Seismic Loads Based on IBC 2012/ASCE 7-10

Similar documents
Design Example 1 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters 11.4

The ASCE 7 standard Minimum Design Loads for

EARTHQUAKE INDUCED AMPLIFIED LOADS IN STEEL INVERTED V- TYPE CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

SEISMIC APPROACH DESIGN COMPARISON BETWEEN

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

November 20, Heather Sustersic Dear Professor Sustersic,

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES PART V SEISMIC DESIGN

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

Earthquakes and Data Centers

SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

Contractor s Statement of Responsibility for Seismic-Force-Resisting Systems This form is to be filled out by the contractor.

Untopped Precast Concrete Diaphragms in High-Seismic Applications. Ned M. Cleland, Ph.D., P.E. President Blue Ridge Design, Inc. Winchester, Virginia

Protecting data centers from seismic activity Understanding enclosure standards is critical to protecting equipment

EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF BUILDING RESTING ON SLOPING GROUND

DESIGN DRIFT REQUIREMENTS FOR LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Design for Nonstructural Components

Seismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF TUNED/HYBRID MASS DAMPERS USING MULTI-STAGE RUBBER BEARINGS FOR VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURES

Miss S. S. Nibhorkar 1 1 M. E (Structure) Scholar,

Computer Program for the Analysis of Loads On Buildings. Using the ASCE 7-93 Standard. Stephen E. Browning. Master of Engineering.

Development of Seismic-induced Fire Risk Assessment Method for a Building

Expected Performance Rating System

Comparison of the Structural Provisions in the International Existing Building Code 2012 versus the Rhode Island State Rehabilitation Code

Loads and Load Combinations for NBCC. Outline

Discipline: Structural Issued

Review of Code Provisions on Design Seismic Forces for Liquid Storage Tanks

SEISMIC TESTING OF NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESCRIBED RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Chapter 6 ROOF-CEILING SYSTEMS

Seismic Risk Evaluation of a Building Stock and Retrofit Prioritization

Seismic performance evaluation of an existing school building in Turkey

SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND RETROFITTING OF R.C.C STRUCTURE

STRESS AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF LINEAR ELASTIC BARS IN TENSION

Rehabilitation of a 1985 Steel Moment- Frame Building

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

10.1. Solving Quadratic Equations. Investigation: Rocket Science CONDENSED

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

G. Michele Calvi IUSS Pavia

Seismic Retrofit of Bridges - A Short Course

Ch. 58 DIVISION D-O 34 CHAPTER 58. DIVISION D-O ORDINARY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OFFICE OCCUPANCY GROUP CONSTRUCTION TYPE MAXIMUM STORY HEIGHT

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Reinforced Concrete Design

STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHAPTER 16

Critical Facility Round Table

STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHAPTER 16

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Pipe Supports and AST Anchorage

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

Bridge Seismic Design, Retrofitting and Loss Assessment

Cover. When to Specify Intermediate Precast Concrete Shear Walls Rev 4. White Paper WP004

Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites

NATURAL PHENOMENA HAZARDS DESIGN AND EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES

MANUFACTURED HOUSING USED AS DWELLINGS

Structural Retrofitting For Earthquake Resistance

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Control of Seismic Drift Demand for Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Weak First Stories

PROHITECH WP3 (Leader A. IBEN BRAHIM) A short Note on the Seismic Hazard in Israel

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RC TALL BUILDING SUBJECTED TO WIND AND EARTHQUAKE LOADS

HCD DSA OSHPD 1 2 1/AC AC SS SS/CC CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 57

Tall buildings. Florea Dinu. Lecture 13: 25/02/2014

Analysis of seismic response control for long-span cable-stayed. bridge under traveling wave input *

STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHAPTER 16

Retrofitting in the Central US: A Federal Perspective

Aluminium systems profile selection

PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC EVALUATION AND RETROFITTING OF UNSYMMETRICAL MEDIUM RISE BUILDINGS- A CASE STUDY

A 38-story design-build steel structure features a staggered-truss frame

DESIGN CRITERIA. Determination of earthquake demand. Building importance level. Component categories SEISMICALLY RESILIENT NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

Seismic Certification Requirements For Hospital Facilities

Vibration Isolation in Data Centers

Pre-requisites

STRUCTURAL TESTS AND SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

Ground Rules. PC1221 Fundamentals of Physics I. Kinematics. Position. Lectures 3 and 4 Motion in One Dimension. Dr Tay Seng Chuan

PROJECT SUMMARY. Scope of work details: (If phased construction, please see plan submittal guidelines.)

DS/EN 1990 DK NA:2013

EN Eurocode 1 Accidental Actions. Ton Vrouwenvelder TNO Bouw / TU Delft. EUROCODES Background and Applications

SECTION 7 Engineered Buildings Field Investigation

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF SEISMIC ISOLATION FOR SINGLE- TOWER CABLE STAYED BRIDGES

Dynamic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames Designed with Direct Displacement-Based Design

GUIDELINES FOR PLAN CHECK AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

3600 s 1 h. 24 h 1 day. 1 day

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Facilities Development Division. The Building Department for California s Hospitals

OPTIMAL DIAGRID ANGLE TO MINIMIZE DRIFT IN HIGH-RISE STEEL BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO WIND LOADS

Structural Design for Residential Construction

ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS IN VIETNAM IN TERMS OF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCES

Polynomial Degree and Finite Differences

A Four-Hour Advanced Internet Course on Chapter 16, Florida Building Code-Building, 5 th Edition (2014) Building Structural Design

Seismic Design and Performance Criteria for Large Storage Dams

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

Recommended Specifications, Commentaries, and Example Problems

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Chapter 7 Substructure Design General Substructure Considerations Foundation Design Process

ENGINEERING. In this issue of Engineering System. IBC Seismic Requirements and HVAC Systems A Short Course

FLOODED BATTERY RACKS SELECTION GUIDE FOR RDB & RDC SERIES, STANDBY POwER RACKS

Transcription:

Seismic Loads Based on IBC 2012/ASCE 7-10 Based on Section 1613.1 of IBC 2012, Every structure, and portion thereof, including nonstructural components that are permanently attached to structures and their supports and attachments, shall be designed and constructed to resist the effects of earthquake motions in accordance with ASCE 7, ecluding Chapter 14 and Appendi 11A. The seismic design category for a structure is permitted to be determined in accordance with Section 1613 or ASCE 7. Eceptions: 1. Detached one- and two-family dwellings, assigned to Seismic Design Category A, B or C, or located where the mapped short-period spectral response acceleration, S S, is less than 0.4 g. 2. The seismic force-resisting system of wood-frame buildings that conform to the provisions of Section 2308 are not required to be analyzed as specified in this section. 3. Agricultural storage structures intended only for incidental human occupancy. 4. Structures that require special consideration of their response characteristics and environment that are not addressed by this code or ASCE 7 and for which other regulations provide seismic criteria, such as vehicular bridges, electrical transmission towers, hydraulic structures, buried utility lines and their 160

Analysis Procedure 1- Determination of maimum considered earthquake and design spectral response accelerations: Determine the mapped maimum considered earthquake MCE spectral response accelerations, S s for short period (0.2 sec.) and S 1 for long period (1.0 sec.) using the spectral acceleration maps in IBC Figures 1613.3.1(1) through 1613.3.1(6). Where S 1 is less than or equal to 0.04 and S s is less than or equal to 0.15, the structure is permitted to be assigned to Seismic Design Category A. Determine the site class based on the soil properties. The site shall be classified as Site Class A, B, C, D, E or F in accordance with Chapter 20 of ASCE 7. Where the soil properties are not known in sufficient detail to determine the site class, Site Class D shall be used unless the building official or geotechnical data determines Site Class E or F soils are present at the site. Determine the maimum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations adjusted for site class effects, S MS at short period and S M 1 at long period in accordance with IBC 1613.3.3. where: S = F S S MS a s = M 1 Fv S 1 F a = Site coefficient defined in IBC Table 1613.3.3(1). F = Site coefficient defined in IBC Table 1613.3.3(2). v 161

Determine the 5% damped design spectral response accelerations S DS at short period and S D1 at long period in accordance with IBC 1613.3.4. S = (2 / 3) DS S MS D1 ( 2 / 3) SM 1 S = where: S MS = The maimum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations for short period as determined in section 1613.3.3. S M1 = The maimum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations for long period as determined in section 1613.3.3. 2- Determination of seismic design category and Importance factor: Risk categories of buildings and other structures are shown in IBC Table 1604.5. Importance factors, Ie, are shown in ASCE 7-10 Table 1.5-2. Structures classified as Risk Category I, II or III that are located where the mapped spectral response acceleration parameter at 1-second period, S 1, is greater than or equal to 0.75 shall be assigned to Seismic Design Category E. Structures classified as Risk Category IV that are located where the mapped spectral response acceleration parameter at 1-second period, S 1, is greater than or equal to 0.75 shall be assigned to Seismic Design Category F. All other structures shall be assigned to a seismic design category based on their risk category and the design spectral response acceleration parameters, 162

S DS and S D1, determined in accordance with Section 1613.3.4 or the site-specific procedures of ASCE 7. Each building and structure shall be assigned to the more severe seismic design category in accordance with Table 1613.3.5(1) or 1613.5.5(2), irrespective of the fundamental period of vibration of the structure. 163

3- Determination of the Seismic Base Shear: The structural analysis shall consist of one of the types permitted in ASCE 7-10 Table 12.6-1, based on the structure s seismic design category, structural system, dynamic properties, and regularity, or with the approval of the authority having jurisdiction, an alternative generally accepted procedure is permitted to be used. The analysis procedure selected shall be completed in accordance with the requirements of the corresponding section referenced in Table 12.6-1. 164

165

3.1 Equivalent Lateral Force Analysis: Section 12.8 of ASCE 7-10 shall be used. The seismic base shear V in a given direction is determined in accordance with the following equation: V = Cs W where: W = effective seismic weight The effective seismic weight, W, of a structure shall include the dead load above the base and other loads above the base as listed below: 1. In areas used for storage, a minimum of 25 percent of the floor live load shall be included. Eceptions a. Where the inclusion of storage loads adds no more than 5% to the effective seismic weight at that level, it need not be included in the effective seismic weight. b. Floor live load in public garages and open parking structures need not be included. 2. Where provision for partitions is required in the floor load design, the actual partition weight or a minimum weight of 0.48 kn/m 2 of floor area, whichever is greater. 3. Total operating weight of permanent equipment. C s = Seismic response coefficient = S DS ( R / I ) e R = response modification factor, given in ASCE 7-10 Table 12.2-1 I = importance factor e The value of C s shall not eceed the following: SD 1 Cs = for T TL T ( R / I ) e 166

C s S T D1 L = for 2 L T ( R / I ) e T > T The value of C s shall not be less than: C 0.044 S I 0.01 s = DS e For structures located where S 1 is equal to or greater than 0.6g, C s shall not be less than 0.5 S1 Cs = ( R / Ie ) where: T = fundamental period of the structure T L = long-period transition period, (given in ASCE 7-10 Figure 22), which is the transition period between the velocity and displacement-controlled portions of the design spectrum (about 5 seconds for Gaza Strip). An approimate value of T a may be obtained from: n T a = Ct h where: h n = height of the building above the base in meters C t = building period coefficient given in Table 12.8-2 = constant given in Table 12.8-2 The calculated fundamental period, T, cannot eceed the product of the coefficient, C u, in Table 12.8-1 times the approimate fundamental period, T a. 167

Table 12.8-1: Coefficient for upper limit on calculated period Design Spectral Response, S D1 Coefficient C u 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.15 0.1 In cases where moment resisting frames do not eceed twelve stories in height and having a minimum story height of 3 m, an approimate period T a in seconds in the following form can be used: T a = 0. 1 N where N = number of stories above the base 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 168

3.2 Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces: and F C = C v w i= 1 V v = n w h i k h k i F F F w n w w 1 h h h where: F = Lateral force at level C v = Vertical distribution factor V = total design lateral force or shear at the base of the building w and w i = the portions of W assigned to levels and i h and h i = heights to levels and i k = a distribution eponent related to the building period as follows: k = 1 for buildings with T less than or equal to 0.5 seconds k = 2 for buildings with T more than or equal to 2.5 seconds Interpolate between k = 1 and k = 2 for buildings with T between 0.5 and 2.5 3.3 Horizontal Distribution of Forces and Torsion: Horizontally distribute the shear V V = F i i= 1 where: F = portion of the seismic base shear, V, introduced at level i i Accidental Torsion, M ta M ta = V ( 0. 05 B) Total Torsion, M = M + M M T T t ta 169

3.4 Story Drift: The story drift,, is defined as the difference between the deflection of the center of mass at the top and bottom of the story being considered. Cd δ e δ = Ie Where: C d = deflection amplification factor, given in Table 12.2-1 δ = deflection determined by elastic analysis e 170

171

172

173

174

175

4- Seismic Load Effects and Combinations: 4.1 Seismic Load Effect Use E = ρ Q + 0. S D for these combinations E 2 DS Use E = ρ Q 0. S D for these combinations E 2 DS The vertical seismic load effect, to or less than 0.125. 4.2 Load Effect with Over-strength Factor S DS, is permitted to be taken as zero when SDs is equal 176

4.3 Redundancy: The value of ρ is permitted to equal 1.0 for the following: 1. Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category B or C. 2. Drift calculation and P-delta effects. 3. Design of collector elements. 4. Design of members or connections where the seismic load effects including overstrength factor are required for design. 5. Diaphragm loads. For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E, or F, ρ shall equal 1.3 unless one of the following two conditions is met, whereby ρ is permitted to be taken as 1.0: a. Each story resisting more than 35 percent of the base shear in the direction of interest shall comply with Table 12.3-3. b. Structures that are regular in plan at all levels provided that the seismic force-resisting systems consist of at least two bays of seismic force-resisting perimeter framing on each side of the structure in each orthogonal direction at each story resisting more than 35 percent of the base shear. The number of bays for a shear wall shall be calculated as the length of shear wall divided by the story height or two times the length of shear wall divided by the story height, hs, for light-frame construction. 177

Eample (8): For the building shown in Eample (1), using IBC 2012/ASCE 7-10, evaluate the forces at the floor levels perpendicular to aes 1-1, 2-2, 3-3 and 4-4. Note that site class is D, S s = 0. 25 g and S = 1 0. 10 g. Solution: Using Tables 1613.3.3(1) and 1613.3.3(2), short-period site coefficient F a =1. 60 and long-period site coefficient F v = 2. 40. Maimum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations adjusted for site class effects are evaluated. SMS = Fa Ss =1.60( 0.25 g) = 0. 4 g and SM1 = Fv S1 = 2.40( 0.10 g) = 0. 24 g The 5% damped design spectral response accelerations S DS at short period and S D1 at long period in accordance are evaluated. 2 2 SDS = SMS = ( 0.40 g) = 0. 267 g 3 3 2 2 SD 1 = SM1 = ( 0.24 g) = 0. 16 g 3 3 Occupancy importance factor, I e =1. 0 as evaluated from IBC 2012 Table 1604.5 and ASCE 7-10 Table 1604.5. From Table 1613.3.5(1) and for S DS = 0. 267 g, Seismic Design Category (SDC) is B. For S D 1 = 0. 16 g and using Table 1613.3.5(2), SDC is C. Therefore, seismic design category (SDC) is C. For ordinary shear walls and using ASCE 7-10 Table 12.2-1, response modification coefficient R =5. 0. The seismic base shear V in a given direction is determined in accordance with the following equation: V = C s W C s = S DS D1 ( R / I ) T ( R / I ) e S e 0.044 S 0.01 I DS e 0.75 Approimate period T a = 0.049( 21) = 0.48 sec. =1.58( 0.48) = 0.758sec. > 0.48 sec. C T u a 178

0.267 C s = = 0. 0534 5.0 i.e., C = 0. 0534 s < 0.16 (5.0) = 0.0667 > 0.044( 0.267) O.K ( 0.48) The seismic base shear V = 0.0534 ( 1814.4) = 96. 89 tons F Vertical distribution of forces: k w h Cv V and Cv = n k w h i = i= 1 K = 1.038 (from linear interpolation). Shear forces V = F i i= 1 Vertical Distribution of Forces: Level i h ( ) 1. 038 w h v w i 7 259.2 21 495.09 0.35 34.26 6 259.2 18 361.61 0.26 25.02 5 259.2 15 249.39 0.18 17.26 4 259.2 12 158.26 0.11 10.95 3 259.2 9 88.05 0.06 6.09 2 259.2 6 38.54 0.03 2.67 1 259.2 3 9.38 0.01 0.65 0 1814.4 0 1400.32 1.00 96.89 C F 179