Urine Barbiturate Analysis Using an Improved SPE Protocol and LC/MS/MS; Achieving Chromatographic Resolution of Isobaric Amobarbital & Pentobarbital

Similar documents
Extraction of Epinephrine, Norepinephrine and Dopamine from Human Plasma Using EVOLUTE EXPRESS WCX Prior to LC-MS/MS Analysis

The Use of Micro Flow LC Coupled to MS/MS in Veterinary Drug Residue Analysis

How To Test For Contamination In Large Volume Water

Analysis of the Vitamin B Complex in Infant Formula Samples by LC-MS/MS

Detection of Estrogens in Aqueous and Solid Environmental Matrices by Direct Injection LC-MS/MS

A High Throughput Automated Sample Preparation and Analysis Workflow for Comprehensive Forensic Toxicology Screening using LC/MS/MS

LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Docetaxel in Human Serum for Clinical Research

Determination of Anabolic Steroids in Horse Urine by SPE and LC-MS/MS

CONFIRMATION OF ZOLPIDEM BY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY

Fast, Reproducible LC-MS/MS Analysis of Dextromethorphan and Dextrorphan

Quantitative Analysis of Explosives in Surface Water Comparing Off-Line Solid Phase Extraction and Direct Injection LC/MS/MS

Opiates in Urine by SAMHSA GC/MS

SPE, LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Ethinyl Estradiol from Human Plasma

Thermo Scientific HyperSep Solid Phase Extraction Method Development Guide

AppNote 9/2013. Automated Derivatization, SPE Cleanup and LC/MS/MS Determination of Glyphosate and Other Polar Pesticides KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

Oasis HLB Cartridges and 96-Well Plates

S olid Ph ase Extraction (SP E) Method:

Overview. Triple quadrupole (MS/MS) systems provide in comparison to single quadrupole (MS) systems: Introduction

Overview. Purpose. Methods. Results

Technical Report. Automatic Identification and Semi-quantitative Analysis of Psychotropic Drugs in Serum Using GC/MS Forensic Toxicological Database

SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF NALTREXONE AND 6- -NALTREXOL IN SERUM BY HPLC

Making the Leap to LC/MS/MS: Enhancing and Accelerating Clinical Research and Forensic Toxicology Applications

MultiQuant Software Version 3.0 for Accurate Quantification of Clinical Research and Forensic Samples

MEPS - Micro Extraction by Packed Sorbent Online SPE for GC and LC sample preparation - Extraction to injection in a single process

Thermo Scientific SOLAµ SPE Plates Technical Guide. Consistent excellence. for bioanalysis

UHPLC/MS: An Efficient Tool for Determination of Illicit Drugs

Extraction of Cannabinoids in Marijuana and Edibles by QuEChERS

ApplicationNOTE Introduction

Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry

Quantitative analysis of anabolic steroids in control samples from food-producing animals using a column-switching LC-HESI-MS/MS assay

A New QuEChERS Dispersive SPE Material and Method for Analysis of Veterinary Drug Residue by LC-MS-MS

Thermo Scientific SOLA SPE cartridges and plates Technical Guide. Join the revolution. unparalleled performance

Overview. Introduction. AB SCIEX MPX -2 High Throughput TripleTOF 4600 LC/MS/MS System

High sensitivity assays using online SPE-LC-MS/MS -How low can you go? Mohammed Abrar Unilabs York Bioanalytical solutions, York, UK

# LCMS-35 esquire series. Application of LC/APCI Ion Trap Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides in Water

Fast and Accurate Analysis of Vitamin D Metabolites Using Novel Chromatographic Selectivity and Sample Preparation

AppNote 1/2014. Automated Hydrolysis, DPX Extraction and LC/MS/MS Analysis of Pain Management Drugs from Urine KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

Method Development of LC-MS/MS Analysis of Aminoglycoside Drugs: Challenges and Solutions

Simultaneous determination of aspartame, benzoic acid, caffeine, and saccharin in sugar-free beverages using HPLC

for SolEx TM HRP Cartridges SolEx TM HRP RSLC Columns

AppNote 1/2012. Rapid Cleanup and Comprehensive Screening of Pain Management Drugs in Urine using Automated Disposable Pipette Extraction and LC-MS/MS

Ultra Fast UHPLC-LCMSMS Method Development in Clinical Drug Monitoring

Guide to Reverse Phase SpinColumns Chromatography for Sample Prep

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 72

Jennifer L. Simeone and Paul D. Rainville Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA A P P L I C AT ION B E N E F I T S INT RO DU C T ION

A feasibility study of the determination of B-group vitamins in food by HPLC with Mass Spectrometric detection. LGC/R/2011/181 LGC Limited 2011

Technical Procedure for the Solid Phase Extraction of Acidic, Neutral and Basic Drugs for GC-MS Analysis

High-Throughput 3-D Chromatography Through Ion Exchange SPE

A Novel Approach to Low Volume Sample Preparation

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Aldosterone in Plasma for Clinical Research

Automated Method Development Utilizing Software-Based Optimization and Direct Instrument Control

Introduction. Methods. Sample Processing

The Theory of HPLC. Gradient HPLC

LC-MS/MS for Chromatographers

Screening and quantitative determination of drugs in diluted urine by UPLC-MS-MS

How To Develop A Recipe Card

Online SPE-LC-APCI-MS/MS for the Determination of Steroidal Hormones in Drinking Water

The Automated SPE Assay of Fipronil and Its Metabolites from Bee Pollen.

Cliquid Drug Screen & Quant Software for Routine Forensic Toxicology. great interest in forensic, toxicological and clinical research laboratories.

Using Natural Products Application Solution with UNIFI for the Identification of Chemical Ingredients of Green Tea Extract

Chemistry 321, Experiment 8: Quantitation of caffeine from a beverage using gas chromatography

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service, Office of Public Health Science

One Source Toxicology Laboratory, 1213 Genoa Red Bluff, Pasadena, Texas 77504

Application Note. Determination of Nitrite and Nitrate in Fruit Juices by UV Detection. Summary. Introduction. Experimental Sample Preparation

Affi-Prep Protein A Matrix Instruction Manual

Reversed Phase High Presssure Liquid Chromatograhphic Technique for Determination of Sodium Alginate from Oral Suspension

Determination of Tetracycline Antibiotics in Milk Using a Simple Strong Cation-Exchange SPE Cleanup Procedure and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Automation of Solid Phase Extraction and Column Chromatographic Cleanup

Making the Leap to LC/MS/MS: Enhancing and Accelerating Clinical Research and Forensic Toxicology Applications

The basic division explosives for forensic purposes is shown in Fig. 1

New drugs of abuse? A case study on Phenazepam & Methoxetamine

In-Depth Qualitative Analysis of Complex Proteomic Samples Using High Quality MS/MS at Fast Acquisition Rates

Extraction to Injection in a Single Process

Analysis of Free Bromate Ions in Tap Water using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide Column

Metabolomic Profiling of Accurate Mass LC-MS/MS Data to Identify Unexpected Environmental Pollutants

International GMP Requirements for Quality Control Laboratories and Recomendations for Implementation

Purification of reaction mixtures using flash chromatography.

Rapid Screening Method for Illicit Drugs, Using an Advanced Solid Core UHPLC Column and UHPLC System with MS/MS Detection

Development of a Systematic Toxicological Screening Method using an automated online-spe-lc-qqtof System (XLC-QqTOF)

Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Milk Using SPME and GC-MS/MS. No. GCMS No. SSI-GCMS Shilpi Chopra, Ph.D.

Innovative vs Traditional

LUMEFANTRINE Draft proposal for The International Pharmacopoeia (October 2006)

Pesticide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Simultaneous determination of L-ascorbic acid and D-iso-ascorbic acid (erythorbic acid) in wine by HPLC and UV-detection (Resolution Oeno 11/2008)

Rapid and Reproducible Amino Acid Analysis of Physiological Fluids for Clinical Research Using LC/MS/MS with the atraq Kit

GENERAL UNKNOWN SCREENING FOR DRUGS IN BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY LC/MS Luc Humbert1, Michel Lhermitte 1, Frederic Grisel 2 1

Chemical analysis service, Turner s Green Technology Group

AppNote 7/2009. Analysis of Drugs of Abuse using Automated Disposable Pipette Extraction and LC/MS/MS KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

Biocides main groups

Ádám Tölgyesi Joerg Stroka. Report EUR EN

HPLC Analysis of Acetaminophen Tablets with Waters Alliance and Agilent Supplies

Accurate Mass Screening Workflows for the Analysis of Novel Psychoactive Substances

High Sensitivity MS Determination of Carryover in a New Autosampler Design

Guidance for Industry

Intelligent use of Relative Response Factors in Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionisation Detection

AMD Analysis & Technology AG

Transcription:

Urine Barbiturate Analysis Using an Improved SPE Protocol and LC/MS/MS; Achieving Chromatographic Resolution of Isobaric Amobarbital & Pentobarbital Michael Rummel, Matthew Trass, Seyed Sadjadi, Jeff Layne, Sky Countryman, and Erica Pike Phenomenex, Inc., 411 Madrid Ave., Torrance, CA 90501 USA P89240811_L

Introduction Barbiturates are a notoriously difficult class of compounds to analyze in drugs of abuse testing panels. These neutral and fairlypolar compounds are difficult to retain on conventional Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) sorbents, limiting the wash strength and subsequent matrix cleanup. Additionally, two of the commonly screened barbiturates, pentobarbital and amobarbital, share the same mass transitions meaning full chromatographic resolution is necessary for LC/MS/MS analysis 1, 2. Achieving full resolution is a difficult task as the two barbiturates differ only in the position of a methyl group. Therefore, the goal of this work was to develop a streamlined SPE extraction for barbiturates in urine that removed potential matrix contaminants and a LC/MS/MS method that resolved pentobarbital, amobarbital, butalbital, secobarbital, and phenobarbital. Much emphasis was placed on the sensitivity and reproducibility of the method over a linear range from 40-125 % of the cutoff concentration set at 300 ng/ml.

Figure 1. Barbiturate Structures and Chemical Properties H 2 C N H HN H 3 C H N N H H N N H H 3 C N H H N N H HN Amobarbital logp: 1.88 Mass: 226.2722 Pentobarbital logp: 1.88 Mass: 226.2722 Butalbital logp: 1.56 Mass: 224.2563 Secobarbital logp: 2.01 Mass: 238.2829 Phenobarbital logp: 1.38 Mass: 232.2353 Note: Amobarbital and Pentobarbital are structural isomers.

Experimental Conditions Table 1. Extraction Method and HPLC Conditions Pre-treatment: To 2 ml of urine, add 2 ml of 100 mm Sodium acetate buffer (ph 5.0). ph should be ~4.0-6.0. Cartridge: Strata -X-Drug N, 100 mg/6 ml Part No.: 8B-S129-ECH Condition: Not Required Equilibrate: Not Required Load: Pre-treated urine samples Wash 1: 2 ml 0.1 N Hydrochloric acid (HCl) Wash 2: 2x 2 ml Methanol / 0.1 N HCl (30:70) Dry: 10 minutes at 10 in. of Hg Elute: 2 ml Ethyl acetate/isopropanol (85:15) Dry down: To dryness at 50 C Reconstitute: 1 ml of 10 % Acetonitrile Column: Kinetex 2.6 µm C18 Dimensions: 100 x 2.1 mm Part No.: 00D-4462-AN Mobile Phase: A: 5 mm Ammonium acetate buffer B: Acetonitrile Gradient: Time (min) B (%) 0 10 10 45 10.01 90 12 90 12.01 10 16 10 Flow Rate: 400 µl/min Detection: Negative mode (ESI) Temperature: Ambient

Table 2. LC/MS/MS Parameters (API 5000 ) CUR: 40.00 GS1: 60.00 GS2: 50.00 TEM: 550.00 ihe: N IS: -2500.00 CAD: 4.00 EP -10.00 CXP -13.00 Compound Q1 Mass (Da) Q3 Mass (Da) Dwell (msec) Amobarbital-1 225.00 182.10 100.00-66.00-19.00 Amobarbital-2 225.00 42.10 100.00-50.00-46.00 Butalbital-1 223.10 180.00 100.00-40.00-15.00 Butalbital-2 223.10 42.10 100.00-40.00-40.00 Pentobarbital-1 225.40 182.20 100.00-66.00-20.00 Pentobarbital-2 225.40 42.10 100.00-50.00-46.00 Phenobarbital-1 231.10 85.00 100.00-33.00-17.00 Phenobarbital-2 231.10 42.10 100.00-33.00-40.00 Secobarbital-1 237.00 194.20 100.00-44.00-18.00 Secobarbital-2 237.00 42.10 100.00-59.00-49.00 Butalbital-D5 228.00 41.60 100.00-40.00-15.00 Phenobarbital-D5 235.90 41.80 100.00-33.00-17.00 DP CE

Table 3. Comparison of Solid Phase Extraction Procedures Used in this Study Versus Traditional C8+SCX Sorbent Methods Step Strata-X-Drug N 100 mg/6 ml Part No. 8B-S129-ECH Mixed-Mode Silica-Based SPE Sorbent 200 mg/10 ml Strata-X-Drug N Solvent Savings Condition 0 ml 3 ml 3 ml Equilibrate 1 0 ml 3 ml 3 ml Equilibrate 2 0 ml 1 ml 1 ml Load Pre-treated urine sample Pre-treated urine sample -- Wash 1 2 ml 3 ml 1 ml Wash 2 4 ml 1 ml -3 ml Dry -- -- -- Wash 3 0 ml 2 ml 2 ml Elute 2 ml 3 ml 1 ml TTAL SLVENT SAVINGS 8 ml per sample

Results and Discussion Barbiturate analysis has always been one of the more challenging drug classes to analyze for the toxicologist. With amobarbital and pentobarbital being structural isomers (Figure 1), separation using liquid chromatography requires a combination of excellent selectivity and high efficiency. Furthermore, extracting this drug class on traditionally used C8+SCX SPE sorbents requires very low wash strengths to prevent analyte loss and poor recovery. This results in an inadequate matrix cleanup. Development and optimization of the SPE procedure was performed using 100 mg/6 ml Strata-X-Drug N cartridges. 2 ml urine samples were prepped at three concentrations, (120 ng/ml, 300 ng/ml, and 375 ng/ml (n=3) at each concentration) to establish linearity of the method. Three additional samples were prepared at 300 ng/ml and measured against an extracted matrix matched standard to establish absolute recovery and reproducibility of the extraction. Strata-X-Drug N requires no conditioning allowing for direct sample loading and the elimination of three steps as compared to a traditional procedure. Following the sample load, 2 washes of 0.1N Hydrochloric acid (HCl) and 30 % Methanol (MeH) in 0.1N HCl, a dry step, and an elution of (85:15) (v:v) Ethyl Acetate:Isopropanol were chosen. The use of a 30 % MeH wash is much higher in strength than conventional procedures and resulted in excellent matrix cleanup measured by a clean baseline and a visually clean sample, resulting in time and solvent saving 3 (Table 3). Post extraction samples were analyzed via LC/MS/MS using an Agilent 1200 LC fitted with a Kinetex 2.6 µm C18 100 x 2.1 mm core-shell HPLC/UHPLC column. The mass spectrometer used was an API 5000 in ESI (-) mode.

Results and Discussion Many column chemistries were screened in order to find one capable of separating amobarbital and pentobarbital in under 20 minutes. The Kinetex 2.6 µm C18 column provided the best results separating the two isomers in under 12 minutes. A majority of comparable historical LC methods required runs > 25 mins to achieve the same resolution. Baseline resolution can be achieved with a shallower, longer gradient, but this 12 minute method allowed for accurate peak quantitation (Figure 2). Method performance, measured by recovery, RSD, and linearity over the 120 ng/ml 375 ng/ml range, confirmed great overall results. Linearity correlation figures ranged from 0.989 to 0.998, absolute recovery values ranged from 89.7 % to 102.6 %, and RSD values ranged from 0.9 to 6.7 %. (Figure 3 and Table 4). The study was repeated over 3 different days resulting in inter-assay accuracy and precision ranging from 99.1 102.1 % and 4.9-6.4 % respectively, across all analytes. Method LLQ was set at 10 ng/ml with a S/N of > 100 for all analytes.

Figure 2. LC/MS/MS Chromatogram of Barbiturates Intensity, cps 2.6e6 2.5e6 2.4e6 2.3e6 2.2e6 2.1e6 2.0e6 1.9e6 1.8e6 1.7e6 1.6e6 1.5e6 1.4e6 1.3e6 1.2e6 1.1e6 1.0e6 9.0e5 8.0e5 7.0e5 6.0e5 5.0e5 4.0e5 3.0e5 2.0e5 1.0e5 0.0 1,2 3,4 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 168 191 215 239 263 287 310 334 358 382 406 429 453 477 501 5 6 7 Sample: 1. Phenobarbital-D5 2. Phenobarbital 3. Butalbital-D5 4. Butalbital 5. Pentobarbital 6. Amobarbital 7. Secobarbital App ID 19724 min.

Figure 3. Linearity Curves Analyte Area / IS Area 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 Analyte Conc. / IS Conc. Analyte Area / IS Area 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 Analyte Conc. / IS Conc. Three point calibration curves (40 %, 100 %, 125 % of cutoff concentration) for Phenobarbital (left) and Butalbital (right)

Table 4. Recovery, RSD, and Linearity Analyte Average absolute recovery (%) RSD (n=3) Linearity R 2 Value Phenobarbital 89.7 3.5 % 0.994 Butalbital 93.2 5.5 % 0.998 Pentobarbital 100.4 3.8 % 0.989 Amobarbital 94.0 6.7 % 0.991 Secobarbital 102.6 0.9 % 0.990

Conclusion 1. The SPE extraction for amobarbital, pentobarbital, butalbital, secobarbital, and phenobarbital produced a clean extract due to the 30 % MeH wash and still resulted in high absolute recoveries. 2. The SPE workload was cut down considerably by using Strata-X- Drug N, a sorbent that requires no conditioning. 3. Quantitative resolution of the structural isomers amobarbital and pentobarbital was achieved. 4. The established method was verified to be very reproducible and rugged over a multi-day validation.

References 1..Suzuki, K. Watanabe. Drugs and poisons in humans: a handbook of practical analysis. p.306-309, 2005 2. L.K. Sørensen. Determination of acidic and neutral therapeutic drugs in human blood by liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry, Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Mar 20;206 (1-3):119-26 3. M.Telepchak, G. Chaney, T. August. Forensic and clinical applications of solid phase extraction. p.183-190 Trademarks Kinetex is a registered trademark of Phenomenex, Inc., in the United States, European Union, and other jurisdictions. Strata-X is a trademark of Phenomenex, Inc. Agilent is a registered trademark of Agilent Technologies, Inc. API 5000 is a trademark of AB Sciex Pte Ltd. Strata-X is patented by Phenomenex, Inc. U.S. Patent no. 7,119,145 Disclaimer Phenomenex, Inc. is not affiliated with Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2011 Phenomenex, Inc. All rights reserved.