Generic assessment procedures for determining protective actions during a reactor accident



Similar documents
Fukushima Accident: Radioactive Releases and Potential Dose Consequences

Source Term Determination Methods of the Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration Emergency Response Team

Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30 March 2011

SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BIOSPHERE MODEL TO ESTIMATE RADIOLOGICAL DOSE IN THE GOLDSIM ENVIRONMENT

Boiling Water Reactor Systems

B I N G O B I N G O. Hf Cd Na Nb Lr. I Fl Fr Mo Si. Ho Bi Ce Eu Ac. Md Co P Pa Tc. Uut Rh K N. Sb At Md H. Bh Cm H Bi Es. Mo Uus Lu P F.

11. Radioactive Waste Management AP1000 Design Control Document

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 4 Moles & Stoichiometry Answers

INES The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 4 Moles & Stoichiometry

DEMONSTRATION ACCELERATOR DRIVEN COMPLEX FOR EFFECTIVE INCINERATION OF 99 Tc AND 129 I

Nuclear Emergency Response Program

ORTEC DET-SW-UPG. Latest Software Features. Ease of Use. Source Location with the Detective V3 Software

Ionizing Radiation, Czech Republic, CMI (Czech Metrology Institute)

Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response

What if... A nuclear waste accident scenario in Los Angeles, CA. Richard Wiles James R. Cox. June 27,

All answers must use the correct number of significant figures, and must show units!

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

Euratom 7 th Framework Programme Collaborative Project Fast / Instant Release of Safety Relevant Radionuclides from Spent Nuclear Fuel

Chemical Decontamination and Fluid Handling Services

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

1.- L a m e j o r o p c ió n e s c l o na r e l d i s co ( s e e x p li c a r á d es p u é s ).

CLASS TEST GRADE 11. PHYSICAL SCIENCES: CHEMISTRY Test 6: Chemical change

Decommissioning situation of Nuclear Power Plant in Japan

Legislation in Ukraine about the Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident

Technical support for nuclear power operations

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION (EPFAQ) NEI REVISIONS 4 THROUGH 6; NUMARC/NESP 007

Derived Intervention Levels for Tritium Based on Food and Drug Administration Methodology Using ICRP 56 Dose Coefficients (U)

Assessment of environmental radiation monitoring data in Hungary following the Fukushima accident

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING THE CATTENOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Operating Performance: Accident Management: Severe Accident Management Programs for Nuclear Reactors REGDOC-2.3.2

WASTE STREAM 2Y51 Analytical Services Process Facilities - North Labs

How To Clean Up A Reactor Water Cleanup

Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility

A Review of Emerging Gamma Detector Technologies for Airborne. Radiation Monitoring

Radiological mapping and characterization at the Barsebäck nuclear power plant

Role and tasks of Arpa Piemonte in controlling and monitoring of ionizing and non ionizing radiation. G.. d Amored

Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi accident. Nuclear fission. Distribution of energy. Fission product distribution. Nuclear fuel

The objective of this chapter is to provide criteria with which to assess the safety of

Elements of the Russian Emergency Preparedness Program

Antoine Henri Becquerel was born in Paris on December 15, 1852

78776 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Notices

Maine Yankee INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL INSTALLATION (ISFSI) OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL CHANGE NO. 32. Approved: Approval Date: 0"/06

From Quantum to Matter 2006

NUCLEARINSTALLATIONSAFETYTRAININGSUPPORTGROUP DISCLAIMER

Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident

Azeri, Chirag & Gunashli Full Field Development Phase 3 Environmental & Socio-economic Impact Assessment. A10.1 Introduction...

ELECTRON CONFIGURATION (SHORT FORM) # of electrons in the subshell. valence electrons Valence electrons have the largest value for "n"!

Nuclear Power Plant Electrical Power Supply System Requirements

Significant incidents in nuclear fuel cycle

7.1 General Events resulting in pressure increase 5

Nuclear Energy: Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy of Ukraine - History

IMPLEMENTATION OF A MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR OPERATING ORGANIZATIONS OF RESEARCH REACTORS

ORTEC Radioactivity and its Measurements in Foodstuffs Where Does Radioactivity in Food Come From? Natural Radioactivity: Industrial Radioactivity:

Spent Fuel Project Office Interim Staff Guidance - 17 Interim Storage of Greater Than Class C Waste

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

Facility Hazard Categorization and Change Management Process

IAEA-TECDOC Waste inventory record keeping systems (WIRKS) for the management and disposal of radioactive waste

Technical Meeting on the Implications of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident on the Safety of Fuel Cycle Facilities. IAEA Headquarters Vienna, Austria

Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan

CROSS REFERENCE. Cross Reference Index Cast ID Number Connector ID Number 111 Engine ID Number Ford Motor Company 109

Objectives 404 CHAPTER 9 RADIATION

The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

Introductions: Dr. Stephen P. Schultz

BWR Description Jacopo Buongiorno Associate Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering

Position paper on the implications of deep sea disposal of radioctive waste

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to power reactors 17 May 2011

May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

This document is the property of and contains Proprietary Information owned by Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and/or its subcontractors and

1. In the general symbol cleus, which of the three letters. 2. What is the mass number of an alpha particle?

WASTE STREAM 2F35 Excellox-Type Transport Flasks and French-Design Dry Flasks

PERSONNEL MONITORING AND DOSIMETRY POLICIES

Accidents of loss of flow for the ETTR-2 reactor: deterministic analysis

RC-17. Alejandro V. Nader National Regulatory Authority Montevideo - Uruguay

U.S. EPA s Models for Establishing Cleanup Levels in Soil, Water, Buildings and Streets at Superfund Sites

The Selection of Alarm Levels for Personnel Exit Monitors

Response to NRC Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Fermi 2 License Renewal Application - Set 37

February 19, Senior Fellow, Nuclear Energy Systems & Services Division Power Systems Company

Preventing Overheated Boiler Incidents

L.S. de Carvalho, J. M de Oliveira Neto 1. INTRODUCTION IAEA-CN-164-5P01

IAEA-TECDOC-1344 Categorization of radioactive sources

Radiation Sciences Nuclear Medicine Technology Program Hot Lab Log Book (Material)

100% ionic compounds do not exist but predominantly ionic compounds are formed when metals combine with non-metals.

Published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) number 166 of July 10th 2009 [1]

About Pure Earth and the Toxic Site Identification Program

Section 4 RADIATION SAFETY RULES AND REGULATIONS

British Nuclear Group Reactor Sites Chemistry Issues NuSAC SCR Meeting - April 4 th 2006

RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS

SAFE MANAGEMENT OF SMOKE DETECTORS CONTAINING RADIOACTIVE SOURCES

UNESCO - EOLSS SAMPLE CHAPTER

GREATER-THAN-CLASS C LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND DOE GREATER-THAN-CLASS C-LIKE WASTE INVENTORY ESTIMATES

EPA Radionuclides Rule and the RadNet Program

Transcription:

IAEA-TECDOC-955 Generic assessment procedures for determining protective actions during a reactor accident INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

The IAEA does not normally maintain stocks of reports in this series However, microfiche copies of these reports can be obtained from INIS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse

The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Radiation Safety Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse

One FOREWORD

EDITORIAL NOTE In preparing this publication for press, staff of the IAEA have made up the pages from the original manuscripts). The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the governments of the nominating Member States or of the nominating organizations. Although great care

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...

Table Ol Assessment priorities... 17 Table Al Accident classification the operating, standby and hot shutdown mode... 23 Table

WORKSHEETS... 139 Worksheet

INTRODUCTION The aim of this publication is to provide practical guidance and tools for accident assessment that,

OBJECTIVES

STRUCTURE The manual is organized in sections based on proposed assessment organization and in the order that assessments most likely will be performed. Each section contains methods, that are standalone procedures. Sections start with

SECTION O ACCIDENT ASSESSMENT MANAGER PROCEDURES Caution: The procedures in this section must be revised to reflect local and plant conditions

Performed

Accident Assessment Procedure Ol Pg. 2 of 3 Accident Assessment Manager

TABLE

SECTION

Performed

Performed

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

TABLE Al ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION THE OPERATING, STAND-BY OR HOT SHUTDOWN MODE

TABLE Al ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION THE OPERATING, STAND-BY OR HOT SHUTDOWN MODE For the following accident entry conditions: Declare

TABLE Al ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION THE OPERATING, STAND-BY OR HOT SHUTDOWN MODE

TABLE

to do TABLE

TABLE

U) o TABLE Al ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION THE OPERATING, STAND-BY OR HOT SHUTDOWN MODE

TABLE A1 ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION THE OPERATING, STAND-BY OR HOT SHUTDOWN MODE

to TABLE A1 ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION THE OPERATING, STAND-BY OR HOT SHUTDOWN MODE For the following accident entry conditions; Unplanned increase in plant radiation levels Declare a General Emergency if: Multiple plant radiation monitors show an unplanned or unpredicted increase by a factor High ambient dose rates beyond the site boundary.

TABLE Al ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION THE OPERATING. STAND-BY OR HOT SHUTDOWN MODE

TABLE

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure Al Pg. 14 of 24 TABLE

TABLE

TABLE A2 ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION FOR COLD SHUTDOWN OR REFUELLING

TABLE

TABLE

P". o TABLE A2 ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATION FOR COLD SHUTDOWN OR REFUELLING For the following accident entry conditions: Confirmed

TABLE

K) TABLE

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure Al Pg. 22 of 24 FIGURE Al COOLING MARGIN - SATURATION CURVE Discussion A primary system temperature greater than

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure Al Pg. 23 of 24 FIGURE A2 INJECTION REQUIRED

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

Performed, by: Nuclear Condition Assessment Manager ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE A2

Performed

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

Performed by: Nuclear Condition Assessment Manager PROCEDURE A2b CORE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT BASED ON CONTAINMENT RADIATION LEVELS Pg.

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure Alb Pg. 2 of 9 3000 [MW(th)} where: damge X ṁonitor Normalized monitor reading [mgy/h] from table A4. Estimated monitor reading [msv/h] to be used in assessment of actual readmg Volume p plant SF

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A2b Pg. 3 of 9 FIGURE A3 LARGE PWR CONTAINMENT MONITOR It is assumed that the release from the core is uniformly mixed in the containment; the monitor

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A2b Pg. 6 of 9 FIGURE A6

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A2b Pg. 9 of 9 It FIGURE A9 WWER-213 CONTAINMENT MONITOR

Performed by: Nuclear Condition Assessment Manager PROCEDURE

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A2c Pg. 2 of 3 For other reactors with primary system coolant inventories considerably different from 2.5xl0

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A2cPg. 3 of 3 TABLE

Performed by: Nuclear Condition Assessment Manager PROCEDURE A2d SPENT FUEL DAMAGE ASSESSMENT Pg.

Performed by: Nudear Condition Assessment Manager PROCEDURE A3 ASSESSMENT OF RELEASE ROUTES AND CONDITIONS Pg. Iof4 Purpose:

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A3 Pg. 2 of 4 TABLE A7 RELEASE ROUTE EVALUATION GUIDE Possible Routes Release from the containment: Release out of primary system through the containment to the atmosphere. Indicators Core melts until core has been recovered with water

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A3 Pg. 3 of 4 TABLE

Nuclear Condition Assessment Procedure A3 Pg. 4 of 4 TABLE

SECTION

Performed by: Protective Action. Manager PROCEDURE

Protective Action Assessment Procedure Bl Pg. 2 of 9 Step 5 After the threat of a major release is over and the composition of the deposition has been fully characterized, request

Protective Action Assessment Procedure

Protective Action Assessment Procedure Bl Pg. 4 of 9 TABLE B1 PROTECTIVE ACTIONS BASED ON CLASSIFICATION Protective actions (a) Evacuate

Protective Action Assessment Procedure Bl Pg. 5 of 9 TABLE B2 PUBLIC PROTECTIVE ACTIONS BASED ON PROJECTIONS AND IN PLUME MEASUREMENTS Projections BASIS Ambient dose rate

-J TABLE

TABLE

OIL # Default value A-Protective action B-Defmition C-Summary

Protective Action Assessment TABLE

Caution: SECTION C RADIATION PROTECTION MANAGER PROCEDURES

Performed

Radiation Protection Procedure

SECTION D ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST PROCEDURES Caution: The procedures in this section must be revised to reflect local and plant conditions for which they will be applied. NEXT PAGE(S)

Performed by: Environmental Analyst PROCEDURE Dl ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Page 1 of 3 Purpose To manage environmental monitoring. Discussion The measurements are arranged by priorities the results are needed in case of an accident, so do not change the order. Input > Accident class from Worksheet

oo ON TABLE

TABLE

Caution: SECTION E PROJECTION ANALYST PROCEDURES

Performed

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure EO Pg. 2 of 2 Step 3 Ensure Worksheet

Performed by: Projection Analyst PROCEDURE El PROJECTED URGENT PROTECTIVE ACTION DISTANCES BASED ON PLANT CONDITIONS Pg.lofl Purpose To estimate urgent protective action distances based

Performed by: Projection Analyst PROCEDURE Ela RELEASE FROM THE CONTAINMENT Pg. 1 of 5 Purpose To estimate protective action distances for a release which passes through the primary system and through

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure Ela Pg. 3 of 5 FIGURE E2 Projected Urgent Protective Action Distances for RELEASE FROM

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure El a Pg. 4 of 5 FIGURE E3 Projected Urgent Protective Action Distances for RELEASE FROM

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure

Performed by: Projection Analyst PROCEDURE

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure Elb Pg. 2 of 3 FIGURE E5 Projected Urgent Protective Action Distances for CONTAINMENT BY-PASS UNDER DRY CONDITIONS

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure Elb Pg. 3 of 3 FIGURE E6 Projected Urgent Protective Action Distances

Performed

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure

Performed

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure

Performed by:. Projection Analyst PROCEDURE E2 PROJECTED URGENT PROTECTIVE ACTION DISTANCES BASED

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure E2 Pg. 2 of 2 FIGURE E10 Projected Urgent Protective Action Distances based

Performed

Projected Protective Action Distances Procedure

SECTION

Performed

Performed by: Sample Analyst PROCEDURE Fl REVISION OF PLUME EXPOSURE OILs AND EMERGENCY WORKER TURN BACK GUIDANCE

Sample Analysis Procedure

Sample Analysis Procedure Fl Pg. 3 of 5 Step 6 Recalculate

Sample Analysis frocedure Fl Pg. 4 of 5 TABLE F1 INHALATION DOSE RATE CONVERSION FACTORS Discussion:

Sample Analysis Procedure

Performed

Sample Analysis Procedure

Sample Analysis Procedure F2 Pg. 3 of 6 TABLE

Sample Analysis Procedure F2 Pg. 4 of 6 TABLE F5 DOSE AND DOSE RATE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR EXPOSURE TO GROUND CONTAMINATION Discussion: This contains dose conversion factors (CF) for the first, second month and 50 year periods of exposure to ground contamination. Decay, ingrowth and weathering have been considered. The

Sample Analysis Procedure F2 Pg. 5 of 6 Radionuclide Ru-106

Sample Analysis Procedure

Performed

Sample Analysis Procedure F3 Pg. 2 of 3 Step 1 Using Worksheet F3 recalculate OIL6 and OIL? for both 1-131 and Cs-137 for groups 1 and 2 for the

Sample Analysis Procedure

Performed by: Sample Analyst PROCEDURE

Sample Analysis TABLE

Sample Analysis Procedure

Sample Analysis Procedure F4 Pg. 4 of 8 TABLE F8 REDUCTION FACTORS FOR PROCESSING OR FILTERING for FOOD Discussion: Processing

Sample Analysis Procedure

Sample Analysis Procedure F4 Pg. 6 of 8 Element Caesium Food Meat Fish Mushrooms boiling bones frying wet salting dry salting pickling boiling frying cleaning Preparation Berries Strontium Spinach Cabbage Green beans Tomatoes Onions Potatoes Carrots Beets Cereals Rye Rice Milk

Sample Analysis Procedure

Sample Analysis Procedure F4 Pg. 8 of 8 TABLE F9 IAEA TOTAL EFFECTIVE DOSE GUIDANCE FOR EMERGENCY WORKERS TASKS Type

Performed by: Sample Analyst EVALUATION PROCEDURE F5

Sample Analysis Procedure

WORKSHEETS Caution: The worksheets hi this section must be revised to reflect local and plant conditions for which they will be applied. NEXT PAQE(S) I ( ft BLANK

Performed

Performed ;by; Itfudear CawMon Assessment Manager FLANT- ON1>I11 N ASSESSMENT No: Prepared

Performed by: Protective Action Manager WORKSHEET Bl EVACUATION, THYROID BLOCKING/ SHELTER

Performed by: Protective Action Manager WORKSHEET B2 FOOD EVALUATION AND RESTRICTION MAP No: Prepared by: (full name) Provide copies

Performed by: Environmental Analyst WORKSHEET Dl AMBIENT DOSE RATE AROUND THE PLANT No: Survey Team: (names) Provide copies to: L-l Radiation Protection Manager Date: I I Protective Action Manager D Projection Analyst Survey monitor: Sector Distance [km] Time Weather: Ambient Dose Rate [msv/h] Remark Open Window Close Window A B C D E F G H J K L M N P R S Record die highest ambient dose rate for the opened and closed probe window within each sector, the distance from the plant and the time measurement was taken. These measurements should be made within 1-2 km zone around

Performed by: Environmental Analyst WORKSHEET D2 NEAR-HELD AMBIENT DOSE RATE MAP [msv/h] No: Prepared

Performed

Performed

Prepared Performed by: Environmental Analyst WORKSHEET D5 NEAR-FIELD MARKER ISOTOPE DEPOSITION CONCENTRATION MAP No:

Performed

Performed

Performed by: Samp le Analyst RESULTS FROM WORKSHEET D8

Performed by: Projection Analyst Prepared WORKSHEET El PROJECTED PROTECTIVE ACTION DISTANCES No:

Performed by: WORKSHEET Sample Analyst

Performed by: Sample Analyst WORKSHEET

Performed

Performed by: Sample Analyst WORKSHEET

APPENDICES NEXT PAGE(S) left BLANK

Appendix I Assumptions Appendix

Appendii

Appendix I OEL2: Take thyroid blocking agent based

Appendix

Appendix I Assumptions where: Y r productivity; assume RF u,cow ff f m, OIL6 OIL7 GAL G ^g, j, core melt ^i, G, core melt

Appendix

Appendix I Assumptions Core

Appendix

Appendix I Assumptions TABLE IB: PWR Typical Normal Coolant Concentrations NndkJe H-3 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Kr-85 Kr-85m Kr-87 Kr-88 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-91 Y-91 Mo-99 Tc-99 Ru-103 Ru-106 Te-129m Te-131m Te-132 Sb-127 Sb-129 1-131 1-132 1-133 1-134 1-135 Xe-131m Xe-133 Xe-133m Xe-135 Xe-138 Cs-134 Cs-136 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Ce-144 Np-239 Source: ANSI84 Normal Coacentratioa [kbq/g] 3.70E+01 5.92E-02 1.70E-01 1.96E-02 1.59E+01 5.92E+00 5.55E-KX) 1.04E+01 5.18E-03 4.44E-04 3.55E-02 1.92E-04 2.37E-01 1.74E-01 2.78E-01 3.55E+00 7.03E-03 5.55E-02 6.29E-02 0.00 0.00 1.67E+00 7.77E+00 5.18E+00 1-26E+01 9.62E-HX) 2.70E+01 9.62E-K)! 2.59E-HK) 3.15E-H)! 4.44E+00 2.63E-01 3.22E-02 3.48E-01 4.81E-01 9.25E-01 1.48E-01 8.14E-02 169

Appendix I Assumptions TABLE 1C: BWR Typical Normal Coolant Concentrations Nndide H-3 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Kr-85 Kr-85m Kr-87 Kr-88 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-9I Y-91 Mo-99 Tc-99 Ru-103 Ru-106 Te-129m Te-131m Te-132 Sb-127 Sb-129 1-131 1-132 1-133 1-134 1-135 Xe-131m Xe-133 Xe-133m Xe-135 Xe-138 Cs-134 Cs-136 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Ce-I44 Np-239 Source: ANS184 Normal Coacoitratioa [IcBq/fe] 3.70B-01 2.59E-03 7.40E-03 1.48E-02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.70E-03 2.59E-04 1.48E-01 1.48E-03 7.40E-02 7.40E-02 7.40E-04 1.11E-04 1.48E-03 3.70E-03 3.70E-04 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 8.14E-02 8.14E-01 5.55E-01 I.59E+00 8. 14E-01 O.OOE-KK) O.OOE-KK) O.OOE-KK) O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.1 IE-03 7.40E-04 2.96E-03 1.48E-03 1.48E-02 1.11E-04 2.96E-01 170

Appendix I Assumptions Table ID: Fission Product Inventory (FPI)* Discussion: This lists

Appendix

Appendix I Table

Appendix I Assumptions TABLE IF: System Particulate/Aerosol Release Reduction Factors (RDF) Reduction Mechanism RDF Redaction Factor* assumed for in Section E for the following routes

Appendix

Appendix I TABLE

Appendix I Assumptions Dose Calculation Doses

Appendix

Appendii I Assumptions Procedures

Appendix H InterRAS Model Appendix n InterRAS MODEL (May, 1997 release) INDEX 1. Introduction 2. Running InterRAS 2.1. Getting Started 2.2. Capabilities 2.3. Getting Around The Program with a mouse 2.4. Getting Around without

Appendix II IruerRAS Model

Appendix

Appendix II InterRAS Model help windows

Appendix U InlerRAS Model

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix n InterRAS Model 2.5. Exiting InterRAS When

Appendix U InterRAS Model 3.1.2. Default Units

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix n InterRAS Model 3.2. FM-DOSE Modifications The dose calculations have

Appendix II InterRAS Model 4. SETTING RUNTIME OPTIONS 4.1. Configuration File InterRAS uses a configuration file named RASCAL21.CFG to control where files are stored on

Appendix II InterRAS Model Describe

Appendix II InterRAS Model Problem:

Appendix

Appendix II InlerRAS Model 6. PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES USED The following software packages and compilers were used in the creation of InterRAS Version 1.1: Microsoft

Appendix II InterRAS Model Where: a = result type number (reference b = c = d = e =

Appendix D InterRAS Model The format of the file is: result type (integer*2) engineering units (character*3) Cartesian grid array (31,31) (real*4) polar grid array (36,3) (real*4) 6.2.2. InterRAS Batch File InterRAS is composed of a number of standalone executable files. The running of theses files in

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix II InterRAS Model 6.2.7. R2NUC.DAT File Format

Appendix II InterRAS Model 6.2.9. DECAY.DAT File Format The ASCE file DECAY.DAT defines the decay matrices of each radionuclide used in the DECAY calculator. A fragment of the file is shown below for illustration. Ti-44 Sc-44-4.64E-10 O.OOE+00 4.90E-05-4.90E-05 <- a <-b <- c The file consists of the following lines: a

Appendix II InterRAS Model where:

Appendix

Appendix II InterRAS Model Messages

Appendix

Appendix D InterRAS Model Do not edit the RASCAL21.CFG file directly to add a printer. For InterRAS to recognize and use a printer driver it must be properly defined in the RCFG.DAT file. This means that the file must contain

Appendix

Appendix HI Dose Calculation Appendix

Appendix HI Dose Calculation SECTION A CALCULATE URGENT PHASE DOSE (Total Effective Dose,

Appendix in Dose Calculation where: R 2 Thyroid dose rate

Appendix HI Dose Calculation SECTION

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix in Table ffla: Ingestion dose conversion factors (e(g)) Dose Calculation Nndide H-3 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Rb-87 Rb-88 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-91 Y-90 Y-91 Y-91m Zr-95 Nb-95 Mo-99 Tc-99 Tc-99m Ru-103 Ru-106 Rh-106 Sb-127 Sb-129 Te-127 Te-127m Te-129 Te-129m Te-131 Te-131m Te-132 1-131 1-132 1-133 1-134 1-135 Cs-134 Cs-135 Cs-136 Cs-137 Cs-138 Ba-140 Infant Age 1-2 a [msv/kbq] 120E-04 3.10E-03 4.40E-03 2.70E-02 l.ooe-02 6.20E-04 1.80E-02 7.30E-02 4.00E-03 2.00E-02 1.80E-02 6.00E-05 5.60E-03 320E-03 3.50E-03 4.80E-03 1.30E-04 4.60E-03 4.90E-02 9.70E-04 1.20E-02 2.90E-03 1.20E-03 1.80E-02 4.40E-04 2.40E-02 6.60E-04 1.40E-02 3.00E-02 1.80E-01 2.40E-03 4.40E-02 7.50E-04 8.90E-03 1.60E-02 2.30E-03 9.50E-03 1.20E-02 5.90E-04 1.80E-02 Child Ag*7-12a [msv/kbq] 5.70E-05 1.30E-03 1.70E-03 1.10E-02 3.10E-03 1.70E-04 5.80E-03 6.00E-02 1.20E-03 5.90E-03 520E-03 2.10E-05 1.90E-03 1.10E-03 1.10E-03 1.30E-03 4.30E-05 1.50E-03 1.50E-02 3.30E-04 3.60E-03 8.80E-04 3.60E-04 5.20E-03 1.20E-04 6.60E-03 1.90E-04 4.30E-03 8.30E-03 5.20E-02 6J20E-04 1.10E-02 2.10E-04 2.20E-03 1.40E-02 1.70E-03 4.40E-03 l.ooe-02 1.70E-04 5.80E-03 Adult Age>17a (msv/kbq] 4.20E-05 7.10E-04 7.40E-04 3.40E-03 1.50E-03 9.00E-05 2.60E-03 2.80E-02 6.50E-04 2.70E-03 2.40E-03 120E-05 9.50E-04 5.90E-04 6.00E-04 6.40E-04 220E-05 7.30E-04 7.00E-03 1.60E-04 1.70E-03 420E-04 1.70E-04 2.30E-03 6.30E-05 3.00E-03 8.70E-05 1.90E-03 3.80E-03 220E-02 2.90E-04 4.30E-03 1.10E-04 9.30E-04 1.90E-02 2.00E-03 3.10E-03 1.30E-02 9.20E-05 2.60E-03 217

Appendix En Dose Calculation Nudide Infant Age La-140 Ce-141 Ce-144 Pr-144 Th-231 Np-239 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-240 Pu-241 Pu-242 Am241

Appendix IV Decay Data Appendix IV RADIOACTIVE HALF-LIVES, DECAY DATA

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix IV Decay Data Sb-127 (3.85

Appendix IV Decay Data 1-135 (6.61

Appendix

SYMBOLS Only the symbols that are used in more than one formula or procedure are shown Symbol Br c^ ^before c^ *- table c. c fc, Q, C G Unit m 3 /h kbq/kg or kbq/1 kbq/kg or kbq/1 kbq/g kbq/g kbq/m 3 kfiq/rn 2 kbq/kg or kbq/1 kbq/kg Description Breathing rate Concentration c fj kbq/m 2 CF, (msv/h)/(kbq/m 3 ) CF 2l (msv/h)/(kbq/m 3 ) CF 3l (msv/h)/(kbq/m 2 ) CF 4, (msv)/(kbq/m 2 ) CF 5l DI R mg msv/kbq d msv ET 7 msv msv E, ns msv/h ^ inh msv/h EWG msv

Symbol 4 GAL G GIL e Unit (kbq/l)/(kbq/day) kbq/kg msv Description Transfer factor for isotope / from ingestion to cow's milk Food, water or milk concentration Generic Action Level for group G above which food restriction should be considered ( See Table F6 for IAEA recommendations) Generic intervention level GIL^ msv GIL r H.,o H., g msv msv msv H thy #» *; *: T* OIL! msv msv/h msv/h msv/h msv/h msv/h OIL2 msv/h OILS msv/h OIL4 msv/h OILS uswh OIL6 kbq/m 2

Symbol OIL? Unit kbq/m 2 Description Deposition levels OILS kbq/kg OIL9 kbq/kg pa plant r RF MW(th) R, R, SF T e h T d ^ T, u fi days hours, days years kg/d u«, w x. x r kg/d km km Xthy km Y kg/m 2

REFERENCES ANSI79 American National Standard ANSI84 ASME93 DOE84 DOE95 EGG75 EPA70 EPA88 EPA92 EPA93 EPA94 FEMA87 IAEA74

IAEA 86 Derived Intervention Levels IAEA94 IAEA94a IAEA96 1AEA97 ICRP75

NRC83a NRC83b A. L. Camp, et al., Light Water Reactor Hydrogen Manual, NUREG/CR- 2726 (SAND82-1137, R3), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.. June 1983. J.

GLOSSARY Definitions of terms and acronyms used in the document These definitions are only assist the user of this document. AC Alternating current Active fuel

Ambient dose rate Ambient Dose Equivalent, H*(d)

BWR See: Boiling water reactor By-pass Route that allows fission products released from a reactor core to enter the environment without passing through the containment or accident localization volume. Catastrophic failure Failure of the reactor containment in a manner that releases most of the fission products in the containment into the environment in a short time. Centerline (plume) An imaginary line drawn in the middle of the plume along its downwind travel direction with a straight-line Gaussian approximation model. The plume concentrations and deposition are assumed to be the highest along the centerline. CET See: Core exit thermocouple Charging Pump A pump used during normal operation to maintain primary system water level. Also referred to as a make-up pump or normal injection pump. This pump may also used as part of the ECCS system. Child A 10 year old. Chronic dose Radiation dose received over

generator. In a boiling water reactor, it returns to the reactor vessel. The heat removed from the system

Curie (Ci)

Emergency action level (EAL) A pre-determined site specific observable threshold at which places a plant and off-site response organizations

Fuel rod (fuel pin) A long, slender tube that holds fissionable material (fuel) for nuclear reactor use. Fuel rods are assembled into bundles called fuel elements

Half-life, biological

Intervention level The level of avertable dose at which a specific protective action or remedial action is taken in an emergency exposure situation or a chronic exposure situation. Isotopes Nuclides

Normal coolant release

Pressurizer A tank

Re-entry Temporary entry into

Severe core damage Damage

Spiked coolant release The release of 100 times the non-noble gas fission products found in the coolant. Spiked coolant Rapid increase in non-noble gas fission products in the reactor coolant. This can occur following rapid shutdown

Tissue or organ Gonads Bone marrow (red) Colon (a) Lung Stomach Bladder Breast Liver Oesophagus Thyroid Skin Bone surface Remainder (b) Tissue weighting factor W T 0.20 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.05

Turn back guidance An integrated dose reading

CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW I. CONSULTANTS MEETING Vienna 06-10 November, 1995 Asculai, E. Israel Atomic Energy Commission, Tel-Aviv, Israel McKenna,

Trefethen,

CORRECTIONS TO REPORT Vienna 12-16 August, 1996 McKenna, T. (Scientific Secretary) Martincic, R. Winkler, G. Division of Radiation and Waste Safety, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia Atom Institute of the Austrian Universities, Vienna, Austria QUALITY CHECK AND REVISIONS Vienna 21-31 October, 1996 McKenna,

McKenna, V. CONSULTANT MEETING Vienna 20-24 January, 1997

AC INDEX

conversion factors for ingestion... 217 for ambient dose rate from deposition... 122, 178 for future maximum cow milk isotope concentration... 129 for long term dose from deposition... 122, 178 from inhalation...

emergency

marker isotope 125,136 maximum cow milk isotope concentration 128 milk 211 monitor

radiation protection 81 Radiation Protection Manager