Experiment: Viscosity Measurement B

Similar documents
XI / PHYSICS FLUIDS IN MOTION 11/PA

The Viscosity of Fluids

Experiment 3 Pipe Friction

Dimensional analysis is a method for reducing the number and complexity of experimental variables that affect a given physical phenomena.

INVESTIGATION OF FALLING BALL VISCOMETRY AND ITS ACCURACY GROUP R1 Evelyn Chou, Julia Glaser, Bella Goyal, Sherri Wykosky

Collision of a small bubble with a large falling particle

The Viscosity of Fluids

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

Millikan Oil Drop Experiment Matthew Norton, Jurasits Christopher, Heyduck William, Nick Chumbley. Norton 0

Basic Equations, Boundary Conditions and Dimensionless Parameters

SIZE OF A MOLECULE FROM A VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT

du u U 0 U dy y b 0 b

Lecture 24 - Surface tension, viscous flow, thermodynamics

CFD SIMULATION OF SDHW STORAGE TANK WITH AND WITHOUT HEATER

MEASUREMENT OF VISCOSITY OF LIQUIDS BY THE STOKE S METHOD

Viscous flow in pipe

Experiment #4 Sugar in Soft Drinks and Fruit Juices. Laboratory Overview CHEM August 2010

Swissmetro travels at high speeds through a tunnel at low pressure. It will therefore undergo friction that can be due to:

FLUID MECHANICS IM0235 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS - CB _1

Determination of Acceleration due to Gravity

Experiment # 3: Pipe Flow

Archimedes Principle. Biological Systems

AP1 Oscillations. 1. Which of the following statements about a spring-block oscillator in simple harmonic motion about its equilibrium point is false?

Natural Convection. Buoyancy force

1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids

The ratio of inertial to viscous forces is commonly used to scale fluid flow, and is called the Reynolds number, given as:

Contents. Microfluidics - Jens Ducrée Physics: Navier-Stokes Equation 1

Use of OpenFoam in a CFD analysis of a finger type slug catcher. Dynaflow Conference 2011 January , Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Abaqus/CFD Sample Problems. Abaqus 6.10

PHYSICAL QUANTITIES AND UNITS

Contents. Microfluidics - Jens Ducrée Physics: Fluid Dynamics 1

4 Microscopic dynamics

Buoyancy Problem Set

A Determination of g, the Acceleration Due to Gravity, from Newton's Laws of Motion

EXPERIMENT 3 Analysis of a freely falling body Dependence of speed and position on time Objectives

General Physics Lab: Atwood s Machine

Fluid Mechanics: Static s Kinematics Dynamics Fluid

Convection in water (an almost-incompressible fluid)

Dimensional Analysis

Mathematical Modeling and Engineering Problem Solving

Pressure in Fluids. Introduction

Implementation of a flexible fiber model in a general purpose CFD code

1 The basic equations of fluid dynamics

Prelab Exercises: Hooke's Law and the Behavior of Springs

Lab 8: Ballistic Pendulum

L r = L m /L p. L r = L p /L m

Physics Notes Class 11 CHAPTER 3 MOTION IN A STRAIGHT LINE

HEAVY OIL FLOW MEASUREMENT CHALLENGES

OUTCOME 3 TUTORIAL 5 DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

Lecture 5 Hemodynamics. Description of fluid flow. The equation of continuity

Dimensional Analysis

Physics Lab Report Guidelines

APPLICATION OF TRANSIENT WELLBORE SIMULATOR TO EVALUATE DELIVERABILITY CURVE ON HYPOTHETICAL WELL-X

Heat Transfer From A Heated Vertical Plate

Introduction to COMSOL. The Navier-Stokes Equations

14 DRIFT FLUX MODELS

Fluids and Solids: Fundamentals

Dynamic Process Modeling. Process Dynamics and Control

Chapter 13 - Solutions

ANALYTICAL ANALYSIS OF BLOOD SPATTER TRAJECTORY FOR CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION

PHYSICS FUNDAMENTALS-Viscosity and flow

FLUID FORCES ON CURVED SURFACES; BUOYANCY

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

CEE 370 Fall Laboratory #3 Open Channel Flow

Basic Principles in Microfluidics

Chapter 2. Derivation of the Equations of Open Channel Flow. 2.1 General Considerations

INTRODUCTION TO FLUID MECHANICS

CE 6303 MECHANICS OF FLUIDS L T P C QUESTION BANK PART - A

Conceptual Questions: Forces and Newton s Laws

Sink depth of trolled fishing lines

Version A Page The diagram shows two bowling balls, A and B, each having a mass of 7.00 kilograms, placed 2.00 meters apart.

Student Exploration: Archimedes Principle

Forces. Definition Friction Falling Objects Projectiles Newton s Laws of Motion Momentum Universal Forces Fluid Pressure Hydraulics Buoyancy

CFD Simulation of Subcooled Flow Boiling using OpenFOAM

Newton s Second Law. ΣF = m a. (1) In this equation, ΣF is the sum of the forces acting on an object, m is the mass of

Free Convection Film Flows and Heat Transfer

FLUID DYNAMICS. Intrinsic properties of fluids. Fluids behavior under various conditions

Fluid Mechanics Prof. S. K. Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Acceleration Due to Gravity

Lecture L2 - Degrees of Freedom and Constraints, Rectilinear Motion

When the fluid velocity is zero, called the hydrostatic condition, the pressure variation is due only to the weight of the fluid.

Open channel flow Basic principle

Head Loss in Pipe Flow ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

Practice Problems on Boundary Layers. Answer(s): D = 107 N D = 152 N. C. Wassgren, Purdue University Page 1 of 17 Last Updated: 2010 Nov 22

Three Methods for Calculating the Buoyant Force Gleue: Physics

Kinetic Energy (A) stays the same stays the same (B) increases increases (C) stays the same increases (D) increases stays the same.

Distinguished Professor George Washington University. Graw Hill

4.What is the appropriate dimensionless parameter to use in comparing flow types? YOUR ANSWER: The Reynolds Number, Re.

Turn off all electronic devices

Salem Community College Course Syllabus. Course Title: Physics I. Course Code: PHY 101. Lecture Hours: 2 Laboratory Hours: 4 Credits: 4

Lecture 3 Fluid Dynamics and Balance Equa6ons for Reac6ng Flows

11 Navier-Stokes equations and turbulence

Chapter 8: Flow in Pipes

Problem s s o v o t 1 2 a t2. Ball B: s o 0, v o 19 m s, a 9.81 m s 2. Apply eqn. 12-5: When the balls pass each other: s A s B. t 2.

v v ax v a x a v a v = = = Since F = ma, it follows that a = F/m. The mass of the arrow is unchanged, and ( )

Physics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives

Physics Notes Class 11 CHAPTER 6 WORK, ENERGY AND POWER

W i f(x i ) x. i=1. f(x i ) x = i=1

Buoyant Force and Archimedes Principle

FREE FALL. Introduction. Reference Young and Freedman, University Physics, 12 th Edition: Chapter 2, section 2.5

Transcription:

Experiment: Viscosity Measurement B The Falling Ball Viscometer Purpose The purpose of this experiment is to measure the viscosity of an unknown polydimethylsiloxiane (PDMS) solution with a falling ball viscometer. Learning Objectives This laboratory exercise involves measurements and analysis related to fluid density, fluid viscosity, and hydrodynamic interactions. After successfully completing this exercise students should be able to - Determine the density of a spherical particle. - Determine the density and viscosity of an unknown fluid. - Determine the uncertainty in the density and viscosity measurements - Identify any discrepancies within the experimental results and provide a plausible explanation for the observed discrepancies. Apparatus Figure 1 is a schematic of a falling ball viscometer. A sphere of known density and diameter is dropped into a large reservoir of the unknown fluid. At steady state, the viscous drag and buoyant force of the sphere is balanced by the gravitational force. In this experiment, the speed at which a sphere falls through a viscous fluid is measured by recording the sphere position as a function of time. Position is measured with a vertical scale (ruler) and time is measured with a stopwatch. [1]

D p Sphere Scale PDMS Fluid Figure 1. Schematic of a falling ball viscometer where a sphere of diameter, D p, is dropped into a tank of diameter, D T. The sphere position is measured with the vertical scale at known times. D T Theory When a sphere is placed in an infinite incompressible Newtonian fluid, it initially accelerates due to gravity. After this brief transient period, the sphere achieves a steady settling velocity (a constant terminal velocity). For the velocity to be steady (no change in linear momentum), Newton s second law requires that the three forces acting on the sphere, gravity (F G ), buoyancy (F B ), and fluid drag (F D ) balance. These forces all act vertically and are as follows: gravity: F G = π 6 ρ pd p 3 g (1) buoyancy: F B = + π 6 ρd p 3 g (2) fluid drag: F D = π 8 ρv p 2 D p 2 C D (3) where ρ p is the density of the solid sphere, ρ is the density of the fluid, D p is the diameter of the solid sphere, g is the gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s 2 ), V p is the velocity of the sphere, and C D is the drag coefficient. The gravitational force is equal to the weight of the sphere, and the sign is negative because it is directed downward. The buoyancy force acts upwards and is equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. The drag force acts upwards and is written in terms of a dimensionless drag coefficient. The drag coefficient is a unique function of the dimensionless Reynolds number, Re. The Reynolds number can be interpreted as the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces. For a sphere settling in a viscous fluid the Reynolds number is [2]

Re = ρv p D p μ (4) where µ is the viscosity of the fluid. If the drag coefficient as a function of Reynolds number is known the terminal velocity can be calculated. For the Stokes regime, Re<1, the drag coefficient can be determined either analytical (as will be shown later in the course) or empirically. Under these conditions C D = 24/Re and the settling velocity is V p = gd p 2 (ρ p ρ)/18μ (5) In the intermediate region, 1<Re<1000 the drag coefficient is roughly calculated empirically as C D = Re -0.6 with the corresponding settling velocity V p 2g 27 (ρ p ρ 1) 5/7 D p 8/7 ( ρ μ )3/7 (6) The falling ball viscometer is one of the practical applications of either Eqn.(5) or Eqn. (6). The falling ball viscometer requires the measurement of a sphere s terminal velocity, usually by measuring the time required for sphere to fall a given distance. Falling sphere viscometers are in common use as are viscometers that use the rise time of a bubble. In this experiment we measure the position of a sphere as a function of time and determine the steady state settling velocity. From this, we can calculate the viscosity from either Eqn. (5) or Eqn. (6) depending on the Reynolds number. For Re<1 the viscosity would be μ = gd p 2 ρ p ρ t p /18L (7) where t p is the time required for a sphere to fall a distance, L. If 1 < Re < 1000, the viscosity could be determined from μ = [ 2g 27 (ρ p ρ 1)]5/3 D p 8/3 ( L t p ) 7/3 ρ (8) Note: The proceeding analysis assumes that the fluid reservoir is an incompressible Newtonian fluid of infinite size. We considered the fluid to be infinite to neglect hydrodynamic interactions between the sphere and the container wall. For practical purposes, the surroundings can be considered infinite if the nearest wall is at least 20 sphere diameters away. In any real situation we may have to account for possible influence of the container walls. From dimensional analysis (to be discussed later in lecture), we would expect the drag coefficient to be corrected by a function which would depend on the ratio of the container diameter to the sphere diameter. Procedure Regardless of the Re, the settling velocity depends on the sphere diameter, the sphere density, the fluid density, and the gravitational constant. For each sphere examined [3]

1. Measure the diameter of the sphere. Measure it multiple times to gain an accurate measurement and to determine the relative error in the measurement. 2. Measure the weight of the sphere 3. Calculate the sphere density Since only one fluid will be examined, measure the fluid density by weighing a known volume fluid. With the fluid density and the particle density determined, the viscosity can be determined by measuring the position of the sphere as a function of time as it settles through the unknown fluid. For each sphere 1. Place the sphere near the top of the fluid reservoir. Try to get the sphere as close as possible to the air-fluid interface. 2. Release the sphere and begin timing. 3. As the sphere settles, record its position as a function of time. Note: some spheres may settle faster than others and may be difficult to measure without knowledge of its settling velocity. For the denser spheres drop a similar sphere to initially estimate its settling rate. In addition, it may be more efficient to have one person drop the sphere, one person run the stopwatch, and the third to read the time off the stopwatch. A number of spheres are available to measure the viscosity. For this experiment measure the settling velocity for the range of sphere diameters provided. For each sphere size selected run multiple spheres (2-4) to provide sufficient data for the terminal velocity of each sphere type. Data Reduction 1. For each sphere examined, plot the position as function of time and determine the terminal velocity of the sphere from the slope (assuming the data is linear). 2. From the terminal velocity, calculate the viscosity of the unknown fluid for each sphere using Eqn. (7). Is the equation valid for the measured velocities and calculated viscosity? 3. Are the measured viscosities consistent? If the measured viscosities aren t consistent, plot the measured viscosity for each sphere as a function of sphere diameter. Does the data approach a constant value at large or small sphere diameters? Report 1. Include a figure showing the sphere position as a function of time and discuss the valid range useful for measuring the terminal velocity. 2. Report the viscosity of the PDMS fluid. [4]

3. Which measurements (data points, results) are most reliable? Which measurements are most limited by your ability to measure time, diameter, or mass? Justify your answers. 4. Discuss discrepancies and anomalies in your data. 5. Does the measured viscosities depend on the size of the sphere? Is it independent of size for a given size range? If the viscosity data shows a size dependence, what is plausible cause for the observed dependence? 6. Compare the measured viscosity to viscosity measured with the Thomas-Stormer viscometer. Within error, are there any discrepancies? What are the measurement errors associated with each technique? [5]