Sout Africa Clean Coal Working Group Meeting

HYBRID SOLAR - BIOMASS PLANTS FOR POWER GENERATION; TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

Sensitivity analysis for concentrating solar power technologies

Dynamic modelling of a parabolic trough solar power plant

Solar Thermal Systems

Steam turbines for solar thermal power plants. Industrial steam turbines. Answers for energy.

SOLARPACES: Development of an integrated solar thermal power plant training simulator

Irradiance. Solar Fundamentals Solar power investment decision making

Task III: Solar Technology and Advanced Applications. Activity Overview. Peter Heller, DLR, OA Task III. EXCO Meeting , Marrakech, Morocco

Accelerated Aging and Life Time Prediction for Solar Concentrators

ABENGOA ABENGOA SOLAR

Approaching the Sun. Concentrated Solar Power Plants with LESER Safety Valves. The-Safety-Valve.com

VITOSOL r 200-T SP2A. VITOSOL 200-T Type SP2A

University of Évora BES CHAIR in Renewable Energies

Renewable Energy Partnership EU-MENA

Dow Corning PROPRIETARY. Dow Corning. A Thermal Modelling Comparison of Typical Curtain Wall Systems

Your Partner for Concentrated Solar Power Generation The Heart of Your Process

UniPlate. Solar Collectors SOLAR SYSTEMS.

How To Make Money From Energy Production

Solar Thermal Power Generation - A Spanish Success Story

SOLAR ENERGY OVERVIEW WHAT S S NEW WHAT S S NEXT WHAT S S NEEDED

WITH LOW EMISSIVITY GLASS

Lo Stoccaggio dell Energia negli Impianti Solari a Concentrazione

CSP Research Infrastructure in the U.S. Mark S. Mehos CSP Program Manager National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO

SOLAR PLATFORM OF THE ATACAMA DESERT

CSP. Feranova Reflect Technology. klimaneutral natureoffice.com DE gedruckt

Concentrating Solar Power: A Look at the Costs and Returns of CSP


Distributed Solar-Thermal-Electric Generation and Storage Seth R. Sanders, Artin Der Minassians, Mike He EECS Department, UC Berkeley

SOLAR WATER PURIFICATION WITH THE HELP OF CSP TECHNOLOGY

Residential Windows, 3 rd edition Corrected index 1

Solar Energy Utilization in the United States. For the American Nuclear Society Nor Cal Ali Moharrer, P.E. February 21, 2013

Solar Thermal Electricity. Eduardo Garcia Iglesias Deputy Secretary General of Protermosolar

Corporate Presentation 2011 ABENER. Engineering and Construction for Sustainability

R ENEWABLE SOURCES CSP. Sustainable and cost-efficient solar thermal energy

Concentrating Solar Power

Outline. Solar Energy II. Solar Power II March 10, ME 496ALT Alternative Energy 1. Alternative Energy

Concentrating Solar Power

Active Solar Thermal Energy Applications in Buildings (Part 1)

CONCENTRATED SOLAR PLANTS

Economic Mass Producible Mirror Panels for Solar Concentrators

Steam turbines for CSP plants. Industrial steam turbines. Answers for energy.

SENSITIVITY OF CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER TROUGH PERFORMANCE, COST, AND FINANCING WITH THE SOLAR ADVISOR MODEL

Solar One and Solar Two

Design Approach, Experience and Results of 1MW Solar Thermal Power Plant

EXPERIMENTAL AND CFD ANALYSIS OF A SOLAR BASED COOKING UNIT

Das Desertec Konzept und die Desertec Industrial Initiative

SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION

Test Report No. C926LPEN

October, 2011 Regional Center For Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency RCREEE

Dispelling the Solar Myth - Evacuated Tube versus Flat Plate Panels. W illiam Comerford Sales Manager Ireland Kingspan Renewables Ltd.

Transient Analysis of Integrated Shiraz Hybrid Solar Thermal Power Plant Iman Niknia 1, Mahmood Yaghoubi 1, 2

PROcesses, Materials and Solar Energy PROMES-CNRS Laboratory, France

U.S. Concentrating Solar Power

Why Steel? Performance Study of Steel Doors and Frames Compared to Other Materials. September Sponsored by SDI, HMMA, CSDMA

COVER FEATURE CATCHING THE SUN

Figure 1 Wafer with Notch

THORNE & DERRICK UK TEL FAX TEL FAX

Solar Millennium AG. European Climate Foundation 3 December 2009

SELECTIVE GLAZING FOR SUN CONTROL

ABENGOA. E&C: The backbone of Abengoa. Manuel Valverde. 8th Annual Analyst and Investor Day. E&C Executive VP

Concentrating solar power drivers and opportunities for cost-competitive electricity

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER NOW CLEAN ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

VIESMANN. Datasheet Part numbers and prices: see pricelist VITOSOL 200-F. Flat-plate collector for the utilisation of solar energy

Concentrating solar process heat for dairy plants in Switzerland: Update and return on experience after 3 years of operation

Test Report No. C908LPEN

THE IMPACT OF YIELD STRENGTH OF THE INTERCONNECTOR ON THE INTERNAL STRESS OF THE SOLAR CELL WITHIN A MODULE

Solare termico altre applicazioni. G.V. Fracastoro

Expert System for Solar Thermal Power Stations. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.v. Institute of Technical Thermodynamics

Transcription:

Advanced qualification methods for parabolic trough receivers SCHOTT Solar CSP Riyadh, November 20 th 2013

2 SCHOTT Solar CSP develops and supplies receivers for linear focusing CSP technologies

3 Since the market entry in 2005, SCHOTT Solar CSP has achieved a leading market position CSP capacity installed or under construction More than 3 Gigawatts capacity equipped with SCHOTT PTR 70 receivers ~ 3 GW 0,35 GW 2005 ~ 1 GW 2013 Supplied over 1.000.000 receivers to more than 50 CSP projects worldwide

4 All existing CSP plants in MENA are equipped with SCHOTT receivers Ain Beni Mathar 450 MW ISCCS plus 25 MW parabolic trough solar field Operating Hassi-R mel 130 MW ISCCS plus 25 MW parabolic trough solar field Operating Kuraymat 146 MW ISCCS with 30 MW parabolic trough solar field Operating Shams 100 MW stand-alone power plant at Shams Operating : end 2012

The key optical receiver parameters are aperture length, transmission of glass tube, absorptance of absorber tube and emittance of absorber tube 5 Solar 1 2 3 irradiation Shading losses Reflection losses glass Reflection losses absorber Stability of Glass-to-Metal Seal vacuum absorber 4m x 70mm absorber 4m x 70mm absorber Gas conduction heat losses Vacuum stability 4 Radiation heat losses Related receiver parameters 1 Aperture length in % 2 Transmission of glass tube (tau) in % 3 Absorptance of absorber tube (alpha) in % Emittance of absorber tube (epsilon) in % 4

6 The process technologies involved in SCHOTT s receiver production are leading edge Anti-reflective coating of the glass tube ensures high transmittance and high abrasion resistance Absorber coating achieves low emittance and high absorptance of the absorber tube SCHOTT PTR 3rd generation Vacuum insulation minimizes heat conduction losses Durable glass-to-metal seal material combination with matching coefficients of thermal expansion Optimized design of bellows achieves a maximum optical aperture length of the receivers

7 SCHOTT pursues a continuous improvement of its PTR receiver SCHOTT PTR 70 Receiver Development + 2.9% plant efficiency SCHOTT PTR 1 st Gen SCHOTT PTR 2 nd Gen + 1.0% plant efficiency SCHOTT PTR 3 rd Gen + noble gas capsule = life-time insurance SCHOTT PTR 3 rd Gen Premium high temperature (550 C) SCHOTT PTR 4 th Gen 2006 2008 2011 2012 2013

8 Based on a new receiver platform, SCHOTT issues three receiver products SCHOTT PTR 4 th generation receiver platform SCHOTT PTR 70 Advance New steel grade for 550 C + Novel absorber coating + Molten Salt SCHOTT PTR 70 Premium + Integrated Noble Gas Capsule as lifetime extender Oil SCHOTT PTR 70 New bellow design, suitable for high-temperature operation Glass-to-metal seal with matching coefficients of thermal expansions Protection cap for improved product robustness and easy handling Oil

9 The receiver component is the key lever between investment and return for any parabolic trough plant Less investment at same plant output 1% improved receiver efficiency significantly impacts investment required while maintaining equal plant output 0.8-1.2% less plant Capex $1.3-1.7m savings for a 50MW plant + 1% receiver efficiency Higher plant output at same investment 1% improved receiver efficiency significantly increases plant output while maintaining investment constant 0.9-1.4% improved efficiency, directly translating into plant output Effect of 1% improved receiver efficiency Investment standard receiver -$1.3-1.7m SCHOTT receiver +0.9-1.4% Plant output

At typical operation temperatures for oil-based HTF, a 1% points better absorptance or emittance translate to approximately 0.7 % lower LCOE 10 Sensitivity alpha/epsilon for operation temperatures 391 C and 550 C * Operation temperature 391 C: Similar impact of alpha and epsilon Operation temperature 550 C: Higher impact of epsilon * based on SAM simulation of 100 MW plant, storage 7,5h, location Almeria (Spain)

1.349.640 2.197.240 1.656.080 4.238.000 5.652.840 3.481.680 9.969.080 9.128.000 27.384.000 SCHOTT Solar CSP Using a receiver with 1% lower absorptance, 1% higher emittance and 0,3% lower active length leads to over 4 musd additional solar field cost for a large CSP plant in US 11 Additional solar field costs (US$) using competitor products vs. SCHOTT Gen 3 receiver 30.000.000 25.000.000 Optical parameter (%) SCHO TT Competitor product Gen 3 A B C 20.000.000 absorptance 95,5 94,5 94,5 94,5 emittance 9,5 10,5 11,5 15 15.000.000 10.000.000 transmittance glass tube active length @ > 300 C 96,5 96,5 96,5 96,5 96,7 96,4 96,1 95,4 5.000.000 * reference net electricity output 0 Daggett (USA) 250MW, no TES Almeria (Spain) 50MW, no TES Almeria (Spain) 50MW, 7.5 hours TES 519,5 GWh/a 84,3 GWh/a 137,0 GWh/a Plant assumptions Size of solar field is adapted to reach the net electricity output using SCHOTT Gen3 receivers * Specific solar field costs: 326 $/sqm competitor product A competitor product B competitor product C

-28,0-9,8-7,9-4,8-4,4-3,0-1,2-1,8-1,5 SCHOTT Solar CSP Using a receiver with 1% lower absorptance, 1% higher emittance and 0,3% lower active length results in 4,8 GWh less annual electricity output for a large CSP plant in US 12 Difference in net electricity output (GWh/a) using competitor products vs. SCHOTT Gen 3 receiver reference net electricity output 0,0 519,5 GWh/a 84,3 GWh/a 137,0 GWh/a Daggett (USA) 250MW, no TES Almeria (Spain) 50MW, no TES Almeria (Spain) 50MW, 7.5 hours TES Optical parameter (%) SCHO TT Competitor product Gen 3 A B C absorptance 95,5 94,5 94,5 94,5-5,0 emittance 9,5 10,5 11,5 15-10,0 transmittance glass tube active length @ > 300 C 96,5 96,5 96,5 96,5 96,7 96,4 96,1 95,4-15,0-20,0-25,0-30,0 competitor product A competitor product B competitor product C

Degradation of receiver performance over operation time affects the profitability of a CSP plant. Excellent optical and thermal properties must be validated for the full plant lifetime 13 a, e, t (initial) a, e, t (after x years of operation) GWh Net electricity output Efficiency gap time

14 DLR developed advanced validation methods for performance and aging of parabolic trough receivers DLR objective: Provide most advanced measurement and validation methods for performance of Parabolic trough receivers Approach: Development of measurement technology Publication Standardization Independent measurement services Results are relevant for: EPC companies Owners and plant operators Receiver manufacturers

15 The DLR approach covers tests for optical and thermal performance as well as aging and fatigue tests Performance Tests Accelerated ageing tests

16 Solar simulator receiver test bench approach Principle: calorimetric measurement of optical efficiency Conditions: solar simulator lamps elliptical mirror trough with flat end mirrors receiver at room temperature relative measurement (reference receiver)

17 The DLR optical performance testing method uses the most realistic approach

18 Test bench generations 1st generation (ElliRec) 2nd generation (OptiRec) also used at SCHOTT Solar CSP R&D

In addition to the laboratory test benches, receiver performance is validated in a real parabolic trough collector at the KONTAS test facility by DLR-CIEMAT 19

20 DLR measurements are the basis of thermal performance data provided in the receiver specifications Measurement results of specific heat loss of the 4 th generation SCHOTT PTR receiver (W/m) Example: 4 th generation of SCHOTT PTR Receiver Single sample measurement, no statistical data

The combination of accelerated aging tests and optical tests provide quantitative evaluation of receiver performance over lifetime 21 Changes of optical parameters during accelerated aging tests @ 650 C (absolute % points) Example: SCHOTT PTR Advance Receiver for usage with Molten Salts Single sample measurement, no statistical data

22 Test results are publically available and can be used as basis for supplier selection within EPC tenders Publication on DLR website Usage as basis for supplier selection within EPC tenders

23 Summary Based on unique technology innovations, SCHOTT Solar CSP achieved a leading market position for solar receivers For validation of new receiver products, DLR provides leading edge test methods and hardware to measure performance and lifetime The DLR methods represent a quasi-standard in the industry. They are used within SCHOTT s receiver product development and qualification The standardized test reports by DLR are publically available and can be used as basis for supplier selection within EPC tenders