BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION

Similar documents
Beam Deflections: 4th Order Method and Additional Topics

BEAMS: SHEAR AND MOMENT DIAGRAMS (GRAPHICAL)

Teaching Deflections of Beams: Advantages of Method of Model Formulas versus Method of Integration

Rigid and Braced Frames

Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments

Chapter 5: Indeterminate Structures Slope-Deflection Method

Shear and Moment Diagrams. Shear and Moment Diagrams. Shear and Moment Diagrams. Shear and Moment Diagrams. Shear and Moment Diagrams

Shear Forces and Bending Moments

Beam Deflections: Second-Order Method

Module 2. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Matrix Force Method. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Statics of Structural Supports

CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES INTRODUCTION

Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures

Deflections. Question: What are Structural Deflections?

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING

Introduction to Plates

2. Axial Force, Shear Force, Torque and Bending Moment Diagrams

HØGSKOLEN I GJØVIK Avdeling for teknologi, økonomi og ledelse. Løsningsforslag for kontinuasjonseksamen i Mekanikk 4/1-10

Recitation #5. Understanding Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagrams

Introduction to Mechanical Behavior of Biological Materials

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

Mechanics of Materials. Chapter 4 Shear and Moment In Beams

COMPLEX STRESS TUTORIAL 3 COMPLEX STRESS AND STRAIN

8.2 Elastic Strain Energy

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Chapter 8. Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagrams for Uniformly Distributed Loads.

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

The Basics of FEA Procedure

SOLUTION 6 6. Determine the force in each member of the truss, and state if the members are in tension or compression.

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

STRESS AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF LINEAR ELASTIC BARS IN TENSION

Bending Stress in Beams

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Section 7.2 Linear Programming: The Graphical Method

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

The elements used in commercial codes can be classified in two basic categories:

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

Finite Element Formulation for Beams - Handout 2 -

EQUILIBRIUM STRESS SYSTEMS

Plane Stress Transformations

Problem 1: Computation of Reactions. Problem 2: Computation of Reactions. Problem 3: Computation of Reactions

ENGINEERING MECHANICS STATIC

Finite Element Simulation of Simple Bending Problem and Code Development in C++

MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab. Chapter 9: Force, Torque and Strain Measurements

New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS: T-BEAMS AND DOUBLY REINFORCED BEAMS

Structural Analysis - II Prof. P. Banerjee Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 02

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics)

Mathematics Placement Packet Colorado College Department of Mathematics and Computer Science

SECTION 7-4 Algebraic Vectors

PROPERTIES OF ELLIPTIC CURVES AND THEIR USE IN FACTORING LARGE NUMBERS

Plane Stress Transformations

STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE COLUMNS-I

INVESTIGATIONS AND FUNCTIONS Example 1

Solving Systems of Linear Equations With Row Reductions to Echelon Form On Augmented Matrices. Paul A. Trogdon Cary High School Cary, North Carolina

Shear Force and Moment Diagrams

Solid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

CHAPTER 3 SHEARING FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAMS. Summary

Qualitative Influence Lines. Qualitative Influence Lines. Qualitative Influence Lines. Qualitative Influence Lines. Qualitative Influence Lines

15.1. Exact Differential Equations. Exact First-Order Equations. Exact Differential Equations Integrating Factors

Kirchhoff Plates: BCs and Variational Forms

Chapter 7 Structural design

Course in. Nonlinear FEM

CRITERIUM FOR FUNCTION DEFININING OF FINAL TIME SHARING OF THE BASIC CLARK S FLOW PRECEDENCE DIAGRAMMING (PDM) STRUCTURE

METHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT UNIFORM STRESSES DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FOUNDATION

The Big Picture. Correlation. Scatter Plots. Data

CHAPTER 3. INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS II (A60131)

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

9 Stresses: Beams in Bending

6. The given function is only drawn for x > 0. Complete the function for x < 0 with the following conditions:

Section 11.4: Equations of Lines and Planes

p atmospheric Statics : Pressure Hydrostatic Pressure: linear change in pressure with depth Measure depth, h, from free surface Pressure Head p gh

Modeling Beams on Elastic Foundations Using Plate Elements in Finite Element Method

Vectors Math 122 Calculus III D Joyce, Fall 2012

BEAMS: SHEAR FLOW, THIN WALLED MEMBERS

Chapter 6 Quadratic Functions

SHAFTS: TORSION LOADING AND DEFORMATION

When I was 3.1 POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS

CLASSIFICATION BOUNDARIES FOR STIFFNESS OF BEAM-TO- COLUMN JOINTS AND COLUMN BASES

Chapter 8. Lines and Planes. By the end of this chapter, you will

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE. Introduction REINFORCED CONCRETE CHAPTER SPRING Reinforced Concrete Design. Fifth Edition. By Dr. Ibrahim.

Structural Design Calculation For Pergola

Linear Equations in Linear Algebra

M PROOF OF THE DIVERGENCE THEOREM AND STOKES THEOREM

F. P. Beer et al., Meccanica dei solidi, Elementi di scienza delle costruzioni, 5e - isbn , 2014 McGraw-Hill Education (Italy) srl

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 3 LOADED COMPONENTS

STATICS. Introduction VECTOR MECHANICS FOR ENGINEERS: Eighth Edition CHAPTER. Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr.

CIVL 7/8117 Chapter 3a - Development of Truss Equations 1/80

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.

Finite Element Formulation for Plates - Handout 3 -

Integrating algebraic fractions

5.2 Inverse Functions

3D analysis of RC frames using effective-stiffness models

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

7.7 Solving Rational Equations

Use of Computers in Mechanics Education at Ohio State University*

Transcription:

ETURE EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION Third Edition. J. lark School of Engineering epartment of ivil and Environmental Engineering 19 hapter 9.7 9.8 b r. Ibrahim. ssakkaf SPRING 00 ENES 0 Mechanics of Materials epartment of ivil and Environmental Engineering Universit of Marland, ollege Park ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 1 Method of Superposition When a beam is subjected to several loads (see Fig. 18) at various positions along the beam, the problem of determining the slope and the deflection usuall becomes quite involved and tedious. This is true regardless of the method used. Hoever, man comple loading conditions are merel combinations of

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. Method of Superposition relativel simple loading conditions P 1 P a b Figure 18 (a) (b) ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. Method of Superposition ssumptions: The beam behaves elasticall for the combined loading. The beam also behaves elasticall for the each of the individual loads. Small deflection theor.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 4 Method of Superposition If it is assumed that the beam behaves elasticall for the combined loading, as ell as for the individual loads, the resulting final deflection of the loaded beam is simpl the sum of the deflections caused b each of the individual loads. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 5 Method of Superposition This sum ma be an algebraic one (Figure 19) or it might be a vector sum as shon in Figure 0, the tpe depending on hether or not the individual deflection lie in the same plane. The superposition method can illustrated b various practical eamples.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 6 Method of Superposition P P 1 Figure 19 a + P P P u b + + t ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 7 Method of Superposition Principle of Superposition: eformations of beams subjected to combinations of loadings ma be obtained as the linear combination of the deformations from the individual loadings Procedure is facilitated b tables of solutions for common tpes of loadings and supports.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 8 Method of Superposition Figure 0 P δ δ + δ δ z δ z z ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 9 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition Figure 1 onsider the beam shon in Fig. 1, ith a fleural rigidit of EI 100 MN m. m 150 kn 8 m 0 kn/m

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 10 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition If e are interested on finding the slope and the deflection, sa of point, then e can use the superposition method to do that as illustrated in the folloing slides. First e find the slope and deflection due the effect of each load, i.e.,, P, etc. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 11 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition The resulting final slope and deflection of point of the loaded beam is simpl the sum of the slopes and deflections caused b each of the individual loads as shon in Figure. We need to find both the slope and deflection caused b the concentrated load (10 kn) and distributed load (0 kn/m)

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 1 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition 150 kn m 0 kn/m 150 kn m + 8 m 8 m 8 m 0 kn/m Figure. Original oading is roken into To Individual oads ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 1 150 kn m Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition150 kn 8 m δ 0 kn/m m 8 m P + δ m 8 m 0 kn/m δ δ δ δ due to P + due to Figure. Original eflection is roken into To Individual eflections

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 14 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition Slope and eflection caused b P either the direct integration or the singularit functions method, it can be seen that the slope and deflection (due to P) of point of this particular loaded beam are given, respectivel, as P P ( θ ) and ( ) P P EI 56EI ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 15 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition Slope and eflection caused b P Therefore, P P EI ( θ ) P ( ) ( 150 10 )() 8 P 56EI 150 10 (8) 0.00 rad 6 (100 10 ) 0.009 m 6 56(100 10 ) (5a) (5b)

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 16 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition Slope and eflection caused b either the direct integration or the singularit functions method, it can be seen that the slope and deflection (due to ) of point of this particular loaded beam are given, respectivel, as ( θ ) ( 4 + 6 ) (6a) P 4EI 4 ( ) ( + ) (6b) P 4EI ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 17 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition Slope and eflection caused b With 0 kn/m, m, and 8 m, thus ( ) ( 4 + 6 ) θ P 4EI 4 ( ) ( + ) P 4EI 0 10 4 100 ( ) ( 56 ) 6 10 0 10 4 100 0.009 rad ( ) ( 91) 10 0.0076 m 6

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 18 Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition θ ombining the slopes and deflections produced b the concentrated (P) and distributed () loads, the results are ( θ ) + ( θ ) 0.00 0.009 0.0059 rad ( ) + ( ) 0.009 0.0076 0.0166 m 16.6 mm P P ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 19 150 kn m Illustrative Eample for the Use of Superposition 150 kn 0 kn/m m m 8 m 8 m δ ( ) P + θ ( ) P 0 kn/m 8 m δ δ ( ) θ θ ( θ ) p + ( θ ) and ( ) p + ( ) Figure 4. Total Slope and eflection of Point ( θ )

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 0 General Procedure of Superposition It is evident from the last results that the slope or deflection of a beam is the sum of the slopes or deflections produced b the individual loads. Once the slopes or deflections produced b a fe tpical individual loads have been determined b one of the methods alread ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 1 General Procedure of Superposition Presented, the superposition method provides a means of quickl solving a ide range of more complicated problems b various combinations of knon results. s more data become available, et a ider range of problems can be solved b the method of superposition.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. Slope and eflection Tables To facilitate the task of practicing engineers, most structural and mechanical handbooks include tables giving the deflections and slopes of beams for various loadings and tpes of support. Such a table can be found in the tetbook (Table 19) and provided herein in the net fe viegraphs (Table 1 and ). ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. Slopes and eflection Tables Table 1a

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 4 Slopes and eflection Tables Table 1b ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 5 Slopes and eflection Tables Table 1c

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 6 Slopes and eflection Tables Table 1d ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 7 Slopes and eflection Tables Table a (eer and Johnston 199)

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 8 Slopes and eflection Tables Table b (eer and Johnston 199) ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 9 Slopes and eflection Tables (eer and Johnston 199) Table c

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 0 Use of Slopes and eflection Tables Notice that the slope and deflection of the beam of Figures 1 and 4 (repeated here) of the illustrative eample could have been determined from the table (Table 1) Figure 1 m 150 kn 0 kn/m 8 m ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 1 Use of Slopes and eflection Tables 150 kn m 150 kn 0 kn/m m m 8 m 8 m δ ( ) P + θ ( ) P 0 kn/m 8 m δ δ ( ) θ θ ( θ ) p + ( θ ) and ( ) p + ( ) Figure 4. Total Slope and eflection of Point ( θ )

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. Use of Slopes and eflection Tables Indeed, given the information given under cases 5 and 6 of Tables c, the slope and deflection for an value /4 could have been epressed analticall. Taking the derivative of the epression obtained in this a, ould have ielded the slope of the beam over the same interval. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. Use of Slopes and eflection Tables The slope at both ends of the beam ma be obtained b simpl adding the corresponding values given in the table. Hoever, the maimum deflection of the beam of Fig. 1 cannot be obtained b adding the maimum deflections of cases 5 and 6 (Table c), since these deflections occur at different points of the beam.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 4 Use of Slopes and eflection Tables ppling case 5 on the illustrative eample to find both the slope and deflection of point of the beam (Fig. 1), ields Pb ( ) [ ( b ) ] 6EI d Pb ( θ ) [ ( b )] P P d 6EI 150 10 (6) ( [ ( 8 6 )( ) ] 6 10 )() 8 6 100 150 10 (6) 6 100 6 ( 10 )() 8 0.009 m [ () ( 8 6 )] 0.00 rad These values confirm the results obtained using Eq. 5 of the integration method. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 5 Eample 6 Use the method of superposition to find the slope and deflection at point of the beam.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 6 Eample 6 (cont d) The given loading can be obtained b superposing the loadings shon in the folloing picture equation (Fig. 5). The beam is, of course, the same in each part of the figure. For each the loadings 1 and, the slope and deflection at can be determined b using the Tables 1 or. (Tetbook Table -19) ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 7 Eample 6 (cont d) Figure 5 + oading 1 oading + θ ( ) θ ( ) 1 ( θ ) 1 ( )

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 8 Problem 6 (cont d) For the beam and loading shon, determine the slope and deflection at point. SOUTION: Superpose the deformations due to oading I and oading II as shon. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 9 ( θ ) Eample 6 (cont d) ( / ) + 6EI oading 1: From Table 1a or Table a (also Table -19 of the tetbook), 4 ( θ ) and ( ) (7a) 1 1 6EI 8EI oading : From the same tables: + 48EI ( / ) 4 and ( ) + 8EI 4 18EI (7b)

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 40 Eample 6 (cont d) Figure 6 ( θ ) oading ( θ ) In portion, the bending moment for loading is zero, thus the elastic curve is a straight line: ( θ ) ( θ ) + (8) 48EI ( ) ( ) + ( θ ) (9) Slope ( θ ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 41 Eample 6 (cont d) Total slope and deflection: Slope of Point : θ ( θ ) + ( ) θ + 6EI 48EI 1 7 48EI eflection of Point : 4 4 7 + θ + + 18EI 48EI 84EI ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) + ( ) 1 4 4 4 7 41 + 8EI 84EI 84EI

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 4 Eample 7 Use the method of superposition, determine the deflection at the free end of the cantilever beam shon in Fig. 7 in terms of,, E, and I. Figure 7 ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 4 Eample 7 (cont d) Figure 8 oading 1 oading + + Straight ine δ θ ( δ ) 1 ( θ ) 1 ( δ ) ( θ )

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 44 Eample 7 (cont d) Using the solutions listed in Table 1a. ases 1 and (Tetbook Table -19) ith P δ ( δ ) + ( δ ) ( δ ) + ( δ ) + ( ) θ 1 P() EI ( ) EI 4 + 8EI 6EI 1 4 71 + 8EI 6EI 4EI 4 ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 45 Eample 8 For the simpl supported beam of Fig. 9, use the method of superposition to determine the total deflection at point in terms of P,, E, and I. P P Figure 9 /4 /4

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 46 Eample 8 (cont d) /4 P P /4 Figure 0 oading 1 oading P P /4 /4 + /4 /4 From Table 1c (Tet -19) ase 6 / P center 48EI From Table 1b (Tet -19) ase 5 a / 4, b / 4 Pb( 4b ) center 48EI ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 47 Eample 8 (cont d) Table 1b

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 48 Eample 8 (cont d) Table 1c ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 49 Eample 8 (cont d) eflection due to oading 1: P 1 48EI ( ) eflection due to oading : [ ] Pb ( ) ( 4b ) P( / 4) 4( / 4) 11P 48EI 48EI 768 EI Therefore, total deflection of point ( ) + ( ) P 11P 48EI 768EI 1 9P 56EI

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 50 Eample 9 Using the method of superposition, find the deflection at a point mida beteen the supports of the beam shon in the figure in terms of,, E, and I. /4 Figure 1 / /4 ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 51 Eample 9 (cont d) The deflection at a point mida beteen the supports can be determined b considering the beam shon in Fig.. Note that since the shear forces V and V do not contribute to the deflection at an point in span, the mid-span deflection can be epressed as δ δ M + δ mid (8) M

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 5 Eample 9 (cont d) M 8 / 4 V Figure /4 V 4 /4 M 4 4 16 ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 5 Eample 9 (cont d) Using the solutions listed in Table 1, Table, or Table -19 of the tetbook ith M /8 and M /16 δ mid δ + δ M M 4 5 56EI ( / 8)( ) ( /16)( ) 16EI + 16EI

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 54 Eample 9 (cont d) Table 1d ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 55 Eample 10 For the beam in Fig., determine the fleural stress at point and the deflection of the left-hand end. 5 psi 6 in Figure 4 in P 600 lb 80 in E.4 10 6 psi

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 56 Eample 10 (cont d) The stress at point is a combination of compressive fleural stress due to the concentrated load and a tensile fleural stress due to the distributed load, hence, M z σ I ( ) M ( ) [ 5( 4)( 80) / ]( ) I 4( 6) /1 z 600 6 ( 80)( ) ( 4) /1,666.7 + 000.0. psi (compression) ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 57 6 in Eample 10 (cont d) E.4 10 6 psi 5 psi 4 in P 600 lb 80 in Figure 4 δ δ z z δ + δ δ z

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 58 Eample 10 (cont d) The deflection at the end of a cantilever beam ith uniforml distributed load is given b (see Table 1a, case ) 4 4 5( 4)( 80) 8EI z 8 [ /1] 6 (.4 10 ) 4( 6) 0 0.596 in and ith concentrated load at the end is given b (see Table 1a, case 1) P 600( 80) z EI.4 [ /1] 6 ( 10 ) 6( 4) 0 1. in ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 59 Eample 10 (cont d) Table 1a

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 60 Eample 10 (cont d) Superimposing the results for the deflections due to the concentrated and distributed loads, the deflection at the free end is the vector sum: δ + z 0 0 ( 0.566) + ( 1.) 1.447 in ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 61 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams The Superposition Method The concept of the superposition, hich states that a slope or deflection due to several loads is the algebraic sum of the slopes or deflections to each individual loads acting alone can be applied to staticall indeterminate beams. The superposition can provide the additional equations needed in the analsis.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 6 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams The Superposition Method Procedure Selected restraints are removed and replaced b unknon loads, e.g., forces and couples. Sketching of the deformation (deflection) diagrams corresponding to individual loads (both knon and unknon). dding up algebraicall the individual of components of slopes or deflections to produce the knon configuration. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 6 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition etermine the reactions at the supports for the simpl supported cantilever beam (Fig.5) presented earlier for the integration method.

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 64 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) First consider the reaction at as redundant and release the beam from the support (remove restraint). The reaction R is no considered as an unknon load (see Fig. 9) and ill be determined from the condition that the deflection at must be zero. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 65 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) R + ( ) (a) (b) (c) R ( ) R Figure 9. Original oading is roken into To oads

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 66 pplication of Superposition to Staticall Indeterminate eams Method of superposition ma be applied to determine the reactions at the supports of staticall indeterminate beams. esignate one of the reactions as redundant and eliminate or modif the support. etermine the beam deformation ithout the redundant support. Treat the redundant reaction as an unknon load hich, together ith the other loads, must produce deformations compatible ith the original supports. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 67 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) In reference to Table 1a cases 1 and (Table 19 of Tetbook): R EI ( ) + and ( ) 4 EI R 8 The deflection at in the original structural configuration must equal to zero, that is ( ) + ( ) 0 R (7) (8)

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 68 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Slopes and eflection Tables Table 1a ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 69 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) Substituting Eq. 7 into Eq. 8, gives 4 R + 0 (9) EI 8EI Solving for R, the result is R + 8 (40)

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 70 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) From the free-bod diagram for entire beam (Figure 40), the equations of equilibrium are used to find the rest of the reactions. + F 0; R + R 0 R R (41) ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 71 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) R M / R R Figure 40. Free-bod iagram for the Entire eam

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 7 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) ut R from Eq. 40, therefore 8 5 R (4) 8 8 + M 0; - M R + ( ) 0 1 1 M R + 8 1 (4) 8 ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 7 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Illustrative Eample using Superposition Method (cont d) From Eqs.40, 4, and 4, R M 0 1 8 5 8 8 Which confirms the results found b using the integration method. R R

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 74 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Eample 1 beam is loaded and supported as shon in the figure. etermine (a) the reaction at supports and in terms of and, and (b) the deflection at the left end of the distributed load in terms of,, E, and I. ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 75 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Eample 1 (cont d) δ θ δ θ δ P δ R θ R δ R + + θ P δ P θp R Figure 41 The portion in Figs. 41a and is a straight line. θ R (a) (b) (c)

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 76 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Eample 1 (cont d) δ Note that the portion of the beam in Figs. 41a and 41b is a straight line, therefore (a) Using the solution listed in Table 1a ith P δ + θ( ) + δ P + θp ( ) + δ R 0 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) R ( ) 8EI 6EI EI EI + EI 0 (44) ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 77 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Slopes and eflection Tables Table 1a

R ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 78 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams F Eample 1 (cont d) From hich (Eq. 44), 8 R + 7 R M Equilibrium equations give + F 0; R P ( ) + R 0 8 + R 0 EI 70 R 7 R ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 79 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams F Eample 1 (cont d) + M 0; R ( ) P( ) ( )( ) 8 7 ( ) 4 M 16 0 0 M R 9 (b) eflection at left end of distributed load (at ): 8 R R 7 8 M R δ δ R ( ) ( ) + M + M ( 8 / 7)( ) ( 8 / 7)( ) ( ) ( ) EI + δ M 7 + δ + P 8 7 + δ EI EI 8EI 4 6 81EI 4

ETURE 19. EMS: EFORMTION Y SUPERPOSITION (9.7 9.8) Slide No. 80 Staticall Indeterminate Transversel oaded eams Slopes and eflection Tables Table 1b