COSMOS. Urban Strong-Motion Reference Station Guidelines

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION City & County of San Francisco 1660 Mission Street, San Francisco, California

Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD)

SMIP02 Seminar Proceedings

AFAD DEPREM DAİRESİ BAŞKANLIĞI TÜRKİYE KUVVETLİ YER HAREKETİ ve ÖN HASAR TAHMİN SİSTEMLERİ ÇALIŞMA GRUBU. (Rapid Estimation Damage)

ISTANBUL EARTHQUAKE RAPID RESPONSE AND THE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM

The earthquake source

Instrument Testing and Evaluation for the Taiwan Strong-Motion Instrumentation Program

Design of Strong-motion Monitoring System for Dam-reservoir D s e i s gn of Stro r ng-mo m tion Monito t ri r ng Syst s em

Locating the Epicenter and Determining the Magnitude of an Earthquake

PROHITECH WP3 (Leader A. IBEN BRAHIM) A short Note on the Seismic Hazard in Israel

SECTION 8 Industrial Facilities Field Investigation

Seismic Risk Assessment Procedures for a System consisting of Distributed Facilities -Part three- Insurance Portfolio Analysis

ABSG Consulting, Tokyo, Japan 2. Professor, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan 3

Design Example 1 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters 11.4

Sismalog S t a n d - a l o n e S e i s m o g r a p h

Date, Time and Place: Presented by: Presented to: 22 August 2013, 0900 hrs, Pier 1 The Embarcadero, San Francisco

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

Seismic Risk Evaluation of a Building Stock and Retrofit Prioritization

Presentations. Session 1. Slide 1. Earthquake Risk Reduction. 1- Concepts & Terminology

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Protecting data centers from seismic activity Understanding enclosure standards is critical to protecting equipment

EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS

Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES

Earthquake Resistant Design and Risk Reduction. 2nd Edition

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT BOLINAS MARINE STATION - BOLINAS, CALIFORNIA

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

NI USB-5681 RF Power Meter Specifications

Unit 4 Lesson 6 Measuring Earthquake Waves. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Application Note Noise Frequently Asked Questions

RF Measurements Using a Modular Digitizer

Applying GIS in seismic hazard assessment and data integration for disaster management

GROUND RESPONSE OF KATHMANDU VALLEY ON THE BASIS OF MICROTREMORS

A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE WAVES GENERATED

EARTHQUAKES. Compressional Tensional Slip-strike

Earthquakes and Data Centers

SEISMIC TESTING OF NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESCRIBED RESPONSE SPECTRUM

DS 600. A contact free flux gate based current measurement sensor 600A rms

Technical Datasheet Scalar Network Analyzer Model MHz to 40 GHz

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Name: Date: Class: Finding Epicenters and Measuring Magnitudes Worksheet

Strategic Plan:

Robot Perception Continued

Five reasons buildings fail in an earthquake and how to avoid them

CEE Earthquake Resistant Design. General Information

Overview. NRC Regulations for Seismic. Applied to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. NRC History. How we Regulate

9000 Series Accelerometers Specifications

SEISMIC EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

CBS RECORDS PROFESSIONAL SERIES CBS RECORDS CD-1 STANDARD TEST DISC

PeakVue Analysis for Antifriction Bearing Fault Detection

ENGINEERING-BASED EARTHQUAKE RISK MANAGEMENT

Measurement of RF Emissions from a Final Coat Electronics Corrosion Module

Understanding Dynamic Range in Acceleration Measurement Systems. February 2013 By: Bruce Lent

SMIP2000 Seminar Proceedings COSMOS VIRTUAL STRONG MOTION DATA CENTER. Ralph Archuleta

ARROWHEAD GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY RESIDENTIAL EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE PROGRAM UNDERWRITING GUIDELINES & RATE MANUAL

METHOD STATEMENT HIGH STRIAN DYNAMIC TESTING OF PILE. Prepared by

Mitigation Works. 0 Earthquakes move mountains. But so do imagination and ingenuity when matched with implementation.

Certification: Building Plans Examiner. Exam ID: B3

ORDINANCE NO

Vibration Isolation in Data Centers

Elevating Your House. Introduction CHAPTER 5

Seismic Isolated Hospital Design Practice in Turkey: Erzurum Medical Campus

A.1 Sensor Calibration Considerations

DDX 7000 & Digital Partial Discharge Detectors FEATURES APPLICATIONS

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

NORSAR/International Center of Geohazards (ICG) Kjeller, Norway. International Conference on Open Risk Analysis Cambridge, UK June 2009

PROJECT SUMMARY. Scope of work details: (If phased construction, please see plan submittal guidelines.)

CC Family of Data Collectors

Measures to increase accuracy and precision of software-based noise prediction

RESIDENTIAL WOOD DECKS

Difference in levels of groundborne noise and vibrations between the T-1300 and MX-3000 metro trains in Oslo

Earthquake damage in wastewater systems and postearthquake repair methods; limitation and practice

Airborne Sound Insulation

Electrical. This section applies to the design and installation of building power distribution systems.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

RAILROAD DAMAGE FROM THE OCTOBER 16, 1999 HECTOR MINE EARTHQUAKE

DRS-6/1 Doppler Radar Sensor

3. Observed Damage in Railway Viaducts

How do scientists measure earthquakes?

Uncovered Decks & Porches

PRODUCT DATASHEET. J1939 Vehicle Inertia Monitor. Advanced Vehicle Inertial Measurement and Vibration Monitoring Device. fleet-genius.

Development Services City of Lawrence, KS

Key Considerations for Selecting Server Cabinets for Seismic Areas

e s p i o n s.com. V680 GPS Watch User s Manual

Expected Performance Rating System

Ground-borne Vibrations and Ground Settlements Arising from Pile Driving and Similar Operations

PART 1 - INTRODUCTION...

SCHATZ - TEST Tool testing systems. SCHATZ -certest-w. Dynamic testing of torque tools

ISTANBUL EARTHQUAKE RISK AND MITIGATION STUDIES

The Universal DAQ Device. Connect and measure immediately!

AT&T Internet Data Center Site Specification Chicago Area (Lisle, IL)

Transcription:

Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observations Systems COSMOS Urban Strong-Motion Reference Station Guidelines Goals, Criteria and Specifications for Urban Strong-Motion Reference Stations by Strong-Motion Program Board of COSMOS 1. Goals The goals of urban strong-motion reference stations are to provide: 1.1 Reliable information for accurate, effective characterization of the shaking by ShakeMap and other rapid post-earthquake tools; 1.2 Recorded motion for post-earthquake performance analysis of structures; 1.3 Empirical basis for long-term improvements in the seismic provisions of building codes and construction guidelines; and 1.4 Seismological data, complementing data from non-urban stations, to improve the under-standing of earthquake generation and seismic wave propagation in areas with inadequate measurements. 2. Criteria As a general optimization strategy, one or a combination of the following measures should be used to optimize the locations of instruments: 2.1 Probability of Shaking: highest likelihood of shaking (percentage in N years), split into two groupings: 2.1.1 Probability of Short-Period Shaking: addressing the many short-period structures that occur widely across the country. 2.1.2 Probability of Long-Period Shaking: addressing the long-period hazard to tall, high-rise buildings that occur in major cities at specific locations in the country. 1

2.2 Probability of Property Damage: Areas without the highest probability to shaking, but elevated probability of damage because of serious consequences, if an event were to occur. 2.3 Probability of Life and Indirect Loss: Areas with elevated probability of loss, even though they are not areas of highest shaking or damage probability, because of their increased likelihood for casualties, death, or human suffering due to the fragility of the infrastructure or wide-spread impact of failure (utilities, transportation, etc.). 2.4 Probability of Learning: Areas of major uncertainty in knowledge about earthquake generation or seismic wave propagation and the attenuation of peak ground motion and spectral levels in order to improve the understanding of the hazard in those areas. 2.5 Value in Emergency Response: Location and areas of strategic, optimal value for providing effective, rapid shaking information for emergency response. In general the probabilistic maps should serve as a basis for planning, augmented by HAZUS maps of damage and loss which incorporate shaking probabilities, the infrastructure and structure inventory and its fragility, and the impacts of loss of function. 3. Instrument Specifications 3.1 Overall recording range: Accelerograph system (sensor plus recorder) shall be able to record an acceleration range of +/-2g Full Scale, and meet industryaccepted accelerograph specifications. 3.2 Recorder dynamic range: New instrumentation shall have 18-bit or greater resolution (114 db), and fixed gain (no gain ranging), so that the recorder s resolution (LSB) is 0.015 mg (2g/2 17 ). 3.3 Noise floor: The noise level of the accelerometer plus recorder system shall be less than 0.02 mg rms in the frequency range of 0-40 Hz. 3.4 Communication: The instrument shall either have reliable, continuous telemetry or automated dial-out communication upon triggering, using phone lines. A certain portion of the stations will require real time communication in order to provide the most rapid preliminary ShakeMap. Regardless of communication mode, the instrument shall provide on-site recording for 2 hours or more of strong motion recording. The instrument shall also communicate, via real time or dial-out communication, when it encounters state-of-health problems (e.g., low battery, loss of AC, intrusion, etc). 3.5 Timing accuracy: Within 1/10th of a sampling interval of absolute time (UTC). 2

3.6 Sample rate: 200 samples per second (5 ms sampling interval). Adequate antialias filtering shall be included (filter corner at 80% of the Nyquist frequency, and down by 100 db at the Nyquist). 3.7 Triggering: Nominal trigger level of 1-5 mg (0.1-0.5%g) acceleration, within a pass band of 0.1 to 12 Hz; actual trigger level to be established by noise levels at the site. (A successful trigger level will cause occasional, but not frequent, triggering, thus providing ongoing knowledge of instrument performance between significant recordings). Once triggered, the recorder shall stay triggered for at least 30 seconds after the last occurrence of acceleration over 5 mg. Recorders at sites likely to experience significant basin effects or other longduration motion effects should stay triggered for at least 60 seconds after the last 5 mg acceleration. 3.8 Pre-event memory: Recorder shall include pre-event memory of 30 seconds or greater and must record, on-site, 2 hours or more of ground motion data. 3.9 Data Format: Recorder may produce event files in a format native to the instrument or manufacturer. However, the manufacturer shall provide conversion utilities to convert the native files to COSMOS and SEED formats. The native files shall include a cyclic redundancy check or other method to verify recorded file integrity. 3.10 Calibration: Instrument shall accommodate and read bi-directional tilt tests to allow calibration of the sensitivity constants of the sensors. 3.11 Pre-Procurement and Post-Deliver Acceptance Testing: Prior to purchase, candidate instruments must be tested to verify that they meet specifications. After purchase, all instruments must be tested, and non-performing instruments repaired by the manufacturer. 3.12 Data Dissemination: Data should be disseminated via a central site with convenient access to the user community. 3.13 Maintenance Program: Adequate maintenance program is essential to the success of an advance seismic system. 4. Siting Specifications In general, urban strong-motion reference instruments should be located in small housings, on grade, and not at subsurface locations or in large buildings, so that the motion recorded corresponds to that on the ground in the surrounding area. 4.1 Location Strategy: Urban strong-motion reference stations should be located to record representative ground motion in the vicinity of significant business districts or groups of structures where possible. Locations should be chosen 3

with site geology representative of the area and preferably within 1 km of a significant business district or structure grouping. Additional stations may be required in areas with unique geologies or expected to experience altered shaking due to other factors (e.g., topography, distance to fault, soil-structure interaction). 4.2 Station Housing: Small building, without significant basement; 1-2 story light structure, wood frame preferable but reinforced masonry acceptable; building generally less than ~ 4000 sq.ft in plan. 4.3 Station Housing Foundation: Concrete pad (6 in. or less), on grade, without piles or piers. If a special, light instrument hut is used, the pad should be approximately 4 ft square, with 6 in. x 18 in. piers to ensure effective coupling, especially in soft soils. 4.4 Nearby Structures: Stations should be sited away from structures likely to cause significant soil-structure interaction effects that may be recorded in the data. A distance of at least one major structure dimension away from all large/ massive structures in the vicinity should be maintained where possible. 4.5 Site Conditions: Stations should be sited to avoid highly localized characteristics of the geology or nearby topography unless special documentation is performed. 4.6 Site Geology Documentation: Site geology at stations should be characterized through on-site geologic inspection or special investigations. 5. Installation Specifications 5.1 Orientation of Recorder: Instrument to be oriented with connector, or other fundamental element, oriented in a cardinal direction, preferably true North. Orientation to be well documented (photographically) and controlled by an effective process making very unlikely, or impossible, mistaken component orientations after an important earthquake. Triaxial acceleration sensors to be fastened securely with fixed, accurate orientation relative to the sensor housing enclosure. Sensors to be no more than 3 degrees out of othogonality 5.2 Orientation of Sensors: Sensors, if not mounted within the recorder, should be mounted orthogonally, within 2 degrees, and oriented with the housing connector of other reference element oriented in a cardinal direction, preferably true North, with orientation well documented and controlled, as for the recorder. 5.3 Station Location Accuracy: Accuracy of one ten-thousandth of a degree in latitude and longitude, with documentation (WGS884 standard) is recommended. 4

5.4 Anchoring of sensors, recorder and auxiliary components to pad: All elements to be bolted securely, with concrete anchors that remain tight over time. 5.5 Autonomy: Station shall include adequate backup batteries to operate for 4 days without power in case of loss of AC power. The power connection shall be hardwired or otherwise securely connected to the power source. Adopted after revision at the meeting of the COSMOS Strong Motion Programs Board on January 19, 2000, with participants N. Abrahamson, J. Anderson, R. Archuleta, B. Bolt, R. Borcherdt, C. Stepp, and A. Shakal (Chair), with additional input by M. Huang, W. Joyner, C. Kircher, and W.H.K. Lee. Earlier versions adopted by the TriNet Technical Advisory Committee (C. Poland, Chair), the TriNet Steering Committee (J. Davis, Chair), and the California Strong Motion Instrumentation Advisory Committee (B. Bolt, Chair). 5