NOISE POWER RATIO MEASUREMENT TUTORIAL By Allen Katz and Robert Gray Linearizer Technology Inc.

Similar documents
RF Network Analyzer Basics

Ralph L. Brooker, Member, IEEE. Andrew Corporation, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA

The front end of the receiver performs the frequency translation, channel selection and amplification of the signal.

HF Receiver Testing. Issues & Advances. (also presented at APDXC 2014, Osaka, Japan, November 2014)

Optimizing IP3 and ACPR Measurements

AN-837 APPLICATION NOTE

Introduction to Receivers

Test Report: Yaesu FTDX-1200, S/N 3F02051 (loaned by Bill Trippett W7VP)

Frequency Response of Filters

Agilent AN 1316 Optimizing Spectrum Analyzer Amplitude Accuracy

Voltage. Oscillator. Voltage. Oscillator

Application Note Noise Frequently Asked Questions

Agilent AN 1315 Optimizing RF and Microwave Spectrum Analyzer Dynamic Range. Application Note

MATRIX TECHNICAL NOTES

Lecture 1-6: Noise and Filters

Keysight Technologies Understanding the Fundamental Principles of Vector Network Analysis. Application Note

Tx/Rx A high-performance FM receiver for audio and digital applicatons

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. LAB 1 - Introduction to USRP

F = S i /N i S o /N o

RF Communication System. EE 172 Systems Group Presentation

RF Measurements Using a Modular Digitizer

Maximizing Receiver Dynamic Range for Spectrum Monitoring

VCO Phase noise. Characterizing Phase Noise

Bandwidth-dependent transformation of noise data from frequency into time domain and vice versa

RF System Design and Analysis Software Enhances RF Architectural Planning

Interpreting the Information Element C/I

RF SYSTEM DESIGN OF TRANSCEIVERS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS

Measurement of Adjacent Channel Leakage Power on 3GPP W-CDMA Signals with the FSP

Application Note Receiving HF Signals with a USRP Device Ettus Research

Chapter 12: The Operational Amplifier

AN-007 APPLICATION NOTE MEASURING MAXIMUM SUBWOOFER OUTPUT ACCORDING ANSI/CEA-2010 STANDARD INTRODUCTION CEA-2010 (ANSI) TEST PROCEDURE

CBS RECORDS PROFESSIONAL SERIES CBS RECORDS CD-1 STANDARD TEST DISC

Understanding the Fundamental Principles of Vector Network Analysis. Application Note Table of Contents. Page

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

Audio processing and ALC in the FT-897D

Automatic compression measurement using network analyzers

Lecture 1-10: Spectrograms

Making OSNR Measurements In a Modulated DWDM Signal Environment

TCOM 370 NOTES 99-4 BANDWIDTH, FREQUENCY RESPONSE, AND CAPACITY OF COMMUNICATION LINKS

Chapter 1. Introduction

isim ACTIVE FILTER DESIGNER NEW, VERY CAPABLE, MULTI-STAGE ACTIVE FILTER DESIGN TOOL

DVB-T. The echo performance of. receivers. Theory of echo tolerance. Ranulph Poole BBC Research and Development

Agilent Creating Multi-tone Signals With the N7509A Waveform Generation Toolbox. Application Note

Spectrum Level and Band Level

Timing Errors and Jitter

The Phase Modulator In NBFM Voice Communication Systems

Sampling Theorem Notes. Recall: That a time sampled signal is like taking a snap shot or picture of signal periodically.

Angle Modulation, II. Lecture topics FM bandwidth and Carson s rule. Spectral analysis of FM. Narrowband FM Modulation. Wideband FM Modulation

FUNDAMENTALS OF MODERN SPECTRAL ANALYSIS. Matthew T. Hunter, Ph.D.

Understanding Dynamic Range in Acceleration Measurement Systems. February 2013 By: Bruce Lent

R&S FSW signal and spectrum analyzer: best in class now up to 50 GHz

GSM frequency planning

RFSPACE CLOUD-IQ #CONNECTED SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO

Filter Design in Thirty Seconds

EE 186 LAB 2 FALL Network Analyzer Fundamentals and Two Tone Linearity

HYBRID FIR-IIR FILTERS By John F. Ehlers

APSYN420A/B Specification GHz Low Phase Noise Synthesizer

Agilent EEsof EDA.

Visual System Simulator White Paper

Taking the Mystery out of the Infamous Formula, "SNR = 6.02N dB," and Why You Should Care. by Walt Kester

GSM/EDGE Output RF Spectrum on the V93000 Joe Kelly and Max Seminario, Verigy

MICROPHONE SPECIFICATIONS EXPLAINED

Amplifier for Small Magnetic and Electric Wideband Receiving Antennas (model AAA-1B)

Voice Communication Package v7.0 of front-end voice processing software technologies General description and technical specification

More Filter Design on a Budget

Laboratory #5: RF Filter Design

ANALYZER BASICS WHAT IS AN FFT SPECTRUM ANALYZER? 2-1

Frequency response: Resonance, Bandwidth, Q factor

Direct Digital Amplification (DDX ) The Evolution of Digital Amplification

K2 CW Filter Alignment Procedures Using Spectrogram 1 ver. 5 01/17/2002

Application Note: Spread Spectrum Oscillators Reduce EMI for High Speed Digital Systems

Lab 5 Operational Amplifiers

Analog Filters. A common instrumentation filter application is the attenuation of high frequencies to avoid frequency aliasing in the sampled data.

Sound Pressure Measurement

How PLL Performances Affect Wireless Systems

RANDOM VIBRATION AN OVERVIEW by Barry Controls, Hopkinton, MA

Sophomore Physics Laboratory (PH005/105)

PIEZO FILTERS INTRODUCTION

The demo guide contains

SUMMARY. Additional Digital/Software filters are included in Chart and filter the data after it has been sampled and recorded by the PowerLab.

Advanced Photon Source. RF Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Robert M. Lill

CHAPTER 6 Frequency Response, Bode Plots, and Resonance

Multi-Carrier GSM with State of the Art ADC technology

CTCSS REJECT HIGH PASS FILTERS IN FM RADIO COMMUNICATIONS AN EVALUATION. Virgil Leenerts WØINK 8 June 2008

Understanding CIC Compensation Filters

Probability and Random Variables. Generation of random variables (r.v.)

FREQUENCY RESPONSE ANALYZERS

Simulating Envelope Tracking with Keysight Advanced Design System. Application Note

Specifying Plasma Deposited Hard Coated Optical Thin Film Filters. Alluxa Engineering Staff

Uniboard based digital receiver

UGF W, 1 GHz, 26V Broadband RF Power N-Channel Enhancement-Mode Lateral MOSFET

Fundamentals of modern UV-visible spectroscopy. Presentation Materials

RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE AND CAPACITY REDUCTION IN DSL

FFT Spectrum Analyzers

Non-Data Aided Carrier Offset Compensation for SDR Implementation

Dithering in Analog-to-digital Conversion

The Sonometer The Resonant String and Timbre Change after plucking

Coexistence Tips the Market for Wireless System Simulation Chris Aden, MathWorks

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN VECTOR NETWORK ANALYZER

Network analyzer and spectrum analyzer two in one

Transcription:

NOISE POWER RATIO MEASUREMENT TUTORIAL By Allen Katz and Robert Gray Linearizer Technology Inc. Introduction The performance of high power amplifiers with many carriers (>10) is normally tested using a noise power ratio (NPR) measurement technique. In this test, white noise is used to simulate the presence of many carriers of random amplitude and phase. The white noise is first passed through a bandpass filter (BPF) to produce an approximately square spectral pedestal of noise of about the same bandwidth as the signals being simulated. This signal is then passed through a narrow band-reject filter to produce a deep notch (typ. >50dB) at the center of the noise pedestal as shown in Figure 1. Noise Pedestal Noise BPF Figure 1. An NPR test generator consists of a white noise source connected in cascade with a bandpass filter and a notch filter. The notch depth can be measured with a Spectrum Analyzer. This noise signal is used to excite the test amplifier. Amplification will produce IMD products, which tend to fill in the notch. The depth of the notch at the output of the amplifier can be observed with a spectrum analyzer, and is the measure of the NPR. NPR can be considered a measure of multi-carrier intermodulation ratio (C/I). NPR differs from multi-carrier C/I in that it is the ratio of carrier plus intermodulation to intermodulation (C+I/I). At higher ratios (C/I > 20 db), the two measures will approach the same value. Test Hardware Considerations The bandwidth of the noise source should be much wider the bandwidth of the BPF to insure the statistical distribution of the noise power resembles a random phase multicarrier source. The width of the noise pedestal is usually made equal to bandwidth of the channel under test. In theory the NPR measured should be independent of the noise pedestal s bandwidth. In practice so called amplifier memory effects may cause NPR

to degrade over wider bandwidths. The width of the notch should be about 1 percent or less of the width of the noise pedestal. A picture of an actual NPR noise pedestal and notch details as viewed on a spectrum analyzer is shown in Figure 2. Location Depth >45 db Figure 2. Actual NPR test signal as viewed on a spectrum analyzer NPR test signals are usually generated at IF and upconverted to the microwave band of interest. Care must be taken to insure this process does not degrade the notch depth. In wideband NPR testing, the noise figure of the amplifiers can often limit the maximum NPR measured. -10 TRUE NPR for FINITE NOTCH DEPTH TRUE NPR in -15-20 -25-30 -35-40 NOTCH = 30.0 db NOTCH = 35.0 db NOTCH = 40.0 db -45-50 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 MEASURED NPR in db Figure 3. Correction chart for true NPR for finite notch depth

A systematic error is introduced when the measured NPR is close to the depth of the testset notch. This error is most significant when the bottom of the measured notched is within 10 db of the test-set notch depth or of the spectrum analyzers noise floor. This error can be corrected with the use of the following correction. NPR = 10 LOG(10 -(NPRm/10) 10 -(NPRt/10) ), where NPRm is the measured NPR and NPRt is the NPR of the test signal. This relationship is plotted in Figure 3. As NPRm approaches NPRt measurement precision will be degrading even when the correction is used. Another common source of NPR measurement error involves improper choice of the reference level for the notch depth. depth should be measured relative to the average pedestal power level. When the top of the pedestal is rippled or titled, the proper reference level should be determined by averaging the changing levels across the top of the pedestal. Care should be taken to insure the pedestal level near the notch corresponds to this value. If it does not, an appropriate correction factor should be added to the observed notch depth. Bounds on Amplifier NPR All real amplifiers have some maximum output power or saturation level. Once an amplifier has saturated, it is impossible to obtain more output power by driving the amplifier harder. Maximum linearity is achieved when an amplifier maintains a constant gain (and phase) to saturation, and a constant output level beyond saturation.this response is referred to as ideal limiter. Figure 4. An ideal limiter maintains constant gain and phase to saturation. Figure 5 shows the 2-tone C/I and NPR achievable by an ideal limiter characteristic. This linearity is the best an amplifier can produce and sets an upper bound on the

improvement linearization can produce. Note the 2-tone C/I goes to infinity for an output power backoff (OPBO) from saturation of greater than 3 db. This result occurs because the peak-envelope-power (PEP) of a 2-tone signal is 3 db greater than its average power. A signal backed-off by more than 3 db never experiences clipping at saturation, and is subject to only a linear response. However to achieve this same level of performance with a larger number of carriers requires a greater level of OPBO. This is a consequence of the increase in peak-envelope-power (PEP) with carrier number: PEP = NP av where N is the number of carriers and P av is the average power of the overall signal. For 4 carriers the OPBO for no IMD, increases to 6 db. Figure 5. C/I of an ideal limiter for 2 and an infinite number of carriers (NPR). Measured NPR of Amplifiers The NPRs of a typical TWTA and a linearized TWTA are shown in Figure 6. For an NPR ratio of 25 db, the addition of a linearizer provides more than a 4 db increase in amplifier power. This value is greater than the corresponding increase in power for a 2-carrier test at the same C/I ratio. In general the greater the number of carriers, the greater is the output power advantage of linearization for a given C/I ratio. In Figure 5 similar NPR measurements are shown for a class AB SSPA. At an NPR of 25 db approximately the same improvement in output power is achieved by linearization.

35 30 NPR in db 25 20 15 10 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 OPBO in db Figure 6. NPR predicts the improvement provided by linearization of a TWTA with many carriers. 35 NPR in db 30 25 20 15 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 OPBO in db Figure 7. NPR of class AB SSPA. Summary NPR is a convenient method for evaluating the linear performance of amplifiers when operated with many carriers. Care must be taken in selecting the proper NPR test set. When measured properly NPR provides an accurate and repeatable measure of amplifier performance.